Process variable transmitter with acceleration sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8898036
  • Patent Number
    8,898,036
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 6, 2007
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 25, 2014
    11 years ago
Abstract
A process variable transmitter for use in an industrial process control or monitoring system includes a transmitter housing and a process variable sensor having a sensor output related to a process variable. An accelerometer is coupled to the transmitter and provides an accelerometer output related to acceleration. Diagnostic circuitry provides a diagnostic output as a function of the sensor output and the accelerometer output.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to process variable transmitters. More specifically, the present invention relates to transmitters of the type which are used to control or monitor industrial processes.


Industrial processes are used in industrial manufacturing. There are various types of field devices which are used to monitor the process. For example, process variables such as pressure, flow, temperature and others can be sensed. In addition to using this information for monitoring the process, the process variables can be used to control the process.


Process variables are sensed using field devices known generally as process variable transmitters. In many instances, it is desirable to diagnose operation of the industrial process and identify the condition of the process and associated equipment. For example, diagnostics can be used to identify a failure in the industrial process, for example, so that failed components can be replaced. Other uses of diagnostics include identifying impending failure prior to its occurrence. This allows the component to be replaced or repaired at a desired time without necessarily shutting down the process.


Sensing vibrations is one method used for diagnosing process control devices. For example, a vibration sensor, such as an accelerometer, can be placed directly on a control device and can be used to sense vibration noise signals generated by the device. For example, the noise generated by a pump motor can be monitored. Vibrations are isolated and evaluated by identifying those which exceed an amplitude threshold or which have an abnormal frequency. This can be indicative of an actual or impending failure. Specific examples include sensors placed on a pump or a motor housing, discharge valves, or flanges associated with the control device. Another known diagnostic method is a manual inspection in which an operator listens for an abnormal sound from the control device. There is an ongoing need for improved diagnostic technology in industrial process control or monitoring systems for detecting failed components and components which have degraded or in the process of failing. Various techniques are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,005, filed Jul. 29, 2003 titled “Process Device Diagnostics Using Process Variable Sensor Signal; U.S. Publication No. 2005/0072239, published Apr. 7, 2005, titled “Process Device with Vibration Based Diagnostics” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,010,459, issued Mar. 7, 2006, titled “Process Device Diagnostics Using Process Variable Sensor Signal”.


SUMMARY

A process variable transmitter for use in an industrial process control or monitoring system includes a transmitter housing and a process variable sensor having a sensor output related to a process variable. An accelerometer is associated with the transmitter, such as for example, the transmitter housing, process variable sensor, or other component and provides an accelerometer output related to acceleration Diagnostic circuitry provides a diagnostic output as a function of the sensor output and the accelerometer output.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram of an industrial process including a process transmitter coupled to process piping.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of circuitry and components in the process transmitter of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a simplified block diagram of a process device for use in implementing the present invention.



FIG. 4 if a block diagram showing simplified steps in accordance with one configuration of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention provides a diagnostic technique for detecting a failure, or predicting an impending failure or reduction in performance of a process device or a process component prior to the occurrence of the failure or reduced performance. With the present invention, vibrations in the process and/or process device are monitored. Vibrations are detected and used to predict a failure, an impending failure, or reduced performance of the process device or process component as a function of the sensed vibration signal and further as a function of a sensed process variable.



FIG. 1 is a diagram of process control system 10 which includes a transmitter 12 connected to process pipe 16. Transmitter 12 is coupled to a two-wire process control loop 18 which operates in accordance with the Fieldbus, Profibus or HART® standard. However, the invention is not limited to these standards or a two-wire configuration. Two-wire process control loop 18 runs between transmitter 12 and the control room 20 and a portable configuration unit 26 is illustrated in an embodiment in which loop 18 operates in accordance with the HART® protocol loop 18 can carry a current I which is representative of a sensed process variable. Additionally, the HART® protocol allows a digital signal to be superimposed on the current through loop 18 such that digital information can be sent to or received from transmitter 12. When operating in accordance with the Fieldbus standard, loop 18 carries a digital signal and can be coupled to multiple field devices such as other transmitters. In one configuration, the loop 18 comprises a wireless loop and the transmitter 12 communicates without the need for additional wiring.


Process variables are typically the primary variables which are being controlled in a process. As used herein, process variable means any variable which describes the condition of the process such as, for example, pressure, flow, temperature, product level, pH, turbidity, vibration, position, motor current, any other characteristic of the process, etc. Control signal means any signal (other than a process variable) which is used to control the process. For example, control signal means a desired process variable value (i.e. a setpoint) such as a desired temperature, pressure, flow, product level, pH or turbidity, etch, which is adjusted by a controller or used to control the process. Additionally, a control signal means, calibration values, alarms, alarm conditions, the signal which is provided to a control element such as a valve position signal which is provided to a valve actuator, an energy level which is provided to a heating element, a solenoid on/off signal, etc., or any other signal which relates to control of the process. A diagnostic signal as used herein includes information related to operation of devices and elements in the process control loop, but does not include process variables or control signals. For example, diagnostic signals include valve stem position, applied torque or force, actuator pressure, pressure of a pressurized gas used to actuate a valve, electrical voltage, current, power, resistance, capacitance, inductance, device temperature, stiction, friction, full on and off positions, travel, frequency, amplitude, spectrum and spectral components, stiffness, electric or magnetic field strength, duration, intensity, motion, electric motor back emf, motor current; loop related parameters (such as control loop resistance, voltage, or current), or any other parameter which may be detected or measured in the system. Furthermore, process signal means any signal which is related to the process or element in the process such as, for example, a process variable, a control signal or a diagnostic signal. Process devices include any device which forms part of or couples to a process control loop and is used in the control or monitoring of a process.


It is understood that loop 18 is shown in one configuration and any appropriate process control loop may be used such as a 4-20 mA loop, 2, 3 or 4 wire loop, multi-drop loop and a loop operating in accordance with the HART®, Fieldbus or other digital or analog communication protocol including wireless communication protocols. In operation, transmitter 12 senses a process variable such as flow using sensor 21 and transmits the sensed process variable over loop 18.


In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a process device, such as transmitter 12 includes a vibration sensor configured to sense vibrations. The vibration sensor can be any type of vibration sensor such as an accelerometer but the invention is not limited to such a sensor. Diagnostic circuitry in transmitter 12, or at a remote location, monitors the sensed vibrations and a sensed process variable and is capable of diagnosing a failure or an impending failure. An output can be provided by transmitter 12, for example to control room 20 or communicator 26 over two-wire process control loop 18, which provides an indication of the failure of impending failure of a process component. Using this information, an operator can repair or replace a failed component, or repair or replace a component prior to its ultimate failure. This allows any maintenance of the process 10 to occur at a scheduled time or as desired. This can be particularly advantageous if the repair or replacement of the component requires the process 10 to be shut down. Further, some components can fail either catastrophically or in a manner which causes other components to be damaged, or cause the release of unsafe product to the environment. By providing an indication that the component may fail in the future, or predicting a time of ultimate failure, the component can be repaired or replaced prior to that ultimate failure.



FIG. 2 is a diagram showing process transmitter 12 coupled to process piping 16. Vibrations 70 are shown traveling through the industrial process. For example, the vibration 70 may be carried by process piping 16, process fluid within piping 16, or other physical couplings, to the transmitter 12.


Transmitter 12 includes a process variable sensor 72. Process variable sensor 72 can be configured to sense any type of process variable such as flow, pressure, temperature, or others. Process variable sensor 72 couples to measurement circuitry 74 which provides a process variable signal to I/O circuitry 76. I/O circuitry 76 is configured to transmit information related to the sensed process variable over two-wire process control loop 18. In some embodiments, I/O circuitry 76 can also receive power through process control loop 18 which is used to completely power the circuitry and components of transmitter 12. Measurement circuitry 74 also couples to diagnostic circuitry 82 and provides a signal related to the sensed process variable to cavity 82.


A vibration sensor 80 in transmitter 12 is configured to sense vibrations 70 and provide a vibration sensor signal to diagnostic circuitry 82. Diagnostic circuitry 82 monitors the vibrations 70 sensed by vibration sensor 80 along with the sensed process variable from sensor 72 provided by measurement circuitry 74 and provides an output via I/O circuitry 76 which provides an indication of a failure or impending failure of a process component. Alternatively, I/O circuitry can provide a status output indicating that the transmitter is working properly.


In some embodiments, the vibration diagnostics of the present invention can be used to avoid or reduce plant downtime by predicting the impending loss of a measurement instrument or of a control instrument while there is still time to replace or repair the device. Vibration information can also be provided to other devices which are in communication with process control loop 18. Data compression algorithms can be used for such transmissions. A diagnostic indication can be provided on two-wire process control loop 18. For example, a HART status, Field Bus data, or other alerts can be transmitted over loop 18. Such an alert can be provided to the control room 20.


The vibration sensor 80 can be any type of vibration sensor. Many vibration sensors operate along a single axis and are capable of only sensing vibrations along that axis. However, in one embodiment additional sensors, or multi-axis sensors, are employed to sense vibrations along more than a single axis, or to profile vibration at various locations in the process device. Additional sensed vibrations can be used by the diagnostic circuitry 82 to provide her diagnostics. Additionally, vibration sensors 80 can be placed in more than one location in the process transmitter 12. These additional sensors can also be used to provide additional vibration based process diagnostics, either along or in combination with a sensed process variable. The scope of the diagnostics can be expanded by comparing or analyzing vibration measurements, either alone or along with a sensed process variable, from more than one process device located in the process system. The additional measurements can be used to provide information related to the overall health of the process or plant. Vibration measurements made near the connection of a process device to the process can be used to detect specific process disruptions such as air hammer from abrupt valve closure, cavitation, aggressive chemical reactions or other process disturbances as well as actual or impending failure of pumps, rotating equipment or similar types of failures.


Although the I/O circuitry 76, measurement circuitry 74 and diagnostic circuitry 82 are shown as separate components in FIG. 2, these circuit blocks can be implemented in shared circuitry and/or software. For example, many of these functions can be implemented in a digital processor. In addition to comparing sensed vibrations, or cumulative sensed vibrations, in conjunction with a process variable, to a fixed threshold, other diagnostic techniques can be employed by diagnostic circuitry 82. For example, an expert system can be implemented using if/then rules for use in diagnosing operation based upon vibrations and a sensed process variable. Diagnostics can be based upon the frequency spectrum of sensed vibrations and process variables, and more complex processing can be employed such as neural networks, fuzzy logic, etc.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a process device 240 forming part of loop 18. Device 240 is shown generically and may comprise any process device used to implement the vibration diagnostics such as transmitter 12. Process device 240 includes I/O circuitry 242 coupled to loop 18 at terminals 244. Device 240 includes microprocessor 246, coupled to I/O circuitry 242, memory 248 coupled to microprocessor 246 and clock 250 coupled to microprocessor 246. Microprocessor 246 receives a process signal input 252. Process signal input block 252 signifies input of any process signal and the process signal input may be a process variable, or a control signal and may be received from loop 18 using I/O circuitry 242 or may be generated internally within process device 240.


Process device 240 includes a sensor input channel 254. Sensor input channel 254 includes sensor 21 which senses a process variable and provides a sensor output to amplifier 258 which has an output which is digitized by analog to digital converter 260. Channel 254 is typically used in transmitters such as transmitter 12. Compensation circuitry 262 compensates the digitized signal and provides a digitized process variable signal to microprocessor 246.


In one embodiment, I/O circuitry 242 provides a power output used to completely power some or all of the other circuitry in process device 240 using power received from loop 18. Typically, field devices such as transmitter 12, or controller 22 are powered from loop 18 while communicator 26 or control room 20 has a separate power source. As described above, process signal input 252 provides a process signal to microprocessor 246. The process signal may be a process variable from sensor 21, the control output provided to a control element, a diagnostic signal sensed by sensor 80, or a control signal, process variable or diagnostic signal received over loop 18, or a process signal received or generated by some other means, such as another I/O channel.


A user I/O circuit 276 is also connected to microprocessor 246 and provides communication between device 240 and a user. Typically, user I/O circuit 276 includes a display and/or audio for output, and a keypad or other interface for input. I/O circuit 276 can be used to allow a user to monitor or input process signals, such as process variables, control signals (setpoints, calibration values, alarms, alarm conditions, etc.).



FIG. 3 also illustrates vibration sensor 80 which can be an individual sensor, or it can comprise multiple sensors or components. In one embodiment, sensor 80 couples to microprocessor 246, for example, through an analog to digital converter 290 and an amplifier 292. Microprocessor 246 can monitor the sensed vibrations, along with a process signal such as a sense process variable, and provide an indication of a failure or impending failure of a process component. For example, the microprocessor can compare the relationship between the sensed vibration along with the process variable to a baseline value or a nominal value. Similarly, the process variable output can be compared to the sensed vibration to identify a faulty process variable reading. This information can be stored in memory 248. The baseline and nominal values can change based upon the mode of operation of the process, or other factors. The baseline can be a particular frequency spectrum or signature and can be based upon observed history of process operation. Further, the diagnostics performed by microprocessor 246 can be based upon trends in the sensed vibrations and sensed process variable. For example, an increase, either gradual or suddenly over time, or periodic spikes or other anomalies in the sensed vibrations and sensed process variable, can be an indication of a failure or an impending failure of a process component. Similarly, if the relationship between the sensed vibrations and sensed process variable suddenly changes, the microprocessor 246 can provide a diagnostic output indicating that a process component may fail or has failed. These values, trends, or training profiles can also be stored in memory 248. The diagnostics can be based upon a comparison, or more complex mathematical techniques such as observing averages or rolling averages of measurements, fuzzy logic techniques, neural network techniques, or expert system techniques based upon a series of rules and/or threshold comparison. In various embodiments, the ability of the present invention to provide predictive diagnostics can be advantageous as it provides time for service personnel to service the process component prior to its ultimate failure.



FIG. 3 also illustrates a striker 291 coupled to microprocessor 246. Striker 291 can be an optional component and can comprise any element which is configured to impart an acceleration to the transmitter 240. For example, a spring-loaded hammer can be activated by the microprocessor, a solonoid, a motor with an offset weight, etc. This can provide a known acceleration signal to the transmitter 240 and used for diagnostic or in configurations in which external acceleration sources are not available.


The diagnostic output of the present invention can be used to provide an output signal, provide a local indication to an operator, or provide a communication signal for transmission to a control room or other diagnostic annunciation.


As discussed above, the diagnostics are a function of techniques which employ a sensed vibration and a sensed process variable. For example, the diagnostics can utilize trends in the relations between the signals over a period of time. This information can be correlated, with respect to the process variable signal, with wear of bearings or pump components. Additionally, the diagnostics circuitry can be used to correlate vibration signals and sensed process variable with various procedures or occurrences which occur during operation of the industrial process. For example, an aggressive chemical reaction may have a particular vibration signature and a related change in the process variable. In some embodiments, the relationship between the sensed process variable and vibrations, for example a changing relationship between the two, can provide an indication of a diagnostic condition such as a component which is failing or otherwise changing in some manner.


In one aspect, the output from the vibration sensor is used to validate operation of the process variable sensor. For example, a vibration experienced by the pressure transmitter may be correlated to a change in the measured process variable. This relationship can be monitored over time and used to validate proper operation of the process variable sensor.


The vibration sensor 80 can be any appropriate vibration sensor. One known vibration detection and measurement sensor is an accelerometer. There are a number of different accelerometer technologies which are currently employed including capacitive, electrodynamic, piezoelectric, and others. The accelerometer produces an output signal that is related to the sensed vibration. The output signal can have a linear or other relationship to the strength of the vibration or the frequency of the vibration. Another example diagnostics sensor can be embodied in a MEMS configuration in which a cantilever is utilized to sense vibrations.


Piezoelectric accelerometers are relatively rugged and have a wide signal bandwidth, in the order of tens of kilohertz, covering much of the audio range. One example sensor is available from PCB Piezoelectronics and identified as the IMI Sensor Series 660, which is a family of low cost embeddable accelerometers. Various configurations are available including two wire with and without signal processing and three wire low power. For example, the low power configuration operates over an extended temperature range and can be mounted directly to processes which undergo a wide temperature variation. An excitation voltage is applied, for example between 3 and 5 volts DC and the current throughout the sensor is on the order of 750 microamperes.


Another example accelerometer is the MMA series available from Motorola. These accelerometers include various configurations such as surface mount integrated circuit packages, temperature compensation, integral signal conditioning and filtering, self testing and fault latch capabilities. These accelerometers use a capacitive sensing technique that can be modeled as two stationary plates with a movable plate placed therebetween. The center plate is deflected from its rest position when the system is subject to acceleration.


Any of appropriate type of accelerometer may be used with the present invention. For example, a capacitive accelerometer uses a metal beam or micromachine feature which produces a variable capacitance which changes in response to acceleration. A piezoelectric electric sensor uses a piezoelectric monitor mounted to the device. Acceleration is related to a voltage output from the piezoelectric crystal. A piezo resistant sensor can, for example, use a beam or micromachine feature having a resistance which changes in response to acceleration. A hall defect sensor uses a configuration in which motion is converted to an electrical signal by sensing a change in magnetic fields. Various types of tri-access accelerometers can be used. For example, one such accelerometer is the Okidata ML8950. Another example device is available from analog devices as the AVXL330.


Using a tri-access accelerometer, a transmitter in accordance with the present invention can be configured to utilize two separate measurements for diagnostics. The transmitter can utilize the output from the accelerometer as well as the output from the process variable sensor, such as a pressure sensor. The signals from these two devices can be compared to generate unique system diagnostics. For example, in a pressure transmitter, an accelerometer can be incorporated. The accelerometer can be activated using a manual input, such as being struck with a hammer or other heavy object by an operator. The impact can be directed along an axis of a sensored diaphragm of a pressure sensor. This uncalibrated impact will cause both the accelerometer to measure acceleration and the pressure sensor to measure a pressure pulse. If both outputs are detected, diagnostics can confirm proper operation of the device.


As a further embodiment of the configurations described above, the waveforms or other aspects of the output of the process variable sensor and the accelerometer can be compared. For example, in some configurations, a linear relationship can be observed between the output from the pressure sensor and the output from the accelerometer in response to a strike or other impact on the transmitter. A variation of these responses can provide an indication of a failure, for example, a loss of oil fill fluid.


In one example, a spring-loaded punch is used to provide a calibrated strike to the device. However, any desired type of calibrated strike can be used. In such a configuration, the magnitude of the strike can be used in a diagnostic algorithm along with the outputs from the process variable sensor and the accelerometer. In a further configuration, multiple calibrated strikes are applied for use in the diagnostics. For example, strikes of differing magnitudes can be used and the resultant changes in the process variable and the output from the accelerometer can be compared.


In another example configuration, ambient energy is used as the source of the “strike”. For example, a water hammer effect, pump pulsation or machinery vibrations can be used. For example, two different water hammers can result in two different comparisons that can used as a calibration check. It can also provide an indication that the transmitters are functioning in accordance with performance specifications.


In another example, a constant vibration causes an offset in the sensor process variable such as an offset in a sensed pressure. For example, a vibration in a wet leg which couples a pressure sensor to a process causes the pressure sensor to indicate an increased pressure. In some configurations, the pressure sensor acts as a low pass filter and rectifier such that the pulsation appears as a pressure offset. The process variable, along with the monitored acceleration, can be used to perform diagnostics. Further, the monitored acceleration can also be used to compensate the process variable such that the offset caused by the vibrations are removed from the process variable measurements using, for example, microprocessor 246 shown in FIG. 3.


The accelerometer 80 can be mounted in any appropriate location. The accelerometer can be mounted to the housing of the transmitter, or, for example, directly to the process variable sensor such as directly to a pressure sensor. However, the pressure sensor is typically isolated in a pressure module and, in some configurations, may be isolated from vibrations such as strikes applied to the transmitter. The housing and placement of the accelerometer can be designed to enhance the susceptibility to particular types of vibrations, or other considerations. High speed data capturing techniques can be utilized in order to obtain a detailed profile of acceleration sensed by the acceleration sensor.



FIG. 4 is a simplified block diagram 300 of steps in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Flow chart 300 is initiated at block 302 and the process variable is monitored at block 304. At block 306 acceleration is monitored. Blocks 304 and 306 can occur sequentially, in parallel, in reverse order or at any time including partially overlapping monitor periods. At block 308, diagnostics are performed as a function of the monitored process variable as well as monitored acceleration. These diagnostics can be performed in microprocessor 246 shown in FIG. 3 based upon programming instructions stored in memory 248. Diagnostics can be in accordance with any appropriate technique in which the two monitored values are compared in order to determine a condition, or impending condition, of process components, operation of the process, operation of devices or elements within the process, etc. Examples include rule based techniques, fuzzy logic techniques, neural network techniques, artificial intelligence techniques or others. In one configuration, the monitored acceleration is used by microprocessor 246 to compensate for errors in the measured process variable which are introduced due to acceleration of the transmitter or components coupled to the transmitter. For example, a offset in the sensed process variable can be removed in some configurations by the use of monitored acceleration. At block 310, an optional output is provided related to the diagnostics. This output can be transmitted to a remote location as desired, for example, by communicating over two-wire process control loop 18, or using other communication techniques such as RF or wireless techniques. Additionally, the output can be provided locally to an operator or locally to nearby equipment such as test equipment either through a wired or a wireless connection. At block 312, the procedure stops and is optionally repeated by returning to block 302. In one configuration, monitor acceleration block 306 includes activating a striker 391, or other acceleration source.


In one configuration, the steps illustrated in FIG. 4 can be activated based upon user input. For example, an operator can initiate operation of block diagram 300 by providing an appropriate signal to transmitter 340 either through communication using two-wire process control loop 18 or other techniques. In such a configuration, the device can be configured to instruct the operator to apply acceleration to the transmitter 240 at block 306 while the acceleration is monitored. For example, an operator can be instructed to strike the transmitter at a particular location or along a particular axis.


The present invention provides a number of techniques for performing diagnostics or compensation in a process device of a process control monitoring system. For example, external influences, either artificial, such as a hammer strike, or ambient, such as a water hammer or machinery vibration, which causes acceleration of the device, can be measured using an accelerometer. The effect of this acceleration is measured using an accelerometer, for example, a single axis, a dual axis, or a tri-axis accelerometer and a process variable sensor such as a pressure sensor. These two measurements can be used to diagnose operation, for example, to verify proper operation of the transmitter. In other configurations, the two measured signals are manipulated, for example, the ratios of the two signals can be observed and compared with the magnitude of calibrated external influence in order to verify transmitter operation. Using a ratio of the two signals along with the magnitude of the two signals, and the magnitude of an external influence along with ratios of the magnitude of the external influence, further techniques can be used to verify operation of the transmitter. In addition to verification of operation, calibration and compensation can be performed in a real time using the acceleration signal. By monitoring and analyzing signals, the transmitter can provide a notification or alert regarding status. The accelerometer can be positioned as desired, for example, fabricated adjacent the process variable sensor such as pressure sensor, or electronics associated with the sensor. For example, a capacitance based accelerometer can be integrated in an existing or modified analog to digital converter such as a capacitance to digital integrated circuit. The tri-axis accelerometer can be used to perform multiple functions including measurement of vibration as a diagnostic tool, measurement of inclination of the device as a means for automatically compensate head effects in pressure measurements, measurement of an influence on the device compared to its influence on the process variable sensor for use in transmitted verification, and/or measurement of acceleration to compensate for acceleration pressure offsets. A source of acceleration can be integrated into the device such as a spring-loaded punch mechanism or the like. The mechanism can be actuated by an operator, or it can be automatically actuated by electrical circuitry in the transmitter. In another configuration, a mechanical or pressure external influence integrated into the process connection which couples the transmitter to the industrial process. The accelerometer can be attached directly to the process variable sensor to create a more predictable relationship between the two signals.


In one configuration, the accelerometer can be configured to measure a time based periodicity of the acceleration input. If the acceleration affects process variable measurement, such as pressure measurement, accuracy, then measurements which are taken during “quiet” intervals can be considered as providing higher accuracy. Such a system could, for example, hold the most recent “good” value when the accelerometer measures a large acceleration input which may cause an error in the measurement. In another example, in some configurations, an increase in the measured process variable, for example, an increase in a flow rate, also corresponds to an increase in vibrations, for example, increased pump pulsations or higher magnitude pipe vibrations. The signals from the process variable “pressure” sensor in the accelerometer can be compared as an additional diagnostic to provide more confidence in the measured process variable.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In some embodiments, the invention can be embodied in any type of process device. Any type of processor can be used including capacitive based accelerometer using a metal beam or micro machine feature which produces a changed capacitance related to acceleration, piezoelectric sensors using a crystal mounted to a mass, piezoelectric sensors, for example, in which a beam has a resistance which changes based upon acceleration, Hall effect based sensors which are based upon changing magnetic fields, etc. The diagnostic circuitry of the present invention can be embodied in any appropriate component. For example, the circuitry can be embodied in a microprocessor and associated components along with programming instructions or can comprise other components or embodiments. Example acceleration sensors include capacitive, electrodynamic, piezoelectric and Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS).

Claims
  • 1. A process variable transmitter for use in an industrial process control or monitoring system, comprising: a process variable sensor in the process variable transmitter having a process variable sensor output related to a process variable;an accelerometer in the process variable transmitter and which is separate from the process variable sensor coupled to the transmitter having an accelerometer output related to acceleration;output circuitry configured to provide an output related to the sensed process variable; anddiagnostic circuitry configured to: determine a ratio between the process variable output and the accelerometer output;diagnose a condition in the process based upon the ratio of the process variable sensor output and the accelerometer output and responsively provide a diagnostic output indicative of a diagnostic condition in the process.
  • 2. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 including a transmitter housing wherein the accelerometer is coupled to the transmitter housing.
  • 3. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the accelerometer is adjacent the process variable sensor.
  • 4. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the accelerometer comprises a tri-axis accelerometer.
  • 5. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the process variable sensor comprises a pressure sensor.
  • 6. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 including communication circuitry configured to couple to a process control loop.
  • 7. The process variable transmitter of claim 6 wherein the diagnostic output from the diagnostic circuitry is transmitted on the process control loop.
  • 8. The process variable transmitter of claim 6 wherein the diagnostic output is related to failure of a process component.
  • 9. The process variable transmitter of claim 6 wherein the diagnostic output is related to degradation in performance of a process component.
  • 10. The process variable transmitter of claim 6 wherein the diagnostic output is related to an impending failure of a process component.
  • 11. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic output is used to compensate the process variable.
  • 12. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic output is based upon rules.
  • 13. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic circuitry implements a neural network, or fuzzy logic.
  • 14. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the acceleration sensor is selected from a group of acceleration sensors including of capacitive, electrodynamic, piezoelectric and Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS).
  • 15. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic circuitry is configured to control an acceleration applied to the process control transmitter.
  • 16. The process variable transmitter of claim 15 including a striker configured to impact the transmitter.
  • 17. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the accelerometer is configured to sense an acceleration applied by an operator.
  • 18. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the accelerometer is configured to sense a calibrated acceleration applied to the transmitter.
  • 19. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic circuitry is configured to compare acceleration from more than one calibrated accelerations applied to the transmitter.
  • 20. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the process variable transmitter is configured to control an output of the process variable based upon sensed acceleration.
  • 21. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the accelerometer is configured to sense an ambient acceleration.
  • 22. The process variable transmitter of claim 21 wherein the ambient acceleration is from at least one of a water hammer, pump pulsation and machinery acceleration.
  • 23. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic circuitry is configured to compensate the output from the process variable based upon a sensed static acceleration.
  • 24. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the accelerometer provides an output for use in one of diagnostics, process variable compensation, or verification of operation.
  • 25. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 including a memory configured to store the process variable and wherein the process variable transmitter provides an output based upon the process variable stored in the memory as a function of sensed acceleration.
  • 26. The process variable transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic output is a function of a historical relationship between the sensory output and the accelerometer output.
  • 27. A method of diagnosing a condition in an industrial process using a process variable transmitter in an industrial process control system, comprising: sensing accelerations applied to the transmitter using an accelerometer located in the transmitter and providing an accelerometer output;measuring a process variable with a process variable sensor separate from the accelerometer and located in the transmitter and providing a process variable sensor output;providing an output related to the sensed pressure variable;determining a ratio of the process variable sensor output and the accelerometer output;diagnosing a condition of the industrial process based upon the ratio of the process variable sensor output and the accelerometer output.
  • 28. The method of claim 27 wherein the accelerometer is coupled to a transmitter housing.
  • 29. The method of claim 27 wherein the accelerometer is adjacent a process variable sensor.
  • 30. The method of claim 27 wherein the accelerometer comprises a tri-axis accelerometer.
  • 31. The method of claim 27 wherein the sensed process variable comprises pressure.
  • 32. The method of claim 27 including transmitting diagnostic information on a process control loop.
  • 33. The method of claim 27 wherein the diagnosed operation is related to an impending failure of a process component.
  • 34. The method of claim 27 including compensating the process variable based upon the step of diagnosing.
  • 35. The method of claim 27 wherein the diagnosing is based upon rules.
  • 36. The method of claim 27 wherein the diagnosing is based upon a neural network, or fuzzy logic.
  • 37. The method of claim 27 wherein the acceleration sensor is selected from a group of acceleration sensors including of capacitive, electrodynamic, piezoelectric and Micro-Electro -Mechanical Systems (MEMS).
  • 38. The method of claim 27 including controlling an acceleration applied to the transmitter.
  • 39. The method of claim 27 including sensing an acceleration applied by an operator.
  • 40. The method of claim 27 including sensing a calibrated acceleration applied to the transmitter.
  • 41. The method of claim 27 including storing the process variable and wherein providing an output based upon the stored process variable as a function of sensed acceleration.
US Referenced Citations (537)
Number Name Date Kind
2533339 Willenborg Dec 1950 A
3012432 Moore et al. Dec 1961 A
3096434 King Jul 1963 A
3218863 Calvert Nov 1965 A
3232712 Stearns Feb 1966 A
3249833 Vosteen May 1966 A
3374112 Danon Mar 1968 A
3404264 Kugler Oct 1968 A
3410779 Whitehead et al. Nov 1968 A
3468164 Sutherland Sep 1969 A
3557621 Ferran Jan 1971 A
3590370 Fleischer Jun 1971 A
3618592 Stewart Nov 1971 A
3633053 Peters Jan 1972 A
3688190 Blum Aug 1972 A
3691842 Akeley Sep 1972 A
3697835 Satori Oct 1972 A
3701280 Stroman Oct 1972 A
3808480 Johnston Apr 1974 A
3849637 Caruso et al. Nov 1974 A
3855858 Cushing Dec 1974 A
3924069 Fletcher et al. Dec 1975 A
3924219 Braun Dec 1975 A
3948098 Richardson et al. Apr 1976 A
3952759 Ottenstein Apr 1976 A
3964296 Matzuk Jun 1976 A
3973184 Raber Aug 1976 A
4008619 Alcaide et al. Feb 1977 A
4043008 Weiss et al. Aug 1977 A
RE29383 Gallatin et al. Sep 1977 E
4058975 Gilbert et al. Nov 1977 A
4083031 Pharo, Jr. Apr 1978 A
4099413 Ohte et al. Jul 1978 A
4102199 Talpouras Jul 1978 A
4122719 Carlson et al. Oct 1978 A
4158217 Bell Jun 1979 A
4168518 Lee Sep 1979 A
4177496 Bell et al. Dec 1979 A
4227419 Park Oct 1980 A
4237454 Meyer Dec 1980 A
4249164 Tivy Feb 1981 A
4250490 Dahlke Feb 1981 A
4255964 Morison Mar 1981 A
4279013 Dahlke Jul 1981 A
4287553 Braunlich Sep 1981 A
4292769 Maag et al. Oct 1981 A
4322775 Delatorre Mar 1982 A
4336567 Anastasia Jun 1982 A
4337516 Murphy et al. Jun 1982 A
4355536 McShane et al. Oct 1982 A
4358814 Lee et al. Nov 1982 A
4370890 Frick Feb 1983 A
4383443 Langdon May 1983 A
4389895 Rud, Jr. Jun 1983 A
4390321 Langlois et al. Jun 1983 A
4393711 Lapides Jul 1983 A
4399824 Davidson Aug 1983 A
4417312 Cronin et al. Nov 1983 A
4422125 Antonazzi et al. Dec 1983 A
4422335 Ohnesorge et al. Dec 1983 A
4423634 Audenard et al. Jan 1984 A
4434451 Delatorre Feb 1984 A
4446741 Sirokorad et al. May 1984 A
4448062 Peterson et al. May 1984 A
4455874 Paros Jun 1984 A
4458537 Bell et al. Jul 1984 A
4459858 Marsh Jul 1984 A
4463612 Thompson Aug 1984 A
4490773 Moffatt Dec 1984 A
4517468 Kemper et al. May 1985 A
4528869 Kubo et al. Jul 1985 A
4530234 Cullick et al. Jul 1985 A
4536753 Parker Aug 1985 A
4540468 Genco et al. Sep 1985 A
4542436 Carusillo Sep 1985 A
4562742 Bell Jan 1986 A
4571689 Hildebrand et al. Feb 1986 A
4630265 Sexton Dec 1986 A
4635214 Kasai et al. Jan 1987 A
4641529 Lorenzi et al. Feb 1987 A
4642782 Kemper et al. Feb 1987 A
4644479 Kemper et al. Feb 1987 A
4649515 Thompson et al. Mar 1987 A
4668473 Agarwal May 1987 A
4670733 Bell Jun 1987 A
4686638 Furuse Aug 1987 A
4696191 Claytor et al. Sep 1987 A
4705212 Miller et al. Nov 1987 A
4707796 Calabro et al. Nov 1987 A
4720806 Schippers et al. Jan 1988 A
4736367 Wroblewski et al. Apr 1988 A
4736763 Britton et al. Apr 1988 A
4758308 Carr Jul 1988 A
4777585 Kokawa et al. Oct 1988 A
4785669 Benson et al. Nov 1988 A
4807151 Citron Feb 1989 A
4818994 Orth et al. Apr 1989 A
4831564 Suga May 1989 A
4833922 Frick et al. May 1989 A
4841286 Kummer Jun 1989 A
4853693 Eaton-Williams Aug 1989 A
4860232 Lee et al. Aug 1989 A
4866628 Natarajan Sep 1989 A
4873655 Kondraske Oct 1989 A
4875369 Delatorre Oct 1989 A
4878012 Schulte et al. Oct 1989 A
4895031 Cage Jan 1990 A
4907167 Skeirik Mar 1990 A
4924418 Bachman et al. May 1990 A
4926364 Brotherton May 1990 A
4926674 Fossum et al. May 1990 A
4934196 Romano Jun 1990 A
4939753 Olson Jul 1990 A
4951174 Grantham et al. Aug 1990 A
4964125 Kim Oct 1990 A
4977480 Nishihara Dec 1990 A
4979125 Kwun et al. Dec 1990 A
4988990 Warrior Jan 1991 A
4992965 Holter et al. Feb 1991 A
5005142 Lipchak et al. Apr 1991 A
5014543 Franklin et al. May 1991 A
5015949 Koch et al. May 1991 A
5019760 Chu et al. May 1991 A
5025344 Maly et al. Jun 1991 A
5043862 Takahashi et al. Aug 1991 A
5047990 Gafos et al. Sep 1991 A
5051743 Orszulak Sep 1991 A
5053815 Wendell Oct 1991 A
5057774 Verhelst et al. Oct 1991 A
5067099 McCown et al. Nov 1991 A
5081598 Bellows et al. Jan 1992 A
5089979 McEachern et al. Feb 1992 A
5089984 Struger et al. Feb 1992 A
5094109 Dean et al. Mar 1992 A
5098197 Shepard et al. Mar 1992 A
5099436 McCown et al. Mar 1992 A
5103409 Shimizu et al. Apr 1992 A
5111531 Grayson et al. May 1992 A
5121467 Skeirik Jun 1992 A
5122794 Warrior Jun 1992 A
5122976 Bellows et al. Jun 1992 A
5130936 Sheppard et al. Jul 1992 A
5134574 Beaverstock et al. Jul 1992 A
5137370 McCullock et al. Aug 1992 A
5142612 Skeirik Aug 1992 A
5143452 Maxedon et al. Sep 1992 A
5148378 Shibayama et al. Sep 1992 A
5150289 Badavas Sep 1992 A
5167009 Skeirik Nov 1992 A
5168419 Delatorre Dec 1992 A
5175678 Frerichs et al. Dec 1992 A
5189624 Barlow et al. Feb 1993 A
5193143 Kaemmerer et al. Mar 1993 A
5194819 Briefer Mar 1993 A
5195098 Johnson et al. Mar 1993 A
5197114 Skeirik Mar 1993 A
5197328 Fitzgerald Mar 1993 A
5212765 Skeirik May 1993 A
5214582 Gray May 1993 A
5216226 Miyoshi Jun 1993 A
5216612 Cornett et al. Jun 1993 A
5224203 Skeirik Jun 1993 A
5228780 Shepard et al. Jul 1993 A
5230250 Delatorre Jul 1993 A
5233875 Obermeier et al. Aug 1993 A
5235527 Ogawa et al. Aug 1993 A
5265031 Malczewski Nov 1993 A
5265222 Nishiya et al. Nov 1993 A
5267241 Kowal Nov 1993 A
5269311 Kirchner et al. Dec 1993 A
5274572 O'Neill et al. Dec 1993 A
5282131 Rudd et al. Jan 1994 A
5282261 Skeirik Jan 1994 A
5293585 Morita Mar 1994 A
5303181 Stockton Apr 1994 A
5305230 Matsumoto et al. Apr 1994 A
5311421 Nomura et al. May 1994 A
5317520 Castle May 1994 A
5327357 Feinstein et al. Jul 1994 A
5329818 Frick et al. Jul 1994 A
5333240 Matsumoto et al. Jul 1994 A
5340271 Freeman et al. Aug 1994 A
5347843 Orr et al. Sep 1994 A
5349541 Alexandro, Jr. et al. Sep 1994 A
5351199 Ticcioni et al. Sep 1994 A
5357449 Oh Oct 1994 A
5361628 Marko et al. Nov 1994 A
5365423 Chand Nov 1994 A
5365787 Hernandez et al. Nov 1994 A
5367612 Bozich et al. Nov 1994 A
5369674 Yokose et al. Nov 1994 A
5372041 Yoshida et al. Dec 1994 A
5384699 Levy et al. Jan 1995 A
5386373 Keeler et al. Jan 1995 A
5388465 Okaniwa et al. Feb 1995 A
5392293 Hsue Feb 1995 A
5394341 Kepner Feb 1995 A
5394543 Hill et al. Feb 1995 A
5404064 Mermelstein et al. Apr 1995 A
5408406 Mathur et al. Apr 1995 A
5408586 Skeirik Apr 1995 A
5410495 Ramamurthi Apr 1995 A
5414645 Hirano May 1995 A
5419197 Ogi et al. May 1995 A
5430642 Nakajima et al. Jul 1995 A
5434774 Seberger Jul 1995 A
5436705 Raj Jul 1995 A
5440478 Fisher et al. Aug 1995 A
5442639 Crowder et al. Aug 1995 A
5444820 Tzes et al. Aug 1995 A
5467355 Umeda et al. Nov 1995 A
5469070 Koluvek Nov 1995 A
5469156 Kogura Nov 1995 A
5469735 Watanabe Nov 1995 A
5469749 Shimada et al. Nov 1995 A
5471884 Czarnocki et al. Dec 1995 A
5481199 Anderson et al. Jan 1996 A
5481200 Voegele et al. Jan 1996 A
5483387 Bauhahn et al. Jan 1996 A
5485753 Burns et al. Jan 1996 A
5486996 Samad et al. Jan 1996 A
5488697 Kaemmerer et al. Jan 1996 A
5489831 Harris Feb 1996 A
5492016 Pinto et al. Feb 1996 A
5495769 Broden et al. Mar 1996 A
5497661 Stripf et al. Mar 1996 A
5510799 Maltby et al. Apr 1996 A
5511004 Dubost et al. Apr 1996 A
RE35269 Comerford Jun 1996 E
5526293 Mozumder et al. Jun 1996 A
5537335 Antaki et al. Jul 1996 A
5539638 Keeler et al. Jul 1996 A
5542300 Lee Aug 1996 A
5548528 Keeler et al. Aug 1996 A
5549137 Lenz et al. Aug 1996 A
5551306 Scarpa Sep 1996 A
5555190 Derby et al. Sep 1996 A
5560246 Bottinger et al. Oct 1996 A
5561599 Lu Oct 1996 A
5570034 Needham et al. Oct 1996 A
5570300 Henry et al. Oct 1996 A
5572420 Lu Nov 1996 A
5572438 Ehlers et al. Nov 1996 A
5573032 Lenz et al. Nov 1996 A
5578763 Spencer et al. Nov 1996 A
5591922 Segeral et al. Jan 1997 A
5598521 Kilgore et al. Jan 1997 A
5600148 Cole et al. Feb 1997 A
5600791 Carlson et al. Feb 1997 A
5608650 McClendon et al. Mar 1997 A
5623605 Keshav et al. Apr 1997 A
5629870 Farag et al. May 1997 A
5633809 Wissenbach et al. May 1997 A
5637802 Frick et al. Jun 1997 A
5640491 Bhat et al. Jun 1997 A
5642301 Warrior et al. Jun 1997 A
5644240 Brugger Jul 1997 A
5650943 Powell et al. Jul 1997 A
5654869 Ohi et al. Aug 1997 A
5661668 Yemini et al. Aug 1997 A
5665899 Willcox Sep 1997 A
5668322 Broden Sep 1997 A
5669713 Schwartz et al. Sep 1997 A
5671335 Davis et al. Sep 1997 A
5672247 Pangalos et al. Sep 1997 A
5675504 Serodes et al. Oct 1997 A
5675724 Beal et al. Oct 1997 A
5680109 Lowe et al. Oct 1997 A
5682317 Keeler et al. Oct 1997 A
5682476 Tapperson et al. Oct 1997 A
5700090 Eryurek Dec 1997 A
5703575 Kirkpatrick Dec 1997 A
5704011 Hansen et al. Dec 1997 A
5705754 Keita et al. Jan 1998 A
5705978 Frick et al. Jan 1998 A
5708211 Jepson et al. Jan 1998 A
5708585 Kushion Jan 1998 A
5710370 Shanahan et al. Jan 1998 A
5710708 Wiegland Jan 1998 A
5713668 Lunghofer et al. Feb 1998 A
5719378 Jackson, Jr. et al. Feb 1998 A
5731522 Sittler Mar 1998 A
5734975 Zele et al. Mar 1998 A
5736649 Kawasaki et al. Apr 1998 A
5741074 Wang et al. Apr 1998 A
5742845 Wagner Apr 1998 A
5746511 Eryurek et al. May 1998 A
5747701 Marsh et al. May 1998 A
5748883 Carlson et al. May 1998 A
5752008 Bowling May 1998 A
5754451 Williams May 1998 A
5756898 Diatschenko et al. May 1998 A
5757608 Bernot et al. May 1998 A
5764539 Rani Jun 1998 A
5764891 Warrior Jun 1998 A
5781024 Blomberg et al. Jul 1998 A
5781878 Mizoguchi et al. Jul 1998 A
5790413 Bartusiak et al. Aug 1998 A
5796006 Bellet et al. Aug 1998 A
5801689 Huntsman Sep 1998 A
5805442 Crater et al. Sep 1998 A
5817950 Wiklund et al. Oct 1998 A
5825664 Warrior et al. Oct 1998 A
5828567 Eryurek et al. Oct 1998 A
5829876 Schwartz et al. Nov 1998 A
5848383 Yuuns Dec 1998 A
5854993 Crichnik Dec 1998 A
5854994 Canada et al. Dec 1998 A
5859964 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5869772 Storer Feb 1999 A
5874676 Maki, Jr. Feb 1999 A
5876122 Eryurek Mar 1999 A
5880376 Sai et al. Mar 1999 A
5887978 Lunghofer et al. Mar 1999 A
5900801 Heagle et al. May 1999 A
5908990 Cummings Jun 1999 A
5911162 Denner Jun 1999 A
5912499 Diem et al. Jun 1999 A
5920016 Broden Jul 1999 A
5923557 Eidson Jul 1999 A
5924086 Mathur et al. Jul 1999 A
5926778 Pöppel Jul 1999 A
5934371 Bussear et al. Aug 1999 A
5936514 Anderson et al. Aug 1999 A
5940013 Vladimir et al. Aug 1999 A
5940290 Dixon Aug 1999 A
5956663 Eryurek et al. Sep 1999 A
5965819 Piety et al. Oct 1999 A
5970430 Burns et al. Oct 1999 A
5992240 Tsuruoka et al. Nov 1999 A
5995910 Discenzo Nov 1999 A
6002952 Diab et al. Dec 1999 A
6006338 Longsdorf et al. Dec 1999 A
6014612 Larson et al. Jan 2000 A
6014902 Lewis et al. Jan 2000 A
6016523 Zimmerman et al. Jan 2000 A
6016706 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2000 A
6017143 Eryurek et al. Jan 2000 A
6023399 Kogure Feb 2000 A
6026352 Burns et al. Feb 2000 A
6038579 Sekine Mar 2000 A
6041287 Dister et al. Mar 2000 A
6045260 Schwartz et al. Apr 2000 A
6046642 Brayton et al. Apr 2000 A
6047220 Eryurek et al. Apr 2000 A
6047222 Burns et al. Apr 2000 A
6052655 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2000 A
6059254 Sundet et al. May 2000 A
6061603 Papadopoulos et al. May 2000 A
6069560 Larsson May 2000 A
6072150 Sheffer Jun 2000 A
6094600 Sharpe, Jr. et al. Jul 2000 A
6104875 Gallagher et al. Aug 2000 A
6112131 Ghorashi et al. Aug 2000 A
6119047 Eryurek et al. Sep 2000 A
6119529 Di Marco et al. Sep 2000 A
6139180 Usher et al. Oct 2000 A
6151560 Jones Nov 2000 A
6179964 Begemann et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182501 Furuse et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192281 Brown et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195591 Nixon et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199018 Quist et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209048 Wolff Mar 2001 B1
6236096 Chang et al. May 2001 B1
6236948 Eck et al. May 2001 B1
6237424 Salmasi et al. May 2001 B1
6260004 Hays et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263487 Stripf et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272438 Cunningham et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289735 Dister et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295875 Frick et al. Oct 2001 B1
6298377 Hartikainen et al. Oct 2001 B1
6298454 Schleiss et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304828 Swanick et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307483 Westfield et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311136 Henry et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317701 Pyostsia et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327914 Dutton Dec 2001 B1
6330005 Tonelli et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330525 Hays et al. Dec 2001 B1
6347252 Behr et al. Feb 2002 B1
6356191 Kirkpatrick et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360277 Ruckley et al. Mar 2002 B1
6367328 Gorman et al. Apr 2002 B1
6370448 Eryurek et al. Apr 2002 B1
6370879 Stalder et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377859 Brown et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378364 Pelletier et al. Apr 2002 B1
6396426 Balard et al. May 2002 B1
6397114 Eryurek et al. May 2002 B1
6405099 Nagai et al. Jun 2002 B1
6425038 Sprecher Jul 2002 B1
6434504 Eryurek et al. Aug 2002 B1
6447459 Larom Sep 2002 B1
6449574 Eryurek et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473656 Langels et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473710 Eryurek Oct 2002 B1
6480793 Martin Nov 2002 B1
6492921 Kunitani et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493689 Kotoulas et al. Dec 2002 B2
6496814 Busche Dec 2002 B1
6497222 Bolz et al. Dec 2002 B2
6505517 Eryurek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519546 Eryurek et al. Feb 2003 B1
6530259 Kelly et al. Mar 2003 B1
6532392 Eryurek et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539267 Eryurek et al. Mar 2003 B1
6546814 Choe et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556145 Kirkpatrick et al. Apr 2003 B1
6561038 Gravel et al. May 2003 B2
6564268 Davis et al. May 2003 B1
6567006 Lander et al. May 2003 B1
6584847 Hirose Jul 2003 B1
6594603 Eryurek et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597997 Tingley Jul 2003 B2
6601005 Eryurek et al. Jul 2003 B1
6611775 Coursolle et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615149 Wehrs Sep 2003 B1
6633782 Schleiss et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637267 Fiebelkorn et al. Oct 2003 B2
6654697 Eryurek et al. Nov 2003 B1
6662120 Drahm et al. Dec 2003 B2
6701274 Eryurek et al. Mar 2004 B1
6722185 Lawson et al. Apr 2004 B2
6727812 Sauler et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735549 Ridolfo May 2004 B2
6738388 Stevenson et al. May 2004 B1
6751560 Tingley et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754601 Eryurek et al. Jun 2004 B1
6758168 Koskinen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6785592 Smith et al. Aug 2004 B1
6854028 Smith Feb 2005 B2
6859755 Eryurek et al. Feb 2005 B2
6880403 Shimada et al. Apr 2005 B1
6892317 Sampath et al. May 2005 B1
6904476 Hedtke Jun 2005 B2
6907383 Eryurek et al. Jun 2005 B2
6915364 Christensen et al. Jul 2005 B1
6920789 Sakai Jul 2005 B2
6951133 Passarelli Oct 2005 B2
6970003 Rome et al. Nov 2005 B2
6976503 Ens et al. Dec 2005 B2
6993445 Clarke et al. Jan 2006 B2
7010459 Eryurek et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013185 Simon Mar 2006 B2
7018800 Huisenga et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023205 Krupp Apr 2006 B1
7035773 Keyes et al. Apr 2006 B2
7036381 Broden et al. May 2006 B2
7040179 Drahm et al. May 2006 B2
7058542 Hauhia et al. Jun 2006 B2
7085610 Eryurek et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099852 Unsworth et al. Aug 2006 B2
7109883 Trimble et al. Sep 2006 B2
7114516 Ito Oct 2006 B2
7137307 Huybrechts et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143007 Long et al. Nov 2006 B2
7171281 Weber et al. Jan 2007 B2
7206646 Nixon et al. Apr 2007 B2
7254518 Eryurek et al. Aug 2007 B2
7258021 Broden Aug 2007 B2
7258024 Dimarco et al. Aug 2007 B2
7262693 Karschnia et al. Aug 2007 B2
7290450 Brown et al. Nov 2007 B2
7321846 Huiseng et al. Jan 2008 B1
7406387 Hashizume et al. Jul 2008 B2
7435581 West Oct 2008 B2
7502744 Garrow et al. Mar 2009 B2
7523667 Brown et al. Apr 2009 B2
7528737 Hedtke et al. May 2009 B2
7577543 Brahmajosyula et al. Aug 2009 B2
7627441 Longsdorf et al. Dec 2009 B2
7680549 Kavaklioglu et al. Mar 2010 B2
7702478 Hedtke et al. Apr 2010 B2
7821437 Rud et al. Oct 2010 B1
7827988 Matthews et al. Nov 2010 B2
7913566 Hedtke Mar 2011 B2
7940189 Brown May 2011 B2
8311778 Bronczyk et al. Nov 2012 B2
20020013629 Nixon et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020029808 Friend et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032544 Reid et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020055790 Havekost May 2002 A1
20020077711 Nixon et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077782 Fruehling et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078752 Braunling et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020121910 Rome et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020130846 Nixon et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020145515 Snowbarger et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020145568 Winter Oct 2002 A1
20020148644 Schultz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163427 Eryurek et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194547 Christenson et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030014536 Christensen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030033040 Billings Feb 2003 A1
20030045962 Eryurek et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030083953 Starkey May 2003 A1
20030158803 Darken et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040024568 Eryurek et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040025593 Hashimoto et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040064203 Bornside et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093174 Lander May 2004 A1
20040128034 Lenker et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167750 Pagnano et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040186927 Eryurek et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199361 Lu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249583 Eryurek et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050011278 Brown et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050055137 Andren et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050072239 Longsdorf et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050132808 Brown et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149570 Sasaki et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168343 Longsdorf et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050284237 Henry et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060075009 Lenz et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060087402 Manning et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060127183 Bishop Jun 2006 A1
20060212139 Hedtke et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229931 Fligler et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060277000 Wehrs Dec 2006 A1
20070010967 Scherr Jan 2007 A1
20070010968 Longsdorf et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070168057 Blevins et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070266020 Case et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080033693 Andenna et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080082294 Pihlaja et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103629 Milanovic et al. May 2008 A1
20080110459 Farbarik May 2008 A1
20080208538 Visser et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090121790 Brown et al. May 2009 A1
20090309574 Goupil Dec 2009 A1
20100011869 Klosinski Jan 2010 A1
20100138066 Kong Jun 2010 A1
20100211443 Carrel et al. Aug 2010 A1
20120041704 Rovner et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120051399 Rud et al. Mar 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (144)
Number Date Country
999950 Nov 1976 CA
1185841 Jun 1998 CN
1 257 179 Jun 2000 CN
1346435 Apr 2002 CN
32 13 866 Oct 1983 DE
3340834 May 1985 DE
35 03 597 Jul 1986 DE
35 03 597 Jul 1986 DE
35 40 204 Sep 1986 DE
40 08 560 Sep 1990 DE
43 43 747 Jun 1994 DE
44 33 593 Jun 1995 DE
195 02 499 Aug 1996 DE
296 00 609 Mar 1997 DE
197 04 694 Aug 1997 DE
19930660 Jul 1999 DE
199 05 071 Aug 2000 DE
19905071 Aug 2000 DE
299 17 651 Dec 2000 DE
199 47 129 Apr 2001 DE
100 36 971 Feb 2002 DE
102 23 725 Apr 2003 DE
0 122 622 Oct 1984 EP
0 413 814 Feb 1991 EP
0 511 553 Apr 1992 EP
0 487 419 May 1992 EP
0 512 794 Nov 1992 EP
0 524 550 Jan 1993 EP
0 594 227 Apr 1994 EP
0 624 847 Nov 1994 EP
0 644 470 Mar 1995 EP
0 697 586 Feb 1996 EP
0 697 586 Feb 1996 EP
0 749 057 Dec 1996 EP
0 825 506 Jul 1997 EP
0 827 096 Sep 1997 EP
0 838 768 Sep 1997 EP
1 022 626 Oct 1997 EP
0 807 804 Nov 1997 EP
0 827 096 Mar 1998 EP
1 058 093 May 1999 EP
0 335 957 Nov 1999 EP
0 965 897 Dec 1999 EP
1 022 626 Jul 2000 EP
2 302 514 Sep 1976 FR
2 334 827 Jul 1977 FR
928704 Jun 1963 GB
1 534 280 Nov 1978 GB
1 534 288 Nov 1978 GB
2 310 346 Aug 1997 GB
2 317 969 Apr 1998 GB
2 342 453 Apr 2000 GB
2 347 232 Aug 2000 GB
56-031573 Mar 1981 JP
57196619 Feb 1982 JP
58-129316 Aug 1983 JP
59-116811 Jul 1984 JP
59-163520 Sep 1984 JP
59-176643 Oct 1984 JP
59-211196 Nov 1984 JP
59-211896 Nov 1984 JP
60-000507 Jan 1985 JP
60-76619 May 1985 JP
60-131495 Jul 1985 JP
60-174915 Sep 1985 JP
62-30915 Feb 1987 JP
62-080535 Apr 1987 JP
62-50901 Sep 1987 JP
63-169532 Jul 1988 JP
64-01914 Jan 1989 JP
64-72699 Mar 1989 JP
11-87430 Jul 1989 JP
2-05105 Jan 1990 JP
3-118424 May 1991 JP
3-229124 Oct 1991 JP
4-70906 Mar 1992 JP
05-60596 Mar 1993 JP
5-122768 May 1993 JP
5-164781 Jun 1993 JP
6-95882 Apr 1994 JP
06242192 Sep 1994 JP
06-248224 Oct 1994 JP
7-063586 Mar 1995 JP
07234988 Sep 1995 JP
8-054923 Feb 1996 JP
8-102241 Apr 1996 JP
08-114638 May 1996 JP
8-136386 May 1996 JP
8-166309 Jun 1996 JP
8-247076 Sep 1996 JP
8-313466 Nov 1996 JP
9054611 Feb 1997 JP
2712625 Oct 1997 JP
2712701 Oct 1997 JP
2753592 Mar 1998 JP
07225530 May 1998 JP
10-232170 Sep 1998 JP
11-083575 Mar 1999 JP
11-505922 May 1999 JP
3139597 Dec 2000 JP
2002-538420 Nov 2002 JP
2003-503784 Jan 2003 JP
2004021712 Jan 2004 JP
2004034112 Feb 2004 JP
2004-186445 Jul 2004 JP
2005-048638 Feb 2005 JP
09-005092 Feb 2007 JP
2007-040763 Feb 2007 JP
2007-507712 Mar 2007 JP
2008-513879 May 2008 JP
2080647 May 1997 RU
2121105 Oct 1998 RU
2190267 Sep 2002 RU
901676 Jan 1982 SU
WO 9425933 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9523361 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9611389 Apr 1996 WO
WO 9612993 May 1996 WO
WO 9639617 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9721157 Jun 1997 WO
WO 9725603 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9806024 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9813677 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9814855 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9820469 May 1998 WO
WO 9839718 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9919782 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9953286 Oct 1999 WO
WO 0041050 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0050851 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0055700 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0070531 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0101213 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0119440 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0177766 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0190704 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0227418 Apr 2002 WO
WO 03081002 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2004044666 May 2004 WO
WO 2004048898 Jun 2004 WO
2005010522 Feb 2005 WO
2005033639 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2007100280 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2008039993 Apr 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (187)
Entry
Awawdeh et al., Wireless Sensing of Flow-Induced Vibrations for Pipeline Integrity Monitoring, 2006 IEEE, pp. 114-117.
Pittard et al., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Flow Induced Pipe Vibration in Fully Developed Flow, Jul. 2004, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 75, No. 7, pp. 2393-2401.
Damiano et al., Current Applications of Vibration Monitoring and Neutron Noise Analysis, Feb. 1990, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 39 pp.
Reimche et al., Basics of Vibration Monitoring for Fault Detection and Process Control, Jun. 2-6, 2003, PANNDT 2003, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 10 pp.
Hodkiewicz et al., The Effect of Change in Flow Rate on the Vibration of Double-Suction Centrifugal Pumps, 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, vol. 216, Part E, pp. 47-58.
“A TCP\IP Tutorial” by, Socolofsky et al., Spider Systems Limited, Jan. 1991 pp. 1-23.
“Approval Standards for Explosionproof Electrical Equipment General Requirements”, Factory Mutual Research, Cl. No. 3615, Mar. 1989, pp. 1-34.
“Approval Standard Intrinsically Safe Apparatus and Associated Apparatus for Use in Class I, II, and III, Division 1 Hazardous (Classified) Locations”, Factory Mutual Research, Cl. No. 3610, Oct. 1988, pp. 1-70.
“Automation On-line” by, Phillips et al., Plant Services, Jul. 1997, pp. 41-45.
“Climb to New Heights by Controlling your PLCs Over the Internet” by, Phillips et al., Intech, Aug. 1998, pp. 50-51.
“Ethernet emerges as viable, inexpensive fieldbus”, Paul G. Schreier, Personal Engineering, Dec. 1997, p. 23-29.
“Ethernet Rules Closed-loop System” by, Eidson et al., Intech, Jun. 1998, pp. 39-42.
“Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 2: Physical Layer Specification and Service Definition”, ISA-S50.02-1992, pp. 1-93.
“Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 3: Data Link Service Definition”, ISA-S50.02-1997, Part 3, Aug. 1997, pp. 1-159.
Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 4: Data Link Protocol Specification, ISA-S50.02-1997, Part 4, Aug. 1997, pp. 1-148.
“Fieldbus Support for Process Analysis” by, Blevins et al., Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., 1995, pp. 121-128.
“Fieldbus Technical Overview Understanding FOUNDATION™ fieldbus technology”, Fisher-Rosemount, 1998, pp. 1-23.
“Hypertext Transfer Protocol—Http/1.0” by, Berners-Lee et al., MIT/LCS, May 1996, pp. 1-54.
“Infranets, Intranets, and the Internet” by, Pradip Madan, Echelon Corp, Sensors, Mar. 1997, pp. 46-50.
“Internet Protocol Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification” by, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, RFC 791, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-43.
“Introduction to Emit”, emWare, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-22.
“Introduction to the Internet Protocols” by, Charles L. Hedrick, Computer Science Facilities Group, Rutgers University, Oct. 3, 1988, pp. 1-97.
“Is There a Future for Ethernet in Industrial Control?”, Miclot et al., Plant Engineering, Oct. 1988, pp. 44-46, 48, 50.
LFM/SIMA Internet Remote Diagnostics Research Project Summary Report, Stanford University, Jan. 23, 1997, pp. 1-6.
“Managing Devices with the Web” by, Howard et al., Byte, Sep. 1997, pp. 45-64.
“PC Software Gets Its Edge From Windows, Components, and the Internet”, Wayne Labs, I&Cs, Mar. 1997, pp. 23-32.
Proceedings Sensor Expo, Aneheim, California, Produced by Expocon Managemnet Associates, Inc., Apr. 1996, pp. 9-21.
Proceedings Sensor Expo, Boston, Massachuttes, Produced by Expocon Management Associates, Inc., May 1997, pp. 1-416.
“Smart Sensor Network of the Future” by, Jay Warrior, Sensors, Mar. 1997, pp. 40-45.
“The Embedded Web Site” by, John R. Hines, IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 1996, p. 23.
“Transmission Control Protocol: Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification” Information Sciences Institute, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-69.
“On-Line Statistical Process Control for a Glass Tank Ingredient Scale,” by R.A. Weisman, IFAC real Time Programming, 1985, pp. 29-38.
“The Performance of Control Charts for Monitoring Process Variation,” by C. Lowry et al., Commun. Statis.-Simula., 1995, pp. 409-437.
“A Knowledge-Based Approach for Detection and Diagnosis of Out-of-Control Events in Manufacturing Processes,” by P. Love et al., IEEE, 1989, pp. 736-741.
“Advanced Engine Diagnostics Using Universal Process Modeling”, by P. O'Sullivan, Presented at the 1996 SAE Conference on Future Transportation Technology, pp. 1-9.
“Programmable Hardware Architectures for Sensor Validation”, by M.P. Henry et al., Control Eng. Practice, vol. 4, No. 10., pp. 1339-1354, (1996).
“Sensor Validation for Power Plants Using Adaptive Backpropagation Neural Network,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 37, No. 2, by E. Eryurek et al. Apr. 1990, pp. 1040-1047.
“Smart Temperature Measurement in the '90s”, by T. Kerlin et al., C& I, (1990).
“Software-Based Fault-Tolerant Control Design for Improved Power Plant Operation,” IEEE/IFAC Joint Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design, Mar. 7-9, 1994, pp. 585-590.
A Standard Interface for Self-Validating Sensors, by M.P. Henry et al., Report No. QUEL 1884/91, (1991).
“Taking Full Advantage of Smart Transmitter Technology Now,” by G. Orrison, Control Engineering, vol. 42, No. 1, Jan. 1995.
“Application of Neural Networks for Sensor Validationand Plant Monitoring,” by B. Upadhyaya et al., Nuclear Engineering, vol. 97, No. 2, Feb. 1992 pp. 170-176.
“Automated Generation of Nonlinear System Characterization for Sensor Failure Detection,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., ISA, 1989 pp. 269-274.
“In Situ Calibration of Nuclear Plant Platinum Resistance Thermometers Using Johnson Noise Methods,” EPRI, Jun. 1983.
“Johnson Noise Thermometer for High Radiation and High-Temperature Environments,” by L. Oakes et al., Fifth Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1988, pp. 2-23.
“Development of a Resistance Thermometer For Use Up to 1600° C.”, by M.J. de Groot et al., CAL LAB, Jul./Aug. 1996, pp. 38-41.
“Survey, Applications, and Prospects of Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by T. Blalock et al., Electrical Engineering Department, 1981 pp. 2-11.
“Noise Thermometry for Industrial and Metrological Applications at KFA Julich,” by H. Brixy et al., 7th International Symposium on Temperature, 1992.
“Johnson Noise Power Thermometer and its Application in Process Temperature Measurement,” by T.V. Blalock et al., American Institute of Physics 1982, pp. 1249-1259.
“Field-based Architecture is Based on Open Systems, Improves Plant Performance”, by P. Cleaveland, I&CS, Aug. 1996, pp. 73-74.
“Tuned-Circuit Dual-Mode Johnson Noise Thermometers,” by R.L. Shepard et al., Apr. 1992.
“Tuned-Circuit Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by Michael Roberts et al., 7th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1990.
“Smart Field Devices Provide New Process Data, Increase System Flexibility,” by Mark Boland, I&CS, Nov. 1994, pp. 45-51.
“Wavelet Analysis of Vibration, Part I: Theory,” by D.E. Newland, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 116, Oct. 1994, pp. 409-416.
“Wavelet Analysis of Vibration, Part 2: Wavelet Maps,” by D.E. Newland, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 116, Oct. 1994, pp. 417-425.
“Development of a Long-Life, High-Reliability Remotely Operated Johnson Noise Thermometer,” by R.L. Shepard et al., ISA, 1991, pp. 77-84.
“Application of Johnson Noise Thermometry to Space Nuclear Reactors,” by M.J. Roberts et al., Presented at the 6th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 9-12, 1989.
“A Decade of Progress in High Temperature Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by T.V. Blalock et al., American Institute of Physics, 1982 pp. 1219-1223.
“Sensor and Device Diagnostics for Predictive and Proactive Maintenance”, by B. Boynton, A Paper Presented at the Electric Power Research Institute—Fossil Plant Maintenance Conference in Baltimore, Maryland, Jul. 29-Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 50-1-50-6.
“Detection of Hot Spots in Thin Metal Films Using an Ultra Sensitive Dual Channel Noise Measurement System,” by G.H. Massiha et al., Energy and Information Technologies in the Southeast, vol. 3 of 3, Apr. 1989, pp. 1310-1314.
“Detecting Blockage in Process Connections of Differential Pressure Transmitters”, by E. Taya et al., SICE, 1995, pp. 1605-1608.
“Development and Application of Neural Network Algorithms for Process Diagnostics,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Decision and Control, 1990, pp. 3277-3282.
“A Fault-Tolerant Interface for Self-Validating Sensors”, by M.P. Henry, Colloquium, pp. 3/1-3/2 (Nov. 1990).
“Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network Applications to Fault Diagnosis”, by P. Frank et al., International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, (1997), pp. 68-88.
“Keynote Paper: Hardware Compilation—A New Technique for Rapid Prototyping of Digital Systems—Applied to Sensor Validation”, by M.P. Henry, Control Eng. Practice, vol. 3, No. 7., pp. 907-924, (1995).
“The Implications of Digital Communications on Sensor Validation”, by M. Henry et al., Report No. QUEL 1912/92, (1992).
“In-Situ Response Time Testing of Thermocouples”, ISA, by H.M. Hashemian et al., Paper No. 89-0056, pp. 587-593, (1989).
“An Integrated Architecture for Signal Validation in Power Plants,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Third IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug. 24-26, 1988, pp. 1-6.
“Integration of Multiple Signal Validation Modules for Sensor Monitoring,” by B. Upadhyaya et al., Department of Nuclear Engineering, Jul. 8, 1990, pp. 1-6.
“Intelligent Behaviour for Self-Validating Sensors”, by M.P. Henry, Advances in Measurement, pp. 1-7, (May 1990).
“Measurement of the Temperature Fluctuation in a Resistor Generating 1/F Fluctuation,” by S. Hashiguchi, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 22, No. 5, Part 2, May 1983, pp. L284-L286.
“Check of Semiconductor Thermal Resistance Elements by the Method of Noise Thermometry”, by A. B. Kisilevskii et al., Measurement Techniques, vol. 25, No. 3, Mar. 1982, New York, USA, pp. 244-246.
“Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plant Monitoring,” by B. Upadhyaya, International Fast Reactor Safety Meeting, Aug. 12-16, 1990, pp. 2-10.
“Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plantwide Monitoring,” by E. Eryurek, 1992.
“A New Method of Johnson Noise Thermometry”, by C.J. Borkowski et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 45, No. 2, (Feb. 1974) pp. 151-162.
“Thermocouple Continuity Checker,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 1954 (Oct. 1977).
“A Self-Validating Thermocouple,” Janice C-Y et al., IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 239-253 (Mar. 1997).
Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Chapter IV entitled “Temperature Measurements,” by T.J Claggett, pp. 266-333 (1982).
“emWare's Releases EMIT 3.0, Allowing Manufacturers to Internet and Network Enable Devices Royalty Free,” 3 pages, PR Newswire (Nov. 4, 1998).
Warrior, J., “The IEEE P1451.1 Object Model Network Independent Interfaces for Sensors and Actuators,” pp. 1-14, Rosemount Inc. (1997).
Warrior, J., “The Collision Between the Web and Plant Floor Automation,” 6th. WWW Conference Workshop on Embedded Web Technology, Santa Clara, CA (Apr. 7, 1997).
“Internal Statistical Quality Control for Quality Monitoring Instruments”, by P. Girling et al., ISA, 15 pgs., 1999.
“Statistical Process Control (Practice Guide Series Book)”, Instrument Society of America, 1995, pp. 1-58 and 169-204.
“Time-Frequency Analysis of Transient Pressure Signals for a Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation Study,” ASIAO Journal, by Alex A. Yu et al., vol. 44, No. 5, pp. M475-M479, (Sep.-Oct. 1998)
“Caviation in Pumps, Pipes and Valves,” Process Engineering, by Dr. Ronald Young, pp. 47 and 49 (Jan. 1990).
“Quantification of Heart Valve Cavitation Based on High Fidelity Pressure Measurements,” Advances in Bioengineering 1994, by Laura A. Garrison et al., BED-vol. 28, pp. 297-298 (Nov. 6-11, 1994).
“Monitoring and Diagnosis of Cavitation in Pumps and Valves Using the Wigner Distribution,” Hydroaccoustic Facilities, Instrumentation, and Experimental Techniques, NCA-vol. 10, pp. 31-36 (1991).
“Developing Predictive Models for Cavitation Erosion,” Codes and Standards in a Global Environment, PVP-vol. 259, pp. 189-192 (1993).
“Self-Diagnosing Intelligent Motors: A Key Enabler for Next Generation Manufacturing System,” by Fred M. Discenzo et al., pp. 3/1-3/4 (1999).
“A Microcomputer-Based Instrument for Applications in Platinum Resistance Thermomety,” by H. Rosemary Taylor and Hector A. Navarro, Journal of Physics E. Scientific Instrument, vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 1100-1104 (1983).
“Experience in Using Estelle for the Specification and Verification of a Fieldbus Protocol: FIP,” by Barretto et al., Computer Networking, pp. 295-304 (1990).
“Computer Simulation of H1 Field Bus Transmission,” by Utsumi et al., Advances in Instrumentation and Control, vol. 46, Part 2, pp. 1815-1827 (1991).
“Progress in Fieldbus Developments for Measuring and Control Application,” by A. Schwaier, Sensor and Acuators, pp. 115-119 (1991).
“Ein Emulationssystem zur Leistungsanalyse von Feldbussystemen, Teil 1,” by R. Hoyer, pp. 335-336 (1991).
“Simulatore Integrato: Controllo su bus di campo,” by Barabino et al., Automazione e Strumentazione, pp. 85-91 (Oct. 1993).
“Ein Modulares, verteiltes Diagnose-Expertensystem für die Fehlerdiagnose in lokalen Netzen,” by Jürgen M. Schröder, pp. 557-565 (1990).
“Fault Diagnosis of Fieldbus Systems,” by Jürgen Quade, pp. 577-581 (Oct. 1992).
“Ziele und Anwendungen von Feldbussystemen,” by T. Pfeifer et al., pp. 549-557 (Oct. 1987).
“Profibus Infrastructure Measures,” by Tilo Pfeifer et al., pp. 416-419 (Aug. 1991).
“Simulation the Time Behaviour of Fieldbus Systems,” by O. Schnelle, pp. 440-442 (1991).
“Field Bus Networks for Automation Systems Containing Intelligent Functional Unites,” by W. Kriesel et al., pp. 486-489 (1987).
“Field Buses for Process Interconnection with Digital Control Systems,” Tecnología, pp. 141-147 (1990).
“Decentralised Systems with Real-Time Field Bus,” Netzwerke, Jg. Nr.3 v. 14.3, 4 pages (1990).
“Process Measurement and Analysis,” by Liptak et al., Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Third Edition, pp. 528-530, (1995).
“Improving Dynamic Performance of Temperature Sensors With Fuzzy Control Techniques,” by Wang Lei et al., pp. 872-873 (1992).
“Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary” 2nd Edition, 1994, Microsoft Press. p. 156.
International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US01/40791 with international filing date of May 22, 2001.
International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US01/40782 with international filing date of May 22, 2001.
International Search Report from Application No. PCT/02/14560 with international filing date of May 8, 2002.
International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US02/14934 with international filing date of May 8, 2002.
“On-Line Tool Condition Monitoring System With Wavelet Fuzzy Neural Network,” by Li Xiaoli et al., pp. 271-276 (1997).
“Optimal Design of the Coils of An Electromagnetic Flow Meter,” by Michalski, A. et al., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 34, Issue 5, Part 1, pp. 2563-2566 (1998).
“Magnetic Fluid Flow Meter for Gases,” Popa, N. C., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 30, Issue 2, Part 1-2, pp. 936-938 (1993).
“New Approach to a Main Error Estimation for Primary Transducer of Electromagnetic Flow Meter,” by Michalski, A., IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 1093-1097 (1998).
“Additional Information From Flowmeters Via Signal Analysis,” by Amadi-Echendu, J.E. et al., IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Record, vol. 7, pp. 187-193 (1990).
International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US02/06606 with international filing date of Mar. 5, 2002.
International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US02/30465 with international filing date of Sep. 25, 2002.
“What is a weighted moving average?”, Dau Stat Refresher, http://cne.gmu.edu/modules/dau/stat/mvavgs/wma—bdy.html. (1995).
“Statistics Glossary: Time Series Data”, by Easton et al., http://www.stats.gla.ac.uk/steps/glossary/time—series.html , Sep. 1997.
“The Indicators Story”, Sustainable Seattle, pp. 55-59, 1998.
“Detecting Regimes in Temperature Time Series”, by Clemins et al., Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering, Proceedings, pp. 727-732, 2001.
“Re: Digital Filter-Moving Average”, The Math Forumn, http://mathforum.org/discuss/sci.math/a/t/177212, Sep. 28, 1998.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, or the Declaration for PCT/US2004/017300.
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fees” for PCT/US2004/031678.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration”, PCT/US2004/025291.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration”, PCT/US2004/031678.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration”, PCT/US2005/011385.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patenatability”, PCT/US2004/031678.
“Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion”, PCT/US2004/022736.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report”, PCT/US00/14798.
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fees”, PCT/US2004/031678.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion”, PCT/US2004/022736.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report” PCT/US00/14798.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/439,095.
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial Search Report” for PCT/US2007/0011428, dated Oct. 8, 2008.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration” for PCT/US2008/009394 filed Aug. 5, 2008; 13 pages.
Eryurek et al., “Advanced Diagnostics Achieved with Intelligent Sensors and Fieldbus”, 2001, Measuremnet and Control vol. 34, p. 293-311.
First Office Action from corresponding Chinese Application No. 200780035735.6, dated Mar. 15, 2011, 4 pages.
Rezabek, John “Field Device Complications”, InTech, Apr. 1, 2006, HighBeam Research Online database, www.highbeam.com, 2 pages.
First Office Action from corresponding Chinese Application No. 200880102161.4, dated Jul. 6, 2011, 20 pages.
First Office Action from corresponding Russian Application No. 2010108301, dated Apr. 29, 2011, 16 pages.
Office Action from European Application No. 07836452.8, Dated Jun. 6, 2011.
Office Action from corresponding Japanese Application No. 2009-524611, dated Jul. 26, 2011, 7 pages.
Reeves-T., “Optimizing Process Equipment Performance”, 2005, Emerson Process Management, 5 pages.
PlantWeb, “Improving Availability” Emerson White Paper, 2003, 15 pages.
PlantWeb, “Reducing Operations & Maintenance Costs”, 2003, 18 pages.
Office Action from corresponding European Application No. 08795030.9, Dated Nov. 4, 2011.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/017301, dated Apr. 11, 2008, 4 pages.
Written Opinion for International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/017301, dated Apr. 11, 2008, 7 pages.
Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/012317, dated Dec. 17, 2007, 11 pages.
Office Action (English translation) from Chinese Application No. 200780030039.6, dated Dec. 1, 2010, 8 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for corresponding European Application No. 07 838 659.6-2206, dated Nov. 18, 2011, 7 pages.
Chinese Office Action (English translation) for corresponding Chinese Application No. 200780030039.6, dated Nov. 25, 2011, 8 pages.
Japanese Office Action (with English translation) for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2010-519967, dated Feb. 7, 2012, 11 pages.
Second Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880102161.4, dated May 3, 2012, 6 pages.
Canadian Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,694,936, dated Oct. 16, 2012, 6 pages.
Rejection Decision from Chinese patent application No. 2007800357356, dated Mar. 28, 2012, 6 pages.
Second Office Action from Japanese patent application No. 2009530377, dated May 22, 2012, 5 pages.
Rejection Decision from Chinese patent application No. 2010-519967, dated Aug. 9, 2012, 9 pages.
Summons to attend oral proceeding from the corresponding European Patent Application No. 07838659.6, dated Jan. 29, 2013.
Decision of Rejection for European Patent Application No. 07838659.6, dated Jul. 3, 2013, 11 pages.
Reexamination Notification for Chinese Patent Application No. 2007800357356, dated May 3, 2013, 4 pages.
Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009530377, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 2 pages.
Summons to attend Oral Proceeding for European Patent Application No. 07838659.6, dated Jan. 29, 2013, 6 pages.
“Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion”, PCT/US2006/037535, May 10, 2007.
“Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion”, PCT/US2007/012317, Dec. 17, 2007.
Samson, Technical Information; HART Communication, Part 4 Communications; 40 pp, 1999.
“A Supervision Support System for Industrial Processes” by J. Penalva et al., IEEE, Oct. 1993, pp. 57-65.
“International Search Report” for related Application No. PCT/US2007/017301, Apr. 11, 2008.
“Written Opinion” for related Application No. PCT/US2007/017301, Apr. 11, 2008.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200780030039.6, dated Dec. 1, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/834,221, filed Aug. 6, 2007.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2006/006899, filed Feb. 28, 2006.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200680005015.0, dated Aug. 15, 2008.
Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200680005015.0, dated Feb. 9, 2009.
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-519967, dated Feb. 7, 2012.
Canadian Office Action for Canadian App. No. 2,694,936, dated Oct. 16, 2012.
“Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Flow Induced Pipe Vibration in Fully Developed Flow”, by Pittard et al., Jul. 2004, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 75, No. 7, pp. 2393-2401.
“Wireless Sensing of Flow-Induced Vibrations for Pipeline Integrity Monitoring”, by Awawdeh et al., 2006, IEEE, pp. 114-117.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/061170, filed Sep. 23, 2013, 9 pgs.
Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2014 in related application Serial No. 2,694,936, 7 pgs.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/044144, dated Apr. 1, 2014.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, or the Declaration for PCT/US2012/055733, dated Jul. 3, 2013.
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC for European Patent Application No. 12780913.5-1557, dated May 22, 2014, 2 pages.
Official Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201110303797.9, dated Apr. 22, 2014.
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, or the Declaration for PCT/US027409, dated Oct. 17, 2012.
Communication regarding EP Application No. 12713813.9-1802, dated Nov. 8, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090043530 A1 Feb 2009 US