Patent Grant
9926219
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of combustion furnaces and methods of use, and more specifically to processes for producing hollow glass fiber or glass fibers comprising bubbles using a turbulent submerged combustion melter, and burners for carrying out such processes.
In submerged combustion melting of glass and similar materials, combustion gases emitted from sidewall-mounted and/or floor-mounted burners are injected beneath the surface of a molten or partially molten mass of material being melted in a melter vessel and rise upward through the molten or partially molten mass. The molten or partially molten mass of material is a complex mixture of molten feed material (feed material is commonly referred to as “batch” in the glass industry), unmelted batch, and gases from the burners and evolved gases from the reaction of and/or decomposition of batch materials. Recycled glass or “cullet”, as well as various waste materials of varying glass content (such as fiberglass batting or even loose fibers) may also be present. The materials are heated at a high efficiency via the intimate contact with the combustion gases. Using submerged combustion burners produces turbulence of the molten material or partially molten material. Vibration of the burners and/or the melter vessel walls themselves, due to sloshing of molten material, pulsing of combustion burners, popping of large bubbles above or aside of submerged burners, ejection of molten material from the melt against the walls and ceiling of melter vessel, and the like, are possible.
Traditional methods of making hollow fibers employ a bushing and a source of air feeding the air into the molten glass as it passes through a bushing. U.S. Pat. No. 2,269,459 discloses using a tube for injecting air into molten glass discharging vertically downward from a vessel, the tube extending through a bushing on the bottom of the melter. The initial hollow fiber formed is then drawn through and heated in a burner that provides intense flame and heat to form a much smaller diameter hollow fiber. Bushings are described in a series of patents for making fibers having intermittent hollowness along their length, as well as hollow glass fibers of more uniform hollowness, more ratio of ID/OD, and better concentricity of the central lumen. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,421,873; 3,510,393; 3,268,313; 4,735,642; and 4,758,259. None of these patents use or discuss submerged combustion. None of the previous solutions have recognized that submerged combustion produces a turbulent molten glass that has approximately 40 percent by volume gas bubbles. In fact, traditional glass melting technologies seek to reduce bubble content when making glass fibers, as it leads to frequent processing problems due to fiber breakage during drawing. Molten glass fining is called for to reduce or eliminate bubbles, the fining employing conditioning channels that may be difficult and/or expensive to operate.
It would be a significant advance in the glass melting art to develop processes of making hollow glass fibers, or solid glass fibers having entrained bubbles therein, and apparatus and systems to make such fibers.
In accordance with the present disclosure, processes, systems, and apparatus for carrying out the processes are described that produce hollow glass fibers, or solid glass fibers having entrained bubbles therein, using submerged combustion melters. The processes, systems, and apparatus described herein are relevant to the full range of glass precursor materials that may be melted with submerged combustion technology, but are particularly well-suited for “glass batch”, as that term is defined herein.
A first aspect of this disclosure is a process comprising:
A second aspect of this disclosure is a process comprising:
A third aspect of this disclosure is a system comprising:
A fourth aspect of this disclosure is an apparatus comprising:
A fifth aspect of this disclosure is an apparatus comprising:
Processes, systems, and apparatus of this disclosure will become more apparent upon review of the brief description of the drawings, the detailed description of the disclosure, and the claims that follow.
The manner in which the objectives of the disclosure and other desirable characteristics can be obtained is explained in the following description and attached drawings in which:
It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings are not to scale and illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure, and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of various, process, system, and apparatus embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the melter apparatus and processes of using same may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible which are nevertheless considered within the appended claims. All U.S. published patent applications and U.S. Patents referenced herein are hereby explicitly incorporated herein by reference. In the event definitions of terms in the referenced patents and applications conflict with how those terms are defined in the present application, the definitions for those terms that are provided in the present application shall be deemed controlling.
Certain process embodiments may comprise controlling flow of the molten material comprising bubbles through the forehearth and bushings so that fibers produced through the bushings are substantially consistent in volume of regions devoid of glass. As used herein the phrase “substantially consistent in volume of regions devoid of glass” means that the fibers may be either random or non-random in the shape of their void regions, but that the fibers nevertheless have about the same volume of gas inclusions or bubbles. The gas inclusions or bubbles need not be round, and may be oblong or irregular in shape.
Certain system embodiments may comprise a forehearth fluidly connected to the melter exit structure without any intervening channel or component. As used herein the phrase “without any intervening channel or component” means the forehearth is directly connected to the melter exit structure without any refining channel in between the melter exit structure and forehearth. In certain embodiments, as explained further herein, a first forehearth may be fluidly connected to a second forehearth by a distribution channel.
The phrase “at least one burner directing combustion products of an oxidant and a first fuel into the melting zone under a level of the molten material in the zone” as used herein means that combustion gases emanate from burners under the level of the molten glass; the burners may be floor-mounted, wall-mounted, or in melter embodiments comprising more than one submerged combustion burner, any combination thereof (for example, two floor mounted burners and one wall mounted burner). As used herein the term “combustion gases” means substantially gaseous mixtures of combusted fuel, any excess oxidant, and combustion products, such as oxides of carbon (such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide), oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, and water. Combustion products may include liquids and solids, for example soot and unburned liquid fuels.
The phrase “turbulent melting zone” means that zone in a submerged combustion melter wherein there is very turbulent, sometimes extraordinarily turbulent conditions inside the submerge combustion melter. The phrase “turbulent molten material” means molten material that is in a condition of high turbulence, with many bubbles of combustion product gases and gases evolved from the glass batch materials becoming entrained in the molten material and some of the bubbles bursting as they reach the surface of the molten mass. This high degree of turbulence can increase the mechanical load on the melter vessel walls significantly, especially in embodiments where some or all of the walls are fluid-cooled, as fluid-cooled wall structures may be made thinner than non-cooled walls since the frozen or highly viscous glass layer formed thereon protects the walls better than non-cooled walls. Therefore, while there may be savings in cost of materials for submerged combustion melter vessels with thinner, fluid-cooled walls, and fuel savings due to better heat transfer to the melt, there may be adverse physical impacts on the melter structure due to the very high turbulence imparted during submerged combustion.
The phrase “glass batch” as used herein refers to the initial raw material, or glass source material, and may include any material suitable for forming molten glass such as, for example, limestone, glass, sand, soda ash, feldspar and mixtures thereof. It is important to recognize the difference between the glass batch composition and the glass forming ingredients or components of the glass batch. See for example “Glass Melting”, Battelle PNNL MST Handbook, U.S. Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, retrieved 2012 Apr. 20. In one embodiment, a glass composition for producing glass fibers may be “E-glass,” which typically includes 52-56% SiO2, 12-16% Al2O3, 0-0.8% Fe2O3, 16-25% CaO, 0-6% MgO, 0-10% B2O3, 0-2% Na2O+K2O, 0-1.5% TiO2 and 0-1% F2. Other glass compositions may be used, such as those described in Applicant's published U.S. applications 2007/0220922 and 2008/0276652. The initial raw material to provide these glass compositions can be calculated from information such as in Table 1, reproduced from the above 2007/0220922 application. Notice that during glass melting, carbon dioxide (from limestone (CaCO3) and water (from borax (Na2B4O7*10H2O)) evaporate.
The term “air-fuel burner” means a combustion burner that combusts one or more fuels with only air, while the term “oxy-fuel burner” means a combustion burner that combusts one or more fuels with either oxygen alone, or employs oxygen-enriched air, or some other combination of air and oxygen, including combustion burners where the primary oxidant is air, and secondary and tertiary oxidants are oxygen. Burners may be comprised of metal, ceramic, ceramic-lined metal, or combination thereof. “Air” as used herein includes ambient air as well as gases having the same molar concentration of oxygen as air. “Oxygen-enriched air” means air having oxygen concentration greater than 21 mole percent. “Oxygen” includes “pure” oxygen, such as industrial grade oxygen, food grade oxygen, and cryogenic oxygen. Oxygen-enriched air may have 50 mole percent or more oxygen, and in certain embodiments may be 90 mole percent or more oxygen. Oxidants such as air, oxygen-enriched air, and pure oxygen may be supplied from a pipeline, cylinders, storage facility, cryogenic air separation unit, membrane permeation separator, or adsorption unit.
The term “fuel”, according to this disclosure, means a combustible composition (either in gaseous, liquid, or solid form, or any flowable combination of these) comprising a major portion of, for example, methane, natural gas, liquefied natural gas, propane, atomized oil, powders or the like. Fuels useful in the disclosure may comprise minor amounts of non-fuels therein, including oxidants, for purposes such as premixing the fuel with the oxidant, or atomizing liquid fuels. The terms “first” or “primary” fuel, and “second” or “secondary” fuel mean that the first fuel and second fuel have different compositions and/or physical characteristics, although they may have overlapping components, and may have some similar physical characteristics. For example, natural gas as a primary fuel may include some butane, and butane may be employed as a secondary fuel. Tertiary fuels may also be used, that is, more than two fuels. The term “alternate gas” includes reactive gases and inert gases, and mixtures thereof, substances that are gases at ambient conditions, as well as compounds that are liquids at ambient conditions, but that vaporize at temperatures in a submerged combustion melter, such as carbon disulfide. Reactive gases include, but are not limited to, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrous oxide, nitrous oxide, oxides of sulfur, fluorine, chlorine, silane, and the like. Inert gases include, but are not limited to, gases such as nitrogen, argon, xenon, and the like.
At least some of the burners may be floor-mounted, and in certain embodiments the floor-mounted burners may be positioned in one or more parallel rows substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the melter. In certain embodiments, the number of floor-mounted burners in each row may be proportional to width of the melter. In certain embodiments the depth of the melter may decrease as width of the melter decreases. In certain other embodiments, an intermediate location may comprise a constant width zone positioned between an expanding zone and a narrowing zone of the melter, in accordance with Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 8,769,992.
At least some of the burners may be oxy-fuel burners. In certain embodiments the oxy-fuel burners may comprise one or more submerged oxy-fuel combustion burners each having co-axial fuel and oxidant tubes forming an annular space there between, wherein the outer tube extends beyond the end of the inner tube, as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 7,273,583. In certain other embodiments the oxy-fuel burners may comprise one or more adjustable flame submerged oxy-fuel combustion burners as taught in Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 8,875,544. In certain embodiments, the burners may be modified as described herein to provide one or more conduits or tubes for supplying a secondary, tertiary or lower order fuel, or alternative gas species, to control or modify parameters of gaseous inclusions in the fibers produced.
In certain embodiments, the melter apparatus may have a floor size for a given throughput of 2 ft2/stpd or less, and in certain embodiment may have a floor size for a given throughput of 0.5 ft2/stpd or less, where “stpd” means “short tons per day.” Stated differently, in certain embodiments, the methods herein may comprise discharging at least 0.5 short tons per day per square foot of melter floor, and in certain exemplary processes, at least 2 short tons per day per square foot of melter floor. The entrainment of one or more gases within the fibers may reduce the amount of glass necessary to generate a specific length or volumetric quantity of fiber, which may reduce the overall cost. Also, by utilizing glass that has a void fraction of gaseous bubbles for fiberization, the need for expensive and energy intensive downstream equipment and processes to remove or “fine” the glass is unnecessary, resulting in improved capital costs.
Certain exemplary processes and systems of this disclosure may comprise cooling various components using fluid-cooled refractory panels and directing a heat transfer fluid through the panels. The term “fluid-cooled” means cooling using gaseous, liquid, or combination thereof, heat transfer media. The wall may comprise a refractory liner at least between the fluid-cooled panels and the molten glass. In certain embodiments, the refractory cooled-panels comprising the walls of the melter vessel, the fluid-cooled skimmer, and fluid-cooled dams, may be cooled by a heat transfer fluid selected from the group consisting of gaseous, liquid, or combinations of gaseous and liquid compositions that functions or is capable of being modified to function as a heat transfer fluid. Different cooling fluids may be used in the various components, or separate portions of the same cooling composition may be employed in all components. Gaseous heat transfer fluids may be selected from air, including ambient air and treated air (for air treated to remove moisture), inert inorganic gases, such as nitrogen, argon, and helium, inert organic gases such as fluoro-, chloro- and chlorofluorocarbons, including perfluorinated versions, such as tetrafluoromethane, and hexafluoroethane, and tetrafluoroethylene, and the like, and mixtures of inert gases with small portions of non-inert gases, such as hydrogen. Heat transfer liquids may be selected from inert liquids, which may be organic, inorganic, or some combination thereof, for example, salt solutions, glycol solutions, oils and the like. Other possible heat transfer fluids include steam (if cooler than the oxygen manifold temperature), carbon dioxide, or mixtures thereof with nitrogen. Heat transfer fluids may be compositions comprising both gas and liquid phases, such as the higher chlorofluorocarbons.
Conduits, tubes, and adjustable, changeable, removable bodies used in burners of the present disclosure may be comprised of metal, ceramic, ceramic-lined metal, or combination thereof. Suitable metals include stainless steels, for example, but not limited to, 306 and 316 steel, as well as titanium alloys, aluminum alloys, and the like.
Referring now to the figures,
System 100, and other systems of this disclosure, may comprise a source chamber for sourcing raw feed materials (for example glass batch) and a feed processing unit, such as described in Applicant's pending U.S. Ser. No. 13/540,704 filed Jul. 3, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,643,869, issued May 9, 2017. In these embodiments, the source chamber defines an initial environment, while feed processing unit defines a second environment. In initial environment the feed materials are at a first density, while in second environment the feed materials are transformed to have a second density greater than the first density, as well as having a degree of compaction, at least surface compaction, that work together to reduce fines from escaping up melter exhaust 8 during operation of the systems.
The initial raw material may be introduced into, and molten glass with bubbles may be produced from the melters of systems of the present disclosure on a batch, semi-continuous or continuous basis. The amount of the initial raw material introduced into the melter is generally a function of, for example, the capacity and operating conditions of the melter as well as the rate at which the molten material is removed from the melter.
The initial raw material may include any material suitable for forming molten glass such as, for example, glass batches comprising combinations of limestone, sand, trona, lime, albite, orthoclase dolomite, borax, soda ash, feldspar, and the like, and mixtures thereof. In certain embodiments, the initial raw materials may include batch components suitable for producing “E-glass” fibers, which typically include 52-56% SiO2, 12-16% Al2O3, 0-0.8% Fe2O3, 16-25% CaO, 0-6% MgO, 0-10% B2O3, 0-2% Na2O+K2O, 0-1.5% TiO2 and 0-1% F2. Other glass compositions may be used, such as those described in Applicant's published U.S. application 2008/0276652. The initial raw material can be provided in any form such as, for example, relatively small particles.
Referring now to
System embodiment 300 illustrated schematically in
In certain systems and processes of the present disclosure, a frozen and/or highly viscous glass layer or layers may be formed on the inside surfaces of wall 6 due to the use of fluid-cooled panels for these walls. One or more or all of wall 6, floor 2, and roof 4 may be comprised of a metal shell and a fluid-cooled refractory panel, not illustrated in the figures.
Melter exit structure 22 for discharging the molten glass or similar material is provided in systems 100, 20, and 300. Melter exit structure 22 may fluidly and mechanically connect the melter vessel to a forehearth 26, 26A, or 26B. Melter exit structure 22 may comprise a fluid-cooled transition channel, having generally rectangular cross-section, although any other cross-sections would suffice, such as hexagonal, trapezoidal, oval, circular, and the like. Regardless of cross-sectional shape, melter exit structure 22 may be fluid-cooled and configured to form a frozen glass layer or highly viscous glass layer, or combination thereof, on inner surfaces of structure 22 and thus protect melter exit structure 22 from the mechanical energy imparted from the melter vessel to melter exit structure 22.
A fluid-cooled skimmer (not illustrated) may be provided, extending downward from the ceiling of the melter vessel and positioned upstream of melter exit structure 22. A fluid-cooled skimmer, if present, may have a lower distal end extending a distance ranging from about 1 inch to about 12 inches (from about 2.5 cm to about 30 cm) below the average melt level in the melter. The fluid-cooled skimmer may be configured to form a frozen glass layer or highly viscous glass layer, or combination thereof, on its outer surfaces. The skimmer lower distal end may define, in conjunction with the floor of the melter, a throat of the melter vessel configured to control flow of molten glass from the melter vessel into melter exit structure 22. Preferably, the throat is arranged below average melt level. Molten material can be removed from melter exit structure 22 on a batch, semi-continuous basis or continuous basis. In an exemplary embodiment, the molten material including a plurality of bubbles continuously flows through the throat and generally horizontally through melter exit structure 22, and is removed continuously from melter exit structure to a forehearth. Thereafter, the molten material can be processed by any suitable technique, for example, a process for forming hollow glass fibers.
Certain embodiments may include an overlapping refractory material layer on at least the inner surface of fluid-cooled transition channel that are exposed to molten material. In certain embodiments the overlapping refractory material may comprise a seamless insert of dense chrome, molybdenum, or other dense ceramic or metallic material. The dense chrome or other refractory material may be inserted into the melter exit structure and may provide a seamless transition from the melter vessel to a forehearth.
Referring to
Embodiments 400 and 500 and those similar thereto may be employed to produce fibers having different gaseous compositions of bubbles or regions devoid of glass. For example, referring again to
Dams 42, 44, 60, and 62 may be manipulated by a prime mover, such as one or more motors, jack screws, hydraulic or pneumatic cylinders or the like. Fluid-cooled dams may comprise dimensions allowing the dam(s) to be extended an entire distance from ceiling to floor of the melter and completely isolate the melting zones of the melter vessel from the forehearth.
As noted herein, in certain embodiments it may be beneficial to inject alternative, non-fuel gas species into molten glass produced by an SCM. One or more tubes or conduits 712, 714 may be provided for this purpose, as illustrated schematically in FIGS. 7 and 7A. Tubes or conduits 712, 714 may terminate near the flow exit of annulus B in ports 713A, 713B, respectively, positioned in primary oxidant conduit 704. Conduits 712, 714 may be positioned in thru-holes 722, 716, respectively, in a first end plate 715. Optional valves 736 may be provided to control and/or adjust flow of alternate gas species through conduits 712, 714. Thru-holes 728, 730 allow a cooling fluid such as water to enter and exit outer annulus A for cooling. One or more valves 740 may be provided to control in-flow of primary fuel.
Referring now to
Another component of burner embodiments of the present disclosure is an adjustable, changeable and removable structure or insert, designated 824 in
Insert 824 includes a body 833 having a central hub 826 that is, in certain embodiments, parallel to longitudinal axis A1, but not necessarily so, hub 826 including a central passage having an exit 825 that is, in certain embodiments, perpendicular to longitudinal axis A1, but not necessarily so. Body 833 includes an upper surface 836 and a lower surface 838, and one or more non-central passages 834. In
As illustrated in embodiment 800, insert 824 may include a circumferential lip 840 that abuts against an overhang portion 815 of end cap 813. End cap 813 has a length or height L1, and lip 840 has a length L2 from overhang portion 815 to upper surface 836 of insert 824, where L2 may range from about 0.25 inch to about 2 inches. Circumferential lip extension 840 extends away from upper surface 836 of insert 824 and generally parallel to longitudinal axis L1. End cap 813 may extend above exit 825 of the substantially central passage of hub 826 a distance L1, which may range from about 0.5 inch to about 6 inches. Vertical connector section 829 may have a length L3 ranging from about 0.25 inch to about 1 inch. As illustrated in
Hub 826 includes, in embodiment 800, an angled or tapered section 827 connecting exit 825 and a vertical connector section 829 that connects angled section 827 with a threaded section 828. Threads on threaded section 828 mate with corresponding threads 830 on an upper end 832 of inner conduit 802. This threaded connection allows removal of insert 824 and/or adjustment of burner parameters, as discussed further herein.
In certain embodiments, embodiment 800 may include one or more optional tubes or conduits 823 for admitting a non-fuel gas species through annulus A. A corresponding number of thru-holes or ports 823A would be provided in these embodiments in a bottom portion 841 of conduit 810.
In embodiment 800, various constructions may be envisioned that would provide the adjustment feature for adjustable component 824 and the options for introducing a secondary fuel and/or alternate non-fuel gas species. Tubes 808, 812 may be welded or brazed to component 824 so that the tubes line up with the non-central passages 834. Component 824 could be snuggly yet relatively loosely positioned inside of conduit 804, and the whole weldment comprising component 824 and tubes 808, 812 rotated as desired. Numerous other operable constructions would be possible and within this disclosure.
Process embodiment 1000 of
Process embodiment 1100 of
In operation of systems and processes of this disclosure, feed material, such as E-glass batch (melts at about 1400° C.), insulation glass batch (melts at about 1200° C.), and the like, is optionally processed in a feed processing unit as described, producing densified material, then fed to the melter through a feed chute and melter inlet. Scrap in the form of glass fiber mat and/or insulation having high organic binder content, glass cullet, and the like may be separately fed to the melter. One or more submerged combustion burners are fired to melt the feed materials and to maintain a turbulent molten glass melt. Molten glass moves toward melter exit, and is discharged from the melter directly to a forehearth having one or more bushings, producing the hollow fibers, or fibers having regions devoid of glass. Winders or choppers receive the fibers, making continuous fiber or chopped fiber.
Glass fiber formation, or fiberization, involves a combination of extrusion and attenuation. In extrusion, the molten glass passes out of the forehearth through one or more bushings made of an erosion-resistant platinum/rhodium alloy with very fine orifices, from 200 to as many as 8,000. Bushing plates are heated electronically, and their temperature may be precisely controlled to maintain a constant glass viscosity. Water jets may be used to cool the filaments as they exit the bushing at roughly 1204° C./2200° F. Attenuation is the process of mechanically drawing the extruded streams of molten glass into fibrous elements called filaments, with an outer diameter ranging from about 4 μm to about 40 μm. A high-speed winder catches the molten streams and, because it revolves at a circumferential speed of ˜2 miles/˜3 km per minute (much faster than the molten glass exits the bushings), tension is applied, drawing them into thin filaments.
Bushing nozzle diameter determines filament diameter, and the nozzle quantity equals the number of ends. A 4,000-nozzle bushing may be used to produce a single roving product or the process can be configured to make four rovings with 1,000 ends each. The bushing also controls the fiber yield or yards of fiber per pound of glass. The processes and systems of the present disclosure allow production of more yards of fiber per pound of glass, due to the existence of the regions devoid of glass. (The metric unit, tex, measures fiber linear density; 1 tex=1 g/km, and yield is the inverse, yd/lb.) A fiber with a yield of 1,800 yd/lb (275 tex) would have a smaller diameter than a 56 yd/lb (8,890 tex) fiber, and an 800-nozzle bushing produces a smaller yield than a 4,000-nozzle bushing. The range of fiber diameter, or micronage, may become more varied as composite reinforcements have become more specialized.
A chemical coating, or size, may be applied to the fibers. Size is typically added at 0.5 to 2.0 percent by weight and may include lubricants, binders and/or coupling agents. Lubricants help to protect the filaments from abrading and breaking as they are collected and wound into forming packages and, later, when they are processed by weavers or other converters into fabrics or other reinforcement forms. Coupling agents may cause the fiber to have an affinity for a particular resin chemistry, improving resin “wetout” and strengthening the adhesive bond at the fiber-matrix interface. Some size chemistries are compatible only with polyester resin and some only with epoxy while others may be used with a variety of resins.
The drawn, sized filaments may be collected together into a bundle, forming a glass strand composed of 51 to 1,624 filaments. The strand is wound onto a drum into a forming package that resembles a spool of thread. The forming packages, still wet from water cooling and sizing, are then dried in an oven, and afterward they are ready to be palletized and shipped or further processed into chopped fiber, roving or yarn. Roving is a collection of strands with little or no twist. An assembled roving, for example, made from 10 to 15 strands wound together into a multi-end roving package, may require additional handling and processing steps. Yarn is made from one or more strands, which may be twisted to protect the integrity of the yarn during subsequent processing operations, such as weaving.
Combustion product gases (flue gases) exit through stack, or may be routed to heat recovery apparatus. If oxy-fuel combustion is employed in some or all burners, the general principle is to operate combustion in the burners in a manner that replaces some of the air with a separate source of oxygen. The overall combustion ratio may not change. Throughput of melter apparatus described in the present disclosure may be 0.5 short ton per day per ft2 of melter footprint (0.5 stpd/ft2) or more, and in some embodiments 2 stpd/ft2 or more. This is at least twice, in certain embodiments ten times the throughput of conventional (non-SC) melter apparatus.
Processes and systems of the present disclosure may be controlled in a number of different manners. In certain embodiments a master controller may be employed, but the processes and systems described herein are not so limited, as any combination of controllers could be used. The controller may be selected from PI controllers, PID controllers (including any known or reasonably foreseeable variations of these), and may compute a residual equal to a difference between a measured value and a set point to produce an output to one or more control elements. The phrase “PID controller” means a controller using proportional, integral, and derivative features. In some cases the derivative mode may not be used or its influence reduced significantly so that the controller may be deemed a PI controller. It will also be recognized by those of skill in the control art that there are existing variations of PI and PID controllers, depending on how the discretization is performed. These known and foreseeable variations of PI, PID and other controllers are considered within the disclosure.
The controller may compute the residual continuously or non-continuously. Other possible implementations of the processes and systems of the present disclosure are those wherein the controller may comprise more specialized control strategies, such as strategies selected from feed forward, cascade control, internal feedback loops, model predictive control, neural networks, and Kalman filtering techniques. The controller may receive input signals from, and provide output signals for, for example, but not limited to, the following parameters: velocity of fuel entering a burner; velocity of primary oxidant entering a burner; velocity of secondary oxidant entering a burner; mass flow rate of primary and/or secondary or tertiary fuel entering a burner; mass flow rate of primary oxidant entering a burner; temperature of a fuel entering a burner; temperature of primary oxidant entering a burner; mass flow rate of alternate gaseous species; pressure of primary oxidant entering a burner; humidity of primary oxidant; feed rate of material into the melter, flow rate of molten material out of the melter, mass flow rate of hot effluent exhaust, mass flow rates of input and output heat transfer fluids for fluid-cooled panels, and the like. Burner geometry and combustion ratio are other examples of input signals.
Submerged combustion burner combustion (flame) temperature may be controlled by monitoring one or more parameters selected from velocity of the fuel, velocity of the primary oxidant, mass and/or volume flow rate of the fuel, mass and/or volume flow rate of the primary oxidant, energy content of the fuel, temperature of the fuel as it enters the burner, temperature of the primary oxidant as it enters the burner, temperature of the effluent, pressure of the primary oxidant entering the burner, humidity of the oxidant, burner geometry, combustion ratio, and combinations thereof. Exemplary processes and systems of the disclosure comprise a combustion controller which receives one or more input parameters selected from velocity of the fuel, velocity of the primary oxidant, mass and/or volume flow rate of the fuel, mass and/or volume flow rate of the primary oxidant, energy content of the fuel, temperature of the fuel as it enters the burner, temperature of the primary oxidant as it enters the burner, pressure of the oxidant entering the burner, humidity of the oxidant, burner geometry, oxidation ratio, temperature of the effluent and combinations thereof, and employs a control algorithm to control combustion temperature based on one or more of these input parameters.
The term “control”, used as a transitive verb, means to verify or regulate by comparing with a standard or desired value. Control may be closed loop, feedback, feed-forward, cascade, model predictive, adaptive, heuristic and combinations thereof. The term “controller” means a device at least capable of accepting input from sensors and meters in real time or near-real time, and sending commands directly to control elements, and/or to local devices associated with control elements able to accept commands. A controller may also be capable of accepting input from human operators; accessing databases, such as relational databases; sending data to and accessing data in databases, data warehouses or data marts; and sending information to and accepting input from a display device readable by a human. A controller may also interface with or have integrated therewith one or more software application modules, and may supervise interaction between databases and one or more software application modules.
The apparatus (sometimes referred to herein as burners) used for submerged combustion may provide an amount of heat which is effective to melt the initial raw material to form the molten material, and to maintain the molten material in its molten state. The optimal temperature for melting the initial raw material and maintaining the molten material in its molten state can depend on, for example, the composition of the initial raw material and the rate at which the molten material is removed from the melter apparatus, and the composition of fuels, oxidants, and alternative gas species. For example, the maximum temperature in the melter apparatus can be at least about 1400° C., preferably from about 1400° C. to about 1650° C. The temperature of the molten material can be from about 1050° C. to about 1450° C.; however, systems and processes of the present disclosure are not limited to operation within the above temperature ranges. The molten material removed from the melter apparatus is typically a substantially homogeneous composition, but is not limited thereto.
Submerged combustion burners useful in the systems and processes described herein (and that are not modified as described herein for introduction of alternative fuels and/or gaseous species) include those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,539,034; 3,170,781; 3,237,929; 3,260,587; 3,606,825; 3,627,504; 3,738,792; 3,764,287; 7,273,583, and Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 8,875,544, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Regardless of the burner type selected, the general idea is for the burners to provide heat energy to a bath of molten material and simultaneously create a well-mixed, turbulent molten material. The burners function by firing a burning gaseous or liquid fuel-oxidant mixture into a volume of molten material. The burners described in the '583 patent provide a stable flame at the point of injection of the fuel-oxidant mixture into the melt to prevent the formation of frozen melt downstream as well as to prevent any resultant explosive combustion, and constant, reliable, and rapid ignition of the fuel-oxidant mixture such that the mixture burns quickly inside the molten material and releases the heat of combustion into the melt. Completion of the combustion process results in bubbles rising to the surface of the turbulent melt. The location of the injection point for the fuel-oxidant mixture below the surface of the melting material enhances mixing of the components being melted and increases homogeneity of the melt. Thermal NOx emissions are greatly reduced due to the lower flame temperatures resulting from the melt-quenched flame and further due to insulation of the high temperature flame from the atmosphere.
Melter apparatus useful in processes and systems in accordance with the present disclosure may also comprise one or more wall-mounted submerged combustion burners, and/or one or more roof-mounted burners. Roof-mounted burners may be useful to pre-heat the melter apparatus melting zone and may serve as ignition sources for one or more submerged combustion burners. Melter apparatus having only wall-mounted, submerged-combustion burners are also considered within the present disclosure. Roof-mounted burners may be oxy-fuel burners, but as they are only used in certain situations, are more likely to be air/fuel burners. Most often they would be shut-off after pre-heating the melter and/or after starting one or more submerged combustion burners. In certain embodiments, all submerged combustion burners are oxy-fuel burners (where “oxy” means oxygen, or oxygen-enriched air, as described earlier), but this is not necessarily so in all embodiments; some or all of the submerged combustion burners may be air-fuel burners. Furthermore, heating may be supplemented by electrical heating in certain embodiments, in certain melter and forehearth zones.
The total quantities of fuel and oxidant used by the combustion system are such that the flow of oxygen may range from about 0.9 to about 1.2 of the theoretical stoichiometric flow of oxygen necessary to obtain the complete combustion of the fuel flow. Another expression of this statement is that the combustion ratio may range from about 0.9 to about 1.2, inclusive of the end numbers, and possibly higher or lower in certain embodiments. In certain embodiments, the equivalent fuel content of the feed material must be taken into account. For example, organic binders in glass fiber mat scrap materials will increase the oxidant requirement above that required strictly for fuel being combusted. In consideration of these embodiments, the combustion ratio may be increased above 1.2, for example to 1.5, or to 2, or 2.5, or even higher, depending on the organic content of the feed materials.
The velocity of the fuel in the various submerged combustion burners depends on the burner geometry used, but generally is at least about 15 m/s. The upper limit of fuel velocity depends primarily on the desired mixing of the melt in the melter apparatus, melter geometry, and the geometry of the burner; if the fuel velocity is too low, the flame temperature may be too low, providing inadequate melting, which is not desired, and if the fuel flow is too high, flame might impinge on the melter floor, roof or wall, and/or heat will be wasted, and/or batch fines may short-circuit the melter and escape through the stack (despite the feed densification discussed herein) which is also not desired, and/or the degree of turbulence may so great as to be detrimental to refractory, or other materials of construction. High turbulence may also produce an undesirably high amount of foam or bubbles in the melt that cannot produce hollow fibers, or fibers having regions devoid of glass.
Those of skill in this art will readily understand the need for, and be able to construct suitable fuel supply conduits and oxidant supply conduits, as well as respective flow control valves, threaded fittings, quick connect/disconnect fittings, hose fittings, and the like.
Melter apparatus useful in the various embodiments described in accordance with the present disclosure may be constructed using only fluid-cooled refractory panels, with or without a thin refractory “glass-contact” liner. The thin refractory liner may be 1 centimeter, 2 centimeters, 3 centimeters or more in thickness, however, greater thickness may entail more expense without resultant greater benefit. The refractory liner may be one or multiple layers. Alternatively, melters described herein may be constructed using cast concretes such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,323,718. The thin refractory linings discussed herein may comprise materials described in the '718 patent, which is incorporated herein by reference. Two cast concrete layers are described in the '718 patent, the first being a hydraulically setting insulating composition (for example, that known under the trade designation CASTABLE BLOC-MIX-G, a product of Fleischmann Company, Frankfurt/Main, Federal Republic of Germany). This composition may be poured in a form of a wall section of desired thickness, for example a layer 5 cm thick, or 10 cm, or greater. This material is allowed to set, followed by a second layer of a hydraulically setting refractory casting composition (such as that known under the trade designation RAPID BLOCK RG 158, a product of Fleischmann company, Frankfurt am Main, Federal Republic of Germany) may be applied thereonto. Other suitable materials for the refractory cooled panels, melter refractory liners, and refractory block burners (if used) are fused zirconia (ZrO2), fused cast AZS (alumina-zirconia-silica), rebonded AZS, or fused cast alumina (Al2O3). The choice of a particular material is dictated among other parameters by the melter geometry and type of glass to be produced.
Forehearths useful in the various embodiments described in accordance with the present disclosure may be constructed using similar materials as the melters, except that fluid-cooled panels are not typically used (however, their use is not ruled out). Suitable forehearths include those available from Nikolaus Sorg Gmbh & Co. KG, Lohr am Main, Germany.
Although only a few exemplary embodiments of this disclosure have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel apparatus and processes described herein. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the following claims. In the claims, no clauses are intended to be in the means-plus-function format allowed by 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 unless “means for” is explicitly recited together with an associated function. “Means for” clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/686,102 filed Apr. 14, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,493,375 issued Nov. 15, 2016, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/540,771, filed Jul. 3, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,032,760 issued May 15, 2015.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1579353 | Good | Apr 1926 | A |
| 1636151 | Schofield | Jul 1927 | A |
| 1679295 | Dodge | Jul 1928 | A |
| 1706857 | Mathe | Mar 1929 | A |
| 1716433 | Ellis | Jun 1929 | A |
| 1875474 | McKinley | Sep 1932 | A |
| 1883023 | Slick | Oct 1932 | A |
| 1937321 | Howard | Nov 1933 | A |
| 1944855 | Wadman | Jan 1934 | A |
| 1989103 | McKelvey et al. | Jan 1935 | A |
| 2042560 | Stewart | Jun 1936 | A |
| 2064546 | Kutchka | Dec 1936 | A |
| 2174533 | See et al. | Oct 1939 | A |
| 2118479 | McCaskey | Jan 1940 | A |
| 2269459 | Kieist | Jan 1942 | A |
| 2432942 | See et al. | Dec 1947 | A |
| 2455907 | Slayter | Jan 1948 | A |
| 2597858 | Howard | May 1952 | A |
| 2658094 | Nonken | Nov 1953 | A |
| 2677003 | Arbeit et al. | Apr 1954 | A |
| 2679749 | Poole | Jun 1954 | A |
| 2691689 | Arbeit et al. | Oct 1954 | A |
| 2718096 | Henry et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
| 2773545 | Petersen | Dec 1956 | A |
| 2781756 | Kobe | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2867972 | Holderreed et al. | Jan 1959 | A |
| 2878644 | Fenn | Mar 1959 | A |
| 2890166 | Heinze | Jun 1959 | A |
| 2902029 | Hill | Sep 1959 | A |
| 2981250 | Stewart | Apr 1961 | A |
| 3020165 | Davis | Feb 1962 | A |
| 3056283 | Tiede | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3073683 | Switzer et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3084392 | Labino | Apr 1963 | A |
| 3088312 | Bitterlich et al. | May 1963 | A |
| 3104947 | Switzer et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
| 3129087 | Hagy | Apr 1964 | A |
| 3160578 | Saxton et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3165452 | Williams | Jan 1965 | A |
| 3170781 | Keefer | Feb 1965 | A |
| 3174820 | See et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3215189 | Bauer | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3224855 | Plumat | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3226220 | Plumat | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3237929 | Plumat et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3239325 | Roberson et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3241548 | See et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3245769 | Eck et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3248205 | Dolf et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3248206 | Apple et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3260587 | Dolf et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
| 3268313 | Burgman et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3285834 | Guerrieri et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3294512 | Penberthy | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3325298 | Brown | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3375095 | Poole | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3380463 | Trethewey | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3385686 | Plumet et al. | May 1968 | A |
| 3402025 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
| 3407805 | Bougard | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3407862 | Mustin, Jr. | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3420510 | Griem | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3421873 | Burgman et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3421876 | Schmidt | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3432399 | Schutt | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3442633 | Perry | May 1969 | A |
| 3445214 | Oremesher | May 1969 | A |
| 3498779 | Hathaway | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3499743 | Fanica et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3510393 | Burgman et al. | May 1970 | A |
| 3519412 | Olink | Jul 1970 | A |
| 3525674 | Barnebey | Aug 1970 | A |
| 3533770 | Adler et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3547611 | Williams | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3563683 | Hess | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3573016 | Rees | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3592151 | Webber | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3592623 | Shepherd | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3600149 | Chen et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3606825 | Johnson | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3617234 | Hawkins et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3627504 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3632335 | Worner | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3649235 | Harris | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3692017 | Glachant et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3717139 | Guillet et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3738792 | Feng | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3741656 | Shapiro | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3741742 | Jennings | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3746527 | Knavish et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3747588 | Malmin | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3754879 | Phaneuf | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3756800 | Phaneuf | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3763915 | Perry et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3764287 | Brocious | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3771988 | Starr | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3788832 | Nesbitt | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3818893 | Kataoka et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3835909 | Douglas et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3840002 | Douglas et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3856496 | Nesbitt et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3885945 | Rees et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3907585 | Francel et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3913560 | Lazarre et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3929445 | Zippe | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3936290 | Cerutti et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3951635 | Rough | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3976464 | Wardiaw | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4001001 | Knavish et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4004903 | Daman et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4028083 | Patznick et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4083711 | Jensen | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4101304 | Marchand | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4110098 | Mattmuller | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4146373 | Sullivan | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4153438 | Stream | May 1979 | A |
| 4185982 | Schwenninger | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4203761 | Rose | May 1980 | A |
| 4205966 | Horikawa | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4208201 | Rueck | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4226564 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4238226 | Sanzenbacher et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4249927 | Fakuzaki et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4270740 | Sanzenbacher et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4282023 | Hammel et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4303435 | Sleighter | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4309204 | Brooks | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4316734 | Spinosa et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4323718 | Buhring et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4349376 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4360373 | Pecoraro | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4397692 | Ramge et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4398925 | Trinh et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4405351 | Sheinkop | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4406683 | Demarest | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4413882 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4424071 | Steitz et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4432780 | Propster et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4455762 | Saeman | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4461576 | King | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4488537 | Laurent | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4508970 | Ackerman | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4539034 | Hanneken | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4542106 | Sproull | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4545800 | Won et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4549896 | Streicher et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4599100 | Demarest | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4622007 | Gitman | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4626199 | Bounini | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4632687 | Kunkle et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4634461 | Demarest, Jr. et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4657586 | Masterson et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4718931 | Boettner | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4723708 | Berger et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4735642 | Jensen et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4738938 | Kunkle et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4758259 | Jensen | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4780122 | Schwenninger et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4794860 | Welton | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4798616 | Knavish et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4812372 | Kithany | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4814387 | Donat | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4816056 | Tsai et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4818265 | Krumwiede et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4877436 | Sheinkop | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877449 | Khinkis | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4878829 | Anderson | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4882736 | Pieper | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4886539 | Gerutti et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4900337 | Zortea et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4919700 | Pecoraro et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4927886 | Backderf et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4932035 | Pieper | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4953376 | Merlone | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4963731 | King | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4969942 | Schwenninger et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4973346 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5011086 | Sonnleitner | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5032230 | Shepherd | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5052874 | Johanson | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062789 | Gitman | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5097802 | Clawson | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5110285 | Snyder | May 1992 | A |
| 5168109 | Backderf et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5169424 | Grinnen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5194747 | Culpepper et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5199866 | Joshi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5204082 | Schendel | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5299929 | Yap | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5352258 | DeGreve | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5360171 | Yap | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374595 | Dumbaugh et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5405082 | Brown et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5412882 | Zippe et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5449286 | Snyder et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5473885 | Hunter, Jr. et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5483548 | Coble | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5490775 | Joshi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5522721 | Drogue et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5529594 | Wetmore | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5545031 | Joshi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5575637 | Slavejkov et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5586999 | Kobayashi | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5595703 | Swaelens et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5606965 | Panz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613994 | Muniz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5615668 | Panz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5636623 | Panz et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5672827 | Jursich | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5713668 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5718741 | Hull et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724901 | Guy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5736476 | Warzke et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5743723 | Iatrides et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5765964 | Calcote et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770309 | Houpt | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5814121 | Travis | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5829962 | Drasek et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833447 | Bodelin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5849058 | Takeshita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5863195 | Feldermann | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5887978 | Lunghofer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5944507 | Feldermann | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944864 | Hull et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5954498 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5975886 | Phillippe | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5979191 | Jian | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984667 | Phillippe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993203 | Koppang | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6029910 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6036480 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039787 | Edlinger | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044667 | Chenoweth | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6045353 | VonDrasek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6068468 | Phillipe et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6071116 | Phillipe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6074197 | Phillippe | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077072 | Marin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6085551 | Pieper et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6109062 | Richards | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6113389 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6116896 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120889 | Turner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123542 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6126438 | Joshi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6154481 | Sorg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156285 | Adams et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171100 | Joshi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178777 | Chenoweth | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183848 | Turner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6210151 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6210703 | Novich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6237369 | LeBlanc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241514 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6244197 | Coble | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6244857 | VonDrasek et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6247315 | Marin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6250136 | Igreja | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6250916 | Phillipe et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6274164 | Novich | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6276924 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6276928 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6293277 | Panz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6314760 | Chenoweth | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314896 | Marin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6318126 | Takei et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6332339 | Kawaguchi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6338337 | Panz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6339610 | Hoyer et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344747 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6357264 | Richards | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6386271 | Kawamoto et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6398547 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6404799 | Mori et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6418755 | Chenoweth | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6422041 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6454562 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6460376 | Jeanvoine et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470710 | Takei et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6536238 | Kawaguchi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6536651 | Ezumi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6558606 | Kulkarni et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6578779 | Dion | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6660106 | Babel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6694791 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6701617 | Li et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6701751 | Arechaga et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6705118 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6708527 | Ibarlucea et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711942 | Getman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6715319 | Barrow et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6722161 | LeBlanc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6736129 | Sjith | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6739152 | Jeanvoine et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6773256 | Joshi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6796147 | Borysowicz et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6797351 | Kulkarni et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6854290 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6857999 | Jeanvoine | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6883349 | Jeanvoine | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6918256 | Gutmark et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 7027467 | Baev et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7116888 | Aitken et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7134300 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7168395 | Engdahl | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7175423 | Pisano et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7231788 | Karetta et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7273583 | Rue et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7330634 | Aitken et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7383698 | Ichinose et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7392668 | Adams et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7428827 | Maugendre et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7441686 | Odajima et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7448231 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7454925 | DeAngelis et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7509819 | Baker et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7565819 | Jeanvoine | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7578988 | Jacques et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7581948 | Borders et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7622677 | Barberree et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7624595 | Jeanvoine et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7748592 | Koga et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7767606 | McGinnis et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7778290 | Sacks et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7781562 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7802452 | Borders et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7832365 | Hannum et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7845314 | Smith | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7855267 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7946136 | Watkinson | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8033254 | Hannum et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8079233 | Yoshida | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8279899 | Kitabayashi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8285411 | Hull et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8402787 | Pernode et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8424342 | Kiefer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8487262 | Damm et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8650914 | Charbonneau | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8707739 | Huber et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8707740 | Huber et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8769992 | Huber | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8875544 | Charbonneau | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8973400 | Charbonneau et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8973405 | Charbonneau et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8991215 | Shock et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8997525 | Shock et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9021838 | Charbonneau et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9032760 | Charbonneau et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9096452 | Charbonneau et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9096453 | Charbonneau | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 20010039813 | Simpson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020086077 | Noller et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124598 | Borysowicz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020134112 | Barrow et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152770 | Becher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162358 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166343 | LeBlanc | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030000250 | Arechaga et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015000 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030029197 | Jeanvoine et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037571 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20040025569 | Damm et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040065120 | Uchiyama | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040099009 | Linz et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128098 | Neuhaus et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131988 | Baker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040168474 | Jeanvoine et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224833 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050039491 | Maugendre | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050061030 | Ichinose et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050061036 | Mileo | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050083989 | Leister et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103323 | Engdahl | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223750 | Nutini | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236747 | Rue | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060000239 | Jeanvoine | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060101859 | Takagi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122450 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060144089 | Eichholz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060162387 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174655 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177785 | Varagani et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233512 | Aitken et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060257097 | Aitken et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287482 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293494 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293495 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070051136 | Watkinson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106054 | Crawford et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070122332 | Jacques | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130994 | Boratav et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070137259 | Borders et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070212546 | Jeanvoine et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220922 | Bauer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266737 | Rodek et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070278404 | Spanke et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080035078 | Li | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227615 | McGinnis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256981 | Jacques et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080276652 | Bauer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080293857 | Crawford et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080302136 | Bauer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090042709 | Jeanvoine et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090044568 | Lewis | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090120133 | Fraley et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090176639 | Jacques et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090220899 | Spangelo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235695 | Pierrot et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090320525 | Johnson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100064732 | Jeanvoine et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100087574 | Crawford et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100089383 | Cowles | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100120979 | Crawford et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100139325 | Watkinson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100143601 | Hawtof et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162757 | Brodie | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162772 | McGinnis | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100227971 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100236323 | D'Angelico et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100242543 | Ritter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100300153 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100304314 | Rouchy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100307196 | Richardson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100313604 | Watson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100319404 | Borders et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100326137 | Rouchy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110016922 | Kitamura et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110048125 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054091 | Crawford et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110061642 | Rouchy et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110088432 | Purnode et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110107670 | Galley et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110236846 | Rue et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110259057 | Gu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308280 | Huber | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120033792 | Kulik et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120077135 | Charbonneau | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120104306 | Kamiya et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120216567 | Boughton et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120216568 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120216576 | Boughton et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20130072371 | Jansen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086944 | Shock | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086949 | Charbonneau | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086950 | Huber et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086951 | Charbonneau et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086952 | Charbonneau | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130091900 | Yoshida | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123990 | Kulik et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130279532 | Ohmstede et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130283861 | Mobley et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130327092 | Charbonneau | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130333422 | McGinnis | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140090419 | Charbonneau | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140090421 | Shock et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140090422 | Charbonneau et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140090423 | Charbonneau et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140144185 | Shock et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20160116214 | Kirschen | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 254 502 | May 1948 | CH |
| 10 38 721 | Sep 1958 | DE |
| 11 05 116 | Apr 1961 | DE |
| 36 29 965 | Mar 1988 | DE |
| 40 00 358 | Mar 1993 | DE |
| 4 24 814 | Jan 1996 | DE |
| 196 19 919 | Aug 1997 | DE |
| 100 29 983 | Jan 2002 | DE |
| 100 29 983 | Sep 2003 | DE |
| 10 2005 033330 | Aug 2006 | DE |
| 0 181 248 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 1 337 789 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1 990 321 | Nov 2008 | EP |
| 2 133 315 | Dec 2009 | EP |
| 2 138 465 | Dec 2009 | EP |
| 1 986 966 | Apr 2010 | EP |
| 1 667 934 | Feb 2011 | EP |
| 2 397 446 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2 404 880 | Jan 2012 | EP |
| 2 433 911 | Mar 2012 | EP |
| 2 578 548 | Apr 2013 | EP |
| 2 740 860 | Sep 1997 | FR |
| 191301772 | Jan 1914 | GB |
| 191407633 | Jan 1914 | GB |
| 164073 | May 1921 | GB |
| 250 536 | Jul 1926 | GB |
| 959 895 | Jun 1964 | GB |
| 1449439 | Sep 1976 | GB |
| 1 514 317 | Jun 1978 | GB |
| 2 424 644 | Oct 2006 | GB |
| 1208172 | Jul 1989 | IT |
| S58 199728 | Nov 1983 | JP |
| H08 290918 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 2000 0050572 | Aug 2000 | KR |
| 100465272 | Dec 2004 | KR |
| 114827 | Jul 1999 | RO |
| 986873 | Jul 1983 | SU |
| 1998055411 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| 2008103291 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2009091558 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2010011701 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010045196 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2012048790 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012125665 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2013 162986 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013 188082 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2013188167 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Gamma Irradiators for Radiation Processing” Booklet, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. |
| Furman, BJ, ME 120 Experimental Methods Vibration Measurement, San Jose University Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. |
| Higley, BA, Glass Melter System Technologies for Vitrification of High-Sodium Content Low-Level, Radioactive, Liquid Wastes—Phase I: SBS Demonstration With Simulated Low-Level Waste—Final Test Report, Westinghouse Hanford Company. |
| Report for Treating Hanford LAW and WTP SW Simulants: Pilot Plant Mineralizing Flowsheet Apr. 2009, Department of Energy Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center by THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC. |
| Gerber, J., “Les Densimetres Industriels,” Petrole et Techniques, Association Francaise des Techniciens du Petrole, Jun. 1, 1989, pp. 26-27, No. 349, Paris, France. |
| Rue et al, “Submerged Combustion Melting of Glass,” International Journal of Applied Glass Science, Nov. 9, 2011, pp. 262-274, vol. 2, No. 4. |
| National Laboratory, US DOE Contract No. DE-AC09-08SR22470, Oct. 2011. |
| “AccuTru Temperature Measurement,” AccuTru International Corporation, 2003. |
| “Glass Technologies—The Legacy of a Successful Public-Private Partnership”, 2007, U.S. Department of Energy, pp. 1-32. |
| “Glass Melting Technology—A Technical and Economic Assessment,” 2004, U.S. Department of Energy, pp. 1-292. |
| Muijsenberg, H. P. H., Neff, G., Muller, J., Chmelar, J., Bodi, R. and Matustikj, F. (2008) “An Advanced Control System to Increase Glass Quality and Glass Production Yields Based on GS ESLLI Technology”, in a Collection of Papers Presented at the 66th Conference on Glass Problems: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, vol. 27, Issue 1 (ed W. M. Kriven), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. dol: 10.1002/9780470291306.ch3. |
| Rue, “Energy-Efficient Glass Melting—The Next Generation Melter”, Gas Technology Institute, Project No. 20621 Final Report (2008). |
| Muijsenberg, E., Eisenga, M. and Buchmayer, J. (2010) “Increase of Glass Production Efficiency and Energy Efficiency with Model-Based Predictive Control”, in 70th Conference on Glass Problems: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, vol. 31, Issue 1 (ed C. H. Drummond), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9780470769843.ch15. |
| Sims, Richard, “Batch charging technologies—a review”, www.glassonweh.com, Nikolaus Sorg Gmbh & Co KG (May 2011). |
| “Canty Process Technology” brochure, date unknown, copy received in Apr. 2012 at American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Spring Meeting, Houston, TX. |
| “Glass Melting”, Battelle PNNL MST Handbook, U.S. Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, retrieved from the Internet Apr. 20, 2012. |
| “Roll Compaction”, brochure from The Fitzpatrick Company, Elmhurst, Illinois, retrieved from the Internet Apr. 20, 2012. |
| “Glass industry of the Future”, United States Department of Energy, report 02-GA50113-03, pp. 1-17, Sep. 30, 2008. |
| Stevenson, “Foam Engineering: Fundamentals and Applications”, Chapter 16, pp. 336-389, John Wiley & Sons (Mar. 13, 2012). |
| Clare et al., “Density and Surface Tension of Borate Containing Silicate Melts”, Glass Technology—European Journal of Glass Science and Technology, Part A, pp. 59-62, vol. 44, No. 2, Apr. 1, 2003. |
| Seward, T.P., “Modeling of Glass Making Processes for Improved Efficiency”, DE-FG07-96EE41262, Final Report, Mar. 31, 2003. |
| Conradt et al, Foaming behavior on glass melts, Glastechniche Berichte 60 (1937) Nr. 6, S. 189-201 Abstract Fraunhofer ISC. |
| Kim et al., “Foaming in Glass Melts Produced by Sodium Sulfate Decomposition under Isothermal Conditions”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 74(3), pp. 551-555, 1991. |
| Kim et al., “Foaming in Glass Melts Produced by Sodium Sulfate Decomposition under Ramp Heating Conditions”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 75(11), pp. 2959-2963, 1992. |
| Kim et al., “Effect of Furnace Atmosphere on E-glass Foaming”, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 352(50/51), pp. 5287-5295, 2006. |
| Van Limpt et al., “Modelling the evaporation of boron species. Part 1. Alkali-free borosilicate glass melts”, Glass Technology—European Journal of Glass Science and Technology, Part A, 52(3): pp. 77-87, 2011. |
| Olabin, V.M. et al., “Submerged Combustion Furnace for Glass Melts,” Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Jan. 1, 1996, pp. 84-92, vol. 17—No. 2, American Ceramic Society Inc., US. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170008795 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13540771 | Jul 2012 | US |
| Child | 14686102 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14686102 | Apr 2015 | US |
| Child | 15272703 | US |
