Patent Application
20220281771
The present invention relates to the incorporation of fluid bed combustion fly ash, and especially circulating fluid bed combustion fly ash into a granular ceramic mixture.
Fluid Bed Combustion (FBC) Power Plants Versus Pulverized Coal Combustion (PCC) Power Plants
Large quantities of fly ash are produced as a result of coal-fired electricity generation. This will continue into the foreseeable future. There is interest in how to utilise this fly ash waste material. Much fly ash is currently used in concrete as a pozzolan or cementitious material. Other uses include brick making and as a soil stabilisation material. However, much fly ash continues to go to landfill. This has obvious environmental, as well as economic, costs. There is therefore ongoing value and interest in developing products and processes that can use fly ash as a raw material. This minimises the amount of fly ash going to landfill and reduces the amounts of other virgin raw materials used.
The question of how to re-utilise the fly ash from power generation has become harder due to the introduction of fluidised bed combustion (FBC) technologies for thermal power generation and incineration. Fluidised bed combustion (FBC) plant designs are quite different to the pulverised coal combustion (PCC) plant designs that have been standard for power plants for many decades. The fly ash produced by FBC plants is different to PCC fly ash, and FBC fly ash is much harder than PCC fly ash to re-use in other applications such as ceramic production.
Fluidised bed combustors burn the coal in a heated fluidised bed of ash and/or sand at lower temperatures than PCC designs. Fluidised bed combustion (FBC) designs include “bubbling” fluidised beds as well as “circulating” fluidised bed designs. A bubbling fluid bed is also referred to as a “boiling fluid bed”. Circulating fluidised beds, known as CFBs, are most common. The various FBC designs can be further divided based on the pressures at which they run, either atmospheric or pressurised.
A circulating fluid bed (CFB) furnace operates by continuously recycling most of the hot ash (including any fine unburnt fuel) from the exhaust stream coming from the combustion zone back into the base of the fluidised bed combustion zone. A proportion of the finest fly ash is continuously removed from the exhaust and fresh fuel and additives are continuously added to the combustion zone. This system has many advantages including very high levels of carbon burn (due to the repeated passes of burning particles through the combustion zone) plus the fuel does not have to be pulverised before addition to the combustion zone. The extended time at elevated temperatures and the high levels of particle:particle interactions that ash particles experience in a CFB design gives opportunity for mineral phases that are not normally seen in PCC ashes to form.
Fluidised bed combustion (FBC) technology is becoming increasingly popular since plants using such technologies are less polluting. FBC plants emit much lower levels of nitrous oxides than conventional PCC plants, the removal of sulfur oxides is easier, and FBC plants can burn a wider range of fuels such as low-grade coal, and even fuels such as tyres and oil. Often these lower-grade fuels have a high sulfur content.
The solid/solid contact with hot particles in FBC plant designs gives very high heat exchange coefficients. This means that FBC plants can produce power efficiently at much lower temperatures: typically, between 800-900° C., compared to 1400-1700° C. in a PCC plant. Being able to operate efficiently at lower combustion temperatures has large advantages. In particular, the formation of nitrous oxides is lower in FBC plants, and NOx pollution is therefore reduced.
The removal of sulfur oxides is also simpler in FBC plants as compared to PCC plants. Typically, PCC plants burn higher quality, lower sulfate coals such as anthracite. Typically, PCC plants have wet scrubbers which treat the exhaust gases to chemically remove the sulfur oxides via a process called flue gas desulfurisation (FGD). This is a costly and intensive process.
In contrast to PCC plants, FBC plants typically reduce their sulfur oxide emissions by burning a mixture of fuel and limestone/chalk/dolomite. The limestone material (calcium carbonate) forms calcium oxide within the fluidised bed. This reacts with sulfur oxides from the combustion of sulfur compounds in the fuel to form calcium sulfate in-situ. This is possible as the temperatures are low enough in the fluidised bed for calcium sulfate minerals such as anhydrite to be stable and readily formed.
Such reactions would not be possible in a PCC plant due to the high temperatures used. Hence their need for a separate FGD system.
The addition of limestone material to the coal to allow sulfur oxides to react in-situ is a much simpler process than having to scrub the flue gases.
The Differences Between Fluid Bed Combustion (FBC) Fly Ash and Pulverised Coal Combustion (PCC) Fly Ash
The addition of significant amounts of limestone material to the boiler in a fluid bed combustion (FBC) plant means that the fluid bed combustion (FBC) fly ash typically comprises high levels of calcium species and sulfur species.
The levels of calcium species in FBC fly ash, usually reported as the equivalent calcium oxide level, are often higher than even high calcium oxide (Type C) fly ashes from PCC plants.
In addition, the levels of sulfur species in FBC fly ash, usually reported as the equivalent sulfur oxide level, are higher than the sulfur oxide level of PCC fly ash.
The ASTM-C618 standard is commonly used to define suitable fly ash quality for use as a pozzolan or cementitious product. The upper SO3 limit for materials to meet ASTM-C618 is 5 wt %. FBC fly ash typically comprises a much higher level of oxide of sulfur.
Physically, the fly ash from FBC designs is quite different to conventional PCC fly ash. The FBC fly ash has not been subjected to the very high temperatures encountered in the exhaust systems of conventional PCC plants. The fly ash produced in PCC plants has been suspended in the very hot effluent combustion gases. The temperatures experienced are high enough to melt particles. This means that the large majority of PCC fly ash particles are spherical and formed of glassy amorphous phases.
In contrast, fly ash from FBC plants, and especially CFB combustion plants, will not have been melted due to the lower temperatures of the FBC. As a result, the FBC fly ash particles have an irregular shape and do not contain glassy phases. Another difference is that the time for which the fly ash has been subjected to high temperatures is typically much longer in FBC plants, especially those plants where high levels of fly ash are recirculated, such as in a CFB combustion plant. This means, for example, that, whilst the iron in PCC fly ash is often present as magnetite and hematite, in FBC fly ash, and CFB combustion fly ash, it is mostly present as ferrite. This has major implications, for example, the ease of iron removal.
PCC and FBC fly ash are different chemically (e.g. typically having different levels of calcium species and sulfate species), different physically (e.g. typically having different morphologies, e.g. regular/glassy (PCC) compared to irregular/non-glassy (FBC)), and different mineralogically. FBC fly ash also has a smaller diameter than PCC fly ash (due to a self-grinding action) and has a lower residual carbon level compared to PCC fly ash.
The Problem of Incorporating Fluid Bed Combustion (FBC) Fly Ash, and Especially Circulating Fluid Bed (CFB) Combustion Fly Ash, in a Granular Ceramic Mixture
Most of the FBC fly ash is currently sent to landfill or used as a very low value soil stabilisation agent. It is less effective than PCC fly ash as a pozzolan. In addition, the high sulfate levels can cause problems. There is a growing need to find alternative uses for FBC fly ash. A potential high-value use is in ceramic articles such as ceramic floor tiles and porcelain floor tiles.
Fly ash can be used as a partial replacement for clays in ceramic articles. Fly ash can be combined with clay and other materials such as feldspar to form granular ceramic mixtures. The granular ceramic mixtures can then be formed into ceramic articles, such as ceramic tiles and especially porcelain floor tiles. Such ceramic articles can be made with significant levels of fly ash and this is known in the art.
The replacement of clay by fly ash is beneficial as supplies of suitable clay are becoming limited. Maximising the practical level of clay that can be replaced by fly ash is beneficial.
However, the fly ashes used in the art are mostly PCC fly ash. FBC, and particularly CFB combustion, technology is a relatively recent development, and was not in use when earlier ceramic art was developed. Hence issues relating specifically to the use of FBC fly ash in ceramics applications were not recognised, or even relevant, to most of this body of fly ash work. For example, the art describes fly ash as consisting of spheres of amorphous, glassy phases, which is a description of PCC fly ash and not FBC fly ash. It is clear that the art is referring to PCC fly ash.
The inventors have discovered that simply replacing PCC fly ash with FBC fly ash, and especially CFB combustion fly ash in ceramic compositions that also contain clays, feldspars and optionally other ingredients, can cause defects. Ceramic articles made using FBC fly ash have been observed to crack during the firing cycle. This is particularly problematic when making high quality, large ceramic items such as ceramic floor tiles, and especially porcelain floor tiles, where such defects are particularly unacceptable. The incorporation of fly ash into porcelain floor tiles, which need to have low water absorption and high flexural strength, is particularly challenging.
The inventors have also seen that this problem is exacerbated when the FBC fly ash is used at higher levels in ceramics applications.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is hypothesised that the high energy environment of a typical ceramics production process, and the high level of intense surface/surface contacts between clay and FBC fly ash particles results in the formation of higher levels of specific mineral phases which change the firing behaviour of the material. This in turn, leads to cracking of the ceramic articles.
The inventors have discovered that the problems associated with the incorporation of FBC fly ash, and especially CFB combustion fly ash, into granular ceramic mixtures can be overcome if the FBC fly ash is treated with an aqueous acid solution during the process of preparing the granular ceramic mixture. This allows FBC fly ash, and especially CFB combustion fly ash, to be incorporated into granular ceramic mixtures, that can then be formed into ceramic articles, such as ceramic floor tiles and porcelain floor tiles, without the problem of cracking.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is hypothesised that the acid treatment of FBC fly ash, and its subsequent incorporation into the granular ceramic mixture results in the formation of different mineral compositions and phases that have a different thermal behaviour and do not crack as readily.
The present invention provides a process for preparing a granular ceramic mixture, wherein the process comprises the steps of:
to form the granular ceramic mixture.
Process for Preparing a Granular Ceramic Mixture
The process for preparing a granular ceramic mixture comprises the steps of:
Treating the FBC fly ash with aqueous acid before contacting the treated fly ash with other ceramic materials such as clays has multiple advantages. For example, this minimises the amount of acid that is needed since in this application it is only the fly ash that actually needs acid treatment. The inventive process may require the removal of the soluble products of the chemical reaction between the acid and the fly ash.
In addition, contacting the fly ash only with acid makes filtering of the solid suspension easier since fly ash does not swell (and hence gel) in aqueous mixes as many clays do. The gelling and thickening associated with washing clays as well as fly ashes would make separation of the supernatant liquid slow and complex unless very dilute solutions are used.
Step (a) Obtaining the Acidic Fluid Bed Combustion Fly Ash Slurry
Fluid bed combustion fly ash is contacted with an acidic aqueous solution to obtain acidic fluid bed combustion fly ash slurry. Preferably, the pH of step (a) is in the range of from 2.0 to less than 7.0, preferably from 2.0 to 6.0, or from 2.0 to 5.0, or even from 2.3 to 4.0.
Step (b) Obtaining the Solid Acid Treated Fluid Bed Combustion Fly Ash
Excess acid is removed from the slurry obtained in step (a) to obtain solid acid treated fluid bed combustion fly ash.
Typically, step (b) comprises the steps of rinsing the slurry, and removing the supernatant from the solid content. This typical rinsing step can be repeated a number of times, for example two or more times, or even three or more times, or even four or more times.
Step (c) Forming the Granular Ceramic Mixture
During step (c), the following ingredients are contacted together:
The Granular Ceramic Mixture
The granular ceramic mixture comprises solid acid treated fluid bed combustion fly ash, clay, feldspar and optionally other ingredients.
Preferably, the granular ceramic mixture comprises:
Preferably, the granular ceramic mixture comprises:
Fluid Bed Combustion Fly Ash
Suitable fluid bed combustion fly ash can be atmospheric fluid bed combustion fly ash, pressurized fluid bed combustion fly ash, or a combination thereof.
Suitable fluid bed combustion fly ash can be circulating fluid bed combustion fly ash, bubbling fluid bed combustion fly ash, or a combination thereof.
A preferred fluid bed combustion fly ash is circulating fluid bed combustion fly ash.
Typically, the fluid bed combustion fly ash comprises greater than 4.0 wt % oxide of sulfur, or greater than 5.0 wt %, or greater than 6.0 wt %, or greater than 6.5 wt %, or greater than 7.0 wt %, or greater than 10 wt % oxide of sulfur.
Typically, the fluid bed combustion fly ash is derived from coal, typically fluid bed combustion coal fly ash.
Solid Acid Treated Fluid Bed Combustion Fly Ash
Typically, the solid acid treated the fluid bed combustion fly ash comprises greater than 4.0 wt % oxide of sulfur, or greater than 5.0 wt %, or greater than 6.0 wt %, or greater than 6.5 wt %, or greater than 7.0 wt %, or greater than 10 wt % oxide of sulfur.
Oxide of Sulfur
Analysis of the elemental composition of fly ash is most commonly done by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) techniques. This measures the levels of the heavier elements, such as iron, aluminium, silicon, sulfate and calcium. The convention is that these are then reported as the equivalent stoichiometric level of oxide. Sulfur is reported as SO3.
SO3 is often referred to as “sulfate” in the ceramic literature even though the term “sulfate” technically refers to the SO42− ion. Sometimes sulfur is reported as elemental sulfur but how the sulfur is reported makes no difference to the actual levels present. The present invention therefore uses the term “oxide of sulfur” to be more general. “Oxide of sulfur”, SO3 and “sulfate” are interchangeable terms when used herein.
The level of oxide of sulfur present in the fly ash can be determined using the following XRF method.
Suitable XRF equipment is the Epsilon 4 XRF analyser from Malvern Panalytical using sample disks prepared using an Aegon 2 automatic fusion equipment for sample disk preparation from Claisse. The ash sample is automatically dissolved in molten lithium borate flux and formed into a disk. This is then placed in the Epsilon 4 for analysis. Equipment should be operated as per manufacturer's instructions. When measuring for SO3, the Epsilon 4 should be set to a voltage of 4.5 kV, a current of 3000 μa, use helium as the medium, not use a filter, and have a measurement time of 450 s.
Clay
A suitable clay is a standard clay such as Ukrainian clay or illitic clay. A preferred clay is a combination of standard clay and high plasticity clay. The weight ratio of standard clay to high plasticity clay may in the range of from 2:1 to 5:1. A suitable clay is a high plasticity clay such as bentonite clay. Typically, a high plasticity clay has an Attterburg Plasticity Index of greater than 25.0. Typically, a standard clay has an Atterburg Plasticity Index of 25.0 or less. The amount of high plasticity clay can be selected to provide sufficient robustness and flowability for granular ceramic mixtures.
Feldspar
Suitable feldspars include sodium and/or potassium feldspars.
Optional Other Ingredients
Other optional ingredients include chemical additives and binders.
Acidic Aqueous Solution
The acidic aqueous solution can be an organic acidic aqueous solution, an inorganic acidic aqueous solution, or a combination thereof. The acidic aqueous solution is preferably a weak acid.
Suitable acidic aqueous solutions are selected from acetic acid (ethanoic acid), ascorbic acid ((2R)-2-[(1S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-3,4-dihydroxy-2H-furan-5-one), hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, oxalic acid (ethandioic acid), sulfuric acid, and any combination thereof.
Preferably, the acidic aqueous solution is an aqueous solution of acetic acid (ethanoic acid). A suitable source of acetic acid (ethanoic acid) is vinegar.
Typically, during step (a), the acidic aqueous solution has a molarity of from 0.2M to 3.0M, or from 0.4M to 2.0M, or even 0.5M to 1.5M.
Preferably, the pH of the acidic aqueous solution during step (a) is in the range of from 2.0 to less than 7.0, preferably from 2.0 to 6.0, or from 2.0 to 5.0, or even from 2.3 to 4.0.
Preferably, the acid is not sulfuric acid, and the acidic aqueous solution is not an aqueous solution of sulphuric acid.
Acid treated FBC fly ash was prepared by taking FBC fly ash and washing it in 10% (by volume) acetic acid (ethanoic acid) aqueous solution at the ratio of 50 g FBC fly ash to 500 ml of acetic acid (ethanoic acid) aqueous solution. The mixture was vigorously stirred at ambient for 60 mins.
After mixing, the mixture was allowed to settle, and the supernatant liquid poured off. The mix was then rinsed with fresh water by swirling, allowing the solid to settle and decanting the supernatant liquid. The wet ash was then dried at 120° C. for 1 hour to form dried acid treated FBC fly ash.
The dried acid treated FBC fly ash was then mixed with clay and feldspar and made into a ceramic article according to the process below.
100 g of acid treated fluid bed combustion fly ash was mixed with 50 g of illitic clay and 50 g sodium feldspar to form the granular ceramic mixture. The mixture was milled, sieved and wetted. 140 g of the above granular ceramic mixture was then uniaxially pressed in a rectangular mild steel mold (155×40 mm) to a pressure of 40 MPa which was held for 1.5 min (90 sec). The formed body was released from the mold and placed into a 110° C. oven to dry.
The dried body was fired in an electric kiln at a ramp rate of 2.5° C./min to 1160° C. The temperature was held at the top temperature for 30 min. The fired body was then allowed to cool down naturally (hence slowly) to room temperature.
No cracking was observed in the fired body.
The same procedure was followed as above, except that the fluid bed ash, whilst being identical in every other way to the acid treated fluid bed combustion fly ash apart from the acid treatment step, was not subjected to the acid washing step and was instead directly mixed with the other ingredients.
Cracking was observed in this fired body.
A comparative example of an identical composition to the FBC fly ash comparative example, made in exactly the same manner but made from PCC fly ash, did not show any cracking.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19191857.2 | Aug 2019 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2020/072869 | 8/14/2020 | WO |
