The disclosures of all of the above patent publications and applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. This invention was made with no U.S. Government support and the U.S. Government has no rights in this invention.
The present invention relates to the field of coal processing, and more specifically to a carbonization process for treating various types of coal for the production of higher value coal-derived products, such as coal char, coal liquids or oils, gaseous fuels, water and heat. More specifically, the present invention relates to processes and apparatus for the more efficient recovery of (1) coal-derived liquids (CDLs) from the gases driven off, and (2) the char produced from coal during pyrolysis. It is applicable to bituminous, sub-bituminous and non-agglomerating lignite ranks of coal.
Coal in its virgin state is sometimes treated to improve its usefulness and thermal energy content. The treatment can include drying the coal and subjecting the coal to a pyrolysis process to drive off low boiling point organic compounds and heavier organic compounds. This thermal treatment of coal, also known as low temperature coal carbonization, causes the release of certain volatile hydrocarbon compounds having value for further refinement into liquid fuels and other coal-derived liquids (CDLs) and chemicals. Subsequently, the volatile components can be removed from the effluent or gases exiting the pyrolysis process. Such thermal or pyrolytic treatment of coal causes it to be transformed into coal char by virtue of the evolution of the coal volatiles and products of organic sulfur decomposition. The magnetic susceptibilities of inorganic sulfur and iron in the resultant char are initiated for subsequent removal of such undesirable components as coal ash, inorganic sulfur and mercury from the coal char.
It would be advantageous if agglomerating or bituminous coal could be treated in such a manner that would enable volatile components to be effectively removed from the coal at more desirable concentrations, thereby creating a coal char product having reduced organic sulfur and mercury. It would be further advantageous if bituminous coal could be refined in such a manner to create a second revenue stream (i.e., condensable coal liquids), which could be recovered to produce syncrude and other valuable coal products.
For example, even CDLs collected and separated may contain undesirable particulate matter—as much as 5-10% by weight by some estimates. These small, micron-sized particulates are generally undesirable, particularly if the CDL is to be further processed or refined by additional equipment. Therefore it would be advantageous to remove significant portions of these fine particulates.
In a broad aspect, a process for treating coal is described. The process builds on low temperature coal carbonization to separate coal into multiple components, including: coal char, coal-derived liquids (CDLs), and a gaseous fuel also known as syngas. The CDLs are further fractionated into multiple components in some embodiments. For example, in one aspect the invention is a method for treating effluent gases evolved from a coal pyrolysis process, the method comprising:
passing the evolved gases through at least two distinct condensation zones, each zone being maintained at a different temperature to condense to liquids the different boiling point fractions of the evolved gases;
(optionally) directing the liquids from each condensation zone to one or more separation units to separate particulate sludge and/or impurities from the condensed liquids; and
directing the condensed liquids from each separation unit to its own separate storage tank, wherein the temperature of each condensing zone is controlled within a predetermined temperature range to collect a desired CDL fraction in each of the storage tanks.
In another aspect the invention is a method for treating effluent gases evolved from a coal pyrolysis process, the method comprising:
The methods may include further processing of any of the collected CDL, such as separation or purification by means such as centrifugation, filtration and the like. Particulates and sludge removed from the CDLs in these purification steps may be used in briquetting.
In other aspects the methods include further processing of the remaining gas stream after CDLs have been removed. For example, a portion of the gas stream may be re-cycled to the pyrolysis chamber(s) for use as a sweep gas to add direct heat. Another portion may be cooled to remove water vapor that remains and is stored as a dried gaseous fuel. Such a dried gaseous fuel has a high heating value, for example greater than 8,000 BTU/lb (20.4 MJ/kg). If being pumped long distances, it may be re-heated, for example to 50-70C, typically 55-65C, to reduce the likelihood of any components condensing in the conduits. The proportion for each such use can vary from 0 to 100%.
In another variation, the gas stream evolved from the absorber may be further processed with an electrostatic precipitator (ESP). The ESP can collect oil mist particles that are entrained in the stream and re-blend them with a light oil CDL fraction.
In a three zone absorber designed to collect and process CDLs from coal, the temperature set points for the three zones may include sequentially, from about 450F (232C) to about 550F (288C) for the heavy CDL fraction, from about 250F (121C) to about 400F (204C) for the middle CDL fraction, and from about 150F (65C) to about 250F (121C) for the light CDL fraction.
In another variation, the effluent gases from the pyrolysis process are first passed though a high temperature cyclone to remove char fines, and/or a venturi to mix and nucleate the heaviest condensable CDLs before they are admitted to the absorber. This step increases the capture of the desired CDL fraction in each zone by removal of nucleation sites for mist formation.
In another variation, any or all of the following fractions may be used as fuel and/or binder to form pellets or briquettes: the coal fines from the cyclone; the bottom bleeds from the highest temperature zone of the absorber; all or a portion of the heavy CDL fraction; all or a portion of the sludge and fines from optional purification of the CDLs.
Various other embodiments are described herein as well.
Various advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
The process pertains to treating non-agglomerating coal and various types of bituminous coal for the production of coal derived liquid (CDL) and other higher value coal derived products, such as a high calorific value, low volatile, low ash, low sulfur coal, also known as char, suitable for a variety of uses in industry, including metallurgical uses and power production, including forming the char into briquettes.
An optional drying step removes excessive moisture from the coal. The dried coal is then fed to a pyrolysis chamber where the coal is pyrolyzed as is known in the art at temperatures typically between about 500-600 C. Multiple pyrolysis stages may be used if desired. The pyrolysis is done with low oxygen and drives off impurities as evolved gases to improve the efficiency of the resulting coal as fuel, a process known as “beneficiation” of the coal.
Particle carryover in the effluent gas stream exiting from a pyrolysis chamber such as a fluidized bed has been estimated to be as high as about 15-20% by weight. These particles comprise char fines and quinoline insoluble particles. In one known example, these solids amounted to about 16.1% by weight. Consequently, the effluent gas stream may optionally pass through a high temperature, high efficiency cyclone separator 36 which separates out the carbon fine particulates 38. Solid particle loads can be reduced to as little as 1.0% by weight using such separators. Suitable cyclone separators are available from suppliers such as Ducon, 5 Penn Plaza, New York, N.Y.; Fisher-Klosterman, Louisville, Ky.; or Heumann Environmental, Jeffersonville, Ind. For example, some Heurmann units are designed to remove 95% of the minus 5 micron particulates carried in the pyrolysis effluent gas stream. The particulates 38 so removed from the effluent gas stream can be conveyed to a separate collection means or re-injected into the fluidized bed pyrolysis chamber. Preferably, the particulates 38 are transported from the separate collection means to be added downstream to the sludge and subsequently added to the coal char briquetting or shipped with the coal char in bulk form.
The evolved gases and any remaining particulates escaping the cyclone 36 are fed to the inlet of a variable throat venturi 40. During the condensation process, pure segmentation in fractionation is hampered by the formation of high boiling point (BP) mist or droplets which serve as nucleation sites, at which lower BP fractions may coalesce prematurely while still at high temperatures. It is desirable therefore, to separate remaining particulates and the high BP nucleates at an elevated temperature while the desirable lower boiling point hydrocarbon compounds are still vaporous. The venturi 40 may be operated from about 350C to 450C to remove these nucleates and cause forced nucleation of many of the high BP components. This may be followed by forcing the mist into the absorber 54 via a port 56 that is deliberately angled downwardly to the initial collection chamber 57 to prevent the high BP mist particles from continuing upward into the lower temperature condensing zones above. In testing, as much as 95% of the char fines and quinoline insoluble particulates were retained in with the high BP fraction in the lowest zone of the absorber 54.
The venturi 40 also serves to wet and mix the evolved gases. A source of fluid 42 may be heated or cooled as needed at heat exchangers 44, 46 fed by sources of heating fluid 48 or cooling fluid 50. The fluid source 42 is heated or cooled to a desired temperature (e.g. 350-500 C) in response to temperature sensor T, temperature control module TC, and temperature control valves TCV, and is then fed to the inlet of the venturi 40 to mix and wet the effluent gases 16. Pressure sensors, P, monitor the pressure above and below the throat of the venturi 40 and a pressure differential control module, DPC, adjusts the venturi throat to maintain a predetermined pressure differential. Such venturi devices suitable for use with the invention are available from: Sly, Inc., Strongsville, Ohio; Envitech, Inc. San Diego, Calif.; Monroe Environmental, Monroe, Mich.; and AirPol, Ramsey, N.J. The outlet of the venturi feeds line 52 which feeds the inlet of a quench tower or absorber 54 (See
The quench tower or absorber 54 condenses and separates volatile components from the evolved gases 16. According to an embodiment of the invention, the absorber 54 is divided into multiple condensation zones, i.e. two or more, preferably at least three zones. Referring to
Other than the temperature at which each zone is set to condense, the structure of each is similar, so that only zone B is described in detail herein, it being understood that each such zone will have similar structures and function. Liquid condensed in zone B drains into a chimney tray 58. The chimney tray 58 allows gas to pass through a multiplicity of chimney ducts or tubes while collecting the liquid in the volumetric space above the tray and surrounding the chimney ducts. The condensed liquid is drawn away from the chimney tray 58 by means of a pump 60, optionally through a valve 62 and strainer 64. A level meter L and a level control LC maintain the draw rate so as maintain a minimal threshold level at the bottom of zone B. The withdrawn liquid is carried to a heat exchanger 68 where it transfers its heat to a coolant fluid that is pumped through the heat exchanger 68 from a source 70 and to which it may return in a loop. A temperature sensor T monitors the temperature of the liquid exiting the heat exchanger 68 and temperature controller TC controls the temperature control valve TCV to control the flow of coolant to the heat exchanger 68.
A portion of the cooled fluid exiting the heat exchanger 68 is diverted back to the top of zone B and to sprayers 72 which spray the liquid onto the hot gases to initiate further condensation, thus completing the loop. A flow meter F and flow control FC control the flow control valve FCV to maintain a constant flow rate to the sprayers 72. The remainder of the cooled fluid exiting the heat exchanger 68 (process sampling point VII) is carried to an optional separator, such as centrifuge 74, for further processing that will be described momentarily.
Zones A and C have similar liquid sprayer loops that are cooled by heat exchangers and aid in condensation. These heat exchangers are conventional in using a coolant fluid to exchange heat with the hot gases thereby cooling them to condense the volatile components with boiling points below the target temperature range, while not condensing volatile components with lower boiling points. Thus, the temperature set points for zones A, B, and C are all likely to be different, however, with the set point decreasing in succession from A to C. Typical temperature ranges for a three zone absorber are discussed below. The excess condensed liquid from Zone A (process sampling point V) is carried to an optional separator, such as centrifuge 76, and the excess condensed liquid from Zone C (process sampling point IX) is carried to an optional separator, such as centrifuge 78. Also, bottoms may be bled from the strainer below Zone A, to combine with sludge and/or use as a binder in a subsequent pelleting or briquetting operation.
Although shown as a loop configuration in
Within each zone at the temperature (or range) of its set point, a certain fraction of the volatiles condense depending on their boiling points and vapor pressure within the mixture. Assuming a light CDL loop target temperature in Zone C of about 77 C+/−5, as shown in the schematic of
Suitable absorbers or quench towers are assembled from parts made by commercial suppliers such as Koch-Glitsch, LP, Wichita, Kans.; Sulzer Chemtech USA, Inc., Tulsa, Okla.; Raschig-Jaeger Products, Inc., Houston, Tex.; and others.
The gas stream leaving the precipitator 82 often contains traces of condensable hydrocarbon compounds and typically 20 to 30 weight % uncondensed moisture, the temperature typically at about 75 to 85C. For use as a fuel, it is desirable to remove some or most of the moisture and thereafter to reheat the gas to eliminate further condensation of either hydrocarbon compounds or water. Carryover of water is undesirable in the fuel as it lowers the calorific heating value of the fuel gas. Carryover of traces of condensable hydrocarbons which may condense in long gaseous fuel delivery conduits causing buildup and reduced flow path en-route to the fuel point of use is undesirable. Accordingly, the gas stream is then carried to a cooler 84 (
The noncondensable gas that exits the cooler 84 is known as syngas or gaseous fuel and generally is composed of hydrogen, carbon oxides, water, and C6 or shorter hydrocarbons. Table C (Below) lists many of these components. This process gas is sometimes burned off as flame, but may also be an important product gas itself. Optionally, this gas is reheated by a heat exchanger 88 to avoid condensation in long pipelines, and pumped by fan 90 to storage or to a location for further use, such as a fuel. The process gas may flow at typical rate of 6,000 to 10,000 kg/hour and may be reheated to about 60 C prior to being piped to a gas user.
In an important variation, a portion of the gas stream may be taken from a split point directly after the electrostatic precipitator 82 (process sampling point XIV) and pumped by fan 92 to the pyrolysis chamber(s) for use as a sweep gas without cooling. From 0% to 100% of the gas stream may be used for pyrolysis sweep gas, more typically from 40% to about 80%. If any portion of the gas stream is desired for pyrolysis, it is more energy efficient to bypass the cooler 84 and re-heater 88.
Depending on the type of coal and pyrolysis conditions, a typical three condensation zone absorber may be designed and configured to condense about 20% (+/−5%) heavy CDL fraction, about 25% (+/−5%) mid CDL fraction and about 20% (+/−5%) light CDL fraction in the three condensation loops as shown in
As previously noted, the CDL condensed in Zone B is led to a centrifuge 74 (
In one embodiment, the heavy CDLs are led to centrifuge 76 and the supernatant CDL portion may further be passed through a filter 96. These optional separation steps further purify the heavy CDLs, removing sludge and particulates. Similarly, medium CDLs are led to centrifuge 74 and the supernatant CDL portion may further be passed through a filter 94. These optional separation steps further purify the medium CDLs, removing sludge and particulates. Finally, light CDLs are led to centrifuge 78 and the supernatant CDL portion may further be passed through a filter 98. These optional separation steps further purify the light CDLs, removing sludge and particulates. The sludge and particulates from each of the three centrifugation and three filtration steps may be combined and used elsewhere, for example in briquetting processes.
Even though we refer to fractions as high, medium and low BP fractions, it is well understood that there is a distinction between boiling points (BP) and the actual temperature at which the condensable components will condense. Each condensable component “boils” at the temperature at which its pure vapor pressure equals atmospheric pressure. In contrast, the fractional condensation temperature (FCT) takes into account the fact that these compounds are in mixtures and each exerts only a partial vapor pressure—they are not pure. The fractional condensation curve table below (Table A) correlates the condensation zone target temperature with the approximate percent (by weight) of the CDL fraction that will condense under typical conditions, making certain assumptions about the partial pressure level of condensable components vs. the non-condensable components. Component-specific FCT estimates are discussed below in connection with
In selecting a target temperature for each zone, it should be recalled that all volatile components having a fractional condensation temperature (FCT) above the target temperature for the particular zone are likely to condense in that zone. Thus, tradeoff decisions are to be made about how many fractions are desired and how fine or broad a temperature window is needed for capturing that entire component without undue impurities. These are traded off against the cost and efficiency of additional condensation loops, and the desire and ability to further refine the fractions as collected. It should be understood that the target temperature to maintain in the condensation loops will typically be at the lower end of the ranges described herein, in order to recover all condensable components in the desired fraction.
For example, in a three loop condensation zone process as described in
It will be understood that a desire to collect additional fractions will require additional target temperatures determined according to similar logic, but with narrower temperature windows. Similarly, a desire to collect fractions that are smaller or larger than the assumed 20% heavy, 25% mid, 20% light CDLs (plus 35% additional light CDL in the mist) will require adjustments to the target temperatures as well, based on theoretical BP curves modified to fit the altered assumptions, or on empirical experience.
More specifically, it is known that each CDL component of the hydrocarbon gases has a fractional condensation temperature (FCT) that is a function of the partial pressure or vapor pressure of that compound in a mixture. Since effluent gases from the pyrolysis of coal produces a complex mixture of many compounds, each exerts only a fraction of the approximately 1 atm experienced in the system.
From the blending area, the coal char, coal fines, and particulates removed from the various CDL fraction may all be blended together to form fuel pellets or briquettes. In some embodiments, a portion of the heavy CDL fraction may optionally be used as a binder for the briquettes. Sludge 34 (with or without char fines) may also optionally be used as a binder for the briquettes.
A process and apparatus is set up substantially as schematically described in
This produces a condensable partial pressure of about 23.4% (15,000/64,000), i.e. approximately 25%. A three condensation zone absorber is arranged with heat exchange loops maintained at target temperatures of:
about 495F (257C) for the heavy CDL fraction
about 300F (149C) for the middle CDL fraction, and
about 170F (77C) for the light CDL fraction.
This configuration is designed to produce respective fractions of about 20% heavy, 25% middle and 55% light, with about 20% of the light being condensed in the exchange loop and an additional 35% recovered from an entrained mist in the air stream by an electrostatic precipitator in the gas cleaning area.
A process and apparatus substantially as schematically described in
While the invention has been described with reference to various and preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the essential scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof.
Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed herein contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims.
This application claims priority of provisional application 61/750,590 filed Jan. 9, 2013. This application is also related to published U.S. Patent Applications 2011/0011722, 2011/0011720, and 2011/0011719, each published Jan. 20, 2011; and to U.S. Patent Publication 2013/0062186, published Mar. 14, 2013, entitled PROCESS FOR TREATING COAL USING MULTIPLE DUAL ZONE STEPS.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1538490 | Randall | May 1925 | A |
1664723 | Young | Apr 1928 | A |
1669023 | Runge | May 1928 | A |
1814980 | Thomas | Jul 1931 | A |
1976908 | Wittenberg | Oct 1934 | A |
2029883 | MacCubbin et al. | Feb 1936 | A |
2040100 | Miller | May 1936 | A |
2044764 | Bywater | Jun 1936 | A |
2260072 | Wilton | Oct 1941 | A |
2366900 | Weir | Jan 1945 | A |
2528553 | Royster et al. | Nov 1950 | A |
2666796 | Gorin et al. | Jan 1954 | A |
2693409 | Stephens | Nov 1954 | A |
2748063 | Radasch | May 1956 | A |
2774716 | Kulik | Dec 1956 | A |
3010893 | Kulik | Nov 1961 | A |
3047472 | Gorin et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3375175 | Eddinger et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3463310 | Ergun et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3574065 | Eddinger et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3585732 | Itahashi | Jun 1971 | A |
3736233 | Sass et al. | May 1973 | A |
3938966 | Kindig et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4017272 | Anwer | Apr 1977 | A |
4028219 | Baldwin et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4036603 | Bernet et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4052170 | Yan | Oct 1977 | A |
4085030 | Green et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4119523 | Baldwin et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4146367 | Hsu | Mar 1979 | A |
4149939 | Solano | Apr 1979 | A |
4156595 | Scott et al. | May 1979 | A |
4213826 | Eddinger et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4216074 | Simone | Aug 1980 | A |
4234386 | Stirling | Nov 1980 | A |
4263124 | Wickstrom et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4322222 | Sass | Mar 1982 | A |
4341598 | Green | Jul 1982 | A |
4395309 | Esztergar | Jul 1983 | A |
4411766 | Garg et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4411767 | Garg | Oct 1983 | A |
4466362 | Maxwell et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4534847 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4605790 | Wojtkowski | Aug 1986 | A |
4678478 | Kelland | Jul 1987 | A |
4834650 | Docherty et al. | May 1989 | A |
5017283 | Oder | May 1991 | A |
5087269 | Cha et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5114700 | Meihack et al. | May 1992 | A |
5127586 | Oder | Jul 1992 | A |
5151159 | Wolfe et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5171406 | Shang et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176260 | Oder | Jan 1993 | A |
5232679 | Jha et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240592 | Meyer et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5326457 | Stipanovich, Jr. | Jul 1994 | A |
5372497 | Coolidge et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5373648 | Wolf | Dec 1994 | A |
5401364 | Rinker | Mar 1995 | A |
5496465 | Fraas | Mar 1996 | A |
5547549 | Fraas | Aug 1996 | A |
5601692 | Rinker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5711769 | Rinker et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5730069 | Coolidge et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5997289 | Dover | Dec 1999 | A |
8366882 | Rinker | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394240 | Rinker | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8470134 | Rinker | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20030118962 | Munzner et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040065307 | Fiveland et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070272538 | Satchell | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080006520 | Badger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080116052 | Eatough et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080201980 | Bullinger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090779981 | Drozd et al. | May 2009 | |
20090217574 | Coleman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100000224 | Cappello | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100223839 | Garcia-Perez et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110011719 | Rinker | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110258914 | Banasiak et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120066967 | Rinker | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130062186 | Rinker | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102199434 | Sep 2011 | CN |
Entry |
---|
Berkowitz N., An Introduction to Coal Technology, 1994, 2nd Edition, pp. 102-103; 164-165. |
Dadayburjor, et al., Coal Conversion Processes Liquefaction, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 851-856. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/041918, dated Feb. 24, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US11/51927, Dated Mar. 27, 2012. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US2012/039598, Dated Dec. 28, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2014/010812, dated Apr. 16, 2014. |
Kreith, F., Principles of Heat Transfer, 2nd Ed. 1965, pp. 236-238. |
Mahajan O. et al., Low-temperature air oxidation of caking coals. 1. Effect on subsequent reactivity of chars produced, FUEL, 1980, vol. 59, January, pp. 3-10. |
Oder, R., Dry magnetic Separation of Ash, Sulfur, and Mercury From a Southwestern Wyoming Coal, presented at the 18th International Low Rank Fuels Symposium, Jun. 24-26, 2003, Billings, Mt, pp. 1-6. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Application No. PCT/US2012/039598, Dated Dec. 28, 2012. |
Chinese Office Action, Application No. 201480004337.8, dated May 26, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140190074 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61750590 | Jan 2013 | US |