Process for applying perfume to dryer sheets

Abstract
A process for applying relatively volatile or heat sensitive ingredients, such as perfume, to fabric dryer sheets minimizes the loss of the ingredients to the atmosphere or through degradation.
Description




BACKGROUND




A well known commercial product in the laundry care industry is the fabric dryer sheet. In use, the consumer typically uses at least one sheet in the drying cycle of the laundering process. The sheets generally include a substrate material, such as a web, wherein the substrate carries one or more ingredients to impart desired benefits to the clothing. These ingredients can include, for example, perfumes, anti-static agents, dye transfer inhibitors, whitening agents, enzymes, stain repellents and wrinkle reducing agents.




Processes for fabricating these dryer sheets are also well known. In a typical process, a large role of the web material is guided at high speeds through various coating, smoothing and drying/cooling steps wherein one or more ingredients are applied to the web. An example of this process is shown in FIG.


1


.




With reference to

FIG. 1

, web


5


is preferably a polyester material and provided in rolls


2


. Rolls


2


are typically about 37 inches to about 85 inches in width and have a length between about 8,000 and about 13,000 yards. Web


5


passes through various rollers and rods wherein ingredients are applied to the web. As shown, web


5


is passed over guide roll


12


and onto applicator roll


14


. Applicator roll


14


transfers ingredients


17


from coating pan


15


onto the web. A holding tank (not shown) can be used to supply the ingredients to coating pan


15


. Preferably, automatic controls are used to ensure a proper level and temperature of ingredients


17


in pan


15


.




As known in the art, ingredients


17


can include perfume material in addition to other fabric treatment agents, particularly those that provide anti-static and fabric softening benefits. These fabric treatment agents can include, for example: cationic compounds, such as quarternary ammonium compounds; nonionic surfactants, such as ethoxylated alcohols; fatty alcohols; fatty acids; alkali metal soaps of fatty acids; carboxylic acids and salts thereof; fatty acid esters; glycerides; waxes; anionic surfactants; water; optical brighteners; fluorescent agents; antioxidants; colorants; germacides; perfumes; bacteriocides; enzymes; dye transfer inhibitors; soil release polymers; skin care benefit agents; perfume carriers (e.g. starch, clyclodextrins); wrinkle reducing agents; and the like. Various preferred non-cationic formulations are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,133,226, filed Apr. 4, 1997, the contents of which is incorporated by reference. In prior art processes, perfume has been present from about 2 wt % to about 6 wt % based on total ingredients


17


.




In a preferred embodiment, the ingredients are maintained at approximately 140-190° F. in both the holding tank and coating pan


15


. At this temperature, one or more ingredients can be lost to the atmosphere due to their volatility or be adversely affected by means of thermal degradation. When the perfume is present, it is estimated that there is a loss of approximately 15 wt. % of the perfume to the atmosphere at this coating step.




Further on in the process of

FIG. 1

, after coated in the coating pan, coated web


5


′ passes over smoothing rod


18


to guide roll


20


. From guide roll


20


, the web passes to heating drum


22


, travels to cooling drums


24


and


26


, which are preferably cooled to below about 100° F. by chilled water. Cooled web


5


′ then passes to trimming station


28


, wherein the web is rolled and preferably cut into roles


2


′. Roles


2


′ are preferably about 12 inches in width. At this point in the process, the roles can be stored for later cutting and packaging. During the process shown in

FIG. 1

, the web can travel as fast as 1,000 feet per minute. It is estimated that the additional perfume lost after the step of coating can be in the range of approximately 20 wt. % to 30 wt. % from that which was originally present in pan


15


.




Turning to

FIG. 2

, final processing of coated web


5


′ is carried out by passing one or more of the coated roles


2


′ through a series of guide rollers


32


. The web is then folded by folders


34


, passed to conveyor


36


and cut by knife


38


. After cutting, the folded sheets are tamped down, stacked and accumulated for packaging.




During the above-described processes, it has been found that a significant amount of volatile agents can be lost prior to final packaging, particularly perfumes. This is generally due to the relatively high volatility of most perfume agents. For example, it has been found that up to 45% of the perfume added in a typical process can be lost by the time the dryer sheet is folded and packaged.




Therefore, there is a need for an improved fabric dryer sheet manufacturing process wherein the loss of volatile agents during the process of making the fabric sheets is minimized.




Perfume agents can be classified by their relative volatility. High volatile perfumes are known as “high notes” while relatively unvolatile perfumes are known as “low notes”. Due to their high volatility, high note perfumes are typically more perceptible by humans than low note perfumes. High note perfumes also have a wider range of odors and. therefore, allow for greater flexibility when selecting perfume agents. Unfortunately, when manufacturing dryer sheets, it is the desired high notes that can be lost during processing. This has resulted in a decreased amount of high note perfumes making it into the packaged product and alteration of the perfume profile. Use of high note perfumes have also been reduced or eliminated from perfume formulations due to the above-described process conditions.




Therefore, there is also a need for fabric sheet manufacturing techniques that would allow for increased usage of high note perfumes, wherein the highly volatile perfumes are retained on the fabric sheet so as to reach the consumer.




SUMMARY




For simplicity, “perfume” will be used herein to describe a fabric treatment agent that can volatilize or degrade from heat in an undesirable manner. It is within the scope of the present disclosure, however, that other volatile agents or heat sensitive agents can be advantageously applied by the presently disclosed process.




The present disclosure relates to a process that minimizes the loss of perfume and other volatile agents during the fabrication of dryer sheets. It has been found that it is possible to de-couple the addition of volatile or heat sensitive agents from one or more of the manufacturing process steps, particularly those portions that run at a high speed and/or high temperature.




In one preferred embodiment, the a selected agent or agents are applied during high speed web movement after high temperature application of other ingredients. In a second preferred embodiment, the selected agent or agents can be applied just prior to folding and packaging.




It has been found, for example, that by adding the perfume or other volatile agents closer to the step of packaging, i.e. after application of other ingredients in coating pan


15


, there is less loss of ingredients to the atmosphere during the dryer sheet process. In the case of perfumes, this new process has less affect on the perfume profile and, therefore, a wider variety of perfumes can be used. In addition, because ingredients are no longer lost or lost to a lesser extent, less of the ingredient is needed when practicing the present disclosure, resulting in raw material cost savings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

illustrates a fabric sheet coating process that is known in the art;





FIG. 2

illustrates a fabric sheet cutting and folding process that is known in the art;





FIG. 3

illustrates a fabric sheet coating process that generally shows a preferred location of applying fabric treatment agents, subsequent to the main coating operation;





FIG. 4

illustrates a fabric sheet cutting and folding process that generally shows preferred locations of applying fabric treatment agents, subsequent to the main coating operation;





FIG. 5

, illustrates a preferred method and apparatus for applying fabric treatment agents to a substrate material that can be used in the processes shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

;





FIG. 6

illustrates an alternate, preferred method and apparatus for applying fabric treatment agents to a substrate material that can be used in the processes shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

;





FIG. 7

illustrates a preferred method of transferring liquid agents to the apparatus of

FIG. 6

; and





FIG. 8

illustrates a fabric sheet cutting and folding process that shows the apparatus of

FIG. 6

at preferred locations.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




With reference to

FIGS. 3 and 4

, processes in accordance with the present disclosure are shown.

FIG. 3

shows preferred fabric treatment agent application zone A, wherein ingredients can be added to web


5


′ subsequent to the coating of ingredients


17


. Zone A is located after cooling drums


24


and


26


before cutting station


28


. By applying perfumes and/or other fabric treatment agents at or near zone A, the high temperatures associated with the upstream coating operation are avoided. In addition, because web


5


′ is rolled-up at trimming station


28


shortly after application zone A, the fabric treatment ingredients become trapped as web


5


′ winds about itself.





FIG. 4

shows an alternate, preferred application zones B. In this embodiment, the fabric treatment agents are applied in prior to final folding and cutting of the substrate. Several zones are shown because the preferred process performs several cutting and folding operations simultaneously. An advantage of waiting to apply certain fabric treatment agents just prior to cutting and folding is that roles


2


′ can be generic across several brands. More specifically, for example, if the only difference between two or more brands of product is the type or quantity of perfume, rolled stock


2


′ can be used for each brand as needed.




Turning to

FIG. 5

, a preferred apparatus for applying fabric treatment agents to web


5


′ is shown. Spray assemblies


80


have controllers


81


and air flow modules


82


for controlling the flow and spray pattern of liquid spray


83


emitted from nozzles N. Spray assemblies


80


can be pressure spray assemblies or, more preferably, ultrasonic sprayers as shown. Preferred ultrasonic spray assemblies are available from Sono-Tek Corporation, Milton, N.Y. The Sono-Tek sprayers use ultrasonic power to atomize liquids. The flow of liquid from nozzles N and the flow of air from modules


82


are regulated by controllers


81


. Controllers


81


can be programmed to apply more or less liquid agent and can be coupled to web speed information so as to apply predetermined, uniform quantities of fabric treatment agent. While three spray assemblies or shown, one or more can be used, depending on the width of web


5


′ and on the width of the spray. Spray assemblies can be used in zones A or B of

FIGS. 3 and 4

, respectively.




With reference to

FIGS. 6 and 7

, an alternate preferred apparatus for applying fabric treatment agents web


5


′ is shown. In

FIG. 6

, the perfume applicator generally includes tubular member


50


having a plurality of micro holes


52


. Web


5


′ is directed past the applicator by one or more guide rolls


54


. The number and configuration of guide rolls


54


is not critical and could even be eliminated.




Liquid fabric treatment agent is preferably pumped into applicator


50


by means of a metering pump


60


associated with tank


70


. As shown, the liquid passes through tube


58


, into one end of applicators


50


. Most preferably, the liquid is pumped into applicators


50


through a manifold (not shown) that directs the liquid into each end of the applicators


50


. Such a system can provide a more uniform pressure profile within applicator


50


. Applicators


50


are preferably fabricated from a low friction material that can apply the fabric treatment agents to the web as it contacts tubular member/applicator


50


and passes over the micro holes. While two rows of micro holes are shown, various combinations of holes, slits or other orifice that allow the liquid to exit the applicator can be used. Applicators


50


can be used in zones A or B of

FIGS. 3 and 4

, respectively.

FIG. 8

shows several applicators similar to

FIG. 6

in use prior to the steps of cutting and folding.




In a preferred process where one or more of the fabric treatment applicators are used to apply perfume at least between about 50% to about 75% by weight of the total perfume in the final product is added after the high temperature coating operation. In a most preferred process about 95% to about 100% by weight of the total perfume in the final product is added after the high temperature coating operation.




By applying certain fabric treatment agents at either or both zone A and zone B, the need for changing and cleaning ingredients


17


in coat pan


15


can be eliminated, allowing for manufacturing efficiencies.




In practice it was unexpectedly found that the post-added perfume could absorb into the dryer sheet material that was processed as shown in FIG.


1


. By absorbing, the sheet remained “non-tacky”, and processing, such as cutting and packaging, were not hindered. See example 2, below.




EXAMPLE 1




An 11 inch by 6.75 inch polyester substrate was first coated with 1.392 grams of antistatic/softening agent on a bench-top coater. Subsequently, 0.058 grams of perfume (4% by weight, excluding the weight of the substrate) was sprayed onto the coated sheet. This sheet and a typical production sheet were analysed by a HeadSpace GC. The production sheet was produced using the process shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, i.e. without de-coupling the perfume from the coating step. The perfume level in ingredients


17


dosed into coat pan


15


was also initially 4% by weight. The analysis data is shown in the following table.















TABLE 1










Perfume added,




Perfume remaining,







Sample




g




g




Perfume Loss, %


























Lab Sample




0.058




0.055




5.0






Production




0.058




0.033




42.5






sheet














The data indicates that the new process has improved the perfume retention. Therefore, for example, if the final product sold to the consumer only needs 0.033 g of perfume to deliver the expected perfume benefit, the methods disclosed herein allow for the addition of only 0.0347 g of perfume per sheet to deliver the same/expected amount—more than 40% reduction in perfume use.




EXAMPLE 2




An 11-inch wide dryer sheet roll was coated with anti-static/softening agent and perfume via the production process of FIG.


1


. The role was mounted on a pilot scale coater. An applicator device as shown in

FIG. 6

was set to contact the web of dryer sheet between unwind and rewind rolls. The roll was unwound and rewound at the speed of 10 ft/min while a pump was pumping perfume with the flow rate of 1.03 g/min onto the coated web. The addition of perfume is equal to extra 4% of perfume added to the sheet. The sheets with the extra 4% perfume made by this method showed a minimal increase of tackiness. Thus, the process was demonstrated.



Claims
  • 1. A process for fabricating dryer sheets comprising:providing a rolled web, said web comprising a material suitable for retaining fabric treatment ingredients; unrolling a portion of the rolled web; applying fabric treatment ingredients to the unrolled web portion in a first coating step; applying perfume to the unrolled web in a second step; and cutting and boxing at least a portion of the treated and perfumed web; wherein at least 50% by weight of the total perfume in the final boxed web is applied in the second step and the perfume is dispensed on to the unrolled web with a tubular member having a plurality of orifices or by spraying the perfume onto the unrolled web.
  • 2. The process according to claim 1, wherein no perfume is applied in the first coating step.
  • 3. The process according to claim 1, wherein the second step is carried out by applying liquid perfume to the web.
  • 4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the second step comprises contacting at least a portion of the web with the tubular member that dispenses perfume.
  • 5. The process according to claim 4, wherein the second step comprises the steps of: providing a generally tubular member, causing perfume to flow from an inner portion of the generally tubular member to an outer portion of the generally tubular member; and causing the unrolled web portion to come in contact with the perfume by passing the fabric dryer sheet over a portion of the outer portion of the generally tubular member.
  • 6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the second step requires spraying and is carried out by providing at least one ultrasonic liquid applicator that is designed to spray by atomizing liquid perfume.
  • 7. The process according to claim 1, wherein the step of applying fabric treatment ingredients comprises applying ingredients selected from the group consisting of: fabric softening agents; anti-static agents; dye transfer inhibitors; whitening agents; enzymes; stain repellents; wrinkle reducing agents and mixtures thereof.
  • 8. In a process of applying ingredients to a fabric dryer sheet substrate including a first step of coating one or more ingredients onto the dryer sheet, the improvement comprising:applying perfume to the dryer sheet in a second step that is separate and distinct from said first step, said second step comprising providing an ultrasonic liquid applicator that atomizes and sprays liquid perfume onto the dryer sheet substrate or said second step comprises contacting the dryer sheet substrate with a tubular member that dispenses perfume.
PRIORITY

This application claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 60/130,773 filed Apr. 23, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (12)
Number Name Date Kind
3632396 Perez-Zamora Jan 1972
4073996 Bedenk et al. Feb 1978
4118525 Jones Oct 1978
4242377 Roberts et al. Dec 1980
4375005 Boden Feb 1983
4619779 Hardy Oct 1986
4752422 Uchida et al. Jun 1988
5234610 Gardlik et al. Aug 1993
5246603 Tsaur et al. Sep 1993
5425887 Lam et al. Jun 1995
5500137 Bacon et al. Mar 1996
5656584 Angell et al. Aug 1997
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/130773 Apr 1999 US