This application claims the priority of German patent document 103 42 866.6, filed Sep. 15, 2003, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
The invention concerns a method for determining the position of a spacecraft based on two vector determinations, wherein sensor data and spin data are determined as output variables for determining the position.
In known stabilization systems, a spacecraft, outfitted with an earth sensor (for direction measurement) and spin wheels that generate a spin target value, can be stabilized around all 3 axes (Whecon principle). The methods employed by such systems make use of the dynamic coupling between rolling and yawing induced by the spin target value in order to stabilize the spacecraft either directly, by correspondingly selected actuator control (jets or wheels), or by using an observer to determine the missing position information (as a rule, the yaw position).
European patent document EP 0 786 132, for example, explains the Whecon principle, on the one hand, and a method for determining the position of a spacecraft as well, in which a decoupling of the individual factors that act upon the spacecraft takes place. Hence, decoupling terms are determined there in order to obtain a decoupling of the roll-yaw coupling terms. This nonetheless represents a relatively high computing expenditure.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,467A discloses a method and apparatus for determining the position of a spin-stabilized spacecraft in an inertial reference system. The following steps are carried out: the determination of a spin vector direction in the inertial reference system, based on measured data (in particular the sensor data); the determination of a spin vector in a body-fixed reference system, based on known inertial data; the determination of a direction vector based on single axis sensor data; the determination of a reference direction vector with the aid of an ephemeris model; and the determination of the position of the spacecraft based on the mentioned four vectors and the propagation of the position utilizing sensor data. This method cannot be applied for three axis stabilized spacecraft, and requires in addition a relatively large number of known input variables and sensor data.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a simplified and improved method for determining the position of a spacecraft, in particular a three axis stabilized spacecraft.
This and other objects and advantages are achieved by the method and apparatus for determining the position of a spacecraft according to the invention, based on the determination of direction vectors and spin vectors. Sensor data and spin data are determined as initial variables for determining position, and
This method is simpler than the known method according to the state of the art, since utilizing the knowledge of an initial value of the overall spin eliminates the necessity, on the one hand, for an expensive determination of decoupling terms; and, on the other hand, the individual detection steps for determining the position are simplified, as explained below. In particular, basically only one single single-axis vector measurement with the aid of a sensor is necessary, namely for the measurement of the direction vector in a body-fixed coordinate system.
The overall spin can be determined, for example, as a deviation with respect to a reference overall spin. The reference overall spin can be determined, on the one hand, by time propagation of known initial values of the overall spin. For this purpose a measurement or estimate of the overall spin at a specific initial point in time is also required. But the reference overall spin can also be determined by way of a time tracking of a reference model of an overall spin. This corresponds basically to the method of using an observer, which his known in principle from the state of the art. The reference direction vector can be determined basically also (similarly to the reference overall spin) either by time propagation of known initial values of the direction vector or through a time tracking of a reference model of the direction vector.
In one embodiment of the method according to the invention, first of all the rate of rotation or a component of the rate of rotation between a body-fixed coordinate system and the reference coordinate system is determined as an intermediate step of a position determination. In this manner the longitudinal rate component of the speed of rotation or the speed of rotation vector in the direction of the direction vector between the body-fixed coordinate system and the reference coordinate system is first determined based on at least the direction vector, the reference direction vector, and an overall spin that is time-propagated or time-tracked by means of a reference model. The overall spin can moreover be used in a suitable representation, for example, in an orbit coordinate system. With the aid of the longitudinal rate component, the overall spin vector is determined in the body-fixed coordinate system. A transformation matrix that describes the deviations of the actual position of the body-fixed coordinate system of the spacecraft from the target position of the body-fixed coordinate system is determined based on the direction vector, the reference direction vector, the overall spin vector, and the reference overall spin vector; that is, a transformation matrix of the deviations of the actual position of the body-fixed coordinate system of the spacecraft is determined by the reference coordinate system. The reference coordinate system thus represents the target position of the body-fixed coordinate system. The overall spin was utilized again for this method step, so that only the knowledge on the direction vector and on the overall spin is necessary for the overall position determination, which essentially simplifies the method. In addition, in the last method step, the overall spin according to direction and magnitude is not required. The direction of the overall spin alone suffices.
In addition, at least the direction vector and the reference direction vector in particular are used to determine the overall spin vector in the body-fixed coordinate system.
The overall spin is basically determined by whether the spacecraft has spin wheels whose wheel spin constitutes a basic component of the overall spin. The previously described method can be carried out in connection with a spacecraft with spin wheels, even without an explicit measurement of wheel spin. The speed of rotation or components of the speed of rotation can also be determined based on the estimated values or measured values of the wheel spin. Particularly the determination of the longitudinal rate component and the determination of the overall spin vector can occur in addition based on the determined spin vector of spin wheels of the spacecraft.
The method can be carried out in an especially advantageous manner if the deviations of the actual position from the target position are small. This applies in particular when the angle deviations {tilde over (φ)}-BR are smaller than 0.1 wheel in the transformation matrix TBR=1−{tilde over (φ)}-BR are less than 0.1 radius.
An arrangement for determining the position of a spacecraft has the following components:
The aforementioned arrangements can moreover consist of one or more functional components. Such an arrangement serves in particular to implement the method described above, and achieves advantages and possibilities already mentioned.
A further embodiment of the invention has, in addition: a device for determining the longitudinal rate component of the speed of rotation (or, the speed of rotation vector in the direction of the direction vector) between the body-fixed coordinate system and the reference coordinate system
Moreover, the invention may also include an apparatus for measuring or estimating the spin vector of spin wheels of the spacecraft.
Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The single FIGURE of the drawing illustrates a block diagram of the invention.
The following relationships are used for derivation of the method according to the invention:
wherein
wherein:
The speed of rotation component c is calculated first. Since the angle between the measured and reference vectors is independent from the coordinate system selected, the following applies:
eBThB=eRThR=e0Th0 (3)
wherein
hR=TR0h0
and wherein
Based on (3) follows directly the third line with (1) and (2)
Since the term J2(ωRI+{tilde over (e)}RėR) remains small with respect to hw due to the selection of the wheel spin, the term JS{tilde over (φ)} φBR (ωRI+{tilde over (e)}RėR) of second order is small, wherewith hw becomes practically independent of {tilde over (φ)}BR and consequently of TBR.
In addition to determining hB via c in accordance with equation (2), (4) offers alternatively the use of an observer or a Kalman filter that utilizes the vector hB reduced by the term with the unknown c as a measured variable. The equations for this read:
(aa)hm=Js(−{tilde over (e)}BėB+{tilde over (e)}RėR)+hs
(bb){circumflex over (ω)}BI=Js−1(z−hw)
(cc)ż+{circumflex over ({tilde over (ω)}BI·z=K(hm−z) (2a)
wherein
There exist therefore position and speed deviations with respect to the reference system wherewith the spacecraft can be oriented in a known manner by switching in these two components on the actuators in reference to the reference system.
To explain the practical procedure an earth-oriented spacecraft on a circular orbit is considered. The simple relationship applies for the orbit spin h0
ts(0): are outer moments for the spacecraft, expressed in the orbit system.
As already mentioned, two techniques may be used to determine h(0)t:
wherein
wherein:
One essential advantage of the method according to the invention is that, independently of target orientation with respect to the orbit system (for example, in so-called yaw steering), which is also time variable, all calculation steps remain unaltered, since only the matrix TRO is correspondingly selected. In the previously known method mentioned earlier, extensive calculations must be included for compensation terms or even a time-variable dynamic of the observer. Furthermore, various types of sensors (for example, earth sensors, magnetometers) can be used as sensors.
These advantages make it possible to use the method according to the invention in all classes of spacecraft (LEO, MEO, GEO).
The FIGURE is a block diagram of a representative embodiment for realization of the method described herein:
Based on a known path position of the spacecraft (for example, through time propagation of initial values for the position of the spacecraft, and a position change over time, ideally taking into consideration external disturbances, by tracking a path model or by internal or external measurements of the spacecraft position, such as GPS) determined with the aid of a path position device 11, the reference unit vector e0 is determined using a stored orbit model in a first orbit model device 1. The latter information is then fed to a device 2 for determining the longitudinal rate, in order to determine c in accordance with equation (4). The device 2 also receives transformed unit vectors eR (which is transformed into the reference system by a transformation device 3, using the known stored transformation matrix TRO), as well as its time derivative obtained via the differentiator 4. The unit vector eR is furthermore fed into the module 5 for the spin determination and the module 6 for the position determination.
The unity vector eB is determined with the aid of a sensor 9 (for example, an earth sensor or magnetometer) and fed to the modules for longitudinal rate determination 2, spin determination 5, as well as for the position determination 6. Furthermore, the time derivative of eB obtained via a differentiator 7 is fed to the two initially mentioned modules 5,6.
The spin vector hw for the spin wheels (not shown) is obtained from measurement signals of a measuring device 10, and is fed into the modules for longitudinal rate determination 2 and spin determination 5. The longitudinal rate c determined in module 2 is fed to the module for spin determination 5, whose result hB, is then fed to the module for the position determination 6, and to a reference model module 8 for the orbital spin. Moreover, estimated values {circumflex over (t)} of external disturbance moments are fed to the reference model module 8.
The result vector of the reference model module 8, ĥ0, is fed back to the longitudinal rate determination module 2, and transformed into the reference system (not shown) through the module 3, and the result (the overall spin vector hR in the reference coordinates system) is fed to the module 6 for position determination. The latter module finally determines in accordance with the above-mentioned method the transformation matrix TBR describing the satellite position based on the two vector pairs eB, eR, hB, hR fed thereto. This transformation matrix describes the transformation between the body-fixed coordinate system and the reference coordinate system. This transformation matrix likewise describes the deviation of the overall spin from the reference overall spin.
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 42 866 | Sep 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3866025 | Cavanagh | Feb 1975 | A |
4358076 | Lange et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4504912 | Bruderle et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4725024 | Vorlicek | Feb 1988 | A |
4752884 | Slafer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4757964 | McIntyre | Jul 1988 | A |
5020744 | Schwarzschild | Jun 1991 | A |
5042752 | Surauer et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5058835 | Goodzeit et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5080307 | Smay et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5222023 | Liu et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5255879 | Yocum et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5279483 | Blancke et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5433402 | Surauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5452869 | Basuthakur et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5826828 | Fowell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5931421 | Surauer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5996941 | Surauer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6000661 | Price et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6019320 | Shah et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6282467 | Shah et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311932 | Rodden et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347262 | Smay et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6577929 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
20020121573 | Vandenbussche et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
693 09 015 | Jul 1997 | DE |
696 06 275 | Jul 2000 | DE |
0 603 058 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 785 132 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 790 542 | Jan 2000 | EP |
2 360 099 | Sep 2001 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050090948 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |