Process for high shear gas-liquid reactions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6994330
  • Patent Number
    6,994,330
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 28, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 7, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
A reactor produces a gas-in-liquid emulsion for providing increased interfacial contact area between the liquid and the gas for improved reaction of the gas with the liquid, or more rapid solution or reaction of a difficulty to dissolve or immiscible gas in or with a liquid. The reactor is suitable for a continuous or batch type process. Rotor and stator cylindrical members are mounted for relative rotation one to the other and have opposing surfaces spaced to form an annular processing passage. The gap distance between the opposing surfaces and the relative rotation rate of the cylindrical members are such as to cause formation of a gas-in-liquid emulsion of the gas in the liquid, as the liquid and gas pass through the processing passage.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to materials processing involving a chemical and/or a physical action(s) or reaction(s) of a component or between components. More specifically, the present invention produces a gas-in-liquid emulsion in a reactor to continuously process relatively large quantities of materials.


2. General Background and State of the Art


Apparatus for materials processing consisting of coaxial cylinders that are rotated relative to one another about a common axis, the materials to be processed being fed into the annular space between the cylinders, are known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,999, issued 6 Dec. 1994 to Colorado State University Research Foundation discloses processes for the high shear processing of a fibrous biomass by injecting a slurry thereof into a turbulent Couette flow created in a “high-frequency rotor-stator device”, this device having an annular chamber containing a fixed stator equipped with a coaxial toothed ring cooperating with an opposed coaxial toothed ring coupled to the rotor. U.S. Pat. No. 5,430,891, issued 23 Aug. 1994 to Nippon Paint Co., Ltd. discloses processes for continuous emulsion polymerization in which a solution containing the polymerizable material is fed to the annular space between coaxial relatively rotatable cylinders.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,279,463, issued 18 Jan., 1994, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,191, issued 23 Jul. 1996, both having the same applicant as the present invention, disclose methods and apparatus for high-shear material treatment, one type of the apparatus consisting of a rotor rotating within a stator to provide an annular flow passage. U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,191, in particular, at column 13, line 37, describes using the invention as a gas/liquid chemical reactor by enveloping the greater part of the liquid that clings to the periphery of the spinning rotor with a body of the reactant gas. The high peripheral velocity of the wetted, spinning rotor causes the gas to be in a highly turbulent state of surface renewal at its contact interface with the liquid film. However, this gas/liquid reaction method provides a relatively small gas/liquid contact area and is prone to considerable back-mixing (mixing in the longitudinal, axial or general flow direction) of the gas component thus providing an undesirably large residence time distribution (RTD), impairing the overall efficiency of the process.


Sparging gasses through liquids for reacting the gasses with the liquids is also known in the prior art, but also fails to provide adequate interfacial contact area between the liquid and gas.


It would be desirable to provide a large interfacial contact area between a liquid and a gas in an efficient continuous or batch type process.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for producing a gas-in-liquid emulsion for providing increased interfacial contact area between the liquid and the gas for improved reaction of the gas with the liquid, or more rapid solution or reaction of a difficulty soluble or immiscible gas in or with a liquid. This invention provides a superior, more economical and more efficient way of contacting gases with liquids for the purpose of effecting reactions between them to be carried out as a continuous or batch type process.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a part elevation, part longitudinal cross sectional view of a complete reactor of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a transverse cross-sectional view of a reactor showing the cylindrical members in a concentric configuration with gas and liquid inlets leading to the processing chamber;



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of an eccentrically mounted embodiment of the reactor in which the longitudinal axes of the cylindrical members are displaced to give an annular passage that varies in radial width around its circumference, the reactor including a series of gas inlets along its length;



FIG. 4 is a cross sectional view of an eccentrically mounted embodiment of the reactor similar to FIG. 3, but showing a gas inlet at the top of the reactor and fluid inlets along the bottom of the reactor; and



FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic representation of the gas-in-liquid emulsion further illustrating incident white light and light scattered by the gas bubbles.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A reactor 8 is illustrated by FIGS. 1–4, and described in greater detail in U.S. patent Ser. No. 09/802,037 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Materials Processing”, filed Mar. 7, 2001 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,191 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for High-Shear Material Treatment” both by the applicant of the present invention and both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety into the present disclosure. An annular cross section processing chamber 44 having an annular gap is formed between an outer cylindrical member or cylindrical tube 30 comprising a stator and a cylindrical rotor or inner cylindrical member 42. Liquid and gas enter the processing chamber 44 through inlets 14. The cylindrical members 30, 42 rotate relative to each other producing a shear force on the liquid, gas and any other reactants as they are pumped through the processing chamber and out an outlet 52 at the downstream end of the processing chamber 44.


Turning to FIGS. 1 and 2 in particular, reactants are fed from supply tanks 10, 16, 20, respectively. Also shown are metering pumps 12 and 18 leading from the supply tanks 10, 16 and into the inlet 14. The reactants can be aqueous solutions and a gas such as carbon dioxide. The reaction can occur at room temperature and atmospheric pressure for example, although other temperatures and pressures can be chosen as appropriate.


The reactor comprises a baseplate 22 on which is mounted rotor bearing supports 24, stator supports 26 and a variable speed electric drive motor 28. The cylindrical member 30, comprising the apparatus stator, is mounted on the supports 24. A rotor shaft 40 extends between the supports 24 and is supported thereby, one end of the shaft being connected to the motor 28. The shaft 40 carries the cylindrical member 42, comprising the apparatus rotor. The processing chamber 44 is formed between the inner cylindrical surface 46 of the cylindrical member 30 and the outer cylindrical surface 48 of rotor 42 and face body 51. The ends of the chamber are closed against leakage by end seals 50 that surround the shaft 40.


In the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2 the cylindrical member 42 is shown with its axis of rotation roughly coincident, or concentric, with the longitudinal axis of the cylindrical member 30. The processing chamber 44 is shown having a radial dimension of H.


In another embodiment, as illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4 for example, the cylindrical member 42 has its axis of rotation not coincident with, but rather eccentric, relative to the longitudinal axis of the cylindrical member 30. The processing chamber 44 has a smaller radial dimension G and a larger radial dimension H diametrically opposite. The processing chamber 44 is therefore circumferentially alternately convergent from the portion having the dimension H to the portion having the dimension G at which portion the surfaces 46, 48 are spaced a minimum distance apart and the maximum shear is obtained in the flowing material; the chamber 44 is then divergent from the portion having the dimension G to the portion having the dimension H.


Rather than the horizontal orientation of FIG. 1, the reactor can be configured vertically with the outlet 52 at the top. Other orientations can be used as well. Also, other inlet and outlet configurations can be used. For example, in FIG. 3 a series of inlets 14 positioned along the length of the reactor 8 and passing through the cylindrical member 30 supply gas into the processing chamber 44. FIG. 4 shows an embodiment in which both the inlet (not shown) and outlet 52 are disposed at the lowermost part of the cylindrical member 30, while the gas is fed into the processing chamber 44 by a separate inlet 146. In a general embodiment, the reactants are pumped into the inlets 14, through the processing chamber 44 and out an outlet. The inlets 14 and outlets 52 can be at opposite ends of the length of the processing chamber 44 to allow mixing and reacting along the length of the processing chamber 44.


U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/214,538 entitled “Process for High Shear Gas-Liquid Reactions” to Holl filed on Jun. 27, 2000, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure, describes the use of the reactor 8 for gas/liquid reaction. The reactor emulsifies the gas into the liquid providing increased contact between the liquid and gas for more efficient reactions. The inventor of the present invention discovered that a gas-in-liquid emulsification can be created by narrowing the radial dimension between the surfaces 46, 48 of the processing chamber 44 while rapidly rotating the rotor cylindrical member 42 relative to the stator cylindrical member 30.


For the gas-in-liquid emulsification to occur, the radial dimension between the surfaces 46, 48 of the processing chamber 44 should be approximately equal to or less than the combined thickness of the two laminar boundary layers back-to-back. As the material being processed flows in the processing chamber 44 a respective boundary layer forms on each of the surfaces 46 and 48, the thickness of which is determined by the viscosity and other factors of the material being processed and the relative flow velocity of the material over the surface. The laminar boundary layer for a fluid flowing over a flat surface along a path length x, which in the invention is taken as one circumferential flow length around the rotor surface, may be determined by the equation:
δ=4.91NR


where NRX is the product of length x and the flow velocity divided by the kinematic viscosity.


In addition to having a radial dimension requirement, the peripheral speed of the rotor cylindrical member 42 relative to the stator cylindrical member 30 should exceed approximately four meters per second for the gas-in-liquid emulsification to occur. The upper limit on the peripheral speed is determined by the application. For example, too great a speed might destroy living microbes or long molecular chains. Also, too great a speed can subject the reactor 8 to unnecessary stress and strain.


The required radial dimension and peripheral speed can vary depending on conditions. The radial dimension requirement and peripheral speed required for the onset of the emulsification phenomenon can be determined experimentally for given reactants under specified conditions. The onset of this emulsification phenomenon is indicated by the appearance of a white colored turbidity of the fluid agitated in the processing chamber 44. The stator cylindrical member 48 can, for observation purposes, be made of glass. The grayish-white to white, almost milk like turbidity


supply energy into the processing chamber 44 through a port 58 and window 60 as illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3. This use of energy is described in greater detail in U.S. patent Ser. No. 09/853,448 entitled “Electromagnetic Wave Assisted Chemical Processing” by Holl filed May 10, 2001 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure. The energy can also be used in combination with the Taylor-vortices free gas-in-liquid emulsion for additional reaction capabilities.


Also, the cooperating surfaces 46 and 48 in FIGS. 2 and 3 can be coated with a catalyst to facilitate a chemical or biological reaction that constitutes the processing step. The catalytic material can enhance chemical, biochemical or biocidal reactions in the processing passage.


Importantly, the reactor 8 can be quickly and thoroughly cleaned. Therefore, unlike the prior art, deposits forming and blocking the irradiation is not a problem. For example, even if the reactant is a sticky opaque substance, the surfaces 46, 48 and window 60 are easily cleaned. By running the reactor 8 with clean water for enough time for the water to pass from the inlet 14 to the outlet 52, substances clinging to the surfaces 46, 48 and the window 60 are washed away. In most cases the surfaces of the processing chamber 44 are clean within five seconds. This efficient cleaning ability is due to the extremely hard sheer forces as the rotor cylindrical member 42 and stator cylindrical member 30 rotate relative to each other. In most cases, no contaminants will even form on the window 60 or surfaces 46, 48 of the processing chamber 44 due to the hard sheer forces pulling the materials through the reactor 8.


The gas/liquid reaction can be used in an oxygenation process, or an enzyme reaction process for example: Additionally, solids, such as catalytic powders, can be added to the processing chamber 44 to form a gas/liquid/solid emulsion to provide a gas/liquid/solid reaction which can also be enhanced by the applied electromagnetic or longitudinal pressure energy as described below.


Returning to FIG. 3, the illustrated embodiment is intended for an enzyme reaction process, and the axis of rotation of the rotor cylindrical member 42 is eccentrically mounted relative to the longitudinal axis of the stator cylindrical member 30, so that the radial processing chamber 44 differs in dimension circumferentially around the rotor. A heat exchange structure is provided having an outer casing 32 and heat exchange material 34, since such processes usually are exothermic and surplus heat must be removed for optimum operative conditions for the microorganisms. A series of oxygen feed inlets 14 are arranged along the length of the stator and the oxygen fed therein is promptly emulsified into the broth, providing uniformly dispersed, micron-fine bubbles instead of being sparged therein with mm size bubbles of non-uniform distribution, as with conventional enzyme reaction systems. The carbon dioxide that is produced is vented from the upper part of the processing passage through a vent 56. The reactor according to FIG. 3 is designed to operate continuously and provides a continuous and uniform CO2 removal along the upper portion of the rotor which is constantly wetted with a film of broth of uniform mixedness of all ingredients. Also shown is the port 58 and window 60 as described with reference to FIG. 2.


The apparatus of the invention is generically a reactor process and apparatus, and a reactor consists of the vessels used to produce desired products by physical or chemical means, and is frequently the heart of a commercial processing plant. Its configurations, operating characteristics, and underlying engineering principles constitute reactor technology. Besides stoichiometry and kinetics, reactor technology includes requirements for introducing and removing reactants and products, supplying and withdrawing heat, accommodating phase changes and material transfers, assuring efficient contacting among reactants, and providing for catalyst replenishment or regeneration. These issues are taken into account when one translates reaction kinetics and bench-scale data into the design and manufacture of effective pilot plants, and thereafter scale up such plants to larger sized units, and ultimately designs and operates commercial plants.


While the specification describes particular embodiments of the present invention, those of ordinary skill can devise variations of the present invention without departing from the inventive concept.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for providing a large interfacial contact area between one or more liquids and one or more gases, comprising: two cylindrical members, at least one of which is mounted for rotation relative to the other, said cylindrical members having opposing surfaces spaced to form an annular processing chamber therebetween providing a flow path for the liquid and gas;the annular, processing chamber having a gap distance defined by a distance between the opposing surfaces;the cylindrical members in a state of relative rotation at a relative rotation rate;the gap distance and relative rotation rate are such as to form a gas-in-liquid emulsion of the one or more gases in the one or more liquids;one of the two cylindrical members having a first central axis, and the second of the two cylindrical members having a second central axis, the second central axis located a distance away from the first central axis;the one or more liquid and the one or more gases, and any mixture and reaction product thereof form respective laminar boundary layers, and the gap distance being equal to or less than the back-to-back radial thicknesses of the laminar boundary layers;the two cylindrical members have opposing surfaces having smoothnesses such that formation of Taylor vortices in the processing chamber is inhibited and the one or more liquids and one or more gases forming the gas-in-liquid emulsion react in the processing chamber.
  • 2. A method for producing a large interfacial contact area between a liquid and a gas, comprising: passing a liquid and gas to be processed in a flow path through an annular processing chamber between two cylindrical members at least one of which is mounted for rotation relative to the other, one of the two cylindrical members having a first central axis, a second of the two cylindrical members having a second central axis of rotation, the second central axis spaced apart from the first central axis;rotating at least one of the cylindrical members relative to the other fast enough and setting the distance between the facing surfaces of the two cylindrical members small enough so as to form a gas-in-liquid emulsion of the gas in the liquid;the liquid and the gas, and any mixture and reaction product thereof form respective laminar boundary layers, and the gap distance being equal to or less than the back-to-back radial thicknesses of the laminar boundary layers;the two cylindrical members have opposing surfaces having smoothnesses such that formation of Taylor vortices in the processing chamber is inhibited and if liquid and gas forming the gas-in-liquid emulsion react in the processing chamber.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of and claims the benefit of all prior filing dates claimed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/894,996, filed Jun. 27, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,742,774, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. application Ser. No. 09/894,996 claims the benefit of the prior filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/214,538, filed Jun. 27, 2000, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. application Ser. No. 09/894,996 is also a continuation-in-part and claims priority of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/345,813, filed Jul. 2, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,082; of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/802,037, filed Mar. 7, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,471,392; and of U.S. application No. 09/853,448, filed May 10, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,999. This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/894,996, filed Jun. 27, 2001, which claims the benefit of the prior filing date of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/214,538, filed Jun. 27, 2000, herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (93)
Number Name Date Kind
591494 Pond Oct 1897 A
2261257 Kiesskalt et al. Nov 1941 A
2295740 Keen Sep 1942 A
2314598 Phelan Mar 1943 A
2474006 Maycock Jun 1949 A
2577247 Irwin Dec 1951 A
3095349 Rich Jun 1963 A
3215642 Levy Nov 1965 A
3595531 Williams et al. Jul 1971 A
3841814 Eckhardt Oct 1974 A
3870082 Holl Mar 1975 A
4000993 Holl Jan 1977 A
4057331 Ong et al. Nov 1977 A
4071225 Holl Jan 1978 A
4073567 Lakerveld et al. Feb 1978 A
4174907 Suh et al. Nov 1979 A
4198383 Konsetov et al. Apr 1980 A
4251576 Osborn et al. Feb 1981 A
4287075 Fujiwara et al. Sep 1981 A
4306165 Kitabayashi et al. Dec 1981 A
4311570 Cowen et al. Jan 1982 A
4315172 Intichar et al. Feb 1982 A
4335180 Traut Jun 1982 A
4405491 Sando et al. Sep 1983 A
4556467 Kuhn et al. Dec 1985 A
4593754 Holl Jun 1986 A
4670103 Holl Jun 1987 A
4708198 Holl Nov 1987 A
4744521 Singer et al. May 1988 A
4769131 Noll et al. Sep 1988 A
4778631 Cobbs et al. Oct 1988 A
4784218 Holl Nov 1988 A
4889909 Besecke et al. Dec 1989 A
4921473 Lee et al. May 1990 A
4930708 Chen Jun 1990 A
4983307 Nesathurai Jan 1991 A
5154973 Imagawa et al. Oct 1992 A
5198137 Rutz et al. Mar 1993 A
5204416 Mercer et al. Apr 1993 A
5212278 Pfandner May 1993 A
5227637 Herold et al. Jul 1993 A
5268140 Rutz et al. Dec 1993 A
5279463 Holl Jan 1994 A
5300019 Bischof et al. Apr 1994 A
5335992 Holl Aug 1994 A
5358775 Horn, III Oct 1994 A
5370824 Nagano et al. Dec 1994 A
5370999 Stuart Dec 1994 A
5391603 Wessel et al. Feb 1995 A
5395914 Wilharm et al. Mar 1995 A
5449652 Swartz et al. Sep 1995 A
5471037 Goethel et al. Nov 1995 A
5484647 Nakatani et al. Jan 1996 A
5506049 Swei et al. Apr 1996 A
5523169 Rafferty et al. Jun 1996 A
5538191 Holl Jul 1996 A
5552210 Horn, III et al. Sep 1996 A
5554323 Tsukimi et al. Sep 1996 A
5558820 Nagano et al. Sep 1996 A
5576386 Kempter et al. Nov 1996 A
5658485 Cava et al. Aug 1997 A
5658994 Burgoyne, Jr. et al. Aug 1997 A
5659006 White Aug 1997 A
5674004 Takeuchi Oct 1997 A
5693742 White et al. Dec 1997 A
5739193 Walpita et al. Apr 1998 A
5754936 Jansson May 1998 A
5855865 Lambert et al. Jan 1999 A
5874516 Burgoyne, Jr. et al. Feb 1999 A
5929138 Mercer et al. Jul 1999 A
5974867 Forster et al. Nov 1999 A
5998533 Weber et al. Dec 1999 A
6039784 Luk Mar 2000 A
6040935 Michalicek Mar 2000 A
6074472 Jachow et al. Jun 2000 A
6093636 Carter et al. Jul 2000 A
6134950 Forster et al. Oct 2000 A
6143052 Kiyokawa et al. Nov 2000 A
6176991 Nordman Jan 2001 B1
6190034 Nielsen et al. Feb 2001 B1
6281433 Decker et al. Aug 2001 B1
6391082 Holl May 2002 B1
6464936 Mowat et al. Oct 2002 B1
6471392 Holl et al. Oct 2002 B1
6742774 Holl Jun 2004 B2
6752529 Holl Jun 2004 B2
20010030295 Holl Oct 2001 A1
20020038582 Holl Apr 2002 A1
20020078793 Holl Jun 2002 A1
20020089074 Holl Jul 2002 A1
20020148640 Holl Oct 2002 A1
20030043690 Holl Mar 2003 A1
20030066624 Holl Apr 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
299 02 348 Apr 1999 DE
299 19 570 Jan 2000 DE
0 219 357 Apr 1987 EP
0 660 336 Jun 1995 EP
891 152 Mar 1962 GB
1 232 644 May 1971 GB
1 252 192 Nov 1971 GB
2 192 558 Jan 1988 GB
58 144549 Aug 1983 JP
3 279991 Dec 1991 JP
11322920 Nov 1999 JP
2000-213876 Aug 2000 JP
369 939 Apr 1973 SU
957 991 Sep 1982 SU
1 737 241 May 1992 SU
WO 97 12665 Apr 1997 WO
WO 97 42639 Nov 1997 WO
WO 98 49675 Nov 1998 WO
WO 02 071451 Sep 2002 WO
WO 03 022415 Mar 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040222536 A1 Nov 2004 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60214538 Jun 2000 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09894996 Jun 2001 US
Child 10857305 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 09853448 May 2001 US
Child 09894996 US
Parent 09802037 Mar 2001 US
Child 09853448 US
Parent 09345813 Jul 1999 US
Child 09802037 US