Process for the production of a carboxylic acid

The present invention relates to a process for the production of a carboxylic acid by carbonylation of an alkyl alcohol and/or a reactive derivative thereof in the presence of an iridium catalyst or a rhodium catalyst.
Carbonylation processes in the presence of iridium catalysts are known and are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3772380, European patent publication number EP 0618184, UK patents GB 1276326, GB 1234641 and GB 1234642.
Carbonylation processes in the presence of rhodium catalysts are known and are described, for example, in U. S. Pat. No. 3769329.
Japanese laid-open patent application JP 51080813 to Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd describes a method of producing carboxylic acids and/or esters thereof characterised in that alcohols and carbon monoxide are heated and reacted in the presence of a rhenium catalyst and halogen compounds.
J. Molecular Catalysis, 2(1977) 149-161 relates to iridium-catalysed homogenous carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid, using methyl iodide as promoter. Although it is stated that their studies with rhodium have shown a synergistic effect when a salt or a complex of zirconium, rhenium, cobalt or copper was used, the effect being most significant with copper, no experimental examples showing the promotional effect of any of these metals with rhodium are given.
It has now been found that rhenium has a beneficial effect on the rate of carbonylation of an alkyl alcohol and/or a reactive derivative thereof in the presence of an iridium catalyst or a rhodium catalyst particularly at low partial pressure of carbon monoxide and that rhenium can stabilise the catalyst, for example during separation of product from rhodium catalyst at reduced partial pressure of carbon monoxide. Thus, according to the present invention there is provided a process for the production of a carboxylic acid by carbonylation of an alkyl alcohol and/or a reactive derivative thereof which process comprises contacting said alcohol and/or a reactive derivative thereof with carbon monoxide in a liquid reaction composition in a carbonylation reactor; the liquid reaction composition comprising: (a) an iridium catalyst or a rhodium catalyst, (b) alkyl halide, (c) at least a finite concentration of water, and (d) rhenium as promoter.
Suitable alkyl alcohols comprise C.sub.1 to C.sub.10, preferably C.sub.1 to C.sub.6, more preferably C.sub.1 to C.sub.4 alkyl alcohols and yet more preferably methanol. Preferably, the alkyl alcohol is a primary or secondary alkyl alcohol. The carboxylic acid product of an alcohol having n carbon atoms is a carboxylic acid having n+l carbon atoms.
Suitable reactive derivatives of the alkyl alcohol include the corresponding alkyl ester of the alcohol and the corresponding carboxylic acid product, dialkyl ethers and alkyl halides, preferably iodides or bromides. Suitable reactive derivatives of methanol include methyl acetate, dimethyl ether and methyl iodide. A mixture of alkyl alcohol and reactive derivatives thereof may be used as reactants in the process of the present invention. Preferably, methanol and/or methyl acetate are used as reactants. At least some of the alkyl alcohol and/or reactive derivative thereof will be converted to, and hence present as, alkyl ester in the liquid reaction composition by reaction with carboxylic acid product or solvent. When the catalyst is an iridium catalyst the concentration in the liquid reaction composition of alkyl ester is suitably in the range 1 to 70% by weight, preferably 2 to 50% by weight, more preferably 3 to 30% by weight. When the catalyst is a rhodium catalyst the concentration in the liquid reaction composition, of alkyl ester is suitably in the range 0.1 to 50% by weight, preferably 0.5 to 50% by weight, more preferably 0.5 to 35% by weight. In a continuous process for the preparation of acetic acid by carbonylation of methanol in the presence of a rhodium catalyst the concentration of methyl aceatate in the liquid reaction composition may typically be up to 5% by weight.
Water may be formed in situ in the liquid reaction composition, for example, by the esterification reaction between alkyl alcohol reactant and carboxylic acid product. Water may be introduced to the carbonylation reactor together with or separately from other components of the liquid reaction composition. Water may be separated from other components of reaction composition withdrawn from the reactor and may be recycled in controlled amounts to maintain the required concentration of water in the liquid reaction composition. Suitably, the concentration of water in the liquid reaction composition is in the range 0.1 to 15% by weight, preferably 1 to 15% by weight. Preferably, the concentration of water is maintained below 14%, more preferably below 11% and most preferably below 8% by weight.
The iridium catalyst in the liquid reaction composition may comprise any iridium containing compound which is soluble in the liquid reaction composition. The iridium catalyst may be added to the liquid reaction composition for the carbonylation reaction in any suitable form which dissolves in the liquid reaction composition or is convertible to a soluble form. Examples of suitable iridium-containing compounds which may be added to the liquid reaction composition include IrCl.sub.3, IrI.sub.3, IrBr.sub.3, Ir(CO).sub.2 I!.sub.2, Ir(CO).sub.2 Cl!.sub.2, Ir(CO).sub.2 Br!.sub.2, Ir(CO).sub.2 I.sub.2 !.sup.- H.sup.+, Ir(CO).sub.2 Br.sub.2 !.sup.-H.sup.+, Ir(CO).sub.2 I.sub.2 !.sup.- H.sup.+, Ir(CH.sub.3)I.sub.3 (CO).sub.2 !.sup.- H.sup.+, Ir.sub.4 (CO).sub.12 , IrCl.sub.3 4H.sub.2 O,IrBr.sub.3 4H.sub.2 O, Ir.sub.3 (CO).sub.12, iridium metal, Ir.sub.2 O.sub.3, IrO.sub.2, Ir(acac)(CO).sub.2, IR(acac).sub.3, iridium acetate, Ir.sub.3 O(OAc).sub.6 (H.sub.2 O).sub.3 ! OAc!, and hexachloroiridic acid H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 !,preferably, chloride- free complexes of iridium such as acetates, oxalates and acetoacetates which are soluble in one or more of the carbonylation reaction components such as water, alcohol and/or carboxylic acid. Particularly preferred is green iridium acetate which may be used in an acetic acid or aqueous acetic acid solution.
Preferably, the iridium catalyst concentration in the liquid reaction composition is in the range 100 to 6000 ppm by weight of iridium.
The rhodium catalyst in the liquid reaction composition may comprise any rhodium containing compound which is soluble in the liquid reaction composition. The rhodium catalyst may be added to the liquid reaction composition in any suitable form which dissolves in the liquid reaction composition or is convertible to a soluble form. Examples of suitable rhodium-containing compounds which may be added to the liquid reaction composition include Rh(CO).sub.2 Cl!.sub.2, Rh(CO).sub.2 I!.sub.2, Rh(Cod)cl!.sub.2, rhodium (lII) chloride, rhodium (III) chloride trihydrate, rhodium (III) bromide, rhodium (III) iodide, rhodium (III) acetate, rhodium dicarbonylacetylacetonate, RhC1.sub.3 (PPh.sub.3).sub.3 and RhCI(CO)(PPh.sub.3).sub.2.
Preferably, the concentration of the rhodium catalyst in the liquid reaction composition is in the range from 1 ppm up to its limit of solubility in the reactor and/or product recovery system, typically 10 to 1500 ppm by weight of rhodium.
The rhenium promoter may comprise any rhenium containing compound which is soluble in the liquid reaction composition. The promoter may be added to the liquid reaction composition for the carbonylation reaction in any suitable form which dissolves in the liquid reaction composition or is convertible to soluble form.
Examples of suitable rhenium-containing compounds which may be used include Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10, Re(CO).sub.5 Cl, Re(CO).sub.5 Br, Re(CO).sub.5 I, ReCI.sub.3.xH.sub.2 O, ReCl.sub.5.yH.sub.2 O and {Re(CO).sub.4 I}.sub.2 !.
When the catalyst is an iridium catalyst, preferably, both the iridium- and rhenium-containing compounds are free of impurities which provide or generate in situ ionic iodides which may inhibit the reaction, for example, alkali or alkaline earth metal or other metal salts.
The molar ratio of rhenium promoter: iridium catalyst in the liquid reaction composition is suitably in the range 0.1:1 to 20:1, preferably in the range 0.1:1 to 10:1.
The molar ratio rhenium promoter: rhodium catalyst in the liquid reaction composition is suitably in the range 0.1:1 to 20: 1, preferably in the range 1:1 to 10: 1.
Suitable alkyl halides have alkyl moleties corresponding to the alkyl moiety of the alkyl alcohol reactant and are preferably C.sub.1 to C.sub.10, more preferably C 1 to C.sub.6 and yet more preferably C.sub.1 to C.sub.4 alkyl halides. Preferably, the alkyl halide is an iodide or bromide, more preferably an iodide. Preferably, the concentration of alkyl halide in the liquid reaction composition is in the range 1 to 30%, preferably 1 to 20%, more preferably 2 to 16% by weight.
The carbon monoxide reactant may be essentially pure or may contain inert impurities such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen, noble gases, water and C 1 to C.sub.4 paraffinic hydrocarbons. The presence of hydrogen in the carbon monoxide and generated in situ by the water gas shift reaction is preferably kept low, for example, less than 1 bar partial pressure, as its presence may result in the formation of hydrogenation products. The partial pressure of carbon monoxide in the reactor is suitably in the range 1 to 70 bar, preferably 1 to 35 bar and more preferably 1 to 15 bar.
The total pressure in the carbonylation reactor is suitably in the range 10 to 200 barg, preferably 10 to 100 barg, more preferably 15 to 50 barg and yet more preferably 30 barg or less.
The promotional effect of rhenium in the catalyst systems of the present invention has been found to be most pronounced at relatively low partial pressure of carbon monoxide in the carbonylation reactor where the rate of reaction may be dependent upon the carbon monoxide partial pressure, for example for iridium-catalysed reactions at a partial pressure of less than or equal to 15 bar and for rhodium-catalysed reactions at a partial pressure of less than or equal to 7 bar. Under these conditions, it has been found that the catalyst system of the present invention has the advantage of providing an increased rate of reaction over catalyst systems without the rhenium promoter of the present invention. This advantage allows for increased rate of reaction under conditions when the carbon monoxide partial pressure is relatively low, for example due to a low total pressure in the carbonylation reactor or due to high vapour pressure of components of the liquid reaction composition, for example at high methyl acetate concentration in the liquid reaction composition or due to high concentration of inert gases (for example nitrogen and carbon dioxide) in the carbonylati on reactor. The catalyst system may also have advantages of increasing rate of carbonylation when the rate of reaction is reduced by the availability of carbon monoxide in solution in the liquid reaction composition resulting from mass transfer limitations, for example due to poor agitation.
The temperature of the carbonylation reaction is suitably in the range 100 to 300.degree. C., preferably in the range 150.degree.to 220.degree. C., more preferably in the range 170.degree.to 200.degree. C.
Carboxylic acid may be used as a solvent for the reaction.
Ionic contaminants such as, for example, corrosion metals, particularly nickel, iron and chromium should be kept to a minimum in the liquid reaction composition when iridium is the catalyst as these may have an adverse effect on the reaction.
The process of the present invention may be performed as a batch or a continuous process, preferably as a continuous process.
The carboxylic acid product may be removed from the reactor by withdrawing liquid reaction composition and separating the carboxylic acid product by one or more flash and/or fractional distillation stages from the other components of the liquid reaction composition such as iridium or rhodium catalyst, rhenium promoter, alkyl halide, water and unconsumed reactants which may be recycled to the reactor to maintain their concentrations in the liquid reaction composition. The carboxylic acid product may be separated from the catalyst and promoter at a partial pressure of carbon monoxide less than that in the carbonylation reactor, for example at a partial pressure of 0.25 bar or less. The carboxylic acid product may also be removed as a vapour from the reactor.
The invention will now be illustrated by way of example only by reference to the following examples and by reference to FIG. 1 which shows in graph form the effect of rhenium on the rate of iridium-catalysed carbonylation of methanol at 22 barg total pressure.
Iridium-Catalysed Carbonylation Reactions
All experiments were performed using a 300 ml Hastelloy B2 (Trade Mark) autoclave equipped with a Dispersimax (Trade Mark) stirrer, liquid or solid catalyst injection facility and cooling coils. A gas supply to the autoclave was provided from a ballast vessel, feed gas being provided to maintain the autoclave at a constant pressure. The rate of gas uptake at a certain point in a reaction run was used to calculate the carbonylation rate, as number of moles of reactant consumed per litre of cold degassed reactor composition per hour (mol/1/hr), at a particular reactor composition (reactor composition based on a cold degassed volume).
The methyl acetate concentration was calculated during the course of the reaction from the starting composition, assuming that one mole of methyl acetate is consumed for every mole of carbon monoxide that is consumed. No allowance was made for organic components in the autoclave headspace.
When the liquid injection facility was used the autoclave was charged with the liquid components of the liquid reaction composition excluding part of the acetic acid and water charge in which the iridium catalyst (H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6) was dissolved.
When the solid catalyst injection facility was used the autoclave was charged with the liquid components of the liquid reaction composition while the catalyst (IrCl.sub.3.hydrate) was charged to a small glass vial which was placed in the injection facility which injection facility was fitted to the underside of the lid of the autoclave.
If a promoter was used, this was placed in the autoclave, covered with a portion of the acetic acid charge (5 to 20 g), and the autoclave sealed. The autoclave was then pressure tested with nitrogen and vented via a gas sampling system. The autoclave was flushed with carbon monoxide several times (3.times.3-10 barg). The remaining liquid components of the reaction composition were then charged to the autoclave via a liquid addition port. The autoclave was then pressurised with carbon monoxide (typically 6 barg) and heated with stirring (1500 rpm) to reaction temperature. The total pressure was then raised to approximately 3 barg below the desired operating pressure by feeding carbon monoxide from the ballast vessel. Once stable at temperature (about 15 minutes) the catalyst was injected (from either the liquid or solid injection facility) using an over pressure of carbon monoxide. The reactor pressure was maintained constant (.+-.0.5 barg) by feeding carbon monoxide gas from the ballast vessel throughout the course of the experiment. Gas uptake from the ballast vessel was measured using datalogging facilities throughout the course of the experiment. The reaction temperature was maintained within .+-.1.degree. C. of the desired reaction temperature by means of a heating mantle connected to a Magus (Trade Mark) control system. In addition, excess heat of reaction was removed by means of cooling coils. At the end of the experiment the ballast vessel was isolated from the autoclave and the autoclave was crash cooled by means of the cooling coils. Gases in the head space of the autoclave were then sampled and analysed by gas chromatography. IrC1.sub.3.hydrate and H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 (22.2% w/w Ir aqueous solution) were supplied by Johnson Matthey.
Experiments A-D and Examples 1-5
The components of the reaction composition which were charged to the autoclave and to the liquid/solid injection facility for Experiments A-D and Examples 1-5 are shown in Table 1.
Reactions were performed using the procedure given above. The temperature and pressure at which Experiments A-D and Examples 1-5 were performed are given in Table 2 together with rate data at 26, 16 and 6% by weight calculated methyl acetate concentrations.
The results of the analyses of the non-condensable gases vented at the end of the experiments are given in Table 3.
Experiments A to D are not examples according to the present invention because no rhenium promoter was present in the liquid reaction composition.
Example 1 is an Example according to the present invention and demonstrates the benefit of about 4 molar equivalents of rhenium promoter to iridium catalyst on reaction rate at a reaction pressure of 20 barg and at a temperature of 195.degree. C.
Example 2 is an Example according to the present invention and shows that at a reaction pressure of 20 barg and at a temperature of 190.degree. C. the presence of about 2 molar equivalents of rhenium promoter to iridium catalyst has a beneficial effect on reaction rate. Example 3 is also an Example according to the present invention and demonstrates the benefit of an increase in the molar ratio of rhenium promoter to iridium catalyst on carbonylation rates.
Experiments E-I and Example 6-13
Further experiments were performed as above using a different autoclave but of the same capacity and construction as for previous experiments. Temperature control was by means of a Eurotherm (Trade Mark) controller. The experimental procedure was the same as before but only a liquid injection facility was used. In these experiments and examples it was determined that only 80% of the iridium catalyst solution was injected. The injection efficiency in the previous experiments was not determined.
The liquid reaction composition at the end of the experiment was analysed by gas chromatography.
The autoclave charges are given in Table 4, rate data in Table 5, by-products in Tables 6 and 7, and products of Experiment E and Example 12 in Table 8.
These experiments show the promotional effect of rhenium on an iridium-catalysed carbonylation process over a range of total reaction pressures. The results of the Experiments also show that under these conditions rhenium alone is not an effective carbonylation catalyst.
The data given in Table 8 show that in the absence of iridium (Experiment E) methyl acetate is recovered from the autoclave essentially unreacted, except for a small amount of methyl acetate which is hydrolysed to acetic acid and methanol under the reaction conditions. In agreement with this observation no carbon monoxide was observed to be taken up from the ballast vessel. In contrast, in the presence of both iridium and rhenium (Example 12) the major product is acetic acid.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The carbonylation rates plotted against calculated methyl acetate concentration for Experiment H and Example 8 are shown in graph form in FIG. 1.

Comparison of Example 1 with Examples 4 and 5 shows that the promotional effect of rhenium on iridium-catalysed carbonylation is relatively greater at lower total pressure and hence lower partial pressure of carbon monoxide, but Example 7 shows that a promotional effect may be obtained at a total pressure in the carbonylation reactor at least as high as 28 barg. Similarly, compare Experiments F & G and Example 7 (28 barg) with Experiment K and Example 12 (19 barg).
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________Autoclave charge. MeOAc AcOH Amount Total chargeExperiment (g) (g) MeI (g) Water (g) Promoter (g) Catalyst Amount (g)__________________________________________________________________________Experiment A 48.0 79.8 7.5 14.1 -- -- IrCl.sub.3.hydrate 0.29 149.7Example 1 48.0 79.3 7.5 14.1 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1.02 IrCl.sub.3.hydrate 0.29 150.2Experiment B 48.0 75.1 8.5 17.1 -- -- H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6.sup.a 1.51 150.2Experiment C 48.0 75.1 8.5 17.1 -- -- H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 1.51 150.2Example 2 48.0 72.6 8.5 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 2.38 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 1.51 150.0Example 3 47.8 64.8 12.7.sup.b 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 4.76 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 1.51 148.6Experiment D 48.1 80.2 7.6 14.0 -- -- IrCl.sub.3.hydrate 0.29 150.2Example 4 48.0 79.7 7.6 14.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 0.50 IrCl.sub.3.hydrate 0.29 150.1Example 5 48.0 79.7 7.5 14.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1.02 IrCl.sub.3.hydrate 0.29 150.5__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Weight expressed as pure H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 .sup.b Extra MeI added, 2 molar equivalents per mole of Re metal.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Rate data Molar Rate (mol/l/hr) Rate (mol/l/hr) Rate (mol/l/hr) Pressure Temp Ir! equivalents of at 26% MeOAc at 16% MeOAc at 6% MeOAcExperiment (barg) (.degree.C.) (ppm) Additive metal to Ir concentration concentration concentration__________________________________________________________________________Experiment A 20 195 1050 -- -- 5.0 4.2 1.7Example 1 20 195 1050 Re 4 7.4 5.2 2.5Experiment B 20 190 4750 -- -- 18.2 13.1 6.7Experiment C 20 190 4750 -- -- 17.1 12.5 6.9Example 2 20 190 4750 Re 2 18.7 14.2 8.3Example 3 20 190 4750 Re 4 21.7 15.7 7.9Experiment 28 195 1050 -- -- 11.0 7.6 3.4D.sup.aExample 4.sup.a 28 195 1050 Re 2 10.9 7.6 2.8Example 5.sup.a 28 195 1050 Re 4 11.3 7.7 3.3__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Mean of two identical experiments.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Gaseous by-products Molar Pressure equivalents of Hydrogen CO.sub.2 MethaneExperiment (barg) Additive metal to Ir (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v)__________________________________________________________________________Experiment A 20 -- -- 1.2 1.5 4.1Example I 20 Re 4 1.3 2.1 5.5Experiment B 20 -- -- -- -- --Experiment C 20 -- -- 1.1 2.6 6.7Example 2 20 Re 2 1.6 3.1 10.0Example 3 20 Re 4 1.4 4.5 10.2Experiment D 28 -- -- 1.7 1.8 3.8Example 4.sup.a 28 Re 2 2.5 1.8 3.7Example 5.sup.a 28 Re 4 2.2 4.4 3.7__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Mean of two identical experiments. .sup.b All reactions conducted for a period of 1 hour. Analysis is of col (ambient temp.) vented offgas.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Autoclave charge. MeOAc Amount Catalyst Total chargeExperiment (g) AcOH (g) Mel (g) Water (g) Additive (g) Catalyst (g).sup.a (g)__________________________________________________________________________E 48.0 76.6 6.3 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 2.05 -- -- 150.0F 48.0 77.1 7.4 17.0 -- -- H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.65 150.2G 48.0 77.1 7.3 17.0 -- -- H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.64 150.06 48.0 76.2 7.4 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1.03 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.65 150.37 48.0 75.0 7.3 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 2.04 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.65 150.0H 48.0 76.9 8.6 16.1 -- -- H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.64 150.2I 48.0 77.1 7.4 17.1 -- -- H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.65 150.38 48.0 75.1 7.3 17.1 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 2.05 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.65 150.2K 48.0 77.1 7.4 17.0 -- -- H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.65 150.29 48.0 76.9 7.3 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 0.51 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.64 150.410 48.1 76.1 7.4 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1.03 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.64 150.311 48.1 76.0 7.3 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1.03 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.65 150.112 48.0 75.0 7.5 17.0 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 2.05 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.64 150.213 48.2 74.8 7.3 17.0 Re(CO).sub.5 Cl 2.25 H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6 0.64 150.2__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Weight expressed as pure H.sub.2 IrCl.sub.6.
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Rate data.sup.a Rate (mol/l/hr) Rate (mol/l/hr) Rate (mol/l/hr) Pressure Temp Re! at 26% MeOAc at 16% MeOAc at 6% MeOAcExperiment (barg) (.degree.C.) Additive (ppm) concentration concentration concentration__________________________________________________________________________E 28 190 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 -- -- --F 28 190 -- -- 12.4 9.2 3.8G 28 190 -- -- 11.8 9.3 4.06 28 190 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 3900 12.0 9.8 4.37 28 190 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 15.2 11.4 5.0H 22 190 -- -- 8.8 7.9 3.1I 22 190 -- -- 8.7 7.5 3.28 22 190 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 12.8 9.0 4.3K 19 190 -- -- 7.9 6.5 2.89 19 190 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1900 8.5 7.0 2.910 19 190 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 3900 10.1 8.3 3.911 19 190 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 3900 10.3 7.6 3.212 19 190 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 10.8 9.1 3.913 19 190 Re(CO).sub.5 Cl 7700 9.4 7.9 3.4__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Iridium concentration 1600 ppm at t = 0 based upon a catalyst inject efficiency of 80%. Stirrer speed 1500 rpm.
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Gaseous by-products.sup.a Pressure Re! Reaction time Hydrogen CO.sub.2 MethaneExperiment (barg) Additive (ppm) (minutes) (mmol) (mmol) (mmol)__________________________________________________________________________E 28 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 38 3.1 0.3 0.3F 28 -- -- 39 5.9 5.2 5.5G 28 -- -- 57 5.6 4.9 6.76 28 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 3900 38 6.2 5.1 6.97 28 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 39 7.0 7.0 10.6H 22 -- -- 58 4.3 6.0 9.7I 22 -- -- 48 4.0 5.7 11.48 22 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 39 4.8 5.4 11.1__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Analysis is of cold (ambient temperature) vented offgas.
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________Liquid by-products.sup.a Pressure Reaction time EtOAc EtI Propionic acidExperiment (barg) Additive Re! (ppm) (minutes) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)__________________________________________________________________________E 28 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 38 10 47 5F 28 -- -- 39 215 207 12G 28 -- -- 57 196 333 146 28 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 3900 38 230 189 147 28 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 39 273 381 75H 22 -- -- 58 207 240 55I 22 -- -- 48 198 165 848 22 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 39 266 181 20K 19 -- -- 63 218 238 159 19 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1900 56 198 161 5010 19 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 3900 47 244 198 1611 19 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 3900 57 291 359 8812 19 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 7800 47 263 237 1713 19 Re(CO).sub.5 Cl 7700 47 148 198 10__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Trace levels, typically < 2 ppm, of acetaldehyde were also found except for Experiment E which contained 50 ppm acetaldehyde.
TABLE 8______________________________________Analysis of final liquid reaction composition Methyl Acetic acid Iodide Methyl acetate MethanolExperiment (% w/w) (% w/w) (% w/w) (% w/w)______________________________________Experiment E 54.7 3.3 28.3 1.3Example 12 90.3 2.7 1.3 --______________________________________
Rhodium-Catalysed Carbonylations
A 150 ml Hastelloy B2 (Trade Mark) autoclave equipped with a Magnedrive (Trade Mark) stirrer, liquid injection facility and cooling coils was used for a series of batch carbonylation experiments. A gas supply to the autoclave was provided from a gas ballast vessel, feed gas being provided to maintain the autoclave at a constant pressure. The rate of gas uptake was calculated (with an accuracy believed to be .+-./-1%) from the rate at which the pressure falls in the gas ballast vessel.
For each batch carbonylation experiment the autoclave was charged with the rhenium promoter where appropriate and the liquid components of the liquid reaction composition excluding part of the acetic acid charge, in which the rhodium catalyst was dissolved.
The autoclave was flushed twice with nitrogen (28 barg), and was then heated with stirring (1000 rpm) to 185.degree. C. On attaining a temperature of 185 .degree. C. nitrogen was introduced into the autoclave to achieve a desired pressure, which pressure was less than the final reaction pressure. The gas feed lines to the autoclave were then vented free of nitrogen and were filled with carbon monoxide. After allowing the system to stabilise for about 30 minutes, the rhodium catalyst in acetic acid solution, or acetic acid and methyl acetate solution, was then injected into the autoclave under pressure of carbon monoxide. The autoclave was subsequently maintained at a desired pressure in the range 27 to 28 barg by feeding carbon monoxide gas on demand from the gas ballast vessel through the liquid injection facility. The partial pressure of carbon monoxide employed in the experiment was calculated by subtracting the observed pressure when nitrogen was first introduced to the autoclave from the final reaction pressure.
Gas uptake from the ballast vessel was measured every 30 seconds and from this was calculated the rate of carbonylation, expressed as moles of carbon monoxide consumed per litre of cold degassed liquid reaction composition per hour (mol/1/hr). In the examples the concentrations of components such as methyl acetate and water in the reaction composition during the carbonylation reaction may be calculated from the starting composition assuming that one mole of reactant is consumed for every mole of carbon monoxide that is consumed. After tiptake of carbon monoxide from the ballast vessel had ceased or the period of the reaction had proceeded for 40 minutes, whichever was sooner, the autoclave was isolated from the gas supply. The autoclave as subsequently cooled to room temperature and the gases were cautiously vented from the autoclave and analysed by gas chromatography. The liquid reaction composition was then discharged from the autoclave, sampled and was analysed by gas chromatography for liquid products and by-products.
To obtain a reliable baseline a number of identical baseline runs may have to be performed to condition the autoclave such that consistent rates are achieved. This conditioning period is often different from autoclave to autoclave and may depend upon its previous history.
Experiments L-N and Example 14
The components of the reaction composition which were charged to the autoclave and to the liquid injection facility for Experiments L-N and Example 14 are shown in Table 9.
Reactions were performed using the procedure given above. The temperature and pressure at which Experiments L-N and Example 14 were performed are given in Table 10 together with the carbon monoxide partial pressure and carbonylation rate data after a reaction time of 5 minutes.
The results of the analyses of the vented gases at the end of the experiments are given in Table 11. In all the experiments acetic acid was the major product (selectivity 99% by weight).
Experiments L and M are not examples according to the present invention because no rhenium promoter was present in the liquid reaction composition. In both Experiments L and M there was evidence of significant catalyst precipitation when the autoclave was opened at the end of the experiment.
Experiment N is not an example according to the present invention because no rhodium catalyst was present in the liquid reaction composition. In this experiment nitrogen was not introduced to the autoclave on attaining a temperature of 185.degree. C. and before carbon monoxide was fed to the autoclave. Thus, the partial pressure of carbon monoxide was higher than in Experiments L and M. This experiment showed that even under a relatively high partial pressure of carbon monoxide, rhenium alone did not act as a carbonylation catalyst.
Example 14 is an example according to the present invention because both rhenium promoter and rhodium catalyst were present in the liquid reaction composition. There was little evidence of catalyst precipitation on opening the autoclave at the end of the experiment. This example demonstrates that addition of rhenium promoter to the liquid reaction composition affords the benefits of improved catalyst stability and increase in carbonylation rate. The improved catalyst stability demonstrated in Example 14 will be particularly beneficial during separation of the carboxylic acid product from the catalyst during product recovery stages in which carbon monoxide partial pressure is less than that in the carbonylation reaction.
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Autoclave charge. MeOAc AcOH MeI Water Amount CatalystExperiment (mmol) (mmol).sup.a (mmol) (mmol) Promoter (mmol) Catalyst (mmol).sup.b__________________________________________________________________________Experiment L 244 704 101 911 -- -- Rh.sub.2 (CO).sub.4 Cl.sub.2 0.20Experiment M 244 703 102 911 -- -- Rh.sub.2 (CO).sub.4 Cl.sub.2 0.20Experiment N 244 786 102 911 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1.98 -- --Example 14 244 702 102 912 Re.sub.2 (CO).sub.10 1.97 Rh.sub.2 (CO).sub.4 Cl.sub.2 0.20__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a charged to the autoclave at the start of the experiment .sup.b dissolved in acetic acid (83 mmol)
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________Rate data.sup.a Rate (mol/l/hr) at 18% w/w calculated Methyl Carbon Partial Pressure of Carbon Concentration monoxide Pressure Monoxide (barg) at start of Temp Rate (mol/l/hr) In Reaction consumed % MeOAcExperiment (barg) reaction (.degree.C.) after 5 minutes Composition (mmol) consumed.sup.a__________________________________________________________________________Experiment L 27.5 4.8 185 3.6 3.4 104.sup.b 43Experiment M 27.3 4.3 185 2.4 2.1 56.sup.b 23Experiment N 28.0.sup.d unknown 185 0 0 0.sup.c 0Example 14 27.4 4.4 185 4.5 4.6 199.sup.c 82__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a based on carbon monoxide gas uptake data. .sup.b after reaction ceased. .sup.c reaction was stopped after 40 minutes. .sup.d on attaining a temperature of 185.degree. C. the system was allowe to stabilise for about 30 minutes before the autoclave was pressurised with carbon monoxide gas only.
TABLE 11______________________________________By-products Gaseous By-products.sup.a (% v/v)Experiment CO.sub.2 Methane______________________________________Experiment L 4.3 9.5Experiment M 4.0 9.3Experiment N trace 1.3Example 14 3.5 10.9______________________________________ .sup.a Compositions expressed as % by volume of measurable gas including balance of nitrogen and carbon monoxide but excluding hydrogen which is not measurable by this analysis.

Number	Date	Country	Kind
9503384	Feb 1995	GBX
9503386	Feb 1995	GBX

Number	Name	Date
3769329	Paulik et al.	Oct 1973
3772380	Paulik et al.	Nov 1973
4746640	Erpenbach et al.	May 1988
4804791	Kitson et al.	Feb 1989
4918226	Pruett	Apr 1990
4985572	Kitson et al.	Jul 1991
5221751	Schreck	Jan 1994

Number	Date	Country
081152	Jun 1983	EPX
0350635	Jan 1990	EPX
0643034	Mar 1991	EPX
0618184	Oct 1994	EPX
3148006	Jun 1983	DEX
51-065703	Jun 1976	JPX
51-080813	Jul 1976	JPX
57-081421	May 1982	JPX
58-144347	Aug 1983	JPX
58-167536	Oct 1983	JPX
1234642	Jun 1971	GBX
1234641	Jun 1971	GBX
1276326	Jun 1972	GBX

Process for the production of a carboxylic acid

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (2)

US Referenced Citations (7)

Foreign Referenced Citations (13)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)

Entry
P. Barret et al, "Reactivity of Solids": Proc. 10th International Symposium, J. Mol. Cat. 39 (1986) 137-138.
Brodski et al, J. Molec. Catalysis, 2 (1977) 149-14.
Smith et al, J. Molec. Catalysis, 39 (1987) 115-136.
Abel et al, J. Chem. Soc. 1958, pp. 3149-3152.