This invention relates generally to processes for treating textile webs to apply one or more treatment agents to such a web, and more particularly to a process for treating a textile web in which both ultrasonic energy and microwave energy are used to facilitate such a process.
The application of treatment agents to a textile web is commonly achieved in one of two manners, one being immersing the textile web into a bath of the treatment agent so that the dye soaks into the textile web and the second being applying treatment agent (which may be a liquid or a particulate treatment agent) to one or both faces of the textile web. Immersion (also commonly referred to as a dip-coating process) of the textile web requires a substantial amount of treatment solution to be used to saturate the textile web. In addition, following saturation the textile web must be washed to remove a substantial amount of unbound treatment agent from the web. While dip-coating results in good penetration of the treatment agent throughout the entire textile web, it presents a relatively inefficient use of the treatment solution and requires considerable post-processing of the web.
Treatment agent may instead be applied (such as by spraying or coating) to one or both faces of the textile web by any number of application techniques including, without limitation, ink jet systems, spray systems, gravure roll, slot die, rod coater, rotary screen curtain coater, air knife, brush and the like. Following the application of a treatment agent to the web, the web is often heated and/or steamed to promote binding of the treatment agent to the textile web. The textile web is then washed, such as in a bath of water or other cleaning solution, to remove unbound and excess treatment agent from the web.
Applying a treatment agent to the textile web in this manner (e.g., as opposed to dip-coating) requires considerably less treatment agent to be initially applied to the web, and thus reduces the time spent heating/steaming the web to facilitate binding of the treatment agent to the web, and also reduces the amount of unbound treatment agent that needs to be subsequently washed from the web. Such treatment operations where the agent is applied to only one face of the textile generally use less treatment agent, but run the associated risk that the treatment agent does not adequately penetrate into and through the web to the opposite face to provide even or uniform treatment of the web. While applying treatment agent to both faces of the textile web somewhat reduces this risk it also requires additional treatment agent to be used, resulting in more unbound treatment agent that must be subsequently removed from the web.
In particular applications, such as where the web is to be used as a filter medium, it is known to apply (e.g., by printing) one or more treatment agents to the surface, or face of the web to impart specific properties or characteristics to the filter medium, such as odor control, anti-microbial, and the like. The treatment agent is simply allowed to wick into the web without much uniformity. As a result, the desired characteristic is non-uniformly present in the web. Where more than one treatment agent is desired, it is difficult to apply a second treatment agent without coating or otherwise inhibiting the first treatment agent.
There is a need, therefore, for a process that reduces the amount of treatment agent that needs to be used in treating a textile web and facilitates improved penetration of one or more treatment agents into and through the web.
In one aspect, a process for treating a textile web generally comprises applying a first treatment agent to the textile web. The web is moved with the first treatment agent applied thereto in an open configuration thereof over a contact surface of an ultrasonic vibration system with the textile web in direct contact with the contact surface of the ultrasonic vibration system. The ultrasonic vibration system is operated to impart ultrasonic energy to the textile web to facilitate the distribution of the first treatment agent through a first extent of the thickness of the textile web. A second treatment agent is applied to the textile web other than by saturating the textile web with the second treatment agent. The web is moved with the second treatment agent applied thereto in an open configuration thereof over a contact surface of an ultrasonic vibration system with the textile web in direct contact with the contact surface of the ultrasonic vibration system. The ultrasonic vibration system is operated to impart ultrasonic energy to the textile web to facilitate the distribution of the second treatment agent through a second extent of the thickness of the web. The second extent is different than the first extent.
In another aspect, a process for treating a textile web generally comprises applying a first treatment agent to the textile web. The web is moved with the first treatment agent applied thereto in an open configuration thereof in a longitudinal direction of the web over a contact surface of an ultrasonic vibration system with the textile web in direct contact with the contact surface of the ultrasonic vibration system. The ultrasonic vibration system is operated to impart ultrasonic energy to the textile web to facilitate the distribution of the first treatment agent within the textile web. A second treatment agent is applied to the first face of the textile web. The web is moved with the second treatment agent applied thereto in an open configuration thereof in a longitudinal direction of the web over a contact surface of an ultrasonic vibration system with the textile web in direct contact with the contact surface of the ultrasonic vibration system. The ultrasonic vibration system is operated to impart ultrasonic energy to the textile web to facilitate distribution of the second treatment agent within the web from the first of the textile web toward the second face thereof. The distribution is non-uniform distribution across a transverse direction of the web.
In yet another aspect, a process for treating a fibrous non-woven web generally comprises applying a solvent to the non-woven web to substantially soften the fibers of the web. The web is moved with the solvent applied thereto in an open configuration of the web in a longitudinal direction thereof over a contact surface of an ultrasonic vibration system with the web in direct contact with the contact surface of the ultrasonic vibration system. The ultrasonic vibration system is operated to impart ultrasonic energy to the web to facilitate fracturing of the fibers of the web.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
With reference now to the drawings and in particular to
The term “spunbond” refers herein to small diameter fibers which are formed by extruding molten thermoplastic material as filaments from a plurality of fine, usually circular capillaries of a spinneret with the diameter of the extruded filaments then being rapidly reduced as by, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,563 to Appel et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 3,692,618 to Dorschner et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,802,817 to Matsuki et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,338,992 and 3,341,394 to Kinney, U.S. Pat. No. 3,502,763 to Hartman, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,542,615 to Dobo et al. Spunbond fibers are generally not tacky when they are deposited onto a collecting surface. Spunbond fibers are generally continuous and have average diameters (from a sample of at least 10) larger than 7 microns, more particularly, between about 10 and 20 microns.
The term “meltblown” refers herein to fibers formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material through a plurality of fine, usually circular, die capillaries as molten threads or filaments into converging high velocity, usually hot, gas (e.g. air) streams which attenuate the filaments of molten thermoplastic material to reduce their diameter, which may be to microfiber diameter. Thereafter, the meltblown fibers are carried by the high velocity gas stream and are deposited on a collecting surface to form a web of randomly dispersed meltblown fibers. Such a process is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,849,241 to Butin et al. Meltblown fibers are microfibers which may be continuous or discontinuous, are generally smaller than 10 microns in average diameter, and are generally tacky when deposited onto a collecting surface.
Laminates of spunbond and meltblown fibers may be made, for example, by sequentially depositing onto a moving forming belt first a spunbond web layer, then a meltblown web layer and last another spunbond web layer and then bonding the layers together. Alternatively, the web layers may be made individually, collected in rolls, and combined in a separate bonding step. Such laminates usually have a basis weight of from about 0.1 to 12 osy (6 to 400 gsm), or more particularly from about 0.75 to about 3 osy.
More suitably, the textile web 23 is sufficiently open or porous so that treatment agents applied to the web may migrate throughout the thickness of the web. The “porosity” of the textile web 23 is a measurement of the void space within the textile and is measured for a particular web specimen in the following manner. For a given length (in centimeters) and width (in centimeters) of a web specimen (e.g., over which the web is generally homogeneous and, as such, has a uniform specific gravity), the specimen is weighed (in grams) by a suitable balance and the thickness (in centimeters) is measured using a suitable device, such as a VIR Electronic Thickness Tester, Model Number 89-1-AB commercially available from Thwing-Albert Instrument Company of Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.A. A total volume (in cubic centimeters) of the web specimen is determined as length×width×thickness. A material volume (in cubic centimeters) of the web specimen (i.e., the volume taken up just by the material in the web specimen) is determined as the weight of the web specimen divided by the specific gravity (in grams/cubic centimeter) of the material from which the web is constructed. The porosity (in percent) of the web specimen is then determined as ((total volume−material volume)/total volume)×100.
In particularly suitable embodiments, the textile web 23 has a porosity of at least about 10 percent, and more suitably at least about 20 percent. In other embodiments the porosity as determined by the Porosity Test may be at least about 50 and in others the porosity may be at least about 75. More suitably, the porosity is in the range of about 10 percent to about 90 percent, and more suitably in the range of about 20 percent to about 90 percent.
In more suitable embodiments, the textile web 23 is constructed for use as a filter medium, and more particularly a high performance filter medium comprising a lofty non-woven fibrous web that is highly porous. The lofty filter medium suitably has a density between about 0.005 g/cm3 and about 0.1 g/cm3, more suitably between about 0.01 g/cm3 and about 0.09 g/cm3 and even more suitably between about 0.02 g/cm3 and about 0.08 g/cm3. The basis weight of the filter medium ranges from about 0.25 to about 15 ounces per square yard (osy), more suitably from about 0.4 to about 14 osy, and even more suitably from about 0.5 to about 13 osy.
Fibers suitable for such a filter medium include crimped spunbond fibers and crimped staple fibers, and these fibers can be monocomponent fibers or multicomponent conjugate fibers. Suitable spunbond fibers and staple fibers have an average diameter of about 10 μm to about 50 μm. Of these crimped fibers, particularly suitable fibers are multicomponent conjugate fibers that contain two or more component polymers, and even more suitable fibers are multicomponent conjugate fibers containing polymers of different melting points. For example, the melting point difference between the highest melting polymer and the lowest melting polymer of the conjugate fibers is suitably at least about 5 degrees C., and more suitably about 30 degrees C., so that the lowest melting polymer can be melted without affecting the chemical and physical integrities of the highest melting polymer.
Generally, staple fibers, including monocomponent and conjugate staple fibers, are carded using a conventional carding process, e.g., a woolen or cotton carding process, or air laid to form unbonded nonwoven fiber webs; and spunbond fibers are formed into unbonded spunbond fiber webs by directly depositing spun fibers onto a forming surface. As is known in the art, monocomponent staple fibers and conjugate staple fibers can be mechanically crimped by passing fully formed fibers through, for example, a stuffer box or gear crimper, and conjugate staple fibers can be crimped by drawing or stretching fully formed fibers before the fibers are cut to staple lengths. Fibers may also be crimped during spinning.
Crimps on monocomponent fibers and conjugate fibers, including spunbond and staple fibers, can be imparted through asymmetric cooling across the cross-section of the fibers, generating solidification gradients within the cross-section, which leads to the formation of crimps, particularly helical crimps. Crimps on conjugate fibers, including spunbond fibers and staple fibers, composed of two or more component polymers that have different crystallization and/or solidification properties can be crimped during the solidification stage of the fiber spinning process, during which the differences in the component polymers create crystallization and/or solidification gradients that cause crimps on the fibers. Further, the differences in crystallization and/or solidification properties, which make the component polymers of the formed fibers to have different heat shrinkages, can be utilized to impart or additionally impart crimps on the fully formed conjugate fibers. Upon exposure to an appropriate heat treatment, the component polymers, having different heat shrinkages, cause crimps on the fibers. Such activation of “latent crimp” can be directed after conjugate fibers are formed into a web, or on the fibers prior to the web formation. The activation of latent crimps on the fibers prior to the web formation is more desirable since this process produces more uniform and dimensionally stable webs.
Unbonded conjugate fiber webs, including conjugate staple fiber webs and conjugate spunbond webs, can be bonded using a conventional bonding process that does not significantly compact the webs. Such processes include through-air bonding, powder adhesive bonding, liquid adhesive bonding, ultrasonic bonding, needling and hydroentangling. These bonding processes are conventional and well known in the art. Among these bonding processes, through-air bonding processes are particularly suitable for the present invention since the bonding processes bond the conjugate fiber webs without applying any substantial compacting pressure and, thus, produce lofty, uncompacted filter media. Through-air bonding processes are further discussed below. Similarly, the nonwoven webs of monocomponent fibers, including staple fiber webs and spunbond fiber webs, can be bonded with the above-disclosed bonding processes other than through-air bonding processes. Through-air bonding processes are not particularly suitable for monocomponent fiber webs unless the processes are used in conjunction with powder adhesive bonding or fluid adhesive bonding processes since through-air bonding processes, which need to melt the web fibers to effect bonds, produce flattened webs having a non-uniform loft.
One particularly suitable filter medium is a through-air bonded non-woven web fabricated from crimped multicomponent conjugate fibers, and more particularly suitable conjugate fibers are spunbond conjugate fibers. For illustration purposes, suitable fibers for a high performance filter medium are bicomponent spunbond conjugate fibers (hereinafter referred to as bicomponent fibers) and bicomponent fiber webs, and to a through-air bonding process although other spunbond or staple conjugate fibers of more than two polymers and other bonding processes can be utilized for the present invention, as discussed above.
These bicomponent fibers have the low melting component polymer at least partially exposed to the surface along the entire length of the fibers. Suitable configurations for the bicomponent fibers include side-by-side configurations and sheath-core configurations, and suitable sheath-core configurations include eccentric sheath-core and concentric sheath-core configurations. Of these sheath-core configurations, eccentric sheath-core configurations are particularly useful since imparting crimps on eccentric sheath-core bicomponent fibers can be effected more easily. If a sheath-core configuration is employed, it is highly desired to have the low melting polymer form the sheath.
A wide variety of combinations of thermoplastic polymers known to form fibers and/or filaments can be employed to produce the conjugate fibers provided that the selected polymers have sufficiently different melting points and, suitably, different crystallization and/or solidification properties. The melting point differences between the selected polymers facilitate the through-air bonding process, and the differences in the crystallization and solidification properties promote fiber crimping, especially crimping through heat activation of latent crimps. Suitable polymers for the present invention include, but are not limited to, polyolefins, e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene and the like; polyamides, e.g., nylon 6, nylon 6/6, nylon 10, nylon 12 and the like; polyesters, e.g., polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate and the like; polycarbonate; polystyrene; thermoplastic elastomers; vinyl polymers; polyurethane; and blends and copolymers thereof. Particularly suitable polymers are polyolefins, including polyethylene, e.g., linear low density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, medium density polyethylene, high density polyethylene and blends thereof; polypropylene; polybutylene; and copolymers as well as blends thereof.
Additionally, the suitable fiber forming polymers may have thermoplastic elastomers blended therein. Of these suitable polymers, particularly suitable polymers for the high melting component include polypropylene and copolymers of polypropylene and ethylene, and particularly suitable polymers for the low melting component include polyethylenes, more particularly linear low density polyethylene and high density polyethylene. In addition, the low melting component may contain additives for enhancing the crimpability and/or lowering the bonding temperature of the fibers, and enhancing the abrasion resistance, strength and softness of the resulting webs. For example, the low melting polymer component may contain about 5 to about 20% by weight of a thermoplastic elastomer such as an ABA′ block copolymer of styrene, ethylene-butylene and styrene. Such copolymers are commercially available and some of which are identified in U.S. Pat. No. 4,663,220 to Wisneski et al. An example of highly suitable elastomeric block copolymers is KRATON G-2740. Another group of suitable additive polymers is ethylene alkyl acrylate copolymers, such as ethylene butyl acrylate, ethylene methyl acrylate and ethylene ethyl acrylate, and the suitable amount to produce the desired properties is from about 2 wt % to about 50 wt %, based on the total weight of the low melting polymer component. Yet other suitable additive polymers include polybutylene copolymers and ethylene-propylene copolymers. The bicomponent fibers have from about 20% to about 80%, preferably from about 40% to about 60%, by weight of the low melting polymer and from about 80% to about 20%, preferably about 60% to about 40%, by weight of the high melting polymer.
Additional examples of suitable non-woven fiber webs 23 for use as a filter medium are described U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,045 (Pike et al.), issued Jan. 2, 2001, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The web treating apparatus 21 in the illustrated embodiment of
The term “treatment agent” as used herein refers to a liquid or particulate agent that imparts some characteristic to the textile web upon being added to the web, or causes (through a change in the properties of the treatment agent or a change in the web after reacting in some manner with the treatment agent) some characteristic to be imparted to the textile web 23 either at the time of application, upon further processing of the web, or sometime after treatment of the web is completed. Examples of suitable treatment agents include, without limitation, fragrance agents, anti-microbial agents, anti-viral agents, odor control agents, UV protection, gas phase/VOC eliminators such as active carbon, TiO2, metal (e.g., copper and iron) modified silica nanoparticles, coatings that have alumina and silica nanoparticles.
In other embodiments, the treatment agent 23 may comprise a solvent to soften the fibers of the textile web 23 upon application thereto and for use in fracturing the fibers in a manner described later herein. Examples of suitable solvents that will cause “softening” of polyolefins (polyethylene and polypropylene) include, without limitation, aromatic hydrocarbons such as toluene and xylene, and chlorinated solvents such as trichloroethane and trichlorobenzene. Examples of suitable solvents and softening agents that will cause “softening” of polyesters include, without limitation, strong alkalies in water (potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide), alkalies in ethanol (0.3% sodium hydroxide in ethanol), mixtures of phenol with trichloromethane, dimethylformamide, and benzyl alcohol.
In a particularly suitable embodiment, the treatment agent is of a composition that provides an enhanced absorption of microwave energy, such as by having a relatively high dielectric loss factor. As used herein, the “dielectric loss factor” is a measure of the receptivity of a material to high-frequency energy. The measured value of ∈′ is most often referred to as the dielectric constant, while the measured value of ∈″ is denoted as the dielectric loss factor. These values can be measured directly using any suitable measurement devices, such as a Network Analyzer with a low power, external electric field (i.e., 0 dBm to +5 dBm) typically over a frequency range of 300 KHz to 3 GHz, although Network Analyzers to 20 GHz are readily available. Most commonly dielectric loss factor is measured at a frequency of either 915 MHz or 2,450 MHz (and at room temperature, such as about 25 degrees Celsius). For example, one suitable measuring system can include an HP8720D Dielectric Probe, and a model HP8714C Network Analyzer, both available from Agilent Technologies of Brookfield, Wis., U.S.A. Substantially equivalent devices may also be employed. By definition ∈″ is always positive, and a value of less than zero is occasionally observed when ∈″ is near zero due to the measurement error of the analyzer.
In one particularly suitable embodiment, the treatment agent has a dielectric loss factor at 915 MHz and 25 degrees Celsius of at least about 10, more suitably at least about 50, and even more suitably at least about 100. For comparison purposes, the dielectric loss factor of water under the same conditions is about 1.2. In another suitable embodiment, the treatment agent has a dielectric loss factor at 2,450 MHz and 25 degrees Celsius of at least about 25, more suitably at least about 50, and even more suitably at least about 100. Water has a dielectric loss factor of about 12 under these same conditions.
As an example, the treatment agent may include additives or other materials to enhance the affinity of the dye to microwave energy. Examples of such additives and materials include, without limitation, various mixed valent oxides, such as magnetite, nickel oxide and the like; carbon, carbon black and graphite; sulfide semiconductors, such as FeS2 and CuFeS2; silicon carbide; various metal powders such as powders of aluminum, iron and the like; various hydrated salts and other salts, such as calcium chloride dihydrate; diatomaceous earth; aliphatic polyesters (e.g., polybutylene succinate and poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate), polymers and copolymers of polylactic acid and polyethylene glycols; various hygroscopic or water absorbing materials or more generally polymers or copolymers with many sites of —OH groups.
Examples of other suitable inorganic microwave absorbers include, without limitation, aluminum hydroxide, zinc oxide, barium titanate. Examples of other suitable organic microwave absorbers include, without limitation, polymers containing ester, aldehyde ketone, isocyanate, phenol, nitrile, carboxyl, vinylidene chloride, ethylene oxide, methylene oxide, epoxy, amine groups, polypyrroles, polyanilines, polyalkylthiophenes. Mixtures of the above are also suitable for use in the treatment agent to be applied to the textile web. The selective additive or material may be ionic or dipolar, such that the applied energy field can activate the molecule.
The applicating device 25 according to one embodiment may comprise any suitable device used for applying liquids to textile webs 23 other than by saturating the entire web (e.g., by immersing the textile web in a bath of treatment agent solution to saturate the web), whether the treatment agent is pre-metered (e.g., in which little or no excess treatment agent is applied to the web upon initial application thereof) or post-metered (i.e., an excess amount of treatment agent is applied to the textile web and subsequently removed).
Examples of suitable pre-metered applicating devices 25 for applying liquid treatment agents to the textile web include, without limitation, devices for carrying out the following known application techniques:
Slot die: The treatment agent is metered through a slot in a printing head directly onto the textile web 23.
Direct gravure: The treatment agent is in small cells in a gravure roll. The textile web 23 comes into direct contact with the gravure roll and the treatment agent in the cells is transferred onto the textile web.
Offset gravure with reverse roll transfer: Similar to the direct gravure technique except the gravure roll transfers the coating material to a second roll. This second roll then comes into contact with the textile web 23 to transfer the treatment agent onto the textile web.
Curtain coating: This is a coating head with multiple slots in it. Liquid treatment agent is metered through these slots and drops a given distance down onto the textile web 23.
Slide (Cascade) coating: A technique similar to curtain coating except the multiple layers of treatment agent come into direct contact with the textile web 23 upon exiting the coating head. There is no open gap between the coating head and the textile web 23.
Forward and reverse roll coating (also known as transfer roll coating): This consists of a stack of rolls which transfers the treatment agent from one roll to the next for metering purposes. The final roll comes into contact with the textile web 23. The moving direction of the textile web 23 and the rotation of the final roll determine whether the process is a forward process or a reverse process.
Extrusion coating: This technique is similar to the slot die technique except that the treatment agent is a solid at room temperature. The treatment agent is heated to melting temperature in the print head and metered as a liquid through the slot directly onto the textile web 23. Upon cooling, the treatment agent becomes a solid again.
Rotary screen: The treatment agent is pumped into a roll which has a screen surface. A blade inside the roll forces the treatment agent out through the screen for transfer onto the textile.
Spray nozzle application: The treatment agent is forced through a spray nozzle directly onto the textile web 23. The desired amount (pre-metered) of treatment agent can be applied, or the textile web 23 may be saturated by the spraying nozzle and then the excess treatment agent can be squeezed out (post-metered) by passing the textile web through a nip roller.
Flexographic printing: The treatment agent is transferred onto a raised patterned surface of a roll. This patterned roll then contacts the textile web 23 to transfer the treatment agent onto the textile web.
Digital textile printing: The treatment agent is loaded in an ink jet cartridge and jetted onto the textile web 23 as the textile web passes under the ink jet head.
Examples of suitable post-metering applicating devices for applying the liquid treatment agent to the textile web 23 include without limitation devices that operate according to the following known applicating techniques:
Rod coating: The treatment agent is applied to the surface of the textile web 23 and excess treatment agent is removed by a rod. A Mayer rod is the prevalent device for metering off the excess treatment agent.
Air knife coating: The treatment agent is applied to the surface of the textile web 23 and excess treatment agent is removed by blowing it off using a stream of high pressure air.
Knife coating: The treatment agent is applied to the surface of the textile web 23 and excess treatment agent is removed by a head in the form of a knife.
Blade coating: The treatment agent is applied to the surface of the textile web 23 and excess treatment agent is removed by a head in the form of a flat blade.
Spin coating: The textile web 23 is rotated at high speed and excess treatment agent applied to the rotating textile web spins off the surface of the web.
Fountain coating: The treatment agent is applied to the textile web 23 by a flooded fountain head and excess treatment agent is removed by a blade.
Brush application: The treatment agent is applied to the textile web 23 by a brush and excess treatment agent is regulated by the movement of the brush across the surface of the web.
It is contemplated that the first treatment agent applied to the textile web 23 by the applicating device 25 may comprise a particulate treatment agent instead of a liquid treatment agent, or a liquid-particulate mixture, without departing from the scope of this invention.
Following application of the first treatment agent to the textile web 23, the textile web is suitably delivered to an ultrasonic vibration system, generally indicated at 61, having a contact surface 63 (
In one particularly suitable embodiment, the textile web 23 is in the form of a generally continuous web, and more particularly a rolled web wherein the web is unrolled during processing and then rolled up following processing for transport to other post-processing stations. For example, as illustrated in
The textile web 23 is suitably advanced (i.e., moved), such as by a suitable drive mechanism 51 (
The approach angle A1 of the textile web 23, in one embodiment, is suitably in the range of about 1 to about 89 degrees, more suitably in the range of about 1 to about 45 degrees, and even more suitably in the range of about 10 to about 45 degrees. The departure angle B1 of the web 23 is suitably approximately equal to the approach angle A1 as illustrated in
In one particularly suitable embodiment, the ultrasonic vibration system 61 is adjustably mounted on the support frame 67 for movement relative to the support frame (e.g., vertically in the embodiment illustrated in
In the second, or operating position of the ultrasonic vibration system 61, the terminal end 65 (and hence the contact surface 63) of the vibration system is substantially spaced from the first position and is in contact with the textile web 23. Movement of the vibration system 61 from its first position to its second position in this embodiment urges the web 23 to along with the contact surface 63 so as to form the approach and departure angles A1, B1 of the web.
Moving the ultrasonic vibration system 61 from its first position to its second position in this manner may also serve to tension, or increase the tension in, the textile web 23 at least along the segment of the web that lies against the contact surface 63 of the vibration system while the web is held between the unwind roll 45 and the wind roll 49. For example, in one embodiment the textile web 23 may be held in uniform tension along its width (i.e., its cross-machine direction dimension), at least at that segment of the web that is contacted by the contact surface 63 of the ultrasonic vibration system 61, in the range of about 0.025 pounds/inch of web width to about 3 pounds/inch of web width, and more suitably in the range of about 0.1 to about 1.25 pounds/inch of web width.
In one particularly suitable embodiment, the ultrasonic vibration system 61 is located relative to the textile web 23 so that the contact surface 63 of the vibration system contacts the face 24b of the web opposite the face 24a to which the dye was initially applied. While in the illustrated embodiment the first treatment agent is applied to the one face 24a of the textile web while the ultrasonic vibration system 61 contacts the opposite face 24b, it is understood that the treatment agent may instead be applied to the face 24b while the ultrasonic vibration system contacts the opposite face 24a.
With particular reference now to
Additionally, the terminal end 73 of the horn 71 is suitably configured so that the contact surface 63 defined by the terminal end of the ultrasonic horn is generally flat and rectangular. It is understood, however, that the horn 71 may be configured so that the contact surface 63 defined by the terminal end 73 of the horn is more rounded or other than flat without departing from the scope of this invention. The ultrasonic horn 71 is suitably oriented relative to the moving textile web 23 so that the terminal end 73 of the horn extends in the cross-machine direction across the width of the web. The width w of the horn 71, at least at its terminal end 73, is suitably sized approximately equal to and may even be greater than the width of the web. It is understood, however, that the width of the horn may be less than the width of the web. It is also contemplated that for relatively wide webs two are more horns may be arranged in side-by-side arrangement to extend across all or part of the web.
A thickness t (
The ultrasonic vibration system 61 of the illustrated embodiment is suitably in the form of what is commonly referred to as a stack, comprising the ultrasonic horn, a booster 77 coaxially aligned (e.g., longitudinally) with and connected at one end to the ultrasonic horn 71 at the connection end 75 of the horn, and a converter 79 (also sometimes referred to as a transducer) coaxially aligned with and connected to the opposite end of the booster. The converter 79 is in electrical communication with a power source or generator (not shown) to receive electrical energy from the power source and convert the electrical energy to high frequency mechanical vibration. For example, one suitable type of converter 79 relies on piezoelectric material to convert the electrical energy to mechanical vibration.
The booster 77 is configured to amplify (although it may instead be configured to reduce, if desired) the amplitude of the mechanical vibration imparted by the converter 79. The amplified vibration is then imparted to the ultrasonic horn 71. It is understood that the booster 77 may instead be omitted from the ultrasonic vibration system 61 without departing from the scope of this invention. Construction and operation of a suitable power source, converter 79 and booster 77 are known to those skilled in the art and need not be further described herein.
In one embodiment, the ultrasonic vibration system 61 is operable (e.g., by the power source) at a frequency in the range of about 15 kHz to about 100 kHz, more suitably in the range of about 15 kHz to about 60 kHz, and even more suitably in the range of about 20 kHz to about 40 kHz. The amplitude (e.g., displacement) of the horn 71, and more particularly the terminal end 73 thereof, upon ultrasonic vibration may be varied by adjusting the input power of the power source, with the amplitude generally increasing with increased input power. For example, in one suitable embodiment the input power is in the range of about 0.1 kW to about 4 kW, more suitably in the range of about 0.5 kW to about 2 kW and more suitably about 1 kW.
In operation according to one embodiment of a process for applying one or more treatment agents to a textile web, a rolled textile web 23 is initially unwound from the unwind roll 45, e.g., by the wind roll 49 and drive mechanism 51, with the web passing the first applicating device 25 and then the ultrasonic vibration system 61. The ultrasonic vibration system 61 is in its second position (as illustrated in
During processing between the unwind roll 45 and the wind roll 49, the textile web 23 is suitably configured in what is referred to herein as a generally open configuration as the web passes over the contact surface 63 of the ultrasonic vibration system 61. The term “open configuration” is intended to mean that the textile web 23 is generally flat or otherwise unfolded, ungathered and untwisted, at least at the segment of the web in contact with the contact surface 63 of the vibration system 61.
A feed rate of the web 23 (i.e., the rate at which the web moves in the machine direction over the contact surface 63 of the vibration system 61) and the width of the contact surface (i.e., the thickness t of the terminal end 73 of the horn 71 in the illustrated embodiment, or where the contact surface is not flat or planar, the total length of the contact surface from one side of the terminal end of the horn to the opposite side thereof) determine what is referred to herein as the dwell time of the web on the contact surface of the vibration system. It will be understood, then, that the term “dwell time” refers herein to the length of time that a segment of the textile web 23 is in contact with the contact surface 63 of the vibration system 61 as the web is drawn over the contact surface (e.g., the width of the contact surface divided by the feed rate of the web). In one suitable embodiment, the feed rate of the web 23 across the contact surface 63 of the vibration system 61 is in the range of about 0.5 feet/minute to about 2,000 feet/minute, more suitably in the range of about 1 feet/minute to about 100 feet/minute and even more suitably in the range of about 2 feet/minute to about 10 feet/minute. It is understood, however, that the feed rate may be other than as set forth above without departing from the scope of this invention.
In other embodiments, the dwell time is suitably in the range of about 0.1 seconds to about 60 seconds, more suitably in the range of about 1 second to about 10 seconds, and even more suitably in the range of about 2 seconds to about 5 seconds. It is understood, however, that the dwell time may be other than as set forth above depending for example on the material from which the web 23 is made, the treatment agent composition, the frequency and vibratory amplitude of the horn 71 of the vibration system 61 and/or other factors, without departing from the scope of this invention.
As the textile web 23 passes the first applicating device 25, the first treatment agent is applied to the one face 24a of the web. The ultrasonic vibration system 61 is operated by the power source to ultrasonically vibrate the ultrasonic horn 71 as the opposite face 24b of the textile web 23 is drawn over the contact surface 63 of the vibration system. The horn 71 imparts ultrasonic energy to the segment of the textile web 23 that is in contact with the contact surface 63 defined by the terminal end 73 of the horn. Imparting ultrasonic energy to the opposite face 24b of the textile web 23 in this manner facilitates a generally uniform migration of the first treatment agent from the one face 24a of the web into and through the web toward the opposite face 24b of the web.
It is understood, however, that the face 24a (i.e., the face on which the first treatment agent is applied) of the textile web 23 may oppose and contact the contact surface 63 of the vibration system 61 without departing from the scope of this invention. It is also contemplated that a second ultrasonic vibration system (not shown) may be used to apply ultrasonic energy to the face 24a of the web, either concurrently or sequentially with the first ultrasonic vibration system 61 applying ultrasonic energy to the opposite face 24b of the web following application of the first treatment agent.
In one suitable embodiment, the ultrasonic energy imparted to the textile web 23 by the ultrasonic vibration system 61 is sufficient to result in the first treatment agent migrating generally uniformly through the entire thickness of the textile web to the opposite face 24b of the web. It is understood, however, that the ultrasonic vibration system 61 may operate to result in the first treatment agent migrating generally uniformly through only a portion of the thickness toward the opposite face 24b of the web.
With reference now back to
In one suitable embodiment, the second treatment agent is different from the first treatment agent and may comprise either a liquid treatment agent or a particulate treatment agent. For example, the second treatment agent may comprise any of the treatment agents described previously herein as being suitable for use as the first treatment agent (but other than the same agent used as the first treatment agent). As one particularly suitable example, the first treatment agent may comprise an anti-microbial composition while the second treatment may comprise an odor control composition. In another suitable embodiment, the first and second treatment agents may generally of the same composition but with the first treatment agent being a liquid and the second treatment agent being a particulate, or both agents may be a liquid with the second treatment agent being of a different viscosity than the first treatment agent.
This second applicating device 125 is particularly operable to apply the second treatment agent to at least one of the faces 24a, 24b of the textile web 23. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
Following application of the second treatment agent to the textile web 23, the textile web is suitably delivered to an ultrasonic vibration system, generally indicated at 161 in
In the continuous textile web 23 processing embodiment illustrated in
With reference to
As the textile web 23 passes the second ultrasonic vibration system 61, the vibration system is operated to impart ultrasonic energy to the segment of the web 23 that is in contact with the contact surface 63 defined by the terminal end 73 of the second ultrasonic vibration system. For example, in the illustrated embodiment the second applicating device 125 applies the second treatment agent to the one face 24a of the textile web 23 (i.e., the same face to which the first treatment agent was applied) and the ultrasonic horn 71 vibrates as the opposite face 24b of the textile web 23 is drawn over the contact surface 63 of the second ultrasonic vibration system. Imparting ultrasonic energy to the opposite face 24b of the textile web 23 in this manner facilitates a generally uniform migration of the second treatment agent from the one face 24a of the web into and through the web toward the opposite face 24b of the web.
It is understood, however, that the face 24a (i.e., the face on which the second treatment agent is applied) of the textile web 23 may oppose and contact the contact surface 63 of the second ultrasonic vibration system 161 without departing from the scope of this invention. It is also contemplated that a another second ultrasonic vibration system (not shown) may be used to apply ultrasonic energy to the face 24a of the web, either concurrently or sequentially with the one second ultrasonic vibration system applying ultrasonic energy to the opposite face 24b of the web following application of the second treatment agent.
In one particularly suitable embodiment, the ultrasonic energy imparted to the textile web 23 by the second ultrasonic vibration system 161 is sufficient to result in the second treatment agent migrating generally uniformly through a thickness (broadly, a second thickness) of the textile web that is less than the thickness (broadly, a first thickness) to which the first treatment agent migrated. In this manner, at least a portion of the thickness of the textile web 23 (e.g., the first thickness subtracted by the second thickness) comprises only the first treatment agent and at least another portion of the thickness of the web (the second thickness) comprises the second treatment agent coating or otherwise interspersed with the first treatment agent. For example, where the first treatment agent is caused to migrate through the entire thickness of the textile web 23 to the opposite face 24b thereof, the second treatment agent is caused upon application of ultrasonic energy to migrate less than the entire thickness through the web from the one face 24a toward the opposite face 24b of the textile web.
Where the first treatment agent is caused to migrate through substantially the entire thickness of the web, it is contemplated that the second treatment agent may be applied to either face 24a, 24b of the textile and caused by ultrasonic energy of the second ultrasonic vibration system 161 to migrate through less than the entire thickness of the web. It is further contemplated that where the first treatment agent is caused to migrate through substantially the entire thickness of the web the second treatment agent may be applied to both faces 24a, 24b of the textile web 23, either concurrently or sequentially, and then caused by ultrasonic energy imparted by the second ultrasonic vibration system to migrate inward from each of the web faces less than one-half of the web thickness so that a central layer of the web comprises only the first treatment agent while opposite outer layers of the web comprise the second treatment agent coating or otherwise interspersed with the first treatment agent.
In other suitable embodiments, the second treatment agent may be applied by the second applicating device 125 only to the face 24b of the textile web 23 opposite the face 24a to which the first treatment agent was applied. The second ultrasonic vibration system 161 imparts ultrasonic energy to the one face 24a of the textile web 23 to facilitate a generally uniform migration of the second treatment agent into and through the web from the face 24b toward the other face 24a. Depending on the thickness to which the first treatment agent was caused to migrate from the face 24a of the textile web 23 into and through the web toward the opposite face 24b, migration of the second treatment agent into and through the web a second thickness may result in either 1) the first and second treatment agents abutting each other within the web to define a first web layer having only the first treatment agent and a second web layer having only the second treatment agent; 2) the first and second treatment agents overlapping each other within the web to define an interior web layer in which the first treatment agent is coated by or otherwise interspersed with the second treatment agent; and 3) the first and second treatment agents are spaced from each other to define an interior web layer that is devoid of both the first and second treatment agents.
Migration of the second treatment to a desired or predetermined thickness into the web upon application of the ultrasonic energy by the second ultrasonic vibration system 161 may be suitably controlled in a number of ways. For example, in one embodiment the terminal end 73 of the ultrasonic horn 71 of the second ultrasonic vibration system 161 may be sized to have a thickness t that is different from the thickness of the terminal end of the horn 71 of the first ultrasonic vibration system so that the dwell time of a web segment moving over the contact surface of the second ultrasonic vibration system is different from that as the web moves over the contact surface of the first ultrasonic vibration system (assuming that the feed rate of the web is the same. Alternatively, or additionally, the feed rate at which the web 23 passes over the contact surface of the second ultrasonic vibration system 161 may be different from the feed rate at which the web passes over the contact surface of the first ultrasonic vibration system 61. In other embodiments, the viscosity of the second treatment agent may alternatively, or additionally, be adjusted to be different from that of the first treatment agent without departing from the scope of this invention.
Additionally, or alternatively, migration of the second treatment agent within the web may be controlled by changing the thermal conductivity of the second treatment agent relative to that of the first treatment agent. The greater the thermal conductivity of the treatment agent, the faster it will conduct heat generated from the ultrasonic horn. The viscosity of the treatment agent will thus decrease faster and therefore penetrate more quickly into the web than a treatment agent having a relatively lower thermal conductivity.
With reference still to
The microwave system 101, with reference to
In a particular embodiment, illustrated in
The application chamber 107 in one particularly suitable embodiment is a tuned chamber within which the microwave energy can produce an operative standing wave. For example, the application chamber 107 may be configured to be a resonant chamber. Examples of suitable arrangements for a resonant application chamber 107 are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,536,921 entitled SYSTEM FOR APPLYING MICROWAVE ENERGY IN SHEET-LIKE MATERIAL by Hedrick et al., issued Jul. 16, 1996; and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,916,203 entitled COMPOSITE MATERIAL WITH ELASTICIZED PORTIONS AND A METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME by Brandon et al, issued Jun. 29, 1999. The entire disclosures of these documents are incorporated herein by reference in a manner that is consistent herewith.
In another embodiment, the effectiveness of the application chamber 107 can be determined by measuring the power that is reflected back from the impedance load provided by the combination of the application chamber 107 and the target material (e.g. the textile web 23) in the application chamber. In a particular aspect, the application chamber 107 may be configured to provide a reflected power which is not more than a maximum of about 50% of the power that is delivered to the impedance load. The reflected power can alternatively be not more than about 20% of the delivered power, and can optionally be not more than about 10% of the delivered power. In other embodiments, however, the reflected power may be substantially zero. Alternatively, the reflected power may be about 1%, or less, of the delivered power, and can optionally be about 5%, or less, of the delivered power. If the reflected power is too high, inadequate levels of energy are being absorbed by the treated textile web 23 and the power being directed into the web is being inefficiently utilized.
The application chamber 107 may also be configured to provide a Q-factor of at least a minimum of about 200. The Q-factor can alternatively be at least about 5,000, and can optionally be at least about 10,000. In other embodiments, the Q-factor can up to about 20,000, or more. If the Q-factor is too low, inadequate electrical field strengths are provided to the treated textile web. The Q-factor can be determined by the following formula (which may be found in the book entitled Industrial Microwave Heating by R. C. Metaxas and R. J. Meredith, published by Peter Peregrinus, Limited, located in London, England, copyright 1983, reprinted 1993):
Q-factor=fo/Δf
where:
fo=intended resonant frequency (typically the frequency produced by the high-frequency generator), and
Δf=frequency separation between the half-power points.
In determining the Q-factor, the power absorbed by the treated textile web 23 is deemed to be the power delivered into the application chamber 107 to the web, minus the reflected power returned from the application chamber. The peak-power is the power absorbed by the treated textile web 23 when the power is provided at the intended resonant frequency, fo. The half-power points are the frequencies at which the power absorbed by the treated textile web 23 falls to one-half of the peak-power.
For example, a suitable measuring system can include an HP8720D Dielectric Probe, and a model HP8714C Network Analyzer, both available from Agilent Technologies, a business having offices located at Brookfield, Wis., U.S.A. A suitable procedure for determining the Q-factor is described in the User's Manual dated 1998, part number 08712-90056. Substantially equivalent devices and procedures may also be employed.
In another aspect, the application chamber 107 may be configured for selective tuning to operatively “match” the load impedance produced by the presence of the target material (e.g. the treated textile web 23) in the application chamber. The tuning of the application chamber 107 can, for example, be provided by any of the techniques that are useful for “tuning” microwave devices. Such techniques can include configuring the application chamber 107 to have a selectively variable geometry, changing the size and/or shape of a wave-guide aperture, employing adjustable impedance components (e.g. stub tuners), employing a split-shell movement of the application chamber, employing a variable frequency energy source that can be adjusted to change the frequency of the energy delivered to the application chamber, or employing like techniques, as well as employing combinations thereof. The variable geometry of the application chamber 107 can, for example, be provided by a selected moving of either or both of the end walls 128 to adjust the distance therebetween.
As representatively shown in
With reference to
In the embodiment illustrated in
To tune the application chamber 107, the appointed tuning components are adjusted and varied in a conventional, iterative manner to maximize the power into the load (e.g. into the dyed textile web), and to minimize the reflected power. Accordingly, the tuning components can be systematically varied to maximize the power into the textile web 23 and minimize the reflected power. For example, the reflected power can be detected with a conventional power sensor, and can be displayed on a conventional power meter. The reflected power may, for example, be detected at the location of an isolator. The isolator is a conventional, commercially available device which is employed to protect a magnetron from reflected energy. Typically, the isolator is placed between the magnetron and the wave-guide 105. Suitable power sensors and power meters are available from commercial vendors. For example, a suitable power sensor can be provided by a HP E4412 CW power sensor which is available from Agilent Technologies of Brookfield, Wis., U.S.A. A suitable power meter can be provided by a HP E4419B power meter, also available from Agilent Technologies.
In the various configurations of the application chamber 107, a properly sized aperture plate 130 and a properly sized aperture 132 can help reduce the amount of variable tuning adjustments needed to accommodate a continuous product. The variable impedance device (e.g. stub tuner 134) can also help to reduce the amount of variable tuning adjustments needed to accommodate the processing of a continuous web 23. The variable-position end walls 128 or end caps can allow for easier adjustments to accommodate a varying load. The split-housing 126a, 126b (e.g., as illustrated in
In another embodiment, illustrated in
As one example of the size of the application chamber 107, throughout the various embodiments the chamber may suitably have a machine-directional (indicated by the direction arrow in the various embodiments) length (e.g., from the entrance 102 to the exit 104, along which the web is exposed to the microwave energy in the chamber) of at least about 4 cm. In other aspects, the chamber 107 length can be up to a maximum of about 800 cm, or more. The chamber 107 length can alternatively be up to about 400 cm, and can optionally be up to about 200 cm. As more particular examples, the chamber 107 length is suitably about 4.4 cm. for an operating frequency of about 5,800 MHz applicator, about 8.9 cm. for an operating frequency of about 2,450 MHz. and about 25 cm. for an operating frequency of about 915 MHz for tuned circular cavities. Such lengths may be much longer for multimode microwave systems.
Where the microwave system 101 employs two or more application chambers 107 arranged in series, the total sum of the machine-directional lengths provided by the plurality of chambers may be at least about 10 cm and proportionally longer for lower frequencies. For example, in other aspects the total of the chamber 107 lengths can be up to a maximum of about 3000 cm, or more. The total of the chamber 107 lengths can alternatively be up to about 2000 cm, and can optionally be up to about 1000 cm.
The total residence time within the application chamber 107 or chambers can provide a distinctively efficient dwell time. The term “dwell time” in reference to the microwave system 101 refers to the amount of time that a particular portion of the dyed textile web 23 spends within the application chamber 107, e.g., in moving from the entrance opening 102 to the exit opening 104 of the chamber. In a particular aspect, the dwell time is suitably at least about 0.0002 sec. The dwell time can alternatively be at least about 0.005 sec, and can optionally be at least about 0.01 sec. In other embodiments the dwell time can be up to a maximum of about 3 sec, more suitably up to about 2 sec, and optionally up to about 1.5 sec.
In operation, after the treated textile web 23 is moved past the second ultrasonic vibration system 161, the web is moved (e.g., drawn, in the illustrated embodiment) through the application chamber 107 of the microwave system 101. The microwave system 101 is operated to direct microwave energy into the application chamber 107 for absorption by at least one of and more suitably both of the first and second treatment agents (e.g., which in one embodiment suitably has an affinity for, or couples with, the microwave energy). The treatment agents are thus heated rapidly, thereby substantially speeding up the rate at which the treatment agents become bound to the textile web 23 (e.g., as opposed to conventional heating methods such as curing in an oven). The web is subsequently moved downstream of the microwave system 101 for subsequent post-processing.
In another embodiment for carrying out a process for applying one or more treatment agents to a textile web 23, illustrated in
Referring now to
In operation, the first treatment agent is applied to the textile web 23 and the first ultrasonic vibration system 61 imparts ultrasonic energy to the web to facilitate a generally uniform migration of the first treatment agent into and through the web in the manner described previously herein. The second treatment agent is then applied to the web by the second applicating device 125. Subsequently, the web 23 is moved past the second ultrasonic vibration system 161 in its open configuration. As the web 23 passes over the terminal end 473 of the ultrasonic horn 471 (
In this manner, the migration of the second treatment agent into and through a second thickness of the web 23 occurs only at those portions of the web that are in direct contact with the horn 471 while the second treatment migrates substantially less, or remains substantially at the face of the web, at those transverse portions of the web that pass over the gap segments 481 of the horn. The resultant web 23 thus has a non-uniform distribution of the second treatment agent across the transverse direction of the web. For example, one or more transverse portions of the web 23 will have only the first treatment agent therein while other transverse portions of the web will have the first treatment agent coated by or otherwise interspersed with the second treatment agent. It is contemplated that the horn configuration 471 illustrated in
While each of the illustrated apparatus 21, 221, 321 and the processes described above comprise the application of two or more treatment agents to the textile web during processing, it is understood that only a single treatment agent may be applied to the textile web and subjected to ultrasonic vibration, with or without subsequent heating or microwave exposure, and remain within the scope of this invention. For example, in a particularly suitable embodiment, the textile web 23 may comprise a non-woven web constructed of multicomponent thermoplastic fibers as described previously herein for use as a filter medium. The treatment agent in such an embodiment may be any liquid treatment agent and is applied to one face 24a of the web such that upon the application of ultrasonic energy to the web by the ultrasonic vibration system 61 the treatment agent is readily drawn from the one face 24a entirely through the web to the opposite face 24b of the web.
Ultrasonic energy applied to textile web 23 heats the thermoplastic fibers to relatively soften the fibers. As a result of the flow of the liquid treatment agent through the thickness of the web, the relatively softened fibers within the web are induced by the flow of liquid to become more oriented in the direction of flow (e.g., from the one face toward the opposite face of the web). Accordingly, fibers that are disposed at or near the opposite face 24b upon re-orientation tend to stick out slightly from the opposite face of the web, thereby substantially increasing the web surface area available for filtering. Such an arrangement also decreases the air frictional drag across the fibers (e.g., through the thickness of the web). It is also contemplated that following such a process the web 23 may be further treated with additional treatment agents as in any of the embodiments described previously.
In another example, the treatment agent may comprise a fiber softening agent such as a solvent so that the fibers soften upon application of the treatment agent to the one face 24a of the web by the applicating device 25. In particular, the solvent works into the fibers, partially dissolving the fibers so that they soften prior to the web 23 being subjected to ultrasonic energy. As the web is moved over the contact surface of the ultrasonic vibration system 61, the ultrasonic energy applied to the web 23 causes the solvent to flash into a vapor, resulting in substantial pressure within the fibers. The fibers thus at least partially fracture, resulting in small strands of fiber material sticking out from the fiber to increase the web surface area available for filtering, and more suitably the fibers fracture apart into smaller fibers to increase web surface area. Such fracturing also provides for reduced pressure drop across (e.g., through the thickness of) the web. It is also contemplated that following such a process the web may be further treated with additional treatment agents as in any of the embodiments described previously.
When introducing elements of the present invention or preferred embodiments thereof, the articles “a”, “an”, “the”, and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
As various changes could be made in the above constructions and methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2115056 | Samuel | Apr 1938 | A |
2307206 | Fischer | Jan 1943 | A |
2584053 | Seavey et al. | Jan 1952 | A |
2620894 | Peterson et al. | Dec 1952 | A |
2661192 | Horsley et al. | Dec 1953 | A |
2904981 | Macomson | Sep 1959 | A |
2946981 | O'Neill | Jul 1960 | A |
3032460 | Chipman et al. | May 1962 | A |
3066232 | Branson | Nov 1962 | A |
3160138 | Platzman | Dec 1964 | A |
3202281 | Weston | Aug 1965 | A |
3239998 | Carter et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3246881 | Davidson et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3249453 | Schnoring et al. | May 1966 | A |
3273631 | Neuman | Sep 1966 | A |
3275787 | Newberry | Sep 1966 | A |
3278165 | Gaffney | Oct 1966 | A |
3284991 | Ploeger et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3325348 | Bennett | Jun 1967 | A |
3326470 | Loudin et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3338992 | Kinney | Aug 1967 | A |
3341394 | Kinney | Sep 1967 | A |
3410116 | Levinson | Nov 1968 | A |
3425951 | Ishiwata | Feb 1969 | A |
3463321 | VanIngen | Aug 1969 | A |
3471248 | Schaeuble | Oct 1969 | A |
3479873 | Hermanns | Nov 1969 | A |
3484179 | Adams et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3490584 | Balamuth | Jan 1970 | A |
3502763 | Hartman | Mar 1970 | A |
3519251 | Nystrom et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3519517 | Dench | Jul 1970 | A |
3542345 | Kuris | Nov 1970 | A |
3542615 | Dobo et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3567185 | Ross et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3584389 | Hilton et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3591946 | Loe | Jul 1971 | A |
3620875 | Guglielmo, Sr. et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3620876 | Guglielmo, Sr. et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3653952 | Gagliardi | Apr 1972 | A |
3664191 | Hermanns | May 1972 | A |
3672066 | Stephansen | Jun 1972 | A |
3673140 | Ackerman et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3692618 | Dorschner et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3707773 | Wolfberg et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3782547 | Dietert | Jan 1974 | A |
3802817 | Matsuki et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3829328 | Blustain | Aug 1974 | A |
3849241 | Butin et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3865350 | Burtis | Feb 1975 | A |
3873071 | Tatebe | Mar 1975 | A |
3888715 | Fraser et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3902414 | Zimmer | Sep 1975 | A |
3904392 | VanIngen et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3932129 | Porter | Jan 1976 | A |
4035151 | Czerny et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4046073 | Mitchell et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4060438 | Johnson | Nov 1977 | A |
4062768 | Elliot | Dec 1977 | A |
4070167 | Barbee et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4086112 | Porter | Apr 1978 | A |
4122797 | Kawamura et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4131424 | Cocoros | Dec 1978 | A |
4156626 | Souder | May 1979 | A |
4168295 | Sawyer | Sep 1979 | A |
4210674 | Mitchell | Jul 1980 | A |
4218221 | Cottell | Aug 1980 | A |
4234775 | Wolfberg et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4242091 | Feess et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4249986 | Obeda | Feb 1981 | A |
4259021 | Goudy, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
4260389 | Lister | Apr 1981 | A |
4266879 | McFall | May 1981 | A |
4274209 | Kawaguchi | Jun 1981 | A |
4302485 | Last et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4339295 | Boretos et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4340563 | Appel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4365422 | Kawaguchi | Dec 1982 | A |
4372296 | Fahim | Feb 1983 | A |
4379710 | Crounse | Apr 1983 | A |
4393671 | Ito | Jul 1983 | A |
4398925 | Trinh et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4413069 | Marshall | Nov 1983 | A |
4419160 | Wang et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4425718 | Kawaguchi | Jan 1984 | A |
4482239 | Hosono et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4483571 | Mishiro | Nov 1984 | A |
4494956 | Schafer et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4511254 | North et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4511520 | Bowen | Apr 1985 | A |
4548611 | Paterson et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4556467 | Kuhn | Dec 1985 | A |
4602055 | Schafer et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4612016 | Jaeger et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4612018 | Tsuboi et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4626642 | Wang et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4662969 | Wang | May 1987 | A |
4663220 | Wisneski et al. | May 1987 | A |
4673512 | Schram | Jun 1987 | A |
4693879 | Yoshimura et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4699636 | Bofinger et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4706509 | Riebel | Nov 1987 | A |
4707402 | Thorsrud | Nov 1987 | A |
4708878 | Hagelauer et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4726522 | Kokubo et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743361 | Schram | May 1988 | A |
4751529 | Elrod et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4848159 | Kennedy et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4861342 | Danel | Aug 1989 | A |
4877516 | Schram | Oct 1989 | A |
4879011 | Schram | Nov 1989 | A |
4879564 | Long | Nov 1989 | A |
4906497 | Hellmann et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4929279 | Hays | May 1990 | A |
4945121 | Micale et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969968 | Leatherman | Nov 1990 | A |
RE33524 | Schram | Jan 1991 | E |
4983045 | Taniguchi | Jan 1991 | A |
4991539 | Sarda | Feb 1991 | A |
4992636 | Namiki | Feb 1991 | A |
5002587 | Berendt | Mar 1991 | A |
5006266 | Schram | Apr 1991 | A |
5026167 | Berliner, III | Jun 1991 | A |
5028237 | Berendt | Jul 1991 | A |
5032027 | Berliner, III | Jul 1991 | A |
5059249 | Hays | Oct 1991 | A |
5096532 | Neuwirth et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5110403 | Ehlert | May 1992 | A |
5122165 | Wang et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5164094 | Stuckart | Nov 1992 | A |
5169067 | Matsusaka et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169571 | Buckley | Dec 1992 | A |
5171387 | Wuchinich | Dec 1992 | A |
5189078 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5193362 | Otto | Mar 1993 | A |
5193913 | Rosenbaum | Mar 1993 | A |
5217768 | Walters et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220346 | Carreira et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5238975 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5242557 | Jones et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5244525 | Neuwith et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246467 | Cockett et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5258413 | Isayev | Nov 1993 | A |
5269297 | Weng et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5272216 | Clark, Jr. et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5326164 | Logan | Jul 1994 | A |
5330100 | Malinowski | Jul 1994 | A |
5335449 | Beatty | Aug 1994 | A |
5338611 | Lause et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340649 | Roeker et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346932 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5368199 | Haas et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372634 | Monahan | Dec 1994 | A |
5373212 | Beau | Dec 1994 | A |
5375926 | Omasa | Dec 1994 | A |
5391000 | Taniguchi | Feb 1995 | A |
5400460 | Roeker et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5423260 | Goldberg et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5442160 | Kimrey, Jr. et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446270 | Chamberlain et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451446 | Kincaid et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5466722 | Stoffer et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5487853 | Buckley | Jan 1996 | A |
5500668 | Malhotra et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5519670 | Walter | May 1996 | A |
5536921 | Herdrick et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543605 | Kimrey, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5563644 | Isganitis et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5583292 | Karbach et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585565 | Glascock et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5603795 | Paulauskas et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5631685 | Gooray et al. | May 1997 | A |
5652019 | Moran | Jul 1997 | A |
5665383 | Grinstaff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681457 | Mahoney | Oct 1997 | A |
5709737 | Malhotra et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711888 | Trampler et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5770124 | Marecki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770296 | Remerowski et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5798395 | Lauf et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803270 | Brodeur | Sep 1998 | A |
5804801 | Lauf et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810037 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814138 | Fague | Sep 1998 | A |
5831166 | Kozuka et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851274 | Lin | Dec 1998 | A |
5853456 | Bryan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853469 | Colt et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856245 | Caldwell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868153 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871872 | Matijevic et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873968 | Pike et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5902489 | Yasuda et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913904 | Meyer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916203 | Brandon et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922355 | Parikh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935883 | Pike | Aug 1999 | A |
5937906 | Kozyuk | Aug 1999 | A |
5964926 | Cohen | Oct 1999 | A |
5979664 | Brodeur | Nov 1999 | A |
5984468 | Malhotra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989475 | Schulthess et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007662 | Remerowski et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010592 | Jameson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019921 | Lutz | Feb 2000 | A |
6020277 | Jameson | Feb 2000 | A |
6024822 | Alper et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035897 | Kozyuk | Mar 2000 | A |
6045648 | Palmgreen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053028 | Kraus, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053424 | Gipson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055859 | Kozuka et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060416 | Kobata et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074466 | Iwasa | Jun 2000 | A |
6089702 | Hilton | Jul 2000 | A |
6090731 | Pike et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6103812 | Wei et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106590 | Ueno et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114676 | Jerby et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117192 | Tate | Sep 2000 | A |
6129767 | Hong | Oct 2000 | A |
6169045 | Pike et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200486 | Chahine et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203151 | Ruhe | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218483 | Muthiah et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221258 | Feke et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6254787 | Kimura et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266836 | Gallego Juarez et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6303061 | Hewins | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315215 | Gipson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322240 | Omasa | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332541 | Coakley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348679 | Ryan et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350792 | Smetana et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361697 | Coury et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368414 | Johnson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368994 | Sklyarevich | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380264 | Jameson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381995 | Hong | May 2002 | B1 |
6383301 | Bell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409329 | King | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419798 | Topolkaraev et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425663 | Eastlund et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431702 | Ruhe | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436513 | Kitamura et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444964 | Eastlund et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450417 | Gipson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457823 | Cleary et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467350 | Kaduchak et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482327 | Mori et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506584 | Chandler et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508550 | Eastlund et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6547903 | McNichols et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547935 | Scott | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547951 | Maekawa | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551607 | Minerath, III | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566414 | Takeshima et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6576042 | Kraus et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578959 | Sceccombe | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582611 | Kerfoot | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593436 | Austin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600142 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605252 | Omasa | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605651 | Stangel | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6617588 | Sato | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620226 | Hutton et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624100 | Pike et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627265 | Kutilek | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6646026 | Fan et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649888 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652602 | Yang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655826 | Leanos | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6659365 | Gipson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663239 | Wotton et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673178 | Ellner et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6676003 | Ehlert et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683287 | Behnke et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686573 | Behnke et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689730 | Hortel et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6719422 | Wu et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734409 | Wang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6739524 | Taylor-McCune et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6770600 | Lamola | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6783623 | Morin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6817541 | Sands et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818128 | Minter | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822135 | Soerens et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837445 | Tsai | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6841921 | Stegelmann | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6846448 | Rymer et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855760 | Kirsten et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6858181 | Aoyagi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866378 | Wotton et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878288 | Scott | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883724 | Adiga et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890593 | Tian | May 2005 | B2 |
6897628 | Gunnerman | May 2005 | B2 |
6901683 | Lyle et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902650 | Park et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911153 | Minter | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6929750 | Laurell et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935770 | Schueler | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936151 | Lock | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938683 | Lin | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7018546 | Kurihara et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7034266 | DeGroot et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7083322 | Moore et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083764 | Scott | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090391 | Taniguchi | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7108137 | Lal et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7150779 | Meegan, Jr. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156201 | Peshkovskiy et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186772 | Berkau et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7293909 | Taniguchi | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7322431 | Ratcliff | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338551 | Kozyuk | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7404666 | Tessien | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7414009 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419519 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424883 | McNichols et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7465426 | Kerherve et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7504075 | Marhasin | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7516664 | Meier et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533830 | Rose | May 2009 | B1 |
7582156 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7673516 | Janssen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703698 | Janssen et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712353 | Janssen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7735751 | Ehlert et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780743 | Greaves et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785674 | Janssen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010040935 | Case | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020036173 | Feke et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020074380 | Ellner et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079121 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020133888 | Boyes | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142106 | Bethune et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164274 | Haggett et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030042174 | Austin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030047067 | Kraus et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048692 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051989 | Austin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061939 | Hutton et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066899 | Gibson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030116014 | Possanza et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030116888 | Rymer et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118814 | Workman, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118825 | Melius et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119406 | Abuto | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143110 | Kritzler | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030194692 | Purdum | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030234173 | Minter | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040022695 | Simon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065599 | Lal et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079580 | Manna et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040120904 | Lye et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040130606 | Tawaraya et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142041 | MacDonald et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040179076 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187524 | Sen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202728 | Shanker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040222080 | Tour et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232583 | Monsheimer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050000914 | Dahlberg et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008560 | Kataoka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017599 | Puskas | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025797 | Wang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082234 | Solenthaler | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084438 | Do et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084464 | McGrath et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085144 | MacDonald et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092931 | Gadgil et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100812 | Schultheis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129161 | Laberge | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132906 | Fernfors et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050202578 | Yaniv et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208303 | Atarashi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235740 | Desie et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238804 | Garber et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260106 | Marhasin | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060000034 | McGrath | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008442 | MacDonald et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060120212 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060207431 | Beca et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070114306 | Kawakami et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119785 | Englehardt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070131034 | Ehlert et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070170277 | Ehlert | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080061000 | Janssen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062811 | Janssen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063718 | Janssen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063806 | Janssen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080067418 | Ross | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069887 | Baran et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080117711 | Omasa | May 2008 | A1 |
20080155762 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080155763 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080156428 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080156737 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080159063 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192568 | Hielscher et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080251375 | Hielscher et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090014377 | Janssen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090147905 | Janssen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155091 | Ehlert et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158936 | Janssen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162258 | Janssen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165654 | Koenig et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090166177 | Wenzel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090168590 | Koenig et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090168591 | Wenzel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090262597 | Kieffer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100150859 | Do et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100206742 | Janssen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100296975 | Peshkovsky et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2175065 | May 1995 | CA |
657067 | Aug 1986 | CH |
1535249 | Oct 2004 | CN |
1247628 | Mar 2006 | CN |
101153138 | Apr 2008 | CN |
2056104 | May 1972 | DE |
2131878 | Feb 1973 | DE |
3325958 | Feb 1985 | DE |
262553 | Dec 1988 | DE |
9017338 | Mar 1991 | DE |
4344455 | Jun 1995 | DE |
4444525 | Jun 1996 | DE |
19703634 | Oct 1997 | DE |
19854013 | May 2000 | DE |
29923223 | Jul 2000 | DE |
19911683 | Sep 2000 | DE |
19913179 | Sep 2000 | DE |
19913397 | Sep 2000 | DE |
19938254 | Feb 2001 | DE |
10015144 | Oct 2001 | DE |
10245201 | Apr 2004 | DE |
29825063 | Jun 2004 | DE |
10353804 | Jun 2005 | DE |
102004040233 | Mar 2006 | DE |
102005025118 | Jan 2007 | DE |
102005034629 | Jan 2007 | DE |
0041779 | Dec 1981 | EP |
0063203 | Oct 1982 | EP |
0065057 | Nov 1982 | EP |
0065058 | Nov 1982 | EP |
0003684 | May 1983 | EP |
0031862 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0141556 | May 1985 | EP |
0170758 | Feb 1986 | EP |
0188105 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0212655 | Mar 1987 | EP |
0269941 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0292470 | Nov 1988 | EP |
347891 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0455265 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0457187 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0459967 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0281041 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0549542 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0303803 | Jun 1994 | EP |
625482 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0625606 | Nov 1994 | EP |
648531 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0648531 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0282015 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0667245 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0798116 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0894612 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0907423 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0969131 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0984045 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1010796 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1029651 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1238034 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1371697 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1375432 | Feb 2004 | EP |
0984045 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1541322 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1954388 | Mar 2007 | EP |
0983968 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2173669 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2176173 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2175286 | Oct 1973 | FR |
2793811 | Nov 2000 | FR |
2832703 | May 2005 | FR |
2878536 | Jun 2006 | FR |
631882 | Nov 1949 | GB |
850365 | Oct 1960 | GB |
1124787 | Aug 1968 | GB |
1229200 | Apr 1971 | GB |
1257807 | Dec 1971 | GB |
1363277 | Aug 1974 | GB |
1404575 | Sep 1975 | GB |
1466735 | Mar 1977 | GB |
1482755 | Aug 1977 | GB |
1583953 | Feb 1981 | GB |
2120497 | Nov 1983 | GB |
2350321 | Nov 2000 | GB |
5468842 | Jun 1979 | JP |
55107490 | Aug 1980 | JP |
56028221 | Mar 1981 | JP |
58034051 | Feb 1983 | JP |
59171682 | Sep 1984 | JP |
60101090 | Jun 1985 | JP |
61291190 | Dec 1986 | JP |
62001413 | Jan 1987 | JP |
62039839 | Mar 1987 | JP |
63072364 | Apr 1988 | JP |
63104664 | May 1988 | JP |
63318438 | Dec 1988 | JP |
1108081 | Apr 1989 | JP |
1163074 | Jun 1989 | JP |
01213458 | Aug 1989 | JP |
1213486 | Aug 1989 | JP |
2025602 | Jan 1990 | JP |
2167700 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2220812 | Sep 1990 | JP |
2262178 | Oct 1990 | JP |
02281185 | Nov 1990 | JP |
336034 | Feb 1991 | JP |
03053195 | Mar 1991 | JP |
3086258 | Apr 1991 | JP |
3099883 | Apr 1991 | JP |
03-157129 | May 1991 | JP |
3137283 | Jun 1991 | JP |
3244594 | Oct 1991 | JP |
57119853 | Dec 1991 | JP |
04257445 | Sep 1992 | JP |
6228824 | Aug 1994 | JP |
7198257 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7314661 | Dec 1995 | JP |
8304388 | Nov 1996 | JP |
9286943 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10060331 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10112384 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10112385 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10112386 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10112387 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10315336 | Dec 1998 | JP |
1134590 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11133661 | May 1999 | JP |
2000144582 | May 2000 | JP |
2000158364 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001017970 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001228733 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001252588 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002210920 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003103152 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2004020176 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004082530 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004238012 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005118688 | May 2005 | JP |
20020073778 | Sep 2002 | KR |
1020050013858 | Feb 2005 | KR |
1020050113356 | Dec 2005 | KR |
203582 | Jan 1967 | SU |
8910258 | Nov 1989 | WO |
9117889 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9400757 | Jan 1994 | WO |
9420833 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9429873 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9600318 | Jan 1996 | WO |
9609112 | Mar 1996 | WO |
9620784 | Jul 1996 | WO |
9628599 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9743026 | Nov 1997 | WO |
9817373 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9822250 | May 1998 | WO |
9844058 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9933520 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9961539 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0004978 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0026011 | May 2000 | WO |
0026026 | May 2000 | WO |
0029178 | May 2000 | WO |
0031189 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0041794 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0109262 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0110635 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0121725 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0136116 | May 2001 | WO |
0136117 | May 2001 | WO |
0139200 | May 2001 | WO |
0222252 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0250511 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02062894 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02064354 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02080668 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03012800 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03016030 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03102737 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03106143 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03106573 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03106600 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004011044 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004026452 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004037902 | May 2004 | WO |
2004048463 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004050350 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004063295 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004064487 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004076578 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004091841 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004092048 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005014489 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005028577 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005073329 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005080066 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006004765 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006037591 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006043970 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006055038 | May 2006 | WO |
2006073645 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006074921 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006074921 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006093804 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007011520 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2005011804 | May 2007 | WO |
2007060245 | May 2007 | WO |
2007095871 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008029379 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008047259 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008085806 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English machine translation of Nagel WO 2006/074921 A1, accessed on the EPO website. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,417, filed Dec. 28, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,116, filed Jul. 12, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,405, filed Dec. 28, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,124, filed Jul. 12, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,816, filed Dec. 28, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,534, filed Dec. 28, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,473, filed Dec. 28, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,128, filed Jul. 12, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,523, filed Dec. 28, 2006. |
ISR/WO for PCT/IB2007/052946, Dated Dec. 17, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/052947, dated Mar. 12, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,145, filed Jul. 12, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,151, filed Jul. 12, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/052945, dated Feb. 1, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,210, filed Sep. 8, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,311, filed Jan. 26, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/052988, 4 pages, dated Feb. 14, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,140, filed Jul. 12, 2007. |
Taleyarkhan, et al., “Evidence for Nuclear Emissions During Acoustic Cavitation,” Science, (Mar. 8, 2002), vol. 295, pp. 1868-1873. |
Kloeppel, James E., “Temperature inside collapsing bubble four times that of sun,” News Bureau, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. |
Tal-Figiel B., The Formation of Stable W/O, O/W, W/O/W Cosmetic Emulsions in an Ultrasonic Field, viewed at http://www.atypon-link.com/ICHEME/doi/abs/10.1205/cherd06199 on Oct. 19, 2007. |
“Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion,” viewed at http://library.thinkquest.org/17940/texts/fusion—controlled/fusion—controlled.html on Oct. 23, 2007. |
Flannigan, “Measurement of Pressure and Density Inside a Single Sonoluminescing Bubble,” Physical Review Letters (May 26, 2006), PRL 96. |
Taleyarkhan, et al., “Additional Evidence of Nuclear Emissions During Acoustic Cavitation,” Physcial Review E, (Mar. 2004). vol. 69. |
“Thermonuclear Fusion Energy Source for Future Generations,” viewed at http://www.crppwww.epfl.ch/crppfusion/ on Oct. 23, 2007. |
Peplow, Mark, “Desktop fusion is back on the table,” viewed at http://nature.com/news/2006/060109/full/060109-5.html on May 4, 2007. |
Lahey, Taleyarkhan, and Nigmatulin, “Bubble Power,” IEEE spectrum, May 2005, pp. 39-43. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,237, filed Dec. 21, 2007. |
Non-final office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,943, dated May 1, 2009. |
J.D. Lawson, “Some Criteria for a Power Producing Thermonuclear Reactor”, Proc. Phys. Soc. B70, pp. 6-10 (1957). |
L.A. Artsimovich, “Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions”, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, first English translation, 1964. |
D.R.O. Morrison, “Cold Fusion Update No. 9”, Jan. 1994, from Newsgroups sci.physics.fusion, http://www.groups.google.com. |
Brenner et al, Single-bubble sonoluminescence, Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, Apr. 2002, pp. 425-484. |
J. Lister, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 48, pp. 715-716 (2006). |
U.S. Department of Energy, “Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions”, Dec. 1, 2004 (USDOE). |
Non-final office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,497, dated Jun. 26, 2009. |
Cohen, “The Importance of Viscosity in the Web Coating Process,” Web Coating Blog, pp. 1-4 (Mar. 28, 2006). |
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,405 (Jul. 31, 2009). |
Non-final office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,311, dated Nov. 5, 2008. |
Final office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,523, dated Nov. 17, 2008. |
Final office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,534, dated Dec. 4, 2008. |
Non-final office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,816, dated Dec. 15, 2008. |
Final Office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,816, dated Jan. 11, 2010. |
Non-final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,417 (Mar. 9, 2009). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/054909 dated May 8, 2008. |
Non-final Office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,198, dated Nov. 18, 2009. |
Non-final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,534, dated Feb. 11, 2009. |
Final Office Action Regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,311, dated Jun. 23, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/054890, dated Apr. 18, 2008. |
Non-final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,124 (Apr. 20, 2009). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2007/054903 dated Apr. 17, 2008. |
European Office Action regarding European Application No. 07805228.9, dated Oct. 9, 2009. |
Non-final Office action received in U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,128, mailed Jul. 21, 2009. |
Birla, M., et al. “Continuous Dyeing of Cotton Using Ultrasound” AATCC Book of Papers, IC&E, 1996, pp. 309-322. |
Mathur, M. R., et al. “Energy Conservation in Wet Processing: Development of Low Energy Dyeing Machine.” Colourage Annual. 2004. pp. 93-99. |
“Ultrasonics Sound Technology for Textiles and Nonwovens” Express Textile, Issue Dated Aug. 21, 2003, 5 pages. |
Vajnhandl, S., et al. “Ultrasound in Textile Dyeing and the Decolouration/Mineralization of Textile Dyes” Dyes and Pigments. (2005), 65, pp. 89-101. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,523, dated May 29, 2008. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,534, dated May 30, 2008. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,816, dated May 30, 2008. |
Non-final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,473, dated Jun. 2, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/054905 dated May 6, 2008. |
Non-final office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,515, dated Mar. 27, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action Regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/646,816, dated Jun. 26, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/054898, dated May 15, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/054892 dated May 15, 2008. |
Non-final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,405 (Feb. 3, 2009). |
Non-final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/335,231, dated Oct. 15, 2009. |
Blume, T. and Neis, U. “Improved wastewater disinfection by ultrasonic pre-treatment,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2004, No. 11, pp. 333-336. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/054897, dated Apr. 16, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2007/054889, dated Apr. 16, 2008. |
Final Office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,417, dated Sep. 22, 2009. |
Non-final office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,116, dated Sep. 28, 2009. |
Machine translation of WO 2006074921 A1, accessed from the EPO website, Accessed on Mar. 15, 2010. |
Non-final Office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,128, dated Dec. 21, 2009. |
Non-final Office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,183, dated Apr. 19, 2010. |
Non-final Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 11/966,458 mailed Sep. 28, 2010. |
First Office Action for China Patent Application No. 200780033331.3, dated Nov. 14, 2011. |
Non-final Office action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,139, dated Feb. 18, 2011. |
Non-final Office action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,140, dated Feb. 23, 2011. |
Non-final Office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,237, dated Jul. 8, 2010. |
Final Office Action Issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,210 mailed Apr. 19, 2011. |
First Office Action for China Patent Application No. 20088016947.3, dated Jun. 24, 2011. |
First Office Action for Russian Patent Application No. 2009112526, dated Apr. 28, 2011. |
Final Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,210, mailed Jul. 1, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/335,231, mailed Jul. 13, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/335,176, mailed Jul. 13, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,139, mailed Jun. 15, 2011. |
Non-final Office action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,140 on Aug. 9, 2010. |
Non-Final Office action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/966,418 on Aug. 2, 2010. |
Non-Final Office action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/966,447 on Aug. 2, 2010. |
Oct. 27, 2010 Letter regarding the Office action issued for Mexican Patent Application Serial No. MX/a/2009/002519 mailed Oct. 12, 2010. |
First Office Action for China Patent Application No. 200880121407.2, dated Aug. 24, 2011. |
Final Office action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/966,447 mailed Jan. 5, 2011. |
Supplementary European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 08789242 mailed Dec. 17, 2010. |
Takehi Moriguchi, et al. “Metal-modified silica adsorbents for removal of humic substances in water.” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 283, 2005 300-310, See Abstract, pp. 301 and 304. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2009/055090, dated Jul. 16, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/IB2009/055092, dated Jul. 16, 2010. |
Kuo et al., “Nano-particles dispersion effect on Ni/AI2O3 Composite Coatings,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, 86: 5-10 (2004). |
Sivakumar et al., “Preparation of nanosized TiO2 supported on activated alumina by a sonochemical method: observation of an increased photocatalytic decolourisation efficiency,” Research on Chemical Intermediates, 30(7-8): 785-792 (2004). |
Non-final Office action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,210 on Jun. 28, 2010. |
Non-final Office action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,210 on Dec. 1, 2010. |
Final Office action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,140 Dec. 1, 2010. |
Non-final Office Action submitted U.S. Appl. No. 12/704,058 dated Dec. 9, 2010. |
Non-final Office Action submitted in U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,183 dated Oct. 13, 2010. |
Compton R G et al., “Electrode Processes at the Surfaces of Sonotrodes,” Electrochimica ACTA, vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 315-320 (Feb. 1, 1996). |
Extended European Search Report received in EP Patent Application No. 08789246.9 mailed Nov. 30, 2011. |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/966,458, dated Mar. 17, 2011. |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/530,183, dated Mar. 22, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 111966,472, dated Mar. 31, 2011. |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/335,231, dated Mar. 31, 2011. |
Barbaglia et al., “Search of Fusion Reactions During the Cavitation of a Single Bubble in Deuterated Liquids,” Physica Scripta 72, pp. 75-78 (2005). |
Non-final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,151 mailed Dec. 8, 2010. |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/966,418 mailed Jan. 12, 2011. |
Extended European Search Report received in EP Patent Application No. 08789248.5 dated Nov. 30, 2011. |
EP Office Action for Patent Application No. 08 789 248.5-2104 dated Sep. 4, 2012; 4 pages. |
Chinese First Office Action for Patent Application No. 200880123174.X dated Sep. 20, 2012; 8 pages. |
Chinese First Office Action for Patent Application No. 200880123172.0 dated Oct. 10, 2012; 9 pages. |
EP Office Action for Patent Application No. 08 789 246.9-2104 dated Sep. 4, 2012; 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received in EP Patent Application No. 08868425 dated Feb. 14, 2012. |
Chinese First Office Action for Patent Application No. 200880123165.0 dated Oct. 10, 2012; 9 pages. |
Non-final Office action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/335,176 (Jun. 6, 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090165223 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |