Patent Grant
8650727
The present invention relates to a cleaning sheet suitably used for trapping and removing dirt such as dust balls, strands of hair, and lint.
Applicant has previously proposed a technique for producing a bulky sheet, which involves reinforcing a nonwoven fabric made of entangled fibers with a net-form sheet and heat-shrinking the net-form sheet to form projections and depressions thereon (see Patent Literatures 1 and 2). Besides this type of bulky sheet, Applicant has also proposed another type of bulky sheet that includes a fiber aggregate made by water needling of a fibrous web, wherein the fiber aggregate is formed to have a multitude of projections and depressions (see Patent Literature 3). The projections and depressions in this bulky sheet are formed by rearrangement of the constituent fibers of the fiber aggregate due to the water needling process applied thereto, which renders a zigzag form to the fiber aggregate in its thickness direction.
The sheet produced according to the method of Patent Literature 1 or 2 has an appropriate amount and extent of projections and depressions and is soft and pleasant to the touch. However, since the projections are made by heat-shrinking of fibers, the fiber density in the projections tends to become high. Thus, there still is room for improving the capability of the constituent fibers of the projections to trap dirt such as dust balls.
Meanwhile, the sheet produced according to the method of Patent Literature 3 is capable of trapping and retaining dust among the constituent fibers and is also capable of trapping and retaining relatively-large dirt with its projections and depressions, such as bread crumbs that cannot be trapped among the constituent fibers. However, when high-speed production is applied to this type of sheet to increase productivity, the sheet receives a high tension while being carried, and this may reduce the bulkiness of the projections and depressions.
Besides the above-described techniques for producing bulky sheets, Applicant has also proposed an through-air, hot-air processing technique as a method for restoring the bulkiness of a continuous sheet having been wound into a roll shape and whose bulkiness has thus been reduced (see Patent Literature 4). Patent Literature 4, however, describes nothing about the possibility of applying this hot-air processing technique to the production of sheets having the structure as disclosed in Patent Literatures 1 to 3.
Patent Literature 1: JP-A-5-25763
Patent Literature 2: JP-A-5-192285
Patent Literature 3: U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,333 B2
Patent Literature 4: U.S. Pat. No. 7,131,171 B2
An aspect of the present invention relates to a process for producing a cleaning sheet that can overcome the drawbacks of the conventional techniques described above.
The present invention provides a process for producing a cleaning sheet, comprising:
superposing a fibrous web containing fibers comprising polyethylene terephthalate on one side or both sides of a net-form sheet;
water needling the fibrous web to entangle the fibers of the fibrous web with each other, and also to entangle the fibers of the fibrous web with the net-form sheet thereby forming a laminate;
blowing hot air having a temperature above the glass transition temperature (Tg (° C.)) of the polyethylene terephthalate and below “Tg (° C.)+70° C.” to the laminate by through-air technique.
The present invention can produce a cleaning sheet that is less prone to lose its bulkiness even in high-speed production and that has excellent capabilities in trapping dirt such as dust balls.
The present invention will be described below according to preferred embodiments thereof with reference to the drawings. First, we will describe a preferred embodiment of a cleaning sheet produced according to a production process of the present invention. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Preferably, both sides of the cleaning sheet 10 have similar properties/capabilities, and the shapes and intervals of the projections 2 on the second side 10b are preferably substantially the same as those of the first side 10a. Particularly, the total area of the projections 2 on the second side 10b is preferably 20 to 100%, more preferably 35 to 100%, with respect to the total area of the projections 2 on the first side 10a. Preferably, the projections 2 on the first side of the cleaning sheet 10 are in an inside-outside relationship with the depressions 3 in the second side of the sheet 10, and the projection 2 preferably has the inverted shape of the depression 3.
The projections 2 and the depressions 3 consist of the fiber aggregate 1 and are formed by merely entangling the constituent fibers of the fiber aggregate 1. Thus, the projections 2 and the depressions 3 are pleasant to the touch and have excellent capabilities of trapping and retaining dirt such as strands of hair and small particles of dust, in contract to projections formed by fusion-bonding caused by partially heating and pressurizing fibers consisting of thermoplastic resin through embossing etc.
The projections 2 and the depressions 3 of the cleaning sheet 10 are formed by rearranging and re-entangling the constituent fibers of the fiber aggregate 1 which is caused by the water needling process applied thereto; thus, the projections 2 and the depressions 3 can retain their shapes by themselves. Accordingly, the projections 2 and the depressions 3 are less prone to collapse due to load. Owing to the existence of the projections 2 and depressions 3, the apparent thickness of the cleaning sheet 10 becomes larger than the thickness of the fiber aggregate 1 before being provided with the projections 2 and depressions 3. The cleaning sheet 10, with its projections 2 and depressions 3 having good shape-retainability, has excellent properties of cleaning grooves and uneven surfaces as well as excellent capabilities to trap and retain dirt such as bread crumbs.
When the shape-retainability of the projection 2 is evaluated as the difference between the sheet's apparent thickness (initial thickness; thickness under a load of 15 gf/25 cm2 [=59 Pa]) and the apparent thickness under load during cleaning (loaded thickness; thickness under a load of 96 gf/25 cm2 [=376 Pa]), it is preferable that the projections 2 and depressions 3 retain their shapes even when loaded and that the amount of change in thickness is 1 mm or less, more preferably 0.8 mm or less.
In the present invention, the expression “form by rearranging and re-entangling fibers” means that a fiber aggregate, which has once been weakly entangled together through water needling, is again subjected to water needling, this time on a patterning member having a multitude of projecting-and-depressed sections or a multitude of openings, such that the fibers are rearranged along the projecting-and-depressed sections and then entangled again.
As illustrated in
Preferably, there are, on average, 50 to 850, more preferably 100 to 600, of projections 2 per a 10-by-10-centimeter area on one side of the cleaning sheet 10 at any location of that side. Keeping the number of projections 2 within the above-described range allows the projections 2 and depressions 3 to be arranged in good balance, thus achieving even better capabilities of trapping and retaining small particles of dirt and also even better capabilities of trapping and retaining relatively-large dirt such as bread crumbs.
The apparent specific volume of the cleaning sheet 10 is preferably 23 to 100 cm3/g, more preferably 25 to 90 cm3/g, and even more preferably 30 to 80 cm3/g. An apparent specific volume of 23 cm3/g or above allows the sheet to sufficiently conform to grooves and uneven surfaces and trap dirt. Further, an apparent specific volume of 100 cm3/g or less makes the inter-fiber distance appropriate, thus allowing the sheet to retain dirt securely. The value of the apparent specific volume is defined as a quotient found by dividing the value of the apparent thickness (described later) by the basis weight of the fiber aggregate (for a sheet entangled and integrated with a net-form sheet, the basis weight excluding the net-form sheet).
Preferably, the cleaning sheet 10 has an apparent specific volume under load during cleaning of 18 cm2/g or above, and more preferably 20 cm2/g or above, with a maximum of 100 cm2/g.
As illustrated in
The elongation of the cleaning sheet 10 in its machine direction (MD) is preferably 5% or less, and more preferably 4% or less, under the condition that a load of 5 N is applied to a 30-mm-wide sample. Such an elongation is preferable in terms of preventing deformation of the projections 2 and depressions 3 caused by pulling and stretching of the cleaning sheet 10 during production or during use of the cleaning sheet 10, to thus prevent reduction in bulkiness of the cleaning sheet 10.
The “elongation” in the machine direction is measured as follows. A sample 30-mm wide in a direction orthogonal to the machine direction is cut out from the cleaning sheet 10. The sample is then held in a tensile tester at a chuck-to-chuck distance of 100 mm, and the sample is pulled in the machine direction at a speed of 300 mm/min. The “elongation” is found by dividing the sample's elongation amount at a tensile load of 5 N by the initial sample length (100 mm) and multiplying the quotient by 100.
Next, the fiber aggregate 1 and the net-form sheet 4 constituting the cleaning sheet 10 will be described. The fiber aggregate 1 is a nonwoven-like article formed by entangling the constituent fibers of a fibrous web together by applying water needling thereto. The fiber aggregate 1 is formed by merely entangling its constituent fibers, and therefore, the degree of freedom of the constituent fibers is high compared to a web made by simply fusing or bonding the constituent fibers. Thus, the fiber aggregate 1 has excellent capabilities to trap and retain dirt, such as strands of hair and small particles of dust, with its constituent fibers, and also has a pleasant feel to the touch.
In the present embodiment, the fibers that are used to constitute the fiber aggregate 1 contain polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The use of fibers containing PET is advantageous in that the cleaning sheet 10 becomes extremely bulky by being subjected to hot-air processing during the production process described further below. Examples of fibers containing PET include: a single fiber consisting only of PET; a single fiber consisting of a blend of PET and another thermoplastic resin; and a conjugate fiber containing PET. Examples of usable conjugate fibers include: core/sheath conjugate fibers employing PET as, for example, the core component; and side-by-side conjugate fibers in which PET constitutes one of the components. It is preferable to use a single fiber consisting only of PET in order to effectively make the cleaning sheet 10 bulky through the hot-air processing.
It is preferable to use PET having a weight-average molecular weight of 5,000 to 100,000, more preferably 8,000 to 50,000, from the standpoint of rendering the cleaning sheet 10 bulky through hot-air processing.
The fiber aggregate 1 may consist only of the fibers containing PET, or may contain other fibers in addition to the PET-containing fibers. Examples usable as other fibers are described, for example, on column 4, lines 3 to 10 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,397 A, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In cases where the fiber aggregate 1 contains other fibers, the amount of fibers containing PET is preferably 40% by weight or more, more preferably 50% by weight or more, with respect to the weight of the fiber aggregate 1, whereas the amount of the other fibers is preferably less than 60% by weight, more preferably less than 50% by weight, with respect to the weight of the fiber aggregate 1. Preferably, the fiber aggregate 1 consists only of fibers containing PET in order to effectively make the cleaning sheet 10 bulky through the hot-air processing.
The thickness of the fiber containing PET is not particularly critical in terms of the bulkiness of the cleaning sheet 10 rendered by the hot-air processing. From the standpoint of the capabilities to trap and retain strands of hair and dirt, the thickness of the fiber containing PET is preferably 0.05 to 100 dtex, more preferably 0.5 to 20 dtex.
The basis weight of the fiber aggregate 1 and the fiber length of its constituent fibers are determined with comprehensive consideration given to processability, cost, etc. The basis weight of the fiber aggregate 1 is preferably 30 to 100 g/m2, more preferably 40 to 70 g/m2. The fiber length of the constituent fiber is preferably 20 to 100 mm, more preferably 30 to 65 mm, in terms of preventing holes from being formed in the cleaning sheet 10 as well as rendering and sustaining sufficient bulkiness.
The cleaning sheet 10 has a net-form sheet 4 disposed in the fiber aggregate 1, as described above. As illustrated in
The basis weight of the cleaning sheet 10 is preferably 30 to 110 g/m2, more preferably 38 to 80 g/m2, and even more preferably 45 to 80 g/m2, in terms of providing a suitable thickness to the sheet and improving processability. The breaking strength for a 30-mm-wide sample is preferably 5 N or above, more preferably 7 N or above, from the standpoint of providing a sheet strong enough to endure use. The breaking strength need only be within the above-described range in at least one direction of the cleaning sheet 10; preferably, the breaking strength is within the above-described range in the width direction (cross direction; CD) which is most difficult to make strong. The maximum breaking strength is around 20 N in terms of practical use.
The breaking strength is measured as follows. A sample 30-mm wide in a direction orthogonal to the sheet's fiber-orientation direction is cut out. The sample is then held in a tensile tester at a chuck-to-chuck distance of 100 mm, and the sample is pulled in the direction orthogonal to the fiber-orientation direction at a speed of 300 mm/min. The load value at which the sheet starts to tear (the first peak value appearing in the continuous curve obtained through this measurement) is taken as the “breaking strength”.
Next, a preferred process for producing the above-described cleaning sheet will be described with reference to
The projection-and-depression applying section 20C includes: a patterning member 27 consisting of an endless belt; and second water-jet nozzles 28. The patterning member 27 rotates in the direction illustrated by the arrows in
In the device 20 for producing the cleaning sheet 10 structured as above, first, the carding machines 21A and 21B in the superposing section 20A respectively pay out the fibrous webs 1a and 1b continuously via the paying-out rolls 22, 22. Preferably, at least one of the fibrous webs 1a and 1b contains 40% by weight or more of fibers containing polyethylene terephthalate. A roll 23 of net-form sheet 4 is disposed between the carding machines 21A and 21B, and the paying-out roll 24 for the roll 23 pays out the net-form sheet 4. At the positions of the paying-out rolls 22, 22, the fibrous webs 1a and 1b are superposed on the respective sides of the net-form sheet 4, to form a superposed element 5. Preferably, at least one of the fibrous webs 1a and 1b contains 40% by weight or more of fibers containing PET. More preferably, both the fibrous webs 1a and 1b contain 40% by weight or more of fibers containing PET, and even more preferably, both the fibrous webs 1a and 1b consist of 100% of fibers containing PET.
In the entangling section 20B, the superposed element 5 transported and carried on the web-supporting belt 25 is subjected to entangling processing by high-pressure jet streams of water emitted from the first water-jet nozzles 26. As a result, the constituent fibers of the fibrous webs 1a and 1b in the superposed element 5 are entangled together to form a fiber aggregate, and also, the constituent fibers and the net-form sheet 4 are entangled together, to form a laminate 6 in which the fibrous webs and the net-form sheet have been integrated together. Preferably, the fibers constituting the fiber aggregate in the laminate 6 have a low degree of entanglement. The degree of entanglement, as expressed by “entanglement coefficient”, is preferably 0.05 to 2 N·m/g, more preferably 0.2 to 1.2 N·m/g. Controlling the degree of entanglement of the fibers constituting the fiber aggregate in the laminate to fall within the above-described range allows production of a cleaning sheet having clear projecting-and-depressed shapes, without giving rise to any holes, at the time of applying projections and depressions in the projection-and-depression applying section 20C described below.
The “entanglement coefficient” is a measure indicating the degree of entanglement among constituent fibers, and is represented by the initial gradient of the stress-strain curve measured in a direction perpendicular to the fiber orientation direction of the fiber aggregate 1 of the integrated laminate 6; the smaller the coefficient, the weaker the entanglement among the fibers. Here, the “fiber orientation” is in the direction in which the maximum point-load value in a tensile-strength test becomes the largest; the “stress” is the quotient found by dividing the tensile load by the “clamping width” (width of the specimen in the tensile-strength test) and by the basis weight of the fiber aggregate 1; and the “strain” refers to the elongation amount. A concrete example for measuring the entanglement coefficient is described on column 12, lines 32 to 50 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,333 B2, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Then, in the projection-and-depression applying section 20C, the laminate 6 is transported onto the patterning member 27 and carried thereby. While being carried, the laminate 6 is partially pressurized by high-pressure jet streams of water emitted from the second water-jet nozzles 28. At this time, portions of the laminate 6 that are located on the depressed sections of the patterning member 27 are pressurized, and the pressurized portions thus protrude into the depressed sections. As a result, the pressurized portions are formed into depressions 3 corresponding to the depressed sections. On the other hand, portions of the laminate 6 that are located on the projecting sections of the patterning member 27 are not made to protrude, and thus become the projections 2. In this way, a multitude of projections 2, 2—as well as the depressions 3 between the projections 2, 2—are formed on the laminate 6, thus applying projecting-and-depressed shapes over the entire laminate 6. The features, such as the shape, of the projections 2 are determined depending on such factors as the type of the patterning member 27 and the entangling energy applied to the fiber aggregate by the high-pressure jet streams of water in the entangling section 20B and the projection-and-depression applying section 20C. The entangling energy, in turn, can be controlled according to such conditions as the nozzle shape of the water-jet nozzles, the nozzle pitch, water pressure, number of stages (pieces) of nozzles, and line speed.
Assuming that “Em” represents the energy applied at the time of water needling the fibrous webs to form the fiber aggregate 1 and “Ef” represents the energy applied at the time of making some portions of the fiber aggregate 1 protrude on the patterning member 27, it is preferable that, in the present production process, the energy applied satisfies the condition(s) 200 (kJ/kg)<Em+Ef<1250 (kJ/kg), more preferably 400 (kJ/kg)<Em+Ef<1000 (kJ/kg), and/or, Em/10<Ef<2Em/3, more preferably Em/4<Ef<3Em/5 from the standpoint of providing sufficient bulkiness, preventing fibers from falling off and holes from opening during projection-and-depression formation, and developing a sufficient sheet strength. “Em” and “Ef” are each calculated from the following equation:
wherein:
The laminate 6 provided with the projecting-and-depressed shapes is then carried to a hot-air processing device 30 illustrated in
The device 30 illustrated in
A first blower 34 is disposed above and in opposition to the conveyer belt 32. The first blower 34 blows, toward the conveyer belt 32, hot air heated to a predetermined temperature. A first suction box 35 is disposed in opposition to the first blower 34 across the conveyer belt 32, for suction of the hot air blown from the first blower 34. The first blower 34 and the first suction box 35 constitute the heating zone H. The hot air sucked in by the first suction box 35 is fed into the first blower 34 through a duct (not shown). In other words, the hot air circulates between the first blower 34 and the first suction box 35.
A second blower 36 is disposed in opposition to the conveyer belt 32 and immediately downstream of the first blower 34 relative to the rotating direction of the conveyer belt 32. The second blower 36 blows, toward the conveyer belt 32, cool air at a predetermined temperature. A second suction box 37 is disposed in opposition to the second blower 36 across the conveyer belt 32, for suction of the cool air blown from the second blower 36. The second blower 36 and the second suction box 37 constitute the cooling zone C. The cool air sucked by the second suction box 37 is discharged outside the device through a duct (not shown). In other words, in contrast to the hot air in the heating zone H, the cool air is not circulated between the second blower 36 and the second suction box 37. This is done in order to prevent heating of the cool air due to circulation and increase the efficiency for cooling the laminate 6.
Partitioning plates 38, 38 are disposed between the first blower 34 and the second blower 36 and between the first suction box 35 and the second suction box 37, respectively. The partitioning plates 38 prevent the hot air and the cool air from mixing together.
In the embodiment of
First, the laminate 6 is carried along with the conveyer belt 32, and the carried laminate 6 is sent into the heating zone H, where the first blower 34 blows, toward the conveyer belt 32, hot air heated to a predetermined temperature. In the heating zone H, the hot air is blown to the laminate 6 by through-air technique. That is, the hot air is blown to the laminate 6 and then passes through the laminate 6. The present Inventors have found through investigation that, surprisingly, this hot-air blowing operation serves to increase the bulkiness of the laminate 6, which is in a bulkiness-reduced state, and to restore its bulkiness back to the same degree as before roll-up. Particularly, it was also found that the presence of the net-form sheet 4 in the laminate 6 significantly heightens the degree of increase in bulkiness.
The hot air to be blown to the laminate 6 should be adjusted to a temperature above the glass transition temperature (Tg (° C.)) of PET in the PET-containing fibers of the laminate and below “Tg (° C.)+70° C.”. In cases where the temperature of the hot air is equal to or below Tg (° C.), the effect of blowing the hot air will not be achieved sufficiently and the bulkiness of the laminate 6 will not be restored. On the other hand, blowing hot air at temperatures equal to or above “Tg (° C.)+70° C.” will cause the fibers to melt, and thus in this case also, the bulkiness of the laminate 6 will not be restored. From the standpoint of restoring the bulkiness of the laminate 6 even more effectively, the temperature of the hot air is preferable equal to or above 80° C. and equal to or below 140° C., and more preferably equal to or above 85° C. and equal to or below 135° C. It is also preferable that the temperature of the hot air to be blown is below the melting point of the resin constituting the net-form sheet 4.
The above-described glass transition temperature Tg is measured using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The measurement using the DSC is conducted in a nitrogen atmosphere at a temperature-increase rate of 10° C./min. “Tg” is defined as the temperature where a step is observed on the lower-temperature side than the temperature of the endothermic peak in the endothermic curve obtained during the first temperature increase.
The time for which the hot air is blowen is not a critical element in terms of bulkiness restoring, and a short period of time will be sufficient. More specifically, the bulkiness of the laminate 6 will be restored in an extremely short hot-air-blowing time as short as preferably 0.05 to 3 seconds, more preferably 0.05 to 1 second, and even more preferably 0.05 to 0.5 seconds. This contributes to an improvement in production efficiency and downsizing of the device 30. It is thought that through-air technique contributes greatly to the short blowing time. Constant-temperature drying ovens and driers may be considered as other usable means for applying heat to the laminate 6 besides blowing hot air by through-air technique, but these blowing methods cannot achieve bulkiness restoration in such a short time.
The speed at which to blow the hot air is preferably 0.5 to 10 msec, more preferably 1 to 5 m/sec, in terms of hot-air cost and downsizing of the device, although the speed depends on the temperature of the hot air, the basis weight of the laminate 6, and the carrying speed.
The above-described operation restores the bulkiness of the laminate 6 to around 1.2 to 3 times the bulkiness before blowing hot air (i.e., the bulkiness before blowing hot air becomes 1/1.2 to ⅓ of the bulkiness after blowing hot air), thus achieving the intended cleaning sheet. The thickness of the laminate 6 is restored to around 50 to 100% of the thickness before being wound around a roll.
The present Inventors have found through investigation that rolling-up the cleaning sheet 10, whose bulkiness has been restored by blowing hot air, may again reduce the restored bulkiness of the cleaning sheet 10. The Inventors also found that, to prevent this, it is effective to blow cool air onto the cleaning sheet 10 by through-air technique immediately after the bulkiness of the cleaning sheet 10 has been restored by blowing hot air. Blowing cool air cools the bulky cleaning sheet 10 so that its bulkiness is sustained, and this prevents the bulkiness from being reduced even when the sheet is wound into a roll shape. Accordingly, in the device 30 illustrated in
In the cooling zone C, cool air at a predetermined temperature is blown from the second blower 36 toward the conveyer belt 32. The cool air is blown by through-air technique onto the cleaning sheet 10 in the cooling zone C. In other words, in the cooling zone C, the cool air is blown onto the cleaning sheet 10 and then passes through the cleaning sheet 10.
A sufficient cooling effect can be achieved at a cool-air temperature of 50° C. or below, more preferably 30° C. or below, although this may depend on the type of fiber constituting the nonwoven fabric. There is no particular lower limit to the cool-air temperature, but room temperature around 20 to 25° C. is suitable in terms of energy cost and simplification of the device 30.
The speed at which to blow the cool air is preferably 1 to 10 msec, more preferably 1 to 5 m/sec, and even more preferably 1 to 3 msec, from the standpoint of sufficiently cooling the cleaning sheet 10 which is hot due to blowing of hot air. A wind speed within the above-described range will achieve a sufficient cooling effect. It is also possible to reduce the possibility of inhibiting stable carrying of the cleaning sheet 10 due to high wind speed.
The present Inventors have found through investigation that only a short amount of time is required for blowing the cool air, as with the amount of time for which the hot air is blown. More specifically, the cleaning sheet 10 will be sufficiently cooled in an extremely short cool-air-blowing time as short as 0.01 second or longer, more preferably 0.02 to 1 second, and even more preferably 0.05 to 0.5 seconds. It is thought that through-air technique contributes greatly to the short blowing time.
In cases where the cleaning sheet 10 contains heat-shrinkable fibers, the sheet 10 may shrink due to the hot air blown thereon in the heating zone H. Shrinking is prone to occur particularly in the width direction of the sheet 10, i.e., in the direction orthogonal to the carrying direction of the sheet 10. To prevent this, it is preferable to suppress the sheet from shrinking in its width direction such that the width of the cleaning sheet 10 after blowing cool air (i.e., the width of the cleaning sheet 10 after leaving the cooling zone C) is 95% or above, more preferably 97% or above, with respect to the width of the laminate 6 before blowing hot air thereon (i.e., the width of the laminate 6 before entering the heating zone H). One way to suppress shrinking is to grip both sides of the laminate 6 along the carrying direction with predetermined gripping means so that the width of the laminate 6 will not change, and send the laminate 6 into the heating zone H and the cooling zone C in this gripped state. Another very simple way may be to adjust the wind speed of the hot air and cool air so as to press the laminate 6 against the conveyer belt 32 at the time of blowing the hot air and cool air onto the laminate 6 respectively in the heating zone H and the cooling zone C, and carry the laminate 6 in such a state that its width does not change. The range of the wind speed of the hot air and cool air is as described above; the wind speed may be determined within the above-described range depending on the basis weight of the laminate 6 and the carrying speed.
By undergoing the above operations, the cleaning sheet 10 becomes very bulky. The bulky cleaning sheet 10 then undergoes various subsequent processing steps. Examples of such processing steps include a step of cutting the cleaning sheet 10 into a multitude of individual sheets, a step of placing several pieces of the cut-up cleaning sheets 10 on top of one another and putting them in a packing bag, and so forth. The cleaning sheets 10 obtained may be used as dry cleaning sheets, or as wet cleaning sheets impregnated with various cleaning agents.
The present invention has been described in detail above according to a preferred embodiment thereof. The present invention, however, is not to be limited thereto. For example, in the above production process, fibrous webs 1a and 1b were disposed on respective sides of the net-form sheet 4; instead a fibrous web may be disposed only on one side of the net-form sheet 4. In that case, the fibrous web preferably contains 40% by weight or more of fibers containing polyethylene terephthalate.
Further, in the foregoing embodiment, the hot-air processing using the device 30 was followed by cool-air processing; however, the cool-air processing is not always necessary.
The present invention will be described in further detail below according to Examples thereof. The scope of the present invention, however, is not to be limited to these Examples. Unless otherwise stated, “%” and “parts” refer respectively to “% by weight” and “part by weight”.
PET fiber (1.45 dtex; 38 mm; Tg: 78° C.; weight-average molecular weight: 20,000) was employed as the starting material and was made into a fibrous web having a basis weight of 24 g/m2 by an ordinary carding method. A polypropylene grid-shaped net (inter-fiber distance: 8 mm; thread diameter: 300 μm) was used as the net-form sheet. The above-described fibrous webs were superposed on respective sides of the net-form sheet. Then, the fibrous webs and the net-form sheet were entangled and integrated together by jet streams of water emitted from the plurality of nozzles illustrated in
The thus-obtained laminate was once wound into a roll. Then, the laminate was unwound from the roll and carried to the device 30 illustrated in
Respective cleaning sheets were prepared in the same way as in Example 1, except that the respective conditions shown in Table 1 were employed for the hot-air processing.
A cleaning sheet was prepared in the same way as in Example 1, except that a fibrous web having a basis weight of 27 g/m2 was used, and no hot-air processing was conducted.
Evaluation:
For each cleaning sheet prepared according to the Examples and Comparative Examples, the “hair trapping rate” and “thickness” were measured according to the methods described below, and also, the “clarity of projecting-and-depressed shapes in the sheet's cross-section in its thickness direction”, the “sheet processability”, and the “suitability as a product” were evaluated according to the following criteria. The results are shown in Table 1.
Hair Trapping Rate:
Each cleaning sheet was attached to the head of a “Quickie Wiper” (registered trademark), a cleaning tool manufactured by Kao Corporation. The trapping rate for when the side of the cleaning sheet onto which the jet streams of water were blown during production (referred to hereinafter as “back side”) was used as the cleaning surface and also the trapping rate for when the side opposite from the side onto which the jet streams of water were blown (referred to hereinafter as “front side”) were measured. A 30-by-60-centimeter wooden floor (“Woody Tile MT613T”; product of Matsushita Electric Works Co., Ltd.) was used as a “normal wooden-floor surface”. Ten pieces of hair, each approximately 10 cm long, were scattered on this “normal surface”. The cleaning sheet was then placed thereon and moved back-and-forth 5 times at a given stroke (60 cm), and the number of pieces of hair trapped on the cleaning sheet was counted. This operation was repeated 3 times consecutively, and the number of pieces of trapped hair, among the 30 pieces of scattered hair, was counted. The quotient found by dividing the number of pieces of trapped hair by 30 was multiplied by 100, to find the “hair trapping rate (%)”. In addition, a 30-by-60-centimeter smooth-finish decorative board was used as a low-friction “smooth surface”; 10 pieces of hair, each approximately 10 cm long, were scattered on this “smooth surface”; the cleaning sheet was then placed thereon and moved back-and-forth twice at a given stroke (60 cm); the number of pieces of hair trapped on the cleaning sheet was counted; and thereafter, the same steps as those for the “normal surface” were performed, to find the “trapping rate”.
Sheet Thickness:
The thicknesses at a load of 300 Pa and 700 Pa were measured, respectively.
Clarity of Projecting-and-Depressed Shapes in Sheet's Cross-Section in Thickness Direction:
The sheet's cross-section in its thickness direction was observed with a microscope, to visually evaluate the clarity of the projecting-and-depressed shapes according to the following criteria:
A: Projecting-and-depressed shapes are clear.
C: Some of the projecting-and-depressed shapes are clear.
F: Projecting-and-depressed shapes are unclear, or absolutely no projecting-and-depressed shape is visible.
Sheet Processability:
The following criteria were used to evaluate whether or not the sheet adapted to high-speed processing:
A: Neither shrinkage in the sheet's width direction nor fall-off of fibers from the sheet's surface was observed.
B: Slight shrinkage in the sheet's width direction and slight fall-off of fibers from the sheet's surface were observed.
C: Either the sheet shrank to an extent that affected cutting, or fall-off of fibers from the sheet's surface was clearly observed.
F: The sheet shrank significantly in the width direction, and so many fibers fell off from the sheet's surface that they could be visually observed.
Sheet's Suitability as Product:
A: Stable shape and good texture.
C: The shape was unstable, and the sheet was in such a state that fibers could easily fall off from the sheet's surface.
F: Fall-off of fibers from the sheet's surface was observed, and some areas exhibited extremely different texture from other areas.
The results of Table 1 clearly show that the cleaning sheets of the present Examples are superior to the cleaning sheets of the Comparative Examples in terms of bulkiness and hair trapping capabilities.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-137435 | May 2008 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2009/059536 | 5/25/2009 | WO | 00 | 12/30/2010 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009/145148 | 12/3/2009 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5143779 | Newkirk et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5334446 | Quantrille et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5368925 | Hosokawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5525397 | Shizuno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5789328 | Kurihara et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 6063717 | Ishiyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6936333 | Shizuno et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7131171 | Miyamoto et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7507463 | Noda et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 20030008108 | Shizuno et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20040010895 | Vonfeldt et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111848 | Miyamoto et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20070298671 | Noda et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1365406 | Aug 2002 | CN |
| 1497086 | May 2004 | CN |
| 1 403 413 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 5-25763 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 5-192285 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| 2001-336052 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2003-230519 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2004-137655 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2005-15938 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2007-312931 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| WO 0171081 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report, dated Aug. 11, 2009, issued in PCT/JP2009/059536. |
| English translation of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Form PCT/IB/338 and 373) and of Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Form PCT/ISA/237) mailed Jan. 20, 2011 in International Application No. PCT/JP2009/059536. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200980118069.1, dated Jun. 26, 2012. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 12, 2011, for European Application No. 09754656.8. |
| Notice of Rejection for corresponding Japanese Patent Appiication No. 2009-125404, dated Jan. 8, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110126388 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
