Process for making pressurized liquefied natural gas from pressured natural gas using expansion cooling

Abstract
This invention relates to process for liquefying a pressurized gas stream rich in methane. In a first step of the process, a first fraction of a pressurized feed stream, preferably at a pressure above 11,000 kPa, is withdrawn and entropically expanded to a lower pressure to cool and at least partially liquefy the withdrawn first fraction. A second fraction of the feed stream is cooled by indirect heat exchange with the expanded first fraction. The second fraction is subsequently expanded to a lower pressure, thereby at least partially liquefying the second fraction of the pressurized gas stream. The liquefied second fraction is withdrawn from the process as a pressurized product stream having a temperature above −112° C. and a pressure at or above its bubble point pressure.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates to a process for liquefaction of natural gas and other methane-rich gas streams, and more particularly relates to a process to produce pressurized liquid natural gas (PLNG).




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Because of its clean burning qualities and convenience, natural gas has become widely used in recent years. Many sources of natural gas are located in remote areas, great distances from any commercial markets for the gas. Sometimes a pipeline is available for transporting produced natural gas to a commercial market. When pipeline transportation is not feasible, produced natural gas is often processed into liquefied natural gas (which is called “LNG”) for transport to market.




In the design of a LNG plant, one of the most important considerations is the process for converting natural gas feed stream into LNG. The most common liquefaction processes use some form of refrigeration system.




LNG refrigeration systems are expensive because so much refrigeration is needed to liquefy natural gas. A typical natural gas stream enters a LNG plant at pressures from about 4,830 kPa (700 psia) to about 7,600 kPa (1,100 psia) and temperatures from about 20° C. (68° F.) to about 40° C. (104° F.). Natural gas, which is predominantly methane, cannot be liquefied by simply increasing the pressure, as is the case with heavier hydrocarbons used for energy purposes. The critical temperature of methane is −82.5° C. (−116.5° F.). This means that methane can only be liquefied below that temperature regardless of the pressure applied. Since natural gas is a mixture of gases, it liquefies over a range of temperatures. The critical temperature of natural gas is between about −85° C. (−121° F.) and −62° C. (−80° F.). Typically, natural gas compositions at atmospheric pressure will liquefy in the temperature range between about −165° C. (−265° F.) and −155° C. (−247° F.). Since refrigeration equipment represents such a significant part of the LNG facility cost, considerable effort has been made to reduce the refrigeration costs and to reduce the weight of the liquefaction process for offshore applications. There is an incentive to keep the weight of liquefaction equipment as low as possible to reduce the structural support requirements for liquefaction plants on such structures.




Although many refrigeration cycles have been used to liquefy natural gas, the three types most commonly used in LNG plants today are: (1) “cascade cycle” which uses multiple single component refrigerants in heat exchangers arranged progressively to reduce the temperature of the gas to a liquefaction temperature, (2) “multi-component refrigeration cycle” which uses a multi-component refrigerant in specially designed exchangers, and (3) “expander cycle” which expands gas from a high pressure to a low pressure with a corresponding reduction in temperature. Most natural gas liquefaction cycles use variations or combinations of these three basic types.




The cascade system generally uses two or more refrigeration loops in which the expanded refrigerant from one stage is used to condense the compressed refrigerant in the next stage. Each successive stage uses a lighter, more volatile refrigerant which, when expanded, provides a lower level of refrigeration and is therefore able to cool to a lower temperature. To diminish the power required by the compressors, each refrigeration cycle is typically divided into several pressure stages (three or four stages is common). The pressure stages have the effect of dividing the work of refrigeration into several temperature steps. Propane, ethane, ethylene, and methane are commonly used refrigerants. Since propane can be condensed at a relatively low pressure by air coolers or water coolers, propane is normally the first-stage refrigerant. Ethane or ethylene can be used as the second-stage refrigerant. Condensing the ethane exiting the ethane compressor requires a low-temperature coolant. Propane provides this low-temperature coolant function. Similarly, if methane is used as a final-stage coolant, ethane is used to condense methane exiting the methane compressor. The propane refrigeration system is therefore used to cool the feed gas and to condense the ethane refrigerant and ethane is used to further cool the feed gas and to condense the methane refrigerant.




A mixed refrigerant system involves the circulation of a multi-component refrigeration stream, usually after precooling to about −35° C. (−31° F.) with propane. A typical multi-component system will comprise methane, ethane, propane, and optionally other light components. Without propane precooling, heavier components such as butanes and pentanes may be included in the multi-component refrigerant. The nature of the mixed refrigerant cycle is such that the heat exchangers in the process must routinely handle the flow of a two-phase refrigerant. This requires the use of large specialized heat exchangers. Mixed refrigerants exhibit the desirable property of condensing over a range of temperatures, which allows the design of heat exchange systems that can be thermodynamically more efficient than pure component refrigerant systems.




The expander system operates on the principle that gas can be compressed to a selected pressure, cooled, typically be external refrigeration, then allowed to expand through an expansion turbine, thereby performing work and reducing the temperature of the gas. It is possible to liquefy a portion of the gas in such an expansion. The low temperature gas is then heat exchanged to effect liquefaction of the feed. The power obtained from the expansion is usually used to supply part of the main compression power used in the refrigeration cycle. The typical expander cycle for making LNG operates at pressures under about 6,895 kPa (1,000 psia). The cooling has been made more efficient by causing the components of the warming stream to undergo a plurality of work expansion steps.




It has been recently proposed to transport natural gas at temperatures above −112° C. (−170° F.) and at pressures sufficient for the liquid to be at or below its bubble point temperature. For most natural gas compositions, the pressure of the natural gas at temperatures above −112° C. will be between about 1,380 kPa (200 psia) and about 4,480 kPa (650 psia). This pressurized liquid natural gas is referred to as PLNG to distinguish it from LNG, which is transported at near atmospheric pressure and at a temperature of about −162° C. (−260° F.). Processes for making PLNG are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,950,453 by R. R. Bowen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,956,971 by E. T. Cole et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,023,942 by E. R. Thomas et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,016,665 by E. T. Cole et al.




U.S. Pat. No. 6,023,942 by E. R. Thomas et al. discloses a process for making PLNG by expanding feed gas stream rich in methane. The feed gas stream is provided with an initial pressure above about 3,100 kPa (450 psia). The gas is liquefied by a suitable expansion means to produce a liquid product having a temperature above about −112° C. (−170° F.) and a pressure sufficient for the liquid product to be at or below its bubble point temperature. Prior to the expansion, the gas can be cooled by recycle vapor that passes through the expansion means without being liquefied. A phase separator separates the PLNG product from gases not liquefied by the expansion means. Although the process of U.S. Pat. No. 6,023,942 can effectively produce PLNG, there is a continuing need in the industry for a more efficient process for producing PLNG.




SUMMARY




This invention discloses a process for liquefying a pressurized gas stream rich in methane. In a first step, a first fraction of a pressurized feed stream, preferably at a pressure above 11,032 kPa (1,600 psia), is withdrawn and entropically expanded to a lower pressure to cool and at least partially liquefy the withdrawn first fraction. A second fraction of the feed stream is cooled by indirect heat exchange with the expanded first fraction. The second fraction is subsequently expanded to a lower pressure, thereby at least partially liquefying the second fraction of the pressurized gas stream. The liquefied second fraction is withdrawn from the process as a pressurized product stream having a temperature above −112° C. (−170° F.) and a pressure at or above its bubble point pressure.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention and its advantages will be better understood by referring to the following detailed description and the following drawings:





FIG. 1

is a schematic flow diagram of one embodiment for producing PLNG in accordance with the process of this invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic flow diagram of a second embodiment for producing PLNG which is similar to the process shown in

FIG. 1

except that external refrigeration is used to pre-cool the incoming gas stream.





FIG. 3

is a schematic flow diagram of a third embodiment for producing PLNG in accordance with the process of this invention which uses three expansion stages and three heat exchangers for cooling the gas to PLNG conditions.





FIG. 4

is a schematic flow diagram of a fourth embodiment for producing PLNG in accordance with the process of this invention which uses four expansion stages and four heat exchangers for cooling the gas to PLNG conditions.





FIG. 5

is a schematic flow diagram of a fifth embodiment for producing PLNG in accordance with the process of this invention.





FIG. 6

is a graph of cooling and warming curves for a natural gas liquefaction plant of the type illustrated schematically in

FIG. 3

, which operates at high pressure.




The drawings illustrate specific embodiments of practicing the process of this invention. The drawings are not intended to exclude from the scope of the invention other embodiments that are the result of normal and expected modifications of the specific embodiments.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is an improved process for liquefying natural gas by pressure expansion to produce a methane-rich liquid product having a temperature above about −112° C. (−170° F.) and a pressure sufficient for the liquid product to be at or below its bubble point. This methane-rich product is sometimes referred to in this description as pressurized liquid natural gas (“PLNG”). In the broadest concept of this invention, one or more fractions of high-pressure, methane-rich gas is expanded to provide cooling of the remaining fraction of the methane-rich gas. In the liquefaction process of the present invention, the natural gas to be liquefied is pressurized to a relatively high pressure, preferably at above 11,032 kPa (1,600 psia). The inventors have discovered that liquefaction of natural gas to produce PLNG can be thermodynamically efficient using open-loop refrigeration at relatively high pressure to provide pre-cooling of the natural gas before its liquefaction by pressure expansion. Before this invention, the prior art has not been able to efficiently make PLNG using open loop refrigeration as the primary pre-cooling process.




The term “bubble point” as used in this description means the temperature and pressure at which a liquid begins to convert to gas. For example, if a certain volume of PLNG is held at constant pressure, but its temperature is increased, the temperature at which bubbles of gas begin to form in the PLNG is the bubble point. Similarly, if a certain volume of PLNG is held at constant temperature but the pressure is reduced, the pressure at which gas begins to form defines the bubble point pressure at that temperature. At the bubble point, the liquefied gas is saturated liquid. For most natural gas compositions, the bubble point pressure of the natural gas at temperatures above −112° C. will be above about 1,380 kPa (200 psia). The term natural gas as used in this description means a gaseous feed stock suitable for manufacturing PLNG. The natural gas could comprise gas obtained from a crude oil well (associated gas) or from a gas well (non-associated gas). The composition of natural gas can vary significantly. As used herein, a natural gas stream contains methane (C


1


) as a major component. The natural gas will typically also contain ethane (C


2


), higher hydrocarbons (C


3+


), and minor amounts of contaminants such as water, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen, dirt, iron sulfide, wax, and crude oil. The solubilities of these contaminants vary with temperature, pressure, and composition. If the natural gas stream contains heavy hydrocarbons that could freeze out during liquefaction or if the heavy hydrocarbons are not desired in PLNG because of compositional specifications or their value as condensate, the heavy hydrocarbon are typically removed by a separation process such as fractionation prior to liquefaction of the natural gas. At the operating pressures and temperatures of PLNG, moderate amounts of nitrogen in the natural gas can be tolerated since the nitrogen can remain in the liquid phase with the PLNG. Since the bubble point temperature of PLNG at a given pressure decreases with increasing nitrogen content, it will normally be desirable to manufacture PLNG with a relatively low nitrogen concentration.




Referring to

FIG. 1

, pressurized natural gas feed stream


10


that enters the liquefaction process will typically require further pressurization by one or more stages of compression to obtain a preferred pressure above 11,032 kPa (1,600 psia), and more preferably above 13,800 kPa (2,000 psia). It should be understood, however, that this compression stage would not be required if the feed natural gas is available at a pressure above 12,410 kPa. After each compression stage, the compressed vapor is cooled, preferably by one or more conventional air or water coolers. For ease of illustrating the process of the present invention,

FIG. 1

shows only one stage of compression (compressor


50


) followed by one cooler (cooler


90


).




A major portion of stream


12


is passed through heat exchanger


61


. A minor portion of the compressed vapor stream


12


is withdrawn as stream


13


and passed through an expansion means


70


to reduce the pressure and temperature of gas stream


13


, thereby producing a cooled stream


15


that is at least partially liquefied gas. Stream


15


is passed through heat exchanger


61


and exits the heat exchanger as stream


24


. In passing through the heat exchanger


61


, stream


15


cools by indirect heat exchange the pressurized gas stream


12


as it passes through heat exchanger


61


so that the stream


17


exiting heat exchanger


61


is substantially cooler than stream


12


.




Stream


24


is compressed by one or more compression stages with cooling after each stage. In

FIG. 1

, after the gas is pressured by compressor


51


, the compressed stream


25


is recycled by being combined with the pressurized feed stream, preferably by being combined with stream


11


upstream of cooler


90


.




Stream


17


is passed through an expansion means


72


for reducing pressure of stream


17


. The fluid stream


36


exiting the expansion means


72


is preferably passed to one or more phase separators which separate the liquefied natural gas from any gas that was not liquefied by expansion means


72


. The operation of such phase separators is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The liquefied gas is then passed as product stream


37


having a temperature above −112° C. (−170° F.) and a pressure at or above its bubble point pressure to a suitable storage or transportation means (not shown) and the gas phase from a phase separator (stream


38


) may be used as fuel or recycled to the process for liquefaction.





FIG. 2

is a diagrammatic illustration of another embodiment of the invention that is similar to the embodiment of

FIG. 1

in which the like elements to

FIG. 1

have been given like numerals. The principal differences between the process of FIG.


2


and the process of

FIG. 1

are that in

FIG. 2

process (1) the vapor stream


38


that exits the top of separator


80


is compressed by one or more stages of compression by compression device


73


to approximately the pressure of vapor stream


11


and the compressed stream


39


is combined with feed stream


11


and (2) stream


12


is cooled by indirect heat exchanger against a closed-cycle refrigerant in heat exchanger


60


. As stream


12


passes through heat exchanger


60


, it is cooled by stream


16


that is connected to a conventional, closed-loop refrigeration system


91


. A single, multi-component, or cascade refrigeration system


91


may be used. A cascade refrigeration system could comprise at least two closed-loop refrigeration cycles. The closed-loop refrigeration cycles may use, for example and not as a limitation on the present invention, refrigerants such as methane, ethane, propane, butane, pentane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and nitrogen. Preferably, the closed-loop refrigeration system


91


uses propane as the predominant refrigerant. A boil-off vapor stream


40


may optionally be introduced to the liquefaction process to reliquefy boil-off vapor produced from PLNG.

FIG. 2

also shows a fuel stream


44


that may be optionally withdrawn from vapor stream


38


.





FIG. 3

shows a schematic flow diagram of a third embodiment for producing PLNG in accordance with the process of this invention which uses three expansion stages and three heat exchangers for cooling the gas to PLNG conditions. In this embodiment, a feed stream


110


is compressed by one or more compression stages with one or more after-coolers after each compression stage. For simplicity,

FIG. 3

shows one compressor


150


and one after-cooler


190


. A major portion of the high pressure stream


112


is passed through a series of three heat exchangers


161


,


162


, and


163


before the cooled stream


134


is expanded by expansion means


172


and passed into a conventional phase separator


180


. The three heat exchangers are


161


,


162


, and


163


are each cooled by open-loop refrigeration with none of the cooling effected by closed-loop refrigeration. A minor fraction of the stream


112


is withdrawn as stream


113


(leaving stream


114


to enter heat exchanger


161


). Stream


113


is passed through a conventional expansion means


170


to produce expanded stream


115


, which is then passed through heat exchanger


161


to provide refrigeration duty for cooling stream


114


. Stream


115


exits the heat exchanger


161


as stream


124


and it is then passed through one or more stages of compression, with two compression stages shown in

FIG. 3

compressors


151


and


152


with conventional after-coolers


192


and


196


.




A fraction of the stream


117


exiting heat exchanger


161


is withdrawn as stream


118


(leaving stream


119


to enter heat exchanger


162


) and stream


118


is expanded by an expansion means


171


. The expanded stream


121


exiting expansion means


171


is passed through heat exchangers


162


and


161


and one or more stages of compression. Two compression stages are shown in

FIG. 3

using compressors


153


and


154


with after-cooling in conventional coolers


193


and


196


.




In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, the overhead vapor stream


138


exiting the phase separator


180


is also used to provide cooling to heat exchangers


163


,


162


, and


161


.




In the storage, transportation, and handling of liquefied natural gas, there can be a considerable amount of what is commonly referred to as “boil-off,” the vapors resulting from evaporation of liquefied natural gas. The process of this invention can optionally re-liquefy boil-off vapor that is rich in methane. Referring to

FIG. 3

, boil-off vapor stream


140


is preferably combined with vapor stream


138


prior to passing through heat exchanger


163


. Depending on the pressure of the boil-off vapor, the boil-off vapor may need to be pressure adjusted by one or more compressors or expanders (not shown in the Figures) to match the pressure at the point the boil-off vapor enters the liquefaction process.




Vapor stream


141


, which is a combination of streams


138


and


140


, is passed through heat exchanger


163


to provide cooling for stream


120


. From heat exchanger


163


the heated vapor stream (stream


142


) is passed through heat exchanger


162


where the vapor is further heated and then passed as stream


143


through heat exchanger


161


. After exiting heat exchanger


161


, a portion of stream


128


may be withdrawn from the liquefaction process as fuel (stream


144


). The remaining portion of stream


128


is passed through compressors


155


,


156


, and


157


with after-cooling after each stage by coolers


194


,


195


, and


196


. Although cooler


196


is shown as being a separate cooler from cooler


190


, cooler


196


could be eliminated from the process by directing stream


133


to stream


111


upstream of cooler


190


.





FIG. 4

illustrates a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the present invention in which the like elements to

FIG. 3

have been given like numerals. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 4

, three expansion cycles using expansion devices


170


,


171


, and


173


and four heat exchangers


161


,


162


,


163


, and


164


pre-cool the a natural gas feed stream


100


before it is liquefied by expansion device


172


. The embodiment of

FIG. 4

has a process configuration similar to that illustrated in

FIG. 3

except for an added expansion cycle. Referring to

FIG. 4

, a fraction of stream


120


is withdrawn as stream


116


and pressure expanded by expansion device


173


to a lower pressure stream


123


. Stream


123


is then passed in succession through heat exchangers


164


,


162


, and


161


. Stream


129


exiting heat exchanger


161


is compressed and cooled by compressors


158


and


159


and after-coolers


197


and


196


.





FIG. 5

shows a schematic flow diagram of a fourth embodiment for producing PLNG in accordance with the process of this invention that uses three expansion stages and three heat exchangers but in a different configuration from the embodiment shown in FIG.


3


. Referring to FIG., a stream


210


is passed through compressors


250


and


251


with after cooling in conventional after-coolers


290


and


291


. The major fraction of stream


214


exiting after-cooler


291


is passed through heat exchanger


260


. A first minor fraction of stream


214


is withdrawn as stream


242


and passed through heat exchanger


262


. A second minor fraction of stream


214


is withdrawn as stream


212


and passed through a conventional expansion means


270


. An expanded stream


220


exiting expansion means


270


is passed through heat exchanger


260


to provide part of the cooling for the major fraction of stream


214


that passes through heat exchanger


260


. After exiting heat exchanger


260


, the heated stream


226


is compressed by compressors


252


and


253


with after-cooling by conventional after-coolers


292


and


293


. A fraction of stream


223


exiting heat exchanger


260


is withdrawn as stream


224


and passed through an expansion means


271


. The expanded stream


225


exiting expansion means


271


is passed through heat exchangers


261


and


260


to also provide additional cooling duty for the heat exchangers


260


and


261


. After exiting heat exchanger


260


, the heated stream


227


is compressed by compressors


254


and


255


with after-cooling by conventional after-coolers


295


and


296


. Streams


226


and


227


, after compression to approximately the pressure of stream


214


and suitable after-cooling, are recycled by being combined with stream


214


. Although

FIG. 5

shows the last stages of the after-cooling of streams


226


and


227


being performed in after-coolers


293


and


296


, those skilled in the art would recognize that after-coolers


293


and


296


could be replaced by one or more after-coolers


291


if streams


226


and


227


are introduced to the pressurized vapor stream


210


upstream of cooler


291


.




After exiting heat exchanger


261


, stream


230


is passed through expansion means


272


and the expanded stream is introduced as stream


231


into a conventional phase separator


280


. PLNG is removed as stream


255


from the lower end of the phase separator


280


at a temperature above −112° C. and a pressure sufficient for the liquid to be at or below its bubble point. If expansion means


272


does not liquefy all of stream


230


, vapor will be removed as stream


238


from the top of phase separator


280


.




Boil-off vapor may optionally be introduced to the liquefaction system by introducing a boil-off vapor stream


239


to vapor stream


238


prior to its passing through heat exchanger


262


. The boil-off vapor stream


239


should be at or near the pressure of the vapor stream


238


to which it is introduced.




Vapor stream


238


is passed through heat exchanger


262


to provide cooling for stream


242


which passes through heat exchanger


262


. From heat exchanger


262


, heated stream


240


is compressed by compressors


256


and


257


with after-cooling by conventional after-coolers


295


and


297


before being combined with stream


214


for recycling.




The efficiency of the liquefaction process of this invention is related to how closely the enthalpy/temperature warming curve of the composite cooling stream, of the entropically expanded high pressure gas, is able to approach the corresponding cooling curve of the gas to be liquefied. The “match” between these two curves will determine how well the expanded gas stream provides refrigeration duty for the liquefaction process. There are, however, certain practical considerations which apply to this match. For example, it is desirable to avoid temperature “pinches” (excessively small differences in temperature) in the heat exchangers between the cooling and warming streams. Such pinches require prohibitively large amounts of heat transfer area to achieve the desired heat transfer. In addition, very large temperature differences are to be avoided since energy losses in heat exchangers are dependent on the temperature differences of the heat exchanging fluids. Large energy losses are in turn associated with heat exchanger irreversibilities or inefficiencies which waste refrigeration potential of the near-isentropically expanded gas.




The discharge pressures of the expansion means (expansion means


70


in

FIGS. 1 and 2

; expansion means


170


and


171


in

FIG. 3

; expansion means


170


,


171


, and


173


in

FIG. 4

; and expansion means


270


and


271


in

FIG. 3

) are controlled as closely as possible to substantially match the cooling and warming curves. A good adaptation of the warming and cooling curves of the expanded gases to the natural gas can be attained in the heat exchangers by the practice of the present invention, so that the heat exchange can be accomplished with relatively small temperature differences and thus energy-conserving operation. Referring to

FIG. 3

, for example, the output pressure of expansion means


170


and


171


are controlled to produce pressures in streams


115


and


121


to ensure substantially matching, parallel cooling/warming curves for heat exchangers


161


and


162


. The inventors have discovered that high thermodynamic efficiencies of the present invention for making PLNG result from pre-cooling the pressurized gas to be liquefied at relatively high pressure and having the discharge pressure of the expanded fluid at a significantly higher pressure than expanded fluids used in the past. In the present invention, discharge pressure of the expansion means (for example, expansion means


170


and


171


in

FIG. 3

) used to pre-cool fractions of the pressurized gas will exceed 1,380 kPa (200 psia), and more preferably will exceed 2,400 kPa (350 psia). Referring to the process shown in

FIG. 3

, the process of the present invention is thermodynamically more efficient than conventional natural gas liquefaction techniques that typically operate at pressures under 6,895 kPa (1,000 psia) because the present invention provides (1) better matching of the cooling curves, which can be obtained by independently adjusting the pressure of the expanded gas streams


115


and


121


to ensure closely matching, parallel cooling curves for fluids in heat exchangers


161


and


162


, (2) improved heat transfer between fluids in the heat exchangers


161


and


162


due to elevated pressure of all streams in the heat exchangers, and (3) reduced process compression horsepower due to lower pressure ratio between the natural gas feed stream


114


and the pressure of the expanded gas streams (recycle streams


124


,


126


, and


128


) and the reduced flow rate of the expanded gas streams.




In designing a liquefaction plant that implements the process of this invention, the number of discrete expansion stages will depend on technical and economic considerations, taking into account the inlet feed pressure, the product pressure, equipment costs, available cooling medium and its temperature. Increasing the number of stages improves thermodynamic performance but increases equipment cost. Persons skilled in the art could perform such optimizations in light of the teachings of this description.




This invention is not limited to any type of heat exchanger, but because of economics, plate-fin and spiral wound heat exchangers in a cold box are preferred, which all cool by indirect heat exchange. The term “indirect heat exchange,” as used in this description and claims, means the bringing of two fluid streams into heat exchange relation without any physical contact or intermixing of the fluids with each other. Preferably all streams containing both liquid and vapor phases that are sent to heat exchangers have both the liquid and vapor phases equally distributed across the cross section area of the passages they enter. To accomplish this, distribution apparati can be provided by those skilled in the art for individual vapor and liquid streams. Separators (not shown in the drawings) can be added to the multi-phase flow streams


15


in

FIGS. 1 and 2

as required to divide the streams into liquid and vapor streams. Similarly, separators (also not shown) can be added to the multi-phase flow stream


121


of FIG.


3


and stream


225


of FIG.


4


.




In

FIGS. 1-5

, the expansion means


72


,


172


, and


272


can be any pressure reduction device or devices suitable for controlling flow and/or reducing pressure in the line and can be, for instance, in the form of a turboexpander, a Joule-Thomson valve, or a combination of both, such as, for example, a Joule-Thomson valve and a turboexpander in parallel, which provides the capability of using either or both the Joule-Thomson valve and the turboexpander simultaneously.




Expansion means


70


,


170


,


171


,


173


,


270


, and


271


as shown in

FIGS. 1-5

are preferably in the form of turboexpanders, rather than Joule-Thomson valves, to improve overall thermodynamic efficiency. The expanders used in the present invention may be shaft-coupled to suitable compressors, pumps, or generators, enabling the work extracted from the expanders to be converted into usable mechanical and/or electrical energy, thereby resulting in a considerable energy saving to the overall system.




EXAMPLE




A hypothetical mass and energy balance was carried out to illustrate the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, and the results are shown in the Table below. The data were obtained using a commercially available process simulation program called HYSYSTM (available from Hyprotech Ltd. of Calgary, Canada); however, other commercially available process simulation programs can be used to develop the data, including for example HYSIM™, PROII™, and ASPEN PLUS™, which are familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art. The data presented in the Table are offered to provide a better understanding of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, but the invention is not to be construed as unnecessarily limited thereto. The temperatures, pressures, compositions, and flow rates can have many variations in view of the teachings herein. This example assumed the natural gas feed stream


10


had the following composition in mole percent: C


1


:94.3%; C


2


:3.9%; C


3


:0.3%; C


4


:1.1%; C


5


:0.4%.





FIG. 6

is a graph of cooling and warming curves for a natural gas liquefaction plant of the type illustrated schematically in FIG.


3


. Curve


300


represents the warming curve of a composite stream consisting of the expanded gas streams


115


,


122


and


143


in heat exchanger


161


and curve


301


represents the cooling curve of the natural gas (stream


114


) as it passes through these heat exchanger


161


. Curves


300


and


301


are relatively parallel and the temperature differences between the curves are about 2.8° C. (5° F.).




A person skilled in the art, particularly one having the benefit of the teachings of this patent, will recognize many modifications and variations to the specific embodiment disclosed above. For example, a variety of temperatures and pressures may be used in accordance with the invention, depending on the overall design of the system and the composition of the feed gas. Also, the feed gas cooling train may be supplemented or reconfigured depending on the overall design requirements to achieve optimum and efficient heat exchange requirements. Additionally, certain process steps may be accomplished by adding devices that are interchangeable with the devices shown. As discussed above, the specifically disclosed embodiment and example should not be used to limit or restrict the scope of the invention, which is to be determined by the claims below and their equivalents.















TABLE











Stream




Temperature




Pressure




Flowrate

















#




Deg C.




deg F.




kPa




psia




kgmol/hr




mmscfd




















110




26.7




80




5516




800




36360




730






112




18.3




65




20684




3000




36360




730






113




18.3




65




20684




3000




45973




923






114




18.3




65




20684




3000




69832




1402






115




−40.0




−40




7033




1020




45973




923






117




−37.2




−35




20643




2994




69832




1402






118




−37.2




−35




20643




2994




21866




439






119




−37.2




−35




20643




2994




47966




963






120




−56.7




−70




20615




2990




47966




963






121




−59.4




−75




8584




1245




21866




439






122




−40.0




−40




8570




1243




21866




439






124




15.6




60




7019




1018




45973




923






126




15.6




60




8556




1241




21866




439






128




15.6




60




2820




409




13149




264






133




18.3




65




20684




3000




79495




1596






134




−63.9




−83




20608




2989




47966




963






135




−95.0




−139




2861




415




47966




963






137




−95.0




−139




2861




415




37805




759






138




−95.0




−139




2861




415




10161




204






140




−90.0




−130




2861




415




2989




60






141




−93.9




−137




2861




415




13149




264






142




−59.4




−75




2848




413




13149




264






143




−40.0




−40




2834




411




13149




264






144




15.6




60




2820




409




1494




30













Claims
  • 1. A process for liquefying a pressurized gas stream rich in methane, which comprises the steps of:(a) withdrawing a first fraction of the pressured gas stream and entropically expanding the withdrawn first fraction to a lower pressure to cool and at least partially liquefy the withdrawn first fraction; (b) cooling a second fraction of the pressurized gas stream by indirect heat exchange with the expanded first fraction; (c) expanding the second fraction of the pressurized gas stream to a lower pressure, thereby at least partially liquefying the second fraction of the pressurized gas stream; and (d) removing the liquefied second fraction from the process as a pressurized product stream having a temperature above −112° C. (−170° F.) and a pressure at or above its bubble point pressure.
  • 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the pressurized gas stream has a pressure above 11,032 kPa (1,600 psia).
  • 3. The process of claim 1 wherein the cooling of the second fraction against the first fraction is in one or more heat exchangers.
  • 4. The process of claim 1 wherein further comprising before step (a) the additional steps of withdrawing a fraction of the pressured gas stream and entropically expanding the withdrawn fraction to a lower pressure to cool the withdrawn fraction and cooling the remaining fraction of the pressurized gas stream by indirect heat exchange with the expanded fraction.
  • 5. The process of claim 4 wherein the steps of withdrawing and expanding a fraction of the pressurized gas stream are repeated in two separate, sequential stages before step (a) of claim 1.
  • 6. The process of claim 5 wherein the first stage of indirect cooling of the second fraction is in a first heat exchanger and the second stage of indirect cooling of the second fraction is in a second heat exchanger.
  • 7. The process of claim 1 further comprises, after the expanded first fraction cools the second fraction, the additional steps of compressing and cooling the expanded first fraction, and thereafter recycling the compressed first fraction by combining it with the pressurized gas stream at a point in the process before step (b).
  • 8. The process of claim 1 further comprising the step of passing the expanded second fraction of step (c) to a phase separator to produce a vapor phase and a liquid phase, said liquid phase being the product stream of step (d).
  • 9. The process of claim 1 wherein the pressure of the expanded first fraction exceeds 1,380 kPa (200 psia).
  • 10. The process of claim 1 further comprising the additional steps of controlling the pressure of the expanded first fraction to obtain substantial matching of the warming curve of expanded first fraction and the cooling curve of the second fraction as the expanded first fraction cools by indirect heat exchange the second fraction.
  • 11. The process of claim 1 wherein substantially all of cooling and liquefaction of the pressurized gas is by at least two work expansions of the pressurized gas.
  • 12. The process of claim 1 further comprising, before step (a), the additional step of pre-cooling the pressurized gas stream against a refrigerant of a closed-loop refrigeration system.
  • 13. The process of claim 12 wherein the refrigerant is propane.
  • 14. A process for liquefying a pressurized gas stream rich in methane, which comprises the steps of:(a) withdrawing a first fraction of the pressurized gas stream and expanding the withdrawn first fraction to a lower pressure to cool the withdrawn first fraction; (b) cooling a second fraction of the pressurized gas stream in a first heat exchanger by indirect heat exchange against the expanded first fraction; (c) withdrawing from the second fraction a third fraction, thereby leaving a fourth fraction of the pressurized gas stream, and expanding the withdrawn third fraction to a lower pressure to cool and at least partially liquefy the withdrawn third fraction; (d) cooling the fourth fraction of the pressurized gas stream in a second heat exchanger by indirect heat exchange with the at least partially-liquefied third fraction; (e) further cooling the fourth fraction of step (d) in a third heat exchanger; (f) pressure expanding the fourth fraction to a lower pressure, thereby at least partially liquefying the fourth fraction of the pressurized gas stream; (g) passing the expanded fourth fraction of step (f) to a phase separator which separates vapor produced by the expansion of step (f) from liquid produced by such expansion; (h) removing vapor from the phase separator and passing the vapor in succession through the third heat exchanger, the second heat exchanger and the first heat exchanger; (i) compressing and cooling the vapor exiting the first heat exchanger and returning the compressed, cooled vapor to the pressurized stream for recycling; and (j) removing from the phase separator the liquefied fourth fraction as a pressurized product stream having a temperature above −112° C. (−170° F.) and a pressure at or above its bubble point pressure.
  • 15. The process of claim 14 wherein the process further comprises the step of introducing boil-off vapor to the vapor stream removed from the phase separator before the vapor stream is passed through the third heat exchanger.
  • 16. The process of claim 14 further comprises, after the expanded first fraction cools the second fraction, the additional steps of compressing and cooling the expanded first fraction, and thereafter recycling the compressed first fraction by combining it with the pressurized gas stream at a point in the process before step (b).
  • 17. The process of claim 14 wherein the process further comprises, after the third fraction is passed through the second heat exchanger, the additional steps of passing the third fraction through the first heat exchanger, thereafter compressing and cooling the third fraction, and introducing the compressed and cooled third fraction to the pressurized gas stream for recycling.
  • 18. The process of claim 14 wherein the pressurized gas stream has a pressure above 11,032 kPa (1,600 psia).
  • 19. A process for liquefying a pressurized gas stream rich in methane, which comprises the steps of:(a) withdrawing from the pressured gas stream a first fraction and passing the withdrawn first fraction through a first heat exchanger to cool the first fraction; (b) withdrawing from the pressured gas stream a second fraction, thereby leaving a third fraction of the pressurized gas stream, and expanding the withdrawn second fraction to a lower pressure to cool the withdrawn second fraction; (c) cooling the third fraction of the pressurized gas stream in a second heat exchanger by indirect heat exchange with the cooled second fraction; (d) withdrawing from the cooled third fraction a fourth fraction, thereby leaving a fifth fraction of the pressurized gas stream, and expanding the withdrawn fourth fraction to a lower pressure to cool and at least partially liquefy the withdrawn fourth fraction; (e) cooling the fifth fraction of the pressurized gas stream in a third heat exchanger by indirect heat exchange with the expanded fourth fraction; (f) pressure expanding the cooled first fraction and the cooled fifth fraction to a lower pressure, thereby at least partially liquefying the cooled first fraction and the cooled fifth fraction, and passing the expanded first and fifth fractions to a phase separator which separates vapor produced by such expansion from liquid produced by such expansion; (g) removing vapor from the phase separator and passing the vapor through the first heat exchanger to provide cooling of the first withdrawn fraction; and (h) removing liquid from the phase separator as a product stream having a temperature above −112° C. (−170° F.) and a pressure at or above its bubble point pressure.
  • 20. A process for liquefying a pressurized gas stream rich in methane, which comprises the steps of:(a) withdrawing from the pressured gas stream a first fraction and passing the withdrawn first fraction through a first heat exchanger to cool the first fraction; (b) withdrawing from the pressured gas stream a second fraction, thereby leaving a third fraction of the pressurized gas stream, and expanding the withdrawn second fraction to a lower pressure to cool the withdrawn second fraction; (c) cooling the third fraction of the pressurized gas stream in a second heat exchanger by indirect heat exchange with the cooled second fraction; (d) withdrawing from the cooled third fraction a fourth fraction, thereby leaving a fifth fraction of the pressurized gas stream, and expanding the withdrawn fourth fraction to a lower pressure to cool and at least partially liquefy the withdrawn fourth fraction; (e) cooling the fifth fraction of the pressurized gas stream in a third heat exchanger by indirect heat exchange with the expanded fourth fraction; (f) combining the cooled first fraction and the cooled fifth fraction to form a combined stream; (g) pressure expanding the combined stream to a lower pressure, thereby at least partially liquefying the combined stream, and passing the expanded combined stream to a phase separator which separates vapor produced by the expansion from liquid produced by the expansion; (h) removing vapor from the phase separator and passing the vapor through the first heat exchanger to provide cooling of the first withdrawn fraction; and (i) removing liquid from the phase separator as a product stream having a temperature above −112° C. (−170° F.) and a pressure at or above its bubble point pressure.
  • 21. The process of claim 20 which further comprises the steps of, after the expanded second fraction cools the third fraction in the second heat exchanger, compressing and cooling the second fraction and thereafter introducing the second fraction to the pressurized gas stream for recycling.
  • 22. The process of claim 20 which further comprises the steps of, after the expanded fourth fraction cools the fifth fraction in the third heat exchanger, passing the fourth fraction through the second heat exchanger, thereafter compressing and cooling the fourth fraction, and then introducing the fourth fraction to the pressurized gas stream for recycling.
  • 23. The process of claim 20 which further comprises the steps of introducing boil-off vapor to the vapor stream withdrawn from the phase separator before the vapor stream is passed through the first heat exchanger.
  • 24. The process of claim 20 wherein the pressurized gas stream has a pressure above 13,790 kPa (2,000 psia).
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/172,548 filed Dec. 17, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (51)
Number Name Date Kind
1574119 Seligmann Feb 1926 A
2903858 Bocquet Sep 1959 A
3162519 Peters et al. Dec 1964 A
3298805 Secord et al. Jan 1967 A
3349571 Nebgen Oct 1967 A
3358460 Smith et al. Dec 1967 A
3383873 Becker May 1968 A
3433026 Swearingen Mar 1969 A
3477509 Arendt Nov 1969 A
3616652 Engel Nov 1971 A
3677019 Olszewski Jul 1972 A
3724226 Pachaly Apr 1973 A
3735600 Dowdell et al. May 1973 A
4147525 Bradley Apr 1979 A
4157904 Campbell et al. Jun 1979 A
4315407 Creed et al. Feb 1982 A
4456459 Brundige, Jr. Jun 1984 A
4541852 Newton et al. Sep 1985 A
4548629 Chiu Oct 1985 A
4563201 Brundige, Jr. Jan 1986 A
4582519 Someya et al. Apr 1986 A
4638639 Marshall et al. Jan 1987 A
4687499 Aghili Aug 1987 A
4698081 Aghili Oct 1987 A
4727723 Durr Mar 1988 A
4778497 Hanson et al. Oct 1988 A
4894076 Dobracki et al. Jan 1990 A
5036671 Nelson et al. Aug 1991 A
5199266 Johansen Apr 1993 A
5271231 Ha et al. Dec 1993 A
5363655 Kikkawa et al. Nov 1994 A
5473900 Low Dec 1995 A
5600969 Low Feb 1997 A
5615561 Houshmand et al. Apr 1997 A
5651269 Prevost et al. Jul 1997 A
5669234 Houser et al. Sep 1997 A
5755114 Foglietta May 1998 A
5768912 Dubar Jun 1998 A
5799505 Bonaquist et al. Sep 1998 A
5802874 Voit Sep 1998 A
5836173 Lynch et al. Nov 1998 A
5878814 Breivik et al. Mar 1999 A
5950453 Bowen et al. Sep 1999 A
5956971 Cole et al. Sep 1999 A
6016665 Cole et al. Jan 2000 A
6041619 Fischer et al. Mar 2000 A
6047747 Bowen et al. Apr 2000 A
6085528 Woodall et al. Jul 2000 A
6089028 Bowen et al. Jul 2000 A
6209350 Kimble, III Apr 2001 B1
6269656 Johnston Aug 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2039352 Aug 1980 GB
WO 9701069 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9713109 Apr 1997 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
Broeker, Roger J.; CNG and MLG -New Natural Gas Transportation Processes, American Gas Journal, Jul. 1969.
Bennett, C. P.; Marine Transportation of LNG at Intermediate Temperature, CME (Mar. 1979), pp. 63-64.
Broeker, R. J.; CNG and MLG-New Natural Gas Transportation Process, American Gas Journal (Jul. 1969) pp. 138-140.
Faridany, E. K.; Ffooks R. C.; and Meikle, R.B.; A Pressure LNG System, European Offshore Petroleum Conference & Exhibition (Oct. 21-24, 1980), vol. Eur. 171, pp. 245-254.
Faridany, E. K., Secord, H. C., O'Brien, J. V., Pritchard, J. F., and Banister, M.; The Ocean Phoenix Pressure-LNG System, Gastech 76 (1976), New York, pp. 267-280.
Fluggen, Prof. E. and Backhaus, Dr. I. H.; Pressurised LNG-and the Utilisation of Small Gas Fields, Gas Tech 78, LNG/LPG Conference (Nov. 7, 1978), Monte Carlo pp. 195-204.
Turboexpanders, Engineering Data Book, Gas Processor Suppliers Association. (1987), vol. I, Sec. 1-16, pp. 13-40; 13-41.
Lynch, J. T. and Pitman, R. N.; Improving Throughput and Ethane Recovery at GPM's Goldsmith Gas Plant, Proceeding of the Seventy-Fifth Gas Processors Association Annual Convention, (Mar. 11-13, 1996), Denver, Colorado, pp. 219-217.
Maddox, R. N. Sheerar, L. F., and Erbar, J. H.; Cryogenic Expander Processing, Gas Conditioning and Processing, (Jan. 1982) vol. 3, 13-9;13-10.
Perret, J.; Techniques in the Liquefaction of Natural Gas, French Natural Gas (Nov. 11, 1996), pp. 1537-1539.
Petsinger, R. E.; LNG on the Move, GAS, (Dec. 1967), pp. 45-59.
Broeker, R. J.; A New Process for the Transportation of Natural Gas, Proceedings of the First International Conference on LNG (1968), Chicago, Illinois, Session No. 5, paper 30, pp. 1-11.
Lynch, J. T. and Pitman, R. N.; Texas Plant Retrofit Improves Throughput C2, Recovery, Oil and Gas Journal (Jun. 3, 1996), pp. 41-48.
Minta, Moses and Smith Jr., Joseph L.; An Entropy Flow Optimization Technique for Helium Liquefaction Cycles, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, vol. 29, (1984), pp. 469-478.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/172548 Dec 1999 US