Process for removal of so2 from off-gases by reaction with h2o2

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20060057047
  • Publication Number
    20060057047
  • Date Filed
    December 04, 2003
    20 years ago
  • Date Published
    March 16, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
A process for removal of SO2 in off-gases having a temperature of 30-150° C. and containing 0.001-1 vol % SO2 in which the SO2 is oxidised to H2 SO4 by spraying an aqueous solution of H2O2 into the off-gas upstream of an aerosol filter removing the produced sulphuric acid from the off-gas.
Description

The present invention relates to a process for removal of SO2 from off-gases by reaction with H2O2.


It has been known for more than 30 years that SO2, as described in the publication 2164e from Lurgi/Südchemie AG, August 1989, can be removed from off-gases by contacting the off-gas in an absorption tower with circulating solution of dilute sulphuric acid containing H2O2, whereby SO2 is dissolved and oxidised to H2SO4 in the solution. The circulating solution typically contains 30-60% H2SO4 and 0.1-0.5% H2O2. The absorption is typically carried out at a temperature of 50-80° C. of the circulating solution. H2O2 is added either as a concentrated aqueous solution of H2O2 to the circulating acid, or it is produced by electrolysis of a side stream of the circulating acid. The produced acid is drawn off from the circulating acid.


The known process usually requires installation of a low velocity aerosol filter downstream of the absorption tower to remove sulphuric acid aerosol (acid mist) in order to meet acid mist emission regulations requiring less than about 5 mol ppm H2SO4 in the stack gas. Fine acid mist (aerosol) that may be present in the off-gas is not removed efficiently in the absorption tower. Fine acid mist is also formed in the absorption tower itself by reaction between SO2 and H2O2 vaporised from the absorbing liquid.


It is a disadvantage of the known process that it requires installation of both an absorption tower and a low velocity mist filter.


In the process according to the present invention, SO2 in off-gases is removed by reaction with H2O2 without the use of an absorption tower by spraying a solution of H202 in water or dilute sulphuric acid into the off-gas upstream of a low velocity aerosol filter or wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP).


A preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 1. A solution of 0.1-30% H2O2 in line 1 is sprayed by the spray nozzles 3 into a stream of off-gas in line 2 containing typically between 100-1000 ppm SO2 and having a temperature typically in the range of 50-120° C. The nozzles are placed in duct 4, so that the spray is evenly distributed in the gas stream upstream of the mist filter 5 in which the gas is passed in parallel through a number of low velocity filter candles 6. Even distribution of the droplets in the gas is desirable for the process and the most even distribution of the droplets is achieved by using air-atomising nozzles producing very small droplets. The H2SO4 formed in the process accumulates in the filter elements or candles from which it is drained off through line 7. Most or all of the mass of the droplets evaporate before the gas enters the filter candles, whereby most of the H2O2 evaporates and reacts in the gas phase under formation of sulphuric acid aerosol. However, it is not necessary that the droplets are completely evaporated before the gas enters the filter elements. The reaction between SO2 and H2O2 will be completed and the thermal equilibrium will be established in the mist filter elements without decreasing the efficiency of the SO2-removal.


Thus, the injection of the aqueous solution H2O2, serves two purposes:


Firstly, it adds to the off-gas the amount of H2O2, which is required for achieving the desired conversion of SO2 into H2SO4 by the reaction

H2O2+SO2=H2SO4


Most of the conversion takes place by reaction in the gas phase between SO2 and vaporised H2O2 under formation of acid mist or between SO2 and H2O2 dissolved in the droplets. The reaction is completed in the aerosol filter in which remaining SO2 is absorbed and reacts with remaining H2O2 contained in the dilute sulphuric acid wetting the fibre material.


Secondly, the water comprised in the solution cools off the off-gas in line 2 by evaporation of the droplets, whereby the off-gas is cooled off to a desired temperature of the filter elements or candles typically to a temperature between 50° C. and 70° C. The concentration of H2SO4 in the produced acid will be the equilibrium concentration of H2SO4 at the actual temperature and H2O partial pressure in the gas phase.


Up to 98% SO2-removal can be achieved at, typically, about 95% utilisation of the H2O2.







EXAMPLE

An off-gas stream of 1000 Nm3/h at 100° C. contains 200 ppm SO2+10% H2O and has a temperature of 100° C. 96% SO2 removal is desired. The aerosol filter is designed for operation at maximum 70° C. Operation at 67-70° C. is chosen in order to achieve the highest possible acid strength and low content of remaining H2O2 in the produced acid.


The process is conducted as follows: 15.7 kg/h water containing 2.0 wt % H2O2 is injected into the off-gas, whereby the off-gas is cooled to 65-70° C. in thermal equilibrium. The mist filter is 75 mm thick and has a flow area of 2.5 m2. The diameter of the fibres is about 8 μm. Experiments carried out under these conditions show that about 96% of the SO2 is removed under production of 1.7 kg/h 50% H2SO4 with about 500 ppm H2O2. The treated gas contains less than 2 ppm H2SO4 and the content of H2O2 is below the detection limit.

Claims
  • 1. A process for removal of SO2 in off-gases having a temperature of 30-150° C. and containing 0.001-1 vol % SO2 in which the SO2 is oxidised to H2SO4 by spraying an aqueous solution of H2O2 into the off-gas upstream of an aerosol filter removing the produced sulphuric acid from the off-gas.
  • 2. A process as in claim 1, in which the off-gas is cooled by evaporation of the water comprised in the solution being sprayed into the off-gas upstream of the filter.
  • 3. A process as in claim 1, in which a wet electrostatic separator us used in place of an aerosol filter.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
PA 2002 01992 Dec 2002 DK national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP03/13699 12/4/2003 WO 6/17/2005