The process described in this application stores energy in subterranean water reservoirs as compressed hydrogen or oxygen produced by high-pressure electrolysis. The compressed gas(es) may be used at a later time as an energy source thus storing energy.
The primary utilities of this process are:
This process requires:
The steps in the process are:
It has been shown that it is possible to pump high pressure water into an existing subterranean reservoir, lifting the rock structure above it and using the elevated mass to store gravitational potential energy. While this method does store energy, doing so by raising the rock above the reservoir is far less efficient than storing the same energy as compressed gas. Using compressed gas can be done at constant pressure by displacing water as a closed system.
It is possible to use a subterranean reservoir of any depth, either a natural aquifer, artificial well or a depleted natural gas fracking site. Natural reservoirs range in depth from the surface to 9,000 m and also exist beneath the sea floor. A typical frack ing reservoir is 2,000 m to 6,000 m deep. Since each 10 m of depth produces approximately 1 atmosphere of compression, gas stored by this process could be compressed up to 900 times that of standard atmospheric pressure (900 bar.)
The gas is injected into the reservoir by high pressure electrolysis. One, or both, of the two product gases (H2 and O2) would be stored in the reservoir while unused gas would be released to the surface.
The high pressure gas(es) is released and may be used to drive expansion engines to run generators to produce electricity. The energy stored in the compressed gas(es) is expressed by the equation
E=VP
2ln (P2/P1) Eq 1
Where E is the energy stored, V is the volume of gas stored, P2 is the storage pressure and P1 is atmospheric pressure. Using typical depths of depleted fracking reservoirs E=94 to 330 KWH/cu m when stored as compressed gas and 1,100 to 3,400 KWH/cu m for compressed hydrogen. A typical domestic drilled water well with a depth of 250′ (75 m) would store 1.8 KWH/cu m of compressed gas or 42 KWH/cu m for compressed hydrogen.
The energy equation for the electrolysis of water is
Ee=286 KJ/mol Eq 2
While it is known that the energy required for electrolysis is independent of pressure (Eq 2), utilizing the natural water pressure at great depth and the resulting high pressure gas(es) as a working gas(es) was previously overlooked. This application of known natural phenomena for energy storage is a key innovation of this process.
The energy generated by burning 1 mol of hydrogen with ½ mol of oxygen to yield 1 mol of water is
Ec=257 KJ/mol Eq 3
Ec=0.0714 KWH/mol Eq 3a
1/Ec=14.0 mol/KWH Eq 3b
From Eq 2 and Eq 3, the amount of gasses produced per KWH can be derived
n=keE Eq 4
where
k
e=1.5/Ec=1.5*14.0 mol/KWH Eq 5
The constant of 1.5 accounts for two gasses being produced, 1 mol of H2 and ½ mol of O2.
This formula for n can now be substituted into PV=nRT and solved for E/V to yield
PV=keERT Eq 6
and
E
sp
=E/V=Ec/Ee P/(kcRT)=0.899P/(keRT) Eq 7
Where Esp is the specific energy due to combustion of the gasses.
Since the gas displaces water already in the reservoir, which can be kept at roughly equal head height in the source reservoir, the absolute pressure in the reservoir can be kept relatively constant. This reduces the water circulating in and out of the reservoir to 1.3% to 14% of that used by gravity potential energy storage. Since the pressure is constant, there will be little to no change in height of the rock structure and thus little to no risk of micro-quakes.
If storing the hydrogen gas only, the oxygen can be released into the atmosphere. When the stored hydrogen is released, not only can it be used to drive expansion motors and generators, but the gas can also be burned as fuel. The waste oxygen may be released through the expansion motors and generators to produce additional electricity which may be used to electrolyze more water. This increases the efficiency of the overall process.
If storing the oxygen gas, the hydrogen is used immediately, as above, to run the expansion generators, and burned as fuel, to electrolyze more water. While this method has lower stored energy density, no combustible gas is ever stored in the reservoir. While Hydrogen has less heat of combustion than natural gas (less explosive), the general public has a greater anxiety of being on top of a hydrogen reservoir and thus storing oxygen may be more readily accepted.
The primary benefits of this process are:
Prior art and patents:
The Canadian company Hydrostor is using methods similar to those described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,261,552. They are either licensing this patent or hold a similar foreign patent.
The US company Quidnet is currently developing the geofracture storage approach. Dark Sky Innovative Solutions review of geofracture storage has raised some concerns. In public briefings it's claimed the energy is stored by compression. Since both water and rock are deemed ‘in-compressible’ in engineering texts, it is highly unlikely that they can store significant energy. This is expressed by the formulae
E=½kx2 Eq 8
and
F=kx Eq 9
These can be solved for E as a function of F and k as
E=½F2/k Eq 10
Equation 10 clearly shows that storing energy using force to compress a stiff material is very inefficient for energy storage. It is far more likely that the rock and water are lifted against gravity and act as a gravity battery.
In prior art, the working gas is taken from the atmosphere and pumped underground by force. The pumping step requires a great deal of energy and produces heat which must be recovered or released. This leads to the focus on an adiabatic (zero heat loss) process.
This process eliminates the compression step, replacing it with electrolysis of water into hydrogen and oxygen. This process stores much more energy per cubic meter, is endothermic and provides inherent carbon capture if desired.
These attributes make this process of far more commercial value and value to society and the welfare of the Earth's biosphere.
I, Robert R Tipton, declare that the material of this specification has not been changed.
This patent application is a refinement of provisional patent application #63/143,041 and inherits it's filing date. The refinement is to omit storing gases by compression. This was done because the inventor learned, since the provisional filing, that using direct compression is not a new innovation. The process of compressing atmosphere and storing it in subterranean aquifers was already developed by Hydrostor Canada. This application retains the innovation of using high-pressure electrolysis to generate the compressed gases, bypassing the compression step. The two processes were independent options of the provisional patent application and therefore eliminating gas compression does not violate the electrolysis option of the provisional patent.