This invention relates, in one embodiment, to a process for manufacturing contact lenses comprising at least one thermochromic compound. More particularly, the process relates to a manufacturing process for photocuring polymerizable mixtures in the presence of thermochromic compounds to produce contact lenses comprising thermochromic compounds.
Precision spectral filters filter specific wavelengths of visible or UV radiation. This allows for the production of optical articles, such as glasses, which can be tailored to block specific wavelengths of light to produce optical articles for different uses, including the protection of the cornea, lens and retina from specific harmful radiation wavelengths. For example, various sunglasses have been used to protect human eyes from strong light including photochromic glasses, polarized glasses and glasses for specific activities including shooting and fishing. Photochromic spectacles darken upon exposure to certain wavelengths of light and typically exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light and brighten when UV light is removed. Often, such photochromic spectacles include a prescription for vision correction.
Adapting certain technology, including photochromic technology to contact lenses is more difficult than adapting the same technology to spectacles. Additional factors, such an oxygen permeability, comfort and fit of the resulting lens, must be taken into account. The manufacturing process of contact lenses is also more complicated. Typically, contact lenses are formed by irradiating a photoinitiator in the presence of one or more polymerizable materials. In the case of photochromic contact lenses, it is desirable to include the photochromic dye in the reactive mixture containing the photoinitiator and polymerizable materials that, upon polymerization, forms the contact lens. Unfortunately, certain dyes, including photochromic dyes have the potential to interfere with the activation of the photoinitiator.
Polymerizable mixtures may also be cured using other free radical based chain reaction polymerization, including thermal polymerization.
The invention comprises, in one form thereof, a process for manufacturing contact lenses comprising at least one thermochromic compound. The process includes (1) selecting a photoinitiator that absorbs radiation at a first wavelength and a thermochromic compound that absorbs radiation at the same first wavelength but does not substantially absorb at this wavelength at a second temperature, (2) maintaining the reaction mixture at the second temperature and (3) exposing the reaction mixture to radiation that includes the first wavelength.
The present invention is disclosed with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The examples set out herein illustrate several embodiments of the invention but should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Any chemical name preceded by (meth), for example (meth)acrylate, includes both the unsubstituted and methyl substituted compound.
Fixed light absorbing compounds are compounds which display temperature independent light absorption.
Referring to
Initiators generate free radicals that can initiate a chemical chain reaction. A photoinitiator is a compound that, upon exposure to certain wavelength of light, generates free radicals that can initiate a chemical chain reaction. In one embodiment, the photoinitiator absorbs within the visible range (about 380 nm to about 780 nm) of the electromagnetic spectrum. Suitable visible light photoinitiators are known in the art and include, but are not limited to aromatic alpha-hydroxy ketones, alkoxyoxybenzoins, acetophenones, acylphosphine oxides, bisacylphosphine oxides, and a tertiary amine plus a diketone, mixtures thereof and the like. Illustrative examples of photoinitiators are 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone, 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-propan-1-one, bis(2,6-dimethoxybenzoyl)-2,4-4-trimethylpentyl phosphine oxide (DMBAPO), bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phenyl phosphineoxide (Irgacure 819), 2,4,6-trimethylbenzyldiphenyl phosphine oxide and 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl diphenylphosphine oxide, benzoin methyl ester and a combination of camphorquinone and ethyl 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)benzoate. Commercially available visible light initiator systems include Irgacure 819, Irgacure 1700, Irgacure 1800, Irgacure 819, Irgacure 1850 (all from Ciba Specialty Chemicals) and Lucirin TPO initiator (available from BASF). These and other photoinitators which may be used are disclosed in Volume III, Photoinitiators for Free Radical Cationic & Anionic Photopolymerization, 2nd Edition by J. V. Crivello& K. Dietliker; edited by G. Bradley; John Wiley and Sons; New York; 1998. The initiator is used in the reaction mixture in effective amounts to initiate photopolymerization of the reaction mixture, e.g., from about 0.1 to about 2 parts by weight per 100 parts of reactive monomer.
In one embodiment visible light photoinitiators include alpha-hydroxy ketones such as Irgacure® (e.g. Irgacure 1700 or 1800) available from CIBA; various organic phosphine oxides, 2,2′-azo-bis-isobutyro-nitrile; diethoxyacetophenone; 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone; 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone; phenothiazine; diisopropylxanthogen disulfide; benzoin or benzoin derivatives; and the like. In one embodiment, the initiator absorbs light and is activated at wavelengths below about 420 nm.
In another embodiment, thermal initiation is used in place of or in conjunction with photoinitation. Examples of thermal initiators include lauroyl peroxide, benzoyl peroxide, isopropyl percarbonate, azobisisobutyronitrile, mixtures thereof and the like.
Thermochromic compounds are compounds that display temperature dependent light absorption. Thermochromic compounds include compounds such as leuco dyes and liquid crystal particles which are generally used for their temperature dependent changes in light absorption as well as compounds such as photochromic compounds which display changes in the rate or degree to which they absorb light in their activated state.
Examples of thermochromic liquid crystals include cholesteryl nonanoate and cyanobiphenyls. Additional examples are disclosed in “Liquid Crystals”, D. Demus and H. Sackman, Gordon and Breach 1967. Examples of leuco dyes include spirolactones, fluorans, spiropyrans, fulgides and combinations thereof. The liquid crystals and leuco dyes may be incorporated into polymerizable mixtures as microcapsules.
Photochromic dye is any compound that is capable of transforming between a first “clear,” “bleached” or “unactivated” ground state and a second “colored”, darkened or “activated” state in response to the absorption of certain wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation (or “actinic radiation”). In one embodiment, the photochromic dye, when in an activated state, absorbs within the visible range (380 nm to 780 nm) of the electromagnetic spectrum. Examples of suitable photochromic dyes are known in the art and include, without limitation, the following classes of materials: chromenes, such as naphthopyrans, benzopyrans, indenonaphthopyrans and phenanthropyrans; spiropyrans, such as spiro (benzindoline) naphthopyrans, spiro (indoline) benzopyrans, spiro (indoline) naphthopyrans, spiro (indoline) quinopyrans and spiro (indoline) pyrans; oxazines, such as spiro (indoline) naphthoxazines, spiro (indoline) pyridobenzoxazines, spiro (benzindoline) pyridobenzoxazines, spiro (benzindoline) naphthoxazines and spiro (indoline) benzoxazines; mercury dithizonates, fulgides, fulgimides and mixtures of such photochromic compounds.
Additional suitable photochromic dyes include, without limitation, organo-metal dithiozonates, such as (arylazo)-thioformic arylhydrazidates, e.g., mercury dithizonates; and fulgides and fulgimides, naphthoxazines, spirobenzopyrans; polymerizable spirobenzopyrans and spirobenzopyrans; polymerizable fulgides; polymerizable naphthacenediones; polymerizable spirooxazines; and polymerizable polyalkoxylated napthopyrans. The photochromic dyes may be used alone or in combination with one or more other appropriate and complementary photochromic dyes.
Still other useful photochromic dyes include indeno-fused naphthopyrans chosen from an indeno[2′,3′:3,4]naphtho[1,2-b]pyran and an indeno[1′,2′:4,3]naphtho[2,1-b]pyran, which are more specifically disclosed in US2009/0072206 and US2006/0226401 and those cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,364,291, and combinations thereof. Other suitable photochromic compounds are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,556,750, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Non-limiting examples of suitable photochromic dyes include naphthopyrans such as those shown in Table 1. The dyes may include polymerizable functional groups such that they are copolymerized into the resulting contact lens. Examples of polymerizable functional groups include (meth)acrylates, (meth)acrylamides, vinyls and the like. In one embodiment, a photochromic dye is selected that, when in an activated state, absorbs across the visible spectrum but, when unactivated, absorbs below about 430 nm and less than about 10% across the visible spectrum.
The amount of thermochromic compound used will be that effective to achieve desired reduction in percent transmission at the specific wavelengths where selected thermochromic compound is active. The particular amount used also will depend upon the coloring strength and molar absorptivity of the selected compound(s), the lens material selected as well as the thickness of the lens.
In another embodiment the contact lens may contain a mixture of thermochromic compounds, at least one thermochromic compound in mixture with other fixed light absorbing compounds, including pigments, dyes and UV absorbing compounds or may contain multiple layers of thermochromic compounds, such as are used to make polarizing lenses.
Once the photoinitiator and thermochromic compound have been selected, step 104 is executed wherein a mixture of contact lens-forming materials is disposed in a mold. Step 104 is explained in additional detail with reference to
Referring to
The invention may be used to provide hard or soft contact lenses made of any known lens material, or material suitable for manufacturing such lenses. Preferably, the lenses of the invention are soft contact lenses having water contents of about 0 to about 90 percent, and in another embodiment between about 20 and about 75% water. In yet another embodiment the contact lenses of the present invention have a water content of at least about 25%. The lenses of the present invention may also have other desirable properties, including a tensile modulus of less than about 200 psi, in some embodiments less than about 150 psi and in other embodiments less than about 100 psi. The lenses may further have oxygen permeabilities of greater than about 50 psi, and in some embodiments greater than about 100 psi. It should be understood that combinations of the foregoing properties are desirable, and the above referenced ranges may be combined in any combination.
In one embodiment, the lenses are made of hydrophilic components, silicone-containing components and mixtures thereof to form polymers such as siloxanes, hydrogels, silicone hydrogels, and combinations thereof. Material useful for forming the lenses of the invention may be made by reacting blends of macromers, monomers, polymers and combinations thereof along with additives such as polymerization initiators. Suitable materials include, without limitation, silicone hydrogels made from silicone macromers and hydrophilic monomers.
Reaction mixtures for making the contact lenses are well known and the components of such mixtures are commercially available. Examples polymers suitable for forming contact lenses include but are not limited to etafilcon A, genfilcon A, lenefilcon A, polymacon, balafilcon, acquafilcon, comfilcon, galyfilcon, senofilcon, narafilcon and lotrafilcon. In another embodiment, contact lens formulations include etafilcon, senofilcon, balafilcon, galyfilcon, lotrafilcon, comfilcon, filcon II 3, asmofilcon A, and silicone hydrogels, as prepared in U.S. Pat. No. 5,998,498; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/532,943, a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/532,943, filed on Aug. 30, 2000, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,087,415, 6,087,415, 5,760,100, 5,776,999, 5,789,461, 5,849,811, 5,965,631, 7,553,880, WO2008/061992, US2010/048847. These patents are hereby incorporated by reference for the hydrogel compositions contained therein.
In one embodiment, the reaction mixture used is a HEMA based hydrogel, such as etafilcon A. Etafilcon A, disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,680,336 and 4,495,313 incorporated herein in their entireties by reference, generally is a formulation of 100 parts by weight (“pbw”) HEMA, about 1.5 to about 2.5 pbw MAA, approximately 0.3 to about 1.3 pbw ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, about 0.05 to about 1.5 pbw 1,1,1-trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate, and about 0.017 to about 0.024 pbw of a visibility tint. The phrase “polymerizable monomers” includes monomers with large molecular weights, sometimes referred to as macromers. A reaction mixture of different polymerizable monomers may also be used, resulting in the production of a co-polymer.
In one embodiment, mixture 200 also includes one or more selected visible light photoinitiators that are activated by exposure to visible light to initiate a chain reaction that causes the aforementioned monomers to polymerize.
Mixture 200 further includes the selected thermochromic compound and in one embodiment photochromic dye that becomes colored upon exposure to light but will revert to its original color shortly after the light is discontinued. In is unactivated (clear) state, the dye absorbs below about 430 nm and becomes activated. Once activated, the absorbance range changes to overlap with the visible spectrum (380-780 nm) and thus becomes colored. This color, in turn, blocks the very wavelengths that would otherwise activate an photoinitiator that typically absorbs below about 420 nm
The presence of both the thermochromic compound and the photoinitiator in the same reaction mixture can make controlled activation of the photoinitiator problematic. Without wishing to be bound to any particular theory, applicants believe the activation of the thermochromic compound in the same spectral region as the photoinitiator causes the dye to at least partially “shield” the photoinitiator. The incomplete activation of the initiator prevents curing and/or results in a non-uniform or anisotropic cure that causes material defects and stresses to form within the lens. These defects negatively impact the mechanical and optical properties of the resulting contact lens. One embodiment of the present invention where the thermochromic compound comprises at least one photochromic compound, the process utilizes filters to remove at least a portion of the wavelengths that result in excitation of the dye while transmitting wavelengths that activate the photoinitiator. See step 106 of
Suitable filters are selected based on the spectra of the photochromic dye and photoinitiator. Referring to
Although dye 300 is somewhat active between 400 nm and 420 nm, photoinitiator 302 is more responsive (i.e. has a larger molar absorbtivity) than the dye at such wavelengths. At least a portion of the wavelengths that activate the dye (e.g. those below 400 nm) have been omitted. In one embodiment, a long pass filter is used to omit wavelengths below about 400 nm but transmit wavelengths above about 400 nm. In another embodiment, a different band pass filter is used to transmit only wavelengths within the range of about 400 nm to about 420 nm, but remove wavelengths outside of this range. In yet another embodiment, a band pass filter selects wavelengths within the range of about 420 to about 440 nm. These wavelengths were selected based on the spectra presented in
Applicants have discovered that the optical and mechanical properties of the resulting lens can be further improved by performing the curing process at a temperature where the thermochromic dye is inactive or less active (step 108 of
In another embodiment where the thermochromic dye is a leuco dye, such as spirolactones (such as crystal violet lactone), fluorans, spiropyrans, and fulgides, in combination with weak acids such as bisphenol A, parabens, 1,2,3-triazole derivates, and 4-hydroxycoumarin, cure may be conducted at temperatures between about 5 and about 60° C. In yet another embodiment, where the thermochromic dye is a liquid crystal, such as such as cholesteryl nonanoate or cyanobiphenyl, the cure may be conducted at temperatures between about 10 and about 80° C.
Referring to the series of lens cross sections depicted in
By way of illustration, when photochromic dye (such as Dye-1, a naphthopyran photochromic compound shown in Table 1) is used, cure temperature ranges of about 55° C. to about 90° C. may be used. In another embodiment, a temperature range of about 65° C. to about 80° C. is used. In yet another embodiment a temperature of about 80° C. is used. Other dyes may have different preferred temperature ranges.
Applicant has also discovered that, although filtering the light and elevating the temperature improves the properties of the resulting lenses, at least in some instances, these are not the only factors. Contact lens properties can be further improved by balancing the light received by the mixture 200 on the exposed side 206 and mold-contacting sides 208. See
In some embodiments, for example for contact lenses with low thermochromic compound concentrations, special balancing of light intensity may not be necessary. The mixture is sufficiently thin such that the light intensity at the exposed surface and the mold-contacting sides are substantially the same. In these instances, the cured contact lens that results is adequate. Similarly, in some embodiments, it is possible to omit any special balancing by restricting the thermochromic compound to a particular region of the lens (e.g. a pupil-only thermochromic lens).
In certain instances, the intensity of the light at the mold-contacting side is substantially less than the intensity at the exposed surface—presumably due to absorption of the light by the thermochromic compound as the light passes through the mixture. In these situations, the profile of the resulting lens is less than desirable. A secondary light source can be added to illuminate from underneath an optically transparent mold to properly balance the light intensities.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the intensity of one of the light sources is increased to adjust for a loss of light intensity between the light source and the mixture 200. For example, in such an embodiment, bottom light source 606 may have an intensity greater than top light source 604 to adjust for the loss of light intensity due to the bottom light traveling through or shielded by the pallet 204. By way of illustration and not limitation, the intensity of top light source 604 may be about 1 mW/cm2 while the intensity of bottom light source may be about 2 mW/cm2. Differing intensity values are selected depending on the amount of light blocked by the respective filters and the transmissivity or shielding of the pallet 204. Similarly, filters that reduce the intensity of the light can be used to balance the intensity of the light that actually reaches the reaction mixture.
Once curing is completed, the lens is released from the mold and may be treated with a solvent to remove the diluent (if used) or any traces of unreacted components. In one embodiment the solvent removal is conducted using a primarily aqueous solution. The lens is then hydrated to form the hydrogel lens.
Using the techniques described above, several forms of contact lenses can be made. In some embodiments, the thermochromic compound is homogenously dispersed throughout the resulting contact lens. In such an embodiment, the entire contact lens is thermochromic. In other embodiments, only the central portion of the resulting contact lens includes the themochromic compound. Since the central portion rests atop the pupil, the resulting contact lens is a pupil-only thermochromic contact lens. The central portion, or central circular area may be the same size as the optic zone, which in a typical contact lens is about 9 mm or less in diameter. In one embodiment, the central circular has a diameter of between about 4 and about 9 mm and in another between about 6 and about 9 mm in diameter and in another embodiment between about 6 and about 8 mm.
The dye can be placed using a variety of techniques to provide a region of a specified diameter. For example, the composition comprising the dye may be applied to at least a portion of a molding surface via pad printing, ink jetting, spin coating and the like. In these embodiments the dye composition may comprise additional components known to be useful including binding polymers which may be reactive or non-reactive, solvent, and optionally polymerizable components, chain transfer agents, initiators and combinations thereof. The dye composition may react with the reactive mixture, or may swell and become entangled by the reactive mixture. If the dye composition is reactive, it may be partially or fully cured prior to dispensing the reactive mixture into the mold. If the dye composition is non-reactive it may be desirable to evaporate some or all of the solvent prior to dispensing the reactive mixture. The type and concentration of the non-dye components of the dye compositions which are known in the art may be used in the present invention. Examples include those disclosed in EP1448725, WO01/40846, U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,376, US20090244479, WO2006/110306 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,337,040.
If an initiator is included in the dye composition the initiator and thermochromic compound are selected to have absorption profiles which do not substantially overlap at the selected cure temperature. Multiple layers of dye composition may be applied to the mold, and the layers may contain no thermochromic, the same thermochromic compound or different thermochromic compounds. An example of this embodiment is applying alternating layers of dye composition, each containing a liquid crystal, to form a polarized contact lens. In this embodiment, the alternating layers are cured under different conditions to provide layers in which the liquid crystals have alternating orientations, creating the desired polarizing effect. In another embodiment multiple layers of the same thermochromic compound are applied, each centered, but having a different diameter, thereby producing a lens with a graduated concentration of thermochromic compound.
After the cure composition is precured or the solvent evaporated, the reactive mixture is dosed to the mold as described above. The reactive mixture may comprise at least one additional thermochromic compound, which may be the same or different than the thermochromic compound used in the dye composition layer. Alternatively, the reactive mixture may be free from thermochromic compounds. After the reactive mixture is dosed, the reactive mixture is cured.
Examples of suitable diameters include 4 mm, 6 mm, 9 mm and 11.4 mm. In one embodiment the reactive mixture comprising the thermochromic dye is deposited or dispensed via microdosing, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,560,056, and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/082,447, entitled “Pupil-Only Photochromic Contact Lenses Displaying Desirable Optics and Comfort”, co-filed on Apr. 8, 2011.
To support the theory of operation, several experiments were conducted in which the time required to cure the mixture was measured as a function of increased dye concentration. The results of these experiments demonstrated that higher dye concentration resulted in prolonged cure times. At a dye concentration of about 3% (MXP7-1631 dye) the mixture did not cure at a temperature of 40° C. See Example 9. This supports the hypothesis that the dye interferes with the activation of the photoinitiator.
To further support the theory of operation, the residual monomer concentration of a series of lenses were made with and without pad printing of a photochromic dye. The lenses were cured without being hydrated as the reaction mixture passed through a cure tunnel where they were irradiated with light as they passed through various zones. Samples were removed from the apparatus and tested for residual photoinitiator and residual monomer after passing through a certain number of zones. Thus, a sample that was removed after passing through five cure zones experienced a longer residence time than a sample that was removed after passing through two cure zones. See example 11.
The results, shown in
Similarly, rheology data was obtained for photochromic lenses made with and without filters. See Example 11. The results (
Five formulations were utilized in the follow examples. The percent composition of each sample is shown in Table 2:
The components listed in Table 2 were mixed with Glucam 20 in the following amount 55 wt % monomer with 45 wt % diluent.
A front curve mould (Zeonor) was pad printed with a dye base formed from 7% Dye-1 and 93% clear base (49.4 wt % Isopropyllactate, 12.4 wt % 1-Ethoxy-2-propanol, 0.9 wt % 1-Octanethiol, 1.63 wt % Glycerol, 35 wt % HEMA, 0.48% methacrylic acid, and 0.21 wt % Azobis-(2-methylbutyronitrile) (AMBM). The clear base was made by adding the 1-octanethiol, monomers and solvents, except for about 50-100 cc of the isopropyllactate, were mixed in a 5 liter blue cap bottle and stirred for 10 minutes. The mixture was then poured into a 5 L stainless steel reactor with stirrer and nitrogen. The mixture was stirred and heated for approximately 25 min. until the temperature was 68° C. After the temperature was stabilized at 68° C., the AMBN was dissolved in the remaining isopropyllactate and added while opening the nitrogen bleed. The polymerization was allowed to proceed for 16-24 hours after which the temperature was increased to 80° C. and the reaction was completed. The mixture was then allowed to equilibrate to room temperature.
The diameter of the print was 11.44 mm. The front and back of the curve moulds were degassed with nitrogen. The front curve mould was dosed with a reactive monomer mix that contained Control A (see Table 2) no dye in RMM. A base curve mould was placed on the front curve containing monomer and the assembled moulds were moved to a cure box and thereafter heated to a cure temperature of 45° C. The system was allowed to equilibrate for five minutes. Once equilibrated, the system was cured at 3.5 mW/cm2 with Philips TL03 lamps using CG420 filter for ten minutes. The base curve mould was removed and the front curve was hydrated in DI water at 70° C. for ten minutes. The resulting lenses were subjected to customary packaging and sterilization processes. The lenses were cross-sectioned and an image was obtained. The image is shown in
Example 2 was conducted in a substantially identical fashion as Example 1 except in that the cure temperature was 50° C. The lenses were cross-sectioned and an image was obtained. The image is shown in
Example 3 was conducted in a substantially identical fashion as Example 1 except in that the cure temperature was 55° C. The lenses were cross-sectioned and an image was obtained. The image is shown in
Example 2 was conducted in a substantially identical fashion as Example 1 except in that the cure temperature was 65° C. The lenses were cross-sectioned and an image was obtained. The image is shown in
The front and back curve moulds (Zeonor) were degassed with nitrogen. For Examples 6-8, the front curve mould was dosed with a reactive monomer mix containing 2.1% Dye-1 (Formulation B, Table 2). For Example 5 (control) Formulation A was dosed into the front curve. A base curve mould was placed on the front curve containing monomer mix. The assembled moulds were moved to a cure box and heated to 65° C. The assembly was allowed to equilibrate for five minutes. Once equilibrated, the system was cured with Philips TL03 lamps and CG420 filter for ten minutes at the cure intensity and cure set-ups specified in Table 3. The base curve mould was removed and the front curve was hydrated in DI water at 70° C. for ten minutes. The resulting lenses were subjected to customary packaging and sterilization processes.
The cross sections of the lenses made in Examples 5-8 are shown in
The photo-polymerization reaction of Formulations A-E were monitored with an ATS StressTech rheometer (available from ATS RheoSystems, 52 Georgetown Road, Bordentown, N.J. 08505) equipped with a photo-curing accessory, which included a temperature-controlled cell with a quartz lower plate and an aluminum upper plate, and an OmniCure mercury arc lamp (available from EXFO Photonic Solutions Inc., 2260 Argentia Rd., Mississauga, ON L5N 6H7 CANADA) with 420 nm band pass filter (available from Andover Corporation, 4 Commercial Drive, Salem, N.H. 03079-2800 USA) situated beneath the quartz plate. The intensity of the radiation, measured at the surface of the quartz window with an IL1400A radiometer and XRL140A sensor (available from International Light, Inc., 17 Graf Road, Newburyport, Mass. 01950), was regulated at 4.5±0.5 mW/cm2. Each formulation was evaluated at 40° C., 55° C. and 70° C.
After approximately 0.25 mL of the reactive monomer mix was placed on the lower plate of the rheometer, the 25 mm diameter upper plate was lowered to 0.500±0.001 mm above the lower plate, where it was held until after the reaction reached the gel point. The sample was allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (˜5 minutes, determined by the leveling-off of the steady shear viscosity of the sample as it warmed up) before the OmniCure was turned on and the reaction begun. During this time, while the sample was reaching thermal equilibrium, the sample chamber was purged with nitrogen gas at a rate of 400 sccm. After this initial purge the oxygen level in the sample chamber was monitored at 0.5±0.1% with a CheckPoint O2 sensor (available from PBI Dansensor, available from Topac, 101 Derby St., #203 Hingham, Mass. 02043). During the reaction the rheometer continuously monitored the strain resulting from an applied dynamic stress (fast oscillation mode), where time segments of less than a complete cycle were used to measure the strain at the applied sinusoidal stress (applied at a frequency of 1.0 Hz). The dynamic shear modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″), and gap height were monitored as a function of exposure time. As the reaction proceeded the shear modulus increased from <1 Pa to >0.1 MPa, and tan δ (=G″/G′) dropped from near infinity to less than 1. For many reactive crosslinking systems the gel point is defined as the time at which tan δ=1□ (the crossover point when G′=G″). At the time that G′ reached 100 Pa (shortly after the gel point), the restriction of the gap height on the upper plate was removed (Autotension Mode: Tension=0) so that the gap between the upper and lower plates could change as the reactive monomer mix shrank during cure, and the stress due to shrinkage was kept at a minimum. A measurement of the change in gap provides an estimate of the amount of shrinkage caused by the polymerization reaction. After a 10-minute exposure the OmniCure was turned off (i.e., the cure was terminated).
The rheology results for each of the formulations evaluated are shown in Table 4, below.
Samples C and E failed to cure at 40° C. These samples contained 2.8% photochromic dye.
A protocol was executed to determine the rate of consumption for lenses that were pad-printed with a dye composition containing approximately 7% of Dye-1 and 93 wt % of the clear base described in Example 2 in comparison to lenses that were not pad-printed with the dye composition. Formulation A from Table 2 was dispensed in the pad-printed mold. Lenses were cured with both high (8 mW/cm2) and low (4 mW/cm2) intensity cures for comparison.
The experiment was carried through as follows: Closed pad printed, lens molds containing the monomer mixes were loaded into the cure tunnel. Once the tunnel was full, the machine was completely stopped and pallets for each row were removed out of the tunnel and labeled with their location. The location of the pallet corresponds to the amount of light the lens was exposed to in the process. This process was repeated until the desired amount of samples was collected for each of the monomers mixtures and light intensities tested. The results are depicted in
The photo-polymerization reaction for each of the Formulation C, listed in Table 2, was monitored with an ATS StressTech rheometer (ATS RheoSystems, 52 Georgetown Road, Bordentown, N.J. 08505) equipped with a photo-curing accessory, which consisted of a temperature-controlled cell with a quartz lower plate and an aluminum upper plate, and an OmniCure mercury arc lamp (EXFO Photonic Solutions Inc., 2260 Argentia Rd., Mississauga, ON L5N 6H7 CANADA) with a band pass filter (Andover Corporation, 4 Commercial Drive, Salem, N.H. 03079-2800 USA) situated beneath the quartz plate. The intensity of the radiation, measured at the surface of the quartz window with an IL1400A radiometer and XRL140A sensor (International Light, Inc., 17 Graf Road, Newburyport, Mass. 01950), was regulated at 4.5±0.5 mW/cm2. The temperature was controlled at 60.0±0.1° C.
After approximately 0.25 mL of the reactive monomer mix was placed on the lower plate of the rheometer, the 25 mm diameter upper plate was lowered to 0.500±0.001 mm above the lower plate, where it was held until after the reaction reached the gel point. The sample was allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (˜5 minutes, determined by the leveling-off of the steady shear viscosity of the sample as it warmed up) before the OmniCure was turned on and the reaction begun. During this time, while the sample was reaching thermal equilibrium, the sample chamber was purged with nitrogen gas at a rate of 400 sccm. After this initial purge the oxygen level in the sample chamber was monitored at 0.5±0.1% with a CheckPoint 02 sensor (PBI Dansensor, available from Topac, 101 Derby St., #203 Hingham, Mass. 02043). During the reaction the rheometer continuously monitored the strain resulting from an applied dynamic stress (fast oscillation mode), where time segments of less than a complete cycle were used to measure the strain at the applied sinusoidal stress (applied at a frequency of 1.0 Hz). The dynamic shear modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″), and gap height were monitored as a function of exposure time. As the reaction proceeded the shear modulus increased from <1 Pa to >0.1 MPa, and tan δ (=G″/G′) dropped from near infinity to less than 1. For many reactive crosslinking systems the gel point is defined as the time at which tan δ=1 (the crossover point when G′=G″). At the time that G′ reached 100 Pa (shortly after the gel point), the restriction of the gap height on the upper plate was removed (Autotension Mode: Tension=0) so that the gap between the upper and lower plates could change as the reactive monomer mix shrank during cure, and the stress due to shrinkage was kept at a minimum. A measurement of the change in gap provides an estimate of the amount of shrinkage caused by the polymerization reaction. After a 10-minute exposure the OmniCure was turned off (i.e., the cure was terminated).
The results are shown in
While the invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof to adapt to particular situations without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope and spirit of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/501,510, filed Sep. 30, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,975,301 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/082,517 filed Apr. 8, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,877,103, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/323,426, filed Apr. 13, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3034403 | Neefe | May 1962 | A |
3808178 | Gaylord | Apr 1974 | A |
4073577 | Hofer | Feb 1978 | A |
4120570 | Gaylord | Oct 1978 | A |
4136250 | Mueller et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4139513 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4139692 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4153641 | Deichert et al. | May 1979 | A |
4182822 | Chang | Jan 1980 | A |
4189546 | Deichert et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4254248 | Friends et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4259467 | Keogh et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4260725 | Keogh et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4261875 | LeBoeuf | Apr 1981 | A |
4276402 | Chromecek et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4301012 | Puckett | Nov 1981 | A |
4327203 | Deichert et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4330383 | Ellis et al. | May 1982 | A |
4341889 | Deichert et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4343927 | Chang | Aug 1982 | A |
4355147 | Deichert et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4390676 | Loshaek et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4436887 | Chromecek et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4450264 | Cho | May 1984 | A |
4463149 | Ellis | Jul 1984 | A |
4486577 | Mueller et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4495313 | Larsen | Jan 1985 | A |
4525563 | Shibata et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4543398 | Bany et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4576453 | Borowsky | Mar 1986 | A |
4605712 | Mueller et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4659782 | Spinelli | Apr 1987 | A |
4659783 | Spinelli | Apr 1987 | A |
4661575 | Tom | Apr 1987 | A |
4669834 | Richter | Jun 1987 | A |
4680336 | Larsen et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4681412 | Lemelson | Jul 1987 | A |
4703097 | Wingler et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4707236 | Borowsky | Nov 1987 | A |
4711943 | Harvey, III | Dec 1987 | A |
4725277 | Bissonette | Feb 1988 | A |
4731079 | Stoy | Mar 1988 | A |
4837289 | Mueller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4863464 | Dusek | Sep 1989 | A |
4871785 | Froix | Oct 1989 | A |
4872876 | Smith | Oct 1989 | A |
4889664 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4952046 | Stephens et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954586 | Toyoshima et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4954587 | Mueller | Sep 1990 | A |
4973493 | Guire | Nov 1990 | A |
4997897 | Melpolder | Mar 1991 | A |
5006622 | Kunzler et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5010141 | Mueller | Apr 1991 | A |
5034461 | Lai et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5039459 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5057578 | Spinelli | Oct 1991 | A |
5070215 | Bambury et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5115056 | Mueller et al. | May 1992 | A |
5135297 | Valint, Jr. | Aug 1992 | A |
5235358 | Mutzhas et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5236969 | Kunzler et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5244981 | Seidner et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5270418 | Kunzler et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275838 | Merrill | Jan 1994 | A |
5298533 | Nandu et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5314960 | Spinelli et al. | May 1994 | A |
5331067 | Seidner et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336797 | McGee et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346946 | Yokoyama et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358995 | Lai et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5371147 | Spinelli et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5387632 | Lai et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5433898 | Thakrar et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5451617 | Lai et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5486579 | Lai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5617154 | Hoffman | Apr 1997 | A |
5645767 | Van Gemert | Jul 1997 | A |
5658376 | Noguchi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5710302 | Kunzler et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714557 | Kunzler et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5760100 | Nicolson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776999 | Nicolson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779943 | Enns et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5789461 | Nicolson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807944 | Hirt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824719 | Kunzler et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5846457 | Hoffman | Dec 1998 | A |
5849811 | Nicolson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5908906 | Kunzler et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919880 | Imafuku et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936016 | Lareginie et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944853 | Molock et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5958440 | Burrell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962548 | Vanderlaan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5965631 | Nicolson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973039 | Florent et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5981615 | Meijs et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981675 | Valint, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998498 | Vanderlaan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017121 | Chateau et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020445 | Vanderlaan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039913 | Hirt et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042756 | Muller et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6087415 | Vanderlaan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113814 | Gemert et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6174465 | Buazza et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193369 | Valint, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200626 | Grobe, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213604 | Valint, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224210 | Chateau et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6305801 | Kerns, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6337040 | Thakrar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6367929 | Maiden et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6420453 | Bowers et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423761 | Bowers et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429294 | Masuda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6767979 | Muir et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6811257 | Lehat | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822016 | McCabe et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6864299 | Komuro et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867245 | Iwata et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6943203 | Vanderlaan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7053169 | Buhler | May 2006 | B2 |
7247692 | Laredo | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249848 | Laredo et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7261844 | Tanikawa et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7364291 | Haywood et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7553880 | Nicolson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7556750 | Xiao et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7560056 | Van Gemert et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7666921 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7717556 | Walker | May 2010 | B1 |
7786185 | Rathore et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7931369 | Harris | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934830 | Blackwell et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7956131 | Arnold et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8022158 | Rathore et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8026326 | Benz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8079704 | Sanger | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8138290 | Blackwell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8273802 | Laredo et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8360574 | Ishak et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8389597 | Blackwell et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8399538 | Steffen et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8450387 | McCabe et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8470906 | Rathore et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8487058 | Liu et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8507577 | Zanini et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8618323 | Benz et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8637621 | Iwata et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8697770 | Duis et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8703891 | Broad | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8877103 | Alvarez-Carrigan | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8937110 | Alli et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8937111 | Alli et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8940812 | Reboul et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9056878 | Fujisawa et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9057821 | Broad et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9125808 | Alli et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9140825 | Alli et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9156934 | Alli et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9170349 | Mahadevan et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9244196 | Scales et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9244197 | Alli et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9260544 | Rathore et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9297928 | Molock et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9297929 | Scales et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9904074 | Duis et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9927635 | Ishak et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9975301 | Duis | May 2018 | B2 |
10310293 | Duis et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20020080451 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030103188 | Zeltzer | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142267 | Gemert et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040158028 | Buhler | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186241 | Gemert | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050128433 | Jahnke | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050218536 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050221105 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237484 | Ocampo | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243272 | Mainster et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258408 | Molock et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060050232 | Dukes et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055882 | Phelan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060226401 | Xiao et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227287 | Molock et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070035050 | Rogers | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070065633 | Mori et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080002147 | Haywood et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080125512 | Van Gemert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080186448 | Ishak et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221674 | Blum et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235047 | Broderick et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090072206 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090244479 | Zanini et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100010123 | Fujie et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100048647 | Broad | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057202 | Bogaert | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100149620 | Knowles et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100321632 | Sanger | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110051223 | Knowles et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110248415 | Alvarez-Carrigan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249235 | Duis et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120075577 | Ishak et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20150115484 | Duis et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160313571 | Alli et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1099546 | Apr 1981 | CA |
1732078 | Feb 2006 | CN |
1956686 | May 2007 | CN |
101189536 | May 2008 | CN |
101583325 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101687373 | Mar 2010 | CN |
1914028 | Oct 2010 | CN |
0277639 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0799864 | Jun 2000 | EP |
788872 | Jun 2002 | EP |
0763754 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1337395 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1054269 | May 2008 | EP |
2098192 | Sep 2009 | EP |
1039419 | Dec 1998 | ES |
2664991 | Jan 1992 | FR |
2305256 | Apr 1997 | GB |
63163321 | Jul 1988 | JP |
3107121 | May 1991 | JP |
5070770 | Mar 1993 | JP |
06258604 | Sep 1994 | JP |
8507094 | Jul 1996 | JP |
9136902 | May 1997 | JP |
9272814 | Oct 1997 | JP |
09327845 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10503764 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10513125 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2004504474 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004535598 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005511338 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006503338 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2008511026 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008536179 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009543137 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010511205 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2009021445 | Mar 2009 | KR |
584529 | Dec 1993 | RU |
328116 | Mar 1998 | TW |
1994017110 | Aug 1994 | WO |
1999027978 | Jun 1999 | WO |
1999029750 | Jun 1999 | WO |
2000022459 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2000022460 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2000026698 | May 2000 | WO |
2001030866 | May 2001 | WO |
2001040846 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001050182 | Jul 2001 | WO |
200208355 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2003003073 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003011551 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2003022321 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2003032084 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003089519 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004052631 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005032791 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005058587 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006023664 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006110306 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2008003012 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008061992 | May 2008 | WO |
2008067109 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2009099099 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010068541 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2011130137 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011130139 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Crivello, et al, Photoinitiators for Free Radical Cationic & Anionic Photopolymerisation, 2nd Edition, vol. III, pp. 275-298, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998. |
Demus et al, “Liquid Crystals”, New York; Gordon and Breach 1967. Print. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 16, 2012 for PCT/US2011/031878. |
PCT International Search Report, dated Nov. 16, 2011, for PCT Int'l. Appln. No. PCT/US2011/031878. |
People's Republic China Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2016, for Chinese Patent Appln. No. 201510593314.1. |
Anonymous: “Scotopic vision—Wikipedia”, Mar. 12, 2010 (Mar. 12, 2010), XP055674255, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Scotopic_vision&oldid=349418365 [retrieved on Mar. 6, 2020]. |
PCT International Search Report, dated Jun. 17, 2020, for PCT Int'l. Appln. No. PCT/IB2020/052307. |
Abadi, “The spectral transmittance of hydrogel contact lens filters.” University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester, 1989. Print. |
Anonymous: PureVision(TM) (balafilcon A) Visibility Tinted Contact Lenses for Continuous Wear, Apr. 27, 2005 (retrieved from the internet on May 3, 2019). |
Billmeyer, Jr. et al. Principles of Color Technology. 2nd. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1981. 47-52. Print. |
Compendium of Polymer Terminology and Nomenclature: IUPAC Recommendations 2008, edited by: Richard G. Jones, Jaroslav Kahovec, Robert Stepto, Edward S. Wilks, Michael Hess, Tatsuki Kitayama, and W. Val Metanomski. |
Flanagan, et al. “Effect of Wavelength on Discomfort Glare From Monochromatic Sources.” UMTRI-89-30; The Universit of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: Transportation Research Institute, 1989. Print. |
Green, The Sigma-Aldrich Handbook of Stains, Dyes, and Indicators. Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., 1990. Print. |
Gribble, et al., Progress in Heterocyclic Chemistry, Elsevier, 2005, pp. 31-38, vol. 17. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 16, 2012 for PCT/US2011/031879. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 26, 2012 for PCT/US2011/031880. |
ISO 18369-4:2006: Ophthalmic optics—Contact lenses—Part 4: Physicochemical properties of contact lens materials. |
Lira et al, Changes in UV-Visible Transmittance of Silicone-Hydrogel Contact Lenses Induced by Wear, Optometry and Vision Science, 2009, vol. 86, No. 4, pp. 332-339. |
PCT International Search Report, dated Aug. 3, 2011, for PCT Int'l Appln. No. PCT/US2011/031880. |
PCT International Search Report, dated Jun. 7, 2011, for PCT Int'l Appln. No. PCT/US2011/031879. |
Purslow, et al. “Ocular Surface Temperature.” Eye & Contact Lens. 31.3 (2005): 117-123. Print. |
Turygin, Applied Optics, Geometric Optics and Evaluation Methods of Optical Schemes, 1965, 131, Chapter V. |
Wilkins, et al. “Visual stress, its treatment with spectral filters, and its relationship to visually induced motion sickness.” Applied Ergomomics. 41. (2010): 509-515. Print. |
Wolffsohn, et al. “Objective clinical performance of ‘comfort-enhanced’ daily disposable soft contact lenses.” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye. 33. (2010): 88-92. Print. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180229457 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61323426 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14501510 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 15949649 | US | |
Parent | 13082517 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 14501510 | US |