Process for adapting resonance frequency of a BAW resonator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8291559
  • Patent Number
    8,291,559
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 24, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 23, 2012
    11 years ago
Abstract
A method of manufacturing a filter circuit including series and parallel coupled BAW resonators is given which compensates for frequency tolerances of the resonators which are due to the manufacturing process. The new method includes measuring a resonance frequency of at least one type of the BAW resonators produced on a wafer and defining a deviation from a desired frequency. A trimming layer is then deposited onto the entire wafer. At last, a thickness portion of the trimming layer is selectively removed, the portion being dependent on a location on the wafer and on the calculated deviation of the resonance frequency at this location.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to a BAW resonator device (BAW=bulk acoustic wave), for example a BAW Filter used for RF filters in mobile communication and other wireless applications.


BACKGROUND

BAW resonators and filter circuits comprising BAW resonators are manufactured by subsequently depositing and structuring functional layers of the resonator on top of a substrate. Such layers comprise at least a bottom electrode layer, a piezoelectric layer, and a top electrode layer. Techniques well known from the semiconductor micro electronic devices can be used for manufacturing these layers.


BAW resonators are characterized by a resonance frequency that are dependent on the total thickness of the functional layers of the resonator and, if present, a thickness of one or more additional layers such as passivation layers or tuning layers on top of the BAW resonator.


Like many other processes, a layer deposition on a substrate, typically a wafer, produces thickness deviations over the entire substrate, over a batch of a multitude of parallel processed substrates or from batch to batch. These deviations and tolerances may shift a resonator's resonance frequency to an extent that the specification of a given standard fails. With a process according to the state of the art, deviations up to +/−15 MHz are observed at devices resonating in the 2 GHz domain. Thus, methods are required to re-shift the resonance back into the specification for as many devices as possible to enhance the yield and reduce production costs.


Duplexers required for separating Tx and Rx signals in mobile phones working in a WCDMA standard are the most common application of filter circuits comprising BAW resonators. Most of these standards have specifications with very small tolerances for the frequency of the center frequency of such filters. More serious are the specifications for the skirts of the filter passbands of Tx and Rx filters that face each other. In the PCS standard the distance between the respective passband band edges (edges are located at 1910 MHz and 1930 MHz) of the neighboring bands are only 20 MHz. With a flank steepness easy to achieve according to state of the art resonators and manufacturing processes there is only left a tolerance of 2-3 MHz that the center frequency may deviate from without leaving the specification of the standard.


It is known to deposit a trimming layer of a calculated thickness all over the entire wafer and all BAW resonators manufactured on this wafer to shift as many resonators as possible into a desired frequency range keeping the specification. But it is impossible to optimize all BAW resonators if variations of center frequency are too big over the same wafer or over the same batch of wafers.


SUMMARY

In one aspect, the invention provides a method of manufacturing a filter circuit comprising BAW resonators. Use of the method enhances the yield, keeping BAW resonators and filter circuits within the specification.


In one embodiment, it is proposed to deposit a trimming layer onto the substrate with the manufactured tuned BAW resonators and then to selectively remove a thickness portion of the trimming layer, the portion being dependent on a location on the wafer and on the deviation of a center frequency of a BAW resonator at this location.


As an example, a method can be used to manufacture a filter circuit comprising series and parallel coupled BAW resonators. Functional layers are subsequently deposited onto a substrate wafer for all BAW resonators in parallel. The active layers comprise at least a bottom electrode, a piezoelectric, and a top electrode. Each functional layer may be structured immediately after deposition to receive not a single BAW resonator but a multitude of circuits of BAW resonators, each circuit comprising a series of BAW resonators electrically coupled in series as well as parallel BAW resonators electrically coupled in parallel within each circuit. Coupling is done by structuring the electrode layers accordingly to form top and bottom electrodes as well as circuiting portions to make the desired coupling of series and parallel BAW resonators.


After completing the deposition and structuring of the functional layers a tuning layer of a selected thickness of a first dielectric is deposited selectively onto the parallel BAW resonators on the wafer. This is done to shift the resonance frequency of these resonators by the additional mass of the tuning layer to a lower frequency according to the known design principle of the filter circuit being a ladder type or a lattice type circuit realizing a pass band filter.


Then, a resonance frequency of at least one type of the BAW resonators on the wafer is measured and a deviation of the measured resonance frequencies from a desired value is calculated. The deviation is planned to be a too high resonance frequency needing a further mass impact on top of the BAW resonators to shift the resonance frequency into the desired range.


Shifting is done by depositing the trimming layer onto the entire wafer and selectively removing a thickness portion of the trimming layer. The portion is dependent on a location on the wafer and on the frequency deviation at this location and is inversely dependent on a thickness of an additional trimming layer calculated from the deviation.


With this trimming layer and a selected removing method it is possible to shift the resonance frequency of most of the BAW resonators into a range that obeys the standard. This notably enhances the yield of filter circuits falling within the standard. A total yield of about 90% or more is realistic with this method. Not counting defective resonators, the amount of BAW resonators having the desired frequency can reach up to 100 per cent by this method.


In an embodiment of the invention, the step of depositing a trimming layer onto the entire wafer comprises first a deposition of a mask layer covering the BAW resonators of a first type and uncovering the BAW resonators of the second type. This first type is usually the series type that does not need a frequency shift to a lower resonance frequency. By this mask layer the deposition of material of the trimming layer on the areas covered by the mask is avoided. In a further step the mask is removed together with the portion of the trimming layer deposited thereon. The mask layer can be a resist layer of a resin. A photoresist that can be structured directly is preferred.


The step of measuring a resonance frequency of at least one type of the BAW resonators may comprise measuring of the resonance frequencies of both types of the BAW resonators. Moreover, the resonance frequency may be measured by measuring the frequency properties of the filter circuits. This allows the calculation of the frequency deviation for all resonators and to shift both types of resonators into the desired or necessary range.


Further it is advantageous to measure the resonance frequency of BAW resonators manufactured on a multitude of wafers that are processed at the same time. These wafers belonging to the same batch can then be tuned and trimmed in parallel with the new method.


In the step of measuring a resonance frequency of at least one type of the BAW resonators, only selected filter circuits that are distributed over the wafer are measured. The distribution of the selected filters may be a regular one. But it is also possible to select filter circuits at those locations that are prone to a strong thickness variation of any of the functional layer due to a property of the used deposition apparatus. A representative selection of measured filter circuits may comprise about 400 circuits of 20,000.


Using the measured values of selected filter circuits the deviation of the resonance frequencies from a desired value may be calculated for the other filter circuits by an interpolation step. This step would result in a distribution of the deviation over the whole wafer so that a deviation is calculated for each filter circuit or each BAW resonator on the wafer or on the wafers of the batch.


The trimming layer may comprise a layer of an oxide or a nitride, preferably of silicon. These materials are easily deposited by known controllable processes and apparatuses. Moreover these materials are relatively low weighted and thus have a relative low impact on the resonance frequency of the BAW resonators on which they are deposited. Hence, an unavoidable thickness tolerance during deposition or further processing results in a too high frequency shift of the respective BAW resonator.


The material of the tuning layer and trimming may be the same or different. Both layers are applied to shift resonance frequency. Hence, properties supporting one of these processes are advantageous for both.


It is known that a desired resonance frequency of the BAW resonator defines the necessary total thickness of the BAW resonator. It is preferred to deposit the functional layers in a total thickness substantially less than the thickness necessary to result in the desired resonance frequency. Then, after removing the thickness portion of the trimming layer, another thickness portion of the trimming layer remains on top of the BAW resonators. This remaining thickness portion may function as a passivation layer of the filter circuit. It contributes to the total thickness of the resulting BAW resonator and hence contributes to the frequency of the BAW resonator. This passivation function of the remaining trimming layer portion applies for the oxide or nitride layers.


It is preferred to deposit the trimming layer in a thickness d0 where d0≧2dR and dR is the remaining thickness portion of the trimming layer calculated for resulting in the desired frequency of the filter circuit or the BAW resonator. This means, in other words, that the thickness portion of the trimming layer that has to be removed accords to or extends the remaining thickness portion. At this thickness relation the process of removing the thickness portion can be controlled easily.


The process is controlled in that a desired thickness of the BAW resonators at the end of the manufacturing process is calculated to be the sum of the total thickness of the functional layers plus at least 10 nm of the remaining trimming layer. A thickness of about 30 nm is preferred. In an embodiment, the trimming layer is deposited to a thickness of about 90 nm and preferably 100 nm or more for BAW resonators that resonate about 2 GHz. For lower frequencies a smaller thickness of the trimming layer may be selected.


A laser ablation process can be used to remove the necessary thickness portion of the trimming layer. The amount of energy that is brought into the trimming layer at a given location on the wafer by the laser is dependent on the time of exposition to the scanning laser. The amount of energy impacting on the trimming layer at this location controls the thickness portion removed by the laser. This process can be controlled easily without masking by a respective scanning program. But any other processes for controllably removing a thickness portion of the trimming layer may be used as well.


Another preferred process is ablation by an ion beam. For this process inert ions like noble gas ions may be used as well as reactive ions like halogenides which are able to make a chemical reaction with the trimming layer material. This process has another advantage since the energy of the ion beam can be controlled by an accelerating voltage.


But any other processes for controllably removing a thickness portion of the trimming layer may be used as well.


The process can be controlled in the thickness of deposition and ablation that a tolerance of most 4 nm results in total for both processes, i.e., for deposition and ablation of the trimming layer. In some cases a tolerance of +/−1 nm may be reached. This complies with a frequency tolerance of ±0.5 MHz at a center frequency of about 1.9 GHz.


The method can be used for the manufacture of duplexers comprising two filters, at least one of them being a filter circuit of BAW resonators. As the correct frequency position is most relevant for the two facing filter skirts of the duplexer's pass bands it is possible to use the proposed trimming process only for one type of BAW resonator. A filter circuit of BAW resonators used for the Tx filter of a duplexer needs only trimming of the series resonators to have most effect onto the upper skirt while for a Rx filter a trimming of the parallel resonators has improved the impact on the frequency exactness of the lower skirt.


For conducting a trimming process selectively for one type of BAW resonators the other type of resonators can be protected by a resist mask deposited or structured to selectively cover those resonators that are not to be trimmed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the invention will be explained further in detail with respect to the accompanied drawings. The figures are schematic only and not drawn to scale. Some parts may be depicted enlarged such that no relative dimensions can be taken from the figures.



FIGS. 1A to 1D, collectively FIG. 1, show subsequent states in manufacturing a filter circuit comprising BAW resonators;



FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a duplexer with two filter circuits comprising BAW resonators;



FIG. 3 shows in a diagram two transmission curves of the filters of a duplexer comprising BAW resonators; and



FIG. 4 shows the measured frequency distribution of center frequencies of a multitude of filter circuits before and after the trimming process.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The making and using of the presently preferred embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.



FIG. 1 shows schematic cross sections of a filter circuit comprising BAW resonators at different stages of manufacture. Subsequent functional layers of the filter circuit are deposited and optionally structured after deposition. A substrate SU may comprise a wafer of a crystalline material such as silicon, for example. On top of the substrate SU may be arranged an acoustic mirror comprising, for example, two pairs of approximately lambda quarter (λ/4) thick layers (not depicted in the figure). Each pair comprises two layers with differing acoustic impedance, i.e., a layer of high impedance and a layer of low impedance. For the first layer a heavy metal W or Mo may be used while an oxide is a preferred material for the low impedance mirror layers.


Another resonator concept uses a substrate that is thinned to a membrane under the resonator thereby allowing the acoustic energy to be kept within the functional layers of the resonator. This concept does not need a mirror.


The first layer of the functional layers is the bottom electrode BE. A heavy metal like W or Mo is preferred, but other conductive materials such as Al are possible for this layer as well. The bottom electrode BE layer is structured to extend mainly in the resonator area under the respective resonator. Adjacent resonator areas are formed by this structuring. Further it is possible to electrically couple two adjacent resonators by forming a conductive connection from the bottom electrode layer material.


The next layer is the piezoelectric layer PL. It is deposited on top of the bottom electrode and may comprise AlN, ZnS or another piezoelectric material that can be deposited as a thin film. Structuring of the piezoelectric layer PS follows to separate the layer into single resonators and/or to get access to the bottom electrode.


A top electrode TE, which may comprise Al, is deposited on top of the piezoelectric layer. A heavy metal may be preferred alternatively. Structuring of this layer is done to simultaneously form electric connections out of the top electrode layer to couple the resonators in the necessary way. Three electric terminals allow the driving of the two depicted resonators as a series or a parallel resonator each. FIG. 1A shows the arrangement after this step.


In a subsequent next step, a tuning layer TUL is deposited and structured. It is possible to first arrange a resist mask on top of the resonators and then deposit the tuning layer material. A nitride or oxide of silicon is preferred for the tuning layer TUL. After structuring, the tuning layer TUL is only on top of those resonators with a frequency that is to be shifted to a lower frequency. Thus, the thickness of the tuning layer TUL accords to the difference of resonance frequency necessary between series and parallel resonators. FIG. 1B shows the arrangement at this point, the right resonator carrying the tuning layer has a lower resonance frequency.


According to an embodiment of the invention, the total thickness of the functional layers of the resonators is controlled to be smaller than necessary. Hence, the so produced resonators have a resonance frequency above the value desired for the filter circuit.


In a subsequent step, a selected number of resonators are tested to determine their resonance frequencies. Alternatively, it is possible to measure the frequency response of a whole filter circuit and not of a single resonator of the circuit with a detector head. The measuring results of the selected resonators are then used to determine by interpolation the distribution of frequencies over the substrate which may be a wafer. The deviation of the measured frequencies from the respective desired frequency in the filter circuit is calculated along with the trimming layer thickness distribution necessary to shift the resonators' frequency to the desired frequency by means of a trimming layer having an according thickness.


In a subsequent step, a trimming layer TRL is deposited onto the entire wafer in a thickness D0 greater than the necessary tuning layer thickness calculated DR. FIG. 1C shows a single resonator carrying a portion of the trimming layer TRL.


In a subsequent step, a thickness portion the trimming layer TRL is removed in a controlled ablating process. The removed thickness portion at a given location on the wafer accords to the difference between deposited thickness D0 and the at least remaining thickness DR. As the thickness portion to be removed varies according to the distribution of measured frequencies over the wafer the ablating process is controlled accordingly. An ion beam etch or a laser ablation are possible ablating processes. FIG. 1D shows the resonator with the thinned trimming layer TRL′ of desired thickness DR. As a result, the resonator now has the desired resonance frequency at only a small tolerance of at most about 0.5 MHz.



FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a duplexer comprising a receive filter RF and a transmission filter TF, each being connected to an antenna. Each filter RF,TF is formed by a filter circuit comprising series BAW resonators RS coupled in series between the antenna and an output terminal, and parallel resonators RP coupled in parallel to the series connection in a shunting line to ground. An adaptive circuit AC between receive filter RF and the antenna provides a phase shift, for example, to shift the receive filter to “open” in the pass band of the transmission filter and vice versa.



FIG. 3 shows the transmission curves of a duplexer made according to the inventive process above. The duplexer is adapted for the PCS standard and has a very small spacing between the two facing edges of the transmission band TB and the receive band RB of the two filters. It can be seen easily that a sufficient attenuation in the neighbor band can be reached only when the frequency tolerance is as small as possible,. An embodiment of the invention provides a method to reach this goal for most of the filter circuits by the subsequent trimming step as explained.



FIG. 4 shows the frequency distribution of a multitude of measured filters produced on a wafer in a histogram. The left hand distribution shows the measured frequencies on the wafer after deposition of a trimming layer of silicon oxide. This distribution is called the initial distribution. The right hand distribution shows the measured frequencies on the same wafer after the trimming process according to the inventive method. The right hand distribution is called the final distribution.


After the deposition of a trimming layer, the mean frequency measured on the wafer is intentionally too low for the desired product. During the trimming process the frequencies are respectively shifted towards the goal frequency. As this process is controlled in the area according to the measured initial distribution and the initial deviation from the goal frequency calculated therefrom, the final distribution resulting from the process is much smaller. The measured final frequencies are within a smaller range.


In this embodiment, the standard deviation 1σ is about 3800 ppm for the initial distribution. By the trimming process, the standard deviation 1σ has been reduced to about 600 ppm. This makes the frequencies of at least 90% of the filters lie within an allowed tolerance. Thus, these 90% of the filters are correctly working filters.


Another embodiment or another allowed tolerance may still improve this yield.


Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.

Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing a filter circuit comprising series and parallel coupled BAW resonators, the method comprising: depositing functional layers of a plurality of BAW resonators onto a substrate wafer, the functional layers comprising a bottom electrode, a piezoelectric layer, and a top electrode;structuring each of the functional layers to receive a plurality of circuits of BAW resonators, each circuit comprising series BAW resonators electrically coupled in series and parallel BAW resonators electrically coupled in parallel, wherein the coupling is done by the electrode layers;depositing a tuning layer of a first dielectric selectively onto the parallel BAW resonators on the wafer;measuring a resonance frequency of at least one type of the BAW resonators on the wafer;calculating a deviation of the measured resonance frequencies from a desired value;depositing a trimming layer onto the entire wafer; andselectively removing a thickness portion of the trimming layer, the portion being dependent on a location on the wafer and on the calculated deviation at this location.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein depositing the trimming layer onto the entire wafer comprises depositing a mask layer that covers a first type of BAW resonator and that uncovers a second type of BAW resonator.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring the resonance frequency of at least one type of the BAW resonators comprises measuring the resonance frequencies of both series BAW resonators and parallel BAW resonators.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring the resonance frequency of at least one type of the BAW resonators comprises measuring a respective resonance frequency of BAW resonators manufactured on a plurality of wafers that are processed at the same time.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring the resonance frequency of at least one type of the BAW resonators comprises measuring selected filter circuits that are distributed over the wafer; and calculating the deviation of the measured resonance frequencies from a desired value comprises performing an interpolation step to determine a distribution of the deviation over the entire wafer and all filter circuits.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein depositing the trimming layer comprises depositing a layer of an oxide or a nitride.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein, a desired thickness of BAW resonators depends on a desired resonance frequency of the BAW resonators;the functional layers are deposited in a total thickness less than the desired thickness,removing a thickness portion of the trimming layer is performed to an extent that another thickness portion of the trimming layer remains on top of the BAW resonators, the other thickness portion functioning as a passivation layer of the filter circuit.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the trimming layer is deposited in a thickness d0 where d0≧2dR and dR is a calculated remaining thickness portion of the trimming layer.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein a desired thickness of the BAW resonators is calculated to be a sum of a total thickness of the functional layers plus at least 20 nm of the remaining trimming layer.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the trimming layer is deposited in a thickness of at least 90 nm, and after removing the thickness portion of the trimming layer, a remaining thickness of the trimming layer of at least 10 nm remains.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein selectively removing a thickness portion of the trimming layer comprises removing the thickness portion of the trimming layer by a laser ablation process.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the laser ablation process comprises scanning a laser over the trimming layer, thereby ablating the thickness portion according to energy impacted into the trimming layer by the laser and according to the amount of thickness that has to be removed.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein selectively removing a thickness portion of the trimming layer comprises removing the thickness portion of the trimming layer by an ion beam accelerated toward the substrate.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the thickness portion of the trimming layer is removed by a reactive ion etch.
US Referenced Citations (177)
Number Name Date Kind
2859346 Firestone et al. Nov 1958 A
3222622 Curran et al. Dec 1965 A
3293557 Denton Dec 1966 A
3486046 Zalar Dec 1969 A
3549414 Curran et al. Dec 1970 A
3686579 Everett Aug 1972 A
3696312 Kuhn et al. Oct 1972 A
3760471 Borner Sep 1973 A
3764928 Gires et al. Oct 1973 A
3916490 Sheahan et al. Nov 1975 A
3924312 Coussot et al. Dec 1975 A
4019181 Olsson et al. Apr 1977 A
4320365 Black et al. Mar 1982 A
4365216 Minagawa et al. Dec 1982 A
4418299 Momosaki Nov 1983 A
4456850 Inoue et al. Jun 1984 A
4502932 Kline et al. Mar 1985 A
4556812 Kline et al. Dec 1985 A
4562370 Von Dach Dec 1985 A
4642508 Suzuki et al. Feb 1987 A
4897618 Svetanoff Jan 1990 A
5153476 Kosinski Oct 1992 A
5162691 Mariani et al. Nov 1992 A
5166646 Avanic et al. Nov 1992 A
5185589 Krishnaswamy et al. Feb 1993 A
5233259 Krishnaswamy et al. Aug 1993 A
5332943 Bhardwaj Jul 1994 A
5382930 Stokes et al. Jan 1995 A
5446306 Stokes et al. Aug 1995 A
5587620 Ruby et al. Dec 1996 A
5596239 Dydyk Jan 1997 A
5629906 Sudol et al. May 1997 A
5692279 Mang et al. Dec 1997 A
5714917 Ella Feb 1998 A
5801603 Yamamoto et al. Sep 1998 A
5844452 Yamamoto et al. Dec 1998 A
5872493 Ella Feb 1999 A
5873153 Ruby et al. Feb 1999 A
5873154 Ylilammi et al. Feb 1999 A
5894647 Lakin Apr 1999 A
5910756 Ella Jun 1999 A
6051907 Ylilammi Apr 2000 A
6060818 Ruby et al. May 2000 A
6081171 Ella Jun 2000 A
6107721 Lakin Aug 2000 A
6262637 Bradley et al. Jul 2001 B1
6307447 Barber et al. Oct 2001 B1
6339276 Barber et al. Jan 2002 B1
6407649 Tikka et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414569 Nakafuku Jul 2002 B1
6437667 Barber et al. Aug 2002 B1
6469597 Ruby et al. Oct 2002 B2
6480074 Kaitila et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483229 Larson et al. Nov 2002 B2
6486751 Barber et al. Nov 2002 B1
6518860 Ella et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524971 Fetter et al. Feb 2003 B1
6570468 Ma et al. May 2003 B2
6603241 Wong et al. Aug 2003 B1
6650204 Ma et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657517 Barber et al. Dec 2003 B2
6668618 Larson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674291 Barber et al. Jan 2004 B1
6675450 Fetter et al. Jan 2004 B1
6710508 Ruby et al. Mar 2004 B2
6732415 Nakatani et al. May 2004 B2
6743731 Huggins Jun 2004 B1
6746577 Barber et al. Jun 2004 B1
6774746 Whatmore et al. Aug 2004 B2
6842089 Lee Jan 2005 B2
6861783 Wang et al. Mar 2005 B2
6867667 Takeuchi et al. Mar 2005 B2
6874211 Bradley et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885260 Nishimura et al. Apr 2005 B2
6903496 Takeuchi et al. Jun 2005 B2
6917139 Sunwoo et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927649 Metzger et al. Aug 2005 B2
6930437 Nakatani et al. Aug 2005 B2
6946320 Sunwoo et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949268 Wang et al. Sep 2005 B2
6954121 Bradley et al. Oct 2005 B2
6965281 Sunwoo et al. Nov 2005 B2
6989723 Komuro et al. Jan 2006 B2
6992420 Jang et al. Jan 2006 B2
6998940 Metzger Feb 2006 B2
7019604 Gotoh et al. Mar 2006 B2
7030718 Scherer Apr 2006 B1
7031689 Frank Apr 2006 B2
7057477 Wang Jun 2006 B2
7058265 Amparan et al. Jun 2006 B2
7078984 Komuro et al. Jul 2006 B2
7101721 Jorgenson et al. Sep 2006 B2
7114252 Tanielian et al. Oct 2006 B2
7116034 Wang et al. Oct 2006 B2
7123883 Mages Oct 2006 B2
7128941 Lee Oct 2006 B2
7170215 Namba et al. Jan 2007 B2
7180224 Bouche et al. Feb 2007 B2
7187254 Su et al. Mar 2007 B2
7199504 Komuro et al. Apr 2007 B2
7224245 Song et al. May 2007 B2
7227292 Rich et al. Jun 2007 B2
7230509 Stoemmer Jun 2007 B2
7233218 Park et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236066 Ebuchi Jun 2007 B2
7242270 Larson et al. Jul 2007 B2
7250831 Song et al. Jul 2007 B2
7271684 Nishihara et al. Sep 2007 B2
7275292 Ruby et al. Oct 2007 B2
7281304 Kim et al. Oct 2007 B2
7282388 Kwon Oct 2007 B2
7296329 Barber et al. Nov 2007 B1
7304551 Kawamura Dec 2007 B2
7310861 Aigner et al. Dec 2007 B2
7328497 Barber et al. Feb 2008 B2
7332061 Wang et al. Feb 2008 B2
7332985 Larson et al. Feb 2008 B2
7358831 Larson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7362198 Larson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7367095 Larson et al. May 2008 B2
7369013 Fazzio et al. May 2008 B2
7370396 Namba et al. May 2008 B2
7380320 Nakatani Jun 2008 B2
7388454 Ruby et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388455 Larson et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391285 Larson et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391286 Jamneala et al. Jun 2008 B2
7400217 Larson et al. Jul 2008 B2
7408287 Matsumoto et al. Aug 2008 B2
7408428 Larson, III Aug 2008 B2
7423503 Larson et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424772 Larson, III Sep 2008 B2
7425787 Larson, III Sep 2008 B2
7427819 Hoen et al. Sep 2008 B2
7435613 Barber et al. Oct 2008 B2
7436269 Wang et al. Oct 2008 B2
7439824 Aigner et al. Oct 2008 B2
7443269 Chow et al. Oct 2008 B2
7446450 Boland et al. Nov 2008 B2
7455786 Aigner et al. Nov 2008 B2
7463499 Larson, III Dec 2008 B2
7479685 Fazzio et al. Jan 2009 B2
7508286 Ruby et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514844 Unkrich Apr 2009 B2
7522018 Milsom et al. Apr 2009 B2
7525398 Nishimura et al. Apr 2009 B2
7554426 Lee et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561009 Larson et al. Jul 2009 B2
7579926 Jhung Aug 2009 B2
7586392 Unkrich Sep 2009 B2
7600303 Hamou et al. Oct 2009 B1
7612488 Bouche et al. Nov 2009 B1
7612636 Jamneala et al. Nov 2009 B2
7615833 Larson et al. Nov 2009 B2
7629865 Ruby Dec 2009 B2
7631412 Barber et al. Dec 2009 B2
7649304 Umeda et al. Jan 2010 B2
7675390 Larson, III Mar 2010 B2
7714684 Ruby et al. May 2010 B2
7732977 Martin et al. Jun 2010 B2
7737807 Larson et al. Jun 2010 B2
7746677 Unkrich Jun 2010 B2
7791434 Fazzio et al. Sep 2010 B2
7791435 Jamneala Sep 2010 B2
7793395 Ha et al. Sep 2010 B2
7802349 Ruby et al. Sep 2010 B2
7852644 Larson, III Dec 2010 B2
7855618 Frank et al. Dec 2010 B2
7868522 Ruby Jan 2011 B2
7895720 Barber et al. Mar 2011 B2
7924120 Umeda Apr 2011 B2
7996984 Jhung Aug 2011 B2
8080854 Fazzio et al. Dec 2011 B2
8143082 Dungan et al. Mar 2012 B2
8186030 Nakatani May 2012 B2
8188810 Fazzio et al. May 2012 B2
20010054941 Shibata et al. Dec 2001 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100212127 A1 Aug 2010 US