1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a process for producing a magnetic tape. More particularly, the present invention relates to a process for producing a magnetic tape suitable for use in backup of data for computer.
2. Description of the Related Arts
In a stage for producing a wide variety of tape for storing backup data of computer represented by cassette tape and videotape, wide raw fabric (hereinafter referred to as “web”) wound on a rewinding reel in a bulk state is supplied to a slitter via a plurality of guide rollers, and is cut into magnetic tapes by means of the slitter. Each of cut magnetic tapes is continuously transferred to a winding machine side to be wound on a hub.
Here, it is required for the cassette tape and the videotape that the size of each tape in the width direction should be within the tolerable error level of ±10 μm. On the other hand, in the case of a metal tape for storing backup data of computer, since at least one servo track is recorded on at least one side of the width direction of the tape, it is required that the size of each tape in the width direction should be within the tolerable error level of ±5 μm. Irregardless of the width, a highly precise slitter having an element precision of ±2 μm is used.
However, in spite of using such a highly precise slitter, there occurs the situation in the actual magnetic tape production line where the width size of each of magnetic tapes cut from a portion near the center of the web in the width direction sometimes becomes +8 μm, which largely exceeds the upper limit of the tolerable error level.
For this reason, we have searched the cause the width size of each of magnetic tapes cut from a portion near the center of the web in the width direction sometimes exceeds the tolerable error level. We have investigated the causes, and as a result, we have found the followings:
In the web wound on the rewinding reel, the thickness at the portion near the center in the width direction is formed into a cross sectional shape such that it is slightly larger than that of portions near both sides. Accordingly, the web wound on the rewinding reel in a bulk state is in a barrel state that the portion near the center in the width direction is slightly swelled, and the diameter of the portion near the center in the width direction is larger than that of the portion near each of both sides. For this reason, as for the pass line of the web from the rewinding reel to the slitter via the plurality of guide rollers onto which the web is rolled, the pass line near the center portion is slightly longer than that of the pass line of the portion near each of both sides, and the tension of the web supplied to the slitter in the portion near the center is slightly decreased in comparison with that in the portion near each of both sides. As a result, at the portion near the center in the width direction, each of the magnetic tapes is deformed toward the width direction, and it has been found that the width greatly exceeds the tolerable error level. In addition, it has been discovered that when the web is extended in the width direction immediately before the web is cut by the slitter, the width size of each of the magnetic tapes can be produced within the tolerable error range of ±5 μm.
According to the present invention, a process for producing a magnetic tape is provided, in which a web is extended in the width direction immediately before it is cut by a slitter when the web is supplied to the slitter to be cut into several magnetic tapes.
According to the process for producing a magnetic tape, since the web is extended in the width direction immediately before it is cut by the slitter, the decreasing of the tension of the web at the portion near the center in the width direction to be supplied to the slitter is dispelled, making the tension of the web in the width direction uniform. As a result, the deformation of each of the magnetic tapes at the time of cutting the web through the slitter can be suppressed, which makes it possible that the width size of each of the magnetic tapes is within the tolerable error level of ±5 μm.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by reference to the attached drawings.
The process for producing a magnetic tape according to the present invention is applied to a process line shown in
The web WB comprises a wide base film having a magnetic coat layer formed on the front surface thereof and a back coat layer on the rear surface thereof, and is formed so that the thickness of the central portion 10 in the width direction is slightly thicker than those of both side portions 20 in the width direction in order to prevent the slipped wound of the web onto the rewinding reel 1.
The slitter 2 is an apparatus having several pairs of rotating blades 2A and 2B each disposed at a prescribed interval, between which the web WB is introduced for cutting it into a plurality of magnetic tapes TP. For example, the slitter 2 cuts the web WB into 100 to 500 magnetic tapes at a predetermined width of 12.65 mm (½ inch), mm (1 inch) or 3.81 mm. For example, in the case of cutting the web WB into 12.65 mm wide tapes, the slitter 2 has an element precision, which can be cut into tapes within a tolerable error level of ±2 μm.
The ground suction drum 5 rotates with sucking the web WB on the circumference surface thereof in order to define the transfer rate of the web WB. Taking the circumferential speed of the ground suction drum 5 as a standard, the rotation speed of the winding hub 3A of the winding apparatus 3 is controlled.
Here, it should be noted that as for the diameter of the web WB wound on the rewinding roll 1 in a bulk state, the diameter near the center in the width direction is approximately 2 mm lager than that near each of both sides as described previously, in the pass line from the rewinding reel 1 to the slitter 2 via the plurality of guide rollers 4 onto which the web WB is rolled, the pass line near the center portion is slightly longer than that of the pass line of the portion near each of both sides. For this reason, there is a tendency that the tension of the web WB supplied to the slitter 2 in the portion near the center is a slightly decreased in comparison with that in the portion near each of both sides. In the present invention, in order to cancel the decreasing of the tension of the web WB supplied to the slitter 2 in the portion near the center in the width direction and to make the tension of the web WB in the width direction uniform, an extension roller apparatus 7 is provided near the slitter 2.
As shown in
Although the pair of the horizontally disposed extension rollers 7B and 7B may be composed of crown rollers each having a long shaft, they are preferably composed of taper rollers having a short shaft, in which case even at a relatively small contact angle, they can allow the web for extending in the width direction in a sufficient manner. As shown in
The extension roller 7B has the maximum diameter of approximately 40 mm, a width of approximately 15 mm, a taper of approximately 20° in each side. The contact angle α of the extension roller relative to the transferring direction is set ranging from 1 to 5°, and preferably 1 to 3°. The pressure of the extension roller 7B in contact with the backup roller 7A is set ranging from 100 to 2000 g, and preferably from 500 to 1000 g.
In the production line of the magnetic tape constructed as described above (see
In the stage of producing the magnetic tape TP as described above, the pair of the extension rollers 7B, 7B horizontally disposed in a V shape having the contact angle of α as shown in
As an example, the production line of the magnetic tape having the extension roller apparatus 7 as shown in
The results measured are shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2001-116886 | Apr 2001 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
207192 | McLean | Aug 1878 | A |
2461376 | Feldmeier | Feb 1949 | A |
3161563 | Waler et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3246816 | Dexter et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3294330 | Whiteley | Dec 1966 | A |
3325857 | Conti | Jun 1967 | A |
3494525 | Wiig | Feb 1970 | A |
4168598 | Omori | Sep 1979 | A |
4221145 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4404906 | Curran | Sep 1983 | A |
4438888 | Seelinger | Mar 1984 | A |
4741922 | Wales et al. | May 1988 | A |
5388513 | Ohta | Feb 1995 | A |
5501386 | Kobayashi | Mar 1996 | A |
5570831 | Takeda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5651488 | Goretzky | Jul 1997 | A |
5788797 | Herrin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6244145 | Hada et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020149866 A1 | Oct 2002 | US |