Patent Grant
11168441
The present invention relates to a process for producing modified polyvinyl alcohol film or fabric having a surface layer which is coalesced and has a surface porosity at a low desired level, more particularly, the process relates to applying heat and pressure to the film or fabric so as to increase the moisture on the surfaces which is held by the film or fabric and to coalesce the surface fibers and reduce the porosity of the surface.
The prior art has recognizes uses for polyvinyl alcohol compositions in the manufacture of water soluble useful articles. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,413,229 which is incorporated herein by reference, teaches the production of water soluble bags or pouches for which packets or the like are produced containing such materials as detergents, bleaches, insecticides, medicinals, chemicals, dyes, pigments, industrial additives and other materials. It is taught that the contents of the packets are dispersed merely by dropping the packets into water whereupon the bags dissolve and release their contents into aqueous dispersions. However, the referenced patent teaches the production of such films which are both hot and cold water soluble.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,859,125, which is incorporated herein by reference, teaches the production of layered articles which include coatings of polyvinyl alcohol. The subject reference teaches coating polyvinyl alcohol on a paper membrane whereby it is taught that the coated paper is soluble in either high or low temperature water. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 4,343,133 teaches the coating of polyvinyl alcohol onto a non-woven fiber sheet impregnated with lattices of polyvinyl acetate in the manufacture of a pre-moistened towelette which can be disposed of by flushing in plain water without danger of clogging a plumbing system.
Both U.K. Patent No. 1,187,690 and Japanese Patent No. 72041741, which are incorporated herein by reference, teach the production of stand alone polyvinyl alcohol films which are water soluble. The U.K. patent teaches the production of hospital bags and packaging material for such products as detergents and agricultural chemicals while the Japanese patent teaches the use of polyvinyl alcohol films to make laundry bags which dissolve releasing soiled garments contained therein. However, neither reference teaches the unique films of the present invention which can be configured into useful garments and like materials.
The process comprises passing a film of polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH) having a moisture content of at least 5-10% through a pair of calender rolls with a heated calender role to provide increased moisture at the surface of the PVOH film to coalesce the surface and lower its porosity.
Advantageously, the unheated opposing calender roll has a softer surface than that of the heated calender roll.
According to a further embodiment of the invention both calender rolls can be heated so that both surface of the PVOH film are coalesced and have a reduced porosity.
It is a general object of the invention to provide a process for modifying at least one surface of a PVOH film based on the moisture content on its surface so to alter the surface and provide a reduced porosity.
It is another object of the invention to provide a process for lowering the surface porosity of spunlaced non woven PVOH fabric while not detracting from its other desirable properties such as strength and abrasion resistance.
It is a further object of the invention to modify a surface of a PVOH non woven fabric by controlling the moisture content of the non woven PVOH fabric before processing it through a heated calender roll.
These and other objects and advantages will be noted by a reading of the Preferred Embodiments of the invention and the drawing.
The fabric contains at least 5-10% by weight water under normal indoor conditions when received and is maintained in this state. These conditions are normal air conditioned/relative humidity in most modern mills. There needs to be certain the percentage of contained moisture in order to achieve repeatable results under consistent process settings as the fabric is hot calendered. This moisture content of at least 5-10% is sufficient to reproducibly provide increased moisture at the surface of the PVOH film or fabric so that the hot calender roll with pressure forces the coalescing of the surface fibers to restrict the surface porosity to the low desired level. No steam is required or extra water is required under these conditions to achieve the degree of coalescing of the fibers and the lowering of the porosity.
In order to make the process less susceptible to changes in the fabric moisture content, the calender rolls should be composed of a heated metal roll, preferably steel, and an unheated counter roll with a surface coated or covered with an appropriate high melting hard tough polymer film such as silicone rubber polyamide, Teflon or polyurethane. The surface of this polymer film or coating will result in a wider nip print resulting in an increased contact area between the heated metal and coated rolls. The increased contact between the two rolls will result in increased contact between the heated roll and the fabric which will improve the heat and pressure transfer of moisture to the surface of the fabric. Additionally, by employing a softer, unheated opposing or counter roll will result in a small difference in the differential stretch between the two sides of the fabric which improves the quality (controlled reduced porosity) of the film formation on both sides of the fabric surface. The softness of the coated roll can be altered to change the stretch differential of the surface of the fabric and the reduced porosity obtained of the fabric, and to modify the properties of the resulting processed fabric. In essence each film coating on the roll and the thickness of that coating will determine a different foot print on the surface of the PVOH fabric surface.
Variations in the process can be readily and practically accomplished by heating both rolls, by heating and coating both rolls, by using the preferred configuration of heating the uncoated steel roll alone and not heating the opposing coated roll, and varying the pressure and varying the line speed. The process is very flexible and small adjustments in line speed, roll pressure, roll temperature and diameter of the rolls allow for variations in moisture content of the PVOH fabric and allows fine tuning of the porosity of both of the fabric surfaces to achieve the desired air permeation properties.
Once the PVOH fabric exits from the calender roll, it must be quickly cooled so as not to disturb low porosity surface film which has been formed. The fabric is preferentially passed over a chill roll and not distorted until the fabric is cool and the surface has been hardened. Minimum tension is used after the calender roll.
Further variation can be accomplished by increasing the moisture content of the initial fabric by conditioning the fabric in a humid environment so that the moisture content is greater than the 5-10% by weight of water which it normally contains, for example, about 11-15%. To modify the surface on the other side, the fabric from the take-up roll can be reversed and passed a second time through the apparatus.
The initial fabric to be treated can comprise polyvinyl alcohol or it can be laminated with another thermoplastic such as a polyolefin, preferably, polyethylene.
Polymer or sheet materials useful in practicing the present method comprise polyvinyl alcohol with or without acetyl groups, cross-linked or uncross-linked. The garments are comprised of polyvinyl alcohol homopolymer that has been highly crystallized by post drawing or heat annealing. Ideal for use in the present invention would be a highly crystallized, at least approximately 98% saponified polyvinyl acetate. Commercially, polyvinyl alcohol sold under the trademark Vinex 1003™ and 1002 ™ by Air Products could be used herein. Useful fibers are typically 0.4 to 7 mils. A commercially available product for use in the present invention is either type T-B (VEE 1290) or type T-5 (VPB 101) which are each available from Kuralon as its PVA fiber. This material is sold in 44 mm lengths. The T-B product is sized at 1.2 denier while the T-5 product is sold in 38 mm staple lengths of 1.5 denier.
The fabric useful in practicing the present invention can be constructed by any well known technique for making woven, non-woven, knitted or otherwise formed fabric. Such non-woven techniques useful in practicing the present invention include spun bonding, melt blowing or wet laying, hydro entangling with cold water and/or thermally bonding with 30-70% of the surface melted to form. When products are configured of sheets of suitable thermoplastic material, the sheets are approximately 1 to 6 mils in thickness and more preferably 1 to 3 mils in thickness and most preferably approximately 1.5 mils in thickness. Suitable non-woven fabric or sheets are approximately from 15 g/yd2 to 200 g/yd2 in weight and more preferably from 20 g/yd2 to 70 g/yd2 and most preferably from 25 g/yd2 to 80 g/yd2.
As noted previously, polymer or sheet material useful in practicing the present invention is comprised of polyvinyl alcohol with or without acetyl groups, cross-linked or uncross-linked. It is proposed that the polyvinyl alcohol be substantially fully hydrolyzed, that is, having 98% or greater hydrolyzed acetyl groups.
For the sake of adequate mechanical strength, in some cases the polyvinyl alcohol-based sheet material should have a degree of polymerization of at least 700 and no greater than approximately 1500. Ideally, such materials should have a degree of polymerization of approximately 900 and be substantially crystallized.
To enhance the manufacture of suitable polyvinyl alcohol resin-based materials, suitable quantities of a plasticizer may be necessary. It is contemplated that up to 15% (wt.) of a suitable plasticizer such as glycerin or polyethylene glycol may be employed to assist in providing a smooth melt extrusion from the polyvinyl alcohol-based pellets.
It was found that the manufactured fabric for use as disposable medical garments displayed nearly identical physical properties similar to fabric manufactured from polyethylene, polyester and polypropylene. However, the fabric manufactured was unaffected by cool or warm water (23°-37° C.) but when exposed to hot water (80°-90° C.), immediately dissolved.
The incorporation of a water repellent on or within the polyvinyl alcohol film or fabric is quite a useful adjunct to minimize surface attack by liquid moisture at a temperature lower than that at which solubility occurs. It has been found that even with polyvinyl alcohol films and fabrics which become water soluble only at elevated temperatures, when exposed to water, the surface of such material tends to take on a slick “feel” and the use of water repellents tends to minimize this effect. Suitable repellents include fluorocarbons offered by the 3M Co. sold under its trademarks FC 824 and 808. These materials are useful in the range of between 0.1 to 2.0% (wt.) based on the weight of the polyvinyl alcohol polymer.
Antimicrobial agents can add to the surface particularly for medical applications such as gowns, drapes, etc. Antimicrobials include GERM PATROL® sold by Germ Patrol, LLC, silanes, silver or copper antimicrobials, and the like.
As shown in
To modify the other surface of the PVOH fabric the process can be run a second time or the apparatus can be modified by providing a heated roller for the other side.
The following Example is merely illustrative of the invention and modifications are within those skilled in the art.
A series of trial runs were made using a 600 mm rolls of PVOH having a length of 600 mm with a thickness which varied at 0.52 mm to 0.45 mm with an outside moisture reading of 6.50%.
Tests 5 and 6 were run on the same apparatus and tests 8 and 9 were run on the same apparatus.
The results are as follows:
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/533,392, filed Jun. 26, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,797,073, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/135,917, filed Jul. 18, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,293,664, which applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3322593 | Conti | May 1967 | A |
| 3413229 | Bianco et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3856598 | Gregorian et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3859125 | Miller et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3870542 | Ida et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3874964 | Cogliano et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4147844 | Babinsky et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4272851 | Goldstein | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4324827 | Obayashi et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4343133 | Daniels et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4409761 | Bechtel | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4415617 | D'Elia | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4639390 | Shoji | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4713068 | Wang et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4726986 | Cannady et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4731266 | Bonnebat et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4772510 | McClure | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4833010 | Langley | May 1989 | A |
| 4855178 | Langley | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4865903 | Adiletta | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4879165 | Smith | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4920575 | Bartasis et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4924525 | Bartasis | May 1990 | A |
| 4970105 | Smith, Jr. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4981738 | Farnworth et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5002820 | Bolton et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5035941 | Blackburn | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5037700 | Davis | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5061748 | Bolton et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5082721 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5098770 | Paire | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5124208 | Bolton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5151314 | Brown | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5162148 | Boye et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5166007 | Smith et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5236769 | Paire | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5250350 | Tung | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5266167 | Hess | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5491022 | Smith | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5492108 | Smith et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5494720 | Smith et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5496640 | Bolton et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5554667 | Smith et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5667885 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5688577 | Smith et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692935 | Smith | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5763062 | Smith et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5869193 | Langley | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6045900 | Haffner et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6274001 | Mohan | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6302993 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6364980 | Smith et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6638605 | Ankuda, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6671031 | Nishimura | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6803034 | DuVal et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6808791 | Curro et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 7093307 | Smith | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7358295 | Miller et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7718555 | Smith et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7937772 | Smith et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 8293664 | Smith et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 9797073 | Smith | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 20010008695 | Bolton et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20020028876 | Jenkines et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091074 | Wooley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115581 | DuVal et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020155302 | Smith et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164465 | Curro et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003308 | Kashiba et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030044579 | Bolton et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030082445 | Smith et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030082972 | Monfalcome, III et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040096666 | Knox et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121678 | Baldwin, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20060046022 | Bader et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20070172614 | Lee | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080038975 | Weiss et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20090061131 | Monfalcone, III et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090294294 | Feng et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325447 | Austin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100055472 | Bravet et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20150159322 | Smith et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1352710 | Jun 2002 | CN |
| 1187690 | Apr 1970 | GB |
| 1994016585 | Aug 1994 | WO |
| 1994025189 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| 2000058539 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| 2003071012 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| 2004052522 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2013012854 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/135,917. |
| USPTO; Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/135,917. |
| USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 14, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/135,917. |
| PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 7, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/047047. |
| PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 21, 2014 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/047047. |
| USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/317,965. |
| USPTO; Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/317,965. |
| USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 11, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/317,965. |
| EPO; European Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2015 in European Application No. 12814529.9. |
| USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,392. |
| USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,392. |
| USPTO; Final Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,392. |
| USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,392. |
| USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 21, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,392. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180171545 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13533392 | Jun 2012 | US |
| Child | 15792536 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13135917 | Jul 2011 | US |
| Child | 13533392 | US |
