The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to German Application Nos. 10 2006 058 732.4 filed Dec. 13, 2006, and 10 2007 059 804.3 filed in the German Patent Office on Dec. 11, 2007, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
1. Field
A process for operating a measurement device of the vibration type is disclosed.
2. Background Information
A measurement device of the vibration type is also known as a Coriolis measurement device in which a measurement tube through which the measurement medium flows is excited to vibrations. With a measurement device of the vibration type, the flow rate of a fluid medium flowing through a measurement tube can be measured. Other parameters of the medium, such as for example the viscosity or the density of the medium, can also be measured, either to supplement the flow rate or alone.
Vibration generators are used in the indicated measurement device of the vibration type. These vibration generators are based on an accurate measurement of at least one natural frequency of the vibration system.
In this connection mechanical transducers are used. This system is known from EP 1496341 A2, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
When used in a measurement device of the vibration type, the vibrating system relates to pipelines through which the medium to be measured flows. In this way the natural vibration of the vibrating system changes of course, and is thus dependent on the flow rate and the density of the liquid. But here it also holds that the amplitude of the measured vibration signal is maximum when the vibration system is excited to its natural frequency.
In a known measurement device of the vibration type, the measured vibration signal is amplified and fed back to the exciter arrangement. The measured vibration signal can be noisy in this connection so that frequency instabilities and other unwanted nonlinear effects can occur.
A process is disclosed for operating a measurement device of the vibration type so that it can be excited optimally with one of its natural frequencies. An exemplary process for operating a measurement device of the vibration type, includes exciting a system to vibration using an adjustable excitation frequency ω of at least one exciter arrangement; and determining from vibration parameters, a measurement quantity of a measurement medium (e.g., a fluid) of the system. In exemplary embodiments, a time-dependent force f(t)=F sin(ωt)+g(t) with at least one sinusoidal component having a force amplitude F, the adjustable excitation frequency ω, and with a possible extraneous time varying force factor g(t) (e.g., spurious force of possibly negligible value and little or no influence on f(t)), acts on at least one vibration-capable part (e.g., a tube, such as a tube containing the measurement medium) of the measurement device and is driven (e.g., driven sufficient to initiate detectable vibration of the vibration-capable part) using the exciter arrangement. A response signal of the vibration-capable part is measured and a phase shift Ψ between the response signal and the force f of a signal component which oscillates with a frequency ω is determined. The phase shift Ψ can be used as an input for a frequency controller so that the excitation frequency is automatically adjusted changed as a function of Ψ.
In the drawings, exemplary embodiments are shown wherein like elements have like reference numbers; however, additional embodiments and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the detailed description.
and
An exemplary process disclosed herein can use a time-dependent force f(t)=F sin(ωt)+g(t) with at least one sinusoidal component having a force amplitude F. The force F can be a constant for a given measurement which can, if desired, be adjusted by actuation of a force actuator acting on a portion of the system, such as a flow tube configured to contain a measurement medium. The force f(t) includes an adjustable frequency ω stimulated by an exciter arrangement. The force f(t) can also include a possible extraneous time varying force factor g(t), such as a spurious force. This spurious force can, in some cases, be considered negligible or non-existent (e.g., value of 0) in terms of its influence on the force f(t). The force f(t) acts on at least one vibration-capable part (e.g., flow tube or other related device) of a measurement device of the vibration type. A response signal of the vibration-capable part can be measured. For example, a time dependent velocity v(t)=V sin(ωt+ψ)+h(t), with at least one sinusoidal component having a velocity amplitude V, the adjustable excitation frequency ω, and with a possible extraneous time varying velocity factor h(t) can be measured. The velocity constant V can be adjusted in response to changes in F, for a given measurement. The phase shift Ψ between the response signal and the force f of the signal component which oscillates with a frequency ω can be determined. The phase shift Ψ can be used as an input for a frequency controller so that the excitation frequency is automatically adjusted as a function of Ψ.
In this way the system, with respect to its vibration excitation, can be adapted to altered natural frequencies (i.e., eigenfrequencies) of the system.
In another exemplary embodiment configuration, the frequency controller is operated in the sense of a PID control.
In another exemplary embodiment, the PID controller is operated in the following sense:
wherein P, I And D are constants which can be determined empirically, in known fashion, and tuned from initial values based on feedback.
According to the exemplary process diagram as shown in
The vibration-capable part 2 can be a flow tube of a system subject to vibration force f(t). The response signal of the vibration-capable part 2 (e.g., its time-dependent velocity v(t)), can be measured in a sensor 3, the phase shift Ψ between the velocity v(t) and the force f(t) being determined in the sensor 3 or in any desired location.
The phase shift Ψ is used as the input of a frequency control, or controller 4. The controller 4 can include a processor for controlling ω in response to a frequency control signal u(t). The processor can, for example, implement an algorithm, which depending of the input Ψ, changes the frequency ω with which the exciter arrangement 1 excites the vibration-capable part 2 as described below.
In an exemplary embodiment, it is indicated that a mathematical function m(ψ) is used as the
The mathematical function can be mapping of real numbers into real numbers and can be chosen such that frequency control 4 converges to one of its natural frequencies ω0i of the system subject to the vibration force f(t).
One choice for the desired convergence for any natural frequency is, for example, the very simple function m(Ψ)=Ψ to the extent it is known that according to the theory of harmonic oscillation the driving force f(t) and the velocity v(t) are exactly in phase with the resonant frequency ω=ω0i. It follows therefrom that Ψ=0.
One simple model for the vibration v(t)={dot over (x)}(t) of the excited part of the measurement device is given by the equation of motion:
{umlaut over (x)}(t)+d*{dot over (x)}(t)+ω0i2*x(t)=b*F*sin(ωt)
The points in agreement with the physical convention indicate the respective degree of the derivative according to time, and d and b are model parameters.
A solution of the equation known for this purpose is:
This indicates that each natural frequency ω0i of the measurement device is a fixed point in the frequency controller 4 when the function m(ψ) has the property m(0)=0.
Because this relation between the phase shift ψ and the frequency ω is highly nonlinear, the convergence of the suggested frequency controller can be significantly improved if the function m(ψ) has suitable nonlinearities.
One exemplary nonlinear mapping is m(ψ)=tan(ψ).
With this function the relation between the input of the frequency controller tan (Ψ) and the controlled property, i.e., the frequency which has been held, is then linear over a wide range of operated frequencies, as is shown in
In an exemplary embodiment for the frequency controller 4, each input of the frequency controller m(ψ1) is computed from the sampled data of the force f(t) and the velocity v(t) in the time interval (t−Δt,t), Δt being much larger than the sampling time.
In an exemplary embodiment, m(ψ1) is the average of m(ψ) in the interval [t−Δt, t] and Δt is a multiple of the period 2π/ω of the sinusoidal vibrations generated by the exciter arrangement 1.
Another possible implementation for the frequency controller 4 is the already mentioned PID controller. It can be operated in the following sense:
wherein P, I and D will be understood by those skilled in the art to constitute constants which can be empirically determined, and then tuned from initial values using feedback.
Some of the parameters of the PID controller can also become zero, for example the I-portion and/or the D-portion, so that, for example, a P or purely PI controller can be used as the frequency controller 4.
In another exemplary embodiment, the frequency controller 4 can be either a neural network based on so-called fuzzy logic, or can be implemented in the manner of an actuator.
The exciter arrangement 1 can be a plunger coil. In this case the current can be controlled in the coil, and thus the force applied to the vibration-capable part 2 can be controlled.
The sensor 3 can also be a plunger coil and in this case an induced voltage can be analyzed.
For signal analysis and/or frequency control and/or signal generation of the exciter arrangement, a digital signal processor can also be used. Any of the components of the
The determination of the natural frequencies and adjustment to the latter can be a very prompt and very precise procedure. For example, the resolution and the noise level of the measurement signal for this process can be less than 0.0001 Hz.
Frequency instabilities and other nonlinear effects can be prevented because the sinusoidal feedback signal from the sensor which is referenced to the noise level is not used as a trigger signal.
The suggested frequency control with the “Ψ=0” condition for all values of the attenuation parameter D can ensure that the amplitude of the analyzed signal, i.e., the velocity amplitude
is maximum.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the present invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restricted. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description and all changes that come within the meaning and range and equivalence thereof are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 058 732 | Dec 2006 | DE | national |
10 2007 059 804 | Dec 2007 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5987999 | VanCleve et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
7403862 | Budmiger et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7441469 | Shelley et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7555397 | Roost et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20050011286 | Storm | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050228598 | Matt | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070095152 | Bitto et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070095153 | Rieder et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070137313 | Rieder et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070180929 | Rieder et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186686 | Drahm et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080229846 | Grotzer | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080281535 | Rensing et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090211373 | Matt | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 496 341 (A2) | Jan 2005 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080141787 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |