Process for producing hot forged steel having excellent fatigue strength, yield strength, and machinability

TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a production process for a steel for machine structural use including use for automobiles by hot forging. More specifically, the present invention relates to a production process for a hot forged steel that has excellent tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability simultaneously by hot forging a steel product having a specific chemical composition to form a specified metallographic structure and applying aging treatment thereafter.
BACKGROUND ART
Non-thermal refined steels have been widely used for structural machine parts such as automobile parts from the standpoint of elimination of steps and reduction of production cost.
These non-thermal refined steels have been developed mainly for their high tensile strength (or hardness), yield strength and toughness. In this regard, as disclosed in Laid-Open Japanese Patent Application No. Sho 62-205245, for example, non-thermal refined steels have been proposed that utilize V, a typical element for precipitation strengthening. In application of such non-thermal refined steels having high strength and toughness as machine structural steel, however, the real problems are the fatigue strength and machinability.
Fatigue strength is generally understood to depend on the tensile strength and increases as the tensile strength increases. However, enhancement of tensile strength deteriorates the machinability extremely: with a tensile strength exceeding 120 kgf/mm.sup.2, production with normal efficiency will be impossible. There has thus been eager demand to develop a non-thermal refined steel by improving fatigue strength without sacrificing the machinability.
For this purpose, it is an effective means to improve durability ratio, that is the ratio of the fatigue strength to the tensile strength. In this connection, a process to reduce the high carbon isle-like martensite and the retained austenite in the structure is proposed, for example in Japanese Laid-Open Patent Application No. Hei 4-176842, by transforming the metallographic structure into a structure mainly composed of bainite.
However, despite such efforts and other development trials the durability ratio has been improved to 0.55 at most and the machinability has been improved only twice or so compared with the conventional type bainite non-thermal refined steels having extremely poor machinability.
Previously, the present inventors studied several kinds of hot forging products of metallographic structures in which a proper amount of bainite structure is mixed with ferrite structure, regarding their fatigue strength and machinability and invented a non-thermal refined ferrite-bainite type steel, usable as hot forged, having improved tensile strength and fatigue strength while keeping the machinability acceptable to the conventional machining step. This study was conducted from the three standpoints of (1) utilizing the complex precipitates as precipitation nuclei of ferrite, (2) lowering of low C and N, and (3) precipitating V carbide into a two-phase structure of ferrite+bainite. However, the steel having a bainite structure as transformed has problems of significantly lowered yield strength and yield ratio although the tensile strength and fatigue strength are improved. Due to these problems, the application, in particular, to automobile engine parts that are subjected to large load irregularity has been difficult.
The present invention is to provide a production process for a hot forged steel having high tensile strength, fatigue strength and good machinability simultaneously, which has been difficult to realize by conventional hot forging steels.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
The yield strength equals the stress for starting plastic deformation, and is decided in the case of a two-phase structure of hard phase+soft phase, for example, by the yield strength of the soft phase. Thus, in the case of two-phase structure of ferrite+bainite, the yield strength of the soft ferrite phase, governs. Since the ferrite phase finishes the transformation at a relatively high temperature, the ferrite phase contains smaller amounts of solid-solute C and N than the bainite phase, which is a lower temperature transformation phase, and an aging treatment will not increase the yield strength.
On the other hand, in a material of ferrite+bainite structure where V is contained in some larger amount, a large amount of solid-solute V may exist in the ferrite. When an aging treatment is given to a material that has a ferrite+bainite structure in steel components and has C and N controlled relatively in small amounts, it has been found that fine V carbide precipitates not only in the bainite phase but also in the ferrite phase in conformity with the ferrite matrix. It has also been found that the fine V carbide prevents the movement of dislocation that is introduced by the transformation, which enhances the yield strength and, in addition, improves the fatigue strength without lowering the tensile strength if the aging treatment is done at a proper range of temperature.
On the basis of these findings, the present inventors have completed the present invention that provides a production process, of ideal hot forging for producing a steel that has excellent tensile strength, fatigue strength and machinability by applying an aging treatment at a specified range of temperature to a ferrite+bainite structure steel having specified chemical components.
The first aspect of the present invention is a process for producing a hot forged steel of ferrite+bainite structure type characterized by: applying hot forging to a steel product that has a composition by weight of C: 0.10-0.35%, Si: 0.15-2.00%, Mn: 0.40-2.00%, S: 0.03-0.10%, Al: 0.0005-0.050%, Ti: 0.003-0.050%, N: 0.0020-0.0070%, V: 0.30-0.70%, with the balance being Fe and impurities, finishing the forging at a finishing temperature not less than 1050.degree. C.; cooling thereafter so that 80% or more of the metallographic structure after the transformation is a ferrite+bainite structure; and further applying an aging treatment at a temperature of 200.degree.-700.degree. C. According to the second aspect of the invention, one or two or more elements selected from Cr: 0.02-1.50%, Mo: 0.02-1.00%, Nb: 0.001-0.20%, Pb: 0.05-0.30%, and Ca: 0.0005-0.010%, are added to the above steel for the purpose of making the crystal grains finer, adjusting the ratio of the bainite structure, and improving the machinability further.
The reasons for limiting the chemical components of the steel product, limiting the metallographic structure after the transformation following the hot forging and cooling, and limiting the aging treatment condition are explained below.
C: This element is important for adjusting the structure ratio of bainite structure and accordingly increases tensile strength of the final product. However, an excessive content of this element increases the strength excessively and deteriorates the machinability significantly. When present less than 0.10% it makes both the tensile strength and fatigue strength become too low, but carbon contents exceeding 0.35% make the tensile strength too high, causing the machinability significantly to deteriorate. Thus, the range of 0.10-0.35% is specified.
Si: This element is effective for adjusting deoxidization and the ratio of bainite structure. Si contents less than 0.15% do not give enough effect; and Si contents exceeding 2.00% lower both the durability ratio and machinability. Thus, the range of 0.15-2.00% is specified.
Mn: This element adjusts the ratio of bainite structure and forms MnS that brings a base of composite precipitates, giving the precipitation site for ferrite. Mn contents less than 0.40% do not give enough effect and the contents exceeding 2.00% bring too much generation of bainite causing both the durability ratio and machinability lowered. Thus, the range of 0.40-2.00% is specified.
S: This element forms MnS, bringing a base of composite precipitates, and giving the precipitation site for ferrite and improves the machinability. Specified range is 0.03-0.10%.
Al: The element is effective for deoxidizing and refinement of the crystal grains. A1 contents less than 0.0005% do not give enough effect, and the contents exceeding 0. 050% form hard inclusions, causing both the durability ratio and machinability to lower. Thus, the range of 0.0005-0.050% is specified.
Ti: This element precipitates as nitride on MnS, forming the composite precipitation which gives the precipitation site for ferrite. Its presence less than 0,003% does not give enough effect; the presence exceeding 0.050% promotes formation of coarse hard inclusion causing both durability ratio and machinability to lower. Thus, the range of 0.003-0.05% is specified.
N: This element forms nitrides and carbon nitrides with Ti and V. N contents less than 0.0020% do not give enough effect, and the contents exceeding 0,070% lower both the durability ratio and machinability. Thus, the range of 0.0020-0.0070% is specified.
V: This element forms the composite precipitates with MnS and TiN and reinforces the precipitation of matrix ferrite in bainite. V contents less than 0.30% do not give enough effect and the contents exceeding 0.70% lower both durability ratio and machinability. Thus, the range of 0.30-0.70% is specified.
The above are the reasons for specifying the chemical components in the steel according to the first aspect of the present invention. In the second aspect of the present invention, one or two or more elements selected from Cr, Mo, Pb and Ca are contained in addition to the components of the above steel for the purpose of making the crystal grains finer, adjusting the ratio of bainite structure, and improving the machinability further. The reasons for specifying the chemical components are explained below.
Cr: This element adjusts the ratio of bainite structure in nearly the same way as Mn. Cr contents less than 0.02% do not give enough effect but the contents exceeding 1.50% bring too much formation of bainite, causing both the durability ratio and machinability to lower. Thus, the range of 0.02-1.50% is specified.
Mo: This element has effect similar to Mn and. Cr. Mo contents less than 0.02% do not give enough effect; the contents exceeding 1.00% bring too much generation of bainite causing both the durability ratio and machinability to lower. Thus, the range of 0.02-1.00% is specified.
Nb: The element has effect similar to Mn and Cr. Nb contents less than 0.001% do not give enough effect, and the contents exceeding 0.20% bring too much formation of bainite, causing both durability ratio and machinability to lower. Thus, the range of 0.001-0.20% is specified.
Pb: This element improves the machinability. Pb contents less than 0.05% do not give enough effect; the contents exceeding 0.30% saturate such effect and decreases the fatigue strength and durability ratio. Thus, the range of 0.05-0.30% is specified.
Ca: This element has effect similar to Pb. Ca contents less than 0.0005% do not give enough effect, and the contents exceeding 0,010% saturate such effect and decrease the fatigue strength and durability ratio. Thus, the range of 0.0005-0.010% is specified.
Now, the metallographic structure after the transformation following the hot forging and cooling will be discussed. The metallographic structure is required to contain 80% or more of the two-phase structure of ferrite+bainite in order to improve the machinability and the fatigue structure. The contents of pearlite, martensite, and residual austenite in an amount less than 20% as the structure ratio do not hinder the effects of the present invention.
While the cooling method after hot forging is not limited as long as such ferrite-bainite two phase structure is obtained, natural cooling is preferable in view of facilities and production cost as a matter of course. The metallographic structure is confirmed by observing an etching test piece by an optical microscope or others, and by measuring fine hardness of the structure by a micro-Vickers hardness meter.
Finally, the reason for limiting the condition for the aging treatment of the material will be explained. Diffusion of C is difficult when the heating temperature is lower than 200.degree. C. and the effect becomes insufficient. On the other hand, at a temperature exceeding 700.degree. C., the precipitated carbides become coarse and the tensile strength decreases; in addition, the fatigue strength lowers also. Thus, the heating temperature for the aging treatment is specified as 200.degree.-700.degree. C. As long as the heating temperature is within this range, there is no limitation for the heating period of time; however, preferable period is from 10 minutes to 2 hours or so. Any cooling methods including air cooling, water cooling and oil cooling after the aging treatment will bring the effects of the present invention.

THE EFFECTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION ARE SHOWN MORE SPECIFICALLY BY WAY OF EXAMPLES.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Examples
In the tables below, the conditions enclosed by bold lines are embodying examples satisfying the present invention and the others are comparative examples.
(1) Influence of Chemical Components of Steel Material
Each steel having chemical components shown in Table 1 was melted in a high frequency furnace to make a steel ingot of 150 kg. From this ingot, a material for forging was cut out, normalized once with heating to 950.degree. C. followed by allowing to cool down, heated up to 1100.degree.-1250.degree. C. and subjected to hot forging at a temperature of 1050.degree.-1200.degree. C., and thereafter allowed to cool down. From the center part of this material, a JIS No. 4 tensile test piece and a JIS No. 1 rotary bending test piece were sampled and subjected to the tensile test and rotating bending fatigue test respectively. A specimen for observation by an optical microscope was etched with 5% nital, and observed at a magnification 200 to determine the structure ratio of bainite. A specimen for machinability test was further sampled from the material, and a blind hole of 30 mm depth was bored therein by a 10 mm.sup..o slashed. straight shank drill made of SKH9. Total length of the boring was measured until the drill was broken with life. Machinability was evaluated by the relative total boring length supposing the total boring length of conventional No steel 1.00. The cutting speed was 50 m/min, the feed speed was 0.35 mm/rev, and the cutting oil was 7 L/min.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________Weight %No C Si Mn S Al Ti N V Cr Mo Nb Pb Ca__________________________________________________________________________(Part 1)1 Embodying Example 0.13 1.55 1.96 0.036 0.031 0.011 0.0051 0.55 -- -- -- -- -- of the first invention2 Embodying Example 0.19 1.15 1.95 0.045 0.032 0.012 0.0062 0.45 -- -- -- -- -- of the first invention3 Embodying Example 0.24 0.98 1.94 0.054 0.035 0.015 0.0065 0.41 -- -- -- -- -- of the first invention4 Embodying Example 0.32 0.55 1.92 0.064 0.041 0.016 0.0065 0.35 -- -- -- -- -- of the first invention5 Embodying Example 0.33 0.24 1.93 0.075 0.046 0.014 0.0066 0.31 -- -- -- -- -- of the first invention6 Embodying Example 0.27 0.35 1.97 0.056 0.038 0.016 0.0056 0.42 0.35 -- -- -- -- of the second invention7 Embodying Example 0.31 0.29 1.98 0.057 0.035 0.012 0.0055 0.35 -- 0.21 -- -- -- of the second invention8 Embodying Example 0.28 0.22 1.99 0.056 0.025 0.014 0.0057 0.35 -- -- 0.031 -- -- of the second invention9 Embodying Example 0.31 0.26 1.95 0.055 0.026 0.016 0.0051 0.31 0.31 0.18 -- -- -- of the second invention10 Embodying Example 0.25 0.27 1.96 0.052 0.028 0.017 0.0042 0.32 0.25 -- 0.025 -- -- of the second invention11 Embodying Example 0.26 0.31 1.96 0.051 0.031 0.012 0.0048 0.33 -- 0.15 0.021 -- -- of the second invention12 Embodying Example 0.25 0.35 1.97 0.045 0.025 0.014 0.0057 0.35 0.22 0.12 0.021 -- -- of the second invention13 Embodying Example 0.31 0.26 1.96 0.044 0.041 0.015 0.0056 0.31 -- -- -- 0.22 -- of the second invention14 Embodying Example 0.27 0.35 1.98 0.033 0.042 0.011 0.0058 0.36 -- -- -- -- 0.0018 of the second invention15 Embodying Example 0.25 0.20 1.95 0.035 0.043 0.013 0.0059 0.42 -- -- -- 0.12 0.0014 of the second invention16 Embodying Example 0.19 0.38 1.96 0.037 0.044 0.016 0.0061 0.39 0.31 -- -- 0.11 -- of the second invention17 Embodying Example 0.29 1.36 1.96 0.041 0.035 0.017 0.0061 0.33 0.21 0.12 -- -- 0.0016 of the second invention18 Embodying Example 0.27 1.12 1.97 0.046 0.038 0.014 0.0059 0.32 -- 0.11 0.012 0.12 -- of the second invention19 Embodying Example 0.31 0.25 1.96 0.044 0.035 0.013 0.0060 0.37 -- 0.33 -- 0.11 0.0013 of the second invention20 Embodying Example 0.25 0.33 1.95 0.046 0.038 0.011 0.0055 0.33 0.32 -- 0.011 0.11 0.0013 of the second invention21 Comparative Example 0.09 0.24 1.95 0.076 0.046 0.014 0.0066 0.32 -- -- -- -- --22 " 0.45 0.25 1.96 0.075 0.048 0.015 0.0065 0.31 -- -- -- -- --23 " 0.28 0.07 1.95 0.045 0.033 0.012 0.0062 0.45 -- -- -- -- --24 " 0.18 2.21 1.95 0.042 0.032 0.012 0.0063 0.44 -- -- -- -- --25 " 0.32 0.95 0.30 0.054 0.036 0.016 0.0065 0.41 -- -- -- -- --26 " 0.25 0.91 2.15 0.054 0.035 0.015 0.0066 0.43 -- -- -- -- --27 " 0.31 0.55 1.95 0.015 0.041 0.016 0.0065 0.35 -- -- -- -- --28 " 0.30 0.56 1.96 0.121 0.043 0.015 0.0063 0.34 -- -- -- -- --(Part 2)29 " 0.35 0.26 1.96 0.077 0.0002 0.013 0.0064 0.34 -- -- -- -- --30 " 0.34 0.28 1.97 0.075 0.053 0.014 0.0066 0.38 -- -- -- -- --31 " 0.25 0.34 1.97 0.056 0.041 0.001 0.0056 0.41 -- -- -- -- --32 " 0.26 0.35 1.95 0.056 0.038 0.061 0.0056 0.42 -- -- -- -- --33 " 0.28 0.31 1.95 0.057 0.036 0.013 0.0015 0.35 -- -- -- -- --34 " 0.27 0.33 1.96 0.058 0.035 0.012 0.0078 0.35 -- -- -- -- --35 " 0.31 0.22 1.96 0.057 0.026 0.014 0.0055 0.24 -- -- -- -- --36 " 0.30 0.21 1.96 0.056 0.025 0.016 0.0057 0.75 -- -- -- -- --37 " 0.30 0.29 1.95 0.052 0.028 0.015 0.0042 0.32 1.61 -- -- -- --38 " 0.31 0.32 1.96 0.051 0.031 0.012 0.0048 0.33 -- 1.15 -- -- --39 " 0.24 0.35 1.97 0.032 0.025 0.014 0.0057 0.34 -- -- 0.320 -- --40 " 0.26 0.33 1.98 0.044 0.041 0.015 0.0055 0.31 -- -- -- 0.33 --41 " 0.28 0.34 1.96 0.033 0.042 0.011 0.0058 0.36 -- -- -- -- 0.011542 Comparative 0.45 0.23 0.78 0.027 0.028 -- 0.0083 -- -- -- -- -- -- Example: Conventional thermal refined steel__________________________________________________________________________
Table 2 shows the structure ratio of bainite and results of performance evaluation for each sample.
At first, in contrast with No. 42 that is a thermal refined steel having the durability ratio of 0.47 and machinability of 1.00, all of the Nos. 1 through 20 that are Embodying Examples of the present invention show excellent results having durability ratio of 0.56 or more and two or three times better machinability.
No. 21, a Comparative Example, has a low tensile strength and low fatigue strength since the C content is low. No. 22, a Comparative Example, has martensite formed due to the excessive C content and does not satisfy the required range for structure ratio of bainite according to the present invention; although the tensile strength is high, the durability ratio is low compared with Embodying Examples and the machinability is also poor.
No. 23, a Comparative Example, has a low degree of deoxidation since the Si content is low, and the durability ratio is low compared with Embodying Examples. No. 24, a Comparative Example, has martensite formed due to the excessive Si content and does not satisfy the required range for structure ratio of bainite according to the present invention; the durability ratio is low compared with Embodying Examples and the machinability is also poor.
No. 25, a Comparative Example, has a low composite precipitation since the Mn content is low, and has a poor durability ratio compared with Embodying Examples. No. 26, a Comparative Example, has martensite formed due to excessive Mn content and does not satisfy the required range for structure ratio of bainite according to the present invention; the durability ratio is low compared with Embodying Examples and the machinability is also poor.
No. 27, a Comparative Example, has a low composite inclusion since the S content is low and has a poor durability ratio compared with Embodying Examples; the machinability is also poor since the effect of MnS for improving the machinability is not realized. No. 28, a Comparative Example, has an excessive precipitation of Mns since the S content is high, and has a lower durability ratio compared with the Embodying Examples.
No. 29, a Comparative Example, has a low degree of deoxidation and a smaller effect of making crystals fine since the Al content is low, and has a lower durability ratio compared with the Embodying Examples. No. 30, a Comparative Example, has hard inclusion formed because the Al content is high, and has a lower durability ratio compared with the Embodying Examples; the machinability is also poor.
No. 31, a Comparative Example, has a small composite precipitation because the Ti content is low, and has a lower durability ratio compared with the Embodying Examples. No. 32, a Comparative Example, has hard inclusion formed since the Ti content is high, and has a lower durability ratio compared with the Embodying Examples; the machinability is also poor.
No. 33, a Comparative Example, has a small composite precipitation because the N content is low, and has a lower durability ratio compared with the Embodying Examples. No. 34, a Comparative Example, has the matrix hardened because the N content is high, and has a lower durability ratio compared with the Embodying Examples; the machinability is also poor.
No. 35, a Comparative Example, has a small composite precipitation and has a smaller effect to reinforce precipitation of matrix ferrite because the V content is low; thus, the durability ratio is small compared with the Embodying Examples and the durability ratio is also poor. No. 36, a Comparative Example, has a lower durability ratio compared with the Embodying Examples because the V content is high, and the machinability is also poor.
No. 37, a Comparative Example, has martensite formed due to the excessive Cr content and does not satisfy the required range for structure ratio of bainite according to the present invention; the durability ratio is low compared with Embodying Examples and the machinability is also poor.
No. 38, a Comparative Example, has martensite formed due to the excessive Mo content and do not satisfy the required range for structure ratio of bainite according to the present invention; the durability ratio is low compared with Embodying Examples and the machinability is also poor.
No. 39, a Comparative Example, has a poor durability ratio because the Nb content is high and the machinability is also poor.
No. 40, a Comparative Example, has a poor durability ratio although the machinability is good because the Pb content is high.
No. 41, a Comparative Example, has a poor durability ratio although the machinability is good because the Ca content is high.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________ Ferrite + Bainite Mechanical Property Structure Ratio Tensile Yield Fatigue Inventive Strength Strength Yield Strength Durability Machine-No Range Observed (kgf/mm.sup.2) (kgf/mm.sup.2) Ratio (kgf/mm.sup.2) Ratio ability__________________________________________________________________________(Part 1)1 Embodying Example .gtoreq.0.80 0.85 126.6 93.5 0.74 72.0 0.57 1.97 of the First Invention2 Embodying Example " 0.88 118.3 89.0 0.75 66.0 0.56 2.11 of the First Invention3 Embodying Example " 0.90 117.0 88.3 0.75 70.1 0.60 2.14 of the First Invention4 Embodying Example " 0.93 111.5 85.2 0.76 66.1 0.59 2.24 of the First Invention5 Embodying Example " 0.93 104.0 81.1 0.78 60.7 0.58 2.40 of the First Invention6 Embodying Example " 0.91 113.3 86.2 0.76 67.4 0.59 2.21 of the Second Invention7 Embodying Example " 0.92 105.8 82.1 0.78 62.0 0.59 2.36 of the Second Invention8 Embodying Example " 0.91 101.7 79.8 0.78 59.0 0.58 2.46 of the Second Invention9 Embodying Example " 0.92 108.8 83.7 0.77 64.1 0.59 2.30 of the Second Invention10 Embodying Example " 0.90 103.1 80.6 0.78 60.0 0.58 2.43 of the Second Invention11 Embodying Example " 0.90 100.5 79.2 0.79 58.1 0.58 2.49 of the Second Invention12 Embodying Example " 0.90 105.8 82.1 0.78 62.0 0.59 2.36 of the Second Invention13 Embodying Example " 0.92 103.0 80.5 0.78 59.9 0.58 2.67 of the Second Invention14 Embodying Example " 0.91 104.0 81.1 0.78 60.7 0.58 2.64 of the Second Invention15 Embodying Example " 0.90 101.0 79.5 0.79 58.5 0.58 2.72 of the Second Invention16 Embodying Example " 0.88 104.5 81.4 0.78 61.0 0.58 2.63 of the Second Invention17 Embodying Example " 0.92 130.9 95.9 0.73 80.1 0.61 2.10 of the Second Invention18 Embodying Example " 0.91 119.4 89.5 0.75 71.8 0.60 2.30 of the Second Invention19 Embodying Example " 0.92 105.5 81.9 0.78 61.7 0.59 2.61 of the Second Invention20 Embodying Example " 0.90 104.0 77.2 0.74 62.1 0.60 2.64 of the Second Invention21 Comparative Example " 0.85 82.5 60.5 0.73 40.2 0.49 3.0322 " " 0.75 131.2 98.5 0.75 58.3 0.44 0.9523 " " 0.91 102.1 80.1 0.78 50.2 0.49 2.4524 " " 0.77 140.8 109.9 0.78 73.8 0.52 0.8825 " " 0.92 94.0 75.6 0.80 45.2 0.48 2.6626 " " 0.75 132.3 105.2 0.80 61.7 0.47 0.8527 " " 0.92 111.1 85.0 0.77 55.7 0.50 0.77(Part 2)28 " " 0.93 110.2 84.5 0.77 55.1 0.50 3.3529 " " 0.94 107.9 83.3 0.77 53.7 0.50 2.3230 " " 0.95 109.5 84.1 0.77 54.7 0.50 0.8831 " " 0.91 104.1 81.1 0.78 51.4 0.49 2.4032 " " 0.94 105.3 81.8 0.78 52.1 0.50 0.8733 " " 0.93 103.0 80.6 0.78 50.7 0.49 2.4334 " " 0.92 102.8 80.4 0.78 50.6 0.49 0.9635 " " 0.91 98.9 78.3 0.79 48.2 0.49 2.5336 " " 0.94 120.8 90.3 0.75 61.6 0.51 0.9537 " " 0.72 134.1 97.6 0.73 69.7 0.52 0.8538 " " 0.71 125.3 95.5 0.76 52.1 0.42 0.8439 " " 0.91 100.2 79.0 0.79 49.0 0.49 0.8840 " " 0.92 100.4 79.1 0.79 49.1 0.49 2.7441 " " 0.91 104.3 81.3 0.78 51.5 0.49 2.6442 " (QT Structure) 81.3 65.9 0.81 38.2 0.47 1.00__________________________________________________________________________
(2) Influence of Cooling Method After Hot Forging on the Ratio of Ferrite+Bainite Structure
Each steel having chemical components shown in Table 1 was melted in a high frequency furnace to make a steel ingot of 150 kg. From this ingot, a material for forging was cut out, normalized once with heating at a temperature of 950.degree. C. followed by allowing to cool down, heated up to 1100.degree.-1250.degree. C. and subjected to hot forging at a temperature of 1050.degree.-1200.degree. C., and thereafter allowed to cool down in a way as shown in Table 3. Furthermore, these products were subjected an aging treatment by charging them into a heating furnace at a temperature of 400.degree. C. for 1 hour. From the center part of this material, the tensile strength, fatigue strength, machinability and ratio of ferrite+bainite structure were determined in the same procedures as Embodying Example 1. Table 4 shows the ratio of bainite structure and results of performance evaluation for each sample.
Nos. 43, 44, 45 and 46 all have 0.8 or higher of the ratio of ferrite+bainite structure satisfying the requirement according to the present invention; all have good machinability nearly 2.5 times as high as No. 48, a conventional thermal refined steel, while the durability ratio is kept 0.56 or more.
No. 47 has a structure mainly composed of martensite by increasing the cooling speed; while the tensile strength is enhanced, the durability ratio is extremely low and the machinability is poor with short tool life.
TABLE 3______________________________________ Average Cooling Method Cooling SpeedNo Sample Steel After Forging at 800-500.degree. C.______________________________________43 No. 20 of Table 1 Slow cooling in Ca. 0.30.degree. C./Sec. glass wool insulat- ing material44 " Natural cooling Ca. 0.80.degree. C./Sec.45 " Cooling in breeze Ca. 1.40.degree. C./Sec.46 " Quenching by water Ca. 4.00.degree. C./Sec. mist injection47 " Thrown into oil Ca. 30.00.degree. C./Sec. hardening bath, quench hardening48 No. 42 of Table 1 Oil hardening at -- Control Steel: 875.degree. C., tempering Conventional at 570.degree. C., then thermal refined water cooling steel______________________________________
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________ Ferrite + Bainite Mechanical Property Structure Ratio Tensile Yield Fatigue Inventive Strength Strength Yield Strength Durability Machine-No Sample Steel Range Observed (kgf/mm.sup.2) (kgf/mm.sup.2) Ratio (kgf/mm.sup.2) Ratio ability__________________________________________________________________________43 Embodying Example .gtoreq.0.80 0.88 100.5 72.5 0.72 58.8 0.59 2.7444 " .gtoreq.0.80 0.90 104.0 77.2 0.74 62.1 0.60 2.6445 " .gtoreq.0.80 0.92 108.2 82.5 0.76 60.5 0.56 2.5446 " .gtoreq.0.80 0.85 115.1 87.8 0.76 64.5 0.56 2.3947 Comparative .gtoreq.0.80 0.61 1221.2 95.8 0.79 60.5 0.50 1.25 Example48 (QT Structure) .gtoreq.0.80 0.00 81.3 65.9 0.81 38.2 0.47 1.00__________________________________________________________________________
(3) Influence of Change of Aging Treatment Temperature
The steel having the same chemical components as Embodying Example 2 was melted in a high frequency furnace to make a steel ingot of 150 kg. From this ingot, a material for forging was cut out, normalized once with heating at a temperature of 950.degree. C. followed by allowing to cool down, heated up to 1100.degree.-1250.degree. C. and subjected to hot forging at a temperature of 1050.degree.-1200.degree. C., and thereafter allowed to cool down. Furthermore, samples of this product were subjected to an aging treatment by charging them into a heating furnace at a temperature shown in Table 5 for 1 hour. For these materials, the tensile strength, fatigue strength, and machinability were determined and observation of the metallographic structure was made by the same procedures as Embodying Example 1. Table 6 shows the results of performance evaluation for each sample.
Nos. 50, 51 and 52 all satisfy the requirement range of 200.degree.-700.degree. C. for the aging treatment temperature and have good machinability nearly 2.5 times as high as No. 54, a conventional thermal refined steel, while the durability ratio is kept 0.58 or more.
In the case of No. 49, the aging treatment temperature was lower than the range specified in the present invention and the durability ratio is poor. In the case of No. 53, the aging treatment temperature was higher than the range specified in the present invention and the durability ratio is poor.
TABLE 5______________________________________No Sample Steel Tempering Condition______________________________________49 No. 20 of Table 1 100.degree. C. .times. 1 hr .fwdarw. Water Cooling50 " 300.degree. C. .times. 1 hr .fwdarw. Water Cooling51 " 400.degree. C. .times. 1 hr .fwdarw. Water Cooling52 " 600.degree. C. .times. 1 hr .fwdarw. Water Cooling53 " 720.degree. C. .times. 1 hr .fwdarw. Water Cooling54 No. 42 of Table 1 Oil hardening at 875.degree. C., Control Steel: tempering at 570.degree. C., then water Conventional thermal cooling refined steel______________________________________
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________ Ferrite + Bainite Mechanical Property Structure Ratio Tensile Yield Fatigue Inventive Strength Strength Yield Strength Durability Machine-No Sample Steel Range Observed (kgf/mm.sup.2) (kgf/mm.sup.2) Ratio (kgf/mm.sup.2) Ratio ability__________________________________________________________________________49 Comparative .gtoreq.0.80 0.90 108.1 65.1 0.60 55.4 0.51 2.54 Example50 Emboding Example .gtoreq.0.80 0.90 106.4 75.6 0.71 62.1 0.58 2.5851 Emboding Example .gtoreq.0.80 0.90 104.0 77.2 0.74 62.1 0.60 2.6452 Emboding Example .gtoreq.0.80 0.90 100.5 77.1 0.77 59.5 0.59 2.7453 Comparative .gtoreq.0.80 0.90 95.1 72.1 0.76 47.0 0.49 2.89 Example54 (QT Structure) .gtoreq.0.80 0.00 81.3 65.9 0.81 38.2 0.47 1.00__________________________________________________________________________
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
As described above, the invention provides process for producing an ideal hot forged steel; the steel according to the present invention has high tensile strength while keeping the machinability by forming a two-phase structure of ferrite+bainite. Furthermore, the steel is able to have improved durability ratio, namely fatigue strength, without sacrificing the machinability by realization of fine metallographic structure by use of composite precipitates formed by MnS, Ti nitride and V nitride and by simultaneous realization of reinforcement of the ferrite matrix in bainite by V carbide (or carbon nitride); and the steel further has high yield strength by maintaining high V and low C and N before the aging treatment. Thus, great industrial effects are realized.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
5041167	Miwa	Aug 1991
5213634	DeArdo et al.	May 1993

Process for producing hot forged steel having excellent fatigue strength, yield strength, and machinability

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (1)

US Referenced Citations (2)