This application claims priority of Taiwanese application no. 101124621, filed on Jul. 9, 2012.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a process of producing a titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst, more particularly to a process of producing a titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst used for degradation of organic pollutants.
2. Description of the Related Art
It is well-known in the art that titanium dioxide functions as a photocatalyst and can be used to degrade/decompose organic pollutants. Because the band gap of titanium dioxide is about 3.2 eV, titanium dioxide has better degradation effect under radiation of UV light. However, the UV light makes up only about 5% of the total solar spectrum reaching the Earth's surface. Therefore, much effort has been devoted to developing a modified titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst which has a smaller band gap so as to utilize a broader spectrum of solar radiation, such as that shown in, for example, Taiwanese patent no. 1353964, U.S. Pat. No. 8,241,604, Taiwanese patent publication no. 200742614, etc. However, the efficiency of conventional titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst in degrading organic pollutants is still unsatisfactory.
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a process of producing a titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst used for degradation of organic pollutants. It is found that the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst of this invention, which is doped with a transition metal ion and which has silver nanoparticles deposited thereon, can be used for degradation of organic pollutants, especially methylene blue, with an excellent degradation efficiency.
According to this invention, a process of producing a titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst used for degradation of organic pollutants includes the steps of:
(a) preparing a mixture solution which includes a titanium dioxide precursor and a transition metal salt having a transition metal ion which is capable of reducing a band gap of titanium dioxide;
(b) aging the mixture solution so as to obtain a gel;
(c) treating the gel to form an ion-doped titanium dioxide in which the titanium dioxide is derived from the titanium dioxide precursor and is doped by the metal ion, and which has a band gap lower than that of a titanium dioxide;
(d) depositing silver nanoparticles on the ion-doped titanium dioxide to obtain a modified titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst; and
(e) calcining the modified titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a shows XRD results of titanium dioxide-based photocatalysts of Examples B1 to B3, which were made according to the process of the present invention;
b shows XRD results of titanium dioxide-based photocatalysts of Examples C1 to C3, which were made according to the process of the present invention;
MB solutions were respectively treated by Examples B1 and C1 and Comparative Examples D5 and E5 in a no-light environment;
Referring to
In step 101, a mixture solution is prepared in a hermetic system controlled at a temperature of about 30° C. The mixture solution is prepared by mixing ethanol absolute with deionized water, adding poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene) glycol-block-poly(ethylene glycol) thereto to obtain a premixture, adding an aqueous solution of monoprotic acid, a titanium dioxide precursor and a transition metal salt to the premixture, followed by mixing for 60 minutes. The monoprotic acid may be hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, nitric acid, etc. In the preferred embodiment, hydrochloric acid is used. The titanium dioxide precursor may be titanium alkoxide or titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4). The titanium alkoxide may be titanium (IV) isopropoxide, titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP), etc. In the preferred embodiment, titanium (IV) isopropoxide is used. The transition metal salt has a transition metal ion that is capable of reducing a band gap of titanium dioxide, and may be copper halide, copper nitrate, iron (III) nitrate, iron (III) sulfate (Fe2(SO4)3), etc. In the preferred embodiment, CuBr2 or Fe2(SO4)3 is used.
In step 102, the mixture solution is aged by heating the same from 30° C. to 110° C. at a heating rate of 1° C./minute, and maintaining the same at 110° C. until a gel is obtained.
In step 103, the gel is subjected to a calcining process to form an ion-doped titanium dioxide with an anatase phase. In the ion-doped titanium dioxide, the titanium dioxide is derived from the titanium dioxide precursor and is doped by the metal ion, and the ion-doped titanium dioxide has a band gap lower than that of a titanium dioxide. The metal ion has a mole percent ranging from 0.01% to 1% based on the total mole number of titanium ions in the ion-doped titanium dioxide.
Preferably, the gel is calcined at a temperature ranging from 200° C. to 600° C., followed by grinding to thereby obtain a plurality of ion-doped titanium dioxide particles.
In step 104, silver nanoparticles are deposited on the ion-doped titanium dioxide so as to obtain a modified titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst. In detail, the ion-doped titanium dioxide is mixed with silver nitrate in an amide solution in a no-light environment, followed by heating (e.g., hydrothermal treatment) the same in the no-light environment to subject the silver nitrate to a redox reaction such that the silver nanoparticles are formed on the ion-doped titanium dioxide. In the preferred embodiment, the amide solution includes urea. The silver nanoparticles are preferably in an amount greater than 1 wt %, more preferably in an amount ranging from 1 wt % to 10 wt %, based on the total weight of the modified titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst.
In step 105, the modified titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst is calcined at a temperature ranging from 200° C. to 600° C., preferably ranging from 400° C. to 600° C. The modified titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst also has an anatase phase, which exhibits relatively strong photoactivity.
The present invention will now be explained in more detail below by way of the following examples.
Preparation of ion-doped titanium dioxide 14 ml of ethanol absolute (99.9%, Merck) was mixed with 1 ml of deionized water, followed by mixing with gram of poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene)glycol-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (Aldrich) to obtain a premixture. 2.5 ml of hydrochloric acid (aqueous, 30-37%, Merck) and 3.574×10−2 gram of CuBr2 (95%, Katayama Chemical Industries Co., Ltd.) were mixed with the premixture, followed by mixing with 5 ml of titanium (IV) isopropoxide (97%, Aldrich) at 30° C. for 60 minutes to obtain a mixture solution. The mixture solution was heated up to 110° C. using an oil bath (silicon oil) at a heating rate of 1° C/min, and then maintained at 110° C. until a gel was obtained. Thereafter, the gel was introduced to a high temperature furnace and calcined at 400° C. for 4 hours, followed by grinding to obtain a plurality of ion-doped titanium dioxide particles. In Example A1, CuBr2 was included in the mixture solution such that copper ion has a mole percent of 1% based on the total mole number of titanium ions in the ion-doped titanium dioxide particles.
Preparation of Titanium Dioxide-Based Photocatalyst
1 gram of ion-doped titanium dioxide particles was mixed with 100 ml of an urea aqueous solution which has silver nitride (AgNO3, 95%, Katayama Chemical Industries Co., Ltd.) in a concentration of 1.03×10−2 M and which has an urea concentration of 0.42 M., followed by heating at 80° C. for 4 hours, and centrifugation to remove the residual aqueous phase. The solid phase part was washed 4 times with deionized water, vacuum dried at 100° C. for 2 hours, introduced to a high temperature furnace in which the temperature was raised to 400° C. at a rate of 2° C./min, and calcined at 400° C. for 4 hours, thereby obtaining the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst. Based on the concentration of silver nitride in the urea aqueous solution, the amount of the silver nanoparticles was speculated to be 10 wt % based on the total weight of the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst. The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example A1 was designated as Ag (10 wt %)/Cu (1%)-TiO2.
Example A2 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Example A1 except that, in the urea aqueous solution, the concentration of silver nitride was 1.03×10−3 M (i.e., the amount of the silver nanoparticles was speculated to be 1 wt % based on the total weight of the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst). The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example A2 was designated as Ag (1 wt %)/Cu (1%)-TiO2.
Example A3 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Example A1 except that, in the urea aqueous solution, the concentration of silver nitride was 1.03×10−4 M (i.e., the amount of the silver nanoparticles was speculated to be 0.1 wt % based on the total weight of the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst). The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example A3 was designated as Ag (0.1 wt %)/Cu (1%)-TiO2.
[TEM and EDS Analysis]
The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in each of Examples A1 to A3 was analyzed by a transmission electron microscope (TEM; Joel JEM-2100F) and by an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS; Joel JEM-2100F). The TEM results are shown in
From the TEM results shown in
Example B1 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Example A1 except that 3.57×10−4 gram of CuBr2 was added for mixing with the premixture. The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example B1 was designated as Ag (10 wt %)/Cu (0.01%)-TiO2.
Example B2 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Example A2 except that 3.57×10−4 gram of CuBr2 was added for mixing with the premixture. The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example B2 was designated as Ag (1 wt %)/Cu (0.01%)-TiO2.
Example B3 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Example A3 except that 3.57×10−4 gram of CuBr2 was added for mixing with the premixture. The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example B3 was designated as Ag (0.1 wt %)/Cu (0.01%)-TiO2.
Example C1 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Example A1 except that, instead of CuBr2, 3.2×10−4 gram of Fe2(SO4)3 was added for mixing with the premixture. The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example C1 was designated as Ag (10 wt %)/Fe (0.01%)-TiO2.
Example C2 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Example A2 except that 3.2×10−4 gram of Fe2(SO4)3 was added instead of CuBr2 for mixing with the premixture. The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example C1 was designated as Ag (1 wt %)/Fe (0.01%)-TiO2.
Example C3 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Example A3 except that 3.2×10−4 gram of Fe2(SO4)3 was added instead of CuBr2 for mixing with the premixture. The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in Example C1 was designated as Ag (0.1 wt %)/Fe (0.01%)-TiO2.
[XRD Analysis]
The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst prepared in each of Examples B1 to B3 and C1 to C3 was analyzed using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, TTRAX III, from Rigaku, Japan). The XRD results are shown in
A standard spectrum of an anatase phase of titanium dioxide in the JCPDS database has characteristic peaks at 2θ of about 25.281, 37.899, 48.049, 53.890, and 55.060 (also shown in
Furthermore, the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst of each of Examples B1 and C1 had a relatively large amount of silver nanoparticles (about 10 wt %). Characteristic peaks of Ag0 at 2θ (44.277, 64.426 and 77.472) can also be observed in Examples B1 and C1.
Comparative Example D1 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing the ion-doped titanium dioxide particles in Example A1, and was designated as Cu (1%)-TiO2.
Each of Comparative Examples D2 to D5 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Comparative Example D1, except that the amounts of CuBr2 in Comparative Examples D2 to D5 were different. The mole percents of copper ion in Comparative Examples D2 to D5 were 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.06%, and 0.01%, respectively, based on the total mole number of titanium ions in the ion-doped titanium dioxide particles. Comparative Examples D2 to D5 were designated as Cu (0.5%)-TiO2, Cu (0.1%)-TiO2, Cu (0.06%)-TiO2, and Cu (0.01%)-TiO2, respectively.
Comparative Example E1 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing the ion-doped titanium dioxide particles in Example A1 except that, instead of CuBr2, 3.2×10−2 gram of Fe2(SO4)3 was added for mixing with the premixture. Comparative Example E1 was designated as Fe (1%)-TiO2.
Each of Comparative Examples E2 to E5 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Comparative Example E1, except that the amounts of Fe2(SO4)3 in Comparative Examples E2 to E5 were different. The mole percents of ferric ion in Comparative Examples E2 to E5 were 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.06%, and 0.01%, respectively, based on the total mole number of titanium ions in the ion-doped titanium dioxide particles. Comparative Examples E2 to E5 were designated as Fe (0.5%)-TiO2, Fe (0.1%)-TiO2, Fe (0.06%)-TiO2, and Fe (0.01%)-TiO2, respectively.
[First Photocatalytic Activity Test (Under Visible Light of 430 nm)]
Comparative Example D1 was evaluated by the degradation of an azo dye (methylene blue, MB) using a testing system 50 shown in
MB degradation ratio=(C0−Ct/C0×100% (I)
where C0 is an initial concentration of MB and Ct is a residue concentration of MB. The results are shown in
In addition, Comparative Example D1 was further evaluated by varying the amounts of the ion-doped titanium dioxide particles (i.e., 0.3 g, 0.5 g, 1 g, and 1.5 g) for dispersion in the MB solution, and the results are also shown in
A blank experiment was also performed. In the blank experiment, 1 liter of MB solution (10 mg/L), without addition of the ion-doped titanium dioxide particles, was irradiated by visible light (430 nm) for 18 hours, and it is noted that the concentration of MB solution was substantially not reduced.
Comparative Examples D2 to D5 and E1 to E5 were also evaluated according to the procedure for evaluating Comparative Example D1.
From the results shown in
Comparative Example P1 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing the ion-doped titanium dioxide particles in Example A1, except that CuBr2 was not added. That is, Comparative Example P1 was pure titanium dioxide particles, and was designated as TiO2.
Comparative Example P2 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst of Example A1, except that CuBr2 was not added. The titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst of Comparative Example P2 was designated as Ag (10 wt %)/TiO2.
[UV/VIS Absorption]
Examples B1 to B3 and C1 to C3 and Comparative Examples P1 and P2 were analyzed using a UV-VIS spectrometer (UV-1601, JEOL) . The spectrometer recorded a scan of the UV-Vis absorbance spectrum from 250 nm to 550 nm and the results are shown in
From the results shown in
Comparative Example P3 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Comparative Example P2, except that the concentration of silver nitride in the urea aqueous solution was 1.03×10−3M (i.e., the amount of the silver nanoparticles was speculated to be 1 wt % based on the total weight of the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst). The titanium dioxide-based photo-catalyst prepared in Comparative Example P3 was designated as Ag (1 wt %)/TiO2.
Comparative Example P4 was prepared according to the procedure used for preparing Comparative Example P2, except that the concentration of silver nitride in the urea aqueous solution was 1.03×10−4M (i.e., the amount of the silver nanoparticles was speculated to be 0.1 wt % based on the total weight of the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst). The titanium dioxide-based photo-catalyst prepared in Comparative Example P4 was designated as Ag (0.1 wt %)/TiO2.
[Adsorption Test]
Example B1 was evaluated by an adsorption test, in which the temperature was controlled at 25° C., and 1 gram of the titanium dioxide-based photocatalyst of Example B1 was evenly dispersed in 1 liter of an MB solution (10 mg/L) using a magnetic stirrer (650 rpm) in a no-light environment. The MB solution was sampled at predetermined time invervals. The sampled solution was filtered using a 0.45 μm syringe filter to obtain a tested solution for calculating a concentration of MB in the tested solution. The MB residue ratio is equal to Ct/C0×100%, where C0 is an initial concentration of MB and Ct is a residue concentration of MB. The results are shown in
Example C1 and Comparative Examples D5, E5, and P2 to P4 were also evaluated according to the procedure for evaluating Example B1.
It should be noted that because this test was performed in a no-light environment, the MB was assumed not to have reacted with the photocatalyst but might have been adsorbed by the photocatalyst. From the results shown in
[Second Photocatalytic Activity Test (Under Visible Light of 430 nm)]
Examples B1 and C1 were evaluated according to the procedure of the previous adsorption test, except that the MB solution was irradiated by visible light of 430 nm in this test. The MB solution was sampled at predetermined time intervals for analyzing an MB residue ratio and a total organic carbon (TOC) residue ratio after removal of the photocatalyst. The TOC was measured using a TOC analyzer (Phoenix 8000, Tekmar-Dohrmann).
TOC residue ratio=TOCt/TOC0×100% (II)
where TOC0 is an initial TOC value of the MB solution and Tact is a TOC value of the MB solution after a period of time. The results are shown in
From the result shown in
[Third Photocatalytic Activity Test (Under Blue Light of 460˜465 nm)]
Examples B1 and C1 were evaluated according to the procedure of the second photocatalytic activity test, except that the MB solution was irradiated by blue light of 460˜465 nm in this test. The results are shown in
Based on the prior art disclosure (see Wan-jiun Chen, “Characterization and Photooxidation of N-doped Photocatalyst Prepared by Thermal Deposition,” Master's Thesis, 2008, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering), MB treated by a conventional nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide had a degradation ratio of 68% when being irradiated by blue light. From the result shown in
From the result shown in
[Fourth Photocatalytic Activity Test (Under Yellow Light of 588˜593 nm)]
Examples B1 and C1 were evaluated according to the procedure of the second photocatalytic activity test, except that the MB solution was irradiated by yellow light of 588˜593 nm in this test. The results are shown in
From the result shown in
MB was not completely decomposed into carbon dioxide. It has thus been shown that the photocatalyst made according to the process of this invention has a relatively high MB residue ratio and a relatively high TOC residue ratio when being irradiated by yellow light that provides relatively low energy.
While the present invention has been described in connection with what are considered the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is understood that this invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments but is intended to cover various arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the broadest interpretations and equivalent arrangements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101124621 | Jul 2012 | TW | national |