This invention relates in general to the manufacturing of single-piece bladed disks, preferably for an aircraft turbine engine.
A single-piece bladed disk, also called a blisk, is usually made by milling a block of material, usually made of titanium.
Nevertheless, this process, although it is well controlled, cannot be considered to be fully optimised in that manufacturing times are very long, largely due to the large amount of material to be removed, namely up to 75% or even more by weight of the initial block of material.
Production costs may also be penalised by this long manufacturing time, which firstly involves the prolonged presence of operators at milling machines, and secondly causes fast wear of tools and particularly relatively expensive heads of milling machines.
Therefore, the purpose of the invention is to at least partly remedy the above-mentioned disadvantages of embodiments according to prior art.
To achieve this, this invention relates to a process for manufacturing a single-piece blisk, comprising:
Thus, the principle of the invention is based on the use of a preliminary step to cut a material block using an abrasive water jet, before one or several milling steps are carried out on the block.
This considerably reduces manufacturing times and costs in comparison with a process based solely on milling a solid block, considering that the abrasive water jet cutting technique is capable of removing large quantities of material in a relatively short time. For example, the time required to obtain a blisk that would have required 310 hours of machining using a prior technique will be reduced to only about 140 hours, plus a very small number of hours of cutting with the abrasive water jet.
The reduction in milling time means that the work to be done by operators working on milling machines is significantly reduced, such that they can handle several milling machines and/or also control the tooling used for cutting with the abrasive water jet.
Finally, the reduction in the milling time also advantageously significantly reduces tooling wear, particularly wear of milling machine heads, which even further reduces production costs.
Therefore, use of the process is particularly suitable for cases in which 75% or even more of the material in the original block is removed, because much of this removal can be done quickly by cutting with the abrasive water jet. It is preferably arranged such that said abrasive water jet cutting step consists of removing at least 50% by weight of said block of material. In other words, the ratio between the weight of the block at the time of the abrasive water jet cutting step and the weight of the same block at the end of this step in which the blade preforms appear, is preferably more than 2.
Note in this respect that the abrasive water jet cutting step is followed by a step to mill blade preforms, the milling step preferably being done so as to obtain profiled blade blanks, this step preferably being followed by a milling step to finish blade blanks so as to obtain blades to the final profile.
Preferably, the diameter of said single-piece blisk is greater than or equal to 800 mm. Preferably, the minimum length of the blades is 150 mm.
Preferably, the thickness of said single-piece blisk is greater than or equal to 100 mm. Nevertheless, it may be of the order of 160 mm or even more due to the potentially high performances that can be achieved by the abrasive water jet cutting technique. This thickness is approximately equal to the distance along the blisk axis covered by each blade, between the leading edge and the trailing edge.
Preferably, the blades of the single-piece blisk are twisted, the angle of twist varying up to 45° or even more.
Preferably, said material block used is made of titanium or a titanium alloy.
Preferably, said single-piece blisk is a single-piece blisk for an aircraft turbine engine.
Even more preferably, said single-piece blisk is a single-piece blisk for a turbine or compressor rotor in an aircraft turbine engine.
Other advantages and characteristics of the invention will become clear after reading the following detailed and non-limitative description.
This description will be made with reference to the appended drawings among which;
a to 2d represent views diagrammatically showing the single-piece blisk at different steps in its manufacturing process in the form of a preferred embodiment.
Firstly with reference to
The single-piece blisk, hereinafter referred to as a blisk that is to be obtained using the process according to this invention is large, in other words its diameter is greater than or equal to 800 mm, the length of its blades 2 is not less than 150 mm and the thickness e of its disk 4 is greater than or equal to 130 mm. Furthermore, the blades supported by the disk 4 with its central axis 5 are strongly twisted with an angle of twist up to or even more than 45°. For information, this angle is equal to the fictitious angle between the root 6 and the tip 8 of a specific blade 2, according to conventional practice.
A preferred embodiment of the process for manufacturing the blisk 1 will now be described with reference to
Firstly, a first turning step is performed on a block of material made of titanium alloy, also called a single-piece blank and preferably pre-machined, to machine this block for example to within 1 mm of its final dimensions.
The next step consists of cutting the solid block using an abrasive water jet so as to form the blade preforms.
This is done using a very high pressure (for example 3000 bars) and very high precision water jet cutting machine (for example a 6-axis machine). The very high water pressure transports the abrasive optimising its cutting effect on the material. The water jet is created in a known manner using a diamond or sapphire nozzle. There is also a mixing chamber used to add abrasive such as sand. A focussing gun homogenises the water and sand, focussing sand on the zone to be cut.
This abrasive jet cutting technique enables a large material removal rate and good repeatability.
It is thus perfectly suitable for removing material so as to create inter-blade spaces through the entire thickness e of the material block along its axis 5.
This is illustrated in
This abrasive water jet cutting step can be implemented by making a first cutting operation to remove a first piece of material that twists or has a spiral shape along the radial direction from the disk, followed by a second cutting operation to remove a second smaller volume of material, that also twists or has a spiral shape along the radial direction.
More precisely the left part of the diagrammatic view contained in
During its path along the above-mentioned line 118, the axis of the gun 116 moves by an appropriate additional movement relative to the axis 5 that preferably remains fixed, this additional movement essentially consisting of the axis of the gun pivoting about the radial direction and forming a first piece 114 with a generally twisted shape along the radial direction. More generally, note that the path followed by the gun 116 relative to the axis 5 is a so-called 5-axis path obtained by two simultaneous rotations. The first piece 114 is preferably removed manually by the operator as shown diagrammatically in the central part of
Following on from the above, each removal of a first piece 114 forms the surface of two directly consecutive blade preforms 102. Preferably, the first step is to cut out all the first pieces 114, the number of which depends on the number of blades to be provided in the blisk, and these pieces 114 are then removed manually before starting the second cutting operation.
This second operation is done such that the shape of the resulting blade preforms is as close as possible to the twisted shape with inverted curvature of the final blades which is difficult to approach with a single cut since the abrasive water jet passes through the block in an approximately straight line, although the blade sections are curved.
The right part of the diagrammatic view contained in
This is done by moving the focussing gun 116 along a radial line 124, a portion of which is shown in
During its path along the above-mentioned line 124, the axis of the gun 116 is driven by an appropriate additional movement relative to the axis 5 that preferably remains fixed, this additional movement essentially involving pivoting of the axis of the gun about the radial direction, and forming a second piece 120 also with a twisted shape along the radial direction. More generally, note that the path followed by the gun 116 relative to the axis 5 is a so-called 5-axis path obtained by two simultaneous rotations. This second piece 120, once completely separated from the root 5 still by abrasive water jet, preferably separates by itself without assistance by the operator, as shown diagrammatically in the right part of
In this respect, note that the gun 116 moves not only along the approximately radial line 124, but also along a circular portion (not shown) of a line extending from the inner radial end of the line 124 along the root 4 to completely separate the piece 120 from the root.
As can be seen in
Once all the second pieces 120 have been removed, all that remains of the block are the blade preforms 102 derived from the disk 4 and separated from each other by the inter-blade gaps 110.
The abrasive water jet cutting step is then completed, after removing at least 50% by weight of the block of material.
The next step is to mill the blade preforms 102 so as to obtain profiled blade blanks 202. In other words, the purpose of this step, for example done using a 5-axis milling machine, is to remove the material remaining on the blade preforms 102 to approach the final dimensions, for example within 0.6 mm.
In this case, the preforms 102 are preferably machined one by one and each forms a profiled blade blank 202, as shown in
Another milling step is then done and is called the finishing step to mill the blades 2 to achieve their final profile from the blanks 202. The tooling used enables more precise machining to obtain the final dimensions, therefore obtaining blades 2 as shown in the right part of
At this stage of the process, the remaining volume of material is less than 25% of the volume of this block just before initiation of the abrasive water jet cutting step, namely just after the above-mentioned turning step.
The process may also be continued by one or several conventional steps including a polishing step for example by manual fitting or tribofinishing, a shot blasting step, a blade cutting to length step and/or a blisk balancing step.
Obviously, an expert in the subject could make various modifications to the invention as described above, solely as non-limitative examples.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 52076 | Mar 2008 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/053485 | 3/25/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/22/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/121767 | 10/8/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6077002 | Lowe | Jun 2000 | A |
6276899 | Lambert et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7934975 | Thompson | May 2011 | B2 |
7967659 | Erickson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20030039547 | Bourgy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050025598 | Nowak et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20090325468 | El-Wardany et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100074704 | Rozic et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100307442 | Bolender et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016712 | Berlanger et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016714 | Berlanger et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016716 | Berlanger et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110023300 | Berlanger et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110041334 | Berlanger et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 285 714 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1 502 682 | Feb 2005 | EP |
2 699 850 | Jul 1994 | FR |
Entry |
---|
Zhao Wan-sheng, et al., “Machining Technology Used in Turbine Blisk”, Aviation Precision Manufacturing Technology, vol. 36 No. 5, Oct. 2000, pp. 1-5 (with English Abstract). |
Harris, I.D.: “Abrasive water jet cutting and its applications at TWI (UK)”, Welding in the World/Le Soudage Dans Le Monde, vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 277-286, XP000454830, ISSN: 0043-2288, (2004). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/921,493, filed Sep. 8, 2010, Berlanger, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/933,955, filed Sep. 22, 2010, Berlanger, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/933,978, filed Sep. 22, 2010, Berlanger, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/933,953, filed Sep. 22, 2010, Berlanger, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/933,884, filed Sep. 22, 2010, Berlanger, et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110016715 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |