This invention relates generally to a process for enhancing the properties of functionalized POSS monomers for incorporation into polymeric and biological products.
Nanostructured chemicals are best exemplified by those based on low-cost Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxanes (POSS) and Polyhedral Oligomeric Silicates (POS). POSS systems contain hybrid (i.e. organic-inorganic) compositions in which the internal cage like framework is primarily comprised of inorganic silicon-oxygen bonds. The exterior of the nanostructure is covered by both reactive and nonreactive organic functionalities (R), which ensure compatibility and tailorability of the nanostructure with organic monomers and polymers. These and other properties and features of nanostructured chemicals are discussed in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,053 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,867, both of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Current-engineering practices produce functionalized POSS molecules in high yield but certain microelectronic, medical, and biological applications require higher-purity or chemical functionalities that are not readily or economically produced using the prior art. Prior art methods include the use of hydroxide base, anionic salts, and protic, acid catalysts in the assembly of POSS cages and their functionalization (see U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/631,892 and 10/186,318, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,770,724; 6,660,823; 6,596,821; and 3,390,163). While these approaches are known to be generally effective, they are limited in that both protic acids and hydroxide bases can also catalyze the self-condensation of POSS individual cages into oligomerized POSS cage containing resins (
Consequently a need exists for improvement upon the prior art methods of POSS cage assembly and functionalized monomers. An improved process yielding, higher purity, and molecularly precise POSS systems is described.
The present invention provides an improved synthesis process for polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes which produces rapidly, in high yield, low resin content, and solvent free, monomer products suitable for use in polymerization, grafting and alloying applications. The synthesis process uses phosphazene superbases in reaction with silane coupling agents of the formula R1SiX3 to form POSS cages functionalized with silanols of the formula types [(R1SiO1.5)7(HOSiO1.5)1]Σ8, [(R1SiO1.5)6(R1HOSiO1)2]Σ8, [(R1SiO1.5)2(R1HOSiO1)4]Σ6, [(R1SiO1.5)4(R1HOSiO1)3]Σ7. The synthesis process can also involve the reaction of phosphazene superbases in reaction with silane coupling agents of the type R2SiX3 to form polyfunctional POSS cages functionalized with R2 groups of the formula types [(R2SiO1.5)6]Σ6, [(R2SiO1.5)8]Σ8, [(R2SiO1.5)10]Σ10, [(R2SiO1.5)12]Σ12 and larger sized cages.
Alternately the phosphazene superbases can be reacted with POSS silanols of the formula [(R1SiO1.5)7(HOSiO1.5)1]Σ8, [(R1SiO1.5)6(R1HOSiO1)2]Σ8, [(R1SiO1.5)4(R1HOSiO1)3]Σ7 in the presence of a silane coupling agent of the formula R2R3R4SiX, R2R3SiX2, or R2SiX3 for sufficient time in the presence of a solvent and superbase where the elimination of HX occurs and renders a monofunctional POSS monomer of the formula [(R1SiO1.5)8(R2R3R4SiO1)]Σ9, [((R1SiO1.5)8)2(R2R3SiO2)]Σ17, [((R1SiO1.5)8)3(R2SiO3)]Σ25, [(R1SiO1.5)6(R1SiO1.5)2(R2R3R4SiO)2]Σ10, [(R1SiO1.5)6(R1SiO1)2(R2R3SiO2)]Σ9, [(R1SiO1.5)6(R1HOSiO1)1(R2R3SiO)]Σ8, [(R1SiO1.5)6(R1(R2R3R4SiO)SiO1)(R2R3SiO)]Σ9, [(R1SiO1.5)4(R1(R2R3R4SiO)SiO1)3]Σ10, [(R1SiO1.5)7(R2SiO1.5)1]Σ8, respectively. The resulting monomer is essentially free of impurities and has controllable properties through selection of composition, R groups, and nanostructure size and topology. Highly purified nanostructured POSS monomers are desirable as they exhibit improved filtration capability, reduced contamination and viscosity, more reliable polymerization, lower cost and waste reduction over impure systems.
A preferred process involves the reaction of POSS silanols of the formula [(R1SiO1.5)7(HOSiO1.5)1]Σ8, [(R1SiO1.5)6(R1HOSiO1)2]Σ8, [(R1SiO1.5)4(R1HOSiO1)3]Σ7 with a silane coupling agent of the formula, R2R3R4SiX, R2R3SiX2, R2SiX3 in the presence of a solvent and superbase.
For the purposes of understanding this invention's chemical compositions the following definition for formula representations of Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) and Polyhedral Oligomeric Silicate (POS) nanostructures is made.
Polysilsesquioxanes are materials represented by the formula [RSiO1.5]∞ where ∞ represents molar degree of polymerization and R=represents organic substituent (H, siloxy, cyclic or linear aliphatic or aromatic groups that may additionally contain reactive functionalities such as alcohols, esters, amines, ketones, olefins, ethers or halides or which may contain fluorinated groups). Polysilsesquioxanes may be either homoleptic or heteroleptic. Homoleptic systems contain only one type of R group while heteroleptic systems contain more than one type of R group.
POSS and POS nanostructure compositions are represented by the formula:
[(RSiO1.5)n]Σ# for homoleptic compositions
[(RSiO1.5)n(R′SiO1.5)m]Σ# for heteroleptic compositions (where R≠R′)
[(RSiO1.5)n(RXSiO1.0)m]Σ# for functionalized heteroleptic compositions (where R groups can be equivalent or in equivalent)
In all of the above R is the same as defined above and X includes but is not limited to OH, Cl, Br, I, alkoxide (OR), formate (OCH), acetate (OCOR), acid (OCOH), ester (OCOR), peroxide (OOR), amine (NR2) isocyanate (NCO), and R. The symbols m and n refer to the stoichiometry of the composition. The symbol Σ indicates that the composition forms a nanostructure and the symbol # refers to the number of silicon atoms contained within the nanostructure. The value for # is usually the sum of m+n, where n ranges typically from 1 to 24 and m ranges typically from 1 to 12. It should be noted that Σ# is not to be confused as a multiplier for determining stoichiometry, as it merely describes the overall nanostructural characteristics of the system (aka cage size).
The present invention teaches an improved method of synthesis for POSS nanostructured chemicals yielding a higher purity and lower cost product than previously described.
The key feature of the invention is the use of phosphazene superbases to catalyze the assembly of POSS cages. A range of phosphazenes are applicable and include polyphosphazenes which vary in molecular weight and composition. Phosphazene oligomers and molecules are preferentially utilized and in particular P1 type P(NtBu)(NH2)3, P2 type (H2N)3P═N—P(NH2)4, P3 type (H2N)3P═N—P(NH2)—N═P(NH2)3, P4 type (H2N)3P═N—P(NH2)3═N—P(NH2)3—N═P(NH2)3. The basicity of phosphazene superbases increase with increasing number of phosphorous atoms and this provides a valuable tool in the utility of this reagent. The preferred concentration of superbase relative to trisilanol is 2 mol % but a useful range includes 0.1 mol % to 10 mol %.
General Process Variables Applicable To All Processes
As is typical with chemical processes there are a number of variables that can be used to control the purity, selectivity, rate and mechanism of any process. Variables influencing the process include the size, polydispersity, and composition of the nanostructured chemical, separation and isolation methods, and use of catalyst or cocatalysts, solvents and cosolvents. Additionally, kinetic and thermodynamic means of controlling the synthesis mechanism, rate, and product distribution are also known tools of the trade that can impact product quality and economics.
[(isobutylSiO1.5)4(isobutyl(OH)SiO1.0)3]Σ7 (688 g, 0.87 mole) was dissolved in THF followed by addition of methacrylpropyltrimethoxysilane (204 g, 0.87 mole) and the solution was cooled to 5° C. Phosphazene superbase (FW 234.32, 15.72 mmol) was then added and the mixture stirred at room temperature for 3 days. The solution was then quenched with acetic acid (1.5 g). Then 1 liter of methanol was added and the mixture was stirred and filtered. The solid was dried to render pure white product in 75% yield.
[(EtSiO1.5)4(Et(OH)SiO1.0)3]Σ7 (50 g, 84 mmole) was dissolved in methanol followed by addition of 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (19.86 g, 84 mmole) and the solution was cooled to 5° C. Phosphazene superbase (FW 234.32, 15.72 mmol) was then added and the mixture stirred for 3 days at 5° C. The solution was then quenched with acetic acid (87 mg) filtered, and volatiles removed and dried to render a solid. The solid washed with methanol (1400 ml) and dried to render 415 g of pure white product in 87% yield.
[(EtSiO1.5)4(Et(OH)SiO1.0)3]Σ7 (12 g, 20 mmole) was dissolved in methanol followed by addition of exo-norbornenylethyltrimethoxysilane (4.84 g, 20 mmole) and the solution was cooled to 5° C. Phosphazene superbase was then added and the mixture stirred for 2 days at 5° C. The solution was then quenched with acetic acid (87 mg) filtered, and volatiles removed, washed with additional methanol and dried to render a white product.
[(CyclohexylSiO1.5)4(Cyclohexyl(OH)SiO1.0)3]Σ7 (10 g, 10.3 mmole) was dissolved in THF followed by addition of 3-(N-aminoethyl)aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (2.32 g, 10.27 mmole) and phosphazene superbase (FW 234.32, 15.72 mmol) was then added and the mixture stirred at room temperature. The solution was then quenched with acetic acid methanol was added. The volatiles were removed and product dried to render a pure white solid in 62% yield.
[(PhenylSiO1.5)4(Phenyl(OH)SiO1.0)3]Σ7 (5.9 g, 6.3 mol) was dissolved in toluene followed by addition of (2.0 g, 11 mmol) 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane and was then stirred at room temperature for 12 hours. Acetonitrile was added and the solution was filtered and product dried to render a pure white solid in 40% yield.
While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for purposes of illustrating the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes in the methods and apparatus disclosed herein may be made without departing from the scope of the invention which is defined in the appended claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/659,722 Filed Mar. 7, 2005, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/225,607 filed Sep. 12, 2005 (which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/608,582 filed Sep. 10, 2004), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/166,008 filed Jun. 24, 2005, which is (a) a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/631,892 filed Aug. 14, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,312 (which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/147,435, filed Aug. 4, 1999); (b) a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/351,292, filed Jan. 23, 2003, now U.S. Patent No. 6,933,345 (which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/351,523, filed Jan. 23, 2002), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/818,265, filed Mar. 26, 2001, now U.S. Pat, No. 6,716,919 (which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent App1ication Ser. No. 60/192,083, filed Mar. 24, 2000); (c) a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/747,762, filed Dec. 21, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,911,518 (which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/171,888, filed Dec. 23, 1999); and (d) a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/186,318, filed Jun. 27, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,927,270 (which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/301,544, filed Jun. 27, 2001).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2801968 | Furby et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
3231499 | Smith | Jan 1966 | A |
3247111 | Oberright et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3278436 | Dazzi | Oct 1966 | A |
3280031 | Brennan et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3292180 | Axworthy | Dec 1966 | A |
3340286 | Schiefer et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3347791 | Thomson et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3390163 | Brown | Jun 1968 | A |
3673229 | Malec | Jun 1972 | A |
4483107 | Tomoyori et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4513132 | Shoji et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4900779 | Liebfried | Feb 1990 | A |
4946921 | Shirata et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5047491 | Saho et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5047492 | Weidner et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5190808 | Tenney et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5412053 | Lichtenhan et al. | May 1995 | A |
5457220 | Razzano | Oct 1995 | A |
5484867 | Lichtenhan et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5589562 | Lichtenhan et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5830950 | Katsoulis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855962 | Cote et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858544 | Banaszak Holl et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5939576 | Lichtenhan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942638 | Lichtenhan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6075068 | Bissinger | Jun 2000 | A |
6100417 | Lichtenhan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6245849 | Morales et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245926 | Charrin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252030 | Zanket et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6288904 | Yadav et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6329490 | Yamashita et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6596821 | Katsoulis et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6660823 | Lichtenhan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6770724 | Lichtenhan et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6927270 | Lichtenhan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6972312 | Lichtenhan et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
20030055193 | Lichtenhan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070232823 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60659722 | Mar 2005 | US | |
60608582 | Sep 2004 | US | |
60351523 | Jan 2002 | US | |
60301544 | Jun 2001 | US | |
60171888 | Dec 1999 | US | |
60147435 | Aug 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11225607 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 11371195 | US | |
Parent | 11166008 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11225607 | US | |
Parent | 10351292 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 11166008 | US | |
Parent | 10186318 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10351292 | US | |
Parent | 09818265 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10186318 | US | |
Parent | 09747762 | Dec 2000 | US |
Child | 09818265 | US | |
Parent | 09631892 | Aug 2000 | US |
Child | 09747762 | US |