Process for producing methacrylic acid

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for producing methacrylic acid by vapor phase oxidation of methacrolein. It relates more specifically to a process for producing methacrylic acid by catalytic vapor phase oxidation of methacrolein in the presence of isobutylene and/or tertiary butanol.
It has been known that methacrylic acid can be prepared in two stages from isobutylene or tertiary butanol by the oxidation of isobutylene or tertiary butanol to methacrolein over a proper catalyst and the successive oxidation of methacrolein to methacrylic acid over another catalyst. Many processes and catalysts for each or both stages have been proposed, but industrial practice of this process has not yet been attained in contrast to the process for producing acrylic acid by similar catalytic oxidation of propylene. The reason is considered to be mainly due to the difficulty in the oxidation of methacrolein to methacrylic acid. That is, the yield of methacrylic acid is not so high compared to that of acrylic acid in the oxidation of acrolein, the life of the catalyst is too short to maintain its activity for a long term and the like.
One of the inventors of the present application tried to improve such disadvantages in the oxidation step of methacrolein, found the catalysts having heteropolyacid structure or mixed structure of heteropolyacid and heteropolyacid salt that contain Mo, V, P, O plus additional elements have very long catalyst life and give methacrylic acid in very high yield, and proposed some processes (U.S. Pat. No. 4,172,051, etc.)
The inventors accomplished this invention by finding that the coexistence of isobutylene or tertiary butanol increases the yield of methacrylic acid in the catalytic vapor phase oxidation of methacrolein.
This invention relates to a process for producing methacrylic acid by oxidizing methacrolein under the coexistence of isobutylene or tertiary butanol with molecular oxygen or molecular oxygen-containing gas in the vapor phase over a catalyst having the following general formula:
Mo.sub.a V.sub.b P.sub.c X.sub.d Y.sub.e O.sub.f
wherein Mo, V, P and O represent molybdenum, vanadium, phosphorus and oxygen, respectively, X represents one or more elements selected from the group consisting of copper, tin, thorium, germanium, nickel, iron, cobalt, zinc, titanium, lead, rhenium, zirconium, cerium, bismuth and arsenic, Y represents one or more elements selected from the group consisting of potassium, rubidium, cesium and thallium and a, b, c, d, e and f represent the atomic ratio of the elements where
a is 10,
b is a number of 6 or less than 6 excluding 0 and preferably, 0.5 to 3,
c is a number of 0.5 to 6 and preferably, 0.5 to 3,
d is a number of 3 or less than 3 excluding 0 and preferably, 0.01 to 1,
e is a number of 0 to 3 and preferably, 0.01 to 1.5,
f is a number determined depending on the valency and atomic ratio of other elements and is usually a number of 32 to 80.
The preferred components of X include copper, arsenic, tin, germanium, nickel, rhenium, zirconium, cerium and bismuth. The most preferred catalysts are those which contain both copper and arsenic.
As mentioned above, this invention is based on the discovery of the preferred effect of isobutylene or tertiary butanol that its coexistence increases the yield of methacrylic acid in the vapor phase oxidation of methacrolein over the specified catalysts.
As described in Japanese Patent Laying-Open Publication No. 111017/75, No. 48609/76 etc., isobutylene has been thought to have undesirable effect on the catalyst performance of heteropolyacid or its salt of molybdenum containing phosphorus as the central atom. Therefore, for the synthesis of methacrylic acid from isobutylene via methacrolein, the process which comprises the separation and purification of methacrolein before its oxidation has been proposed.
It is an object of this invention to provide a novel method for the production of methacrylic acid by catalytic vapor phase oxidation of methacrolein wherein the coexistence of isobutylene or tertiary butanol in the feed increases the yield of methacrylic acid, but as an additional effect of this invention, the effluent gas containing methacrolein obtained by the catalytic oxidation of isobutylene or tertiary butanol can be used as the feed of methacrolein oxidation process without separating unreacted isobutylene in the two stage oxidation of isobutylene or tertiary butanol to methacrylic acid via methacrolein.
The novel effect of this invention can only be attained when the specified catalysts mentioned above are used. The catalyst of this invention can be prepared by generally known methods for preparing usual oxide catalysts or catalysts having heteropoly acid structure or heteropoly acid salt structure.
There is no limitation to select starting materials for the preparation of the catalyst and various materials can be used. Possible starting materials for molybdenum include molybdenum oxide, molybdic acid, phosphomolybdic acid, ammonium molybdate etc.; those for vanadium include vanadium oxide, ammonium vanadate etc.; those for phosphorus include phosphoric acid, phosphorus acid, phosphorus pentoxide, etc,; those for X and Y include their nitrates, sulfates, carbonates, organic acid salts, halides, hydroxides, oxides, etc.
The catalyst of this invention can be prepared, for example, by reacting the starting materials for the constituent elements in water or in an organic solvent under heating, evaporating to dryness and if necessary, calcining the dried product. In case calcination is required, the calcination temperature is preferably in the range of 200.degree.-500.degree. C. and more preferably in the range of 250.degree.-430.degree. C.
Though the catalyst of this invention shows high catalytic activity without being supported on any carriers, preferable effects such as improvements in thermal stability and catalyst life and increase in the yield of methacrylic acid can be expected by supporting it on a suitable carrier. Preferred carriers include silicon carbide, fused alumina, .alpha.-alumina, aluminum powder, diatomaceous earth, titanium oxide and the like.
From the point of view of the structure of the catalyst, the preferred catalyst in this invention is one which has heteropoly acid structure or mixed structure of heteropoly acid and heteropoly acid salt. The basic structure of the catalyst is phosphovanadomolybdic acid and other additional elements are considered to be fixed in the structure of the heteropoly acid by partly replacing its constituent elements and contribute to the improvement in catalytic activity and selectivity as well as in the stability of the structure. The catalyst having such heteropoly acid structure or mixed structure of heteropoly acid and heteropoly acid salts has very long catalyst life. The heteropoly acid structure can be identified by the characteristic X ray diffraction peaks observed at 2.theta.=8.0.degree., 8.9.degree., 9.3.degree., etc. In the case of mixed structure of heteropoly acid and heteropoly acid salt, X ray diffraction peaks at 2.theta.=26.6.degree., 10.8.degree., etc. characteristic for heteropoly acid salt can also be observed in addition to the peaks of heteropoly acid.
The catalyst having heteropoly acid structure or mixed structure of heteropoly acid and heteropoly acid salt can be readily prepared by general methods for preparing heteropoly acid or heteropoly acid salt, but it should be noted to avoid the formation of heteropoly acid ammonium salt in the resultant catalyst. Particularly preferred methods include those such as dispersing or dissolving the starting materials, for example, phosphoric acid and oxides or phosphates of the constituent elements into water, reacting the same under heating, removing insoluble component, if necessary, and then evaporating the solution to dryness or reacting phosphovanadomolybdic acid with oxides, hydroxides, phosphates, carbonates and the like of the remaining components.
In practicing the invention, isobutylene or tertiary butanol is added to the feed preferably in the range of 0.1-30% based on mole fraction of methacrolein and isobutylene or tertiary butanol and desirable effects can be expected especially in the range of 1-10%. It should be noted that isobutylene and tertiary butanol added are partly converted to methacrylic acid. However, even if all of isobutylene or tertiary butanol were assumed to be converted to methacrylic acid, though impossible, the yield of methacrylic acid from methacrolein is still estimated to be higher than in the reaction without isobutylene or tertiary butanol. This fact gives the evidence of the increase in selectivity of methacrylic acid from methacrolein with coexistence of isobutylene or tertiary butanol.
In the process of this invention, isobutylene or tertiary butanol may be added to the feed containing methacrolein, which is then introduced to the reactor or the effluent gas containing methacrolein and isobutylene obtained by the catalytic oxidation of isobutylene or tertiary butanol may be used as the feed of this invention. In the latter case the amount of isobutylene in the effluent gas can be adjusted by controlling the conversion of isobutylene.
The amount of molecular oxygen in the feed of this invention will generally be between 0.5 to 20 moles, preferably 1 to 10 moles of oxygen per mole of methacrolein and isobutylene or tertiary butanol added. It is preferable for smooth reaction to add 1 to 20 moles of steam per mole of methacrolein and isobutylene or tertiary butanol to the feed. The reactant feed may further contain other inert gases, for example, nitrogen, carbon oxides, saturated hydrocarbons and the like.
The reaction of this invention is carried out at temperatures of preferably 250.degree. to 400.degree. C. and more preferably 250.degree. to 360.degree. C. The pressure is preferably around atmospheric, but may be superatmospheric or subatmospheric, if desired. The preferred pressure is 1 to 5 atm. The space velocity may vary from about 100 to 6000 hr.sup.-1 (NTP) and preferably from 500 to 3000 hr.sup.-1.

In the examples no particular references are made to the details of oxygen in the catalyst composition since they are determined in accordance with the atomic ratio and valency of other elements.
Conversion (Conv.) selectivity (Select.) and yield are defined as follows: ##EQU1##
EXAMPLE 1
100 g of molybdenum trioxide, 6.3 g vanadium pentoxide, 1.1 g of copper oxide and 8.0 g of orthophosphoric acid were dispersed or dissolved in 1000 ml of deionized water. The resultant mixture was boiled and refluxed with stirring for about 6 hours to produce a clear orange red solution. After removing a slight amount of insoluble contents, it was evaporated to dryness on a hot bath. The dried products thus obtained (catalyst) had a composition: Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 and was confirmed to be heteropoly acid by the observation of X-ray diffraction peaks at 2.theta.=8.0.degree., 8.9.degree., 9.3.degree. and the like. The catalyst was ground to 24-48 mesh and 10 ml of it was packed in a tubular reactor made of pyrex glass of 18 mm in inside diameter and the reactor was immersed in a fluidized bath. A gaseous mixture composed of 0.475 l/hr of methacrolein, 0.025 l/hr of isobutylene, 1.5 l/hr of oxygen, 8.0 l/hr of nitrogen and 5.0 l/hr of steam was introduced into the reactor and subjected to oxidation reaction. The result is shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLES 2-15
1.1 g of copper oxide in Example 1 was replaced in each of the examples with 1.6 g of tin oxide, 3.7 g of thorium oxide, 1.4 g of germanium oxide, 1.0 g of nickel oxide, 1.1 g of iron oxide, 1.1 g of cobalt oxide, 1.1 g of zinc oxide, 1.1 g of titanium oxide, 3.2 g of trilead tetroxide, 3.4 g of rhenium oxide, 1.7 g of zirconium oxide, 2.4 g of cerium oxide, 3.2 g of bismuth oxide and 1.9 g of arsenic acid respectively and dried products (catalysts) having compositions as shown in Table 1 were obtained. Then the oxidation reactions were carried out using the above catalysts under the same reaction conditions as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 1.
All of the dried products (catalysts) were confirmed to be heteropoly acid by the observation of X-ray diffraction peaks at 2.theta.=8.0.degree., 8.9.degree., 9.3.degree. and the like.
EXAMPLES 16-22
The dried products (catalysts) as shown in Table 1 were prepared under identical conditions as in Example 1. The oxidation reactions were carried out using the above catalysts under the same reaction conditions as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 1.
These catalysts were confirmed to be heteropoly acid by the observation of X-ray diffraction peaks at 2.theta.=8.0.degree., 8.9.degree., 9.3.degree. and the like.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1-22
The procedures of Examples 1-22 were repeated except that isobutylene was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 1.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1'-22'
The procedures of Examples 1-22 were repeated except that methacrolein was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 1.
The flow rate of methacrylic acid produced in Example 1 is higher than sum of those in separative oxidation of methacrolein and isobutylene (Comparative Example 1 and 1'), which verifies the effect of the coexistence of isobutylene. The same comparison was done in all examples to show the effect.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ Flow Rate of MAA Flow Rate (l/hr) RT Conv. Select. Yield formedCatalyst Composition MAL IB (.degree.C.) (%) (%) (%) (l/hr)__________________________________________________________________________E 1 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 94.5 78.8 74.5 0.373CE 1 " 0.475 0 " 95.0 75.9 72.1 0.342CE 1' " 0 0.025 " 90.0 67.2 60.5 0.015E 2 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Sn.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 93.8 75.0 70.4 0.352CE 2 " 0.475 0 " 94.3 73.3 69.1 0.328CE 2' " 0 0.025 " 88.7 65.1 57.7 0.014E 3 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Th.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 325 93.0 75.4 70.1 0.351CE 3 " 0.475 0 " 93.8 73.5 68.9 0.327CE 3' " 0 0.025 " 88.3 65.5 57.8 0.014E 4 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Ge.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 325 93.5 75.5 70.6 0.353CE 4 " 0.475 0 " 93.7 75.0 70.3 0.334CE 4' " 0 0.025 " 89.5 65.0 58.2 0.015E 5 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Ni.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 92.8 76.1 70.6 0.353CE 5 " 0.475 0 " 93.5 74.5 69.7 0.331CE 5' " 0 0.025 " 86.5 64.5 55.8 0.014E 6 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Fe.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 92.5 77.9 72.1 0.361CE 6 " 0.475 0 " 93.2 76.0 70.8 0.336CE 6' " 0 0.025 " 88.8 65.5 58.2 0.015E 7 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Co.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 91.1 77.4 70.5 0.353CE 7 " 0.475 0 " 92.1 74.4 68.5 0.325CE 7' " 0 0.025 " 86.1 64.9 55.9 0.014E 8 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Zn.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 92.9 75.5 70.1 0.351CE 8 " 0.475 0 " 94.0 73.1 68.7 0.326CE 8' " 0 0.025 " 86.9 63.5 55.2 0.014E 9 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Ti.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 325 94.3 76.1 71.8 0.359CE 9 " 0.475 0 " 95.1 74.7 71.0 0.337CE 9' " 0 0.025 " 89.1 64.1 57.1 0.014E 10 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Pb.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 92.5 76.8 71.0 0.355CE 10 " 0.475 0 " 92.8 74.5 69.1 0.328CE 10' " 0 0.025 " 88.7 62.1 55.1 0.014E 11 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Re.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 93.1 77.1 71.8 0.359CE 11 " 0.475 0 " 93.5 75.1 70.2 0.333CE 11' " 0 0.025 " 85.2 62.8 53.5 0.013E 12 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Zr.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 94.0 75.9 71.3 0.357CE 12 " 0.475 0 " 95.1 73.6 70.0 0.333CE 12' " 0 0.025 " 87.8 63.2 55.5 0.014E 13 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Ce.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 325 93.1 77.3 72.0 0.360CE 13 " 0.475 0 " 93.7 75.2 70.5 0.335CE 13' " 0 0.025 " 86.6 65.9 57.1 0.014E 14 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Bi.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 93.1 76.0 70.8 0.354CE 14 " 0.475 0 " 94.0 73.1 68.7 0.326CE 14' " 0 0.025 " 87.9 63.4 55.7 0.014E 15 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 As.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 94.1 76.5 72.0 0.360CE 15 " 0.475 0 " 94.5 74.6 70.5 0.335CE 15' " 0 0.025 " 87.0 65.5 57.0 0.014E 16 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 As.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 93.0 86.0 80.0 0.400CE 16 " 0.475 0 " 93.4 83.6 78.1 0.371CE 16' " 0 0.025 " 85.2 70.1 59.7 0.015E 17 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 Sn.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 93.8 82.1 77.0 0.385CE 17 " 0.475 0 " 94.5 79.5 75.1 0.357CE 17' " 0 0.025 " 90.1 64.6 58.2 0.015E 18 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 Ge.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 95.0 80.1 76.1 0.381CE 18 " 0.475 0 " 95.5 78.0 74.5 0.354CE 18' " 0 0.025 " 89.1 67.2 59.9 0.015E 19 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 Ce.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 92.5 80.5 74.5 0.373CE 19 " 0.475 0 " 93.8 78.7 73.8 0.351CE 19' " 0 0.025 " 87.5 65.4 57.2 0.014E 20 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 Zr.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 95.0 81.2 77.1 0.386CE 20 " 0.475 0 " 95.7 78.9 75.5 0.359CE 20' " 0 0.025 " 91.0 65.4 59.5 0.015E 21 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Ni.sub.0.2 As.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 93.3 78.8 73.5 0.368CE 21 " 0.475 0 " 94.1 77.5 72.9 0.0346CE 21' " 0 0.025 " 85.1 63.6 54.1 0.014E 22 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Ge.sub.0.1 Sn.sub.0.1 0.475 0.025 330 94.1 77.0 72.5 0.363CE 22 " 0.475 0 " 95.3 74.6 71.1 0.338CE 22' " 0 0.025 " 86.0 63.7 54.8 0.014__________________________________________________________________________ In this Table and in Tables 2-5, E represents Example, Ce represents Comparative Example, MAL represents methacrolein, IB represents isobutylene, RT represents reaction temperature, MAA represents methacrylic acid and TBA represents tertiary butanol.
EXAMPLE 23
100 g of molybdenum trioxide, 6.3 g of vanadium pentoxide, 1.1 g of copper oxide and 8.0 g of orthophosphoric acid were dispersed or dissolved in 1000 ml of deionized water and after about 3 hours of heating and stirring of the mixture, 0.45 g of potassium hydroxide was added to the resultant solution. The mixture was refluxed for about 1 hour. The aqueous solution thus formed was evaporated to dryness on a water bath. The composition of the dried product (catalyst) was Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 K.sub.0.1.
In the X-ray diffraction pattern of the catalyst, diffraction peaks of 2.theta.=8.0.degree., 8.9.degree., 9.3.degree., etc. due to heteropoly acid mainly composed of phosphovanadomolybdic acid and faint diffraction peaks of 2.theta.=26.6.degree., 10.8.degree., etc. due to the potassium salt of the heteropoly acid were recognized. The fact shows that the catalyst obtained is a mixture of heteropoly acid mainly composed of phosphovanadomolybdic acid and its potassium salt.
The oxidation reaction was carried out using the above catalyst under the same reaction conditions as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 2.
EXAMPLES 24-30
The catalysts as shown in Table 2 were prepared as in Example 23. The oxidation reactions were carried out using the above catalysts under the same reaction conditions as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 2.
In the X-ray diffraction pattern of the catalysts, diffraction peaks of 2.theta.=8.0.degree., 8.9.degree., 9.3.degree., etc. due to heteropoly acid mainly composed of phosphovanadomolybdic acid and faint diffraction peaks of 2.theta.=26.6.degree., 10.8.degree., etc. due to the salt of the heteropoly acid were recognized. The fact shows that each of the catalysts is a mixture of the heteropoly acid mainly composed of phosphovanadomolybdic acid and its salt.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 23-30
The procedures of Examples 23-30 were repeated except that isobutylene was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 2.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 23'-30'
The procedures of Examples 23-30 were repeated except that methacrolein was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________ Flow Rate of MAA Flow Rate (l/hr) RT Conv. Select. Yield formedCatalyst Composition MAL IB (.degree.C.) (%) (%) (%) (l/hr)__________________________________________________________________________E 23 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 K.sub.0.1 0.475 0.025 310 94.5 79.4 75.0 0.375CE 23 " 0.475 0 " 95.1 78.7 74.8 0.355CE 23' " 0 0.025 " 89.1 68.2 60.8 0.015E 24 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 Rb.sub.0.1 0.475 0.025 310 91.5 79.6 72.8 0.364CE 24 " 0.475 0 " 91.9 78.7 72.3 0.343CE 24' " 0 0.025 " 87.7 67.3 59.1 0.015E 25 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 Cs.sub.0.1 0.475 0.025 310 94.0 79.3 74.5 0.373CE 25 " 0.475 0 " 94.3 78.6 74.1 0.352CE 25' " 0 0.025 " 89.0 67.6 60.2 0.015E 26 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 Tl.sub.0.1 0.475 0.025 310 92.0 79.3 73.0 0.365CE 26 " 0.475 0 " 92.3 78.8 72.7 0.345CE 26' " 0 0.025 " 89.5 66.3 59.3 0.015E 27 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 As.sub.0.2 K.sub.0.1 0.475 0.025 310 92.0 88.2 81.1 0.406CE 27 " 0.475 0 " 92.3 85.8 79.2 0.376CE 27' " 0 0.025 " 88.5 68.9 61.0 0.015E 28 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Ge.sub.0.1 Sn.sub.0.1 Cs.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 330 93.2 76.1 70.9 0.355CE 28 " 0.475 0 " 94.1 73.9 69.5 0.330CE 28' " 0 0.025 " 87.2 66.4 57.9 0.014E 29 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 As.sub.0.2 K.sub.0.3 0.475 0.025 310 90.9 89.0 80.9 0.405CE 29 " 0.475 0 " 91.5 86.3 79.0 0.375CE 29' " 0 0.025 " 88.9 67.9 60.4 0.015E 30 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Sn.sub.0.2 K.sub.1.0 0.475 0.025 350 93.5 68.4 64.0 0.320CE 30 " 0.475 0 " 94.2 67.1 63.2 0.300CE 30' " 0 0.025 " 85.3 59.8 51.0 0.013__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES 31-35
The catalysts having the composition shown in Table 3 were prepared by operating as in Example 1. Using the so obtained catalysts, the oxidation reactions were carried out under the identical conditions as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 3.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 31-35
The procedures of Examples 31-35 were repeated except that isobutylene was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 3.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 31'-35'
The procedures of Examples 31-35 were repeated except that methacrolein was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 3.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________ Flow Rate of MAA Flow Rate (l/hr) RT Conv. Select Yield formedCatalyst Composition MAL IB (.degree.C.) (%) (%) (%) (l/hr)__________________________________________________________________________E 31 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.5 0.475 0.025 310 93.5 73.9 69.1 0.346CE 31 " 0.475 0 " 94.0 72.3 68.0 0.323CE 31' " 0 0.025 " 89.1 60.6 54.0 0.014E 32 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.1.0 0.475 0.025 300 93.1 70.4 65.5 0.328CE 32 " 0.475 0 " 93.8 68.2 64.0 0.304CE 32' " 0 0.025 " 88.1 57.9 51.0 0.013E 33 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.3 Cu.sub.0.3 0.475 0.025 320 94.1 74.6 70.2 0.351CE 33 " 0.475 0 " 94.5 73.5 69.5 0.330CE 32' " 0 0.025 " 87.0 63.2 55.0 0.014E 34 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.0.5 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 310 92.1 75.7 69.7 0.349CE 34 " 0.475 0 " 93.1 74.1 69.0 0.328CE 34' " 0 0.025 " 85.0 62.4 53.0 0.013E 35 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.2 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 As.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 320 93.5 83.6 78.2 0.391CE 35 " 0.475 0 " 93.8 82.1 77.0 0.366CE 35' " 0 0.025 " 90.1 64.5 58.1 0.015__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES 36-38
Using the catalyst prepared as in Example 16, the oxidation reactions were carried out in a similar manner as in Example 1 but varying the flow rate of isobutylene. The results are shown in Table 4.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 36-38
The procedures of Examples 36-38 were repeated except that isobutylene was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 4.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 36'-38'
The procedures of Examples 36-38 were repeated except that methacrolein was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________ Flow Rate of MAA Flow Rate (l/hr) RT Conv. Select. Yield formedCatalyst Composition MAL IB O.sub.2 N.sub.2 H.sub.2 O (.degree.C.) (%) (%) (%) (l/hr)__________________________________________________________________________E 36 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 As.sub.0.2 0.49 0.01 1.5 8.0 5.0 320 93.5 85.0 79.5 0.398CE 36 " 0.49 0 1.5 8.0 5.0 " 93.7 83.5 78.2 0.383CE 36' " 0 0.01 1.5 8.0 5.0 " 87.1 68.3 59.5 0.006E 37 " 0.45 0.05 1.5 8.0 5.0 325 93.0 85.5 79.5 0.398CE 37 " 0.45 0 1.5 8.0 5.0 320 95.5 82.2 78.5 0.353CE 37' " 0 0.05 1.5 8.0 5.0 325 88.8 68.1 60.5 0.030E 38 " 0.35 0.15 1.5 8.0 5.0 330 94.0 78.2 73.5 0.368CE 38 " 0.35 0 1.5 8.0 5.0 320 94.1 82.9 78.0 0.273CE 38' " 0 0.15 1.5 8.0 5.0 330 89.2 67.4 60.1 0.090__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES 39-41
Using the catalysts prepared as in Example 1, 16 and 27, the oxidation reactions were carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that tertiary butanol was introduced into the reactor instead of isobutylene. The results are shown in Table 5.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 39-41
The procedures of Examples 39-41 were repeated except that tertiary butanol was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 5.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 39'-41'
The procedures of Examples 39-41 were repeated except that methacrolein was not introduced into the reactor. The results are shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________ Flow Rate of MAA Flow Rate (l/hr) RT Conv. Select. Yield formedCatalyst Composition MAL TBA O.sub.2 N.sub.2 H.sub.2 O (.degree.C.) (%) (%) (%) (l/hr)__________________________________________________________________________E 39 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 1.5 8.0 5.0 320 94.3 79.0 74.5 0.373CE 39 " 0.475 0 1.5 8.0 5.0 " 95.0 75.9 72.1 0.342CE 39' " 0 0.025 1.5 8.0 5.0 " 90.5 67.2 60.8 0.015E 40 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 As.sub.0.2 0.475 0.025 1.5 8.0 5.0 320 93.3 86.0 80.2 0.401CE 40 " 0.475 0 1.5 8.0 5.0 " 93.4 83.6 78.1 0.371CE 40' " 0 0.025 1.5 8.0 5.0 " 85.5 69.9 59.8 0.015E 41 Mo.sub.10 V.sub.1 P.sub.1 Cu.sub.0.2 As.sub.0.2 K.sub.0.1 0.475 0.025 1.5 8.0 5.0 310 92.3 88.3 81.5 0.408CE 41 " 0.475 0 1.5 8.0 5.0 " 92.3 85.8 79.2 0.376CE 41' " 0 0.025 1.5 8.0 5.0 " 88.7 69.0 61.2 0.015__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 42
The procedure of Example 39 was repeated respectively using the same catalyst as those used in Examples 2-15, 17-26 and 28-30.
In all cases, almost same results were obtained as in Examples 2-15, 17-26 and 28-30 and the effect of coexistence of tertiary butanol was observed.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
4178464	Sakamoto et al.	Dec 1979
4467113	Matsumoto et al.	Aug 1984

Process for producing methacrylic acid

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (1)

Parent Case Info

US Referenced Citations (2)

Continuations (1)