Patent Application
20150299089
The present invention relates to a process for the production of a biomass hydrolysate suitable for the production of levulinic acid and formic acid, to a biomass hydrolysate obtainable by said process, to a process for the production of levulinic acid and formic acid from said biomass, and to levulinic acid and formic acid obtainable by said process.
Levulinic acid is a starting molecule for the synthesis of esters known as fuel additive and is known to be useful as plasticisers and solvents. Levulinic acid can be used to synthesize methyl tetrahydrofuran (MTHF) or can be used as a solvent. Other applications of levulinic acid are for example the synthesis of delta-amino levulinic acid used as herbicides and pesticides, diphenolic acid used to synthesize polycarbonates and succinic acid used to make polyesters. Levulinic acid can also be used to produce gamma-valerolactone (5-methylbutyrolactone), which in turn can be used for production of adipic acid (1,6-hexanedioic acid).
Formic acid is used as a preservative and antibacterial agent in livestock feed in the production of leather and in dyeing and finishing of textile. It is also used as coagulant in the production of rubber as well as cleaning agent assistant and potential future fuel for fuel cells.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,138,371 relates to a process to produce formic acid from biomass. The process of U.S. Pat. No. 8,138,371 involves two subsequent hydrolysis reactions. Between the first and the second hydrolysis reaction the temperature is decreased. An example is described in Example 2 of US 8,138,371 where crude paper pulp containing 148.8 kg of cellulose is subjected to a first hydrolysis reaction in a stage tubular reactor at 205° C. and at a H2SO4 concentration of 4 wt % and a residence time of 15 seconds. The resulting mixture is then subjected to a second hydrolysis at 185° C. with a residence time of 25 minutes. This results in 33.3 kg of formic acid, corresponding to a formic acid yield of 22% which represents 82% of the theoretical yield. A yield of 62 wt % for levulinic acid is reported. U.S. Pat. No. 5,608,105 relates to a process to produce levulinic acid from biomass. Like U.S. Pat. No. 8,138,371, the process also contains two subsequent hydrolysis reactions with intermittent lowering of temperature. In Example 6 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,608,105 a 10 wt % slurry of hardwood containing 5.0 wt % H2SO4 is subjected to a first hydrolysis reaction in a stage tubular reactor at 220° C. with a residence time of 15.7 seconds. The resulting mixture is then subjected to a second hydrolysis at 210° C. with a residence time of 20 minutes. The levulinic acid concentration in the liquid after the second hydrolysis is 1.05% at steady state and the yield is 62% of the theoretical yield. However, no yields and concentration of formic acid are reported. U.S. Pat. No. 4,897,497 relates to the production of levulinic acid and furfural from biomass. Like U.S. Pat. No. 5,608,105 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,138,371, the process of U.S. Pat. No. 4,897,497 contains two subsequent hydrolysis reactions with intermittent lowering of temperature. U.S. Pat. No. 6,054,611 relates to a process to produce levulinic acid from glucose or biomass where when starting from biomass two hydrolysis reactions are utilized where the acid concentration is lowered from the first to the second reaction by means of dilution.
It is an aim of the invention to provide a simple process to produce formic acid and levulinic acid from biomass. It is another aim of the invention to provide a process to produce formic acid and levulinic acid from biomass with higher selectivity. It is another aim of the invention to provide a process to produce a biomass hydrolysate comprising formic acid and levulinic acid which is suitable for high biomass loading. It is another aim of the invention to provide a process to produce a biomass hydrolysate comprising formic acid and levulinic acid from which the formic acid and levulinic acid can be efficiently isolated.
The invention provides an improved hydrolysis process for the production of a biomass hydrolysate, suitable for the production of levulinic acid and formic acid, and to a process for the production of levulinic acid and formic acid from such biomass hydrolysate. The hydrolysis process includes a single hydrolysis step wherein a slurried biomass is subjected to a temperature of between 120 and 200° C., preferably between 160 and 190° C., for a time period of between 2 and 8 hours, preferably between 20 and 140 minutes at a mineral acid concentration of between 1-15 wt %. The process can be carried out starting from lignocellulosic biomass, and also from sugars such as glucose and fructose.
The invention provides a process to produce a biomass hydrolysate, suitable for the production of levulinic acid and formic acid, said process comprising a single hydrolysis step, said hydrolysis step comprising:
The inventors have surprisingly found that a biomass hydrolysate comprising both levulinic acid and formic acid can be produced from biomass consisting of only one hydrolysis reaction without intermittent cooling and heating or acid dilution.
Particularly good results are obtained when the reaction is done using H2SO4 as mineral acid, and when the residence time (T, in minutes), the H2SO4 concentration ([H2SO4], expressed in wt %), and the temperature (in K) of the reaction are such that the outcome of equation (I) lies between 0.21E-16 and 1.63E-16. Thus, the skilled person can easily, without undue burden, select suitable temperature, H2SO4 concentration, and residence time to produce a biomass hydrolysate comprising levulinic acid and formic acid.
T*[H2SO4]*exp(−19000/T) (I)
In other words, the temperature, residence time, and H2SO4 concentration are preferably selected such that: 0.21E-16≧T*[H2SO4]*exp(−19000/T)≧1.63E-16.
The temperature is preferably kept essentially constant during the reaction, but it may vary somewhat in the course of the reaction. This is no problem, so long as the outcome of equation I lies between 0.21 E-16 and 1.63E-16. In general, the temperature may vary between +/−15° C., preferably the variation in temperature in the course of the reaction is +/−10° C., more preferably +/−5° C., even more preferably +/−3° C.
The biomass hydrolysate comprises levulinic acid and formic acid. The amount of levulinic acid in the biomass hydrolysate produced by the process of the invention is preferably at least 1.1 wt % relative to the total weight of the biomass hydrolysate, more preferably at least 1.5 wt %, even more preferably at least 2 wt %, or at least 3 wt %.
The amount of formic acid in the biomass hydrolysate produced by the process of the invention is preferably at least 0.55 wt % relative to the total weight of the biomass hydrolysate, more preferably at least 0.75 wt %, at least 1 wt %, at least 1.5 wt %.
The biomass may be or may be derived from grass, cereal, starch, algae, tree bark, hay, straw, leaves, paper pulp, paper sludge, or dung. Paper pulp, or simply pulp, is a lignocellulosic fibrous material prepared by chemically or mechanically separating cellulose from wood, fibre crops or waste paper. Pulp is rich in cellulose and other carbohydrates. Paper sludge, or simply sludge, is a lignocellulosic fibrous containing cellulose fibres too short for usage in the paper industry. The biomass may comprise lignocellulosic biomass. Lignocellulosic biomass typically has a fibrous nature and comprises a bran fraction that contains the majority of lignocellulosic (bran) fibers. As an example, corn fiber is a heterogeneous complex of carbohydrate polymers and lignin. It is primarily composed of the outer kernel covering or seed pericarp, along with 10-25% adherent starch. Carbohydrate analyses of corn fiber vary considerably according to the source of the material. The lignocellulosic biomass may comprise hemicellulose.
In an embodiment, the biomass comprises C6 sugars, particularly fructose or glucose, or mixtures thereof. Sucrose (C12H22O11) can be broken down into one molecule of glucose (C6H12O6) plus one molecule of fructose (also C6H12O6, an isomer of glucose), in a weakly acidic environment by a process called inversion. Fructose can also be made by enzymatic isomerization of glucose. Sucrose is commonly produced from biomass such as beet, corn and cane. When starting from sugars such as glucose or fructose, “slurried” can simply refer to a dissolved state. Thus, in such case the process comprises subjecting a solution of (dissolved) C6 sugars to a temperature of between 120 and 200° C., preferably between 160 and 190° C., for a time period of between 2 and 8 hours, preferably between 20 and 140 minutes at a mineral acid concentration of between 1-15 wt %.
In an embodiment, the biomass hydrolysate is made by acid hydrolysis of C6 sugars, particularly of fructose or glucose or mixtures thereof. Thus, in the context of the invention, an acid hydrolysate obtained from glucose or fructose is understood to be a biomass hydrolysate.
The mineral acid may be H2SO4, H3PO4, or HCl, or a mixture thereof. A preferred mineral acid is H2SO4. Preferred concentrations range between 3 and 14%. Mineral acid may be added prior or during the hydrolysis step.
If the hydrolysis comprises a recycle step, the levulinic acid and formic acid concentration in the recycle stream is lower than concentration in the product stream. Preferably the recycle stream comprises an aqueous fraction of a subsequent extraction step or of a subsequent isolation step.
The hydrolysis is preferably a single pass reaction, meaning that the direct reaction product of the hydrolysis reaction is not fed back to the reactor.
The hydrolysis may be carried out in a plug-flow type reactor system. A plug-flow type reactor system results in plugflow reaction kinetics. The skilled person understands the concept of plugflow reaction kinetics and knows how to carry out the hydrolysis such that plugflow-type kinetics are obtained. Reaction kinetics are a well-known concept in the art and for example described in O. Levenspiel, “Chemical Reaction Engineering”, 1998, pp 130-140.
A suitable plug-flow type reactor system is a plugflow reactor. It is possible to obtain plugflow reaction kinetics by using multiple continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) in series. The process may be carried out in a series of two or more, preferably three or more, four or more, more preferably five or more, even more preferably six or more batch reactors. A preferred reactor type is a tubular reactor. The tubular reactor may comprise one or more reactors. Thus, the tubular reactor may consist of two, three, four etc. tubular reactors in series. Such system can still be considered to be functionally one tubular reactor, and such process still comprises only a single hydrolysis step because the hydrolysis conditions with respect to temperature, time, and acid concentration will be substantially the same in each of the tubular reactors.
The concentration of the biomass in the slurried biomass may range anywhere between 1 and 75 wt %. A preferred concentration is between 10 and 50 wt %, more preferably between 15 and 50 wt %, all based on total weight of the slurried biomass. The slurried biomass may have a concentration of between 25-50 wt %, 30-50 wt %, 35-50 wt %, 40-50 wt %, or even 45-50 wt %. Using high biomass concentrations may result in a biomass hydrolysate having higher contents (wt %) of formic acid and/or levulinic acid. This has the additional advantage that any subsequent process steps such as the isolation of formic acid and/or levulinic acid e.g. including filtration, distillation, and/or solvent-solvent extraction can be carried out at smaller volumes meaning smaller equipment and concomitant lower investment cost and a lower environmental impact.
The wood concentrations used in biomass hydrolysis as described in the Examples of U.S. Pat. No. 8,138,371 are 10 wt % or less. The inventors have tried to use higher wood concentrations up 20 wt % and higher but found the process of U.S. Pat. No. 8,138,371 not suitable for such high concentrations as it led to clogging of their first hydrolysis reactor. The prescribed hydrolysis times in U.S. Pat. No. 8,138,371 range between 10 and 60 seconds; in the Examples of U.S. Pat. No. 8,138,371, the first hydrolysis reaction is typically 20 seconds or less. Instead, the process of the invention uses only a single hydrolysis step, which step is longer than 60 seconds and which does not result in any substantial clogging even at high biomass concentrations and which is very suitable for using high biomass loading.
The process may further comprise, prior to the hydrolysis step, an impregnation step to form a biomass slurry. The conditions of the impregnation step are not critical.
In another aspect the invention provides a biomass hydrolysate obtainable by the process of the invention. Said biomass hydrolysate may have several advantages. The biomass hydrolysate produced by the process of the invention may further comprise char. Tar and char represent organic material which is insoluble in water, which is dark in colour and which tends to become viscous and very dark to almost black when concentrated. Tar can be formed during heating of organic material, for example by pyrolysis, but is also formed when carbohydrates are subjected to acid hydrolysis, particularly when done at high temperatures. Char usually refers to solid material, for example the remains of solid biomass that has been incompletely combusted, such as charcoal if wood is incompletely burned. Tar usually refers (viscous) liquid, e.g. derived from the destructive distillation of organic matter. Char may negatively affect the isolation of a bio-based product e.g. because of its stickiness. In the context of the invention, “char” is understood to include tar.
The process of the invention is advantageous in that any char which is produced does not hamper subsequent isolation of formic acid and levulinic acid from the biomass hydrolysate, or to a lesser extent, as compared to biomass hydrolysates produced by processes known in the art. Also, due to the favourable properties of any char produced by the process, the char does not negatively affect the hydrolysis reaction as much, for example it results in little of no clogging of the reactor.
The invention also provides char obtainable by the process of the invention. The char of the invention may be isolated from the biomass hydrolysate, for example by extraction, membrane filtration, or solid-liquid separation or a combination thereof.
The char of the invention is non-sticky and has a favourable particle size which makes it easily to handle.
The formic acid and the levulinic acid can be recovered from the biomass hydrolysate by methods known in the art, such as extraction and distillation, see for example US2010/0324310.
In one embodiment, formic acid and levulinic acid are isolated from the biomass hydrolysate made by the process of the invention as follows:
In another embodiment, formic acid and levulinic acid are isolated from the biomass hydrolysate made by the process of the invention as follows:
In these isolation methods, a vapor condensate can be used to wash the solid fraction. Formic acid in the condensate may thus not be lost but is retained. Any levulinic acid bound to the solid fraction (e.g. bound to char) may also be washed therefrom and thus retained. Also, this step may reduce water consumption as no or little external water is required.
In another aspect the invention provides a method to produce formic acid and levulinic acid from biomass comprising:
In yet another aspect the invention provides a method to produce formic acid and levulinic acid from biomass comprising:
In yet another aspect the invention provides formic acid obtainable by the process of the invention. The formic acid of the invention may be in the form of a composition, preferably an aqueous composition.
In a further aspect the invention provides levulinic acid obtainable by the process of the invention. The formic acid of the invention may be in the form of a composition, preferably an aqueous composition.
10 ml microwave tubes were prepared as follows: a stirring bar was added and 700 mg of soft wood biomass (ground and sieved; particle size <1 mm) was added. Next the biomass was impregnated. For the acid hydrolysis reaction, the tubes were capped and placed in the carrousel of a microwave and the microwave programmed as follows: 1 minute pre-stirring, 190° C., 1 minute; 1 minute pre-stirring, 190° C., 2 minutes; 1 minute pre-stirring, 190° C., 5 minutes; 1 minute pre-stirring, 190° C., 10 minutes. The acid hydrolysis was done in the presence of approximately 5 wt % hydrosulphuric acid. After the acid hydrolysis and cooling down, aliquots of the resulting biomass hydrolysate were taken from the supernatant and analyzed with HPLC. Results of the resulting composition are in Table 1.
100 g wood chips were impregnated for 90 minutes. After impregnation, the temperature was raised to the reaction temperature and the slurry was subjected to acid hydrolysis in the presence of approximately 5 wt % hydrosulphuric acid without stirring. The resulting biomass hydrolysate suspension was subjected to solid/liquid separation. Results of the liquid fraction and the reaction conditions are stated in Table 2.
The liquid fraction of the biomass hydrolysate of Example 2 can be cooled via evaporation resulting in a vapor. The resulting vapor can be condensed resulting in an aqueous solution of 1% formic acid, 0.02% acetic acid and 0.02% levulinic acid.
365 g of the biomass hydrolysate suspension was filtered over a filter cloth with a pressure difference of 0.1 bar. The filter cake was washed three times with 50 g water. The conductivity of the wash water, an indication for the ion content (organic acids and sulfuric acid) was measured to be 225.2 mS/cm in the first filtrate, 30.02 mS/cm in the first wash, 3.52 mS/cm in the second wash and 0.786 mS/cm in the third.
A biomass hydrolysate was enriched with levulinic acid to a levulinic acid concentration of 9.07 wt % and with formic acid to a formic acid concentration of 1.89 wt % to simulate the flash step in Example 3. 2.1 kg reaction solution was 5 times extracted 1.7 kg of fresh methyltetrahydrofuran at 60° C. After the fifth extraction 99.1% of the levulinic acid and 98.8% of the formic acid present in the reaction solution could be collected in the organic layer.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12196081.9 | Dec 2012 | EP | regional |
| 13183333.7 | Sep 2013 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2013/075962 | 12/9/2013 | WO | 00 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61734530 | Dec 2012 | US |
