1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to materials processing involving a chemical and/or a physical action(s) or reaction(s) of a component or between components. More specifically, the present invention produces a gas-in-liquid emulsion in a reactor to continuously process relatively large quantities of materials.
2. General Background and State of the Art
Apparatus for materials processing consisting of coaxial cylinders that are rotated relative to one another about a common axis, the materials to be processed being fed into the annular space between the cylinders, are known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,999, issued 6 Dec. 1994 to Colorado State University Research Foundation discloses processes for the high shear processing of a fibrous biomass by injecting a slurry thereof into a turbulent Couette flow created in a “high-frequency rotor-stator device”, this device having an annular chamber containing a fixed stator equipped with a coaxial toothed ring cooperating with an opposed coaxial toothed ring coupled to the rotor. U.S. Pat. No. 5,430,891, issued 23 Aug. 1994 to Nippon Paint Co., Ltd. discloses processes for continuous emulsion polymerization in which a solution containing the polymerizable material is fed to the annular space between coaxial relatively rotatable cylinders.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,279,463, issued 18 Jan., 1994, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,191, issued 23 Jul. 1996, both having the same applicant as the present invention, disclose methods and apparatus for high-shear material treatment, one type of the apparatus consisting of a rotor rotating within a stator to provide an annular flow passage. U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,191, in particular, at column 13, line 37, describes using the invention as a gas/liquid chemical reactor by enveloping the greater part of the liquid that clings to the periphery of the spinning rotor with a body of the reactant gas. The high peripheral velocity of the wetted, spinning rotor causes the gas to be in a highly turbulent state of surface renewal at its contact interface with the liquid film. However, this gas/liquid reaction method provides a relatively small gas/liquid contact area and is prone to considerable back-mixing (mixing in the longitudinal, axial or general flow direction) of the gas component thus providing an undesirably large residence time distribution (RTD), impairing the overall efficiency of the process.
Sparging gasses through liquids for reacting the gasses with the liquids is also known in the prior art, but also fails to provide adequate interfacial contact area between the liquid and gas.
It would be desirable to provide a large interfacial contact area between a liquid and a gas in an efficient continuous or batch type process.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for producing a gas-in-liquid emulsion for providing increased interfacial contact area between the liquid and the gas for improved reaction of the gas with the liquid, or more rapid solution or reaction of a difficulty soluble or immiscible gas in or with a liquid. This invention provides a superior, more economical and more efficient way of contacting gases with liquids for the purpose of effecting reactions between them to be carried out as a continuous or batch type process.
A reactor 8 is illustrated by
Turning to
The reactor comprises a baseplate 22 on which is mounted rotor bearing supports 24, stator supports 26 and a variable speed electric drive motor 28. The cylindrical member 30, comprising the apparatus stator, is mounted on the supports 24. A rotor shaft 40 extends between the supports 24 and is supported thereby, one end of the shaft being connected to the motor 28. The shaft 40 carries the cylindrical member 42, comprising the apparatus rotor. The processing chamber 44 is formed between the inner cylindrical surface 46 of the cylindrical member 30 and the outer cylindrical surface 48 of rotor 42 and face body 51. The ends of the chamber are closed against leakage by end seals 50 that surround the shaft 40.
In the embodiment of
In another embodiment, as illustrated in
Rather than the horizontal orientation of
U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/214,538 entitled “Process for High Shear Gas-Liquid Reactions” to Holl filed on Jun. 27, 2000, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure, describes the use of the reactor 8 for gas/liquid reaction. The reactor emulsifies the gas into the liquid providing increased contact between the liquid and gas for more efficient reactions. The inventor of the present invention discovered that a gas-in-liquid emulsification can be created by narrowing the radial dimension between the surfaces 46, 48 of the processing chamber 44 while rapidly rotating the rotor cylindrical member 42 relative to the stator cylindrical member 30.
For the gas-in-liquid emulsification to occur, the radial dimension between the surfaces 46, 48 of the processing chamber 44 should be approximately equal to or less than the combined thickness of the two laminar boundary layers back-to-back. As the material being processed flows in the processing chamber 44 a respective boundary layer forms on each of the surfaces 46 and 48, the thickness of which is determined by the viscosity and other factors of the material being processed and the relative flow velocity of the material over the surface. The laminar boundary layer for a fluid flowing over a flat surface along a path length x, which in the invention is taken as one circumferential flow length around the rotor surface, may be determined by the equation:
where NRX is the product of length x and the flow velocity divided by the kinematic viscosity.
In addition to having a radial dimension requirement, the peripheral speed of the rotor cylindrical member 42 relative to the stator cylindrical member 30 should exceed approximately four meters per second for the gas-in-liquid emulsification to occur. The upper limit on the peripheral speed is determined by the application. For example, too great a speed might destroy living microbes or long molecular chains. Also, too great a speed can subject the reactor 8 to unnecessary stress and strain.
The required radial dimension and peripheral speed can vary depending on conditions. The radial dimension requirement and peripheral speed required for the onset of the emulsification phenomenon can be determined experimentally for given reactants under specified conditions. The onset of this emulsification phenomenon is indicated by the appearance of a white colored turbidity of the fluid agitated in the processing chamber 44. The stator cylindrical member 48 can, for observation purposes, be made of glass. The grayish-white to white, almost milk like turbidity
supply energy into the processing chamber 44 through a port 58 and window 60 as illustrated in
Also, the cooperating surfaces 46 and 48 in
Importantly, the reactor 8 can be quickly and thoroughly cleaned. Therefore, unlike the prior art, deposits forming and blocking the irradiation is not a problem. For example, even if the reactant is a sticky opaque substance, the surfaces 46, 48 and window 60 are easily cleaned. By running the reactor 8 with clean water for enough time for the water to pass from the inlet 14 to the outlet 52, substances clinging to the surfaces 46, 48 and the window 60 are washed away. In most cases the surfaces of the processing chamber 44 are clean within five seconds. This efficient cleaning ability is due to the extremely hard sheer forces as the rotor cylindrical member 42 and stator cylindrical member 30 rotate relative to each other. In most cases, no contaminants will even form on the window 60 or surfaces 46, 48 of the processing chamber 44 due to the hard sheer forces pulling the materials through the reactor 8.
The gas/liquid reaction can be used in an oxygenation process, or an enzyme reaction process for example: Additionally, solids, such as catalytic powders, can be added to the processing chamber 44 to form a gas/liquid/solid emulsion to provide a gas/liquid/solid reaction which can also be enhanced by the applied electromagnetic or longitudinal pressure energy as described below.
Returning to
The apparatus of the invention is generically a reactor process and apparatus, and a reactor consists of the vessels used to produce desired products by physical or chemical means, and is frequently the heart of a commercial processing plant. Its configurations, operating characteristics, and underlying engineering principles constitute reactor technology. Besides stoichiometry and kinetics, reactor technology includes requirements for introducing and removing reactants and products, supplying and withdrawing heat, accommodating phase changes and material transfers, assuring efficient contacting among reactants, and providing for catalyst replenishment or regeneration. These issues are taken into account when one translates reaction kinetics and bench-scale data into the design and manufacture of effective pilot plants, and thereafter scale up such plants to larger sized units, and ultimately designs and operates commercial plants.
While the specification describes particular embodiments of the present invention, those of ordinary skill can devise variations of the present invention without departing from the inventive concept.
This application is a divisional of and claims the benefit of all prior filing dates claimed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/894,996, filed Jun. 27, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,742,774, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. application Ser. No. 09/894,996 claims the benefit of the prior filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/214,538, filed Jun. 27, 2000, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. application Ser. No. 09/894,996 is also a continuation-in-part and claims priority of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/345,813, filed Jul. 2, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,082; of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/802,037, filed Mar. 7, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,471,392; and of U.S. application No. 09/853,448, filed May 10, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,999. This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/894,996, filed Jun. 27, 2001, which claims the benefit of the prior filing date of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/214,538, filed Jun. 27, 2000, herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
591494 | Pond | Oct 1897 | A |
2261257 | Kiesskalt et al. | Nov 1941 | A |
2295740 | Keen | Sep 1942 | A |
2314598 | Phelan | Mar 1943 | A |
2474006 | Maycock | Jun 1949 | A |
2577247 | Irwin | Dec 1951 | A |
3095349 | Rich | Jun 1963 | A |
3215642 | Levy | Nov 1965 | A |
3595531 | Williams et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3841814 | Eckhardt | Oct 1974 | A |
3870082 | Holl | Mar 1975 | A |
4000993 | Holl | Jan 1977 | A |
4057331 | Ong et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4071225 | Holl | Jan 1978 | A |
4073567 | Lakerveld et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4174907 | Suh et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4198383 | Konsetov et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4251576 | Osborn et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4287075 | Fujiwara et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4306165 | Kitabayashi et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4311570 | Cowen et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4315172 | Intichar et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4335180 | Traut | Jun 1982 | A |
4405491 | Sando et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4556467 | Kuhn et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4593754 | Holl | Jun 1986 | A |
4670103 | Holl | Jun 1987 | A |
4708198 | Holl | Nov 1987 | A |
4744521 | Singer et al. | May 1988 | A |
4769131 | Noll et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4778631 | Cobbs et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784218 | Holl | Nov 1988 | A |
4889909 | Besecke et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4921473 | Lee et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930708 | Chen | Jun 1990 | A |
4983307 | Nesathurai | Jan 1991 | A |
5154973 | Imagawa et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5198137 | Rutz et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204416 | Mercer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5212278 | Pfandner | May 1993 | A |
5227637 | Herold et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5268140 | Rutz et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5279463 | Holl | Jan 1994 | A |
5300019 | Bischof et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5335992 | Holl | Aug 1994 | A |
5358775 | Horn, III | Oct 1994 | A |
5370824 | Nagano et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370999 | Stuart | Dec 1994 | A |
5391603 | Wessel et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5395914 | Wilharm et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5449652 | Swartz et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471037 | Goethel et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5484647 | Nakatani et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506049 | Swei et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523169 | Rafferty et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5538191 | Holl | Jul 1996 | A |
5552210 | Horn, III et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554323 | Tsukimi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558820 | Nagano et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5576386 | Kempter et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5658485 | Cava et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658994 | Burgoyne, Jr. et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659006 | White | Aug 1997 | A |
5674004 | Takeuchi | Oct 1997 | A |
5693742 | White et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5739193 | Walpita et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754936 | Jansson | May 1998 | A |
5855865 | Lambert et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5874516 | Burgoyne, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5929138 | Mercer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5974867 | Forster et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998533 | Weber et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6039784 | Luk | Mar 2000 | A |
6040935 | Michalicek | Mar 2000 | A |
6074472 | Jachow et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093636 | Carter et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6134950 | Forster et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143052 | Kiyokawa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6176991 | Nordman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190034 | Nielsen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6281433 | Decker et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6391082 | Holl | May 2002 | B1 |
6464936 | Mowat et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471392 | Holl et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6742774 | Holl | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752529 | Holl | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20010030295 | Holl | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020038582 | Holl | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078793 | Holl | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089074 | Holl | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020148640 | Holl | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030043690 | Holl | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066624 | Holl | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
299 02 348 | Apr 1999 | DE |
299 19 570 | Jan 2000 | DE |
0 219 357 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0 660 336 | Jun 1995 | EP |
891 152 | Mar 1962 | GB |
1 232 644 | May 1971 | GB |
1 252 192 | Nov 1971 | GB |
2 192 558 | Jan 1988 | GB |
58 144549 | Aug 1983 | JP |
3 279991 | Dec 1991 | JP |
11322920 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-213876 | Aug 2000 | JP |
369 939 | Apr 1973 | SU |
957 991 | Sep 1982 | SU |
1 737 241 | May 1992 | SU |
WO 97 12665 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 97 42639 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 98 49675 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 02 071451 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03 022415 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040222536 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60214538 | Jun 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09894996 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 10857305 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09853448 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 09894996 | US | |
Parent | 09802037 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 09853448 | US | |
Parent | 09345813 | Jul 1999 | US |
Child | 09802037 | US |