The present disclosure relates a process for reducing the size of a particle, and particularly to a process for grinding a particle. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a process for grinding a plastic material.
In accordance with the present disclosure, a process includes grinding a plastic material to reduce a particle size of the plastic material. The process may include a first grinding step in which the plastic material is reduced to a first particle size and a second grinding step in which the plastic material is reduced to a second particle size less than the first particle size. The first grinding step may be performed in a first mill. The second grinding step may be performed in a second mill.
In illustrative embodiments, the process may further include a step of freezing the plastic material. The step of freezing may occur before or during the first grinding step. The freezing step may be performed by adding plastic material to liquid nitrogen at a temperature of lower than about −250° F. to form frozen plastic material.
In illustrative embodiments, the frozen plastic material may have a particle size of about 300 μm and above and a temperature lower than about −250° F. prior to the first grinding step. After the first grinding step, the plastic material may have a particle size between about 275 μm to about 150 μm and a temperature of at least −100° F. or less. After the second grinding step, the plastic material may have a particle size of about 100 μm or less. Subjecting the plastic material to low temperatures may increase a brittleness and/or a fracturability of the plastic material so that a throughput rate of the process is increased.
Additional features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of illustrative embodiments exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the disclosure as presently perceived.
The detailed description particularly refers to the accompanying FIGURES in which:
A process 100 for grinding materials is shown in the
In illustrative embodiments, plastic material 10 comprises plastic particles that are, for example, in pellet or flake form. Illustratively, plastic material 10 may be a strand, a pellet, or a flake. The plastic particles of plastic material 10 may have a particle size of greater than about 300 μm or greater than about 350 μm. In some embodiments, plastic material 10 comprises particles having a size of about 300 μm to about 350 μm. In some embodiments, plastic material 10 is a ¼″ pellet or flake. In some embodiments, plastic material 10 includes 1 inch strands. In some embodiments, plastic material 10 is about 200 μm to about 2.5 cm. In some embodiments, plastic material 10 is about 300 μm to about 2.5 cm.
Process 100 may be applied to a variety of plastic materials 10, for example, engineering plastics. In some embodiments, plastic material 10 comprises engineering plastics such as polycarbonate, polylactic acid, polyethylimide, polyethylene, nylon, polycaprolactam, polytetrafluoroethylene, any other suitable material, or a mixture thereof.
Process 100 reduces the particle size of plastic material 10, as shown in
In illustrative embodiments, process 100 includes a step of freezing 110 plastic material 10, as shown in
Process 100 includes a first grinding stage 120 that reduces the particle size of the frozen plastic material 10, as shown in
Grinding stage 120 reduces the particle size of plastic material 10 to form first-stage plastic material 12 as shown in
Process 100 includes a second grinding stage 130 as shown in
In illustrative embodiments, grinding stage 130 is performed in a mill that reduces the particle size of plastic material 12 to second-stage plastic material 14 having particle size of less than 100 μm, as shown in
As described herein, process 100 can have a higher throughput than a comparable process lacking freezing step 110, a refreezing step, or both. In illustrative embodiments, process 100 can be performed as a continuous process. In the continuous process, first-stage plastic material 12 is not isolated prior to grinding stage 130. Illustratively, the continuous process may have a throughput rate of plastic material 10 to second-stage plastic material 14 of at least 50 lbs/hour or at least 70 lbs/hour.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/992,430, filed Mar. 20, 2020, which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3633830 | Oberpriller | Jan 1972 | A |
4025990 | Lovette, Jr. | May 1977 | A |
4102503 | Meinass | Jul 1978 | A |
4863106 | Perkel | Sep 1989 | A |
20070034722 | Waznys | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20100224712 | Donckers, II | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20190023856 | Yoshida | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103223369 | Jul 2013 | CN |
0317935 | May 1989 | EP |
0968080 | Jun 2002 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Spencer Ind Inc, Thermoplastics defined (Oct. 17, 2023) (https://www.spencerindustries.com/the-basics-of-thermoplastic-production/#:˜text=Thermoplastics%20can%20come%20from%20both,%2D%20and%20plant%2Dbased%20materials.) Site accessed Oct. 17, 2023 (Year: 2023). |
Wilczek et al., “Optimized Technologies for Cryogenic Grinding”, Int. J. of Miner. Process., vol. 74S, Dec. 10, 2004, pp. S425-S434, 10 pages. |
Liang et al., “Production of Fine Polymer Powder under Cryogenic Conditions” Chem. Eng. Technol. 25, 2002, pp. 401-405, 5 pages. |
Bruyère et al., “Cryogenic Ball Milling: A Key for Elemental Analysis of Plastic-Rich Automotive Shedder Residue” Powder Technology, vol. 294, Jun. 2016, pp. 454-462, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210291406 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62992430 | Mar 2020 | US |