The present invention relates to a method of controlling front and/or rear spoilers.
DE 38 28 752 A1 describes an electronic spoiler adjustment controlled by driving parameters and which is used to always optimally stabilize a vehicle as a function of driving speed, turning, acceleration or braking. All the driving parameters that are important for an optimum setting angle of the spoilers are sent to a control and regulating unit where they are processed in realtime operation to yield an optimum setting angle of the spoiler.
An object of the present invention is to provide a method of controlling the spoiler setting which has an advantage over the known method whereby additionally providing a speed-activated spoiler control better adapts vehicle performance to the driving situation and driving requirements.
A feature whereby the applied engine power is detected and an average engine power is calculated therefrom prevents the system from responding to every minor change in engine power and thus the spoiler(s) is/are not being constantly deployed and retracted.
Another advantage of the present invention is obtained by specifying a threshold value for the average engine power, so that when this threshold value is exceeded, retraction of the spoiler is suppressed. This also avoids the frequent retraction and deployment of the rear spoiler, especially in circuit driving.
In addition, improved cooling and thus protection of components is possible if at the same time, a minimum cooling time is maintained, after which the spoiler can be retracted when the vehicle has been shut down or after the values fall below the stipulated threshold.
Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
If the average engine power value FPM is below the preselectable threshold value SW, the no-output leads to an AND link 22 in step 14. As another input variable for the AND link 23 in step 14, the standing time tSTAND determined for the vehicle is compared in unit 24 with a minimum cooling standing time tSTAND-cool in working step 15. This minimum cooling standing time tSTAND-cool can be obtained from an engine characteristics map 25 according to the temperature. If both signals are applied to the AND link 23 in step 14, i.e., the standing time is greater than the preselectable minimum standing time and the average power level is lower than a preselectable threshold level, then the output of the AND link 24 leads to working step 16 in which the retraction of the spoiler occurs.
The YES output of the query in step 13 leads to an OR step to which the NO output of the query in step 15 is also sent. Thus, if the average power level of the vehicle is above a preselectable threshold value or if the standing time tSTAND is lower than a minimum standing time tSTAND-cool which is required for cooling the vehicle, then output of the OR step 17 leads to the working step 18 and the retraction of the rear spoiler is suppressed.
For performing this method, it is necessary and advantageous to store the last values for the engine power PM and when starting the vehicle anew, to first check on whether the standing time tSTAND is below the minimum standing time tSTAND-cool for the cooling process. If this is the case, then the engine power values calculated most recently would also be included in the current power calculation. If the minimum standing time requirement has been met, then the vehicle is cooled accordingly and the calculation for the power determination and the averaging of the power value can be performed again from the beginning.
It is also contemplated for the last average power value before shutting down the engine with the signal “ignition off” to be stored in a buffer memory, which will retain the value until the next ignition reset and can overwrite this value in the next driving cycle.
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 08 758 | Feb 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4432512 | Young | Feb 1984 | A |
4659130 | Dimora et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4660879 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4810022 | Takagi et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4840263 | Kato et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4849891 | Krohn et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5024491 | Pease et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5170963 | Beck, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181740 | Horn | Jan 1993 | A |
5294170 | Hsueh | Mar 1994 | A |
5356195 | Kanda | Oct 1994 | A |
5378020 | Horn | Jan 1995 | A |
5789881 | Egami et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6098922 | Hahl | Aug 2000 | A |
6120009 | Gatehouse et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129306 | Pham | Oct 2000 | A |
6422507 | Lipeles | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431639 | Yoon | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6517026 | Smith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6666307 | Christensen | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6739634 | Pagan | May 2004 | B1 |
6786315 | Christensen | Sep 2004 | B1 |
20010052717 | Yoon | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020125738 | Pettey | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040071997 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040243291 | Seidel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
38 28 752 | Aug 1988 | DE |
3828752 | Mar 1990 | DE |
19932167 | Jan 2001 | DE |
10308758 | Sep 2004 | DE |
59-67062 | Apr 1984 | JP |
59-89899 | May 1984 | JP |
03136980 | Jun 1991 | JP |
2004262444 | Sep 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040243291 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |