Process for producing masonry block with roughened surface

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5879603
  • Patent Number
    5,879,603
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 8, 1996
    28 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 9, 1999
    25 years ago
Abstract
A mold for producing a masonry unit with a roughened texture side surface having a plurality of side walls defining a mold cavity open at its top and bottom, adapted to receive masonry fill material by way of its open top, and to discharge molded fill material in the form of a block of predetermined height by way of its open bottom; and opposed, inwardly extending generally parallel upper and lower lips along at least one of said side walls, the upper lip being located at a predetermined height above the lower lip and the lower lip being located at the bottom of the mold cavity.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
I have experimented with molds of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,940,229 for the purpose of making concrete masonry units with a roughened texture on at least one face. In this type of mold, one of the walls of the mold includes an inwardly extending lip on the lower edge of the wall. The specification of the '229 patent describes this lower lip as producing a scraping or tearing action on the adjacent surface of the green concrete masonry unit as it is stripped from the mold, to produce a roughened texture on the finished product. In my observation, the lower lip acts by retaining a portion of the fill material in place against at least a portion of the associated mold wall as the mold is stripped. Thus the lip catches some of the aggregate in the material, and pulls, or rolls, it up the side of the green block as it is stripped from the mold, thus causing the roughened surface.
As I experimented with this mold, the thought occurred to me that I might get an improved roughened face if I positioned an upper lip along the same wall carrying the lower lip. My thought was that an upper lip of the same depth as the lower lip, positioned just at the compacted fill level of the mold cavity, might block fill from "squirting" out between the mold wall and the stripper shoe as the mold was stripped from the block. Of course, the more I thought about this, I realized that, as the mold was stripped, this upper lip would be moving progressively further away from the molded block, so that the effect which I at first envisioned couldn't occur as I envisioned it. Nonetheless, I decided to experiment by positioning an upper lip as described.
When I produced blocks in the mold with the additional upper lip, it appeared to me that a somewhat rougher-textured block was produced than was produced in the mold without the upper lip. To date, I have no definitive explanation for why this occurs. My present theory is that the upper lip somehow interacts with the mold vibration to produce more compaction of the material adjacent the associated wall than is the case when no upper lip is employed, and that this improved compaction at the wall enhances the roughening effect of the lower lip. This is consistent with my observation of the mold cavity immediately following stripping of the mold. In the case of a mold having only a lower lip, I observed that some of the fill material remained adhered to the end wall above the lower lip. This material extended approximately halfway up the wall along its entire length, and was somewhat discontinuous in its coverage. In the case of a mold having both an upper and a lower lip, I observed that more fill material remained adhered to the end wall between the upper and lower lips, that it was a thicker, more compacted layer of material, and that it was more continuous in its coverage. In both cases, when a new pallet is positioned against the bottom of the mold--the pallet typically slaps the bottom of the mold as it moves into position--the material adhering to the end wall is generally knocked loose from the wall.
Not only did the upper lip act to produce a somewhat rougher surface, but it also provided a useful alignment guide for positioning of the stripper shoe, so that it would not interfere with the lower lip as the mold is stripped.
I am also aware of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,078,940 and 5,217,630, which also describe a mold like that shown in the '229 patent having a lower lip on one wall to produce a rough textured surface on a concrete masonry unit. The '940 and '630 patents describe the use of a screen and a series of projections on the mold wall to hold fill material against the wall as the mold is stripped. I believe that maintenance of such a screen would prove difficult in a typical production environment, and that the use of such a screen and projections would result in a mold that is not self-cleaning, and will require frequent stoppages in production to clear before material becomes unacceptably hard against the wall.
My mold does not have either of these problems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
My invention is a mold for producing a masonry unit with a roughened texture side surface. The mold has a plurality of side walls defining the mold cavity. The mold cavity is open at its top and bottom and adapted to receive masonry fill material by way of its open top. The mold is also adapted to discharge molded fill material by way of its open bottom in the form of blocks of a predetermined height. After the mold is filled, the fill material is compacted by vibration and the action of a stripper shoe plate to a predetermined, compacted level corresponding with the finished height of the finished block. The mold also includes opposed, inwardly extending upper and lower lips along at least one of the side walls. The upper lip is located at about the predetermined compacted fill level of the mold cavity. The lower lip is located at the bottom of the mold cavity.
My invention provides a low maintenance, self-cleaning mold for production of concrete block with roughened surfaces without the use of means such as block splitters. Additionally, the use of an upper lip aids in properly aligning the stripper shoe head.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a mold.
FIG. 2A is a sectional view of the mold shown in FIG. 1 taken at line 2A--2A.
FIG. 2B is a sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the mold shown in FIG. 1, having a bevelled upper lip.
FIG. 3 is a sectional view of the mold shown in FIG. 2 additionally showing the action of a stripper shoe converging on the filled cavity.
FIG. 4 is a sectional view of the mold shown in FIG. 2 showing the action of the stripper shoe head compressing the mold fill and stripping the block from the mold.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a block made with the process of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
My invention is a mold for producing a masonry unit or block with a roughened texture side surface without the use of apparatus such as splitters. My invention may be used with any number of different types of molds to produce any variety of blocks. An example of my mold 10 can be seen in FIG. 1. The mold may have a single cavity 12 or, as can be seen in FIG. 1, multiple cavities. Side walls 14, 16, 18, 20 define the mold cavity 12. The mold is open at its top and bottom. The mold is adapted to rest on a metal pallet 60, (FIG. 4) to receive fill material. The mold open top allows it to receive fill up to a predetermined level in the cavity. The mold open bottom allows discharge of the molded fill material. After the mold is filled, the fill material is compacted by vibration and the action of a stripper shoe plate to a predetermined, compacted level corresponding with the finished height of the finished block. The mold also comprises an opposed, inwardly extending generally parallel upper lip 30 and lower lip 32 along at least one of the side walls 14. Preferably, the upper lip 30 is located at about the predetermined compacted fill level of the mold cavity 12, FIG. 2A. The lower lip 32 is located at the bottom of the mold cavity 12 (FIG. 2A).
As depicted in FIG. 2A, the wall (14) is substantially flat without projections between lower lip (32) and upper lip (30).
Preferably, the upper and lower lips each extend from the side wall 14 into the cavity approximately 0.187 inches. The shape of the lower lip in cross section is preferably a wedge as shown in FIG. 2A. The presently preferred dimensions of the wedge are a thickness of about 1/4 inch adjacent wall 14, and a thickness of about 1/16 inch at is outboard end. The presently preferred profile of the lower lip is that it be a straight outboard edge along its entire length. However, other shapes, such as serrated or scalloped, can be used to produce different roughened textures on the face of the finished masonry unit. In the presently preferred embodiment, the upper lip 30 is provided by means of a bar having a generally rectangular cross section which is affixed to side wall 14. The lower edge of this bar defines lip 30. In height it is presently preferred that this bar extend upwardly from the predetermined compacted fill level of the mold, to a point above the predetermined initial fill level of the mold. The clearance between the stripper shoe plate and the outboard end of the upper lip is preferably about 1/16 inch. I have had some success in producing satisfactory rough-textured blocks when the upper lip 30 is positioned below the compacted fill line of the mold, as well. In particular, I have made four inch high blocks with the upper and lower lips positioned only two inches apart with satisfactory results. A one inch spacing did not produce satisfactory results. The upper lip 30 may also include bevel 30' to guide the stripper shoe as it is inserted into the mold cavity during compression, FIG. 2B.
Both the upper lip 30 and lower lip 32 may be releasably attached to the side wall by means such as bolts, screws, etc. which allows for their removal. This is important because both the upper 30 and lower 32 lips are wear points in the mold apparatus and may after time wear, chip or break. Alternatively, the upper 30 and lower 32 lip may be welded to the mold side wall.
To use my invention, the mold 10 receives masonry fill to a predetermined initial fill level. Masonry fill generally is composed of aggregate such as sand and gravel, cement, and water.
The mold is then vibrated for several seconds, the time necessary to ensure the fill is uniformly spread throughout the mold. This vibrating may occur in concert with the compressive action of the stripper head 40 onto the fill 50 in the mold 10, FIG. 3. At this time the mold will then be vibrated for the time in which the head is compressed onto the fill. The combined action of the vibration and the stripper head lowers the level of the fill to a predetermined, compacted level, corresponding with the height of the finished unit.
The pressure applied by the stripper shoe ranges from about 1,000 to 8,000 psi and preferably is about 4,000 psi. Once the compression period is over the stripper shoe 40 in combination with the underlying pallet 60 acts to strip the blocks from the mold, FIG. 4. The lower lip 32 acts to strip fill 50' from the remainder of the masonry unit or block at what will become the roughened surface 45 of the block 50. This provides a masonry unit or block 50 having a roughened surface 45. The roughened texture produced has a shingled appearance with interspersed aggregate and pock marks. Once the molded fill material is stripped from the mold the block 50 is formed, FIG. 5.
Any of a number of vertically stripping block machines may be used in combination with my new mold. One such block machine which has been found useful in the formation of blocks is a Besser V-3/12 block machine. Other patents which I know of that are related to block forming include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,249,950 and 5,062,610 which are both incorporated herein by reference.
Once the blocks are formed they may be cured through any means known to those with skill in the art. Curing mechanisms such as simple air curing, autoclaving, steam curing or mist curing are all useful methods of curing the block resulting from my invention.
The above discussions, examples and embodiments illustrated are current understanding of the invention, however, since many variations of the invention can be made with departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides wholly in the claims hereafter appended.
Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing a masonry unit with roughened texture side surface, said method comprising the steps of:
  • a) filling a mold with masonry fill to a first level, said mold comprising a plurality of side walls defining a mold cavity open at its top and bottom, adapted to receive masonry fill material by way of its open top, and to discharge molded fill material in the form of a molded masonry unit of predetermined height by way of its open bottom, and inwardly extending and generally parallel upper and lower lips along at least one of said side walls, said lower lip being located at the bottom of the mold cavity, said upper lip being located on said at least one side wall at about said predetermined height above said lower lip, said side wall being continuous without projections between said lower lip and said upper lip
  • b) compacting the masonry fill within the mold to a second level corresponding with the predetermined height of the molded masonry unit;
  • c) discharging the molded masonry unit from the mold such that substantially all of the masonry fill is removed from said side wall between said lower lip and said upper lip; and
  • d) curing the masonry unit.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said upper and lower lips each extend from said at least one side wall about the same distance.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein said upper lip comprises the lower surface of a bar, said bar being affixed on said at least one side wall and having an upper surface located above said first fill level.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the bar has a generally rectangular cross section, and its upper surface includes a beveled edge adapted to act as an alignment guide for a stripper shoe plate which can be extended into the mold cavity through the top of the mold cavity.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 wherein said lower lip is releasably affixed to said at least one mold side wall.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein said bar is releasably affixed to said at least one mold side wall.
US Referenced Citations (207)
Number Name Date Kind
RE34314 Forsberg Jul 1993
126547 Hickcox May 1872
228052 Frost May 1880
D237704 Lane Nov 1975
D279030 Risi et al. May 1985
D280024 Risi et al. Aug 1985
D284109 Seal, Jr. Jun 1986
D295788 Forsberg May 1988
D295790 Forsberg May 1988
D296007 Forsberg May 1988
D296365 Forsberg Jun 1988
D297464 Forsberg Aug 1988
D297574 Forsberg Sep 1988
D297767 Forsberg Sep 1988
D298463 Forsberg Nov 1988
D299067 Forsberg Dec 1988
D299069 Risi et al. Dec 1988
D300253 Forsberg Mar 1989
D300254 Forsberg Mar 1989
D301064 Forsberg May 1989
D311444 Forsberg Oct 1990
D316904 Forsberg May 1991
D317048 Forsberg May 1991
D317209 Forsberg May 1991
468838 Steiger Feb 1892
566924 Morrin Sep 1896
810748 Haller et al. Jan 1906
831077 Johnson Sep 1906
847476 Hodges Mar 1907
884354 Bertrand Apr 1908
916756 Grant Mar 1909
1002161 Lambert Aug 1911
1092621 Worner Apr 1914
1219127 Marshall Mar 1917
1222061 Bartells Apr 1917
1248070 Buente Nov 1917
1285458 Strunk Nov 1918
1287055 Lehman Dec 1918
1330884 McDermott Feb 1920
1414444 Straight May 1922
1419805 Bigler Jun 1922
1456498 Binns May 1923
1465608 McCoy Aug 1923
1472917 Laird Nov 1923
1534353 Besser Apr 1925
1557946 Smith Oct 1925
1695997 Evers et al. Dec 1928
1727363 Bone Sep 1929
1733790 Gilman Oct 1929
1751028 Caswell et al. Mar 1930
1773579 Flath Aug 1930
1872522 Stuckey Aug 1932
1907053 Flath May 1933
1993291 Vermont May 1935
2011531 Tranchell Aug 1935
2034851 Wichmann Mar 1936
2094167 Evers Sep 1937
2113076 Bruce Apr 1938
2121450 Sentrop Jun 1938
2149957 Dawson Mar 1939
2197960 Alexander Apr 1940
2219606 Schoick Oct 1940
2235646 Schaffer Mar 1941
2313363 Schmitt Mar 1943
2371201 Wells Mar 1945
2570384 Russell Oct 1951
2593606 Price Apr 1952
2683916 Kelly Jul 1954
2881753 Entz Apr 1959
2882689 Huch et al. Apr 1959
2892340 Fort Jun 1959
2925080 Smith Feb 1960
2963828 Belliveau Dec 1960
3036407 Dixon May 1962
3185432 Hager, Jr. May 1965
3204316 Jackson Sep 1965
3274742 Paul, Jr. et al. Sep 1966
3378885 Dart Apr 1968
3386503 Corning et al. Jun 1968
3390502 Carroll Jul 1968
3392719 Clanton et al. Jul 1968
3430404 Muse Mar 1969
3488964 Kubo Jan 1970
3557505 Kaul Jan 1971
3631682 Hilfiker et al. Jan 1972
3659077 Olson Apr 1972
3667186 Kato Jun 1972
3754499 Heisman et al. Aug 1973
3783566 Nielson Jan 1974
3888060 Haener Jun 1975
3925994 Broms et al. Dec 1975
3932098 Huber et al. Jan 1976
3936987 Calvin Feb 1976
3936989 Hancock Feb 1976
3940229 Hutton Feb 1976
3953979 Kurose May 1976
3981038 Vidal Sep 1976
3981953 Haines Sep 1976
3995434 Kato et al. Dec 1976
4001988 Riefler Jan 1977
4016693 Warren Apr 1977
4023767 Fontana May 1977
4051570 Hilfiker Oct 1977
4067166 Sheahan Jan 1978
4083190 Pey Apr 1978
4098040 Riefler Jul 1978
4098865 Repasky Jul 1978
4107894 Mullins Aug 1978
4110949 Cambiuzzi et al. Sep 1978
4114773 Sekiguchi Sep 1978
4124961 Habegger Nov 1978
4126979 Hancock Nov 1978
4132492 Jenkins Jan 1979
4175888 Ijima Nov 1979
4186540 Mullins Feb 1980
4187069 Mullins Feb 1980
4190384 Neumann Feb 1980
4193718 Wahrendorf et al. Mar 1980
4207718 Schaaf et al. Jun 1980
4208850 Collier Jun 1980
4214655 Bernham et al. Jul 1980
4218206 Mullins Aug 1980
4228628 Schlomann Oct 1980
4229123 Heinzmann Oct 1980
4238105 West Dec 1980
4242299 Adams Dec 1980
4250863 Gagnon et al. Feb 1981
4262463 Hapel Apr 1981
4288960 Auras Sep 1981
4312606 Sarikelle Jan 1982
4314431 Rabassa Feb 1982
4319440 Rassias et al. Mar 1982
4324505 Hammett Apr 1982
4335549 Dean, Jr. Jun 1982
4337605 Tudek Jul 1982
4372091 Brown et al. Feb 1983
4380091 Lively Apr 1983
4380409 O'Neill Apr 1983
4384810 Neumann May 1983
4426176 Terada Jan 1984
4426815 Brown Jan 1984
4449857 Davis May 1984
4454699 Strobl Jun 1984
4470728 Broadbent Sep 1984
4490075 Risi et al. Dec 1984
4496266 Ruckstuhl Jan 1985
4512685 Hegle Apr 1985
4524551 Scheiwiller Jun 1985
4572699 Rinninger Feb 1986
4616959 Hifiker Oct 1986
4640071 Haener Feb 1987
4651485 Osborne Mar 1987
4658541 Haile Apr 1987
4659304 Day Apr 1987
4660342 Salisbury Apr 1987
4661023 Hifiker Apr 1987
4671706 Giardini Jun 1987
4684294 O'Neill Aug 1987
4698949 Dietrich Oct 1987
4711606 Leling et al. Dec 1987
4721847 Leverenz Jan 1988
4726567 Greenberg Feb 1988
4728227 Wilson et al. Mar 1988
4738059 Dean, Jr. Apr 1988
4745720 Taylor May 1988
4770218 Duerr Sep 1988
4784821 Leopold Nov 1988
4802320 Forsberg Feb 1989
4802836 Whissell Feb 1989
4815897 Risi et al. Mar 1989
4824293 Brown et al. Apr 1989
4825619 Forsberg May 1989
4860505 Bender Aug 1989
4884921 Smith Dec 1989
4896472 Hunt Jan 1990
4896999 Ruckstuhl Jan 1990
4909010 Gravier Mar 1990
4909717 Pardo Mar 1990
4914876 Forsberg Apr 1990
4936712 Glickman Jun 1990
4964761 Rossi Oct 1990
4965979 Larrivee et al. Oct 1990
4990032 Smith Feb 1991
5017049 Sievert May 1991
5031376 Bender et al. Jul 1991
5044834 Janopaul, Jr. Sep 1991
5062610 Woolford et al. Nov 1991
5078940 Sayles Jan 1992
5104594 Hillemeier et al. Apr 1992
5125815 Kargarzadeh et al. Jun 1992
5139721 Castonguay et al. Aug 1992
5158132 Guillemot Oct 1992
5161918 Hodel Nov 1992
5217630 Sayles Jun 1993
5249950 Woolford Oct 1993
5261806 Pleasant Nov 1993
5294216 Sievert Mar 1994
5337527 Wagenaar Aug 1994
5353569 Rodrique Oct 1994
5421034 Keune Jun 1995
5421135 Stevens et al. Jun 1995
5484236 Gravier Jan 1996
5490363 Woolford Feb 1996
5505034 Dueck Apr 1996
5653558 Price Aug 1997
5688079 Bolduc et al. Nov 1997
5704183 Woolford Jan 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (92)
Number Date Country
274426 Dec 1927 AUX
2239783 Jun 1985 AUX
B-6747781 Dec 1985 AUX
548 462 Dec 1985 AUX
5276586 Aug 1986 AUX
8077587 Apr 1988 AUX
528788 Dec 1954 BEX
338139 Dec 1933 CAX
531354 Oct 1958 CAX
941626 Feb 1974 CAX
1040452 Oct 1978 CAX
1065154 Oct 1979 CAX
DES. 47747 Jan 1981 CAX
DES. 50020 Jul 1982 CAX
DES. 51160 Apr 1983 CAX
DES. 51313 May 1983 CAX
1182295 Feb 1985 CAX
1188116 Jun 1985 CAX
1194703 Oct 1985 CAX
1197391 Dec 1985 CAX
1204296 May 1986 CAX
DES. 62875 Apr 1989 CAX
DES. 63365 May 1989 CAX
DES. 63366 May 1989 CAX
DES. 65896 Apr 1990 CAX
DES. 66760 Aug 1990 CAX
2012286 Sep 1991 CAX
0 039 372 Nov 1981 EPX
0 130 921 Jan 1985 EPX
0 170 113 Jul 1985 EPX
0 215 991 Sep 1985 EPX
0 322 668 Dec 1988 EPX
0 362 110 Apr 1990 EPX
0 490 534 Jun 1992 EPX
392 474 Nov 1908 FRX
1 360 872 Apr 1963 FRX
2 228 900 May 1974 FRX
2 243 304 Sep 1974 FRX
2 343 871 May 1976 FRX
2 422 780 Dec 1978 FRX
2 409 351 Jun 1979 FRX
2 463 237 Aug 1979 FRX
2 465 032 Sep 1979 FRX
2 476 179 Aug 1981 FRX
2561684 Sep 1985 FRX
2 622 227 Dec 1989 FRX
22 59 654 Jun 1974 DEX
18 11 932 Jun 1978 DEX
27 55 833 Jul 1978 DEX
27 19 107 Nov 1978 DEX
34 01 629 Jul 1984 DEX
90 15 196 Feb 1991 DEX
341611 Jan 1936 ITX
456776 Apr 1950 ITX
459942 Oct 1950 ITX
0709599 Jun 1966 ITX
92167 Jul 1948 NZX
151299 Apr 1969 NZX
218830 Sep 1989 NZX
215196 Dec 1989 NZX
24781 May 1993 NZX
25133 Jun 1994 NZX
25131 Jun 1994 NZX
25132 Jun 1994 NZX
27313 Jun 1996 NZX
27314 Jun 1996 NZX
27315 Jun 1996 NZX
27316 Jun 1996 NZX
27317 Jun 1996 NZX
27318 Jun 1996 NZX
27677 Sep 1996 NZX
27676 Sep 1996 NZX
27675 Sep 1996 NZX
27346 Sep 1996 NZX
205452 Sep 1939 CHX
657 172 Aug 1986 CHX
669 001 Feb 1989 CHX
678160 Dec 1977 SUX
336 Jan 1871 GBX
107 338 Jul 1917 GBX
248234 Dec 1926 GBX
420667 Dec 1934 GBX
536434 Jan 1940 GBX
537153 Jun 1941 GBX
944066 Dec 1963 GBX
970 595 Sep 1964 GBX
1 385 207 Jan 1975 GBX
1 386 088 Mar 1975 GBX
1 477 139 Jun 1977 GBX
2 091 775 Aug 1982 GBX
2 127 872 Apr 1984 GBX
2 213 095 Aug 1989 GBX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (30)
Entry
Aztech Wall System Installation Guide, Block Systems, Inc., (1989).
Besser, Technical Data for the Blockmaker, Besser Research and Training Center, pp. 33 and 34 (1962).
Besser, Concrete Paving Stones, Manual No. 8601 -- Section 5, Besser Company, pp. 1-24.
Besser, Parts and Equipment, Besser Company, pp. 1-80 (before 1990).
Besser Accessories Catalog.
Bulletin 7062, Jul. 1, 1994.
Columbia Machine Mold Descriptions (date unknown).
Creative Alternatives, Block Systems Incorporated, Concrete ideas (1989).
Diamond Block Test Report to University of Wisconsin, Platteville (1990).
Diamond Wall System Installation Guide, Diamond Wall System, Block Systems, Inc. (1989).
Diamond Wall Systems: The Cutting Edge, Anchor Block Co. (date unknown).
EZ Wall Systems Product Literature, Rockwood Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. (date unknown).
Garden Wall Product Literature 1991.
Handy-Stone Retaining Wall System Product Literature (date unknown).
Installation & Design Manual, Rockwood Classic, The one-piece easy to use system, Rockwood Retaining Walls, Inc.
Johnson Block Product Literature (date unknown).
Kawano Cement Brochure (date unknown).
Keystone International Compac Unit Product Literature (1992).
Keystone Retaining Wall Systems Product Literature (1992).
Krehling Industries article, Florida block and r/m plant relies on admixtures. (Date unknown).
Modular Concrete Block, the Besser Co. (date unknown).
Orco Block Co., Split Face Block Product Literature (date unknown).
Paving Stone: New Lock With Old World Charm, the Besser Co. (date unknown).
PISA II, Interlocking Retaining Wall System, Interlock Paving Company, (1988).
Profile HEX Masonry Units literature.
A Review of Paver Production on Besser Block Machines, Lucas E. Pfeiffenberger, pp. 33-37, (1984) (2 parts).
Single-element retaining wall system is ideal for block producers, Robert L. Hubler, Jr., Sep., 1983.
Various Diamond Wall System 4 and 4.4 Concrete Masonry Units Tech Spec's, Anchor Block (1988, 1989).
Versa Lock Product Literature (date unknown).
Windsor Stone Product Literature, Block Systems, Inc. (1991).