The present invention relates generally to processes for producing ethanol and, in particular, to processes for producing ethanol from the hydrogenation of acetic acid.
Ethanol for industrial use is conventionally produced from petrochemical feed stocks, such as oil, natural gas, or coal, from feed stock intermediates, such as syngas, or from starchy materials or cellulose materials, such as corn or sugar cane. Conventional methods for producing ethanol from petrochemical feed stocks, as well as from cellulose materials, include the acid-catalyzed hydration of ethylene, methanol homologation, direct alcohol synthesis, and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Instability in petrochemical feed stock prices contributes to fluctuations in the cost of conventionally produced ethanol, making the need for alternative sources of ethanol production all the greater when feed stock prices rise. Starchy materials, as well as cellulose material, are converted to ethanol by fermentation. However, fermentation is typically used for consumer production of ethanol for fuels or consumption. In addition, fermentation of starchy or cellulose materials competes with food sources and places restraints on the amount of ethanol that can be produced for industrial use.
Ethanol production via the reduction of alkanoic acids and/or other carbonyl group-containing compounds has been widely studied, and a variety of combinations of catalysts, supports, and operating conditions have been mentioned in the literature. During the reduction of alkanoic acid, e.g., acetic acid, other compounds are formed with ethanol or are formed in side reactions. These impurities limit the production and recovery of ethanol from such reaction mixtures. For example, during hydrogenation, esters are produced that together with ethanol and/or water form azeotropes, which are difficult to separate. In addition when conversion is incomplete, unreacted acid remains in the crude ethanol product, which must be removed to recover ethanol.
Therefore, a need remains for improving the recovery of ethanol from a crude product obtained by reducing alkanoic acids, such as acetic acid, and/or other carbonyl group-containing compounds.
In a first embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for recovering ethanol, comprising hydrogenating an acetic acid feed stream in the presence of a catalyst to form a crude ethanol product; separating at least a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first column into a first distillate comprising ethanol, water and ethyl acetate, and a first residue comprising acetic acid; separating at least a portion of the first distillate in a second column into a second distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a second residue comprising ethanol and water; and separating at least a portion of the second residue in a third column into a third distillate comprising ethanol and a third residue comprising water.
In a second embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for recovering ethanol, comprising providing a crude ethanol product comprising ethanol, water, acetic acid, and ethyl acetate; separating the crude ethanol product in a first column into a first distillate comprising ethanol, water and ethyl acetate, and a first residue comprising acetic acid; separating the first distillate in a second column into a second distillate comprising ethyl acetate and a second residue comprising ethanol and water; and separating the second residue in a third column into a third distillate comprising ethanol and a third residue comprising water.
The invention is described in detail below with reference to the appended drawings, wherein like numerals designate similar parts.
The present invention relates to processes for recovering ethanol produced by a hydrogenation process comprising hydrogenating acetic acid in the presence of a catalyst. In particular, the present invention relates to recovering ethanol from a crude ethanol product preferably produced by the hydrogenation process. Embodiments of the present invention beneficially may be used in applications for recovery of ethanol on an industrial scale.
Hydrogenation Process
The hydrogenation of acetic acid to form ethanol and water may be represented by the following reaction:
Suitable hydrogenation catalysts include catalysts comprising a first metal and optionally one or more of a second metal, a third metal or additional metals, optionally on a catalyst support. The first and optional second and third metals may be selected from Group IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB, VIII transitional metals, a lanthanide metal, an actinide metal or a metal selected from any of Groups IIIA, IVA, VA, and VIA. Preferred metal combinations for some exemplary catalyst compositions include platinum/tin, platinum/ruthenium, platinum/rhenium, palladium/ruthenium, palladium/rhenium, cobalt/palladium, cobalt/platinum, cobalt/chromium, cobalt/ruthenium, silver/palladium, copper/palladium, nickel/palladium, gold/palladium, ruthenium/rhenium, and ruthenium/iron. Exemplary catalysts are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,608,744 and U.S. Publication No. 2010/0029995, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional catalysts are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/698,968, entitled “Catalysts for Making Ethanol from Acetic Acid,” filed on Feb. 2, 2010, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In one exemplary embodiment, the catalyst comprises a first metal selected from the group consisting of copper, iron, cobalt, nickel, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium, platinum, titanium, zinc, chromium, rhenium, molybdenum, and tungsten. Preferably, the first metal is selected from the group consisting of platinum, palladium, cobalt, nickel, and ruthenium. More preferably, the first metal is selected from platinum and palladium. When the first metal comprises platinum, it is preferred that the catalyst comprises platinum in an amount less than 5 wt. %, e.g., less than 3 wt. % or less than 1 wt. %, due to the high demand for platinum.
As indicated above, the catalyst optionally further comprises a second metal, which typically would function as a promoter. If present, the second metal preferably is selected from the group consisting of copper, molybdenum, tin, chromium, iron, cobalt, vanadium, tungsten, palladium, platinum, lanthanum, cerium, manganese, ruthenium, rhenium, gold, and nickel. More preferably, the second metal is selected from the group consisting of copper, tin, cobalt, rhenium, and nickel. More preferably, the second metal is selected from tin and rhenium.
If the catalyst includes two or more metals, e.g., a first metal and a second metal, the first metal optionally is present in the catalyst in an amount from 0.1 to 10 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 5 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 3 wt. %. The second metal preferably is present in an amount from 0.1 and 20 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 10 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 5 wt. %. For catalysts comprising two or more metals, the two or more metals may be alloyed with one another or may comprise a non-alloyed metal solution or mixture.
The preferred metal ratios may vary depending on the metals used in the catalyst. In some exemplary embodiments, the mole ratio of the first metal to the second metal is from 10:1 to 1:10, e.g., from 4:1 to 1:4, from 2:1 to 1:2, from 1.5:1 to 1:1.5 or from 1.1:1 to 1:1.1.
The catalyst may also comprise a third metal selected from any of the metals listed above in connection with the first or second metal, so long as the third metal is different from the first and second metals. In preferred aspects, the third metal is selected from the group consisting of cobalt, palladium, ruthenium, copper, zinc, platinum, tin, and rhenium. More preferably, the third metal is selected from cobalt, palladium, and ruthenium. When present, the total weight of the third metal preferably is from 0.05 and 4 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 3 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 2 wt. %.
In addition to one or more metals, the exemplary catalysts further comprise a support or a modified support, meaning a support that includes a support material and a support modifier, which adjusts the acidity of the support material. The total weight of the support or modified support, based on the total weight of the catalyst, preferably is from 75 wt. % to 99.9 wt. %, e.g., from 78 wt. % to 97 wt. %, or from 80 wt. % to 95 wt. %. In preferred embodiments that use a modified support, the support modifier is present in an amount from 0.1 wt. % to 50 wt. %, e.g., from 0.2 wt. % to 25 wt. %, from 0.5 wt. % to 15 wt. %, or from 1 wt. % to 8 wt. %, based on the total weight of the catalyst.
Suitable support materials may include, for example, stable metal oxide-based supports or ceramic-based supports. Preferred supports include silicaceous supports, such as silica, silica/alumina, a Group IIA silicate such as calcium metasilicate, pyrogenic silica, high purity silica, and mixtures thereof. Other supports may include, but are not limited to, iron oxide, alumina, titania, zirconia, magnesium oxide, carbon, graphite, high surface area graphitized carbon, activated carbons, and mixtures thereof.
In the production of ethanol, the catalyst support may be modified with a support modifier. Preferably, the support modifier is a basic modifier that has a low volatility or no volatility. Such basic modifiers, for example, may be selected from the group consisting of: (i) alkaline earth oxides, (ii) alkali metal oxides, (iii) alkaline earth metal metasilicates, (iv) alkali metal metasilicates, (v) Group IIB metal oxides, (vi) Group IIB metal metasilicates, (vii) Group IIIB metal oxides, (viii) Group IIIB metal metasilicates, and mixtures thereof. In addition to oxides and metasilicates, other types of modifiers including nitrates, nitrites, acetates, and lactates may be used. Preferably, the support modifier is selected from the group consisting of oxides and metasilicates of any of sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, scandium, yttrium, and zinc, as well as mixtures of any of the foregoing. Preferably, the support modifier is a calcium silicate, and more preferably calcium metasilicate (CaSiO3). If the support modifier comprises calcium metasilicate, it is preferred that at least a portion of the calcium metasilicate is in crystalline form.
A preferred silica support material is SS61138 High Surface Area (HSA) Silica Catalyst Carrier from Saint-Gobain NorPro. The Saint-Gobain NorPro SS61138 silica contains approximately 95 wt. % high surface area silica; a surface area of about 250 m2/g; a median pore diameter of about 12 nm; an average pore volume of about 1.0 cm3/g as measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry and a packing density of about 0.352 g/cm3 (22 lb/ft3).
A preferred silica/alumina support material is KA-160 (Sud Chemie) silica spheres having a nominal diameter of about 5 mm, a density of about 0.562 g/ml, in absorptivity of about 0.583 g H2O/g support, a surface area of about 160 to 175 m2/g, and a pore volume of about 0.68 ml/g.
As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, support materials are selected such that the catalyst system is suitably active, selective and robust under the process conditions employed for the formation of ethanol.
The metals of the catalysts may be dispersed throughout the support, coated on the outer surface of the support (egg shell) or decorated on the surface of the support.
The catalyst compositions suitable for use with the present invention preferably are formed through metal impregnation of the modified support, although other processes such as chemical vapor deposition may also be employed. Such impregnation techniques are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,608,744, U.S. Publication No. 2010/0029995, and U.S. application Ser. No. 12/698,968, referred to above, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Some embodiments of the process of hydrogenating acetic acid to form ethanol according to one embodiment of the invention may include a variety of configurations using a fixed bed reactor or a fluidized bed reactor, as one of skill in the art will readily appreciate. In many embodiments of the present invention, an “adiabatic” reactor can be used; that is, there is little or no need for internal plumbing through the reaction zone to add or remove heat. In other embodiments, radial flow reactor or reactors may be employed, or a series of reactors may be employed with or with out heat exchange, quenching, or introduction of additional feed material. Alternatively, a shell and tube reactor provided with a heat transfer medium may be used. In many cases, the reaction zone may be housed in a single vessel or in a series of vessels with heat exchangers therebetween.
In preferred embodiments, the catalyst is employed in a fixed bed reactor, e.g., in the shape of a pipe or tube, where the reactants, typically in the vapor form, are passed over or through the catalyst. Other reactors, such as fluid or ebullient bed reactors, can be employed. In some instances, the hydrogenation catalysts may be used in conjunction with an inert material to regulate the pressure drop of the reactant stream through the catalyst bed and the contact time of the reactant compounds with the catalyst particles.
The hydrogenation reaction may be carried out in either the liquid phase or vapor phase. Preferably, the reaction is carried out in the vapor phase under the following conditions. The reaction temperature may range from 125° C. to 350° C., e.g., from 200° C. to 325° C., from 225° C. to 300° C., or from 250° C. to 300° C. The pressure may range from 10 KPa to 3000 KPa (about 1.5 to 435 psi), e.g., from 50 KPa to 2300 KPa, or from 100 KPa to 1500 KPa. The reactants may be fed to the reactor at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of greater than 500 hr−1, e.g., greater than 1000 hr−1, greater than 2500 hr−1 or even greater than 5000 hr−1. In terms of ranges the GHSV may range from 50 hr−1 to 50,000 hr−1, e.g., from 500 hr−1 to 30,000 hr−1, from 1000 hr−1 to 10,000 hr−1, or from 1000 hr−1 to 6500 hr−1.
The hydrogenation optionally is carried out at a pressure just sufficient to overcome the pressure drop across the catalytic bed at the GHSV selected, although there is no bar to the use of higher pressures, it being understood that considerable pressure drop through the reactor bed may be experienced at high space velocities, e.g., 5000 hr−1 or 6,500 hr−1.
Although the reaction consumes two moles of hydrogen per mole of acetic acid to produce one mole of ethanol, the actual molar ratio of hydrogen to acetic acid in the feed stream may vary from about 100:1 to 1:100, e.g., from 50:1 to 1:50, from 20:1 to 1:2, or from 12:1 to 1:1. Most preferably, the molar ratio of hydrogen to acetic acid is greater than 2:1, e.g., greater than 4:1 or greater than 8:1.
Contact or residence time can also vary widely, depending upon such variables as amount of acetic acid, catalyst, reactor, temperature and pressure. Typical contact times range from a fraction of a second to more than several hours when a catalyst system other than a fixed bed is used, with preferred contact times, at least for vapor phase reactions, of from 0.1 to 100 seconds, e.g., from 0.3 to 80 seconds or from 0.4 to 30 seconds.
The raw materials, acetic acid and hydrogen, used in connection with the process of this invention may be derived from any suitable source including natural gas, petroleum, coal, biomass, and so forth. As examples, acetic acid may be produced via methanol carbonylation, acetaldehyde oxidation, ethylene oxidation, oxidative fermentation, and anaerobic fermentation. As petroleum and natural gas prices fluctuate, becoming either more or less expensive, methods for producing acetic acid and intermediates such as methanol and carbon monoxide from alternate carbon sources have drawn increasing interest. In particular, when petroleum is relatively expensive compared to natural gas, it may become advantageous to produce acetic acid from synthesis gas (“syn gas”) that is derived from any available carbon source. U.S. Pat. No. 6,232,352, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, for example, teaches a method of retrofitting a methanol plant for the manufacture of acetic acid. By retrofitting a methanol plant, the large capital costs associated with CO generation for a new acetic acid plant are significantly reduced or largely eliminated. All or part of the syn gas is diverted from the methanol synthesis loop and supplied to a separator unit to recover CO and hydrogen, which are then used to produce acetic acid. In addition to acetic acid, such a process can also be used to make hydrogen which may be utilized in connection with this invention.
Methanol carbonylation processes suitable for production of acetic acid are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,208,624, 7,115,772, 7,005,541, 6,657,078, 6,627,770, 6,143,930, 5,599,976, 5,144,068, 5,026,908, 5,001,259, and 4,994,608, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Optionally, the production of ethanol may be integrated with such methanol carbonylation processes.
U.S. Pat. No. RE 35,377 also incorporated herein by reference, provides a method for the production of methanol by conversion of carbonaceous materials such as oil, coal, natural gas and biomass materials. The process includes hydrogasification of solid and/or liquid carbonaceous materials to obtain a process gas which is steam pyrolized with additional natural gas to form synthesis gas. The syn gas is converted to methanol which may be carbonylated to acetic acid. The method likewise produces hydrogen which may be used in connection with this invention as noted above. U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,111, which discloses a process for converting waste biomass through gasification into synthesis gas as well as U.S. Pat. No. 6,685,754, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In one optional embodiment, the acetic acid fed to the hydrogenation reaction may also comprise other carboxylic acids and anhydrides, as well as acetaldehyde and acetone. Preferably, a suitable acetic acid feed stream comprises one or more of the compounds selected from the group consisting of acetic acid, acetic anhydride, acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate, and mixtures thereof. These other compounds may also be hydrogenated in the processes of the present invention. In some embodiments, the present of carboxylic acids, such as propanoic acid or its anhydride, may be beneficial in producing propanol.
Alternatively, acetic acid in vapor form may be taken directly as crude product from the flash vessel of a methanol carbonylation unit of the class described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,657,078, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. The crude vapor product, for example, may be fed directly to the ethanol synthesis reaction zones of the present invention without the need for condensing the acetic acid and light ends or removing water, saving overall processing costs.
The acetic acid may be vaporized at the reaction temperature, following which the vaporized acetic acid can be fed along with hydrogen in an undiluted state or diluted with a relatively inert carrier gas, such as nitrogen, argon, helium, carbon dioxide and the like. For reactions run in the vapor phase, the temperature should be controlled in the system such that it does not fall below the dew point of acetic acid. In one embodiment the acetic acid may be vaporized at the boiling point of acetic acid at the particular pressure, and then the vaporized acetic acid may be further heated to the reactor inlet temperature. In another embodiment, the acetic acid is transferred to the vapor state by passing hydrogen, recycle gas, another suitable gas, or mixtures thereof through the acetic acid at a temperature below the boiling point of acetic acid, thereby humidifying the carrier gas with acetic acid vapors, followed by heating the mixed vapors up to the reactor inlet temperature. Preferably, the acetic acid is transferred to the vapor by passing hydrogen and/or recycle gas through the acetic acid at a temperature at or below 125° C., followed by heating of the combined gaseous stream to the reactor inlet temperature.
In particular, the hydrogenation of acetic acid may achieve favorable conversion of acetic acid and favorable selectivity and productivity to ethanol. For purposes of the present invention, the term “conversion” refers to the amount of acetic acid in the feed that is converted to a compound other than acetic acid. Conversion is expressed as a mole percentage based on acetic acid in the feed. The conversion may be at least 10%, e.g., at least 20%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70% or at least 80%. Although catalysts that have high conversions are desirable, such as at least 80% or at least 90%, in some embodiments a low conversion may be acceptable at high selectivity for ethanol. It is, of course, well understood that in many cases, it is possible to compensate for conversion by appropriate recycle streams or use of larger reactors, but it is more difficult to compensate for poor selectivity.
Selectivity is expressed as a mole percent based on converted acetic acid. It should be understood that each compound converted from acetic acid has an independent selectivity and that selectivity is independent from conversion. For example, if 50 mole % of the converted acetic acid is converted to ethanol, we refer to the ethanol selectivity as 50%. Preferably, the catalyst selectivity to ethoxylates is at least 60%, e.g., at least 70%, or at least 80%. As used herein, the term “ethoxylates” refers specifically to the compounds ethanol, acetaldehyde, and ethyl acetate. Preferably, the selectivity to ethanol is at least 80%, e.g., at least 85% or at least 88%. Preferred embodiments of the hydrogenation process also have low selectivity to undesirable products, such as methane, ethane, and carbon dioxide. The selectivity to these undesirable products preferably is less than 4%, e.g., less than 2% or less than 1%. More preferably, these undesirable products are not detectable. Formation of alkanes may be low, and ideally less than 2%, less than 1%, or less than 0.5% of the acetic acid passed over the catalyst is converted to alkanes, which have little value other than as fuel.
The term “productivity,” as used herein, refers to the grams of a specified product, e.g., ethanol, formed during the hydrogenation based on the kilograms of catalyst used per hour. A productivity of at least 200 grams of ethanol per kilogram catalyst per hour, e.g., at least 400 grams of ethanol per kilogram catalyst per hour or at least 600 grams of ethanol per kilogram catalyst per hour, is preferred. In terms of ranges, the productivity preferably is from 200 to 3,000 grams of ethanol per kilogram catalyst per hour, e.g., from 400 to 2,500 per kilogram catalyst per hour or from 600 to 2,000 per kilogram catalyst per hour.
In various embodiments, the crude ethanol product produced by the hydrogenation process, before any subsequent processing, such as purification and separation, will typically comprise unreacted acetic acid, ethanol and water. As used herein, the term “crude ethanol product” refers to any composition comprising from 5 to 70 wt. % ethanol and from 5 to 35 wt. % water. In some exemplary embodiments, the crude ethanol product comprises ethanol in an amount from 5 wt. % to 70 wt. %, e.g., from 10 wt. % to 60 wt. %, or from 15 wt. % to 50 wt. %, based on the total weight of the crude ethanol product. Preferably, the crude ethanol product contains at least 10 wt. % ethanol, at least 15 wt. % ethanol or at least 20 wt. % ethanol. The crude ethanol product typically will further comprise unreacted acetic acid, depending on conversion, for example, in an amount of less than 90 wt. %, e.g., less than 80 wt. % or less than 70 wt. %. In terms of ranges, the unreacted acetic acid is preferably from 0 to 90 wt. %, e.g., from 5 to 80 wt. %, from 15 to 70 wt. %, from 20 to 70 wt. % or from 25 to 65 wt. %. As water is formed in the reaction process, water will generally be present in the crude ethanol product, for example, in amounts ranging from 5 to 35 wt. %, e.g., from 10 to 30 wt. % or from 10 to 26 wt. %. Ethyl acetate may also be produced during the hydrogenation of acetic acid or through side reactions and may be present, for example, in amounts ranging from 0 to 20 wt. %, e.g., from 0 to 15 wt. %, from 1 to 12 wt. % or from 3 to 10 wt. %. Acetaldehyde may also be produced through side reactions and may be present, for example, in amounts ranging from 0 to 10 wt. %, e.g., from 0 to 3 wt. %, from 0.1 to 3 wt. % or from 0.2 to 2 wt. %. Other components, such as, for example, esters, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, alkanes, and carbon dioxide, if detectable, collectively may be present in amounts less than 10 wt. %, e.g., less than 6 wt. % or less than 4 wt. %. In terms of ranges, other components may be present in an amount from 0.1 to 10 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 6 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 4 wt. %. Exemplary embodiments of crude ethanol compositional ranges are provided in Table 1.
Purification
Reactor 103 contains the catalyst that is used in the hydrogenation of the carboxylic acid, preferably acetic acid. In one embodiment, one or more guard beds (not shown) may be used to protect the catalyst from poisons or undesirable impurities contained in the feed or return/recycle streams. Such guard beds may be employed in the vapor or liquid streams. Suitable guard bed materials are known in the art and include, for example, carbon, silica, alumina, ceramic, or resins. In one aspect, the guard bed media is functionalized to trap particular species such as sulfur or halogens. During the hydrogenation process, a crude ethanol product stream is withdrawn, preferably continuously, from reactor 103 via line 112. The crude ethanol product stream may be condensed and fed to flasher 106, which, in turn, provides a vapor stream and a liquid stream. The flasher 106 in one embodiment preferably operates at a temperature of from 50° C. to 500° C., e.g., from 70° C. to 400° C. or from 100° C. to 350° C. In one embodiment, the pressure of flasher 106 preferably is from 50 KPa to 2000 KPa, e.g., from 75 KPa to 1500 KPa or from 100 to 1000 KPa. In one preferred embodiment the temperature and pressure of the flasher is similar to the temperature and pressure of the reactor 103.
The vapor stream exiting the flasher 106 may comprise hydrogen and hydrocarbons, which may be purged and/or returned to reaction zone 101 via line 113. As shown in
The liquid from flasher 106 is withdrawn and pumped as a feed composition via line 115 to the side of first column 107, also referred to as the acid separation column. The contents of line 115 typically will be substantially similar to the product obtained directly from the reactor, and may, in fact, also be characterized as a crude ethanol product. However, the feed composition in line 115 preferably has substantially no hydrogen, carbon dioxide, methane or ethane, which are removed by flasher 106. Exemplary components of liquid in line 115 are provided in Table 2. It should be understood that liquid line 115 may contain other components, not listed, such as components in the feed.
0.0005 to 0.05
The amounts indicated as less than (<) in the tables throughout present application are preferably not present and if present may be present in trace amounts or in amounts greater than 0.0001 wt. %.
The “other esters” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, ethyl propionate, methyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, n-propyl acetate, n-butyl acetate or mixtures thereof. The “other ethers” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, diethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, isobutyl ethyl ether or mixtures thereof. The “other alcohols” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, methanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, n-butanol or mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the feed composition, e.g., line 115, may comprise propanol, e.g., isopropanol and/or n-propanol, in an amount from 0.001 to 0.1 wt. %, from 0.001 to 0.05 wt. % or from 0.001 to 0.03 wt. %. In should be understood that these other components may be carried through in any of the distillate or residue streams described herein and will not be further described herein, unless indicated otherwise.
When the content of acetic acid in line 115 is less than 5 wt. %, the acid separation column 107 may be skipped and line 115 may be introduced directly to second column 108, also referred to herein as a light ends column.
In the embodiment shown in
Any of columns 107, 108 or 109 may comprise any distillation column capable of separation and/or purification. The columns preferably comprise tray columns having from 1 to 150 trays, e.g., from 10 to 100 trays, from 20 to 95 trays or from 30 to 75 trays. The trays may be sieve trays, fixed valve trays, movable valve trays, or any other suitable design known in the art. In other embodiments, a packed column may be used. For packed columns, structured packing or random packing may be employed. The trays or packing may be arranged in one continuous column or they may be arranged in two or more columns such that the vapor from the first section enters the second section while the liquid from the second section enters the first section, etc.
The associated condensers and liquid separation vessels that may be employed with each of the distillation columns may be of any conventional design and are simplified in
The temperatures and pressures employed in any of the columns may vary. As a practical matter, pressures from 10 KPa to 3000 KPa will generally be employed in these zones although in some embodiments subatmospheric pressures may be employed as well as superatmospheric pressures. Temperatures within the various zones will normally range between the boiling points of the composition removed as the distillate and the composition removed as the residue. It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that the temperature at a given location in an operating distillation column is dependent on the composition of the material at that location and the pressure of column. In addition, feed rates may vary depending on the size of the production process and, if described, may be generically referred to in terms of feed weight ratios.
When column 107 is operated under standard atmospheric pressure, the temperature of the residue exiting in line 116 from column 107 preferably is from 95° C. to 120° C., e.g., from 105° C. to 117° C. or from 110° C. to 115° C. The temperature of the distillate exiting in line 117 from column 107 preferably is from 70° C. to 110° C., e.g., from 75° C. to 95° C. or from 80° C. to 90° C. In other embodiments, the pressure of first column 107 may range from 0.1 KPa to 510 KPa, e.g., from 1 KPa to 475 KPa or from 1 KPa to 375 KPa. Exemplary components of the distillate and residue compositions for first column 107 are provided in Table 3 below. It should also be understood that the distillate and residue may also contain other components, not listed, such as components in the feed. For convenience, the distillate and residue of the first column may also be referred to as the “first distillate” or “first residue.” The distillates or residues of the other columns may also be referred to with similar numeric modifiers (second, third, etc.) in order to distinguish them from one another, but such modifiers should not be construed as requiring any particular separation order.
As shown in Table 3, without being bound by theory, it has surprisingly and unexpectedly been discovered that when any amount of acetal is detected in the feed that is introduced to the acid separation column (first column 107), the acetal appears to decompose in the column such that less or even no detectable amounts are present in the distillate and/or residue.
Depending on the reaction conditions, the crude ethanol product exiting reactor 103 in line 112 may comprise ethanol, acetic acid (unconverted), ethyl acetate, and water. After exiting reactor 103, a non-catalyzed equilibrium reaction may occur between the components contained in the crude ethanol product until it is added to flasher 106 and/or first column 107. This equilibrium reaction tends to drive the crude ethanol product to an equilibrium between ethanol/acetic acid and ethyl acetate/water, as shown below.
EtOH+HOAc⇄EtOAc+H2O
In the event the crude ethanol product is temporarily stored, e.g., in a holding tank, prior to being directed to distillation zone 102, extended residence times may be encountered. Generally, the longer the residence time between reaction zone 101 and distillation zone 102, the greater the formation of ethyl acetate. For example, when the residence time between reaction zone 101 and distillation zone 102 is greater than 5 days, significantly more ethyl acetate may form at the expense of ethanol. Thus, shorter residence times between reaction zone 101 and distillation zone 102 are generally preferred in order to maximize the amount of ethanol formed. In one embodiment, a holding tank (not shown), is included between the reaction zone 101 and distillation zone 102 for temporarily storing the liquid component from line 115 for up to 5 days, e.g., up to 1 day, or up to 1 hour. In a preferred embodiment no tank is included and the condensed liquids are fed directly to the first distillation column 107. In addition, the rate at which the non-catalyzed reaction occurs may increase as the temperature of the crude ethanol product, e.g., in line 115, increases. These reaction rates may be particularly problematic at temperatures exceeding 30° C., e.g., exceeding 40° C. or exceeding 50° C. Thus, in one embodiment, the temperature of liquid components in line 115 or in the optional holding tank is maintained at a temperature less than 40° C., e.g., less than 30° C. or less than 20° C. One or more cooling devices may be used to reduce the temperature of the liquid in line 115.
As discussed above, a holding tank (not shown) may be included between the reaction zone 101 and distillation zone 102 for temporarily storing the liquid component from line 115, for example from 1 to 24 hours, optionally at a temperature of about 21° C., and corresponding to an ethyl acetate formation of from 0.01 wt. % to 1.0 wt. % respectively. In addition, the rate at which the non-catalyzed reaction occurs may increase as the temperature of the crude ethanol product is increased. For example, as the temperature of the crude ethanol product in line 115 increase from 4° C. to 21° C., the rate of ethyl acetate formation may increase from about 0.01 wt. % per hour to about 0.005 wt. % per hour. Thus, in one embodiment, the temperature of liquid components in line 115 or in the optional holding tank is maintained at a temperature less than 21° C., e.g., less than 4° C. or less than −10° C.
In addition, it has now been discovered that the above-described equilibrium reaction may also favor ethanol formation in the top region of first column 107.
The distillate, e.g., overhead stream, of column 107 optionally is condensed and refluxed as shown in
The first distillate in line 117 is introduced to the second column 108, also referred to as the “light ends column,” preferably in the middle part of column 108, e.g., middle half or middle third. As one example, when a 25 tray column is utilized in a column without water extraction, line 117 is introduced at tray 17. In one embodiment, the second column 108 may be an extractive distillation column. In such embodiments, an extraction agent, such as water, may be added to second column 108. If the extraction agent comprises water, it may be obtained from an external source or from an internal return/recycle line from one or more of the other columns.
Second column 108 may be a tray column or packed column. In one embodiment, second column 108 is a tray column having from 5 to 70 trays, e.g., from 15 to 50 trays or from 20 to 45 trays.
Although the temperature and pressure of second column 108 may vary, when at atmospheric pressure the temperature of the second residue exiting in line 118 from second column 108 preferably is from 60° C. to 90° C., e.g., from 70° C. to 90° C. or from 80° C. to 90° C. The temperature of the second distillate exiting in line 120 from second column 108 preferably is from 50° C. to 90° C., e.g., from 60° C. to 80° C. or from 60° C. to 70° C. Column 108 may operate at atmospheric pressure. In other embodiments, the pressure of second column 108 may range from 0.1 KPa to 510 KPa, e.g., from 1 KPa to 475 KPa or from 1 KPa to 375 KPa. Exemplary components for the distillate and residue compositions for second column 108 are provided in Table 4 below. It should be understood that the distillate and residue may also contain other components, not listed, such as components in the feed.
The weight ratio of ethanol in the second residue to ethanol in the second distillate preferably is at least 3:1, e.g., at least 6:1, at least 8:1, at least 10:1 or at least 15:1. The weight ratio of ethyl acetate in the second residue to ethyl acetate in the second distillate preferably is less than 0.4:1, e.g., less than 0.2:1 or less than 0.1:1. In embodiments that use an extractive column with water as an extraction agent as the second column 108, the weight ratio of ethyl acetate in the second residue to ethyl acetate in the second distillate approaches zero.
As shown, the second residue from the bottom of second column 108, which comprises ethanol and water, is fed via line 118 to third column 109, also referred to as the “product column.” More preferably, the second residue in line 118 is introduced in the lower part of third column 109, e.g., lower half or lower third. Third column 109 recovers ethanol, which preferably is substantially pure other than the azeotropic water content, as the distillate in line 119. The distillate of third column 109 preferably is refluxed as shown in
Any of the compounds that are carried through the distillation process from the feed or crude reaction product generally remain in the third distillate in amounts of less 0.1 wt. %, based on the total weight of the third distillate composition, e.g., less than 0.05 wt. % or less than 0.02 wt. %. In one embodiment, one or more side streams may remove impurities from any of the columns 107, 108 and/or 109 in the system 100. Preferably at least one side stream is used to remove impurities from the third column 109. The impurities may be purged and/or retained within the system 100.
The third distillate in line 119 may be further purified to form an anhydrous ethanol product stream, i.e., “finished anhydrous ethanol,” using one or more additional separation systems, such as, for example, distillation columns (e.g., a finishing column) or molecular sieves.
Returning to second column 108, the distillate in line 120 preferably is refluxed as shown in
Although one reactor and one flasher are shown in
The remaining liquid in flasher 106 is withdrawn via line 134 and fed to a second flasher 106′ to remove any residual vapor that is dissolved in the liquid. Second flasher 106′ may operate at a lower temperature and/or pressure than the first flasher 106. In one embodiment, the temperature of second flasher 106′ preferably is from 20° C. to 100° C., e.g., from 30° C. to 85° C. or from 40° C. to 70° C. In one embodiment, the temperature of second flasher 106′ preferably is at least 50° C. lower than first flasher 106, e.g., at least 75° C. lower or at least 100° C. lower. The pressure of second flasher 106′ preferably is from 0.1 KPa to 1000 KPa, e.g., from 0.1 KPa to 500 KPa or from 0.1 KPa to 100 KPa. In one embodiment, the pressure of second flasher 106′ preferably is at least 50 KPa lower than first flasher 106, e.g., at least 100 KPa lower or at least 200 KPa lower. The vapor stream 135 exiting the second flasher may comprise hydrogen and hydrocarbons, which may be purged and/or returned to the reaction zone in a manner similar to that of the first flasher 106. The remaining liquid in flasher 106′ is withdrawn and pumped via line 115 to the side of the first column (not shown in
Finished Ethanol
The finished ethanol composition obtained by the processes of the present invention preferably comprises from 75 to 96 wt. % ethanol, e.g., from 80 to 96 wt. % or from 85 to 96 wt. % ethanol, based on the total weight of the finished ethanol composition. Exemplary finished ethanol compositional ranges are provided below in Table 6.
The finished ethanol composition of the present invention preferably contains very low amounts, e.g., less than 0.5 wt. %, of other alcohols, such as methanol, butanol, isobutanol, isoamyl alcohol and other C4-C20 alcohols. In one embodiment, the amount of isopropanol in the finished ethanol is from 80 to 1,000 wppm, e.g., from 95 to 1,000 wppm, from 100 to 700 wppm, or from 150 to 500 wppm. In one embodiment, the finished ethanol composition preferably is substantially free of acetaldehyde and may comprise less than 8 wppm of acetaldehyde, e.g., less than 5 wppm or less than 1 wppm.
The finished ethanol composition produced by the embodiments of the present invention may be used in a variety of applications including fuels, solvents, chemical feedstocks, pharmaceutical products, cleansers, sanitizers, hydrogenation transport or consumption. In fuel applications, the finished ethanol composition may be blended with gasoline for motor vehicles such as automobiles, boats and small piston engine aircrafts. In non-fuel applications, the finished ethanol composition may be used as a solvent for toiletry and cosmetic preparations, detergents, disinfectants, coatings, inks, and pharmaceuticals. The finished ethanol composition may also be used as a processing solvent in manufacturing processes for medicinal products, food preparations, dyes, photochemicals and latex processing.
The finished ethanol composition may also be used a chemical feedstock to make other chemicals such as vinegar, ethyl acrylate, ethyl acetate, ethylene, glycol ethers, ethylamines, aldehydes, and higher alcohols, especially butanol. In the production of ethyl acetate, the finished ethanol composition may be esterified with acetic acid or reacted with polyvinyl acetate. The finished ethanol composition may be dehydrated to produce ethylene. Any of known dehydration catalysts can be employed in to dehydrate ethanol, such as those described in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/221,137 and U.S. application Ser. No. 12/221,138, the entire contents and disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. A zeolite catalyst, for example, may be employed as the dehydration catalyst. Preferably, the zeolite has a pore diameter of at least about 0.6 nm, and preferred zeolites include dehydration catalysts selected from the group consisting of mordenites, ZSM-5, a zeolite X and a zeolite Y. Zeolite X is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 2,882,244 and zeolite Y in U.S. Pat. No. 3,130,007, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
In order that the invention disclosed herein may be more efficiently understood, an example is provided below. The following examples describe the various distillation processes of the present invention.
A crude ethanol product comprising ethanol, acetic acid, water and ethyl acetate was produced by reacting a vaporized feed comprising 95.2 wt. % acetic acid and 4.6 wt. % water with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst comprising 1.6 wt. % platinum and 1 wt. % tin supported on ⅛ inch calcium silicate modified silica extrudates at an average temperature of 291° C., an outlet pressure of 2,063 KPa. Unreacted hydrogen was recycled back to the inlet of the reactor such that the total H2/acetic acid molar ratio was 5.8 at a GHSV of 3,893 hr−1. Under these conditions, 42.8% of the acetic acid was converted, and the selectivity to ethanol was 87.1%, selectivity to ethyl acetate was 8.4%, and selectivity to acetaldehyde was 3.5%. The crude ethanol product was purified using a separation scheme having distillation columns as shown in
The crude ethanol product was fed to the first column at a feed rate of 20 g/min. The composition of the liquid feed is provided in Table 7. The first column is a 2 inch diameter Oldershaw with 50 trays. The column was operated at a temperature of 115° C. at atmospheric pressure. Unless otherwise indicated, a column operating temperature is the temperature of the liquid in the reboiler and the pressure at the top of the column is atmospheric (approximately one atmosphere). The column differential pressure between the trays in the first column was 7.4 KPa. The first residue was withdrawn at a flow rate of 12.4 g/min and returned to the hydrogenation reactor.
The first distillate was condensed and refluxed at a 1:1 ratio at the top of the first column, and a portion of the distillate was introduced to the second column at a feed rate of 7.6 g/min. The second column is a 2 inch diameter Oldershaw design equipped with 25 trays. The second column was operated at a temperature of 82° C. at atmospheric pressure. The column differential pressure between the trays in the second column was 2.6 KPa. The second residue was withdrawn at a flow rate of 5.8 g/min and directed to the third column. The second distillate was refluxed at a ratio of 4.5:0.5 and the remaining distillate was collected for analysis. The compositions of the feed, distillates, and residues are provided in Table 7.
Residue from the second column was collected from several runs and introduced above the 25 tray to the third column, a 2 inch Oldershaw containing 60 trays, at a rate of 10 g/min. The third column was operated at a temperature of 103° C. at standard pressure. The column differential pressure between the trays in the third column was 6.2 KPa. The third residue was withdrawn at a flow rate of 2.7 g/min. The third distillate was condensed and refluxed at a 3:1 ratio at the top of the third column, and recovered an ethanol composition as shown in Table 8. The ethanol composition also contained 10 ppm of n-butyl acetate.
A crude ethanol product comprising ethanol, acetic acid, water and ethyl acetate was produced by reacting a vaporized feed comprising 96.3 wt. % acetic acid and 4.3 wt. % water with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst comprising 1.6 wt. % platinum and 1% tin supported on ⅛ inch calcium silicate modified silica extrudates at an average temperature of 290° C., an outlet pressure of 2,049 KPa. Unreacted hydrogen was recycled back to the inlet of the reactor such that the total H2/acetic acid molar ratio was 10.2 at a GHSV of 1,997 hr−1. Under these conditions, 74.5% of the acetic acid was converted, and the selectivity to ethanol was 87.9%, selectivity to ethyl acetate was 9.5%, and selectivity to acetaldehyde was 1.8%. The crude ethanol product was purified using a separation scheme having distillation columns as shown in
The crude ethanol product was fed to the first column at a feed rate of 20 g/min. The composition of the liquid feed is provided in Table 9. The first column is a 2 inch diameter Oldershaw with 50 trays. The column was operated at a temperature of 116° C. at atmospheric pressure. The column differential pressure between the trays in the first column was 8.1 KPa. The first residue was withdrawn at a flow rate of 10.7 g/min and returned to the hydrogenation reactor.
The first distillate was condensed and refluxed at a 1:1 ratio at the top of the first column, and a portion of the distillate was introduced to the second column at a feed rate of 9.2 g/min. The second column is a 2 inch diameter Oldershaw design equipped with 25 trays. The second column was operated at a temperature of 82° C. at atmospheric pressure. The column differential pressure between the trays in the second column was 2.4 KPa. The second residue was withdrawn at a flow rate of 7.1 g/min and directed to the third column. The second distillate was refluxed at a ratio of 4.5:0.5 and the remaining distillate was collected for analysis. The compositions of the feed, distillates, and residues are provided in Table 9.
Residue from the second column was collected from several runs and introduced above the 25 tray to the third column, a 2 inch Oldershaw containing 60 trays, at a rate of 10 g/min. The third column was operated at a temperature of 103° C. at standard pressure. The column differential pressure between the trays in the third column was 6.5 KPa. The third residue was withdrawn at a flow rate of 2.8 g/min. The third distillate was condensed and refluxed at a 3:1 ratio at the top of the third column, and recovered an ethanol composition as shown in Table 10. The ethanol composition also contained 86 ppm of isopropanol and 2.3 ppm of n-propyl acetate.
While the invention has been described in detail, modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. In view of the foregoing discussion, relevant knowledge in the art and references discussed above in connection with the Background and Detailed Description, the disclosures of which are all incorporated herein by reference. In addition, it should be understood that aspects of the invention and portions of various embodiments and various features recited below and/or in the appended claims may be combined or interchanged either in whole or in part. In the foregoing descriptions of the various embodiments, those embodiments which refer to another embodiment may be appropriately combined with other embodiments as will be appreciated by one of skill in the art. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not intended to limit the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/644,734, filed on Oct. 4, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/852,227, filed Aug. 6, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,309,773, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/300,815, filed on Feb. 2, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/332,696, filed on May 7, 2010, the entire contents and disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2021698 | Perkins | Nov 1935 | A |
2105540 | Lazier | Jan 1938 | A |
2607807 | Ford | Aug 1952 | A |
2649407 | Harrison et al. | Aug 1953 | A |
2702783 | Harrison et al. | Feb 1955 | A |
2744939 | Kennel | May 1956 | A |
2801209 | Muller et al. | Jul 1957 | A |
2882244 | Milton | Apr 1959 | A |
3130007 | Breck | Apr 1964 | A |
3383311 | Groszek | May 1968 | A |
3408267 | Miller et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3445345 | Katzen et al. | May 1969 | A |
3478112 | Karl et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3702886 | Argauer et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3729429 | Robson | Apr 1973 | A |
3990952 | Katzen et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4048096 | Bissot | Sep 1977 | A |
4065512 | Cares | Dec 1977 | A |
4228307 | Zimmerschied | Oct 1980 | A |
4270015 | Knifton et al. | May 1981 | A |
4275228 | Gruffaz et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4306942 | Brush et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4317918 | Takano et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4319058 | Kulprathipanja et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4328373 | Strojny | May 1982 | A |
4337351 | Larkins | Jun 1982 | A |
4374265 | Larkins, Jr. | Feb 1983 | A |
4379028 | Berg et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4395576 | Kwantes et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4398039 | Pesa et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4399305 | Schreck et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4421939 | Kiff et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4422903 | Messick et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4443639 | Pesa et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4454358 | Kummer et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4465854 | Pond et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4471136 | Larkins et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4480115 | McGinnis | Oct 1984 | A |
4492808 | Hagen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4497967 | Wan | Feb 1985 | A |
4517391 | Schuster et al. | May 1985 | A |
4520213 | Victor | May 1985 | A |
4521630 | Wattimena et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4541897 | Sommer et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4550185 | Mabry et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4581473 | Polichnowski | Apr 1986 | A |
4600571 | McCarroll et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4613700 | Maki et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4620050 | Cognion et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4626321 | Grethlein et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4678543 | Houben et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4692218 | Houben et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4710086 | Naaktgeboren et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4777303 | Kitson et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4804791 | Kitson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4826795 | Kitson et al. | May 1989 | A |
4842693 | Wheldon | Jun 1989 | A |
4843170 | Isshiki et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4880937 | Matsushita et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4886905 | Larkins, Jr. | Dec 1989 | A |
4902823 | Wunder et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4961826 | Grethlein et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4978778 | Isshiki et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4985572 | Kitson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4990655 | Kitson et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994608 | Torrence et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5001259 | Smith et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5026908 | Smith et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035776 | Knapp | Jul 1991 | A |
5061671 | Kitson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5124004 | Grethlein et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5137861 | Shih et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5144068 | Smith et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149680 | Kitson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155084 | Horn et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5185308 | Bartley et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5185481 | Muto et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5233099 | Tabata et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237108 | Marraccini et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241106 | Inoue et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243095 | Roberts et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250271 | Horizoe et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5270504 | Grohs et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5306845 | Yokohama et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5348625 | Berg | Sep 1994 | A |
5350504 | Dessau | Sep 1994 | A |
5415741 | Berg | May 1995 | A |
5426246 | Nagahara et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437770 | Berg | Aug 1995 | A |
5445716 | Berg | Aug 1995 | A |
5449440 | Rescalli et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5475144 | Watson et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476827 | Ferrero et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
RE35377 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 1996 | E |
5585523 | Weiguny et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599976 | Scates et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5691267 | Nicolau et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5719315 | Tustin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5731456 | Tustin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5767307 | Ramprasad et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770770 | Kim et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5821111 | Gaddy et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5849657 | Rotgerink et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861530 | Atkins et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5945570 | Arhancet et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955397 | Didillon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5973193 | Crane et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993610 | Berg | Nov 1999 | A |
6040474 | Jobson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049008 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6093845 | Van Acker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6114571 | Abel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121498 | Tustin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143930 | Singh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6232352 | Vidalin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232504 | Barteau et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6294703 | Hara et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6375807 | Nieuwoudt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6462231 | Yanagawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472555 | Choudary et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6486366 | Ostgard et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495730 | Konishi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509180 | Verser et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509290 | Vaughn et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6559333 | Brunelle et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6603038 | Hagemeyer et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6627770 | Cheung et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632330 | Colley et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657078 | Scates et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685754 | Kindig et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693213 | Kolena et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6696596 | Herzog et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6723886 | Allison et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727380 | Ellis et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6765110 | Warner et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768021 | Horan et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6809217 | Colley et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812372 | Janssen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852877 | Zeyss et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6903045 | Zoeller et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906228 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927048 | Verser et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7005541 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7074603 | Verser et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084312 | Huber et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7115772 | Picard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7208624 | Scates et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7294604 | Dath et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297236 | Vander Griend et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7341706 | Fuglerud et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351559 | Verser et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375049 | Hayes et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7425657 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7507562 | Verser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7518014 | Kimmich et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7538060 | Barnicki et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553397 | Colley et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7572353 | Vander et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7608744 | Johnston et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7744727 | Blum et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7842844 | Atkins | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7855303 | Johnston et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863489 | Johnston et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884253 | Stites et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8071806 | Johnston et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8309757 | Johnston et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8378153 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425733 | Halvorsen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8501652 | Johnston et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8502001 | Daniel et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524954 | Ditzel et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8669400 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20030013908 | Horan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030077771 | Verser et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030104587 | Verser et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114719 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040195084 | Hetherington et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060019360 | Verser et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060127999 | Verser et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070106246 | Modesitt | May 2007 | A1 |
20070270511 | Melnichuk et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080135396 | Blum | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080207953 | Houssin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080257784 | Dath et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090005588 | Hassan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090014313 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090023192 | Verser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090081749 | Verser et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090166172 | Casey et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221725 | Chornet et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090318573 | Stites et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326080 | Chornet et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016454 | Gracey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100029980 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100029995 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030001 | Chen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030002 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100113843 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121114 | Johnston et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125148 | Johnston et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168493 | Le Peltier et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185021 | Ross et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100196789 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100197485 | Johnston et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100249479 | Berg-Slot et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110004033 | Johnston et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046421 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071312 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082322 | Jevtic et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130217925 | Chornet et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140039205 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0104197 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0137749 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0167300 | Jan 1986 | EP |
0175558 | Mar 1986 | EP |
0192587 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0400904 | May 1990 | EP |
0372847 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0408528 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0456647 | Nov 1991 | EP |
2060553 | May 2009 | EP |
2072487 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2072488 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2072492 | Jun 2009 | EP |
6-116182 | Apr 1994 | JP |
10-306047 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2001-046874 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-157841 | Jun 2001 | JP |
WO 8303409 | Oct 1983 | WO |
WO 2008135192 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009009322 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009009323 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2011053365 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for corresponding Chinese Appl. No. 201180001920.X dated Apr. 9, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/023269 mailed Aug. 5, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/023269 mailed Jun. 27, 2012. |
International Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/023269 mailed May 8, 2012. |
Santori et al.(2000). Hydrogenation of carbonylic compounds on Pt/SiO2 catalysts modified with SnBu4, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 130, 2063-2068. |
ZeaChem, Inc., Technology Overview, Lakewood, Colorado www.zeachem.com, 2008. |
Rachmady, Acetic Acid Reduction by H2 on Bimetallic Pt—Fe Catalysts, Journal of Catalysis 209, 87-98 (Apr. 1, 2002), Elsevier Science (USA). |
Pestman et al., The formation of ketones and aldehydes from carboxylic acids, structure-activity relationship for two competitive reactions, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 103 Jun. 14, 1995, 175-180. |
Pestman et al., Reactions of Carboxylic Acids on Oxides, Journal of Catalysis 168:255-264 (1997). |
Pestman et al., Identification of the Active Sites in the Selective Hydrogenation of Acetic Acid to Acetaldehyde on Iron Oxide Catalysts, Journal of Catalysis 174:142-152 (1998). |
Pallasana et al., Reaction Paths in the Hydrogenolysis of Acetic Acid to Ethanol over Pd(111), Re(0001), and RdRe Alloys, Journal of Catalysis 209, 289-305 Mar. 1, 2002. |
Ordóñez et al., The role of metal and support sites on the hydrogenation of acetic acid on Ru-based catalysts, 21st NAM San Francisco, CA, Jun. 10, 2009. |
Proc. Roy Soc. A314, pp. 473-498 (1970). |
Brunauer Emmett and Teller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 309 (1938). |
Hilmen, Separation of Azeotropic Mixtures: Tools for Analysis and Studies on Batch Distillation Operation (Nov. 2000) p. 17-20. |
Gursahani et al., Reaction kinetics measurements and analysis of reaction pathways for conversions of acetic acid, ethanol, and ethyl acetate over silica-supported Pt, Applied Catalysis A: General 222 (2001) 369-392. |
Amit M. Goda et al., DFT modeling of selective reduction of acetic acid to acetaldehyde on Pt-based bimetallic catalysts, 20th NAM, Houston, TX, Jun. 17-22, 2007 available online at <http://www.nacatsoc.org/20nam/abstracts/O-S9-18.pdf>. |
Alcala, et al., (2005). Experimental and DFT studies of the conversion of ethanol and acetic acid on PtSn-based catalysts, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 109(6), 2074-2085. |
Zheng, et al., (2007). Preparation and catalytic properties of a bimetallic Sn—Pt complex in the supercages of NaY zeolite by use of surface organometallic chemistry, Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 21(10), 836-840. |
Office Action for European Appl. No. 11702768.0 dated Jul. 25, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140128641 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61300815 | Feb 2010 | US | |
61332696 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13644734 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14154326 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12852227 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13644734 | US |