The invention related to a process and a device for the production of a three-dimensional object by layer-wise solidification of a photohardening material by mask illumination by means of a rastered image forming unit having constant resolution, wherein the resolution within the image/construction plane shall be improved in the sub-pixel range.
For the layer-wise construction of three-dimensional objects from “light hardening” materials, various processes are mentioned in literature, see in this respect “Automated Fabrication-Improving Productivity in Manufacturing” of Marshall Burns, 1993 (ISBN 0-13-119462-3).
This invention relates to processes wherein the layer to be generated is based on illumination by means of a rastered mask, wherein the smallest physical resolution within the mask is provided by the size of a pixel.
Known possibilities presently are, inter alia, illumination by
Some of these methods are described in the following patents:
IPC: B29C67/00 “Rapid Prototyping apparatus and method of Rapid Prototyping” of Dicon AS (DK), (application)
US patent US005247180 A “Stereolithographic Apparatus and Method of use” of Texas Instruments Inc., September 1993.
US patent US005980813 A “Rapid Prototyping using multiple materials” of SRI International, November 1999;
Utility Model DE G 93 19 405.6 “Device for the production of a three-dimensional object (model) according to the principle of photosolidification” of Research Center Informatik at the University Karlsruhe, Dez. 1993;
An application for the generation of micro-technical, three-dimensional construction parts according to a similar process is described in the Utility Model DE 299 11 122 U1 “Device for the production of a three-dimensional object” DeltaMed et al., June 1999.
PCT Application 02 008 019.8 “Device for the production of a three-dimensional object” of Envision Technologies GmbH, April 2002.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,180,050 describes a linear scan technique for layer-wise solidification in the production of three-dimensional objects. The resolution is enhanced by scanning, in X-direction, an illumination head having an array of optical fibers, which are displaced in the Y-direction.
With all of the above described processes, the resolution of the material layer to be hardened is in direct dependency from the resolution of an image forming process.
With the projection processes, an intermediary positioned optic additionally determines the scale of the projected or solidifiable layer.
The resolution per area unit in the image/construction plane thus is dependent on a) the resolution of the image forming unit or the smallest element, called pixel, and their relative mutual distances, called pixel-pitch, and b) the projection scale.
The surface roughness of the construction part thus is determined by the smallest volume unit of one voxel (volume-pixel), the size of which is composed of the projected pixel area in XY and the layer thickness in Z. The resolution of the layer thickness is prescribed by the smallest resolution (step level) of the actuator in Z, in order to move the support platform. Resolutions already down to the one-figure μm range is achievable hereby. If an even lower surface roughness of the construction part shall be realized, the projection field and concurrently the width of the pixel area must be down-sized.
As an example, the projection m.H. of a multi-media projector shall be mentioned here; with a resolution of XGA (1024×768 image dots), a pixel of 17 μm and pixel-pitch of 17.9 μm, one realizes, at a projection to 275 mm×206 mm with an enhancement factor of the projection optic of 15, a resolution in the image/construction plane and thus in the layer to be solidified of approximately 100 dpi, which corresponds to a pixel size in the projection plane of about 0.254 mm×0.254 mm.
In order to e.g. double the resolution in the image-/construction plane, while maintaining the same construction area, it is proposed in the projection processes to half the projection/enhancement factor (which means to quarter the area) and, for the illumination of the four partial planes, to shift either the whole projection unit or the construction space mutually in parallel.
This process has the significant drawback that relatively high masses have to be moved towards each other very precisely in order to ensure an exact abutment and a close connection of the partial planes, which means a considerable expenditure of costs and additional need of space in the whole arrangement for the mechanics required therefore.
With the selective direct illumination by scanning m.H. of a LED- or laser-diode-line/-matrix or direct illumination by a mask, which is formed by a transmissive LCD, the resolution in the construction plane is equivalent to the resolution in the image forming unit.
It is an object of the invention to provide a process or a device which can enhance the resolution in the construction plane, while maintaining the same large construction area, many times in the sub-pixel range, i.e. to refine the rastering of the outer and inner contours in the sectional planes of the object,
The present invention provides a process for the production of a three-dimensional object by layer-wise solidification of a material solidifiable by the action of electromagnetic irradiation by means of mask illumination, wherein the mask is produced by an image forming unit having a prescribed resolution, which mask is formed from a constant number of image forming elements (pixel) being discrete and spatially arranged in a fixed manner to each other, characterized in that, for improving the resolution in the sub-pixel range along the outer and inner contours of the sectional areas of the object to be generated layer-wise, a multiple illumination is carried out for each layer which consists of a sequence of a multitude of images mutually shifted in the sub-pixel range in the image/construction plane, wherein a separate mask/bitmap is produced for each shifted image.
The invention also provides a device for the production of a three-dimensional object by layer-wise solidification of a material which is solidifiable under the application of electromagnetic irradiation by means of mask illumination, whereby the irradiation necessary for hardening is imaged into the image/construction plane, wherein the device comprises a rastered, image forming unit for the selective illumination, which is embodied either by line or by matrix, characterized in that the image forming unit composes the image from individual image dots (pixels) and thus forms a rastered mask (bitmap), wherein the pixels are arranged within the plane in a manner mutually fixed to each other, and that the image forming unit and/or an imaging optic which is provided between the image forming unit and the image/construction plane is/are designed such that a sequence of a multitude of images, which are mutually shifted in a sub-pixel range, can be created, wherein a separate mask/bitmap can be produced for each shifted image.
Preferred embodiments of the process of the present invention include one or more of the following features:
Preferred embodiments of the device of the present invention include one or more of the following features:
By means of the process of the invention or the device of the invention, the resolution in the image/construction plane is improved in the sub-pixel range by means of “pixel-shift”.
In particular, the present invention deals with the layer-wise solidification for the production of three-dimensional objects or construction elements by means of solidification of material (specifically by means of photo-polymerization) through mask projection, but not with a conventional layer-wise solidification through (linear) scan technique. This can be carried out according to the invention very efficiently and advantageously by using a two-dimensionally set array as the image generating element, wherein raster and/or resolution is(are) preset, e.g. by means of a set micro mirror array.
Compared to the scan technique, which is called VAROS (Variable Refraction Optical System) by Canon and “Double-CCD” by Epson, the principle of reading and overlapping of images mutually shifted in the sub-pixel range is used in this invention for rastered image forming processes of rapid prototyping.
The resolution or the number of image dots of the rastered, image forming unit itself does not have to be increased in order to realize an improvement in the solution within the construction plane.
For the enhancement of the resolution, the illumination does not occur in correspondingly down-sized, adjacently disposed partial areas, whereby the construction/illumination period for the whole area would be increased by the number of partial areas; rather, the projection/illumination occurs over the whole construction area.
By the measure that an overlapping of images that are mutually shifted in the sub-pixel range takes place, the construction/illumination period of the whole area increases only insubstantially.
The level of resolution improvement within the construction plane can be chosen freely.
The present invention will be explained in detail in the following by way of examples and not in a limiting manner by means of drawings.
By a simple example,
The sectional area, i.e. the outer and inner contours, are prescribed by a sectorial trail 11, which is superimposed by a rastered area (bitmap) 12, the solution of which exactly corresponds to the resolution of the discrete elements (pixels) within the projected image 8 which is formed by the image forming matrix. Vectorial trail 11 and bitmap 12 thus exist within a superior-ordered XY-coordinate system 10.
In
In
A simplified process for resolution improvement is achieved by the measure that only bitmap 12 of the started position (
Depending on the resolution improvement desired for each object layer, a multiple (at least twice) of masks or bitmaps having different sub-pixel shifts can be generated and superimposed.
By means of a differently shifted and superimposed illumination of each object/material layer (here by means of bitmaps 12, 14, 16, 18), a resolution improvement in XY in the portion of outer and inner contours is achieved. In order to realize respective sub-pixel shifts in the image within the construction plane, the following various embodiments are described:
The embodiments 1) to 5) or a) to c) described above can be realized individually or combined with each other.
The bitmaps of each individual layer necessary for mask projection are generated from layer data, in which the outer and inner contours of the respective object section is represented in vectorial trails (as e.g. defined in the data format CLI).
For this, a specific SW is used which carries out the transformation of the vectorial trails into the bitmap format (bitmapping).
For each sub-pixel shift in XY, a separate bitmap is generated by transforming the XY coordinates of the vectors (for the outer and the inner contours) of the layer data by the respective shift-offset in XY (in the sub-pixel range), and by superposing them over the bitmap-raster, and thus by calculating a new distribution of active pixels for each shift.
The projected light output per pixel can be varied by “grey scaling” within a projection mask, in order to selectively influence the hardening level in one layer thereby. This is particularly meaningful in order to raise the light output of the pixels of the contour because only partial superimposition of the respective pixels of the contour are produced here due to the sub-pixel shift over individual bitmaps (in the areas within the contours a complete superimposition of the pixels of each individual bitmap is ensured).
When projecting/superimposing the section images shifted by sub-pixels, an almost homogeneous distribution of the light output or the illumination intensity can be achieved by means of the superimposition of grey scalings, particularly along the contours of the projected area structure, through the sum of the grey scaling masks.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 022 961 | May 2004 | DE | national |
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/569,893, filed on May 10, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4837379 | Weinberg | Jun 1989 | A |
4929402 | Hull | May 1990 | A |
4999143 | Hull et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5093130 | Fujii et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5137662 | Hull et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5143663 | Leyden et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5173266 | Kenney | Dec 1992 | A |
5174931 | Almquist et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5236637 | Hull | Aug 1993 | A |
5247180 | Mitcham et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5248456 | Evans, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5254979 | Trevett et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263130 | Pomerantz et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268994 | Keskes | Dec 1993 | A |
5298208 | Sibley et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306446 | Howe | Apr 1994 | A |
5345391 | Hull et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5360981 | Owen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5391072 | Lawton et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5437820 | Brotz | Aug 1995 | A |
5447822 | Hull et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5510077 | Dinh et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5529473 | Lawton et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545367 | Bae et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569431 | Hull | Oct 1996 | A |
5571471 | Hull | Nov 1996 | A |
5630981 | Hull | May 1997 | A |
5651934 | Almquist et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653925 | Batchelder | Aug 1997 | A |
5823778 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5858746 | Hubbell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5891382 | Almquist et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894036 | Tylko | Apr 1999 | A |
5897825 | Fruth et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902537 | Almquist et al. | May 1999 | A |
5943235 | Earl et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5980813 | Narang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013099 | Dinh et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027324 | Hull | Feb 2000 | A |
6048487 | Almquist et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051179 | Hagenau | Apr 2000 | A |
6078038 | Cooper | Jun 2000 | A |
6124858 | Ge et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6158946 | Miyashita | Dec 2000 | A |
6171610 | Vacanti et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180050 | Arai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6280727 | Prior et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6334865 | Redmond et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352710 | Sawhney et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6391245 | Smith | May 2002 | B1 |
6500378 | Smith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501483 | Wong et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508971 | Leyden et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6547552 | Fudim | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6600965 | Hull et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630009 | Moussa et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6764636 | Allanic et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6833231 | Moussa et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833234 | Bloomstein et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6942830 | Mulhaupt et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963319 | Pate et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974656 | Hinczewski | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989225 | Steinmann | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7034811 | Allen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7052263 | John | May 2006 | B2 |
7128866 | Henningsen | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7195472 | John | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7403213 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7467939 | Sperry et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7758799 | Hull et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7790093 | Shkolnik et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010028495 | Quate et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010048183 | Fujita | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020028854 | Allanic et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020155189 | John | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030074096 | Das et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030173714 | Ueno | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030205849 | Farnworth | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008309 | Yamahara et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027363 | Allen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028293 | Allen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050023710 | Brodkin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050208168 | Hickerson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248061 | Shkolnik et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050248062 | Shkolnik et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259785 | Zhang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288813 | Yang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060078638 | Holmboe et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060192312 | Wahlstrom | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060239588 | Hull et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249884 | Partanen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070074659 | Wahlstrom | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070075458 | Wahlstrom et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070075459 | Reynolds et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070075460 | Wahlstrom et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070075461 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070077323 | Stonesmith et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070257055 | Scott et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070259066 | Sperry et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080038396 | John et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054531 | Kerekes et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080169586 | Hull et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169589 | Sperry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170112 | Hull et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179786 | Sperry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179787 | Sperry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181977 | Sperry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080206383 | Hull et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217818 | Holmboe et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080226346 | Hull et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231731 | Hull et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080309665 | Gregory, II et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4105314 | Aug 1991 | DE |
4102257 | Jul 1992 | DE |
4125534 | Feb 1993 | DE |
93 19 405.6 | May 1994 | DE |
9319405.6 | May 1994 | DE |
4340108 | Sep 1997 | DE |
197 16 240 | Oct 1998 | DE |
19716240 | Oct 1998 | DE |
197 27 554 | Jan 1999 | DE |
19727554 | Jan 1999 | DE |
299 11 122 | Nov 1999 | DE |
29911122 | Nov 1999 | DE |
19838797 | Mar 2000 | DE |
199 29 199 | Jan 2001 | DE |
19929199 | Jan 2001 | DE |
19929199 | Feb 2001 | DE |
10003374 | Aug 2001 | DE |
100 18 987 | Oct 2001 | DE |
10018987 | Oct 2001 | DE |
20106887 | Oct 2001 | DE |
69909136 | May 2004 | DE |
102004022961 | Dec 2005 | DE |
0 250 121 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0250121 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0426363 | May 1991 | EP |
0 435 564 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0435564 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0 466 422 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0466422 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 484 086 | May 1992 | EP |
0484086 | May 1992 | EP |
0 958 912 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0958912 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 250 997 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1250997 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 270 185 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1270185 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 192 041 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1192041 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 156 922 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1156922 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1674243 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1 849 587 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1849587 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 880 830 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1880830 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1 894 704 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1894704 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1 950 032 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1950032 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2 011 631 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2011631 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2254194 | Jul 1975 | FR |
2583334 | Dec 1986 | FR |
2 692 053 | Dec 1993 | FR |
2692053 | Dec 1993 | FR |
04371829 | Dec 1992 | JP |
04371829 | Dec 1992 | JP |
08192469 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08192469 | Jul 1996 | JP |
WO 9511007 | Apr 1995 | WF |
9511007 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9515841 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9515841 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9600422 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO-9600422 | Jan 1996 | WO |
0021735 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0021735 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0100390 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0112679 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO-0112679 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0172501 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0172501 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0227408 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0227408 | Apr 2002 | WO |
03059184 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03059184 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Opposition to EP 1,849,587, dated Apr. 8, 2010. |
C. Sun, et al., “Projection Micro-Stereolithography Using Digital Micro-Mirror Dynamic mask,” Sensors and Actuators A 121 (2005) 113-120. |
S. Ventura, et al., “Freeform Fabrication of Functional Silicon Nitride Components by Direct Photoshaping,” Mat Res. Sol. Symp. Proc., vol. 625 (2000). |
K. Takahashi, “A New Application of DMD to Photolithography and Rapid Prototyping System,” Institute of Electronics, Information, and Communication Engineers. |
Wohlers Report 2000. “Rapid Prototyping & Tooling State of the Industry Annual Worldwide Progress Report”, T. Wohlers, Wohlers Association, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado (2000). |
Stark, G.B., et al., “Biological Matrices and Tissue Reconstruction,” Springer Publications, Berlin (1998). |
Sachs, E., et al., “Three Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from CAD Model,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, 114:481-488 (1992). |
Kuhtreiber, W., Ph.D., et al., “Cell Encapsulation Technology and Therapeutics,” Birkhauser, Boston (1998). |
Landers, R., and Mulhaupt, R., “Desktop Manufacturing of Complex Objects, Prototypes and Biomedical Scaffolds by means of Computer-Assisted Design Combined with Computer-Guided 3D Plotting of Polymers and Reactive Oligomers,” Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 282:17-22 (2000). |
Okada, T., and Ikada, Y., “Tissue Reactions to Subcutaneously Implanted, Surface-Modified Silicones,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 27:1509-1518 (1993). |
Relou, I.A., et al., “Effect of Culture Conditions on Endothelial Cell Growth and Responsiveness,” Tissue & Cell, 30(5):525-538 (1998). |
Nikolaychik, V.V., et al., A New, Cryoprecipitate Based Coating for Improved Endothelial Cell Attachment and Growth on Medical Grade Artificial Surfaces:, ASAIO Journal, 40:M846-M852 (1994). |
Burns, “Automatic Fabrication Improving Productivity in Manufacturing”, 1993 (ISBN 0-13-119462-3). |
IEEE Super Resolution article abstract vol. 20, issue 3, pp. 21-36, May 2003. |
37 CFR 1.99 Submission and declaration. |
http:/www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2004/040609a.html “HP technology doubles the resolution of digital projection displays” Jun. 9, 2004. |
4 W. Allen, R. Ulichney “Wobulation: Doubling the Addressed Resolution,” SID 05 Digest, 2005. |
Wobulation, saved as PDF from the internet; wikipedia definition, citing several resolution-relate patents. |
3D Systems, Inc. v. Envisiontec, Inc., et al. Special Masters Report and Recommendation on the Parties' Summary Judgement Motions. |
International Search Report (German Translation) for PCT/EP2005/005003, dated Oct. 5, 2004. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/EP2008/009041, dated Apr. 27, 2010. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2008/009041, dated Apr. 27, 2007. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2008/009040, dated Feb. 4, 2009. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2008/009040, dated Feb. 4, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60569893 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11126068 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 13230270 | US |