Process for producing methyl formate

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4319037
  • Patent Number
    4,319,037
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 31, 1978
    45 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 9, 1982
    42 years ago
Abstract
A process for producing methyl formate which comprises dehydrogenating methanol in vapor phase in the presence as a catalyst of copper and at least one element selected from the group consisting of elements of Group IIIA (including the rare earths) of the periodic table, of Group IVA and of the actinides is disclosed.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for producing methyl formate which comprises dehydrogenating methanol in vapor phase.
A process for producing methyl formate which comprises dehydrogenating methanol in the presence of a certain catalyst is known. For example, copper (French Pat. No. 673,337), catalyst obtained by reducing oxides of copper, nickel, chrome and iron (U.S. Pat. No. 1,400,195) and catalyst obtained by treating copper-aluminum alloy with an aqueous alkaline solution (U.S. Pat. No. 2,504,497) were known as such catalysts. However, these patents do not disclose the yield of methyl formate obtained. I have found that when methanol is dehydrogenated in the presence of copper, methyl formate can not be obtained with excellent selectivity.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention has been proposed for overcoming such shortcoming in the prior art.
Therefore, an object of this invention is to provide a process for producing methyl formate from methanol with high selectivity.
This invention relates to a process for producing methyl formate by dehydrogenating of methanol in the vapor phase in the presence as a catalyst of copper and at least one element selected from the group consisting of elements of Group IIIA (including the rare earth elements) of the periodic table, elements of Group IVA of the periodic table and actinide elements; and more specifically to said process wherein the copper component in the catalyst is the one obtained by baking basic copper carbonate.
The periodic table employed in the present invention is the one given in THE ELEMENTS OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, written by Samuel Glasstone, published by D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
In the catalyst components employed in the present invention, the atomic ratio of copper to the elements of Group IIIA (including the rare earths), the elements of Group IVA or actinide elements may be in the range of from about 1:0.01 to about 1:2, preferably from about 1:0.05 to about 1:1.
Examples of Group IIIA include scandium, yttrium, lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, samarium, promethium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutecium. Examples of the elements of Group IVA include titanium, zirconium and hafnium. Examples of actinides include thorium, protactinium, uranium, neptunium, plutonium and americium.
A process for producing the catalyst composed of copper and other element(s) is not critical. Conveniently, the catalyst may be prepared from compounds, such as hydroxides, oxides, carbonates, an inorganic acid salt or an organic acid salt containing copper and other element(s). The catalyst may also be prepared from a mixture of compounds containing copper and a compound containing other element(s). Preferably, the catalyst is prepared from a mixture of basic copper carbonate and a carbonate of other element(s). Water is added to the mixture of the compound containing copper and the compound containing other element(s) to form a paste, and thereafter a uniform mixture can be formed by kneading the paste. Alternatively, the catalyst can be formed by coprecipitation. The preparing operation is as follows: The mixture of the compound containing copper and the compound containing other elements is dried, and is baked at a temperature as high as about 400.degree. C. in an atmosphere of air or nitrogen and then is reduced in a stream of H.sub.2 or CO at 200.degree. C. to activate the resulting catalyst.
The dehydrogenating of methenol is carried out by contacting the catalyst with methanol in vapor phase to produce methyl formate. The reaction conditions depend on the kind of the catalysts employed. Conveniently, the reaction temperature may be in the range from about 100.degree. C. to about 400.degree. C., preferably from about 150.degree. C. to about 300.degree. C.; and space velocity may be in the range of from about 100 hr.sup.-1 to about 50,000 hr.sup.-1, preferably from about 500 hr.sup.-1 to about 30,000 hr.sup.-1 ; and the reaction may be carried out at an atmospheric pressure, a superpressure or a reduced pressure. About 0.1 mol to about 2 mol of a dilution gas, such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide or nitrogen which is non active to the reaction may be present in the reaction system per 1 mol of methanol. When methyl formate is produced from methanol, selectivity to methyl formate is relative to conversion of methanol. It is preferred to maintain the conversion of methanol at less than 60% in order to keep the selectivity to methyl formate high. When the yield of methyl formate is considered, it is preferred to maintain the conversion of methanol at more than 10%.
When methyl formate is produced by dehydrogenating methanol, the catalysts employed in the present invention give superior results to copper catalyst in respect of the selectivity to methyl formate.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following Examples. However, this invention should not be limited by these examples, and the changes and modification within the spirit and scope of this invention can be effected.
Parts and percent are by weight in the following Examples, unless otherwise specified.





EXAMPLE 1
Each of 1 mol of reagent grade (GR) copper nitrate and 1.17 mol of reagent grade (GR) anhydrous sodium carbonate was dissolved in 1l of deionized water separately, and two of the solutions were heated to 70.degree. C. and were mixed with each other with strong stirring, and the resulting mixture was stirred while maintaining it at 70.degree. C. for one and half hours. The resulting mixture was allowed to stand for one hour with stirring. The precipitate was suction-filtered from the mixture. The resulting cake was sufficiently washed with deionized water and was dried at 70.degree. C. overnight.
Each of titanium oxide, zirconium carbonate, lanthanum oxide and yttrium oxide was added to 70 g of the resulting basic copper carbonate powder so that the atomic ratio of copper to titanium, zirconium, lanthanum or yttrium amounted to 1:0.1. Water was added to each mixture to form a paste. The pastes were blended and kneaded by a kneader for 30 minutes, and were allowed to stand at 70.degree. C. overnight. The resulting dried mixtures were crushed to particles of 2 to 5 mm size. The particles were baked at 390.degree. C. for one and half hours in air. 3 Percent of graphite was added to each mixture on the basis of the baked mixture. The mixtures were shaped to tablets having 6 mm in diameter and 5 mm high. The tablets were crushed to 1/8 size. The resulting particles containing copper compound and other element compound were charged in a pyrex glass pipe having 20 mm inner diameter, and were maintained at 200.degree. C. for 6 hrs in a stream of hydrogen to reduce these compounds, separately.
Reactors having 20 mm inner diameter were filled with 10 ml of each of the activated catalysts and methanol vapor was charged at a space velocity of 3500 hr.sup.-1 from one edge of the reactor. The reaction was carried out at an atmospheric pressure at each temperature as given in Table 1. The results are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1______________________________________ Yield ofFurther catalyst Conversion Selectivity methylcomponent Reaction of methanol to methyl formateadded to copper temp. .degree.C. % formate % %______________________________________ 160 15.2 96.1 14.6Titanium 181 29.0 86.9 25.2 202 40.7 72.9 29.7 180 24.8 94.3 23.4 198 35.0 87.1 30.5Zirconium 219 45.2 78.8 35.6 242 52.9 73.6 38.9 169 18.3 96.1 17.6 180 26.0 94.6 24.6 194 30.7 93.1 28.6Lanthanum 211 37.4 89.2 33.4 226 43.7 85.1 37.2 243 49.5 79.4 39.3 179 23.0 94.2 21.7Yttrium 198 34.0 88.0 29.9 219 43.6 77.6 33.8______________________________________
EXAMPLE 2
The catalyst employed was the copper-lanthanum prepared in Example 1. The dehydrogenating reaction of Example 1 was repeated except that 0.13 mol of hydrogen or carbon monoxide coexisted in 1 mol of methanol, and the space velocity was 3750 hr.sup.-1. The results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2______________________________________ Reaction Conversion Selectivity Yield ofCo-existing temperature of methanol to methyl methylgas .degree.C. % formate % formate %______________________________________ 170 17.2 97.0 16.7 180 24.4 95.1 23.2H.sub.2 195 29.4 93.0 27.3 213 35.3 88.8 31.3 226 39.2 86.3 33.8 173 19.3 97.0 18.7 181 27.8 94.3 26.2CO 195 32.0 92.8 29.7 210 39.5 89.3 35.2 225 46.5 85.5 39.7______________________________________
EXAMPLE 3
The dehydrogenating reaction of Example 1 was repeated using copper-lanthanum catalyst except that the space velocity was changed as shown in Table 3. The results are shown in Table 3.
TABLE 3______________________________________Space velocity Reaction Conversion Selectivity Yield ofof methanol tempera- of methanol to methyl methylvapor hr.sup.-1 ture .degree.C. % formate % formate %______________________________________ 139 5.9 95.5 5.6 150 16.5 92.3 15.2500 164 21.9 90.0 19.7 180 27.7 85.2 23.6 200 28.6 78.8 22.5 170 17.5 96.3 16.8 182 26.8 94.0 25.2 195 31.4 94.1 29.51,000 214 36.6 89.9 32.9 225 42.6 86.3 36.8 245 48.2 80.5 38.8 169 18.3 96.1 17.6 180 26.0 94.6 24.6 194 30.8 93.1 28.63,500 211 37.4 89.2 33.4 226 43.7 85.1 37.2 243 49.5 79.4 39.3 200 25.4 95.0 24.1 215 30.7 93.1 28.67,000 230 38.1 88.7 33.8 245 43.5 84.7 36.8 260 49.7 78.5 39.0 218 25.8 95.3 24.6 233 30.1 93.6 28.210,000 249 38.2 89.7 34.3 265 43.8 85.1 37.3 280 48.5 81.5 39.5______________________________________
EXAMPLE 4
The dehydrogenating reaction of Example 1 was repeated using copper-zirconium catalyst, except that the atomic ratio of copper to zirconium was changed as shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4______________________________________Atomic ratio Reaction Conversion Selectivity Yield ofof copper to tempera- of methanol to methyl methylzirconium ture .degree.C. % formate % formate %______________________________________1:0.01 162 21.4 93.9 20.1 179 31.8 81.2 25.81:0.1 180 24.8 94.3 23.4 198 35.0 87.1 30.5 219 45.2 78.8 35.6 242 52.9 73.6 38.91:0.5 196 22.4 94.7 21.2 220 36.7 93.8 34.4 241 41.7 93.4 38.9 258 45.4 93.2 42.3 275 48.7 92.1 44.8 300 54.2 87.1 47.3______________________________________
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
The procedure of Example 3 was repeated except that the catalyst was Raney copper sold by Kawaken Fine Chemical Co. The results are shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5______________________________________Space velocity Reaction Conversion Selectivity Yield ofof methanol tempera- of methanol to methyl methylvapor hr.sup.-1 ture .degree.C. % formate % formate %______________________________________2,170 224 23.7 75.8 17.9 243 35.9 64.0 23.07,700 242 17.7 71.0 12.6 270 30.3 50.7 15.3 291 41.0 28.9 11.8______________________________________
EXAMPLE 5
Each of cerium carbonate, neodymium carbonate, samarium oxide, thorium compound (precipitate obtained by adding sodium carbonate solution to thorium nitrate solution) and uranyl nitrate was added to 70 g of the basic copper carbonate powder obtained in Example 1 so that the atomic ratio of copper to cerium, neodymium, samarium, thorium or uranium amounted to 1:0.1. Water was added to each mixture to form a paste. The pastes were blended and kneaded by a kneader for 30 minutes, and were allowed to stand at 70.degree. C. overnight. The resulting dried mixtures were crushed to particles of 2 to 5 mm size. The particles were baked at 390.degree. C. for one and half hours in air. 3 Percent of graphite was added to each mixture on the basis of the baked mixture. The mixture was shaped to tablets having 6 mm in diameter and 5 mm high. The pellets were crushed to 1/8 size. The resulting particles containing copper compound and other element compounds were charged in a pyrex glass pipe having 20 mm inner diameter, and were maintained at 200.degree. C. for 6 hrs in a stream of hydrogen to reduce these compounds.
Reactors having 20 mm inner diameter were filled with 10 ml of the activated catalysts, and methanol vapor was charged at space velocity of 3500 hr.sup.-1 from one edge of the reactor. The reaction was carried out at an atmospheric pressure at each temperature as given in Table 6. The results are shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6______________________________________Other metal Reaction Conversion Selectivity Yield ofadded to tempera- of methanol to methyl methylcopper ture .degree.C. % formate % formate %______________________________________Cerium 183 26.4 90.3 23.8 201 33.6 85.2 28.6 222 38.8 81.7 31.7 242 43.4 74.6 32.4Neodymium 189 30.8 92.9 28.6 210 41.0 87.2 35.8 229 49.6 80.0 39.6 245 55.7 70.6 39.3Samarium 184 31.6 92.5 29.2 205 40.4 85.7 34.7 224 49.0 80.0 39.2 243 56.5 70.3 39.7Thorium 147 11.6 94.2 10.9 159 21.7 89.1 19.3 171 31.6 74.9 23.7Uranium 170 22.8 93.5 21.3 188 31.2 88.5 27.6 212 40.8 82.6 33.7______________________________________
EXAMPLE 6
The procedure of Example 5 was repeated using copper-cerium catalyst except that 0.13 mol of hydrogen or carbon monoxide coexisted in 1 mol of methanol, and the space velocity was 3750 hr.sup.-1. The results are shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7______________________________________ Reaction Conversion Selectivity Yield ofCo-existing tempera- of methanol to methyl methylgas ture .degree.C. % formate % formate %______________________________________H.sub.2 180 24.6 91.6 22.5 200 31.8 86.2 27.4 221 36.4 83.6 30.5 243 41.5 76.3 31.6CO 182 26.8 91.5 24.5 202 34.2 86.8 29.7 220 40.2 83.7 33.6 241 45.5 75.7 34.5______________________________________
EXAMPLE 7
The procedure of Example 5 was repeated using copper-cerium catalyst except that the space velocity was changed as shown in Table 8.
TABLE 8______________________________________Space velocity Reaction Conversion Selectivity Yield ofof methanol tempera- of methanol to methyl methylvapor hr.sup.-1 ture .degree.C. % formate % formate %______________________________________500 153 17.4 92.0 16.0 175 25.5 88.7 22.6 196 32.0 80.4 25.71,000 180 25.5 90.3 23.0 202 32.6 85.7 27.9 220 37.8 82.6 31.2 243 41.9 75.7 32.13,500 183 26.4 90.3 23.8 201 33.5 85.2 28.6 222 38.8 81.7 31.7 242 43.4 74.6 32.47,000 220 31.6 91.7 29.0 241 36.2 87.6 31.7 263 38.6 85.6 33.1 280 43.8 80.2 35.210,000 240 32.0 92.5 29.6 265 36.0 89.6 32.2 282 39.6 86.7 34.3 301 44.5 82.4 36.7______________________________________
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
The procedure of Example 7 was repeated except that the catalyst was Raney copper sold by Kawaken Fine Chemical Co. The results are shown in Table 9.
TABLE 9______________________________________Space velocity Reaction Conversion Selectivity Yield ofof methanol tempera- of methanol to methyl methylvapor hr.sup.-1 ture .degree.C. % formate % formate %______________________________________2,170 224 23.7 75.8 17.9 243 35.9 64.0 23.07,700 242 17.7 71.0 12.6 270 30.3 50.7 15.3 291 41.0 28.9 11.8______________________________________
Claims
  • 1. A process for producing methyl formate comprising dehydrogenating methanol in the vapor phase in the presence of a catalyst obtained by baking in air a mixture of (i) basic copper carbonate and (ii) at least one compound containing at least one element selected from the group consisting of an element of Group IIIA (including the rare earth elements) of the periodic table, an element of Group IVA of the periodic table and an actinide element, the atomic ratio of copper to said other element in said catalyst being from about 1.0:0.01 to about 1:2, followed by heating in a reducing atmosphere comprising hydrogen or carbon monoxide at a temperature sufficient to reduce and thereby to activate the catalyst.
  • 2. The process as defined in claim 1 wherein the dehydrogenation is carried out in the presence of an inert gas.
  • 3. The process as defined in claim 1 wherein the dehydrogenation is carried out at a space velocity of from about 100 hr.sup.-1 to about 50,000 hr.sup.-1.
  • 4. The process as defined in claim 1 wherein the dehydrogenation is carried out at a temperature of from about 100.degree. C. to about 400.degree. C.
  • 5. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and titanium.
  • 6. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and zirconium.
  • 7. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and lanthanum.
  • 8. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and yttrium.
  • 9. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and cerium.
  • 10. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and neodymium.
  • 11. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and samarium.
  • 12. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and thorium.
  • 13. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of said copper and uranium.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
51-43294 Apr 1976 JPX
51-51868 May 1976 JPX
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 786,408, filed Apr. 11, 1977, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
1400195 Wilkie Dec 1921
2136613 Guinot Nov 1938
2504497 Charles et al. Apr 1950
2522676 Harton Sep 1950
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
673337 Jan 1930 FRX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Asakawa et al., Catalyst, vol. 4, No. 4 (1962), 375-379.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 786408 Apr 1977