Patent Grant
8244416
This application claims priority to French Patent Application 0903265, filed Jul. 3, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a process for evaluating an error in the positioning of an aircraft generated by a positioning system on-board the aircraft, and a device for implementing such a process.
This invention more particularly applies, although not exclusively, to a satellite positioning system, such as the GPS positioning system (‘Global Positioning System’).
It is known that the GPS positioning system enables to supply relatively reliable and accurate information on the aircraft positioning.
However, studies showed that using the GPS positioning system by the pilot as a sole source of positioning for the aircraft could result in incidents and sometimes in accidents for the aircraft.
It is found, indeed, that the accuracy of the calculation as implemented in the GPS positioning system and generating the aircraft positioning could be reduced temporarily upon aircraft navigation in flight and that this accuracy defect could result in the pilot taking the wrong decisions because of the erroneous indication of the positioning.
A bad transmission of the signals sent by satellites and/or a bad reception of such signals by the aircraft disrupt(s) or disturb(s) the continuity of the calculation as implemented in the GPS positioning system, likely to result in such an accuracy defect.
A number of situations is known wherein the transmission and/or the reception of signals between the satellites and the aircraft are damaged, in particular:
unfavourable weather conditions, for instance, a high cloud cover, a storm or a strong humidity;
a radioelectric interference;
an obstacle interposed between the aircraft and the satellites.
Furthermore, other events could reduce the accuracy in the calculation of the GPS positioning system, such as an incident on a satellite or a temporary alignment of satellites resulting in a temporary geometrical uncertainty.
Thus, it would be advantageous to be able to evaluate the error on the positioning generated by the GPS positioning system, in order to allow for the pilot to know whether the aircraft positioning reported by such a GPS positioning system has a high accuracy level and this, on a permanent basis.
The present invention aims at meeting such requirements and provides a process for evaluating an error in the aircraft positioning generated by an on-board positioning system.
To this end, the process according to this invention is remarkable in that, automatically:
the aircraft positioning generated by the positioning system is recorded;
radar means detect the presence of at least one group of targets arranged on the ground and, through said radar means, the position thereof is measured, with respect to the aircraft positioning; and
the error of the aircraft positioning is evaluated, comparing, with at least one threshold value, the value of at least one reference magnitude being characteristic of the difference existing between the measured position and a known position of the group of targets with respect to the aircraft positioning.
Thus, the process according to this invention enables to evaluate, in an accurate way, an error of the aircraft positioning generated by the positioning system. Such an evaluation allows the pilots to take the appropriate decisions being adapted for the thus evaluated accuracy level.
Advantageously, when said reference magnitude is lower than or equal to the threshold value, the aircraft positioning is used as generated by the positioning system at least for the aircraft navigation or for implementing any other function requiring an accurate position. When said reference magnitude exceeds said threshold value, the aircraft positioning being generated by the positioning system is corrected, taking into account said error of the positioning and the new positioning is used.
In a preferred embodiment:
on a screen of the aircraft, the measured position of the group of targets is displayed with respect to the aircraft positioning;
on the screen the known position of the group of targets is displayed with respect to the aircraft positioning; and
the error of the aircraft positioning being generated by the positioning system is evaluated comparing on the screen the measured position and the known position of the group of targets.
Advantageously, several groups of targets are detected and one group of targets is selected amongst the thus detected groups of targets. Such a selection could automatically or manually occur.
For detecting the presence of the group of targets, vectors are determined with respect to the aircraft from intensity maxima of return signals, received and measured by radar means, and it is checked whether the geometrical shape implemented by such vectors corresponds to the particular geometrical shape of said group of targets.
Preferably, evaluating the positioning error automatically occurs when the aircraft is located in a detection area for the group of targets.
Still advantageously, the group of targets is arranged according to a particular geometrical shape being adapted for detection by the radar means.
The present invention further relates to a device for evaluating an error in the aircraft positioning generated by an on-board positioning system.
The device according to this invention is remarkable in that it comprises:
said positioning system;
radar means for detecting the presence of at least one group of targets arranged on the ground and for measuring the position thereof with respect to the aircraft positioning; and
calculation means for evaluating the error in the aircraft positioning, such calculation means being coupled to the positioning system and to the radar means determining and comparing, with at least one threshold value, the value of at least one reference magnitude being characteristic of the difference existing between the measured position and the known position of the group of targets with respect to the aircraft positioning.
Advantageously said device further comprises means for correcting the aircraft positioning taking into account the evaluation of the error of positioning and means for signaling to the pilot the error in the aircraft positioning.
The present invention also relates to an aircraft provided with such a device.
The figures of the appended drawing will better explain how this invention can be implemented. In these figures, like reference numerals relate to like components
a, 3b and 3c schematically show three consecutive images of the screen on
Referring to
The radar means 2 detect the presence of at least one group of targets arranged on the ground and measure the position thereof with respect to the aircraft positioning, generated by the positioning system 3 being a satellite positioning system, such as the GPS positioning system. The signaling means 4 enable to warn the pilot of an error in the positioning and to indicate a new corrected positioning.
The electronic control unit 1A comprises calculation means 5, correction means 6 and storing means 7. The calculation means 5 have as a function to evaluate the error in the aircraft positioning and they are coupled to the positioning system 3 and to the radar means 2.
The operation of the device 1 is described below.
In a first step, the electronic control unit 1A receives at the input the electrical signals sent by the radar means 2 and transmitted via a link 8. Such signals indicate the detection and position of a group of targets. It also receives at the input the electrical signals sent by the positioning system 3 and transmitted via a link 9. Such signals indicate the aircraft positioning generated by the positioning system 3.
In a second step, it processes these electrical signals received via the calculation means 5, and evaluates the possible positioning error generated by the positioning system 3.
In a third step, the electronic control unit 1A sends at the outlet to the signaling means 4 the electrical signals transmitted via a link 10. These electrical signals indicate the possible positioning error and the new corrected positioning.
As illustrated on
through the electronic control unit 1A, the positioning 13 of the aircraft generated by the positioning system 3 is recorded, on a screen 12, being for example part of the signaling means 4, the so-called known position 14 on the ground of the group of targets is displayed, that it available with respect to the aircraft positioning 13. Such a known position 14 representing the true position of said group on the ground has been preliminarily recorded in the storing means 7;
through the radar means 2, the presence on the ground of the group of targets is detected, then through such radar means 2, the position 15 of the group of targets is measured, with respect to the positioning 13 of the aircraft, and such a position 15 is displayed on the screen 12; and
an error 16 in the aircraft positioning 13 is evaluated, comparing on the screen 12 the measured position 15 and the known position 14 of the group of targets.
For evaluating with accuracy such an error 16 regarding the positioning 13, the calculation means 5 determine in a first step, the value of a reference magnitude being characteristic of the difference existing between the measured position 15 and the known position 14 of the group of targets with respect to the positioning 13. In a second step, the calculation means 5 compare the value of the reference magnitude with a threshold value.
In a first alternative embodiment of the process, the reference magnitude is the distance between the barycentre of the measured positions of the targets (of said group of targets) and the barycentre of the known positions of said targets with respect to the positioning 13.
In a second alternative embodiment of the process, said reference magnitude corresponds to the average of the individual distances between the measured positions and the known positions of the targets with respect to the positioning 13.
When said reference magnitude exceeds said threshold value, the correction means 6 correct the aircraft positioning 13 generated by the positioning system 3 taking into account said positioning error 16, and the new corrected position is displayed by the signaling means 4.
The reference magnitude could be another variable than those previously mentioned, the essential being that the value thereof enables to evaluate, with respect to a predetermined threshold value, the possible error 16 in the positioning 13 generated by the positioning system 3. It is also possible to define a first threshold value beyond which it is considered that there is no error 16 regarding the positioning 13 and that the EPU (Estimated Position Uncertainty) index is good, and a second threshold value higher than the first threshold value beyond which it is considered that there is an error 16 regarding the positioning 13 and that the EPU index is wrong. Between the two threshold values, it is considered that the value of the aircraft positioning 13 has some uncertainty and that the EPU index is an average. The signaling means 4 could also be sound.
a to 3c illustrate a selecting step for the group of targets, according to the process implemented by the device 1.
On
On
On
Alternatively, selecting could be performed automatically by the device 1. Thus, the electronic control unit 1A could be activated automatically when the aircraft is located in a detection area for one of said groups 17 and 18 of targets. The detection area of a group 17, 18 of targets could be a circle centred on the barycentre of targets of this group 17 and 18 of targets and comprising a radius defining an area wherein the probability to detect the group of targets is, for example, 95%.
Advantageously, the radar means 2 perform two scans, which allows, when the group 17 of targets is not detected and that it should be detected considering the positioning 13, to confirm that the positioning 13 is wrong and that the group 17 of targets is not in the detection area.
The groups of targets are arranged on the ground according to a particular geometrical shape adapted for radar detection.
In a preferred embodiment, being illustrated on
The targets arranged on the ground must have a high reflectivity. For instance, a target comprises an equivalent radar surface (RCS) of 10,000 m2 for being detected by the radar means 2 at a detection distance of 40 nautical miles (NM) with a detection probability of 95%. The location and the geometrical configuration of the targets make it possible to distinguish them from other ground elements. In one embodiment, these are radar reflectors having the shape of metallic balls or tetrahedron assemblies, allowing the signals emitted by the radar means 2 to be sent back homogeneously in all directions. In an alternative embodiment, they are elements projecting from the ground, such as buildings, plants, electric lines, providing for a satisfactory reflection of the signals emitted by the radar means 2.
Advantageously, the groups of targets are arranged in locations where the accurate aircraft positioning is to be known, for instance in the vicinity of airports, below busy air traffic lanes or in locations where the positioning systems have the lowest performance. The groups of targets could also be arranged along coasts so as to check the aircraft navigation after ocean crossings.
For detecting the presence of the group of targets, the calculation means 5 determine vectors with respect to the aircraft from the measured intensity maxima 23, 24 and 25 of the return signals issued from signals sent by the radar means 2 and reflected by the targets, as illustrated on
Thus, the device 1 according to this invention enables to perform, in a permanent and accurate way, an evaluation of the error 16 in the aircraft positioning 13 generated by the positioning system 3, and to correct it, if applicable, as a function of the position measured by the radar means 2. Said device 1 does not require adding new detection facilities, as it uses the on-board existing systems such as the radar means and the positioning system while coupling them.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09 03265 | Jul 2009 | FR | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3988734 | Elwood | Oct 1976 | A |
| 6512976 | Sabatino et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 20040015274 | Wilkins et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1860456 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110004402 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
