Process for texturing materials

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8546458
  • Patent Number
    8,546,458
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 7, 2011
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 1, 2013
    10 years ago
Abstract
Provided are methods for making textured implantable materials made from two part RTV silicone foams and having a desired color or tone without the need for dyes or colorants.
Description

The present invention generally relates to textured materials, and more specifically relates to processes for making textured materials suitable for implantation.


Prostheses or implants for augmentation and/or reconstruction of the human body are well known. Capsular contracture is a complication associated with surgical implantation of prostheses, particularly with soft implants, and even more particularly, though certainly not exclusively, with fluid-filled breast implants.


Capsular contracture is believed to be a result of the immune system response to the presence of a foreign material in the body. A normal response of the body to the presence of a newly implanted object, for example a breast implant, is to form a capsule of tissue, primarily collagen fibers, around the implant. Capsular contracture occurs when the capsule begins to contract and squeeze the implant. This contracture can be discomforting or even extremely painful, and can cause distortion of the appearance of the augmented or reconstructed breast. The exact cause of contracture is not known. However, some factors may include bacterial contamination of the implant prior to placement, submuscular versus subgladular placement, and smooth surface implants versus textured surface implants, and bleeding or trauma to the area.


Surface texturing has been shown to reduce capsular contracture when compared to what are known as “smooth” surface implants. Current texturing techniques generally do not take into account the final color of the implant product.


During consultation with the physician, a patient considering breast reconstruction or augmentation is often shown various representative samples of breast implants. The patient may be provided the opportunity to view and handle the samples. A gel-filled implant may be compared side-by-side with a saline filled implant. Textured implants can be compared to so-called smooth-surface implants.


It is believed by the present inventors that other characteristics of the implant, for example, the tone or look, for example, even the color of a sample, may carry at least some value to a physician and/or patient.


Providing different tones or colors may be important for other reasons, for example, as a means of distinguishing different models or sizes of implants, each from the other.


There is still a need for new ways to manufacture textured materials for breast implants.


SUMMARY

Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of making an implantable, textured material of a desired appearance, specifically, a tone or color, without the use of addition of colorants or dyes. More specifically provided are methods for making textured implantable materials from two part RTV silicone foams and having a desired, preselected color or tone without the need for dyes or colorants.


In one aspect of the invention, the invention provides a process for creating a texture on the surface of materials using gas foaming and more specifically, to creating a texture having aesthetic properties, for example, using gas foaming.


The implantable materials can be made using gas foaming techniques. However, unlike conventional techniques, the present invention provides a means for creating implantable materials, for example, textured implantable materials useful as components of breast implants, which have a preselected tone or color, for example a preselected brown color tone, without the addition of dyes or colorants, using gas foaming techniques. The preselected brown color tone may be a brown tone, including, but not limited to, a brown tone, a buff brown tone and a bronze brown tone.


Generally, a base solution for the gas foam starts as a relatively dark material, and after a catalyst is added it becomes lighter with agitation. The inventors have found that by controlling agitation, subtlety distinct darker or lighter toned materials can be achieved. The present invention provides methods for making implantable materials of a full range of skin tones.


For example, methods of making a material having a preselected color and suitable for implantation generally include the steps of providing a silicone base component, providing a catalyst for the base component, and combining the base component with the catalyst under preselected mixing conditions in order to achieve a polymerized silicone foam material having a preselected color. The preselected color is a color or tone selected from a range of brown color tones, including bronze-brown, buff-brown and brown.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention provides methods of making a textured surface on implantable device, such as a breast implant, having a preselected or desired color or tone. The method generally comprises the steps of providing a silicone base component, providing a catalyst for the base component, combining the base component with the catalyst under preselected conditions in order to achieve a textured silicone material having a preselected color or tone.


In many embodiments of the invention, the method expressly excludes the addition of any colorant, dye or similar agent to achieve the desired color or tone. In some embodiments, the preselected color or tone correlates to a density of the silicone material.


Another advantage of the present invention is textured materials may be formed that promote tissue ingrowth. For example, the texture of the material may be open celled and somewhat crater-like.


Gas foaming involves the use of a mixture of two or more components, of which one is volatile under certain conditions and the other(s) form(s) the foam. Typically in silicone gas foaming a catalyst, a silicone polymer/monomer/oligomer and a foaming agent are used. When mixed in defined proportions the mixture undergoes polymerization and foam formation occurs. Mixing can be done by hand, with a power mixer, or any other standard mixing technique, this mixture can then be used with any other manufacturing process such as injection molding, dipping, casting, etc.


In accordance with an aspect of the invention, density of the foam is lowered, and thus, the tone of the foam may be made relatively lighter by increasing the speed of the agitation and by decreasing the amount of catalyst. Once the solution has been prepared it is poured on top of a base material, for example a silicone elastomer sheet. This surface will be textured by the foam. After polymerization is complete the foam is manually peeled away from the surface of the material. The gas foam solution polymerizes with the top layer of the silicone sheet and binds tightly to it. Excess foam may be removed, for example, by gentle scrubbing, leaving a textured surface layer remains on the base material. The peeling process is facilitated by the mechanical properties of the foam which create a weak-plane such that at least one cell layer remains on the base material. During multiple applications the weak-plane shifts upwards and facilitates the creation of multiple cell layers on the base material. As such, the peeling process of the excess foam is very simple, manual and can be introduced simply into any manufacturing process.


Typically, with the gas foaming technique, the foam forms a layer of skin on the surface. Skin is defined as a layer of porosity which is less than the bulk porosity of the remaining foam. Typically the skin is of sub-optimal porosity, often of no appreciable porosity. This event occurs due to collapse of the polymer at the surface during degassing and often limits the utility of the foam as is. Most manufacturing processes involve cutting off of the skin after the foaming is complete in order to create a foam sheet which is open-celled throughout the material. This greatly limits the geometry of foams produced by these methods. Typical foams are made into thick sheets, fixed to a revolving mandrel and sliced with a blade in a peeling like fashion in order to produce sheets of foam. This method is limited to producing foam in sheet form. The skin formation is undesirable in that it causes the foam to be non homogenous, mainly the skin has an undesirably low level of porosity. The described process allows for the creation of foams in any shape without a skin.


The present texturing process can be performed by dipping any material surface into a gas foaming solution, by pouring the solution on top of the surface, by spraying the solution onto a surface, or by other methods like injection molding. Using this method, the foam can be applied to any surface thereby texturing the target surface with one or more open celled layers.


One advantage of this process is that the gas foam texture can be applied to a surface rapidly. Once the gas foam solution has been prepared it can be applied to the sample surface. The foam only requires a few minutes to polymerize. After the polymerization is complete, the excess is removed and the textured layer remains adhered to the sample surface. The whole process can be performed in only a few minutes.


This process can also be repeated to thicken the layer of foam on the sample surface. Each layer that is added thickens the texture on the surface. Five layers are enough to create an open celled gas foam several millimeters thick on the surface of the sample. Each layer as it is applied polymerizes with the previous layer. When the excess is removed the layers remain. Due to this, multiple foam layers can be stacked upon each other to create the desired thickness for the sample. The porosity and density of each layer can also be altered by varying the agitation that the gas foam solution is mixed at. This can be used to create foams that have small pores at the proximity to the material being coated and gradually progress to larger pores with each additional layer. Alternatively a mix of small-large pore layers can be created; alternatively the pores on the material surface can be very big, decreasing in size with the application of each consecutive layer.


This process can also be used with surfaces of any geometry including surfaces which have already been textured by other means. For example the proposed technique can be applied to the Biocell surface to enhance the surface roughness. For this the sample first undergoes treatment to make the standard Biocell texture, followed by dipping the cured silicone shell in the gas foaming solution as described in the current invention.


Factors which can be varied in the current invention in order to achieve different results include: the amount of catalyst used, temperature of reactants, the intensity of stirring, the gas foam solution used, and how the sample is handled after the gas foam solution has been applied. The amount of catalyst used affects the porosity of the resulting foam, more catalyst increases porosity. In this manner the foam layer that is applied to the surface can be of varying geometries, starting out with small pores and going to large pores, or starting out with large pores and going to small pores, or of alternating pore sizes with each consecutive layer, etc. The catalyst also affects the working time required for the foam to harden. This affects the mechanical properties of the foam, such as elasticity and elongation at break. Typically, the more catalyst used, the worse the mechanical properties are. Controlling the temperature of the reactants affects the working time which affects the mechanical properties. Cooling the reactants increases the working time allowing polymerization to occur for longer than it otherwise would. The longer the polymerization time, the better the mechanical properties of the foam. The intensity of the stirring directly affects the density of the resulting foam. Increased stirring creates less dense foams. How the sample is handled after the gas foam solution has been applied directly affects the thickness of the resulting foam. A thick layer can be achieved by confining the sample to a mold, whereas a thin sample can be made by allowing the foam solution to run off of the sample. Alternatively, it may be possible to thin the sample by using processes like dipping, and rotating the sample after the foam solution has been applied.


The gas foam layer can be applied by any conventional coating technique such as dipping, casting, spraying unto a surface, etc. The removal of the foam can be manual peeling or automated, alternatively an adhesive surface can be used to facilitate the peeling process. In the manner described in this invention materials which textured surfaces can be created, the textures described can be from a single layer of open crater-like cells to an open celled foam of varying porosity and interconnectivity. The geometry of the texture is controlled by the geometry of the substrate, the microstructure of the texture is controlled by standard means of altering microstructures of all conventional gas foaming processes.


Hex code numbers given in the Examples are based on the hexadecimal code number system, which is a well known base-16 numbering system used to define colors. It is primarily used to define colors for web pages, but the inventors believe it is useful for identifying colors of the presently described foam-like materials as well. A hex number is written from 0-9 and then A-F. The first set represents the red hue, the second the green hue, and the third the blue. White is written as ff ff ff or #ffffff while black is 00 00 00 or #000000. Other examples are: Red=#ff0000, Green=#00ff00 and Blue=#0000ff. This is a color model that describes projected colors—colors as they are seen directly by our eyes, not reflected off of any surface and can be useful for defining the apparent brown color tones of the implantable materials described herein.


Color can also identifiable using the well known RGB color system (Red/Green/Blue) which is based on human perception of color. RGB colors can be converted to six digit hex code numbers and vice versa.


In the present invention, silicone foams can be made to have certain preselected colors, namely, various color shades in the brown color range.


In one embodiment, a process is provided for preparing, from a two part, RTV silicone foam (NuSil 2370) without added colors or dyes, a polymerized, porous, silicone foam having a bronze-brown color tone. For purposes of this disclosure, a bronze-brown color tone can be defined as a color having RGB color code values: R=about 184 to about 225, G=about 114 to about 140, and B=45 to about 55. Bronze color tones include, for example, color RGB code R-187, G-119, B-34 as well as color R-205, G-127, B-50.


The method comprises the steps of combining an uncolored, standard RTV silicone foam base (e.g. NuSil base R-2370) with its corresponding catalyst (e.g. NuSil catalyst R-2370), in a ratio of base to catalyst of about 100 ml base to 6 ml catalyst, and mixing the base and catalyst at a speed/agitation sufficient to create a foam having a viscosity of about 4300 mPas to about 4700 mPas, for example, about 4500 mPas. A molding surface can be dipped into this foam and allowed to polymerize. The resulting polymerized foam is removed from the molding surface has a bronze-brown color. The foam can then be used as a textured layer component on an inflatable breast implant, for example, as an outer surface of an inflatable, textured breast implant.


In another embodiment, a process for preparing a silicone foam is provided wherein the foam has a buff-brown color tone, that is, an RGB color code of RGB values: R=about 216 to about 264, G=about 198 to about 242, and B=180 to about 220. For example, buff-brown color tones include, for example, color RGB code R-238, G-238, B-187.


In this embodiment, the method comprises the steps of combining an uncolored, standard RTV silicone foam base (NuSil 2370) with its corresponding catalyst (NuSil 2370), and mixing the base and catalyst at a speed/agitation sufficient to create a foam having a viscosity of about 4800 mPas to about 5200 mPas, for example, about 5000 mPas. A molding surface can be dipped into the foam and allowed to polymerize. The resulting foam has a buff-brown color and is removed from the molding surface and used as a textured layer component on an inflatable breast implant.


In yet another embodiment, a process for preparing a silicone foam is provided wherein the foam has a brown color tone, that is, an RGB color code of RGB values: R=about 135 to about 165, G=about 68 to about 82, and B=0 to about 10. For example, brown color tones include, for example, color RGB code R-153, G-80, B-0.


In this embodiment, the method comprises the steps of combining an uncolored, standard RTV silicone foam base (NuSil 2380) with its corresponding catalyst (NuSil 2380), and mixing the base and catalyst at a speed/agitation sufficient to create a foam having a viscosity of about 3400 mPas to about 3800 mPas, for example, about 3600 mPas. A molding surface can be dipped into the foam and allowed to polymerize. The resulting foam has a brown color and is removed from the molding surface and used as a textured layer component on an inflatable breast implant.


The present invention further provides implantable materials useful as components of breast implants and having a desired color or tone and made by the methods described herein.


EXAMPLE 1
Process for Preparing a Silicone Foam Having a Bronze-Brown Color Tone

To prepare a bronze brown foam having a density of about 0.16 g/cm3, a two-part RTV silicone foam, R-2370, available from NuSil Silicone Technology, was prepared by mixing 100 ml of R-2370 base with 6 ml of R-2370 catalyst. The sample was then placed in a homogenizer with a propeller attachment and vigorously stirred at about 50 rpm for about 30 seconds at which point the viscosity was approximately 4500 mPas. A mandrel was then dipped directly into the foaming solution such that it became fully coated with the solution. The mandrel was removed and the excess solution is allowed to drip off. The sample was then allowed polymerize and a foam formed upon the mandrel. The foam was then removed in a peeling process which involved manually, by hand, peeling off the foam using abrasion. A single, open celled, foam-like texture layer approximately 0.3 mm thick remained behind on the sample. This process was then repeated 4 more times to give an approximate texture thickness of 1.5 mm. The approximate foam density was 0.16 g/cm3 and had a bronze brown color tone, RGB color code R-205, G-127, B-50 (hex code #CD7F32).


EXAMPLE 2
Process for Preparing a Silicone Foam Having a Buff-Brown Color Tone

A two-part RTV silicone foam, R-2370, available from NuSil Silicone Technology, was prepared by mixing 200 ml of R-2370 base with 12 ml of R-2370 catalyst. The sample was placed in a homogenizer with a propeller attachment and vigorously stirred at 100 rpm for 60 seconds at which point the viscosity was approximately 5000 mPas. A mandrel was then dipped directly into the foaming solution such that it was fully coated. The mandrel was removed and the excess solution was allowed to drip off. The sample was then allowed polymerize and a foam formed upon the mandrel. The foam was then removed in a peeling process which involves manually, by hand, peeling off the foam using abrasion. A single open celled foam like texture layer approximately 0.4 mm thick, remained behind on the sample. This process was then repeated 4 more times to give an approximate texture thickness of 2.0 mm. The approximate foam density was 0.11 g/cm3 and had a buff brown color tone RGB color code R-240, G-220, B-200 (hex code #F0DCC82).


EXAMPLE 3
Process for Preparing a Silicone Foam Having a Brown Color Tone

A two-part RTV silicone foam, R-2380, available from NuSil Silicone Technology, was prepared by mixing 500 ml of R-2380 base with 30 ml of R-2380 catalyst. The sample was placed in a homogenizer with a propeller attachment and vigorously stirred at 200 rpm for 30 seconds at which point the viscosity was approximately 3600 mPas. A flat mandrel with a 1.0 mm layer of cured silicone was then dipped directly into the foaming solution such that it was fully submerged. The mandrel was removed and the excess solution was allowed to drip off. After 10 seconds a sheet of open celled 100 ppi polyurethane foam was then placed directly onto the top of the foam as it began to polymerize. The foam was then allowed polymerize and a form upon the mandrel. The foam was then removed in a peeling process which involved removing the polyurethane foam. A single open celled foam like texture layer approximately 0.5 mm thick remained behind on the sample. This process is then repeated 4 more times to give an approximate texture thickness of approximately 4.0 mm. The approximate foam density was 0.31 g/cm3 and had a brown color tone and had a buff brown color tone RGB color code R-150, G-75, B-0 (hex code #964B00).


While this invention has been described with respect to various specific examples and embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto and that it can be variously practiced within the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making a material having a preselected color and suitable for implantation in a mammal, the method comprising: providing a silicone base component;providing a catalyst for the base component;mixing the base component with the catalyst at about 200 rpm for about 30 seconds to achieve a foam solution; andallowing the foam solution to polymerize to achieve a polymerized silicone material having a brown tone with RGB color code values R=about 135 to about 165, G=about 68 to about 82, and B=0 to about 10.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 that excludes the addition of any colorant, dye or similar agent.
  • 3. A method of making a material having a preselected color and suitable for implantation in a mammal, the method comprising: providing a silicone base component;providing a catalyst for the base component;mixing the base component with the catalyst at about 100 rpm for about 60 seconds to achieve a foam solution; andallowing the foam solution to polymerize to achieve a polymerized silicone material having a buff brown tone having RGB color code values R=about 216 to about 264, G=about 198 to about 242, and B=180 to about 220.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the foam solution has a viscosity of about 4800 mPas to about 5200 mPas.
  • 5. The method of claim 3 wherein the foam solution has a viscosity of about 5000 mPas.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the foam solution has a viscosity of between about 3400 mPas to about 3800 mPas.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the foam solution has a viscosity of about 3600 mPas.
  • 8. An implantable material useful as a component of a breast implant made by the method of claim 1.
  • 9. An implantable material useful as a component of a breast implant made by a method of claim 3.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of applying the foam solution to a molding surface prior to the step of allowing the foam solution to polymerize.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of dipping a mandrel into the foam solution prior to the step of allowing the foam solution to polymerize.
  • 12. The method of claim 3 further comprising the step of applying the foam solution to a molding surface prior to the step of allowing the foam solution to polymerize.
  • 13. The method of claim 3 further comprising the step of dipping a mandrel into the foam solution prior to the step of allowing the foam solution to polymerize.
Parent Case Info

This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/420,683, filed on Dec. 7, 2010, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by this specific reference.

US Referenced Citations (260)
Number Name Date Kind
2805208 Roche Sep 1957 A
3189921 Pangman Jun 1965 A
3293663 Cronin Dec 1966 A
3366975 Pangman Feb 1968 A
3559214 Pangman Feb 1971 A
3600718 Boone Aug 1971 A
3665520 Perras May 1972 A
3700380 Kitrilakis Oct 1972 A
3852832 McGhan Dec 1974 A
3934274 Hartley, Jr. Jan 1976 A
4034751 Hung Jul 1977 A
4157085 Austad Jun 1979 A
4231979 White Nov 1980 A
4264990 Hamas May 1981 A
4298997 Rybka Nov 1981 A
4298998 Naficy Nov 1981 A
4329385 Banks May 1982 A
4428082 Naficy Jan 1984 A
4433440 Cohen Feb 1984 A
4470160 Cavon Sep 1984 A
4482577 Goldstein Nov 1984 A
4499211 Walch Feb 1985 A
4531244 Hamas Jul 1985 A
4573999 Netto Mar 1986 A
4592755 Penton Jun 1986 A
4610690 Tiffamy Sep 1986 A
4636213 Pakiam Jan 1987 A
4643733 Becker Feb 1987 A
4648880 Brauman Mar 1987 A
4650487 Chaglassian Mar 1987 A
4651717 Jakubczak Mar 1987 A
4681587 Eberl Jul 1987 A
4740208 Cavon Apr 1988 A
4772285 Ksander Sep 1988 A
4773908 Becker Sep 1988 A
4773909 Chaglassian Sep 1988 A
4790848 Cronin Dec 1988 A
4795464 Eberl Jan 1989 A
4803025 Brockmeyer Feb 1989 A
4828560 Heyler May 1989 A
4840628 Cavon Jun 1989 A
4841992 Sasaki Jun 1989 A
4859383 Dillon Aug 1989 A
4859712 Cox Aug 1989 A
4889744 Quaid Dec 1989 A
4899764 Gauger Feb 1990 A
4902294 Gosserez Feb 1990 A
4906423 Frisch Mar 1990 A
4936858 O'Keeffe Jun 1990 A
4944749 Becker Jul 1990 A
4944750 Cox, Jr. Jul 1990 A
4950292 Audretsch Aug 1990 A
4955907 Ledergerber Sep 1990 A
4955909 Ersek Sep 1990 A
4960425 Yan Oct 1990 A
4965430 Curtis Oct 1990 A
4969899 Cox, Jr. Nov 1990 A
5002572 Picha Mar 1991 A
5007929 Quaid Apr 1991 A
5007940 Berg Apr 1991 A
5011494 von Recum et al. Apr 1991 A
5022942 Yan Jun 1991 A
5026394 Baker Jun 1991 A
5034422 Triolo Jul 1991 A
5035249 Sasaki Jul 1991 A
5092348 Dubrul Mar 1992 A
5092882 Lynn Mar 1992 A
5104409 Baker Apr 1992 A
5116387 Berg May 1992 A
5135959 Hill Aug 1992 A
5146933 Boyd Sep 1992 A
5147398 Lynn Sep 1992 A
5158571 Picha Oct 1992 A
5158573 Berg Oct 1992 A
5171269 Bark Dec 1992 A
5185297 Park Feb 1993 A
5207709 Picha May 1993 A
5219361 von Recum et al. Jun 1993 A
5236453 Picha Aug 1993 A
5236454 Miller Aug 1993 A
5236457 Devanathan Aug 1993 A
5246454 Petersen Sep 1993 A
5282856 Ledergerber Feb 1994 A
5296069 Robert Mar 1994 A
5348788 White Sep 1994 A
5354338 Ledergerber Oct 1994 A
5358521 Shane Oct 1994 A
5376117 Pinchuk Dec 1994 A
5383929 Ledergerber Jan 1995 A
5437824 Carlisle Aug 1995 A
5441919 Park Aug 1995 A
5447535 Muller Sep 1995 A
5455100 White Oct 1995 A
5459167 Giesen Oct 1995 A
5480430 Carlisle Jan 1996 A
5496367 Fisher Mar 1996 A
5496370 Hamas Mar 1996 A
5507808 Becker Apr 1996 A
5522896 Prescott Jun 1996 A
5525275 Iverson Jun 1996 A
5534023 Henley Jul 1996 A
5545217 Offray Aug 1996 A
5545220 Andrews Aug 1996 A
5549671 Waybright Aug 1996 A
5571179 Manders Nov 1996 A
RE35391 Brauman Dec 1996 E
5589176 Seare Dec 1996 A
5605693 Seare Feb 1997 A
5607473 Weber-Unger Mar 1997 A
5624674 Seare, Jr. Apr 1997 A
5630843 Rosenberg May 1997 A
5630844 Dogan May 1997 A
5653755 Ledergerber Aug 1997 A
5658330 Carlisle Aug 1997 A
5674285 Quaid Oct 1997 A
5681572 Seare, Jr. Oct 1997 A
5779734 Ledergerber Jul 1998 A
5798065 Picha Aug 1998 A
5824081 Knapp Oct 1998 A
5843189 Perouse Dec 1998 A
5855588 Young Jan 1999 A
5871497 Young Feb 1999 A
5895423 Becker Apr 1999 A
5935164 Iversen Aug 1999 A
5961552 Iversen Oct 1999 A
5964803 Iversen Oct 1999 A
5965076 Banks Oct 1999 A
5984943 Young Nov 1999 A
6071309 Knowlton Jun 2000 A
6074421 Murphy Jun 2000 A
6083262 Caravel Jul 2000 A
6099565 Sakura Aug 2000 A
6113634 Weber-Unger Sep 2000 A
6146418 Berman Nov 2000 A
6183514 Becker Feb 2001 B1
6187043 Ledergerber Feb 2001 B1
6203570 Baeke Mar 2001 B1
6206930 Burg Mar 2001 B1
6214045 Corbitt, Jr. Apr 2001 B1
6214926 Winn Apr 2001 B1
6315796 Eaton Nov 2001 B1
6387133 Perouse May 2002 B1
6432138 Offray Aug 2002 B1
6464726 Heljenek Oct 2002 B1
6520989 Eaton Feb 2003 B1
6531523 Davankov Mar 2003 B1
6544287 Johnson Apr 2003 B1
6602452 Schuessler Aug 2003 B2
6605116 Falcon Aug 2003 B2
6638308 Corbitt, Jr. Oct 2003 B2
6673285 Ma Jan 2004 B2
6692527 Bellin Feb 2004 B1
6755861 Nakao Jun 2004 B2
6802861 Hamas Oct 2004 B1
6811570 Gehl Nov 2004 B1
6818673 Ferguson Nov 2004 B2
6875233 Turner Apr 2005 B1
6881226 Corbitt, Jr. Apr 2005 B2
6900055 Fuller May 2005 B1
6913626 McGhan Jul 2005 B2
6916339 Missana Jul 2005 B1
6921418 Ledergerber Jul 2005 B2
6932840 Bretz Aug 2005 B1
7081135 Smith et al. Jul 2006 B2
7081136 Becker Jul 2006 B1
7105116 Bellin Sep 2006 B2
7169180 Brennan Jan 2007 B2
7192450 Brauker Mar 2007 B2
7244270 Lesh Jul 2007 B2
7323208 Ma Jan 2008 B2
7476249 Frank Jan 2009 B2
7520896 Benslimane Apr 2009 B2
7547393 Ramaswamy Jun 2009 B2
7625405 Purkait Dec 2009 B2
7632228 Brauker Dec 2009 B2
7632291 Stephens Dec 2009 B2
7641688 Lesh Jan 2010 B2
7645475 Prewett Jan 2010 B2
8202317 Becker Jun 2012 B2
8313527 Powell et al. Nov 2012 B2
20020038147 Miller Mar 2002 A1
20020193885 Legeay Dec 2002 A1
20030036803 McGhan Feb 2003 A1
20030093151 Zhang May 2003 A1
20030105469 Karmon Jun 2003 A1
20030205846 Bellin Nov 2003 A1
20030208269 Eaton Nov 2003 A1
20040010225 Schuessler Jan 2004 A1
20040115241 Calhoun Jun 2004 A1
20040127985 Bellin Jul 2004 A1
20040143327 Ku Jul 2004 A1
20040148024 Williams Jul 2004 A1
20040153151 Gonzales Aug 2004 A1
20040213986 Kim Oct 2004 A1
20050055093 Brennan Mar 2005 A1
20050070124 Miller Mar 2005 A1
20050112169 Brauker May 2005 A1
20050122169 Watanabe Jun 2005 A1
20050196452 Boyan et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216094 Prewett Sep 2005 A1
20060036266 Sulamanidze et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036320 Job Feb 2006 A1
20060136056 Wohl Jun 2006 A1
20060224239 Tiahrt Oct 2006 A1
20060229721 Ku Oct 2006 A1
20060235094 Habibi-Naini Oct 2006 A1
20060246121 Ma Nov 2006 A1
20070093911 Fricke Apr 2007 A1
20070104693 Quijano May 2007 A1
20070104695 Quijano May 2007 A1
20070116735 Calhoun May 2007 A1
20070135916 Maxwell Jun 2007 A1
20070154525 Calhoun Jul 2007 A1
20070190108 Datta et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198085 Benslimane Aug 2007 A1
20080009830 Fujimoto Jan 2008 A1
20080071371 Elshout Mar 2008 A1
20080075752 Ratner Mar 2008 A1
20080154366 Frank Jun 2008 A1
20080241212 Moses Oct 2008 A1
20080268019 Badylak Oct 2008 A1
20080312739 Agerup Dec 2008 A1
20090045166 Li Feb 2009 A1
20090082864 Chen Mar 2009 A1
20090087641 Favis Apr 2009 A1
20090093878 Glicksman Apr 2009 A1
20090118829 Powell May 2009 A1
20090125107 Maxwell May 2009 A1
20090149953 Schuessler et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090169716 Linhardt Jul 2009 A1
20090198331 Kesten et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198332 Becker Aug 2009 A1
20090198333 Becker Aug 2009 A1
20100042211 Van Epps et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042212 Van Epps et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100292790 Stroumpoulis et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110054605 Becker Mar 2011 A1
20110093069 Goraltchouk et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110106249 Becker May 2011 A1
20110117267 Powell et al. May 2011 A1
20110184531 Goraltchouk et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110196488 Goraltchouk et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110196489 Van Epps et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110276133 Liu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276134 Manesis et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110278755 Liu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282444 Liu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110309541 Thompson et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313073 Goraltchouk et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120004722 Goraltchouk et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120041555 Manesis et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120077010 Manesis et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120077012 Liu et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120077891 Liu et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120101574 Goraltchouk et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120321777 Stroumpoulis et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130013062 Thompson et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130023987 Liu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130032962 Liu et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130053956 Powell et al. Feb 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
0230672 Aug 1987 EP
0315814 May 1989 EP
1532942 May 2005 EP
2003-062062 Apr 2003 JP
2007-029717 Aug 2007 JP
2010077105 Jul 2010 KR
WO 9810803 Mar 1998 WO
WO 0024437 May 2000 WO
WO 2004037318 May 2004 WO
WO 2004062531 Jul 2004 WO
2006133366 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2009061672 May 2009 WO
WO 2009110917 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2011094155 Aug 2011 WO
WO 2011097499 Aug 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (19)
Entry
Harper, J.R.; Baumann Menko, T.M.; Nicholson, W. “Silicone Foams” Chapter 12 in Handbook of Polymeric Foams and Foam Technology. 2nd Ed. Ed. By D. Klempner and V. Sendijarevic. 2004. pp. 379-383.
“Soma Foama(r) 15” by Smooth-on. Published on the web Jan. 5, 2008. Accessed Oct. 12, 2012 at www.smooth-on.com/tb/files/Soma—Foama—15.pdf.
“Silc Pig(r) Pigments” by Smooth-on. Published on the web Jan. 15, 2010. Accessed Oct. 12, 2012 at www.smooth-on.com/tb/files/Silc—Pig—Pigments.pdf.
“Product Profile” by NuSil. Copyright 2005.
Jang, Hyeon Su. Convenient air purification nose mask. Patent No. KR 20100077105. SciFinder abstract. Accessed Sep. 24, 2012.
Screen capture: Nusil homepage www.nusil.com accessed via internet archive wayback machine. Wayback date: Mar. 31, 2005. Accessed Oct. 9, 2012.
Brauker et al., “Neovascularization of synthetic membranes directed by membrane microarchitecture”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1995, pp. 1517-1524, vol. 29, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Brohim et al., “Early Tissue Reaction to Textured Breast Implant Surfaces”, Anals of Plastic Surgery, 28(4): 354-362.
Sharkawy et al. “Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants”, II. Plasma—tissue exchange properties, 1998, pp. 586-597, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Alvarez, Sonia et al., “Synthesis of Macro/Mesoporous Silica and Carbon Monoliths by Using a Commercial Polyurethane Foam as Sacrificial Template”, Materials Letters, 61, 2378-2381 (2007).
Barr, S. et al., “Current Implant Surface Technology: An Examination of Their Nanostructure and Their Influence on Fibroblast Alignment and Biocompatibility”, Elastic, 2009, 9, 198-217.
Barnsley, Philip et al., “Textured Surface Breast Implants in the Prevention of Capsular Contracture Among Breast Augmentation Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2006, 117(7), 2182-2190.
Inamed Aesthetics Brochure, Directions for Use Style 410 Silicone-Filled Breast Implants (2003).
Ma, Peter, “Scaffolds for tissue fabrication”, Materials Today, 2004, 7, 30-40.
Mikes. Antonius et al., “Formation of Highly Porous Biodegradable Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering”, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2000, 3(2), 114-119.
Minami, Eliza et al., “The Composition and Behavior of Capsules Around Smooth and Textured Breast Implants in Pigs”, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2006, 118940, 874-884.
Murphy, William et al., “Salt Fusion: An Approach to Improve Pore Interconnectivity Within Tissue Engineering Scaffolds”, Tissue Engineering, vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2004.
Wei, Guobao et al., “Macroporous and Nanofibers Polymer Scaffolds and Polymer/bone-like Apatite Composite Scaffolds Generated by Sugar Spheres”, Journal of I3iomedical Materials Research Part A, 2006, 306-315.
Zhang, Yuan et al., “Macroporous Alumina Monoliths Prepared by Filling Polymer Foams With Alumina Hydrosols”, J. Mater Sci., 44, 931-938 (2009).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120142798 A1 Jun 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61420683 Dec 2010 US