Patent Application
20220135453
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 (a) and (b) to French Patent Application No, 2011316, filed Nov. 4, 2020, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to the field of the treatment of high pH waters, which pH it is desired to lower by injecting CO2, which is regarded as a weak diacid.
In order to do this, in general, in the absence of a contact basin/tank, the CO2 is injected more or less effectively into the water/the effluent in-line in a pipeline conveying the water/the effluent, by virtue of an injector, for example a simple pierced pipe or also an injector of more elaborate structure.
This is because it is known that, depending on the industrial installation under consideration, such a basin is not available and it is not possible to position one therein, essentially for lack of space.
It can then, under some conditions, be problematic to guarantee consistency of the treatment, by taking a pH measurement downstream of the injection: for example during start-up, or also during short-lived discharges or also during a sudden variation in the pH of the incoming effluent.
Currently, in this industry, the process is controlled by a pH measurement placed downstream of the injection. Regulation of the CO2 flow rate is carried out by an automaton/controller, which will adjust the CO2 flow rate depending on the result obtained, namely the difference between the pH measurement obtained and a desired value or setpoint.
Regulation can be more or less precise and reactive by virtue of conventional PID-type parametering, for example.
Thus:
The entire art of the designer will be to find the right method of regulation and to satisfactorily parameterize it in order to keep the value of corrected pH in the vicinity of the setpoint or at the setpoint for the maximum possible time.
Unfortunately, this can prove to be problematic, for example in the case where the operation is highly sequenced, that is to say, for example, when the effluent to be neutralized is sent by a pump into the pipeline where the injection of CO2 takes place with the pump being set going numerous times over short periods. The volume of effluent contained between the pump and the location of the probe making possible control of the pH and regulation of the injection will not be treated, this being the case at each start-up of the pump. If the pump is set going several times per hour, as is the case in numerous installations, where the pump is located in a small inspection hole and makes possible the discharge of the effluent into a drainage system, the volume accumulated on each start-up will not be treated, or in any case not correctly.
The present invention then attempts to provide a solution to the abovementioned technical problems, and thus to provide an improved process for the treatment of waters, employing an injection of CO2, whether this CO2 is in the gas or liquid form.
And while without any doubt a pure gas is preferred according to the invention, it is possible to envisage gas mixtures comprising at least 25% of CO2.
As will be seen in more detail in what follows, the present invention carries out a measurement of the incoming pH (i.e. taken well upstream of the injection, which allows time to react according to the result of the measurement), and then the dose of CO2 to be applied is calculated, in a predictive way.
It should be considered that the pH measurement is carried out sufficiently upstream of the injection very simply in order for the pH measurement point not be disrupted by the downstream injection.
Generally, a typical effluent exhibits a typical curve of dose of CO2 to be injected as a function of the pH of the effluent for a predetermined volume in litres or in cubic metres.
This curve is obtained either from calculations based on analyses of composition (commercial software is available for this or very simply by a conventional pH calculation in order to determine the CO2 requirement and thus the neutralization curve), or from tests carried out in the laboratory.
These tests consist of a conventional acid/base volumetric titration using a burette or a pH calculation following the rules of the art which makes it possible to determine the amount of acid to be injected.
For CO2, depending on the technical solution proposed, the real amount injected corresponds to the theoretical requirement (as evaluated above) divided by the transfer efficiency.
Thus, for an in-line injection, the efficiency is regarded as being between 90% and 95%. Thus, with the preceding titrimetric assaying, typically 10% is added.
The dose thus determined is multiplied by the effluent flow rate. This flow rate is either fixed and corresponds to the flow rate of the pump, or variable; it is then measured by a flowmeter placed immediately after the pump. The curve thus determined is supplied to the intelligence or the automaton/calculator, which will then manage the injection.
The improvement which the proposal according to the present invention constitutes is then understood without difficulty since in fact, for an in-line neutralization, by working on data available before the injection, it is much easier to guarantee good dosing of CO2 from the starting up of the discharge pump, this being the case whatever happens.
This is particularly true in the case of a rapid and frequent emptying of a pit or sink containing an effluent or water which is alkaline (pH greater than 7, for example). The liquid will be immediately treated with the right flow rate of CO2 from its entry towards the injector.
The pH measurement at the injector outlet (downstream of the injection) then becomes optional; it is then there only to provide information, so as to confirm the proper control and regulation of the injection of the CO2.
There then exists, by virtue of the invention, an “intrinsic” anticipation in the system as proposed, without artefact as in the conventional procedure (based on the downstream pH measurement, which requires an anticipation).
It can thus be said, in short, regarding the present invention, that:
Start-up is thus carried out here directly with a necessary flow rate of CO2, calculated “blindly” in a way.
Reference may be made to the following documents of the prior art in order to achieve a better understanding of this difference in approach:
It is thus the difference between the setpoint pH and the pH measured at the outlet which will direct a valve for regulation of the injection of CO2. The flow rate of CO2 is thus variable, and the target is to regulate the pH. Treatment of the first incoming millilitres of water is thus quite impossible (need for a latency time),
Reference may be made to
It is consequently not known if this document employs a fixed flow rate of orate
Lime is subsequently added, which leads this water to become “recharged” with inorganics/TAC. This is thus indeed a remineralization (the starting water is poor in inorganics since it is soft), Consequently this situation is also distant from the present invention, which is a neutralization and not a mineralization, since, in these remineralization processes, the pH is not important; it is indeed the composition of the water to be remineralized which is important and which conditions the requirement curve, and the like, which will thus be very different from that used according to the present neutralization invention.
For a further understanding of the nature and objects for the present invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like elements are given the same or analogous reference numbers and wherein:
The following elements are recognized in the figures:
The following implementational example should be considered: It is concerned with neutralizing an effluent which arrives in the entry pit 1, with a working volume of 2 m3.
The flow rate of incoming effluent is in the vicinity of 30 m3/h and the flow rate of the pump 2, which makes it possible to empty the entry pit, is in the vicinity of 80 h.
In short, when the pit contains 2 m3 of effluent, the pump is set going and empties the pit. At the flow rate of the pump, the emptying takes place in a little more than 2.5 minutes.
Due to the flow rate of effluent which arrives on the pit, this emptying sequence takes place approximately 15 times per hour.
The pipeline 7 at the pump outlet makes it possible to deliver the effluent at approximately 150 m from the entry pit into an open-air inspection hole of approximately 1 m3.
The pipeline is buried over virtually the whole of its course. It has a diameter of 120 mm in order to observe the optimum hydraulic conditions for mixing with a view to neutralizing the effluent. Due to its diameter and its length, the volume of effluent contained in this pipeline between the outlet of the pump and the outlet basin is of the order of 1.7 m3.
Over a “standard” neutralization, the acid injected, in this instance CO2, is regulated from the pH measurement located at the pipeline end (6), in this instance in the outlet basin. By definition, this basin is at a pH close to neutrality since it corresponds to the final discharged product. During start-up of the emptying pump, it is necessary for a more or less large part to arrive in this basin in order for the pH to increase and for the order for injection to be given to the regulator 4. Consequently, before the CO2 is injected into and mixed in the effluent, a large part of the volume of effluent from the pipeline will be poured into the outlet basin without being treated and thus into the natural environment or into the drainage system, due to the small size of the outlet basin.
In this example, as the volume contained in the pipeline is close to 1.7 m3, and the hourly frequency of start-up of the pump close to 15 times per hour, between ⅔ and ¾ of the effluent will not be correctly treated with a neutralization regulated in a standard manner in-line.
In order to overcome this problem, the injection of CO2 might be forestalled but then, as the injection is no longer directly proportional to the requirement, the risk exists of overacidification or of overconsumption.
Of course, it is also possible, in order to solve the problem, to produce a large-sized outlet basin, in order “to dampen” the frequent start-ups of the pump, but this cannot always be carried out due to problems of spatial requirements and/or of cost.
In
The same operating conditions should then be considered here as above, that is to say:
In accordance with the present invention, the method of regulation proposed operates in the following way:
With this method of regulation, all of the effluent contained in the pipeline is neutralized from the start-up of the emptying pump and the discharges are always in accordance without modification of the installation (no need to enlarge the outlet basin, for example).
The present invention then relates to a method for the treatment of an effluent, which comprises the injection, into the effluent, of CO2 or of a gas mixture comprising CO2, being characterized by the implementation of the following measures:
a) a measurement of the pH of the effluent is carried out upstream of the point of injection of the CO2 or of the mixture, in the process;
b) a curve of dose of CO2 to be injected as a function of the pH of a medium for a predetermined volume in litres or in cubic metres was determined beforehand, a curve determined, for example, by calculations or from experimental tests, and this curve is entered into a regulator or automaton capable of controlling the operation of the process;
c) the presence (the arrival) of a flow of effluent to be treated is detected, for example by setting a pump going or also by the detection of a flow using a flowmeter;
d) the value of the flow rate of effluent existing at the inlet of the process is available;
e) the dose of CO2 corresponding to the measured pH is read on said curve, and a calculation is made of the flow rate of CO2 to be injected as a function of the incoming water/effluent flow rate, the ratio of flow rates corresponding to said dose;
f) said flow rate of CO2 or of mixture is injected into the effluent;
g) the injected flow rate is regulated at the setpoint value determined in stage e).
The present invention also relates to an installation for the treatment of an effluent, carrying out the injection, into the effluent, of CO2 or of a mixture comprising CO2, comprising:
i) a means for measurement of the pH of the effluent, which means is located upstream of the point of injection of the CO2 or of the mixture in the installation;
ii) a means of detection of the arrival of a flow of effluent to be treated, for example a pump or also a flowmeter;
iii) a means for measurement of the flow rate of effluent to be treated existing at the inlet of the process;
iv) a regulator or automaton capable of controlling the treatment, as a function of its analysis of a curve of dose of CO2 to be injected as a function of the pH of a medium for a predetermined volume in litres or in cubic metres, a curve obtained, for example, by calculations or from experimental tests, the automaton being capable of carrying out the following actions:
While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims. The present invention may suitably comprise, consist or consist essentially of the elements disclosed and may be practiced in the absence of an element not disclosed. Furthermore, if there is language referring to order, such as first and second, it should be understood in an exemplary sense and not in a limiting sense. For example, it can be recognized by those skilled in the art that certain steps can be combined into a single step.
The singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
“Comprising” in a claim is an open transitional term which means the subsequently identified claim elements are a nonexclusive listing i.e. anything else may be additionally included and remain within the scope of “comprising.” “Comprising” is defined here n as necessarily encompassing the more limited transitional terms “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of”; “comprising” may therefore be replaced by “consisting essentially of” or “consisting of” and remain within the expressly defined scope of “comprising”.
“Providing” in a claim is defined to mean furnishing, supplying, making available, or preparing something. The step may be performed by any actor in the absence of express language in the claim to the contrary.
Optional or optionally means that the subsequently described event or circumstances may or may not occur. The description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not occur.
Ranges may be expressed herein as from about one particular value, and/or to about another particular value. When such a range is expressed, it is to be understood that another embodiment is from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value, along with all combinations within said range.
All references identified herein are each hereby incorporated by reference into this application in their entireties, as well as for the specific information for which each is cited.
It will be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangement of parts, which have been herein described in order to explain the nature of the invention, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the specific embodiments in the examples given above.
While embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching of this invention. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only and not limiting. Many variations and modifications of the composition and method are possible and within the scope of the invention. Accordingly the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described herein, but is only limited by the claims which follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011316 | Nov 2020 | FR | national |
