1. Field of the Invention
The invention concerns processes for the production of butt joints.
2. Description of the Related Art
A butt joint of this type is known from EP 868 624 B1. In these known butt joints a connecting flange is formed unitarily, as one piece, in the material of the pipe end of each of the respective abutting pipe ends. In comparison to connecting flanges seated separately upon the pipe ends, such a design has great advantages, such as 0-leakage, low flow resistance and low noise generation, as well as improved ability to clean and improved hygiene, as a consequence of their flat internal walls. For these advantages one must however accept the following disadvantages. By the one piece forming on of the connecting flange, the wall thickness and therewith the stability of the connecting flange is necessarily correlated with the wall thickness of the pipe itself. If then higher demands are placed upon the stability of the flange connection, this can not be achieved without increasing the wall thickness of the pipe segment over its entire length, even though this thickening of the pipe itself was not even necessary. In the case of connecting flanges seated upon the pipe end, the wall thickness thereof accordingly also always represents a multiple of the pipe wall thickness.
This increasing of the wall thickness over the entire pipe length doubtless represents a great economical disadvantage, since the material costs represent a large proportion of the cost of manufacture of the pipe. There are also technical disadvantages, since the greater pipe wall thickness represents a greater pipe weight and this weight places greater stresses upon the suspension and the flange connection. The formed-on connecting flanges are often subjected to a strong axial pull-forces. Most often this occurs with vertical running pipelines, however it also occurs in horizontal pipelines as a consequence of the respectively selected separation between two sequential suspensions or free lengths of the pipe. In the case of strong axial pull-forces on a butt joint with connecting flanges formed as one piece on the pipes, it is often the curve apex (area at which the connecting flange and the straight pipe join) which is the weakest point. Upon overloading, there results therewith at this point a conical gap between the contacting connecting flanges. Such a gap destroys any advantage of the formed-on connecting flanges. The pipeline inner surface is no longer continuously flat or flush at this gap location. Fibers and dirt can collect and build up at the gap. Thereby the flow resistance, the noise formation and the ability to clean are made worse. Further, a greater leakage can only be prevented when a seal is applied to the outer flange edge. A pretensioning of the connecting flange by a stronger bending of the ring shaped flange part projecting from the flange beyond 90° brings about only a limited improvement of the flange stability.
This weakness can naturally be improved with the known, relatively new technique of “Tailored Blanks”. When using this technique short pipe pieces of thicker material can be welded to the ends of the pipe sections and the connecting flange can be formed therefrom. This possible embodiment is however completely uneconomical, since it would already be much simpler to weld on an already completely finished bent connecting flange.
According to the invention, a butt joint of the above-described type is to be so improved, that the flange thickness and pipe wall thickness can be decoupled and thereby the advantages of the formed-on connecting flange can remain unimpaired.
According to the invention the connecting flange formed directly onto the end of the pipe as one piece can be thickened in very simple manner, without increasing the sheet metal thickness of the pipe segment, essentially by sliding onto the outer side of the pipe a pipe-piece forming a reinforcing ring. Only after the sliding-on of the reinforcing pipe-piece is the connecting flange formed onto the pipe end together with the reinforcing ring. The result is a two-layer formed-on flange. Since the thickness of the reinforcing ring can be so selected on a case-by-case basis that the flange strength required for the particular application is ensured, there occurs an enormous material savings in comparison to having to thicken the pipe wall over the entire length. Following the forming of the connecting flange with reinforcing ring, the flange layer formed from the pipe wall always lies on the outside, so that the advantages, such as 0-leakage, flat pipe inner wall and flat flange surface, remain. The reinforcing ring need be selected in its thickness essentially on the basis such that even in the case of increased axial pull forces no gap between the connecting flanges can result.
The economy when using the invention results essentially from the great material savings, when the thickness of the pipe wall does not have to be increased. With relatively small additional effort, the reinforcing ring can be produced of sheet metal and slid onto the not-yet-processed pipe end. The forming on of the one pipe connecting flange, inclusive of the seated-on reinforcing ring, can be carried out without problem preferably by the so-called circular-pivot-bending process according to DE 100 47 310.5 even in the case of the strongest reinforcing ring.
The possibility of varying the reinforcement of the connecting flange without at the same time increasing the pipe wall thickness opens many new employment possibilities for the inventive butt joint. A number of preferred embodiments of the invention are thus placed under protection in the dependent claims. In particular the various designs of the connecting flange can be accomplished, for example with clamping surface running for example parallel to the pipe wall or conically, with one or more reinforcing rings, which can lie against various parts or against the entire connecting flange. It is in principle also possible that the pipe and reinforcing rings can be made of different materials, for example the pipe of aluminum sheet metal and the reinforcing ring of zinced steel or the like.
Various embodiments of the inventive butt joint are described in greater detail on the basis of the figures. There is shown:
In all figures the identical or similar parts are indicated with the same reference numbers.
As can be seen from
The outer end of each ring rim 14 transitions via a rounded area 22 respectively into a conical clamping flank 24 angled backwards and directed inwards towards the associated pipe wall 12. The inner end of each clamping flank 24 lying close to the pipe wall 12 transitions via a rounding off 26 respectively into a support flank 28 running spaced apart from the pipe wall 12 and parallel thereto and running towards the ring rim 14. On the outer side of each ring rim 14 or as the case may be on the outer side of each pipe wall 12 there lies respectively one outwardly projecting flank 44 or as the case may be parallel to the pipe wall 12 running flank 46 of an angled-off reinforcing ring 47, made of thicker sheet metal than the pipe wall 12.
The connecting flanges 32 lying against each other are pulled towards each other and placed under tension by a generally ring-shaped clamping ring 34 with channel-shaped cross-section and by tightening of the clamping ring 34, so that the pipe walls 12 are pressed axially tightly against each other along joint 16. The clamping of the clamping ring can occur rapidly in known manner, for example by tightening of a single screw. The clamping ring 34 shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, an annular strip-shaped elastic seal 40 is secured to the inner side of the channel floor 36, which in the tightened condition of the clamping ring 34 is pressed sealingly in the condition shown in
The longer of the two flanks 44 and 46 can be substantially freely selected, depending only upon situation of employment and strength requirements. The same applies for the respective employed shape of the formed-on connecting flange. Thus, for example, in the case of the embodiment according to
In the embodiment according to
In a further embodiment according to
Simpler embodiments of the connecting flange 32 with reinforcing ring 47 are shown in
The embodiment according to
Embodiments, wherein the reinforcing ring 47 extends over the entire length of the respective pipe segment or wherein two or more reinforcing rings are superimposed upon each other at the pipe end may not be shown in the figures, however can in extreme cases represent a suitable design within the framework of the patent claims, where particular strength requirements must be met or where the weight of the pipe segment is not a factor.
Particularly advantageous embodiments are produced when the respective pipe segment 10 is a double wall formed by the extension of the reinforcing ring 47 along the entire axial length of the pipe segment 10, in particular when, as shown in the embodiments according to
In the embodiment according to
Finally in the embodiment according to
Also in safety engineering multi-walled pipes are necessary, wherein for example the hollow space can be filled with a control fluid. The leakage of the control fluid can be used as an indicator for loss of integrity.
Multi-wall pipes of this type can also be advantageously be employed in refrigeration or air conditioning engineering.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 15 112 | Apr 2002 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/407,358, filed Apr. 4, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,073,826, B2 the entirety of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1225478 | Murray | May 1917 | A |
3239931 | Guarnaschelli | Mar 1966 | A |
3744115 | West | Jul 1973 | A |
3889581 | Bray, Sr. | Jun 1975 | A |
4466641 | Heilman et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4542923 | La Crosse et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4566724 | Arnoldt et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4809418 | Burli | Mar 1989 | A |
4822083 | Meinig | Apr 1989 | A |
4823908 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4865365 | Meinig | Sep 1989 | A |
5015018 | Arnoldt | May 1991 | A |
5129690 | Meinig et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133580 | Meinig | Jul 1992 | A |
5673947 | De Waal | Oct 1997 | A |
6109665 | Meinig | Aug 2000 | A |
6412519 | Goodhue | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6547287 | Shah et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584205 | Croft, III et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6850623 | Norris et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7073826 | Meinig | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20020041099 | Grun | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20040089043 | Meinig | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3537504 | Jul 1987 | DE |
100 47 310.5 | May 2002 | DE |
0025070 | Mar 1981 | EP |
0100580 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0616162 | Sep 1994 | EP |
561684 | May 1944 | GB |
61048695 | Mar 1986 | JP |
9189387 | Jul 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060186665 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10407358 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 11381306 | US |