Patent Grant
8691130
The present invention pertains to water-dispersible fibers and fibrous articles comprising a sulfopolyester. The invention further pertains to multicomponent fibers comprising a sulfopolyester and the microdenier fibers and fibrous articles prepared therefrom. The invention also pertains to processes for water-dispersible, multicomponent, and microdenier fibers and to nonwoven fabrics prepared therefrom. The fibers and fibrous articles have applications in flushable personal care products and medical products.
Fibers, melt blown webs and other melt spun fibrous articles have been made from thermoplastic polymers, such as poly(propylene), polyamides, and polyesters. One common application of these fibers and fibrous articles are nonwoven fabrics and, in particular, in personal care products such as wipes, feminine hygiene products, baby diapers, adult incontinence briefs, hospital/surgical and other medical disposables, protective fabrics and layers, geotextiles, industrial wipes, and filter media. Unfortunately, the personal care products made from conventional thermoplastic polymers are difficult to dispose of and are usually placed in landfills. One promising alternative method of disposal is to make these products or their components “flushable”, i.e., compatible with public sewerage systems. The use of water-dispersible or water-soluble materials also improves recyclability and reclamation of personal care products. The various thermoplastic polymers now used in personal care products are not inherently water-dispersible or soluble and, hence, do not produce articles that readily disintegrate and can be disposed of in a sewerage system or recycled easily.
The desirability of flushable personal care products has resulted in a need for fibers, nonwovens, and other fibrous articles with various degrees of water-responsivity. Various approaches to addressing these needs have been described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,548,592; 6,552,162; 5,281,306; 5,292,581; 5,935,880; and 5,509,913; U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/775,312; and 09/752,017; and PCT International Publication No. WO 01/66666 A2. These approaches, however, suffer from a number of disadvantages and do not provide a fibrous article, such as a fiber or nonwoven fabric, that possesses a satisfactory balance of performance properties, such as tensile strength, absorptivity, flexibility, and fabric integrity under both wet or dry conditions.
For example, typical nonwoven technology is based on the multidirectional deposition of fibers that are treated with a resin binding adhesive to form a web having strong integrity and other desirable properties. The resulting assemblies, however, generally have poor water-responsivity and are not suitable for flushable applications. The presence of binder also may result in undesirable properties in the final product, such as reduced sheet wettability, increased stiffness, stickiness, and higher production costs. It is also difficult to produce a binder that will exhibit adequate wet strength during use and yet disperse quickly upon disposal. Thus, nonwoven assemblies using these binders may either disintegrate slowly under ambient conditions or have less than adequate wet strength properties in the presence of body fluids. To address this problem, pH and ion-sensitive water-dispersible binders, such as lattices containing acrylic or methacrylic acid with or without added salts, are known and described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,548,592 B1. Ion concentrations and pH levels in public sewerage and residential septic systems, however, can vary widely among geographical locations and may not be sufficient for the binder to become soluble and disperse. In this case, the fibrous articles will not disintegrate after disposal and can clog drains or sewer laterals.
Multicomponent fibers containing a water-dispersible component and a thermoplastic water non-dispersible component have been described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,916,678; 5,405,698; 4,966,808; 5,525,282; 5,366,804; 5,486,418. For example, these multicomponent fibers may be a bicomponent fiber having a shaped or engineered transverse cross section such as, for example, an islands-in-the-sea, sheath core, side-by-side, or segmented pie configuration. The multicomponent fiber can be subjected to water or a dilute alkaline solution where the water-dispersible component is dissolved away to leave the water non-dispersible component behind as separate, independent fibers of extremely small fineness. Polymers which have good water dispersibility, however, often impart tackiness to the resulting multicomponent fibers, which causes the fiber to stick together, block, or fuse during winding or storage after several days, especially under hot, humid conditions. To prevent fusing, often a fatty acid or oil-based finish is applied to the surface of the fiber. In addition, large proportions of pigments or fillers are sometimes added to water dispersible polymers to prevent fusing of the fibers as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,171,685. Such oil finishes, pigments, and fillers require additional processing steps and can impart undesirable properties to the final fiber. Many water-dispersible polymers also require alkaline solutions for their removal which can cause degradation of the other polymer components of the fiber such as, for example, reduction of inherent viscosity, tenacity, and melt strength. Further, some water-dispersible polymers can not withstand exposure to water during hydroentanglement and, thus, are not suitable for the manufacture of nonwoven webs and fabrics.
Alternatively, the water-dispersible component may serve as a bonding agent for the thermoplastic fibers in nonwoven webs. Upon exposure to water, the fiber to fiber bonds come apart such that the nonwoven web loses its integrity and breaks down into individual fibers. The thermoplastic fiber components of these nonwoven webs, however, are not water-dispersible and remain present in the aqueous medium and, thus, must eventually be removed from municipal wastewater treatment plants. Hydroentanglement may be used to produce disintegratable nonwoven fabrics without or with very low levels (<5 wt %) of added binder to hold the fibers together. Although these fabrics may disintegrate upon disposal, they often utilize fibers that are not water soluble or water-dispersible and may result in entanglement and plugging within sewer systems. Any added water-dispersible binders also must be minimally affected by hydroentangling and not form gelatinous buildup or cross-link, and thereby contribute to fabric handling or sewer related problems.
A few water-soluble or water-dispersible polymers are available, but are generally not applicable to melt blown fiber forming operations or melt spinning in general. Polymers, such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and polyacrylic acid are not melt processable as a result of thermal decomposition that occurs at temperatures below the point where a suitable melt viscosity is attained. High molecular weight polyethylene oxide may have suitable thermal stability, but would provide a high viscosity solution at the polymer interface resulting in a slow rate of disintegration. Water-dispersible sulfopolyesters have been described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,171,685; 5,543,488; 5,853,701; 4,304,901; 6,211,309; 5,570,605; 6,428,900; and 3,779,993. Typical sulfopolyesters, however, are low molecular weight thermoplastics that are brittle and lack the flexibility to withstand a winding operation to yield a roll of material that does not fracture or crumble. Sulfopolyesters also can exhibit blocking or fusing during processing into film or fibers, which may require the use of oil finishes or large amounts of pigments or fillers to avoid. Low molecular weight polyethylene oxide (more commonly known as polyethylene glycol) is a weak/brittle polymer that also does not have the required physical properties for fiber applications. Forming fibers from known water-soluble polymers via solution techniques is an alternative, but the added complexity of removing solvent, especially water, increases manufacturing costs.
Accordingly, there is a need for a water-dispersible fiber and fibrous articles prepared therefrom that exhibit adequate tensile strength, absorptivity, flexibility, and fabric integrity in the presence of moisture, especially upon exposure to human bodily fluids. In addition, a fibrous article is needed that does not require a binder and completely disperses or dissolves in residential or municipal sewerage systems. Potential uses include, but are not limited to, melt blown webs, spunbond fabrics, hydroentangled fabrics, dry-laid non-wovens, bicomponent fiber components, adhesive promoting layers, binders for cellulosics, flushable nonwovens and films, dissolvable binder fibers, protective layers, and carriers for active ingredients to be released or dissolved in water. There is also a need for multicomponent fiber having a water-dispersible component that does not exhibit excessive blocking or fusing of filaments during spinning operations, is easily removed by hot water at neutral or slightly acidic pH, and is suitable for hydroentangling processes to manufacture nonwoven fabrics. Other extrudable and melt spun fibrous materials are also possible.
We have unexpectedly discovered that flexible, water-dispersible fibers may be prepared from sulfopolyesters. Thus the present invention provides a water-dispersible fiber comprising:
(i) residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids;
(ii) about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n-OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and
(iv) 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
wherein the fiber contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber.
The fibers of the present invention may be unicomponent fibers that rapidly disperse or dissolve in water and may be produced by melt-blowing or melt-spinning. The fibers may be prepared from a single sulfopolyester or a blend of the sulfopolyester with a water-dispersible or water non-dispersible polymer. Thus, the fiber of the present invention, optionally, may include a water-dispersible polymer blended with the sulfopolyester. In addition, the fiber may optionally include a water non-dispersible polymer blended with the sulfopolyester, provided that the blend is an immiscible blend. Our invention also includes fibrous articles comprising our water-dispersible fibers. Thus, the fibers of our invention may be used to prepare various fibrous articles, such as yarns, melt-blown webs, spunbonded webs, and nonwoven fabrics that are, in turn, water-dispersible or flushable. Staple fibers of our invention can also be blended with natural or synthetic fibers in paper, nonwoven webs, and textile yarns.
Another aspect of the present invention is a water-dispersible fiber comprising:
(i) about 50 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid, based on the total acid residues;
(ii) about 4 to about 30 mole %, based on the total acid residues, of a residue of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n-OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500;
(iv) 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
wherein the fiber contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber.
The water-dispersible, fibrous articles of the present invention include personal care articles such as, for example, wipes, gauze, tissue, diapers, training pants, sanitary napkins, bandages, wound care, and surgical dressings. In addition to being water-dispersible, the fibrous articles of our invention are flushable, that is, compatible with and suitable for disposal in residential and municipal sewerage systems.
The present invention also provides a multicomponent fiber comprising a water-dispersible sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers. The fiber has an engineered geometry such that the water non-dispersible polymers are present as segments substantially isolated from each other by the intervening sulfopolyester, which acts as a binder or encapsulating matrix for the water non-dispersible segments. Thus, another aspect of our invention is a multicomponent fiber having a shaped cross section, comprising:
(i) residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids;
(ii) about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and
(iv) 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof; and
wherein the fiber contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber.
The sulfopolyester has a glass transition temperature of at least 57° C. which greatly reduces blocking and fusion of the fiber during winding and long term storage. The sulfopolyester may be removed by contacting the multicomponent fiber with water to leave behind the water non-dispersible segments as microdenier fibers. Our invention, therefore, also provides a process for microdenier fibers comprising:
(i) about 50 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid, based on the total acid residues;
(ii) about 4 to about 30 mole %, based on the total acid residues, of a residue of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and
(iv) 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
wherein the fibers have a plurality of segments comprising the water non-dispersible polymers wherein the segments are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the segments and the fibers contain less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fibers; and
The water non-dispersible polymers may be biodistintegratable as determined by DIN Standard 54900 and/or biodegradable as determined by ASTM Standard Method, D6340-98. The multicomponent fiber also may be used to prepare a fibrous article such as a yarn, fabric, melt-blown web, spun-bonded web, or non-woven fabric and which may comprise one or more layers of fibers. The fibrous article having multicomponent fibers, in turn, may be contacted with water to produce fibrous articles containing microdenier fibers.
Thus, another aspect of the invention is a process for a microdenier fiber web, comprising:
(i) about 50 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid, based on the total acid residues;
(ii) about 4 to about 30 mole %, based on the total acid residues, of a residue of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and
(iv) 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof.
wherein the multicomponent fibers have a plurality of segments comprising the water non-dispersible polymers and the segments are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the segments and the fibers contain less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of said fibers;
Our invention also provides a process making a water-dispersible, nonwoven fabric comprising:
(i) a sulfopolyester having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least 25° C., the sulfopolyester comprising:
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500;
(ii) optionally, a water-dispersible polymer blended with the sulfopolyester; and
(iii) optionally, a water non-dispersible polymer blended with the sulfopolyester to form a blend with the proviso that the blend is an immiscible blend;
wherein the polymer composition contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the polymer composition;
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a multicomponent fiber, having a shaped cross section, comprising:
wherein the fiber has an as-spun denier of less than about 6 denier per filament;
wherein the water dispersible sulfopolyesters exhibits a melt viscosity of less than about 12,000 poise measured at 240° C. at a strain rate of 1 rad/sec, and wherein the sulfopolyester comprises less than about 25 mole % of residues of at least one sulfomonomer, based on the total moles of diacid or diol residues.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a multicomponent extrudate having a shaped cross section, comprising:
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a process for making a multicomponent fiber having a shaped cross section comprising spinning at least one water dispersible sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers immiscible with the sulfopolyester, wherein the multicomponent fiber has a plurality of domains comprising the water non-dispersible polymers and the domains are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the domains; wherein the multicomponent fiber has an as-spun denier of less than about 6 denier per filament; wherein the water dispersible sulfopolyester exhibits a melt viscosity of less than about 12,000 poise measured at 240° C. at a strain rate of 1 rad/sec, and wherein the sulfopolyester comprises less than about 25 mole % of residues of at least one sulfomonomer, based on the total moles of diacid or diol residues.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for making a multicomponent fiber having a shaped cross section comprising extruding at least one water dispersible sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers immiscible with the sulfopolyester to produce a multicomponent extrudate, wherein the multicomponent extrudate has a plurality of domains comprising said water non-dispersible polymers and said domains are substantially isolated from each other by said sulfopolyester intervening between said domains; and melt drawing the multicomponent extrudate at a speed of at least about 2000 m/min to produce the multicomponent fiber.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a process for producing microdenier fibers comprising:
In another aspect, the present invention provides a process for producing microdenier fibers comprising:
In yet another aspect of this invention, a process is provided for making a microdenier fiber web comprising:
In yet another aspect of this invention, a process for making a microdenier fiber web is provided comprising:
Our invention thus offers a novel and inexpensive process for a water-dispersible nonwoven fabric by melt-spinning a water-dispersible sulfopolyester and forming a nonwoven web. The nonwoven fabric may be in the form of a flat fabric or a 3-dimensional shape and may be incorporated into a variety of fibrous articles such as the personal care articles noted hereinabove or used for the manufacture of water-dispersible and/or flushable protective outerware such as, for example, surgical gowns and protective clothing for chemical and biohazard cleanup and laboratory work.
The present invention provides water-dispersible fibers and fibrous articles that show tensile strength, absorptivity, flexibility, and fabric integrity in the presence of moisture, especially upon exposure to human bodily fluids. The fibers and fibrous articles of our invention do not require the presence of oil, wax, or fatty acid finishes or the use of large amounts (typically 10 wt % or greater) of pigments or fillers to prevent blocking or fusing of the fibers during processing. In addition, the fibrous articles prepared from our novel fibers do not require a binder and readily disperse or dissolve in home or public sewerage systems.
In a general embodiment, our invention provides a water-dispersible fiber comprising a sulfopolyester having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least 25° C., wherein the sulfopolyester comprises:
The fibers of our invention may be unicomponent fibers, bicomponent or multicomponent fibers. For example, the fibers of the present invention may be prepared by melt spinning a single sulfopolyester or sulfopolyester blend and include staple, monofilament, and multifilament fibers with a shaped cross-section. In addition, our invention provides multicomponent fibers, such as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,916,678, which may be prepared by extruding the sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers, which are immiscible with the sulfopolyester, separately through a spinneret having a shaped or engineered transverse geometry such as, for example, an “islands-in-the-sea”, sheath-core, side-by-side, or segmented pie configuration. The sulfopolyester may be later removed by dissolving the interfacial layers or pie segments and leaving the smaller filaments or microdenier fibers of the water non-dispersible polymer(s). These fibers of the water non-dispersible polymer have fiber size much smaller than the multi-component fiber before removing the sulfopolyester. For example, the sulfopolyester and water non-dispersible polymers may be fed to a polymer distribution system where the polymers are introduced into a segmented spinneret plate. The polymers follow separate paths to the fiber spinneret and are combined at the spinneret hole which comprises either two concentric circular holes thus providing a sheath-core type fiber, or a circular spinneret hole divided along a diameter into multiple parts to provide a fiber having a side-by-side type. Alternatively, the immiscible water dispersible sulfopolyester and water non-dispersible polymers may be introduced separately into a spinneret having a plurality of radial channels to produce a multicomponent fiber having a segmented pie cross section. Typically, the sulfopolyester will form the “sheath” component of a sheath core configuration. In fiber cross sections having a plurality of segments, the water non-dispersible segments, typically, are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester. Alternatively, multicomponent fibers may be formed by melting the sulfopolyester and water non-dispersible polymers in separate extruders and directing the polymer flows into one spinneret with a plurality of distribution flow paths in form of small thin tubes or segments to provide a fiber having an islands-in-the-sea shaped cross section. An example of such a spinneret is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,804. In the present invention, typically, the sulfopolyester will form the “sea” component and the water non-dispersible polymer will form the “islands” component.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as molecular weight, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Further, the ranges stated in this disclosure and the claims are intended to include the entire range specifically and not just the endpoint(s). For example, a range stated to be 0 to 10 is intended to disclose all whole numbers between 0 and 10 such as, for example 1, 2, 3, 4, etc., all fractional numbers between 0 and 10, for example 1.5, 2.3, 4.57, 6.1113, etc., and the endpoints 0 and 10. Also, a range associated with chemical substituent groups such as, for example, “C1 to C5 hydrocarbons”, is intended to specifically include and disclose C1 and C5 hydrocarbons as well as C2, C3, and C4 hydrocarbons.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contain certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.
The unicomponent fibers and fibrous articles of the present invention are water-dispersible and, typically, completely disperse at room temperature. Higher water temperatures can be used to accelerate their dispersibility or rate of removal from the nonwoven or multicomponent fiber. The term “water-dispersible”, as used herein with respect to unicomponent fibers and fibrous articles prepared from unicomponent fibers, is intended to be synonymous with the terms “water-dissipatable”, “water-disintegratable”, “water-dissolvable”, “water-dispellable”, “water soluble”, water-removable”, “hydrosoluble”, and “hydrodispersible” and is intended to mean that the fiber or fibrous article is therein or therethrough dispersed or dissolved by the action of water. The terms “dispersed”, “dispersible”, “dissipate”, or “dissipatable” mean that, using a sufficient amount of deionized water (e.g., 100:1 water:fiber by weight) to form a loose suspension or slurry of the fibers or fibrous article, at a temperature of about 60° C., and within a time period of up to 5 days, the fiber or fibrous article dissolves, disintegrates, or separates into a plurality of incoherent pieces or particles distributed more or less throughout the medium such that no recognizable filaments are recoverable from the medium upon removal of the water, for example, by filtration or evaporation. Thus, “water-dispersible”, as used herein, is not intended to include the simple disintegration of an assembly of entangled or bound, but otherwise water insoluble or nondispersible, fibers wherein the fiber assembly simply breaks apart in water to produce a slurry of fibers in water which could be recovered by removal of the water. In the context of this invention, all of these terms refer to the activity of water or a mixture of water and a water-miscible cosolvent on the sulfopolyesters described herein. Examples of such water-miscible cosolvents includes alcohols, ketones, glycol ethers, esters and the like. It is intended for this terminology to include conditions where the sulfopolyester is dissolved to form a true solution as well as those where the sulfopolyester is dispersed within the aqueous medium. Often, due to the statistical nature of sulfopolyester compositions, it is possible to have a soluble fraction and a dispersed fraction when a single sulfopolyester sample is placed in an aqueous medium.
Similarly, the term “water-dispersible”, as used herein in reference to the sulfopolyester as one component of a multicomponent fiber or fibrous article, also is intended to be synonymous with the terms “water-dissipatable”, “water-disintegratable”, “water-dissolvable”, “water-dispellable”, “water soluble”, “water-removable”, “hydrosoluble”, and “hydrodispersible” and is intended to mean that the sulfopolyester component is sufficiently removed from the multicomponent fiber and is dispersed or dissolved by the action of water to enable the release and separation of the water non-dispersible fibers contained therein. The terms “dispersed”, “dispersible”, “dissipate”, or “dissipatable” mean that, using a sufficient amount of deionized water (e.g., 100:1 water:fiber by weight) to form a loose suspension or slurry of the fibers or fibrous article, at a temperature of about 60° C., and within a time period of up to 5 days, sulfopolyester component dissolves, disintegrates, or separates from the multicomponent fiber, leaving behind a plurality of microdenier fibers from the water non-dispersible segments.
The term “segment” or “domain” or “zone” when used to describe the shaped cross section of a multicomponent fiber refers to the area within the cross section comprising the water non-dispersible polymers where these domains or segments are substantially isolated from each other by the water-dispersible sulfopolyester intervening between the segments or domains. The term “substantially isolated”, as used herein, is intended to mean that the segments or domains are set apart from each other to permit the segments domains to form individual fibers upon removal of the sulfopolyester. Segments or domains or zones can be of similar size and shape or varying size and shape. Again, segments or domains or zones can be arranged in any configuration. These segments or domains or zones are “substantially continuous” along the length of the multicomponent extrudate or fiber. The term “substantially continuous” means continuous along at least 10 cm length of the multicomponent fiber.
As stated within this disclosure, the shaped cross section of a multicomponent fiber can, for example, be in the form of a sheath core, islands-in-the sea, segmented pie, hollow segmented pie; off-centered segmented pie, etc.
The water-dispersible fiber of the present invention is prepared from polyesters or, more specifically sulfopolyesters, comprising dicarboxylic acid monomer residues, sulfomonomer residues, diol monomer residues, and repeating units. The sulfomonomer may be a dicarboxylic acid, a diol, or hydroxycarboxylic acid. Thus, the term “monomer residue”, as used herein, means a residue of a dicarboxylic acid, a diol, or a hydroxycarboxylic acid. A “repeating unit”, as used herein, means an organic structure having 2 monomer residues bonded through a carbonyloxy group. The sulfopolyesters of the present invention contain substantially equal molar proportions of acid residues (100 mole %) and diol residues (100 mole %) which react in substantially equal proportions such that the total moles of repeating units is equal to 100 mole %. The mole percentages provided in the present disclosure, therefore, may be based on the total moles of acid residues, the total moles of diol residues, or the total moles of repeating units. For example, a sulfopolyester containing 30 mole % of a sulfomonomer, which may be a dicarboxylic acid, a diol, or hydroxycarboxylic acid, based on the total repeating units, means that the sulfopolyester contains 30 mole % sulfomonomer out of a total of 100 mole % repeating units. Thus, there are 30 moles of sulfomonomer residues among every 100 moles of repeating units. Similarly, a sulfopolyester containing 30 mole % of a dicarboxylic acid sulfomonomer, based on the total acid residues, means the sulfopolyester contains 30 mole % sulfomonomer out of a total of 100 mole % acid residues. Thus, in this latter case, there are 30 moles of sulfomonomer residues among every 100 moles of acid residues.
The sulfopolyesters described herein have an inherent viscosity, abbreviated hereinafter as “Ih.V.”, of at least about 0.1 dL/g, preferably about 0.2 to 0.3 dL/g, and most preferably greater than about 0.3 dL/g, measured in a 60/40 parts by weight solution of phenol/tetrachloroethane solvent at 25° C. and at a concentration of about 0.5 g of sulfopolyester in 100 mL of solvent. The term “polyester”, as used herein, encompasses both “homopolyesters” and “copolyesters” and means a synthetic polymer prepared by the polycondensation of difunctional carboxylic acids with difunctional hydroxyl compound. As used herein, the term “sulfopolyester” means any polyester comprising a sulfomonomer. Typically the difunctional carboxylic acid is a dicarboxylic acid and the difunctional hydroxyl compound is a dihydric alcohol such as, for example glycols and diols. Alternatively, the difunctional carboxylic acid may be a hydroxy carboxylic acid such as, for example, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and the difunctional hydroxyl compound may be a aromatic nucleus bearing 2 hydroxy substituents such as, for example, hydroquinone. The term “residue”, as used herein, means any organic structure incorporated into the polymer through a polycondensation reaction involving the corresponding monomer. Thus, the dicarboxylic acid residue may be derived from a dicarboxylic acid monomer or its associated acid halides, esters, salts, anhydrides, or mixtures thereof. As used herein, therefore, the term dicarboxylic acid is intended to include dicarboxylic acids and any derivative of a dicarboxylic acid, including its associated acid halides, esters, half-esters, salts, half-salts, anhydrides, mixed anhydrides, or mixtures thereof, useful in a polycondensation process with a diol to make a high molecular weight polyester.
The sulfopolyester of the present invention includes one or more dicarboxylic acid residues. Depending on the type and concentration of the sulfomonomer, the dicarboxylic acid residue may comprise from about 60 to about 100 mole % of the acid residues. Other examples of concentration ranges of dicarboxylic acid residues are from about 60 mole % to about 95 mole %, and about 70 mole % to about 95 mole %. Examples of dicarboxylic acids that may be used include aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, alicyclic dicarboxylic acids, aromatic dicarboxylic acids, or mixtures of two or more of these acids. Thus, suitable dicarboxylic acids include, but are not limited to, succinic; glutaric; adipic; azelaic; sebacic; fumaric; maleic; itaconic; 1,3-cyclohexanedicarboxylic; 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic; diglycolic; 2,5-norbornanedicarboxylic; phthalic; terephthalic; 1,4-naphthalenedicarboxylic; 2,5-naphthalenedicarboxylic; diphenic; 4,4′-oxydibenzoic; 4,4′-sulfonyldibenzoic; and isophthalic. The preferred dicarboxylic acid residues are isophthalic, terephthalic, and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acids, or if diesters are used, dimethyl terephthalate, dimethyl isophthalate, and dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate with the residues of isophthalic and terephthalic acid being especially preferred. Although the dicarboxylic acid methyl ester is the most preferred embodiment, it is also acceptable to include higher order alkyl esters, such as ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, and so forth. In addition, aromatic esters, particularly phenyl, also may be employed.
The sulfopolyester includes about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof. Additional examples of concentration ranges for the sulfomonomer residues are about 4 to about 35 mole %, about 8 to about 30 mole %, and about 8 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units. The sulfomonomer may be a dicarboxylic acid or ester thereof containing a sulfonate group, a diol containing a sulfonate group, or a hydroxy acid containing a sulfonate group. The term “sulfonate” refers to a salt of a sulfonic acid having the structure “—SO3M” wherein M is the cation of the sulfonate salt. The cation of the sulfonate salt may be a metal ion such as Li+, Na+, K+, Mg++, Ca++, Ni++, Fe++, and the like. Alternatively, the cation of the sulfonate salt may be non-metallic such as a nitrogenous base as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,304,901. Nitrogen-based cations are derived from nitrogen-containing bases, which may be aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, or aromatic compounds. Examples of such nitrogen containing bases include ammonia, dimethylethanolamine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, pyridine, morpholine, and piperidine. Because monomers containing the nitrogen-based sulfonate salts typically are not thermally stable at conditions required to make the polymers in the melt, the method of this invention for preparing sulfopolyesters containing nitrogen-based sulfonate salt groups is to disperse, dissipate, or dissolve the polymer containing the required amount of sulfonate group in the form of its alkali metal salt in water and then exchange the alkali metal cation for a nitrogen-based cation.
When a monovalent alkali metal ion is used as the cation of the sulfonate salt, the resulting sulfopolyester is completely dispersible in water with the rate of dispersion dependent on the content of sulfomonomer in the polymer, temperature of the water, surface area/thickness of the sulfopolyester, and so forth. When a divalent metal ion is used, the resulting sulfopolyesters are not readily dispersed by cold water but are more easily dispersed by hot water. Utilization of more than one counterion within a single polymer composition is possible and may offer a means to tailor or fine-tune the water-responsivity of the resulting article of manufacture. Examples of sulfomonomers residues include monomer residues where the sulfonate salt group is attached to an aromatic acid nucleus, such as, for example, benzene; naphthalene; diphenyl; oxydiphenyl; sulfonyldiphenyl; and methylenediphenyl or cycloaliphatic rings, such as, for example, cyclohexyl; cyclopentyl; cyclobutyl; cycloheptyl; and cyclooctyl. Other examples of sulfomonomer residues which may be used in the present invention are the metal sulfonate salt of sulfophthalic acid, sulfoterephthalic acid, sulfoisophthalic acid, or combinations thereof. Other examples of sulfomonomers which may be used are 5-sodiosulfoisophthalic acid and esters thereof. If the sulfomonomer residue is from 5-sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, typical sulfomonomer concentration ranges are about 4 to about 35 mole %, about 8 to about 30 mole %, and about 8 to 25 mole %, based on the total moles of acid residues.
The sulfomonomers used in the preparation of the sulfopolyesters are known compounds and may be prepared using methods well known in the art. For example, sulfomonomers in which the sulfonate group is attached to an aromatic ring may be prepared by sulfonating the aromatic compound with oleum to obtain the corresponding sulfonic acid and followed by reaction with a metal oxide or base, for example, sodium acetate, to prepare the sulfonate salt. Procedures for preparation of various sulfomonomers are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,779,993; 3,018,272; and 3,528,947.
It is also possible to prepare the polyester using, for example, a sodium sulfonate salt, and ion-exchange methods to replace the sodium with a different ion, such as zinc, when the polymer is in the dispersed form. This type of ion exchange procedure is generally superior to preparing the polymer with divalent salts insofar as the sodium salts are usually more soluble in the polymer reactant melt-phase.
The sulfopolyester includes one or more diol residues which may include aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, and aralkyl glycols. The cycloaliphatic diols, for example, 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, may be present as their pure cis or trans isomers or as a mixture of cis and trans isomers. As used herein, the term “diol” is synonymous with the term “glycol” and means any dihydric alcohol. Examples of diols include, but are not limited to, ethylene glycol; diethylene glycol; triethylene glycol; polyethylene glycols; 1,3-propanediol; 2,4-dimethyl-2-ethylhexane-1,3-diol; 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol; 2-ethyl-2-butyl-1,3-propanediol; 2-ethyl-2-isobutyl-1,3-propanediol; 1,3-butanediol; 1,4-butanediol; 1,5-pentanediol; 1,6-hexanediol; 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexanediol; thiodiethanol; 1,2-cyclohexanedimethanol; 1,3-cyclohexanedimethanol; 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol; 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol; p-xylylenediol, or combinations of one or more of these glycols.
The diol residues may include from about 25 mole % to about 100 mole %, based on the total diol residues, of residue of a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500. Non-limiting examples of lower molecular weight polyethylene glycols, e.g., wherein n is from 2 to 6, are diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, and tetraethylene glycol. Of these lower molecular weight glycols, diethylene and triethylene glycol are most preferred. Higher molecular weight polyethylene glycols (abbreviated herein as “PEG”), wherein n is from 7 to about 500, include the commercially available products known under the designation CARBOWAX®, a product of Dow Chemical Company (formerly Union Carbide). Typically, PEGs are used in combination with other diols such as, for example, diethylene glycol or ethylene glycol. Based on the values of n, which range from greater than 6 to 500, the molecular weight may range from greater than 300 to about 22,000 g/mol. The molecular weight and the mole % are inversely proportional to each other; specifically, as the molecular weight is increased, the mole % will be decreased in order to achieve a designated degree of hydrophilicity. For example, it is illustrative of this concept to consider that a PEG having a molecular weight of 1000 may constitute up to 10 mole % of the total diol, while a PEG having a molecular weight of 10,000 would typically be incorporated at a level of less than 1 mole % of the total diol.
Certain dimer, trimer, and tetramer diols may be formed in situ due to side reactions that may be controlled by varying the process conditions. For example, varying amounts of diethylene, triethylene, and tetraethylene glycols may be formed from ethylene glycol from an acid-catalyzed dehydration reaction which occurs readily when the polycondensation reaction is carried out under acidic conditions. The presence of buffer solutions, well-known to those skilled in the art, may be added to the reaction mixture to retard these side reactions. Additional compositional latitude is possible, however, if the buffer is omitted and the dimerization, trimerization, and tetramerization reactions are allowed to proceed.
The sulfopolyester of the present invention may include from 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof. Non-limiting examples of branching monomers are 1,1,1-trimethylol propane, 1,1,1-trimethylolethane, glycerin, pentaerythritol, erythritol, threitol, dipentaerythritol, sorbitol, trimellitic anhydride, pyromellitic dianhydride, dimethylol propionic acid, or combinations thereof. Further examples of branching monomer concentration ranges are from 0 to about 20 mole % and from 0 to about 10 mole %. The presence of a branching monomer may result in a number of possible benefits to the sulfopolyester of the present invention, including but not limited to, the ability to tailor rheological, solubility, and tensile properties. For example, at a constant molecular weight, a branched sulfopolyester, compared to a linear analog, will also have a greater concentration of end groups that may facilitate post-polymerization crosslinking reactions. At high concentrations of branching agent, however, the sulfopolyester may be prone to gelation.
The sulfopolyester used for the fiber of the present invention has a glass transition temperature, abbreviated herein as “Tg”, of at least 25° C. as measured on the dry polymer using standard techniques, such as differential scanning calorimetry (“DSC”), well known to persons skilled in the art. The Tg measurements of the sulfopolyesters of the present invention are conducted using a “dry polymer”, that is, a polymer sample in which adventitious or absorbed water is driven off by heating to polymer to a temperature of about 200° C. and allowing the sample to return to room temperature. Typically, the sulfopolyester is dried in the DSC apparatus by conducting a first thermal scan in which the sample is heated to a temperature above the water vaporization temperature, holding the sample at that temperature until the vaporization of the water absorbed in the polymer is complete (as indicated by an a large, broad endotherm), cooling the sample to room temperature, and then conducting a second thermal scan to obtain the Tg measurement. Further examples of glass transition temperatures exhibited by the sulfopolyester are at least 30° C., at least 35° C., at least 40° C., at least 50° C., at least 60° C., at least 65° C., at least 80° C., and at least 90° C. Although other Tg's are possible, typical glass transition temperatures of the dry sulfopolyesters our invention are about 30° C., about 48° C., about 55° C., about 65° C., about 70° C., about 75° C., about 85° C., and about 90° C.
Our novel fibers may consist essentially of or, consist of, the sulfopolyesters described hereinabove. In another embodiment, however, the sulfopolyesters of this invention may be a single polyester or may be blended with one or more supplemental polymers to modify the properties of the resulting fiber. The supplemental polymer may or may not be water-dispersible depending on the application and may be miscible or immiscible with the sulfopolyester. If the supplemental polymer is water non-dispersible, it is preferred that the blend with the sulfopolyester is immiscible. The term “miscible”, as used herein, is intended to mean that the blend has a single, homogeneous amorphous phase as indicated by a single composition-dependent Tg. For example, a first polymer that is miscible with second polymer may be used to “plasticize” the second polymer as illustrated, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,211,309. By contrast, the term “immiscible”, as used herein, denotes a blend that shows at least 2, randomly mixed, phases and exhibits more than one Tg. Some polymers may be immiscible and yet compatible with the sulfopolyester. A further general description of miscible and immiscible polymer blends and the various analytical techniques for their characterization may be found in Polymer Blends Volumes 1 and 2, Edited by D. R. Paul and C. B. Bucknall, 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Non-limiting examples of water-dispersible polymers that may be blended with the sulfopolyester are polymethacrylic acid, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, polyvinyl methyl ether, polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene oxide, hydroxy propyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, isopropyl cellulose, methyl ether starch, polyacrylamides, poly(N-vinyl caprolactam), polyethyl oxazoline, poly(2-isopropyl-2-oxazoline), polyvinyl methyl oxazolidone, water-dispersible sulfopolyesters, polyvinyl methyl oxazolidimone, poly(2,4-dimethyl-6-triazinylethylene), and ethylene oxide-propylene oxide copolymers. Examples of polymers which are water non-dispersible that may be blended with the sulfopolyester include, but are not limited to, polyolefins, such as homo- and copolymers of polyethylene and polypropylene; poly(ethylene terephthalate); poly(butylene terephthalate); and polyamides, such as nylon-6; polylactides; caprolactone; Eastar Bio® (poly(tetramethylene adipate-co-terephthalate), a product of Eastman Chemical Company); polycarbonate; polyurethane; and polyvinyl chloride.
According to our invention, blends of more than one sulfopolyester may be used to tailor the end-use properties of the resulting fiber or fibrous article, for example, a nonwoven fabric or web. The blends of one or more sulfopolyesters will have Tg's of at least 25° C. for the water-dispersible, unicomponent fibers and at least 57° C. for the multicomponent fibers. Thus, blending may also be exploited to alter the processing characteristics of a sulfopolyester to facilitate the fabrication of a nonwoven. In another example, an immiscible blend of polypropylene and sulfopolyester may provide a conventional nonwoven web that will break apart and completely disperse in water as true solubility is not needed. In this latter example, the desired performance is related to maintaining the physical properties of the polypropylene while the sulfopolyester is only a spectator during the actual use of the product or, alternatively, the sulfopolyester is fugitive and is removed before the final form of the product is utilized.
The sulfopolyester and supplemental polymer may be blended in batch, semicontinuous, or continuous processes. Small scale batches may be readily prepared in any high-intensity mixing devices well-known to those skilled in the art, such as Banbury mixers, prior to melt-spinning fibers. The components may also be blended in solution in an appropriate solvent. The melt blending method includes blending the sulfopolyester and supplemental polymer at a temperature sufficient to melt the polymers. The blend may be cooled and pelletized for further use or the melt blend can be melt spun directly from this molten blend into fiber form. The term “melt” as used herein includes, but is not limited to, merely softening the polyester. For melt mixing methods generally known in the polymers art, see Mixing and Compounding of Polymers (I. Manas-Zloczower & Z. Tadmor editors, Carl Hanser Verlag Publisher, 1994, New York, N.Y.).
Our invention also provides a water-dispersible fiber comprising a sulfopolyester having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least 25° C., wherein the sulfopolyester comprises:
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; (iv) 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof. As described hereinabove, the fiber may optionally include a first water-dispersible polymer blended with the sulfopolyester; and, optionally, a water non-dispersible polymer blended with the sulfopolyester such that the blend is an immiscible blend. Our fiber contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber. The first water-dispersible polymer is as described hereinabove. The sulfopolyester should have a glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least 25° C., but may have, for example, a Tg of about 35° C., about 48° C., about 55° C., about 65° C., about 70° C., about 75° C., about 85° C., and about 90° C. The sulfopolyester may contain other concentrations of isophthalic acid residues, for example, about 60 to about 95 mole %, and about 75 to about 95 mole %. Further examples of isophthalic acid residue concentrations ranges are about 70 to about 85 mole %, about 85 to about 95 mole % and about 90 to about 95 mole %. The sulfopolyester also may comprise about 25 to about 95 mole % of the residues of diethylene glycol. Further examples of diethylene glycol residue concentration ranges include about 50 to about 95 mole %, about 70 to about 95 mole %, and about 75 to about 95 mole %. The sulfopolyester also may include the residues of ethylene glycol and/or 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, abbreviated herein as “CHDM”. Typical concentration ranges of CHDM residues are about 10 to about 75 mole %, about 25 to about 65 mole %, and about 40 to about 60 mole %. Typical concentration ranges of ethylene glycol residues are about 10 to about 75 mole %, about 25 to about 65 mole %, and about 40 to about 60 mole %. In another embodiment, the sulfopolyester comprises is about 75 to about 96 mole % of the residues of isophthalic acid and about 25 to about 95 mole % of the residues of diethylene glycol.
The sulfopolyesters of the instant invention are readily prepared from the appropriate dicarboxylic acids, esters, anhydrides, or salts, sulfomonomer, and the appropriate diol or diol mixtures using typical polycondensation reaction conditions. They may be made by continuous, semi-continuous, and batch modes of operation and may utilize a variety of reactor types. Examples of suitable reactor types include, but are not limited to, stirred tank, continuous stirred tank, slurry, tubular, wiped-film, falling film, or extrusion reactors. The term “continuous” as used herein means a process wherein reactants are introduced and products withdrawn simultaneously in an uninterrupted manner. By “continuous” it is meant that the process is substantially or completely continuous in operation and is to be contrasted with a “batch” process. “Continuous” is not meant in any way to prohibit normal interruptions in the continuity of the process due to, for example, start-up, reactor maintenance, or scheduled shut down periods. The term “batch” process as used herein means a process wherein all the reactants are added to the reactor and then processed according to a predetermined course of reaction during which no material is fed or removed into the reactor. The term “semicontinuous” means a process where some of the reactants are charged at the beginning of the process and the remaining reactants are fed continuously as the reaction progresses. Alternatively, a semicontinuous process may also include a process similar to a batch process in which all the reactants are added at the beginning of the process except that one or more of the products are removed continuously as the reaction progresses. The process is operated advantageously as a continuous process for economic reasons and to produce superior coloration of the polymer as the sulfopolyester may deteriorate in appearance if allowed to reside in a reactor at an elevated temperature for too long a duration.
The sulfopolyesters of the present invention are prepared by procedures known to persons skilled in the art. The sulfomonomer is most often added directly to the reaction mixture from which the polymer is made, although other processes are known and may also be employed, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,018,272, 3,075,952, and 3,033,822. The reaction of the sulfomonomer, diol component and the dicarboxylic acid component may be carried out using conventional polyester polymerization conditions. For example, when preparing the sulfopolyesters by means of an ester interchange reaction, i.e., from the ester form of the dicarboxylic acid components, the reaction process may comprise two steps. In the first step, the diol component and the dicarboxylic acid component, such as, for example, dimethyl isophthalate, are reacted at elevated temperatures, typically, about 150° C. to about 250° C. for about 0.5 to about 8 hours at pressures ranging from about 0.0 kPa gauge to about 414 kPa gauge (60 pounds per square inch, “psig”). Preferably, the temperature for the ester interchange reaction ranges from about 180° C. to about 230° C. for about 1 to about 4 hours while the preferred pressure ranges from about 103 kPa gauge (15 psig) to about 276 kPa gauge (40 psig). Thereafter, the reaction product is heated under higher temperatures and under reduced pressure to form sulfopolyester with the elimination of diol, which is readily volatilized under these conditions and removed from the system. This second step, or polycondensation step, is continued under higher vacuum and a temperature which generally ranges from about 230° C. to about 350° C., preferably about 250° C. to about 310° C. and most preferably about 260° C. to about 290° C. for about 0.1 to about 6 hours, or preferably, for about 0.2 to about 2 hours, until a polymer having the desired degree of polymerization, as determined by inherent viscosity, is obtained. The polycondensation step may be conducted under reduced pressure which ranges from about 53 kPa (400 torr) to about 0.013 kPa (0.1 torr). Stirring or appropriate conditions are used in both stages to ensure adequate heat transfer and surface renewal of the reaction mixture. The reactions of both stages are facilitated by appropriate catalysts such as, for example, alkoxy titanium compounds, alkali metal hydroxides and alcoholates, salts of organic carboxylic acids, alkyl tin compounds, metal oxides, and the like. A three-stage manufacturing procedure, similar to that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,290,631, may also be used, particularly when a mixed monomer feed of acids and esters is employed.
To ensure that the reaction of the diol component and dicarboxylic acid component by an ester interchange reaction mechanism is driven to completion, it is preferred to employ about 1.05 to about 2.5 moles of diol component to one mole dicarboxylic acid component. Persons of skill in the art will understand, however, that the ratio of diol component to dicarboxylic acid component is generally determined by the design of the reactor in which the reaction process occurs.
In the preparation of sulfopolyester by direct esterification, i.e., from the acid form of the dicarboxylic acid component, sulfopolyesters are produced by reacting the dicarboxylic acid or a mixture of dicarboxylic acids with the diol component or a mixture of diol components. The reaction is conducted at a pressure of from about 7 kPa gauge (1 psig) to about 1379 kPa gauge (200 psig), preferably less than 689 kPa (100 psig) to produce a low molecular weight, linear or branched sulfopolyester product having an average degree of polymerization of from about 1.4 to about 10. The temperatures employed during the direct esterification reaction typically range from about 180° C. to about 280° C., more preferably ranging from about 220° C. to about 270° C. This low molecular weight polymer may then be polymerized by a polycondensation reaction.
The water dispersible and multicomponent fibers and fibrous articles of this invention also may contain other conventional additives and ingredients which do not deleteriously affect their end use. For example, additives such as fillers, surface friction modifiers, light and heat stabilizers, extrusion aids, antistatic agents, colorants, dyes, pigments, fluorescent brighteners, antimicrobials, anticounterfeiting markers, hydrophobic and hydrophilic enhancers, viscosity modifiers, slip agents, tougheners, adhesion promoters, and the like may be used.
The fibers and fibrous articles of our invention do not require the presence of additives such as, for example, pigments, fillers, oils, waxes, or fatty acid finishes, to prevent blocking or fusing of the fibers during processing. The terms “blocking or fusing”, as used herein, is understood to mean that the fibers or fibrous articles stick together or fuse into a mass such that the fiber cannot be processed or used for its intended purpose. Blocking and fusing can occur during processing of the fiber or fibrous article or during storage over a period of days or weeks and is exacerbated under hot, humid conditions.
In one embodiment of the invention, the fibers and fibrous articles will contain less than 10 wt % of such anti-blocking additives, based on the total weight of the fiber or fibrous article. For example, the fibers and fibrous articles may contain less than 10 wt % of a pigment or filler. In other examples, the fibers and fibrous articles may contain less than 9 wt %, less than 5 wt %, less than 3 wt %, less than 1 wt %, and 0 wt % of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber. Colorants, sometimes referred to as toners, may be added to impart a desired neutral hue and/or brightness to the sulfopolyester. When colored fibers are desired, pigments or colorants may be included in the sulfopolyester reaction mixture during the reaction of the diol monomer and the dicarboxylic acid monomer or they may be melt blended with the preformed sulfopolyester. A preferred method of including colorants is to use a colorant having thermally stable organic colored compounds having reactive groups such that the colorant is copolymerized and incorporated into the sulfopolyester to improve its hue. For example, colorants such as dyes possessing reactive hydroxyl and/or carboxyl groups, including, but not limited to, blue and red substituted anthraquinones, may be copolymerized into the polymer chain.
When dyes are employed as colorants, they may be added to the copolyester reaction process after an ester interchange or direct esterification reaction.
For the purposes of this invention, the term “fiber” refers to a polymeric body of high aspect ratio capable of being formed into two or three dimensional articles such as woven or nonwoven fabrics. In the context of the present invention, the term “fiber” is synonymous with “fibers” and intended to mean one or more fibers. The fibers of our invention may be unicomponent fibers, bicomponent, or multicomponent fibers. The term “unicomponent fiber”, as used herein, is intended to mean a fiber prepared by melt spinning a single sulfopolyester, blends of one or more sulfopolyesters, or blends of one or more sulfopolyesters with one or more additional polymers and includes staple, monofilament, and multifilament fibers. “Unicomponent” is intended to be synonymous with the term “monocomponent” and includes “biconstituent” or “multiconstituent” fibers, and refers to fibers which have been formed from at least two polymers extruded from the same extruder as a blend. Unicomponent or biconstituent fibers do not have the various polymer components arranged in relatively constantly positioned distinct zones across the cross-sectional area of the fiber and the various polymers are usually not continuous along the entire length of the fiber, instead usually forming fibrils or protofibrils which start and end at random. Thus, the term “unicomponent” is not intended to exclude fibers formed from a polymer or blends of one or more polymers to which small amounts of additives may be added for coloration, anti-static properties, lubrication, hydrophilicity, etc.
By contrast, the term “multicomponent fiber”, as used herein, intended to mean a fiber prepared by melting the two or more fiber forming polymers in separate extruders and by directing the resulting multiple polymer flows into one spinneret with a plurality of distribution flow paths but spun together to form one fiber. Multicomponent fibers are also sometimes referred to as conjugate or bicomponent fibers. The polymers are arranged in substantially constantly positioned distinct segments or zones across the cross-section of the conjugate fibers and extend continuously along the length of the conjugate fibers. The configuration of such a multicomponent fiber may be, for example, a sheath/core arrangement wherein one polymer is surrounded by another or may be a side by side arrangement, a pie arrangement or an “islands-in-the-sea” arrangement. For example, a multicomponent fiber may be prepared by extruding the sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers separately through a spinneret having a shaped or engineered transverse geometry such as, for example, an “islands-in-the-sea” or segmented pie configuration. Unicomponent fibers, typically, are staple, monofilament or multifilament fibers that have a shaped or round cross-section. Most fiber forms are heatset. The fiber may include the various antioxidants, pigments, and additives as described herein.
Monofilament fibers generally range in size from about 15 to about 8000 denier per filament (abbreviated herein as “d/f”). Our novel fibers typically will have d/f values in the range of about 40 to about 5000. Monofilaments may be in the form of unicomponent or multicomponent fibers. The multifilament fibers of our invention will preferably range in size from about 1.5 micrometers for melt blown webs, about 0.5 to about 50 d/f for staple fibers, and up to about 5000 d/f for monofilament fibers. Multifilament fibers may also be used as crimped or uncrimped yarns and tows. Fibers used in melt blown web and melt spun fabrics may be produced in microdenier sizes. The term “microdenier”, as used herein, is intended to mean a d/f value of 1 d/f or less. For example, the microdenier fibers of the instant invention typically have d/f values of 1 or less, 0.5 or less, or 0.1 or less. Nanofibers can also be produced by electrostatic spinning.
As noted hereinabove, the sulfopolyesters also are advantageous for the preparation of bicomponent and multicomponent fibers having a shaped cross section. We have discovered that sulfopolyesters or blends of sulfopolyesters having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least 57° C. are particularly useful for multicomponent fibers to prevent blocking and fusing of the fiber during spinning and take up. Thus, our invention provides a multicomponent fiber having shaped cross section, comprising:
(i) residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids;
(ii) about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and
(iv) 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof; and
wherein the fiber has an islands-in-the-sea or segmented pie cross section and contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber.
The dicarboxylic acids, diols, sulfopolyester, sulfomonomers, and branching monomers residues are as described previously for other embodiments of the invention. For multicomponent fibers, it is advantageous that the sulfopolyester have a Tg of at least 57° C. Further examples of glass transition temperatures that may be exhibited by the sulfopolyester or sulfopolyester blend of our multicomponent fiber are at least 60° C., at least 65° C., at least 70° C., at least 75° C., at least 80° C., at least 85° C., and at least 90° C. Further, to obtain a sulfopolyester with a Tg of at least 57° C., blends of one or more sulfopolyesters may be used in varying proportions to obtain a sulfopolyester blend having the desired Tg. The Tg of a sulfopolyester blend may be calculated by using a weighted average of the Tg's of the sulfopolyester components. For example, sulfopolyester having a Tg of 48° C. may be blended in a 25:75 wt:wt ratio with another sulfopolyester having Tg of 65° C. to give a sulfopolyester blend having a Tg of approximately 61° C.
In another embodiment of the invention, the water dispersible sulfopolyester component of the multicomponent fiber presents properties which allow at least one of the following:
Therefore, in this embodiment of the invention, a multicomponent fiber is provided having a shaped cross section comprising:
wherein the fiber has an as-spun denier of less than about 6 denier per filament;
wherein the water dispersible sulfopolyesters exhibits a melt viscosity of less than about 12,000 poise measured at 240° C. at a strain rate of 1 rad/sec, and
wherein the sulfopolyester comprises less than about 25 mole % of residues of at least one sulfomonomer, based on the total moles of diacid or diol residues.
The sulfopolyester utilized in these multicomponent fibers has a melt viscosity of generally less than about 12,000 poise. Preferably, the melt viscosity of the sulfopolyester is less than 10,000 poise, more preferably, less than 6,000, and most preferably, less than 4,000 poise measured at 240° C. and 1 rad/sec shear rate. In another aspect, the sulfopolyester exhibits a melt viscosity of between about 1000-12000 poise, more preferably between 2000-6000 poise, and most preferably between 2500-4000 poise measured at 240° C. and 1 rad/sec shear rate. Prior to determining the viscosity, the samples are dried at 60° C. in a vacuum oven for 2 days. The melt viscosity is measured on rheometer using a 25 mm diameter parallel-plate geometry at 1 mm gap setting. A dynamic frequency sweep is run at a strain rate range of 1 to 400 rad/sec and 10% strain amplitude. The viscosity is then measured at 240° C. and strain rate of 1 rad/sec.
The level of sulfomonomer residues in the sulfopolyester polymers for use in accordance with this aspect of the present invention is generally less than about 25 mole %, and preferably, less than 20 mole %, reported as a percentage of the total diacid or diol residues in the sulfopolyester. More preferably, this level is between about 4 to about 20 mole %, even more preferably between about 5 to about 12 mole %, and most preferably between about 7 to about 10 mole %. Sulfomonomers for use with the invention preferably have 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof. A sodiosulfo-isophthalic acid monomer is particularly preferred.
In addition to the sulfomonomer described previously, the sulfopolyester preferably comprises residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids, one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500, and 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the sulfopolyester comprises from about 80-96 mole % dicarboxylic acid residues, from about 4 to about 20 mole % sulfomonomer residues, and 100 mole % diol residues (there being a total mole % of 200%, i.e., 100 mole % diacid and 100 mole % diol). More specifically, the dicarboxylic portion of the sulfopolyester comprises between about 60-80 mole % terephthalic acid, about 0-30 mole % isophthalic acid, and about 4-20 mole % 5-sodiosulfoisophthalic acid (5-SSIPA). The diol portion comprises from about 0-50 mole % diethylene glycol and from about 50-100 mole % ethylene glycol. An exemplary formulation according to this embodiment of the invention is set forth subsequently.
The water non-dispersible component of the multicomponent fiber may comprise any of those water non-dispersible polymers described herein. Spinning of the fiber may also occur according to any method described herein. However, the improved rheological properties of multicomponent fibers in accordance with this aspect of the invention provide for enhanced drawings speeds. When the sulfopolyester and water non-dispersible polymer are extruded to produce multicomponent extrudates, the multicomponent extrudate is capable of being melt drawn to produce the multicomponent fiber, using any of the methods disclosed herein, at a speed of at least about 2000 m/min, more preferably at least about 3000 m/min, even more preferably at least about 4000 m/min, and most preferably at least about 4500 m/min. Although not intending to be bound by theory, melt drawing of the multicomponent extrudates at these speeds results in at least some oriented crystallinity in the water non-dispersible component of the multicomponent fiber. This oriented crystallinity can increase the dimensional stability of non-woven materials made from the multicomponent fibers during subsequent processing.
Another advantage of the multicomponent extrudate is that it can be melt drawn to a multicomponent fiber having an as-spun denier of less than 6 deniers per filament. Other ranges of multicomponent fiber sizes include an as-spun denier of less than 4 deniers per filament and less than 2.5 deniers per filament.
Therefore, in another embodiment of the invention, a multicomponent extrudate having a shaped cross section, comprising:
wherein the extrudate is capable of being melt drawn at a speed of at least about 2000 m/min.
The multicomponent fiber comprises a plurality of segments or domains of one or more water non-dispersible polymers immiscible with the sulfopolyester in which the segments or domains are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the segments or domains. The term “substantially isolated”, as used herein, is intended to mean that the segments or domains are set apart from each other to permit the segments domains to form individual fibers upon removal of the sulfopolyester. For example, the segments or domains may be touching each others as in, for example, a segmented pie configuration but can be split apart by impact or when the sulfopolyester is removed.
The ratio by weight of the sulfopolyester to water non-dispersible polymer component in the multicomponent fiber of the invention is generally in the range of about 60:40 to about 2:98 or, in another example, in the range of about 50:50 to about 5:95. Typically, the sulfopolyester comprises 50% by weight or less of the total weight of the multicomponent fiber.
The segments or domains of multicomponent fiber may comprise one of more water non-dispersible polymers. Examples of water non-dispersible polymers which may be used in segments of the multicomponent fiber include, but are not limited to, polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, polylactides, polycaprolactone, polycarbonate, polyurethane, and polyvinyl chloride. For example, the water non-dispersible polymer may be polyester such as poly(ethylene)terephthalate, poly(butylene)terephthalate, poly(cyclohexylene)cyclohexanedicarboxylate, poly(cyclohexylene)terephthalate, poly(trimethylene)terephthalate, and the like. In another example, the water non-dispersible polymer can be biodistintegratable as determined by DIN Standard 54900 and/or biodegradable as determined by ASTM Standard Method, D6340-98. Examples of biodegradable polyesters and polyester blends are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,599,858; 5,580,911; 5,446,079; and 5,559,171. The term “biodegradable”, as used herein in reference to the water non-dispersible polymers of the present invention, is understood to mean that the polymers are degraded under environmental influences such as, for example, in a composting environment, in an appropriate and demonstrable time span as defined, for example, by ASTM Standard Method, D6340-98, entitled “Standard Test Methods for Determining Aerobic Biodegradation of Radiolabeled Plastic Materials in an Aqueous or Compost Environment”. The water non-dispersible polymers of the present invention also may be “biodisintegratable”, meaning that the polymers are easily fragmented in a composting environment as defined, for example, by DIN Standard 54900. For example, the biodegradable polymer is initially reduced in molecular weight in the environment by the action of heat, water, air, microbes and other factors. This reduction in molecular weight results in a loss of physical properties (tenacity) and often in fiber breakage. Once the molecular weight of the polymer is sufficiently low, the monomers and oligomers are then assimilated by the microbes. In an aerobic environment, these monomers or oligomers are ultimately oxidized to CO2, H2O, and new cell biomass. In an anaerobic environment, the monomers or oligomers are ultimately converted to CO2, H2, acetate, methane, and cell biomass.
For example, water non-dispersible polymer may be an aliphatic-aromatic polyester, abbreviated herein as “AAPE”. The term “aliphatic-aromatic polyester”, as used herein, means a polyester comprising a mixture of residues from aliphatic or cycloaliphatic dicarboxylic acids or diols and aromatic dicarboxylic acids or diols. The term “non-aromatic”, as used herein with respect to the dicarboxylic acid and diol monomers of the present invention, means that carboxyl or hydroxyl groups of the monomer are not connected through an aromatic nucleus. For example, adipic acid contains no aromatic nucleus in its backbone, i.e., the chain of carbon atoms connecting the carboxylic acid groups, thus is “non-aromatic”. By contrast, the term “aromatic” means the dicarboxylic acid or diol contains an aromatic nucleus in the backbone such as, for example, terephthalic acid or 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid. “Non-aromatic”, therefore, is intended to include both aliphatic and cycloaliphatic structures such as, for example, diols and dicarboxylic acids, which contain as a backbone a straight or branched chain or cyclic arrangement of the constituent carbon atoms which may be saturated or paraffinic in nature, unsaturated, i.e., containing non-aromatic carbon-carbon double bonds, or acetylenic, i.e., containing carbon-carbon triple bonds. Thus, in the context of the description and the claims of the present invention, non-aromatic is intended to include linear and branched, chain structures (referred to herein as “aliphatic”) and cyclic structures (referred to herein as “alicyclic” or “cycloaliphatic”). The term “non-aromatic”, however, is not intended to exclude any aromatic substituents which may be attached to the backbone of an aliphatic or cycloaliphatic diol or dicarboxylic acid. In the present invention, the difunctional carboxylic acid typically is a aliphatic dicarboxylic acid such as, for example, adipic acid, or an aromatic dicarboxylic acid such as, for example, terephthalic acid. The difunctional hydroxyl compound may be cycloaliphatic diol such as, for example, 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, a linear or branched aliphatic diol such as, for example, 1,4-butanediol, or an aromatic diol such as, for example, hydroquinone.
The AAPE may be a linear or branched random copolyester and/or chain extended copolyester comprising diol residues which comprise the residues of one or more substituted or unsubstituted, linear or branched, diols selected from aliphatic diols containing 2 to about 8 carbon atoms, polyalkylene ether glycols containing 2 to 8 carbon atoms, and cycloaliphatic diols containing about 4 to about 12 carbon atoms. The substituted diols, typically, will comprise 1 to about 4 substituents independently selected from halo, C6-C10 aryl, and C1-C4 alkoxy. Examples of diols which may be used include, but are not limited to, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, polyethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexanediol, thio-diethanol, 1,3-cyclohexanedimethanol, 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol, triethylene glycol, and tetraethylene glycol with the preferred diols comprising one or more diols selected from 1,4-butanediol; 1,3-propanediol; ethylene glycol; 1,6-hexanediol; diethylene glycol; or 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol. The AAPE also comprises diacid residues which contain about 35 to about 99 mole %, based on the total moles of diacid residues, of the residues of one or more substituted or unsubstituted, linear or branched, non-aromatic dicarboxylic acids selected from aliphatic dicarboxylic acids containing 2 to about 12 carbon atoms and cycloaliphatic acids containing about 5 to about 10 carbon atoms. The substituted non-aromatic dicarboxylic acids will typically contain 1 to about 4 substituents selected from halo, C6-C10 aryl, and C1-C4 alkoxy. Non-limiting examples of non-aromatic diacids include malonic, succinic, glutaric, adipic, pimelic, azelaic, sebacic, fumaric, 2,2-dimethyl glutaric, suberic, 1,3-cyclopentanedicarboxylic, 1,4-cyclohexane-dicarboxylic, 1,3-cyclohexanedicarboxylic, diglycolic, itaconic, maleic, and 2,5-norbornanedicarboxylic. In addition to the non-aromatic dicarboxylic acids, the AAPE comprises about 1 to about 65 mole %, based on the total moles of diacid residues, of the residues of one or more substituted or unsubstituted aromatic dicarboxylic acids containing 6 to about 10 carbon atoms. In the case where substituted aromatic dicarboxylic acids are used, they will typically contain 1 to about 4 substituents selected from halo, C6-C10 aryl, and C1-C4 alkoxy. Non-limiting examples of aromatic dicarboxylic acids which may be used in the AAPE of our invention are terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, salts of 5-sulfoisophthalic acid, and 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid. More preferably, the non-aromatic dicarboxylic acid will comprise adipic acid, the aromatic dicarboxylic acid will comprise terephthalic acid, and the diol will comprise 1,4-butanediol.
Other possible compositions for the AAPE's of our invention are those prepared from the following diols and dicarboxylic acids (or polyester-forming equivalents thereof such as diesters) in the following mole percentages, based on 100 mole percent of a diacid component and 100 mole percent of a diol component:
The modifying diol preferably is selected from 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, triethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol and neopentyl glycol. The most preferred AAPE's are linear, branched or chain extended copolyesters comprising about 50 to about 60 mole percent adipic acid residues, about 40 to about 50 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and at least 95 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues. Even more preferably, the adipic acid residues comprise about 55 to about 60 mole percent, the terephthalic acid residues comprise about 40 to about 45 mole percent, and the diol residues comprise about 95 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues. Such compositions are commercially available under the trademark EASTAR BIO® copolyester from Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, Tenn., and under the trademark ECOFLEX® from BASF Corporation.
Additional, specific examples of preferred AAPE's include a poly(tetra-methylene glutarate-co-terephthalate) containing (a) 50 mole percent glutaric acid residues, 50 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and 100 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues, (b) 60 mole percent glutaric acid residues, 40 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and 100 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues or (c) 40 mole percent glutaric acid residues, 60 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and 100 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues; a poly(tetramethylene-succinate-co-terephthalate) containing (a) 85 mole percent succinic acid residues, 15 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and 100 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues or (b) 70 mole percent succinic acid residues, 30 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and 100 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues; a poly(ethylene succinate-co-terephthalate) containing 70 mole percent succinic acid residues, 30 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and 100 mole percent ethylene glycol residues; and a poly(tetramethylene adipate-co-terephthalate) containing (a) 85 mole percent adipic acid residues, 15 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and 100 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues; or (b) 55 mole percent adipic acid residues, 45 mole percent terephthalic acid residues, and 100 mole percent 1,4-butanediol residues.
The AAPE preferably comprises from about 10 to about 1,000 repeating units and preferably, from about 15 to about 600 repeating units. The AAPE may have an inherent viscosity of about 0.4 to about 2.0 dL/g, or more preferably about 0.7 to about 1.6 dL/g, as measured at a temperature of 25° C. using a concentration of 0.5 gram copolyester in 100 ml of a 60/40 by weight solution of phenol/tetrachloroethane.
The AAPE, optionally, may contain the residues of a branching agent. The mole percentage ranges for the branching agent are from about 0 to about 2 mole %, preferably about 0.1 to about 1 mole %, and most preferably about 0.1 to about 0.5 mole % based on the total moles of diacid or diol residues (depending on whether the branching agent contains carboxyl or hydroxyl groups). The branching agent preferably has a weight average molecular weight of about 50 to about 5000, more preferably about 92 to about 3000, and a functionality of about 3 to about 6. The branching agent, for example, may be the esterified residue of a polyol having 3 to 6 hydroxyl groups, a polycarboxylic acid having 3 or 4 carboxyl groups (or ester-forming equivalent groups) or a hydroxy acid having a total of 3 to 6 hydroxyl and carboxyl groups. In addition, the AAPE may be branched by the addition of a peroxide during reactive extrusion.
Each segment of the water non-dispersible polymer may be different from others in fineness and may be arranged in any shaped or engineered cross-sectional geometry known to persons skilled in the art. For example, the sulfopolyester and a water non-dispersible polymer may be used to prepare a bicomponent fiber having an engineered geometry such as, for example, a side-by-side, “islands-in-the-sea”, segmented pie, other splitables, sheath/core, or other configurations known to persons skilled in the art. Other multicomponent configurations are also possible. Subsequent removal of a side, the “sea”, or a portion of the “pie” can result in very fine fibers. The process of preparing bicomponent fibers also is well known to persons skilled in the art. In a bicomponent fiber, the sulfopolyester fibers of this invention may be present in amounts of about 10 to about 90 weight % and will generally be used in the sheath portion of sheath/core fibers. The other component may be from a wide range of other polymeric materials such as, for example, poly(ethylene)terephthalate, poly(butylene)terephthalate, poly(trimethylene)terephthalate, polylactides and the like as well as polyolefins, cellulose esters, and polyamides. Typically, when a water-insoluble or water non-dispersible polymer is used, the resulting bicomponent or multicomponent fiber is not completely water-dispersible. Side by side combinations with significant differences in thermal shrinkage can be utilized for the development of a spiral crimp. If crimping is desired, a saw tooth or stuffer box crimp is generally suitable for many applications. If the second polymer component is in the core of a sheath/core configuration, such a core optionally may be stabilized.
The sulfopolyesters are particularly useful for fibers having an “islands-in-the-sea” or “segmented pie” cross section as they only requires neutral or slightly acidic (i.e., “soft” water) to disperse, as compared to the caustic-containing solutions that are sometimes required to remove other water dispersible polymers from multicomponent fibers. Thus another aspect of our invention is a multicomponent fiber, comprising:
(i) about 50 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid, based on the total acid residues;
(ii) about 4 to about 30 mole %, based on the total acid residues, of a residue of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500;
(iv) 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof; and
wherein the fiber has an islands-in-the-sea or segmented pie cross section and contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber.
The dicarboxylic acids, diols, sulfopolyester, sulfomonomers, branching monomers residues, and water non-dispersible polymers are as described previously. For multicomponent fibers, it is advantageous that sulfopolyester have a Tg of at least 57° C. The sulfopolyester may be a single sulfopolyester or a blend of one or more sulfopolyester polymers. Further examples of glass transition temperatures that may be exhibited by the sulfopolyester or sulfopolyester blends are at least 65° C., at least 70° C., at least 75° C., at least 85° C., and at least 90° C. For example, the sulfopolyester may comprise about 75 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid and about 25 to about 95 mole % of a residue of diethylene glycol. As described hereinabove, examples of the water non-dispersible polymers are polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, polylactides, polycaprolactone, polycarbonate, polyurethane, and polyvinyl chloride. In addition, the water non-dispersible polymer may be biodegradable or biodisintegratable. For example, the water non-dispersible polymer may be an aliphatic-aromatic polyester as described previously.
Our novel multicomponent fiber may be prepared by any number of methods known to persons skilled in the art. The present invention thus provides a process for a multicomponent fiber having a shaped cross section comprising: spinning a water dispersible sulfopolyester having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least 57° C. and one or more water non-dispersible polymers immiscible with the sulfopolyester into a fiber, the sulfopolyester comprising:
(i) residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids;
(ii) about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and
(iv) 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
wherein the fiber has a plurality of segments comprising the water non-dispersible polymers and the segments are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the segments and the fiber contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber. For example, the multicomponent fiber may be prepared by melting the sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers in separate extruders and directing the individual polymer flows into one spinneret or extrusion die with a plurality of distribution flow paths such that the water non-dispersible polymer component form small segments or thin strands which are substantially isolated from each other by the intervening sulfopolyester. The cross section of such a fiber may be, for example, a segmented pie arrangement or an islands-in-the-sea arrangement. In another example, the sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers are separately fed to the spinneret orifices and then extruded in sheath-core form in which the water non-dispersible polymer forms a “core” that is substantially enclosed by the sulfopolyester “sheath” polymer. In the case of such concentric fibers, the orifice supplying the “core” polymer is in the center of the spinning orifice outlet and flow conditions of core polymer fluid are strictly controlled to maintain the concentricity of both components when spinning. Modifications in spinneret orifices enable different shapes of core and/or sheath to be obtained within the fiber cross-section. In yet another example, a multicomponent fiber having a side-by-side cross section or configuration may be produced by coextruding the water dispersible sulfopolyester and water non-dispersible polymer through orifices separately and converging the separate polymer streams at substantially the same speed to merge side-by-side as a combined stream below the face of the spinneret; or (2) by feeding the two polymer streams separately through orifices, which converge at the surface of the spinneret, at substantially the same speed to merge side-by-side as a combined stream at the surface of the spinneret. In both cases, the velocity of each polymer stream, at the point of merge, is determined by its metering pump speed, the number of orifices, and the size of the orifice.
The dicarboxylic acids, diols, sulfopolyester, sulfomonomers, branching monomers residues, and water non-dispersible polymers are as described previously. The sulfopolyester has a glass transition temperature of at least 57° C. Further examples of glass transition temperatures that may be exhibited by the sulfopolyester or sulfopolyester blend are at least 65° C., at least 70° C., at least 75° C., at least 85° C., and at least 90° C. In one example, the sulfopolyester may comprise about 50 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid, based on the total acid residues; and about 4 to about 30 mole %, based on the total acid residues, of a residue of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid; and 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof. In another example, the sulfopolyester may comprise about 75 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid and about 25 to about 95 mole % of a residue of diethylene glycol. As described hereinabove, examples of the water non-dispersible polymers are polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, polylactides, polycaprolactone, polycarbonate, polyurethane, and polyvinyl chloride. In addition, the water non-dispersible polymer may be biodegradable or biodisintegratable. For example, the water non-dispersible polymer may be an aliphatic-aromatic polyester as described previously. Examples of shaped cross sections include, but are not limited to, islands-in-the-sea, side-by-side, sheath-core, or segmented pie configurations.
In another embodiment of the invention, a process for making a multicomponent fiber having a shaped cross section is provided comprising: spinning at least one water dispersible sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers immiscible with the sulfopolyester to produce a multicomponent fiber, wherein the multicomponent fiber has a plurality of domains comprising the water non-dispersible polymers and the domains are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the domains; wherein the water dispersible sulfopolyester exhibits a melt viscosity of less than about 12,000 poise measured at 240° C. at a strain rate of 1 rad/sec, and wherein the sulfopolyester comprising less than about 25 mole % of residues of at least one sulfomonomer, based on the total moles of diacid or diol residues; and wherein the multicomponent fiber has an as-spun denier of less than about 6 denier per filament.
The sulfopolyester utilized in these multicomponent fiber and the water non-dispersible polymers were discussed previously in this disclosure.
In another embodiment of this invention, a process for making a multicomponent fiber having a shaped cross section is provided comprising:
It is also a feature of this embodiment of the invention that the process includes the step of melt drawing the multicomponent extrudate at a speed of at least about 2000 m/min, more preferably, at least about 3000 m/min, and most preferably at least 4500 m/min.
Typically, upon exiting the spinneret, the fibers are quenched with a cross flow of air whereupon the fibers solidify. Various finishes and sizes may be applied to the fiber at this stage. The cooled fibers, typically, are subsequently drawn and wound up on a take up spool. Other additives may be incorporated in the finish in effective amounts like emulsifiers, antistatics, antimicrobials, antifoams, lubricants, thermostabilizers, UV stabilizers, and the like.
Optionally, the drawn fibers may be textured and wound-up to form a bulky continuous filament. This one-step technique is known in the art as spin-draw-texturing. Other embodiments include flat filament (non-textured) yarns, or cut staple fiber, either crimped or uncrimped.
The sulfopolyester may be later removed by dissolving the interfacial layers or pie segments and leaving the smaller filaments or microdenier fibers of the water non-dispersible polymer(s). Our invention thus provides a process for microdenier fibers comprising:
(i) about 50 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid, based on the total acid residues;
(ii) about 4 to about 30 mole %, based on the total acid residues, of a residue of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and
(iv) 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
wherein the fibers have a plurality of segments comprising the water non-dispersible polymers wherein the segments are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the segments and the fibers contain less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fibers; and
Typically, the multicomponent fiber is contacted with water at a temperature of about 25° C. to about 100° C., preferably about 50° C. to about 80° C. for a time period of from about 10 to about 600 seconds whereby the sulfopolyester is dissipated or dissolved. After removal of the sulfopolyester, the remaining microfibers typically will have an average fineness of 1 d/f or less, typically, 0.5 d/f or less, or more typically, 0.1 d/f or less. Typical applications of these remaining microfibers include artificial leathers, suedes, wipes, and filter media. The ionic nature of sulfopolyesters also results in advantageously poor “solubility” in saline media, such as body fluids. Such properties are desirable in personal care products and cleaning wipes that are flushable or otherwise disposed in sanitary sewage systems. Selected sulfopolyesters have also been utilized as dispersing agents in dye baths and soil redeposition preventative agents during laundry cycles.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a process for making microdenier fibers is provided comprising spinning at least one water dispersible sulfopolyester and one or more water non-dispersible polymers immiscible with the water dispersible sulfopolyester into multicomponent fibers, wherein said multicomponent fibers have a plurality of domains comprising said water non-dispersible polymers wherein the domains are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the domains; wherein the fiber has an as-spun denier of less than about 6 denier per filament; wherein the water dispersible sulfopolyester exhibits a melt viscosity of less than about 12,000 poise measured at 240° C. at a strain rate of 1 rad/sec, and wherein the sulfopolyester comprising less than about 25 mole % of residues of at least one sulfomonomer, based on the total moles of diacid or diol residues; and contacting the multicomponent fibers with water to remove the water dispersible sulfopolyester thereby forming microdenier fibers.
In another embodiment of the invention, a process for making microdenier fibers is provided comprising:
It is preferable that the melt drawing of the multicomponent extrudates at a speed of at least about 2000 m/min, more preferably at least about 3000 m/min, and most preferably at least 4500 m/min.
Such sulfomonomers and sulfopolyesters suitable for use in accordance with the invention are described above.
As the preferred sulfopolyesters for use in accordance with this aspect of the invention are generally resistant to removal during subsequent hydroentangling processes, it is preferable that the water used to remove the sulfopolyester from the multicomponent fibers be above room temperature, more preferably the water is at least about 45° C., even more preferably at least about 60° C., and most preferably at least about 80° C.
The instant invention also includes a fibrous article comprising the water-dispersible fiber, the multicomponent fiber, or the microdenier fibers described hereinabove. The term “fibrous article” is understood to mean any article having or resembling fibers. Non-limiting examples of fibrous articles include multifilament fibers, yarns, cords, tapes, fabrics, melt blown webs, spunbonded webs, thermobonded webs, hydroentangled webs, nonwoven webs and fabrics, and combinations thereof; items having one or more layers of fibers, such as, for example, multilayer nonwovens, laminates, and composites from such fibers, gauzes, bandages, diapers, training pants, tampons, surgical gowns and masks, feminine napkins; and the like. Further, the fibrous articles may include replacement inserts for various personal hygiene and cleaning products. The fibrous article of the present invention may be bonded, laminated, attached to, or used in conjunction with other materials which may or may not be water-dispersible. The fibrous article, for example, a nonwoven fabric layer, may be bonded to a flexible plastic film or backing of a water non-dispersible material, such as polyethylene. Such an assembly, for example, could be used as one component of a disposable diaper. In addition, the fibrous article may result from overblowing fibers onto another substrate to form highly assorted combinations of engineered melt blown, spunbond, film, or membrane structures.
The fibrous articles of the instant invention include nonwoven fabrics and webs. A nonwoven fabric is defined as a fabric made directly from fibrous webs without weaving or knitting operations. For example, the multicomponent fiber of the present invention may be formed into a fabric by any known fabric forming process like knitting, weaving, needle punching, and hydroentangling. The resulting fabric or web may be converted into a microdenier fiber web by exerting sufficient force to cause the multicomponent fibers to split or by contacting the web with water to remove the sulfopolyester leaving the remaining microdenier fibers behind. Our invention thus provides a process for a microdenier fiber web, comprising:
(i) about 50 to about 96 mole % of one or more residues of isophthalic acid or terephthalic acid, based on the total acid residues;
(ii) about 4 to about 30 mole %, based on the total acid residues, of a residue of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 25 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; and
(iv) 0 to about 20 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof.
wherein the multicomponent fibers have a plurality of segments comprising the water non-dispersible polymers wherein the segments are substantially isolated from each other by the sulfopolyester intervening between the segments; and the fiber contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the fiber;
In another embodiment of the invention, a process for a microdenier fiber web is provided which comprises:
In another embodiment of the invention, a process for a microdenier fiber web is provided which comprises:
The process also preferably comprises prior to Step (C) the step of hydroentangling the multicomponent fibers of the non-woven web. It is also preferable that the hydroentangling step results in a loss of less than about 20 wt. % of the sulfopolyester contained in the multicomponent fibers, more preferably this loss is less than 15 wt. %, and most preferably is less than 10 wt. %. In furtherance of the goal of reducing the loss of sulfopolyester during hydroentanglement, the water used during this process preferably has a temperature of less than about 45° C., more preferably less than about 35° C., and most preferably less than about 30° C. It is preferable that the water used during hydroentanglement be as close to room temperature as possible to minimize loss of sulfopolyester from the multicomponent fibers. Conversely, removal of the sulfopolyester polymer during Step (C) is preferably carried out using water having a temperature of at least about 45° C., more preferably at least about 60° C., and most preferably at least about 80° C.
After hydroentanglement and prior to Step (C), the non-woven web may under go a heat setting step comprising heating the non-woven web to a temperature of at least about 100° C., and more preferably at least about 120° C. The heat setting step relaxes out internal fiber stresses and aids in producing a dimensionally stable fabric product. It is preferred that when the heat set material is reheated to the temperature to which it was heated during the heat setting step that it exhibits surface area shrinkage of less than about 5% of its original surface area. More preferably, the shrinkage is less than about 2% of the original surface area, and most preferably the shrinkage is less than about 1%.
The sulfopolyester used in the multicomponent fiber can be any of those described herein, however, it is preferable that the sulfopolyester have a melt viscosity of less than about 6000 poise measured at 240° C. at a strain rate of 1 rad/sec and comprise less than about 12 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer. These types of sulfopolyesters are previously described herein.
Furthermore, the inventive method preferably comprises the step of drawing the multicomponent fiber at a fiber velocity of at least 2000 m/min, more preferably at least about 3000 m/min, even more preferably at least about 4000 m/min, and most preferably at least about 5000 m/min.
The nonwoven assembly is held together by 1) mechanical fiber cohesion and interlocking in a web or mat; 2) various techniques of fusing of fibers, including the use of binder fibers, utilizing the thermoplastic properties of certain polymers and polymer blends; 3) use of a binding resin such as starch, casein, a cellulose derivative, or a synthetic resin, such as an acrylic latex or urethane; 4) powder adhesive binders; or 5) combinations thereof. The fibers are often deposited in a random manner, although orientation in one direction is possible, followed by bonding using one of the methods described above.
The fibrous articles of our invention further also may comprise one or more layers of water-dispersible fibers, multicomponent fibers, or microdenier fibers. The fiber layers may be one or more nonwoven fabric layers, a layer of loosely bound overlapping fibers, or a combination thereof. In addition, the fibrous articles may include personal and health care products such as, but not limited to, child care products, such as infant diapers; child training pants; adult care products, such as adult diapers and adult incontinence pads; feminine care products, such as feminine napkins, panty liners, and tampons; wipes; fiber-containing cleaning products; medical and surgical care products, such as medical wipes, tissues, gauzes, examination bed coverings, surgical masks, gowns, bandages, and wound dressings; fabrics; elastomeric yarns, wipes, tapes, other protective barriers, and packaging material. The fibrous articles may be used to absorb liquids or may be pre-moistened with various liquid compositions and used to deliver these compositions to a surface. Non-limiting examples of liquid compositions include detergents; wetting agents; cleaning agents; skin care products, such as cosmetics, ointments, medications, emollients, and fragrances. The fibrous articles also may include various powders and particulates to improve absorbency or as delivery vehicles. Examples of powders and particulates include, but are not limited to, talc, starches, various water absorbent, water-dispersible, or water swellable polymers, such as super absorbent polymers, sulfopolyesters, and poly(vinylalcohols), silica, pigments, and microcapsules. Additives may also be present, but are not required, as needed for specific applications. Examples of additives include, but are not limited to, oxidative stabilizers, UV absorbers, colorants, pigments, opacifiers (delustrants), optical brighteners, fillers, nucleating agents, plasticizers, viscosity modifiers, surface modifiers, antimicrobials, disinfectants, cold flow inhibitors, branching agents, and catalysts.
In addition to being water-dispersible, the fibrous articles described above may be flushable. The term “flushable” as used herein means capable of being flushed in a conventional toilet, and being introduced into a municipal sewage or residential septic system, without causing an obstruction or blockage in the toilet or sewage system.
The fibrous article may further comprise a water-dispersible film comprising a second water-dispersible polymer. The second water-dispersible polymer may be the same as or different from the previously described water-dispersible polymers used in the fibers and fibrous articles of the present invention. In one embodiment, for example, the second water-dispersible polymer may be an additional sulfopolyester which, in turn, comprises:
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500;
The additional sulfopolyester may contain other concentrations of isophthalic acid residues, for example, about 60 to about 95 mole %, and about 75 to about 95 mole %. Further examples of isophthalic acid residue concentrations ranges are about 70 to about 85 mole %, about 85 to about 95 mole % and about 90 to about 95 mole %. The additional sulfopolyester also may comprise about 25 to about 95 mole % of the residues of diethylene glycol. Further examples of diethylene glycol residue concentration ranges include about 50 to about 95 mole %, about 70 to about 95 mole %, and about 75 to about 95 mole %. The additional sulfopolyester also may include the residues of ethylene glycol and/or 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol. Typical concentration ranges of CHDM residues are about 10 to about 75 mole %, about 25 to about 65 mole %, and about 40 to about 60 mole %. Typical concentration ranges of ethylene glycol residues are about 10 to about 75 mole %, about 25 to about 65 mole %, and about 40 to about 60 mole %. In another embodiment, the additional sulfopolyester comprises is about 75 to about 96 mole % of the residues of isophthalic acid and about 25 to about 95 mole % of the residues of diethylene glycol.
According to the invention, the sulfopolyester film component of the fibrous article may be produced as a monolayer or multilayer film. The monolayer film may be produced by conventional casting techniques. The multilayered films may be produced by conventional lamination methods or the like. The film may be of any convenient thickness, but total thickness will normally be between about 2 and about 50 mil.
The film-containing fibrous articles may include one or more layers of water-dispersible fibers as described above. The fiber layers may be one or more nonwoven fabric layers, a layer of loosely bound overlapping fibers, or a combination thereof. In addition, the film-containing fibrous articles may include personal and health care products as described hereinabove.
As described previously, the fibrous articles also may include various powders and particulates to improve absorbency or as delivery vehicles. Thus, in one embodiment, our fibrous article comprises a powder comprising a third water-dispersible polymer that may be the same as or different from the water-dispersible polymer components described previously herein. Other examples of powders and particulates include, but are not limited to, talc, starches, various water absorbent, water-dispersible, or water swellable polymers, such as poly(acrylonitiles), sulfopolyesters, and poly(vinyl alcohols), silica, pigments, and microcapsules.
Our novel fiber and fibrous articles have many possible uses in addition to the applications described above. One novel application involves the melt blowing a film or nonwoven fabric onto flat, curved, or shaped surfaces to provide a protective layer. One such layer might provide surface protection to durable equipment during shipping. At the destination, before putting the equipment into service, the outer layers of sulfopolyester could be washed off. A further embodiment of this general application concept could involve articles of personal protection to provide temporary barrier layers for some reusable or limited use garments or coverings. For the military, activated carbon and chemical absorbers could be sprayed onto the attenuating filament pattern just prior to the collector to allow the melt blown matrix to anchor these entities on the exposed surface. The chemical absorbers can even be changed in the forward operations area as the threat evolves by melt blowing on another layer.
A major advantage inherent to sulfopolyesters is the facile ability to remove or recover the polymer from aqueous dispersions via flocculation or precipitation by adding ionic moieties (i.e., salts). Other methods, such as pH adjustment, adding nonsolvents, freezing, and so forth may also be employed. Therefore, fibrous articles, such as outer wear protective garments, after successful protective barrier use and even if the polymer is rendered as hazardous waste, can potentially be handled safely at much lower volumes for disposal using accepted protocols, such as incineration.
Undissolved or dried sulfopolyesters are known to form strong adhesive bonds to a wide array of substrates, including, but not limited to fluff pulp, cotton, acrylics, rayon, lyocell, PLA (polylactides), cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate propionate, poly(ethylene)terephthalate, poly(butylene)terephthalate, poly(trimethylene)terephthalate, poly(cyclohexylene)terephthalate, copolyesters, polyamides (nylons), stainless steel, aluminum, treated polyolefins, PAN (polyacrylonitriles), and polycarbonates. Thus, our nonwoven fabrics may be used as laminating adhesives or binders that may be bonded by known techniques, such as thermal, radio frequency (RF), microwave, and ultrasonic methods. Adaptation of sulfopolyesters to enable RF activation is disclosed in a number of recent patents. Thus, our novel nonwoven fabrics may have dual or even multifunctionality in addition to adhesive properties. For example, a disposable baby diaper could be obtained where a nonwoven of the present invention serves as both an water-responsive adhesive as well as a fluid managing component of the final assembly.
Our invention also provides a process for water-dispersible fibers comprising:
(i) residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids;
(ii) about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more metal sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof; and
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 20 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500; (iv) 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof; wherein the polymer composition contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the polymer composition; and (II) melt spinning filaments. As described hereinabove, a water-dispersible polymer, optionally, may be blended with the sulfopolyester. In addition, a water non-dispersible polymer, optionally, may be blended with the sulfopolyester to form a blend such that blend is an immiscible blend. The term “flow point”, as used herein, means the temperature at which the viscosity of the polymer composition permits extrusion or other forms of processing through a spinneret or extrusion die. The dicarboxylic acid residue may comprise from about 60 to about 100 mole % of the acid residues depending on the type and concentration of the sulfomonomer. Other examples of concentration ranges of dicarboxylic acid residues are from about 60 mole % to about 95 mole % and about 70 mole % to about 95 mole %. The preferred dicarboxylic acid residues are isophthalic, terephthalic, and 1,4-cyclohexane-dicarboxylic acids or if diesters are used, dimethyl terephthalate, dimethyl isophthalate, and dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate with the residues of isophthalic and terephthalic acid being especially preferred.
The sulfomonomer may be a dicarboxylic acid or ester thereof containing a sulfonate group, a diol containing a sulfonate group, or a hydroxy acid containing a sulfonate group. Additional examples of concentration ranges for the sulfomonomer residues are about 4 to about 25 mole %, about 4 to about 20 mole %, about 4 to about 15 mole %, and about 4 to about 10 mole %, based on the total repeating units. The cation of the sulfonate salt may be a metal ion such as Li+, Na+, K+, Mg++, Ca++, Ni++, Fe++, and the like. Alternatively, the cation of the sulfonate salt may be non-metallic such as a nitrogenous base as described previously. Examples of sulfomonomer residues which may be used in the process of the present invention are the metal sulfonate salt of sulfophthalic acid, sulfoterephthalic acid, sulfoisophthalic acid, or combinations thereof. Another example of sulfomonomer which may be used is 5-sodiosulfoisophthalic acid or esters thereof. If the sulfomonomer residue is from 5-sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, typical sulfomonomer concentration ranges are about 4 to about 35 mole %, about 8 to about 30 mole %, and about 10 to 25 mole %, based on the total acid residues.
The sulfopolyester includes one or more diol residues which may include aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, and aralkyl glycols. The cycloaliphatic diols, for example, 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, may be present as their pure cis or trans isomers or as a mixture of cis and trans isomers. Non-limiting examples of lower molecular weight polyethylene glycols, e.g., wherein n is from 2 to 6, are diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, and tetraethylene glycol. Of these lower molecular weight glycols, diethylene and triethylene glycol are most preferred. The sulfopolyester may optionally include a branching monomer. Examples of branching monomers are as described hereinabove. Further examples of branching monomer concentration ranges are from 0 to about 20 mole % and from 0 to about 10 mole %. The sulfopolyester of our novel process has a Tg of at least 25° C. Further examples of glass transition temperatures exhibited by the sulfopolyester are at least 30° C., at least 35° C., at least 40° C., at least 50° C., at least 60° C., at least 65° C., at least 80° C., and at least 90° C. Although other Tg's are possible, typical glass transition temperatures of the dry sulfopolyesters our invention are about 30° C., about 48° C., about 55° C., about 65° C., about 70° C., about 75° C., about 85° C., and about 90° C.
The water-dispersible fibers are prepared by a melt blowing process. The polymer is melted in an extruder and forced through a die. The extrudate exiting the die is rapidly attenuated to ultrafine diameters by hot, high velocity air. The orientation, rate of cooling, glass transition temperature (Tg), and rate of crystallization of the fiber are important because they affect the viscosity and processing properties of the polymer during attenuation. The filament is collected on a renewable surface, such as a moving belt, cylindrical drum, rotating mandrel, and so forth. Predrying of pellets (if needed), extruder zone temperature, melt temperature, screw design, throughput rate, air temperature, air flow (velocity), die air gap and set back, nose tip hole size, die temperature, die-to-collector (DCP) distance, quenching environment, collector speed, and post treatments are all factors that influence product characteristics such as filament diameters, basis weight, web thickness, pore size, softness, and shrinkage. The high velocity air also may be used to move the filaments in a somewhat random fashion that results in extensive interlacing. If a moving belt is passed under the die, a nonwoven fabric can be produced by a combination of over-lapping laydown, mechanical cohesiveness, and thermal bonding of the filaments. Overblowing onto another substrate, such as a spunbond or backing layer, is also possible. If the filaments are taken up on an rotating mandrel, a cylindrical product is formed. A water-dispersible fiber lay-down can also be prepared by the spunbond process.
The instant invention, therefore, further provides a process for water-dispersible, nonwoven fabric comprising:
(i) residues of one or more dicarboxylic acids;
(ii) about 4 to about 40 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of at least one sulfomonomer having 2 functional groups and one or more metal sulfonate groups attached to an aromatic or cycloaliphatic ring wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof;
(iii) one or more diol residues wherein at least 20 mole %, based on the total diol residues, is a poly(ethylene glycol) having a structure
H—(OCH2—CH2)n—OH
wherein n is an integer in the range of 2 to about 500;
(iv) 0 to about 25 mole %, based on the total repeating units, of residues of a branching monomer having 3 or more functional groups wherein the functional groups are hydroxyl, carboxyl, or a combination thereof; wherein the sulfopolyester has a glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least 25° C.; wherein the polymer composition contains less than 10 weight percent of a pigment or filler, based on the total weight of the polymer composition;
All pellet samples were predried under vacuum at room temperature for at least 12 hours. The dispersion times shown in Table 3 are for either complete dispersion or dissolution of the nonwoven fabric samples. The abbreviation “CE”, used in Tables 2 and 3 mean “comparative example”.
A sulfopolyester containing 76 mole %, isophthalic acid, 24 mole % of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, 76 mole % diethylene glycol, and 24 mole % 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol with an Ih.V. of 0.29 and a Tg of 48° C. was meltblown through a nominal 6-inch die (30 holes/inch in the nosepiece) onto a cylindrical collector using the conditions shown in Table 1. Interleafing paper was not required. A soft, handleable, flexible web was obtained that did not block during the roll winding operation. Physical properties are provided in Table 2. A small piece (1″×3″) of the nonwoven fabric was easily dispersed in both room temperature (RT) and 50° C. water with slight agitation as shown by data in Table 3.
A sulfopolyester containing 89 mole %, isophthalic acid, 11 mole % of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, 72 mole % diethylene glycol, and 28 mole % ethylene glycol with an Ih.V. of 0.4 and a Tg of 35° C. was meltblown through a 6-inch die using conditions similar to those in Table 1. A soft, handleable, flexible web was obtained that did not block during a roll winding operation. Physical properties are provided in Table 2. A small piece (1″×2″) of the nonwoven fabric was easily and completely dispersed at 50° C. and 80° C.; at RT (23° C.), the fabric required a longer period of time for complete dispersion as shown by the data in Table 3.
It was found that the compositions in Examples 1 and 2 can be overblown onto other nonwoven substrates. It is also possible to condense and wrap shaped or contoured forms that are used instead of conventional web collectors. Thus, it is possible to obtain circular “roving” or plug forms of the webs.
Pellets of a sulfopolyester containing 89 mole %, isophthalic acid, 11 mole % of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, 72 mole % diethylene glycol, and 28 mole % ethylene glycol with an Ih.V. of 0.4 and a Tg of 35° C. were combined with polypropylene (Basell PF 008) pellets in bicomponent ratios (by wt %) of:
The PP had a MFR (melt flow rate) of 800. A melt blowing operation was performed on a line equipped with a 24-inch wide die to yield handleable, soft, flexible, but nonblocking webs with the physical properties provided in Table 2. Small pieces (1″×4″) of nonwoven fabric readily disintegrated as reported in Table 3. None of the fibers, however, were completely water-dispersible because of the insoluble polypropylene component.
A circular piece (4″ diameter) of the nonwoven produced in Example 2 was used as an adhesive layer between two sheets of cotton fabric. A Hannifin melt press was used to fuse the two sheets of cotton together by applying a pressure 35 psig at 200° C. for 30 seconds. The resultant assembly exhibited exceptionally strong bond strength. The cotton substrate shredded before adhesive or bond failure. Similar results have also been obtained with other cellulosics and with PET polyester substrates. Strong bonds were also produced by ultrasonic bonding techniques.
A PP (Exxon 3356G) with a 1200 MFR was melt blown using a 24″ die to yield a flexible nonwoven fabric that did not block and was easily unwound from a roll. Small pieces (1″×4″) did not show any response (i.e., no disintegration or loss in basis weight) to water when immersed in water at RT or 50° C. for 15 minutes.
Unicomponent fibers of a sulfopolyester containing 82 mole % isophthalic acid, 18 mole % of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, 54 mole % diethylene glycol, and 46 mole % 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol with a Tg of 55° C. were melt spun at melt temperatures of 245° C. (473° F.) on a lab staple spinning line. As-spun denier was approximately 8 d/f. Some blocking was encountered on the take-up tubes, but the 10-filament strand readily dissolved within 10-19 seconds in unagitated, demineralized water at 82° C. and a pH between 5 and 6.
Unicomponent fibers obtained from a blend (75:25) of a sulfopolyester containing 82 mole % isophthalic acid, 18 mole % of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, 54 mole % diethylene glycol, and 46 mole % 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol (Tg of 55° C.) and a sulfopolyester containing 91 mole % isophthalic acid, 9 mole % of sodiosulfoisophthalic acid, 25 mole % diethylene glycol, and 75 mole % 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol (Tg of 65° C.), respectively, were melt spun on a lab staple spinning line. The blend has a Tg of 57° C. as calculated by taking a weighted average of the Tg's of the component sulfopolyesters. The 10-filament strands did not show any blocking on the take-up tubes, but readily dissolved within 20-43 seconds in unagitated, demineralized water at 82° C. and a pH between 5 and 6.
The blend described in Example 5 was co-spun with PET to yield bicomponent islands-in-the-sea fibers. A configuration was obtained where the sulfopolyester “sea” is 20 wt % of the fiber containing 80 wt % of PET “islands”. The spun yarn elongation was 190% immediately after spinning. Blocking was not encountered as the yarn was satisfactorily unwound from the bobbins and processed a week after spinning. In a subsequent operation, the “sea” was dissolved by passing the yarn through an 88° C. soft water bath leaving only fine PET filaments.
This prophetic example illustrates the possible application of the multicomponent and microdenier fibers of the present invention to the preparation of specialty papers. The blend described in Example 5 is co-spun with PET to yield bicomponent islands-in-the-sea fibers. The fiber contains approximately 35 wt % sulfopolyester “sea” component and approximately 65 wt % of PET “islands”. The uncrimped fiber is cut to ⅛ inch lengths. In simulated papermaking, these short-cut bicomponent fibers are added to the refining operation. The sulfopolyester “sea” is removed in the agitated, aqueous slurry thereby releasing the microdenier PET fibers into the mix. At comparable weights, the microdenier PET fibers (“islands”) are more effective to increase paper tensile strength than the addition of coarse PET fibers.
Bicomponent fibers were made having a 108 islands in the sea structure on a spunbond line using a 24″ wide bicomponent spinneret die from Hills Inc., Melbourne, Fla., having a total of 2222 die holes in the die plate. Two extruders were connected to melt pumps which were in turn connected to the inlets for both components in the fiber spin die. The primary extruder (A) was connected to the inlet which metered a flow of Eastman F61HC PET polyester to form the island domains in the islands in the sea fiber cross-section structure. The extrusion zones were set to melt the PET entering the die at a temperature of 285° C. The secondary extruder (B) processed Eastman AQ 55S sulfopolyester polymer from Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, Tenn. having an inherent viscosity of about 0.35 and a melt viscosity of about 15,000 poise, measured at 240° C. and 1 rad/sec sheer rate and 9,700 poise measured at 240° C. and 100 rad/sec sheer rate in a Rheometric Dynamic Analyzer RDAII (Rheometrics Inc. Piscataway, N.J.) rheometer. Prior to performing a melt viscosity measurement, the sample was dried for two days in a vacuum oven at 60° C. The viscosity test was performed using a 25 mm diameter parallel-plate geometry at 1 mm gap setting. A dynamic frequency sweep was run at a strain rate range of 1 to 400 rad/sec and 10% strain amplitude. Then, the viscosity was measured at 240° C. and strain rate of 1 rad/sec. This procedure was followed in determining the viscosity of the sulfopolyester materials used in the subsequent examples. The secondary extruder was set to melt and feed the AQ 55S polymer at a melt temperature of 255° C. to the spinnerette die. The two polymers were formed into bicomponent extrudates by extrusion at a throughput rate of 0.6 g/hole/min. The volume ratio of PET to AQ 55S in the bicomponent extrudates was adjusted to yield 60/40 and 70/30 ratios.
An aspirator device was used to melt draw the bicomponent extrudates to produce the bicomponent fibers. The flow of air through the aspirator chamber pulled the resultant fibers down. The amount of air flowing downward through the aspirator assembly was controlled by the pressure of the air entering the aspirator. In this example, the maximum pressure of the air used in the aspirator to melt draw the bicomponent extrudates was 25 psi. Above this value, the airflow through the aspirator caused the extrudates to break during this melt draw spinning process as the melt draw rate imposed on the bicomponent extrudates was greater than the inherent ductility of the bicomponent extrudates. The bicomponent fibers were laid down into a non-woven web having a fabric weight of 95 grams per square meter (gsm). Evaluation of the bicomponent fibers in this nonwoven web by optical microscopy showed that the PET was present as islands in the center of the fiber structure, but the PET islands around the outer periphery of the bicomponent fiber nearly coalesced together to form a nearly continuous ring of PET polymer around the circumference of the fibers which is not desirable. Microscopy found that the diameter of the bicomponent fibers in the nonwoven web was generally between 15-19 microns, corresponding to an average fiber as-spun denier of about 2.5 denier per filament (dpf). This represents a melt drawn fiber speed of about 2160 meters per minute. As-spun denier is defined as the denier of the fiber (weight in grams of 9000 meters length of fiber) obtained by the melt extrusion and melt drawing steps. The variation in bicomponent fiber diameter indicated non-uniformity in spun-drawing of the fibers.
The non-woven web samples were conditioned in a forced-air oven for five minutes at 120° C. The heat treated web exhibited significant shrinkage with the area of the nonwoven web being decreased to only about 12% of the initial area of the web before heating. Although not intending to be bound by theory, due to the high molecular weight and melt viscosity of the AQ 55S sulfopolyester used in the fiber, the bicomponent extrudates could not be melt drawn to the degree required to cause strain induced crystallization of the PET segments in the fibers. Overall, the AQ 55S sulfopolyester having this specific inherent viscosity and melt viscosity was not acceptable as the bicomponent extrudates could not be uniformly melt drawn to the desired fine denier.
A sulfopolyester polymer with the same chemical composition as commercial Eastman AQ55S polymer was produced, however, the molecular weight was controlled to a lower value characterized by an inherent viscosity of about 0.25. The melt viscosity of this polymer was 3300 poise measured at 240° C. and 1 rad/sec shear rate.
Bicomponent extrudates having a 16-segment segmented pie structure were made using a bicomponent spinneret die from Hills Inc., Melbourne, Fla., having a total of 2222 die holes in the 24 inch wide die plate on a spunbond equipment. Two extruders were used to melt and feed two polymers to this spinnerette die. The primary extruder (A) was connected to the inlet which fed Eastman F61HC PET polyester melt to form the domains or segment slices in the segmented pie cross-section structure. The extrusion zones were set to melt the PET entering the spinnerette die at a temperature of 285° C. The secondary extruder (B) melted and fed the sulfopolyester polymer of Example 8. The secondary extruder was set to extrude the sulfopolyester polymer at a melt temperature of 255° C. into the spinnerette die. Except for the spinnerette die used and melt viscosity of the sulfopolyester polymer, the procedure employed in this example was the same as in Comparative Example 8. The melt throughput per hole was 0.6 gm/min. The volume ratio of PET to sulfopolyester in the bicomponent extrudates was set at 70/30 which represents a weight ratio of about 70/30.
The bicomponent extrudates were melt drawn using the same aspirator used in Comparative Example 8 to produce the bicomponent fibers. Initially, the input air to the aspirator was set to 25 psi and the fibers had as-spun denier of about 2.0 with the bicomponent fibers exhibiting a uniform diameter profile of about 14-15 microns. The air to the aspirator was increased to a maximum available pressure of 45 psi without breaking the melt extrudates during melt drawing. Using 45 psi air, the bicomponent extrudates were melt drawn down to a fiber as-spun denier of about 1.2 with the bicomponent fibers exhibiting a diameter of 11-12 microns when viewed under a microscope. The speed during the melt draw process was calculated to be about 4500 m/min. Although not intending to be bound by theory, at melt draw rates approaching this speed, it is believed that strain induced crystallization of the PET during the melt drawing process begins to occur. As noted above, it is desirable to form some oriented crystallinity in the PET fiber segments during the fiber melt draw process so that the nonwoven web will be more dimensionally stable during subsequent processing.
The bicomponent fibers using 45 psi aspirator air pressure were laid down into a nonwoven web with a weight of 140 grams per square meter (gsm). The shrinkage of the nonwoven web was measured by conditioning the material in a forced-air oven for five minutes at 120° C. This example represents a significant reduction in shrinkage compared to the fibers and fabric of Comparative Example 8.
This nonwoven web having 140 gsm fabric weight was soaked for five minutes in a static deionized water bath at various temperatures. The soaked nonwoven web was dried, and the percent weight loss due to soaking in deionized water at the various temperatures was measured as shown in Table 4.
The sulfopolyester dissipated very readily into deionized water at a temperature of about 25° C. Removal of the sulfopolyester from the bicomponent fibers in the nonwoven web is indicated by the % weight loss. Extensive or complete removal of the sulfopolyester from the bicomponent fibers were observed at temperatures at or above 33° C. If hydroentanglement is used to produce a nonwoven web of these bicomponent fibers comprising the present sulfopolyester polymer of Example 8, it would be expected that the sulfopolyester polymer would be extensively or completely removed by the hydroentangling water jets if the water temperature was above ambient. If it is desired that very little sulfopolyester polymer be removed from these bicomponent fibers during the hydroentanglement step, low water temperature, less than about 25° C., should be used.
A sulfopolyester polymer was prepared with the following diacid and diol composition: diacid composition (71 mol % terephthalic acid, 20 mol % isophthalic acid, and 9 mol % 5-(sodiosulfo) isophthalic acid) and diol composition (60 mol % ethylene glycol and 40 mol % diethylene glycol). The sulfopolyester was prepared by high temperature polyesterification under vacuum. The esterification conditions were controlled to produce a sulfopolyester having an inherent viscosity of about 0.31. The melt viscosity of this sulfopolyester was measured to be in the range of about 3000-4000 poise at 240° C. and 1 rad/sec shear rate.
The sulfopolyester polymer of Example 10 was spun into bicomponent segmented pie fibers and nonwoven web according to the same procedure described in Example 9. The primary extruder (A) fed Eastman F61HC PET polyester melt to form the larger segment slices in the segmented pie structure. The extrusion zones were set to melt the PET entering the spinnerette die at a temperature of 285° C. The secondary extruder (B) processed the sulfopolyester polymer of Example 10 which was fed at a melt temperature of 255° C. into the spinnerette die. The melt throughput rate per hole was 0.6 gm/min. The volume ratio of PET to sulfopolyester in the bicomponent extrudates was set at 70/30 which represents the weight ratio of about 70/30. The cross-section of the bicomponent extrudates had wedge shaped domains of PET with sulfopolyester polymer separating these domains.
The bicomponent extrudates were melt drawn using the same aspirator assembly used in Comparative Example 8 to produce the bicomponent fiber. The maximum available pressure of the air to the aspirator without breaking the bicomponent fibers during drawing was 45 psi. Using 45 psi air, the bicomponent extrudates were melt drawn down to bicomponent fibers with as-spun denier of about 1.2 with the bicomponent fibers exhibiting a diameter of about 11-12 microns when viewed under a microscope. The speed during the melt drawing process was calculated to be about 4500 m/min.
The bicomponent fibers were laid down into nonwoven webs having weights of 140 gsm and 110 gsm. The shrinkage of the webs was measured by conditioning the material in a forced-air oven for five minutes at 120° C. The area of the nonwoven webs after shrinkage was about 29% of the webs' starting areas.
Microscopic examination of the cross section of the melt drawn fibers and fibers taken from the nonwoven web displayed a very good segmented pie structure where the individual segments were clearly defined and exhibited similar size and shape. The PET segments were completely separated from each other so that they would form eight separate PET monocomponent fibers having a pie-slice shape after removal of the sulfopolyester from the bicomponent fiber.
The nonwoven web, having 110 gsm fabric weight, was soaked for eight minutes in a static deionized water bath at various temperatures. The soaked nonwoven web was dried and the percent weight loss due to soaking in deionized water at the various temperatures was measured as shown in Table 5.
The sulfopolyester polymer dissipated very readily into deionized water at temperatures above about 46° C., with the removal of the sulfopolyester polymer from the fibers being very extensive or complete at temperatures above 51° C. as shown by the weight loss. A weight loss of about 30% represented complete removal of the sulfopolyester from the bicomponent fibers in the nonwoven web. If hydroentanglement is used to process this non-woven web of bicomponent fibers comprising this sulfopolyester, it would be expected that the polymer would not be extensively removed by the hydroentangling water jets at water temperatures below 40° C.
The nonwoven webs of Example 11 having basis weights of both 140 gsm and 110 gsm were hydroentangled using a hydroentangling apparatus manufactured by Fleissner, GmbH, Egelsbach, Germany. The machine had five total hydroentangling stations wherein three sets of jets contacted the top side of the nonwoven web and two sets of jets contacted the opposite side of the nonwoven web. The water jets comprised a series of fine orifices about 100 microns in diameter machined in two-feet wide jet strips. The water pressure to the jets was set at 60 bar (Jet Strip # 1), 190 bar (Jet Strips # 2 and 3), and 230 bar (Jet Strips # 4 and 5). During the hydroentanglement process, the temperature of the water to the jets was found to be in the range of about 40-45° C. The nonwoven fabric exiting the hydroentangling unit was strongly tied together. The continuous fibers were knotted together to produce a hydroentangled nonwoven fabric with high resistance to tearing when stretched in both directions.
Next, the hydroentangled nonwoven fabric was fastened onto a tenter frame comprising a rigid rectangular frame with a series of pins around the periphery thereof. The fabric was fastened to the pins to restrain the fabric from shrinking as it was heated. The frame with the fabric sample was placed in a forced-air oven for three minutes at 130° C. to cause the fabric to heat set while being restrained. After heat setting, the conditioned fabric was cut into a sample specimen of measured size, and the specimen was conditioned at 130° C. without restraint by a tenter frame. The dimensions of the hydroentangled nonwoven fabric after this conditioning were measured and only minimal shrinkage (<0.5% reduction in dimension) was observed. It was apparent that heat setting of the hydroentangled nonwoven fabric was sufficient to produce a dimensionally stable nonwoven fabric.
The hydroentangled nonwoven fabric, after being heat set as described above, was washed in 90° C. deionized water to remove the sulfopolyester polymer and leave the PET monocomponent fiber segments remaining in the hydroentangled fabric. After repeated washings, the dried fabric exhibited a weight loss of approximately 26%. Washing the nonwoven web before hydroentangling demonstrated a weight loss of 31.3%. Therefore, the hydroentangling process removed some of the sulfopolyester from the nonwoven web, but this amount was relatively small. In order to lessen the amount of sulfopolyester removed during hydroentanglement, the water temperature of the hydroentanglement jets should be lowered to below 40° C.
The sulfopolyester of Example 10 was found to give segmented pie fibers having good segment distribution where the water non-dispersable polymer segments formed individual fibers of similar size and shape after removal of the sulfopolyester polymer. The rheology of the sulfopolyester was suitable to allow the bicomponent extrudates to be melt drawn at high rates to achieve fine denier bicomponent fibers with as-spun denier as low as about 1.0. These bicomponent fibers are capable of being laid down into a non-woven web which could be hydroentangled without experiencing significant loss of sulfopolyester polymer to produce the nonwoven fabric. The nonwoven fabric produced by hydroentangling the non-woven web exhibited high strength and could be heat set at temperatures of about 120° C. or higher to produce nonwoven fabric with excellent dimensional stability. The sulfopolyester polymer was removed from the hydroentangled nonwoven fabric in a washing step. This resulted in a strong nonwoven fabric product with lighter fabric weight and much greater flexibility and softer hand. The monocomponent PET fibers in this nonwoven fabric product were wedge shaped and exhibited an average denier of about 0.1.
A sulfopolyester polymer was prepared with the following diacid and diol composition: diacid composition (69 mol % terephthalic acid, 22.5 mol % isophthalic acid, and 8.5 mol % 5-(sodiosulfo)isophthalic acid) and diol composition (65 mol % ethylene glycol and 35 mol % diethylene glycol). The sulfopolyester was prepared by high temperature polyesterification under vacuum. The esterification conditions were controlled to produce a sulfopolyester having an inherent viscosity of about 0.33. The melt viscosity of this sulfopolyester was measured to be in the range of about 3000-4000 poise at 240° C. and 1 rad/sec shear rate.
The sulfopolyester polymer of Example 13 was spun into bicomponent islands-in-sea cross-section configuration with 16 islands on a spunbond line. The primary extruder (A) fed Eastman F61HC PET polyester melt to form the islands in the islands-in-sea structure. The extrusion zones were set to melt the PET entering the spinnerette die at a temperature of about 290° C. The secondary extruder (B) processed the sulfopolyester polymer of Example 13 which was fed at a melt temperature of about 260° C. into the spinnerette die. The volume ratio of PET to sulfopolyester in the bicomponent extrudates was set at 70/30 which represents the weight ratio of about 70/30. The melt throughput rate through the spinneret was 0.6 g/hole/minute. The cross-section of the bicomponent extrudates had round shaped island domains of PET with sulfopolyester polymer separating these domains.
The bicomponent extrudates were melt drawn using an aspirator assembly. The maximum available pressure of the air to the aspirator without breaking the bicomponent fibers during melt drawing was 50 psi. Using 50 psi air, the bicomponent extrudates were melt drawn down to bicomponent fibers with as-spun denier of about 1.4 with the bicomponent fibers exhibiting a diameter of about 12 microns when viewed under a microscope. The speed during the drawing process was calculated to be about 3900 m/min.
This application is a continuation application claiming priority to continuation-in-part application Ser. No. 11/344,320, filed on Jan. 31, 2006, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,892,993, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/204,868, filed Aug. 16, 2005, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,902,094, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/850,548, filed May 20, 2004, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,989,193, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/465,698, filed Jun. 19, 2003, now abandoned. The foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference to the extent that they do not contradict the statements herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1814155 | Haughey | Jul 1931 | A |
| 2862251 | Kalwaites | Dec 1958 | A |
| 2999788 | Morgan | Sep 1961 | A |
| 3018272 | Griffing et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3033822 | Kibler et al. | May 1962 | A |
| 3049469 | Davison et al. | Aug 1962 | A |
| 3075952 | Coover et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3372084 | Arledter | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3485706 | Evans | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3528947 | Lappin et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3556932 | Coscia et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3592796 | Trapasso et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3772076 | Keim | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3779993 | Kibler et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3783093 | Gallacher et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3803210 | Rod et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3833457 | Misumi et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3846507 | Thomm et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3998740 | Bost et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4008344 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4073777 | O'Neill et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4073988 | Nishida et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4100324 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4104262 | Schade | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4121966 | Amano et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4127696 | Okamoto | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4137393 | Sidebotham et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4145469 | Newkirk et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4226672 | Absolon et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4233355 | Sato et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4234652 | Vanoni et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4239720 | Gerlach et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4240918 | Lagasse et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4243480 | Hernandez et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4288503 | Goldberg | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4288508 | Goldberg | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4297412 | Achard et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4299654 | Tlach et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4302495 | Marra | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4304901 | O'Neill et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4342801 | Gerlach et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4350006 | Okamoto et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4365041 | Okamoto et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4381335 | Okamoto | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4410579 | Johns | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4427557 | Stockburger | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4460649 | Park et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4480085 | Larson | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4496619 | Okamoto | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4517715 | Yoshida et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4569343 | Kimura et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4618524 | Groitzsch et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4647497 | Weeks | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4652341 | Prior | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4699845 | Oikawa et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4738785 | Langston et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4755421 | Manning et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4795668 | Krueger et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4804719 | Weaver et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4810775 | Bendix et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4863785 | Berman et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4873273 | Allan et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4910292 | Blount | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4921899 | Phan et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4940744 | Tortorici et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4943477 | Kanamura et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4946932 | Jenkins | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4966808 | Kawano | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4973656 | Blount | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4990593 | Blount | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4996252 | Phan et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5006598 | Adams et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5039339 | Phan et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5057368 | Largman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5069970 | Largman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5073436 | Antonacci et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5108820 | Kaneko et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5124194 | Kawano | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5158844 | Hagens et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5162074 | Hills | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5162399 | Sharma et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5171767 | Buckley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176952 | Joseph et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5218042 | Kuo et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5242640 | Butler et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5254399 | Oku et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5258220 | Joseph | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5262460 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5274025 | Stockl et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5277976 | Hogle et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5281306 | Kakiuchi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286843 | Wood | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290626 | Nishioi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5290631 | Fleury et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5290654 | Sacripante et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5292075 | Bartlett | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5292581 | Viazmensky et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5292855 | Krutak et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5296286 | Allen et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5308697 | Muramoto et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5336552 | Strack et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5338406 | Smith | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342863 | Buckley et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5366804 | Dugan | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368928 | Okamura et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5369210 | George et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5369211 | George et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374357 | Comstock et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5375306 | Roussin-Moynier | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5378757 | Blount, Jr. et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5382400 | Pike et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5386003 | Greene et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5389068 | Keck | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5395693 | Cho et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405698 | Dugan | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5416156 | Kamen | May 1995 | A |
| 5423432 | Krutak et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5431994 | Kozulla | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5446079 | Buchanan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5449464 | El-Shall | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5456982 | Hansen et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466410 | Hills | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5466518 | Isaac et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5468536 | Whitcomb et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5472600 | Ellefson et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5482772 | Strack et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486418 | Ohmory et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5496627 | Bagrodia et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5498468 | Blaney | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5502091 | Dasgupta | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5508101 | Patnode et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509913 | Yeo | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5525282 | Dugan | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530059 | Blount, Jr. et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5536811 | Wood | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5543488 | Miller et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545481 | Harrington | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5552495 | Miller et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559171 | Buchanan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559205 | Hansen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5567510 | Patnode et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571620 | George et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575918 | Virnig et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5580911 | Buchanan et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593778 | Kondo et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5593807 | Sacripante et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5599858 | Buchanan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5605746 | Groeger et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607491 | Jackson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5607765 | Hansen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5620785 | Watt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5630972 | Patnode et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5635071 | Al-Samadi | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5637385 | Mizuki et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5643662 | Yeo et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646237 | George et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652048 | Haynes et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5654086 | Nishijima et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5658704 | Patel et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5660965 | Mychajlowskij et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5672415 | Sawyer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5688582 | Nagaoka et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5698331 | Matsumura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5709940 | George et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5736083 | Dugan | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5750605 | Blumenthal et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5753351 | Yoshida et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5759926 | Pike et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5762758 | Hoffman | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5763065 | Patnode et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779736 | Frederick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5783503 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5785725 | Cusick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5798078 | Myers | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5817740 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5820982 | Salsman | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837658 | Stork | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843311 | Richter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853701 | George et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853944 | Foucher et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5871845 | Dahringer et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5883181 | Cicchiello et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888916 | Tadokoro et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5895710 | Sasse et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5916678 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916687 | Takanashi et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916725 | Patel et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916935 | Wiggins et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5935880 | Wang et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935883 | Pike | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935884 | Williams et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948710 | Pomplun et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5952251 | Jackson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954967 | Egraz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970583 | Groten et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976694 | Tsai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993668 | Duan | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993834 | Shah et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6004673 | Nishijima | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007910 | Miller et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6020420 | George | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6037055 | Aneja et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6057388 | Wiggins et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6080471 | Shigematsu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6090731 | Pike et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6110249 | Duane et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110588 | Perez et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110636 | Foucher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114407 | Myers | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120889 | Turner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6121170 | Tsai et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6162340 | Zakikhani | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162890 | George et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168719 | Shimokawa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171685 | George et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174602 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177193 | Tsai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177607 | Blaney et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183648 | Kozak et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200669 | Marmon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211309 | McIntosh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6218321 | Lorcks et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6225243 | Austin | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235392 | Luo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6248809 | Buckley et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6294645 | Allen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6296933 | Goda et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6300306 | Firkins et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6316592 | Bates et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322887 | Matsui et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6331606 | Sun | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332994 | Karageorgiou | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335092 | Takeda et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6348679 | Ryan et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6352948 | Pike et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6355137 | Staib | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6361784 | Brennan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6365697 | Kim et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6369136 | Sorriero et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6381817 | Moody, III | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6384108 | Breton et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402870 | Groten et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6403677 | Walker | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6417251 | Brady | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420024 | Perez et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420027 | Kimura et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6428900 | Wang | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6429253 | Guerro et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6430348 | Asano et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6432532 | Perez et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6432850 | Susumu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436855 | Iwata et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440556 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6441267 | Dugan | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6471910 | Haggard | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6488731 | Schultheiss et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6506853 | Duan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6509092 | Dugan | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6512024 | Lundgard et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6533938 | Dillorio et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6541175 | Jiang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6548592 | Lang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6550622 | Koslow | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6551353 | Baker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6552123 | Katayama et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6552162 | Wang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6554881 | Healey | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6573204 | Philipp et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6576716 | Wo | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579466 | David et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6583075 | Dugan | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6586529 | Mumick et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6589426 | Husain et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6602955 | Soerens et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| H2086 | Amsler | Oct 2003 | H |
| 6638677 | Patel et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6657017 | Wo et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6664437 | Sawyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6692825 | Qin et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6706652 | Groten et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6720063 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6730387 | Rezai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6743506 | Bond et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6746766 | Bond et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6746779 | Hayes et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6759124 | Royer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6764802 | Maric et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6767498 | Talley, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6776858 | Bansal et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6780560 | Farrugia et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6780942 | Leon et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6787245 | Hayes | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6787425 | Rotondaro et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6815382 | Groten et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6838172 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6838403 | Tsai et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6841038 | Horenziak et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6844062 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6844063 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6849329 | Perez et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6855422 | Magill et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6860906 | Malisz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6861142 | Wilkie et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6890649 | Hobbs et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6893711 | Williamson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6900148 | Yoneda et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6902796 | Morell et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6946506 | Bond et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6949288 | Hodge et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953622 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6989193 | Haile et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6989194 | Bansal et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7008485 | Heikkila et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7011653 | Imsangjan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7011885 | Chang et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7014803 | Perez et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7022201 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7025885 | Cote et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7026033 | Fujimori et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7070695 | Husain et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7087301 | Musgrave et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7091140 | Ferencz et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7097904 | Ochi et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7144614 | Nakajima et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7160612 | Magill et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7163744 | Nightingale et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166225 | Pitt et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7179376 | Kaleem et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7186343 | Rabie et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7186344 | Hughes | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7193029 | Hayes | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194788 | Clark et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7195814 | Ista et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7214765 | Ringeisen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7220815 | Hayes | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7238415 | Rodriguez et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7238423 | Calhoun et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7241497 | Magill et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7276139 | Katai et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7285209 | Yu et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7291270 | Gibson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7291389 | Bitler et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7304125 | Ibar | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7306735 | Baggott et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7309372 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7314497 | Kahlbaugh et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7329723 | Jernigan et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7338664 | Tseng et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7344775 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7347947 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7357985 | Kurian et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7358022 | Farrugia et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7358323 | Maeda et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7358325 | Hayes | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7361700 | Sunamori et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7365118 | McCleskey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7371701 | Inagaki | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7387976 | Baba et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7388058 | Kaku et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7405171 | Tsujiyama et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7405266 | Bentley et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7432219 | Strandqvist et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7442277 | Kupper et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7462386 | Yamasaki et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7497895 | Sabottke | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7513004 | Luckman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7560159 | Goda et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7576019 | Bond et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7588688 | Butters et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7622188 | Kamiyama et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7655070 | Dallas et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7666500 | Magill et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7666502 | Magill et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7666504 | Ochi et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7674510 | Kamiya | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7687143 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7695812 | Peng et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7696111 | Mangold et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7704595 | Morin | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7718104 | MacDonald et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7727627 | Sen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7732557 | Phelps et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7736737 | Van Dun et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7737060 | Strickler et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7744807 | Berrigan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7754123 | Verdegan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7757811 | Fox et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765647 | Smith et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7772456 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7820568 | Horiguchi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7837814 | Minami et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7858732 | Bruchmann et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7883604 | Dyer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7884037 | Sirovatka et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7887526 | Van Gompel et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7892672 | Nishikawa | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7892992 | Kamada et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7892993 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7896940 | Sundet et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7897078 | Petersen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7897248 | Barrera et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7902094 | Haile et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7902096 | Brandner et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7910207 | Kamiyama et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7914866 | Shannon et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7918313 | Gross et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7919419 | Hurley et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7922959 | Jones et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7923143 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7928025 | Shipley et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7931457 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7932192 | Fujisawa et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7935645 | Pourdeyhimi et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7947142 | Fox et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7947864 | Damay et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7951313 | Matsubayashi et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7951452 | Nakayama et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7959848 | Reneker et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8021457 | Dema et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8057567 | Webb et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8129019 | Pourdeyhimi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8148278 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8158244 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8163385 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8178199 | Gupta et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8216953 | Haile et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8227362 | Haile et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8236713 | Haile et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8247335 | Haile et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8257628 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8262958 | Haile et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8273451 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8277706 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8314041 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8388877 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8398907 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8435908 | Haile et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8444895 | Haile et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8444896 | Haile et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8512519 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8513147 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8557374 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 20020009590 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030016 | Schmidt | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020079121 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020106510 | Deguchi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123290 | Tsai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020127937 | Lange et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020127939 | Hwo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020146552 | Mumick et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187329 | Ista et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030026986 | Matsui et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030057155 | Husain et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030077444 | Bond et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091822 | Bond et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030092343 | Bond et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104204 | Bond et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111763 | Jen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166370 | Harris et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166371 | Fingal et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168191 | Hansen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176132 | Moriyasu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030194558 | Anderson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196955 | Hughes | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040054331 | Hamilton et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081829 | Klier et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157037 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194558 | Nagase | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209058 | Chou et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211729 | Sunkara et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040214495 | Foss et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242106 | Rabasco et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242838 | Duan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258910 | Haile et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260034 | Haile et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050026527 | Schmidt | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027098 | Hayes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050032450 | Haggard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079781 | Tsujimoto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050115902 | Kaleem et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125908 | Pourdeyhimi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148261 | Close et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171250 | Hayes | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208300 | Magill et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215157 | Dugan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221709 | Jordan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222956 | Bristow et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050227068 | Dugan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239359 | Jones et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050282008 | Haile et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050287895 | Bansal | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060011544 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019570 | Groten et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021938 | Diallo | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030230 | Nagaoka et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060035556 | Yokoi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060049386 | Kody et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051575 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057350 | Ochi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057373 | Inagaki et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060060529 | Cote et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060065600 | Sunkara et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060081330 | Minami et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083917 | Dugan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093814 | Chang | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093819 | Atwood et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060113033 | Bruner | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060128247 | Skoog et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135020 | Weinberg et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147709 | Mizumura et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155094 | Meckel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159918 | Dugan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177656 | Kolmes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189956 | Catalan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060194027 | Pourdeyhimi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060194047 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204753 | Simmonds et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210797 | Masuda et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230731 | Kalayci et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234049 | Van Dun et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234050 | Frankel | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234587 | Horiguchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060263601 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281383 | Schmitt et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070009736 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070020453 | Sen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021021 | Verdegan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070031637 | Anderson | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070031668 | Hietpas et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070039889 | Ashford | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070048523 | Pollet et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070056906 | Kaleem et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070062872 | Parker et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074628 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070077427 | Dugan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070098982 | Nishida et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070102361 | Kiefer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070110980 | Shah | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070110998 | Steele et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070114177 | Sabottke | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070122613 | Stevens et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070122614 | Peng et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070128404 | Tung et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167096 | Scott | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179275 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182040 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070190319 | Kalayci | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070232179 | Polat et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070232180 | Polat et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243377 | Nishida et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070254153 | Nadkarni et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258935 | McEntire et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259029 | McEntire et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259177 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070264520 | Wood et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070278151 | Musale | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070278152 | Musale | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080000836 | Wang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080003400 | Tseng | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080003905 | Tseng et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080003912 | Pourdeyhimi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080009574 | Huenefeld et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080009650 | Sluijmers et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080011680 | Partridge et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038974 | Eagles | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039540 | Reitz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080064285 | Morton et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134652 | Lim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160278 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160856 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160859 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080170982 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188151 | Yokoi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207833 | Bear et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207883 | Bear et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080229672 | Woo et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080233850 | Woo et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080245037 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080264586 | Likitalo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080287026 | Chakravarty et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311815 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090025895 | Cowman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036015 | Nhan et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042475 | Pourdeyhimi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090163449 | Wempe | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090249956 | Chi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090258182 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090274862 | Nakayama et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090294435 | Nhan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090305592 | Shi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100018660 | Varnell | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100035500 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100072126 | Tsujimoto et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100112325 | Iwamoto et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100133173 | Inagaki | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100133197 | Langner | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136312 | Inagaki | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100143717 | Sakamoto et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100173154 | Shimotsu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100180558 | Ito et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100187712 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197027 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100200512 | Chase et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203788 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100247894 | Beard | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272938 | Mitchell et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100273947 | Miyauchi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100282682 | Eaton et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100285101 | Moore et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100291213 | Berrigan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100310921 | Hayakawa et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110020590 | Yoneda et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110030885 | Anneaux et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110033705 | Komura et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110036487 | Rajala et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110039055 | Fujisawa et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110039468 | Baldwin, Jr. et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040277 | Rajala et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110041471 | Sebastian et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110045042 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110045231 | Kajiwara et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110045261 | Sellars | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046461 | McKenna | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110049769 | Duchoslav et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054429 | Lademann et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110056638 | Rosset | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110059669 | He et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110064928 | Bonneh | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110065573 | McEneany et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110065871 | Nagano et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110067369 | Chung et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110068507 | Warren et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110074060 | Angadjivand et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110076250 | Belenkaya et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110084028 | Stanfel et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110091761 | Miller et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110094515 | Duffy | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110104493 | Barnholtz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110114274 | Takano et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110117176 | Klun et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110117353 | Henshaw et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110117439 | Yamada et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110123584 | Seidling et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110124769 | Moen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110124835 | DeWeijer et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110129510 | Liebmann et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110130063 | Matsubayashi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142900 | Ohta et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110143110 | Tsuchiya et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110147299 | Stanfel et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110171535 | Ohinshi et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110171890 | Nakayama et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20120015577 | Rudman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1290517 | Oct 1991 | CA |
| 0340763 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 0 396 771 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0610894 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| 0610897 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| 0 618 317 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 0830466 | Mar 1998 | EP |
| 0836656 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0859073 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0880909 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0 666 344 | Sep 1999 | EP |
| 1161576 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1 243 675 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 0 645 480 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 0 961 847 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1359632 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 0 935 682 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 1 416 077 | May 2004 | EP |
| 0 905 292 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1538686 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 1 550 746 | Jul 2005 | EP |
| 1 322 802 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1 314 808 | Jan 2006 | EP |
| 1252219 | Aug 2006 | EP |
| 1 325 184 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 1 715 089 | Oct 2006 | EP |
| 1 319 095 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1 731 634 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 1 149 195 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 1 412 567 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 1 404 905 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 0 842 310 | Jan 2008 | EP |
| 1 894 609 | Mar 2008 | EP |
| 1 938 883 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 2082082 | Jul 2009 | EP |
| 1 516 079 | Dec 2009 | EP |
| 2 135 984 | Dec 2009 | EP |
| 1 224 900 | Jun 2010 | EP |
| 2 243 872 | Oct 2010 | EP |
| 2283796 | Feb 2011 | EP |
| 2287374 | Feb 2011 | EP |
| 1 620 506 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 0847263 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2292309 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 1474555 | Apr 2011 | EP |
| 2308579 | Apr 2011 | EP |
| 2311542 | Apr 2011 | EP |
| 2311543 | Apr 2011 | EP |
| 2654674 | May 1991 | FR |
| 1073640 | Jun 1967 | GB |
| 52-066719 | Jun 1977 | JP |
| 58-83046 | May 1983 | JP |
| 58174625 | Oct 1983 | JP |
| 58-220818 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| 61-047822 | Mar 1986 | JP |
| 61-296120 | Dec 1986 | JP |
| 62-078213 | Apr 1987 | JP |
| 63-159523 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| S63-227898 | Sep 1988 | JP |
| 1162825 | Jun 1989 | JP |
| 1-272820 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| 1-289838 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 1-289838 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 02-026920 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| 2-210092 | Aug 1990 | JP |
| 3-16378 | Mar 1991 | JP |
| 3-180587 | Aug 1991 | JP |
| 04-057918 | Feb 1992 | JP |
| 04327209 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| 4327209 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| 5-18334 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 05-263316 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 1993-263316 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 5321106 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 6-002221 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| 9-77963 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| 9-100397 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| 9-249742 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 09-310230 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 2000-95850 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 3131100 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001-123335 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2004137418 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2005-002510 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005-154450 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2006233365 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2007-092235 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2007092235 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2010255173 | Nov 2010 | JP |
| 4648815 | Mar 2011 | JP |
| 2001-0044145 | Jun 2001 | KR |
| 230212 | Apr 2005 | TW |
| WO 9307197 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO 9424218 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO 9503172 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO 9947621 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 9948668 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 0166666 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 02060497 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 03069038 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004067818 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004099314 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004113598 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005066403 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005103354 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005103357 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006001739 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006052732 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006098851 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006107695 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007089423 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007112443 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008028134 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008085332 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009024836 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009051283 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009076401 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009088564 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009140381 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009152349 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010114820 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010117612 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010125239 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010146240 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011015709 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011008481 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011028661 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011034523 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011049831 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011049927 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011054932 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011062761 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011063372 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011066224 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011070233 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011104427 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011157892 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action with Mail Date of Jan. 25, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/343,955. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 4, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/001082. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,868, filed Aug. 16, 2005, William Alston Haile, et al.; now published as U.S. 2005-0282008 referenced above. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/343,955, filed Jan. 31, 2006, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.; now published as 2007-0179275 referenced above. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320, filed, Jan. 31, 2006, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.; now published as U.S. 2006-0194047 referenced above. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,953, filed Jan. 3, 2007, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al.; now published as U.S. 2008-0160859 referenced above. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 08/550,042, filed Oct. 30, 1995, Michael C. Cook. |
| Office Action with Mail Date of Oct. 10, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/343,955. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Nov. 6, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/025661. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 26, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/001083. |
| Office Action with Mail Date of Mar. 30, 2009 for related US Patent Application No. 11/204,868. |
| Office Action with Mail Date of Mar. 26, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320. |
| Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed Mar. 9, 2009; for U.S. Appl. No. 11/343,955. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/172,257, filed Apr. 24, 2009, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Lyondall Filtration and Separation; “Nonwoven Liquid Filtration Media Construction and Performance”; Accessed from the web: http://www.lydallfiltation.com/tech/documents/Nonwovenliquidfiltration.pdf. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/001717. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 9, 2009 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,955. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2009 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,868. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2010 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2010 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,868. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2010 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,953. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,548. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 8, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,548. |
| DIN STD 54900 (in German, no English translation available). |
| ASTM D6340-98. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 7, 2005 for International Application No. PCT/US2004/018682. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,461, filed Apr. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Smook, G.A., “Handbook for Pulp and Paper Technologist”, Angus Wilde Publications, 2nd Ed., 1992, pp. 194-195, 211-212. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 7, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/343,955. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Dec. 30, 2009 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/025770. |
| Ke Qinfei, et al., “Non-woven Science”, Donghau University Press, 2004.9, Catalog, P. 115-132 (unavailable). |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/343,955. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,955. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,320. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 14, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/204,868. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/909,574, filed Oct. 21, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,494, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,518, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521, filed Dec. 13, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,450, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,452, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,459, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487, filed Dec. 22, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,950, filed Dec. 30, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960, filed Dec. 30, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,982, filed Dec. 30, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,001, filed Dec. 30, 2010, William Alston Haile, et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,615, filed on Mar. 22, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 4, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,953. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,001. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,459. |
| USPTO Office Action dated May 27, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,452. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jun 23, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443. |
| Coons, R., “Eastman Chemical Core Focus Delivers Value,” Chemical Week, Aug. 15/22, 2011, pp. 19-22. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,953. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,494. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,450. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 18, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,950. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 3, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 23, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,452. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 8, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 13, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 12, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 9, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,749, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,692, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,648, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,710, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,720, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,929, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,937, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,727, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,737, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,745, filed on Oct. 14, 2011, Rakesh Kumar Gupta et al. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,982. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 9, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/352,362, filed Jan. 18, 2012. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,443. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 7, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,459. |
| CFF Acrylic Pulps/Fibrillated Fibers, Datasheet [Online], Sterling Fibers, Feb. 7, 2011 [retreived Mar. 4, 2013] <url: http://www.sterlingfibers.com/wetlaid.htm> . |
| PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022832. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022834. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022835. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022838. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 29, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/021804. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 22, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,518. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 25, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 8, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483. |
| Office Action with Mail Date of Sep. 26, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507. |
| Office Action with Mail Date of Mar. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,518. |
| Office Action with Mail Date of Jan. 30, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443. |
| Office Action with Mail Date of Nov. 10, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 21, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,450. |
| Office Action with Mail Date of Nov. 10, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,484. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 17, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,001. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 23, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,615. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/648,955 filed Jan. 3,2007, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 4, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/025770. |
| Database WPI, Week 200450, Thomson Scientific, London, GB; AN 2004/520211 XP002639794 & JP 2004/137418A May 13, 2004-abstract-. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 18, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,494. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 18, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,484. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,452. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 15, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960. |
| USPTO Office Action dated May 10, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507. |
| USPTO Office Action dated May 3, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,461. |
| USPTO Office Action dated May 21, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,982. |
| Investigation of the utility of islands-in-the-stream bicomponent fiber technology in the spunbound process. Fedorova, Dec. 2006 (retrieved on Mar. 20, 2012 from internet) pp. 22-23, 74 <URL: http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/5145/1/etd.pdf>. |
| “Choosing the Proper Short Cut Fiber”, technical data sheet, MiniFibers, Inc., [online] pp. 1-2, 2006, [retrieved on Feb. 15, 2006], Retrieved from the Inernet: <URL: htts://www.minifibers.com/Literature/choosing—fiber.htm>. |
| Keith, James M., “Dispersions fo Synthetic Fibers in Wet-Lay Nonwovens”. MiniFIBERS, Inc., originally published in the Tappi Journal, vol. 77, No. 6, Jun. 1994, entire document. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2011 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,615. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,745. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,443. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 22, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,518. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,692. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 10, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521. |
| New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,466 filed Nov. 28, 2012. |
| New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,472 filed Nov. 28, 2012. |
| New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,478 filed Nov. 28, 2012. |
| New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,493 filed Nov. 28, 2012. |
| New co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,505 filed Nov. 28, 2012. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,749. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056990. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056994. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 14, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056989. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056995. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/056991. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2012 for Application No. PCT/US2011/057002. |
| Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 61/405,306 filed on Oct. 21, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 61/405,312 filed on Oct. 21, 2010, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, et al. |
| Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 61/588,744 filed on Nov. 11, 2011, Clark, et al. |
| Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,854 filed on Jan. 31, 2012, Parker, et al. |
| Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,867 filed on Jan. 31, 2010, Parker, et al. |
| Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,876 filed on Jan. 31, 2010, Parker, et al. |
| Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,917 filed on Jan. 31, 2010, Parker, et al. |
| Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,974 filed on Jan. 31, 2010, Parker, et al. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,648. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,710. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,720. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 8, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,483. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 10, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,447. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,463. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 28, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,461. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Jan. 23, 2013 for Application No. PCT/US2012/064272. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 28, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,521. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 16, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,461. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 24, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance mailed May 1, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,482. |
| USPTO Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/909,574. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,960. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,487. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,512. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 13, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,502. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,950. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 3, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/974,452. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,854 filed on Mar. 29, 2012, Clark et al. |
| New copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,812 filed on Mar. 29, 2012, Clark et al. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/199,304. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 27, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,982. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 19, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/981,950. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2012 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,487. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,456. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 29, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/022830. |
| New Co-Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/941,816 filed Jul. 15, 2013. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,854. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,812. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,749. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,745. |
| Pettersson, Patrick; “Fluid Flow in Wood Fiber Networks”; Lulea University of Technology, 2006:34, ISSN: 1402-1757. |
| USPTO Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 5, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,507. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,494. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,472. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,478. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,505. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,466. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,692. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,648. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,493. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,458. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,937. |
| USPTO Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2013 for copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/352,362. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110089595 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10850548 | May 2004 | US |
| Child | 11204868 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11344320 | Jan 2006 | US |
| Child | 12975484 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11204868 | Aug 2005 | US |
| Child | 11344320 | US | |
| Parent | 10465698 | Jun 2003 | US |
| Child | 10850548 | US |
