The present invention relates to a process for assembling at least two metal parts in order to create a structure, at least one of the two parts having a very high elastic limit, and to its use for producing (girder) structures of complex form from simple parts, that do not require large deformations.
In the field of mechanical construction and in particular in the automotive field, the objective is to substantially reduce the weight of structures by using the least possible amount of metal. These structures, for example motor vehicle chassis, are obtained by assembling often complex components, performed by drawing.
In order to reduce the thickness of the metal used to produce these structures, while at the same time conserving their mechanical properties, steels with high mechanical characteristics are to be used. Grades of low alloy carbon steels with high mechanical characteristics are nowadays available, but are often associated with a very limited formability by deformation.
To clarify matters, we will differentiate these steels according to their elastic limit (EL) in the remainder of the description:
Typically, the steels to which this patent application is related have an elastic limit of between 400 and 1500 MPa. These steels are produced by bulk metallurgical processes that are known per se, which allow to offer steels at a cost price close to that of standard carbon steels. The advantage then lies in the fact that an appreciable lightening of the structure can be obtained. However, on account of their low formability and a sometimes poor weldability, these steels pose specific problems in terms of implementation, and in particular of assembly.
More particularly, the constituent parts of a same structure often have complex forms obtained by drawing processes which involve large deformations, and are thus incompatible with the low formability characteristics of these steels.
The process of mechanical hem crimping or the like is well known, for example for assembling parts such as ladders in the field of metal joinery. Thus, document U.S. Pat. No. 4,356,888 describes a structural joint for two parts, preferably made of malleable and deformable metal, such as aluminium. According to one particular embodiment, the first part has an elongated tongue and a short tongue. These two tongues define a cavity capable of receiving the second part at the level of a curved tab on a support such as a wire. When the two parts are pressed together using a suitable tool, the tongues and the tab are deformed and interpenetrate. The elongated tongue forms at least partially a circular loop around the tab, thus making any subsequent stripping impossible.
In the same field of application, document U.S. Pat. No. 3,854,185 proposes a process for forming a structural joint between two rigid parts, one having a flange with a protruding end on one face, and the other having an essentially circular groove. By pressing the two pieces against one another with sufficient force, the flange penetrates into the groove while becoming deformed. More specifically, the assembly is performed by securely LA fastening the flange to the groove, the flange forming a winding in said groove.
Document DE-C-385 642 proposes a machine for crimp assembling two plate metal parts in order to form a hollow body.
Document FR-A-2 321 962 proposes a process for crimp assembling a zinc part and a lead part in order to solve the sealing problems which arise in the field of construction roofing.
The present invention aims to propose a process for assembling at least two, constituent metal parts or components, at least one of which is made of a steel with a very high elastic limit associated with low formability, in order to produce structural components of complex form from simpler components which may be produced by means of forming operations essentially of the bending type, which does not involve any large deformations in the plane of the metal plate and is thus compatible with steels having high mechanical characteristics.
Indeed, within a given family of alloys, steels for example, or alternatively aluminium alloys, the higher the elastic limit, the lower the ductility. The level of the elastic limit associated with this low formability depends on the alloy family taken into consideration; thus, this limit may be from 600 to 800 MPa for steels, depending on the grade taken into consideration. Beyond that limit, the steels can only be draw-formed with great difficulty: deformations in the plane of the plate metal by broad tension or expansion will rapidly lead to its breaking. The resilience also makes it very difficult to comply with the geometry of the component. On the other hand, these steels retain deformability by bending. However, since the limiting bend radius is several times the thickness, assembly by crimping is virtually impossible.
However, these steels are of potential value for improving metal structures and in particular motor vehicle structures. They allow to reduce the weight for equivalent performance or even to improve the performance for equivalent weight.
It is therefore important to be able to produce components in complex forms from these metals with high mechanical characteristics, which is the object of the present invention.
The present invention relates to a process for assembling at least two simple sheet metal parts, in order to create a structural component of open cross section, preferably U-shaped, or of closed cross section, at least one of said metal parts having a high or very high elastic limit and low formability, characterized in that:
At least one of the parts is preferably made of a steel with an elastic limit of more than 400 MPa or of an aluminium alloy with an elastic limit of more than 200 MPa.
Advantageously, the ratio of the hem radius to the sum of the thicknesses of the various parts one wishes to assemble along the junction section is between 2 and 10.
Furthermore, the ratio of the difference between the radius of the hem and the thickness of the outermost metal with the thickness of the innermost metal is advantageously greater than 2.
The nature or thickness of the various parts may not be identical for all the parts.
The process is also characterized in that the junction is not necessarily rectilinear but may have a local curvature, the radius of curvature preferably being greater than five external hem radii.
The assembly process according to the invention is also characterized in that, after the hem crimping operation, blocking of said hem with respect to the sliding of its parts along the junction section is achieved by bonding, indentation or imbrication.
The present invention also relates to the product obtained by the assembly process described above, characterized in that it is in the form of at least two metal parts having a hem along a junction section.
In a first preferred embodiment of the invention, the product is in the form of a two-web I-shaped girder, obtained by assembling four constituent parts connected by four hems along the junction section of the four parts taken in pairs.
In a second preferred embodiment of the invention, the product results from the assembly of two parts by two hems so as to form a closed cross section, at least one of the two parts having a U-shaped cross section.
The process of the invention thus allows to obtain structural components of complex form from sheet metal materials having, on the one hand, a high to very high elastic limit, and, on the other hand, limited formability. The latter is not a constraint as regards preparatory operations for the assembly process, such as bending, involving little deformation in the plane of the metal plate. This process thus allows to obtain components with a geometry which is equivalent to that obtained by drawing. Furthermore, hem assembling is compatible with the low formability of these steels, the working radius being several times the thickness, which is not the case for simple crimping, for example.
Another advantage of the invention is that the process of hem assembling or hem crimping, which is purely mechanical, allows to set aside the possible problems of weldability of steels with high mechanical characteristics.
An additional advantage of the invention is that it proposes a process for producing reinforced structural components, in particular in the motor vehicle industry.
Finally, the process of the invention, which uses a simple press for the assembly, is a cost-efficient process.
The basic idea of the invention is to break down a structural component of complex form, usually made by draw-forming operations that are relatively incompatible with steels having high mechanical characteristics, into simple sub-components, made by forming operations such as bending, and hem-assembled.
The present invention will be described in greater detail by means of the enclosed figures.
The principle according to the present invention proposed for producing this type of component is illustrated in FIG. 2. The component is broken down into simple components, the sides 1 and 2 and the bottom 3 which are assembled by means of a hem 4.
The components 1, 2 and 3 may be obtained by folding or by bending the edge. These forming techniques only involve small deformations in the plane of the metal plate and are compatible with steels with a very high elastic limit and low formability.
The left half-view shows the closed tool, before producing the hem, and the right half-view shows the tool once the hem has been completed. The parts 7, 7′ and 9 come to bear on the top slide of the press by means of springs, which are not shown, and whose compression travel is greater than the travel of the tools 8, 8′ forming the hem. In the situation shown in
All components 1, 2 and 3 are not necessarily made of steel with a high elastic limit: for example, depending on the function of the component, it is possible for only the component 3 to be made of steel with a very high elastic limit, the steel components 1 and 2 having better formability and better weldability, thus allowing the component to be readily assembled onto the rest of the structure by means of assembly processes such as spot welding. The process also allows to adapt the thicknesses to the structural requirements of the component: the three components 1, 2 and 3 may have different thicknesses, the hem assembly process accepting substantially different thicknesses, the ratio of which is greater than two.
Orientation variants of the hemming are shown in FIG. 4.
The process also allows to produce closed cross sections as indicated in FIG. 5. According to
A typical set of tools for producing this type of component is shown in FIG. 6. The principle is similar to that described in FIG. 3. The parts 14, 14′ and 15 come to bear on the top slide of the press by means of springs, that are not shown.
The part 15 holds the components 10 and 11 against the part 17-17′ which rests on the lower table of the press.
In the left-hand side of the figure, the situation before the formation of the hem is shown: the press slide has brought the parts 14 and 15 into contact, the springs being slightly compressed. The right-hand view shows the situation after forming the hem: the press slide has continued its travel and the part 16′, which is directly connected thereto, has formed the hem.
Another possible embodiment of a closed structure is based on assembling the components by means of four hems. A typical cross section corresponding to this application is shown in FIG. 7. The components 22 and 22′ are hem-assembled with the components 21 and 21′.
The potential applications relate to different types of motor vehicle structural components, for instance body reinforcing components (shield crossbeam), b-pillars, side rail components or engine mounts. Some of these applications are illustrated in
The technique allows to produce structures of complex form with steels of very low ductility by taking advantage of the production efficiency of the hem assembly process and of the reinforcement it provides to the structure. It also allows to form metal tongues at the ends of the parts, enabling these components to be readily assembled onto the rest of the motor vehicle structure (FIG. 11).
The hem assembly ensures very good maintenance of metals in the plane perpendicular to the axis of the hem. However, there is an appreciable risk that the assembled parts may slide in the axis of the hem or at least in the longitudinal direction, if the hem is not rectilinear. This drawback may be readily solved, for example by placing an adhesive between the two sheets of metal at the hem, by producing welds by local fusion or, preferably, by locally crushing the hem with a press tool comprising, for example, a V-shaped punch with a rounded end and a flat anvil. This operation may be performed in a highly efficient manner with a press: a set of tools may be designed to simultaneously perform the indentations, the indentation pitch being of the order of 5 to 10 times the outside diameter of the hem.
Alternate serrated cut-outs may also be made in the two metal sheets in the region to be hem-assembled so as to ensure longitudinal blocking (FIG. 12). These cut-outs are made during the steps of manufacturing these components by press. The teeth 20 have a height that is less than the circumference of the hem, for example one-third of this circumference. The width of the teeth 20 is slightly less than that of the gaps 21 between the teeth. During the hem-assembling of the two metal sheets, the teeth of the plate closest to the axis of the hem are imbricated in the space between the teeth of the outer metal sheet, thus producing blocking in the axis of the hem.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
99202194 | Jul 1999 | EP | regional |
This is a nationalization of PCT/BE00/00080 filed Jul. 5, 2000 and published in French.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTBE00/00080 | 7/5/2000 | WO | 00 | 1/4/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0102110 | 1/11/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2054703 | Little | Sep 1936 | A |
2125692 | Ragsdale | Aug 1938 | A |
2129624 | Rafter | Sep 1938 | A |
2818272 | DeLay | Dec 1957 | A |
3151767 | Nakata | Oct 1964 | A |
3716895 | Fohr | Feb 1973 | A |
3854185 | Reid | Dec 1974 | A |
4055133 | Wessely | Oct 1977 | A |
4190160 | Andersen et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4193247 | Heckelsberg | Mar 1980 | A |
4356888 | Steenberg | Nov 1982 | A |
4554718 | Ollinger et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4982487 | Maruko et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5238146 | Thorne, Jr. | Aug 1993 | A |
5327631 | Lincavage | Jul 1994 | A |
5383346 | Laffler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5603153 | Zmyslowski | Feb 1997 | A |
6041564 | Shirey | Mar 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
385642 | May 1922 | DE |
2321962 | Mar 1977 | FR |