Claims
- 1. A process for producing a styrene polymer molding which comprises heat treating a molding of a crystalline styrene polymer having mainly a syndiotactic configuration and having a crystallinity of more than 10% as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis, said heat treating being carried out at a temperature of 150.degree. to 250.degree. C. for a period of time of 20 seconds to 90 minutes.
- 2. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the heat treatment is carried out under an atmosphere of inert gas.
- 3. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said molding to be subjected to the heat treatment has a crystallinity of 12 to 55% as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.
- 4. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said styrene polymer is a polystyrene homopolymer.
- 5. The process as claimed in claim 2, wherein said styrene polymer is a polystyrene homopolymer.
- 6. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said styrene polymer is a copolymer formed by polymerizing styrene and p-methylstyrene.
- 7. The process as claimed in claim 2, wherein said styrene polymer is a copolymer formed by polymerizing styrene and p-methylstyrene.
- 8. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said styrene polymer is selected from the group consisting of polystyrene, poly(alkylstyrene), poly(halogenated styrene), poly(alkoxystyrene) and polyvinyl benzoate and mixtures thereof.
- 9. The process as claimed in claim 2, wherein said styrene polymer is selected from the group consisting of polystyrene, poly(p-methylstyrene), poly(m-methylstyrene), poly(p-tert-butylstyrene), poly(p-chlorostyrene), poly(m-chlorostyrene), poly(p-fluorostyrene) and a copolymer of styrene and p-methylstyrene.
- 10. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said molding to be subjected to the heat treatment has a crystallinity of at least 12% as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.
- 11. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said molding to be subjected to the heat treatment has a crystallinity of 13 to 50% as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.
- 12. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said molding to be subjected to the heat treatment has a crystallinity of 13% as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.
- 13. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said molding to be subjected to the heat treatment has a crystallinity of 15% as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.
- 14. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said molding to be subjected to the heat treatment has a crystallinity of 16% as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
63-003846 |
Jan 1988 |
JPX |
|
Parent Case Info
This is a division of application Ser. No. 07/960,577 filed Oct. 13, 1992, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,270,442, issued Dec. 14, 1993, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/665,930 filed Mar. 5, 1991 (abandoned), which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/286,372 filed Dec. 19, 1988 (abandoned).
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
3009206 |
Salyer et al. |
Nov 1961 |
|
4680353 |
Ishihara et al. |
Jul 1987 |
|
4824629 |
Seitz et al. |
Apr 1989 |
|
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
0210615 |
Apr 1987 |
EPX |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry |
Neilsen, Mechanical Properties of Polymers . . ., Marcel Dekker, Inc. N.Y., N.Y. (1974) pp. 54-55. |
Ishihara et al, Macromolecules, 1986, 19, 2464-2465. |
Divisions (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
960577 |
Oct 1992 |
|
Continuations (2)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
665930 |
Mar 1991 |
|
Parent |
286372 |
Dec 1988 |
|