The present invention relates to process variable transmitters. More specifically, the present invention relates to transmitters of the type which are used to control or monitor industrial processes.
Industrial processes are used in industrial manufacturing. There are various types of field devices which are used to monitor the process. For example, process variables such as pressure, flow, temperature and others can be sensed. In addition to using this information for monitoring the process, the process variables can be used to control the process.
Process variables are sensed using field devices known generally as process variable transmitters. In many instances, it is desirable to diagnose operation of the industrial process and identify the condition of the process and associated equipment. For example, diagnostics can be used to identify a failure in the industrial process, for example, so that failed components can be replaced. Other uses of diagnostics include identifying impending failure prior to its occurrence. This allows the component to be replaced or repaired at a desired time without necessarily shutting down the process.
Sensing vibrations is one method used for diagnosing process control devices. For example, a vibration sensor, such as an accelerometer, can be placed directly on a control device and can be used to sense vibration noise signals generated by the device. For example, the noise generated by a pump motor can be monitored. Vibrations are isolated and evaluated by identifying those which exceed an amplitude threshold or which have an abnormal frequency. This can be indicative of an actual or impending failure. Specific examples include sensors placed on a pump or a motor housing, discharge valves, or flanges associated with the control device. Another known diagnostic method is a manual inspection in which an operator listens for an abnormal sound from the control device. There is an ongoing need for improved diagnostic technology in industrial process control or monitoring systems for detecting failed components and components which have degraded or in the process of failing. Various techniques are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,005, filed Jul. 29, 2003 titled “Process Device Diagnostics Using Process Variable Sensor Signal; U.S. Publication No. 2005/0072239, published Apr. 7, 2005, titled “Process Device with Vibration Based Diagnostics” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,010,459, issued Mar. 7, 2006, titled “Process Device Diagnostics Using Process Variable Sensor Signal”.
A process variable transmitter for use in an industrial process control or monitoring system includes a transmitter housing and a process variable sensor having a sensor output related to a process variable. An accelerometer is associated with the transmitter, such as for example, the transmitter housing, process variable sensor, or other component and provides an accelerometer output related to acceleration Diagnostic circuitry provides a diagnostic output as a function of the sensor output and the accelerometer output.
The present invention provides a diagnostic technique for detecting a failure, or predicting an impending failure or reduction in performance of a process device or a process component prior to the occurrence of the failure or reduced performance. With the present invention, vibrations in the process and/or process device are monitored. Vibrations are detected and used to predict a failure, an impending failure, or reduced performance of the process device or process component as a function of the sensed vibration signal and further as a function of a sensed process variable.
Process variables are typically the primary variables which are being controlled in a process. As used herein, process variable means any variable which describes the condition of the process such as, for example, pressure, flow, temperature, product level, pH, turbidity, vibration, position, motor current, any other characteristic of the process, etc. Control signal means any signal (other than a process variable) which is used to control the process. For example, control signal means a desired process variable value (i.e. a setpoint) such as a desired temperature, pressure, flow, product level, pH or turbidity, etch, which is adjusted by a controller or used to control the process. Additionally, a control signal means, calibration values, alarms, alarm conditions, the signal which is provided to a control element such as a valve position signal which is provided to a valve actuator, an energy level which is provided to a heating element, a solenoid on/off signal, etc., or any other signal which relates to control of the process. A diagnostic signal as used herein includes information related to operation of devices and elements in the process control loop, but does not include process variables or control signals. For example, diagnostic signals include valve stem position, applied torque or force, actuator pressure, pressure of a pressurized gas used to actuate a valve, electrical voltage, current, power, resistance, capacitance, inductance, device temperature, stiction, friction, full on and off positions, travel, frequency, amplitude, spectrum and spectral components, stiffness, electric or magnetic field strength, duration, intensity, motion, electric motor back emf, motor current; loop related parameters (such as control loop resistance, voltage, or current), or any other parameter which may be detected or measured in the system. Furthermore, process signal means any signal which is related to the process or element in the process such as, for example, a process variable, a control signal or a diagnostic signal. Process devices include any device which forms part of or couples to a process control loop and is used in the control or monitoring of a process.
It is understood that loop 18 is shown in one configuration and any appropriate process control loop may be used such as a 4-20 mA loop, 2, 3 or 4 wire loop, multi-drop loop and a loop operating in accordance with the HART®, Fieldbus or other digital or analog communication protocol including wireless communication protocols. In operation, transmitter 12 senses a process variable such as flow using sensor 21 and transmits the sensed process variable over loop 18.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a process device, such as transmitter 12 includes a vibration sensor configured to sense vibrations. The vibration sensor can be any type of vibration sensor such as an accelerometer but the invention is not limited to such a sensor. Diagnostic circuitry in transmitter 12, or at a remote location, monitors the sensed vibrations and a sensed process variable and is capable of diagnosing a failure or an impending failure. An output can be provided by transmitter 12, for example to control room 20 or communicator 26 over two-wire process control loop 18, which provides an indication of the failure of impending failure of a process component. Using this information, an operator can repair or replace a failed component, or repair or replace a component prior to its ultimate failure. This allows any maintenance of the process 10 to occur at a scheduled time or as desired. This can be particularly advantageous if the repair or replacement of the component requires the process 10 to be shut down. Further, some components can fail either catastrophically or in a manner which causes other components to be damaged, or cause the release of unsafe product to the environment. By providing an indication that the component may fail in the future, or predicting a time of ultimate failure, the component can be repaired or replaced prior to that ultimate failure.
Transmitter 12 includes a process variable sensor 72. Process variable sensor 72 can be configured to sense any type of process variable such as flow, pressure, temperature, or others. Process variable sensor 72 couples to measurement circuitry 74 which provides a process variable signal to I/O circuitry 76. I/O circuitry 76 is configured to transmit information related to the sensed process variable over two-wire process control loop 18. In some embodiments, I/O circuitry 76 can also receive power through process control loop 18 which is used to completely power the circuitry and components of transmitter 12. Measurement circuitry 74 also couples to diagnostic circuitry 82 and provides a signal related to the sensed process variable to cavity 82.
A vibration sensor 80 in transmitter 12 is configured to sense vibrations 70 and provide a vibration sensor signal to diagnostic circuitry 82. Diagnostic circuitry 82 monitors the vibrations 70 sensed by vibration sensor 80 along with the sensed process variable from sensor 72 provided by measurement circuitry 74 and provides an output via I/O circuitry 76 which provides an indication of a failure or impending failure of a process component. Alternatively, I/O circuitry can provide a status output indicating that the transmitter is working properly.
In some embodiments, the vibration diagnostics of the present invention can be used to avoid or reduce plant downtime by predicting the impending loss of a measurement instrument or of a control instrument while there is still time to replace or repair the device. Vibration information can also be provided to other devices which are in communication with process control loop 18. Data compression algorithms can be used for such transmissions. A diagnostic indication can be provided on two-wire process control loop 18. For example, a HART status, Field Bus data, or other alerts can be transmitted over loop 18. Such an alert can be provided to the control room 20.
The vibration sensor 80 can be any type of vibration sensor. Many vibration sensors operate along a single axis and are capable of only sensing vibrations along that axis. However, in one embodiment additional sensors, or multi-axis sensors, are employed to sense vibrations along more than a single axis, or to profile vibration at various locations in the process device. Additional sensed vibrations can be used by the diagnostic circuitry 82 to provide her diagnostics. Additionally, vibration sensors 80 can be placed in more than one location in the process transmitter 12. These additional sensors can also be used to provide additional vibration based process diagnostics, either along or in combination with a sensed process variable. The scope of the diagnostics can be expanded by comparing or analyzing vibration measurements, either alone or along with a sensed process variable, from more than one process device located in the process system. The additional measurements can be used to provide information related to the overall health of the process or plant. Vibration measurements made near the connection of a process device to the process can be used to detect specific process disruptions such as air hammer from abrupt valve closure, cavitation, aggressive chemical reactions or other process disturbances as well as actual or impending failure of pumps, rotating equipment or similar types of failures.
Although the I/O circuitry 76, measurement circuitry 74 and diagnostic circuitry 82 are shown as separate components in
Process device 240 includes a sensor input channel 254. Sensor input channel 254 includes sensor 21 which senses a process variable and provides a sensor output to amplifier 258 which has an output which is digitized by analog to digital converter 260. Channel 254 is typically used in transmitters such as transmitter 12. Compensation circuitry 262 compensates the digitized signal and provides a digitized process variable signal to microprocessor 246.
In one embodiment, I/O circuitry 242 provides a power output used to completely power some or all of the other circuitry in process device 240 using power received from loop 18. Typically, field devices such as transmitter 12, or controller 22 are powered from loop 18 while communicator 26 or control room 20 has a separate power source. As described above, process signal input 252 provides a process signal to microprocessor 246. The process signal may be a process variable from sensor 21, the control output provided to a control element, a diagnostic signal sensed by sensor 80, or a control signal, process variable or diagnostic signal received over loop 18, or a process signal received or generated by some other means, such as another I/O channel.
A user I/O circuit 276 is also connected to microprocessor 246 and provides communication between device 240 and a user. Typically, user I/O circuit 276 includes a display and/or audio for output, and a keypad or other interface for input. I/O circuit 276 can be used to allow a user to monitor or input process signals, such as process variables, control signals (setpoints, calibration values, alarms, alarm conditions, etc.).
The diagnostic output of the present invention can be used to provide an output signal, provide a local indication to an operator, or provide a communication signal for transmission to a control room or other diagnostic annunciation.
As discussed above, the diagnostics are a function of techniques which employ a sensed vibration and a sensed process variable. For example, the diagnostics can utilize trends in the relations between the signals over a period of time. This information can be correlated, with respect to the process variable signal, with wear of bearings or pump components. Additionally, the diagnostics circuitry can be used to correlate vibration signals and sensed process variable with various procedures or occurrences which occur during operation of the industrial process. For example, an aggressive chemical reaction may have a particular vibration signature and a related change in the process variable. In some embodiments, the relationship between the sensed process variable and vibrations, for example a changing relationship between the two, can provide an indication of a diagnostic condition such as a component which is failing or otherwise changing in some manner.
In one aspect, the output from the vibration sensor is used to validate operation of the process variable sensor. For example, a vibration experienced by the pressure transmitter may be correlated to a change in the measured process variable. This relationship can be monitored over time and used to validate proper operation of the process variable sensor.
The vibration sensor 80 can be any appropriate vibration sensor. One known vibration detection and measurement sensor is an accelerometer. There are a number of different accelerometer technologies which are currently employed including capacitive, electrodynamic, piezoelectric, and others. The accelerometer produces an output signal that is related to the sensed vibration. The output signal can have a linear or other relationship to the strength of the vibration or the frequency of the vibration. Another example diagnostics sensor can be embodied in a MEMS configuration in which a cantilever is utilized to sense vibrations.
Piezoelectric accelerometers are relatively rugged and have a wide signal bandwidth, in the order of tens of kilohertz, covering much of the audio range. One example sensor is available from PCB Piezoelectronics and identified as the IMI Sensor Series 660, which is a family of low cost embeddable accelerometers. Various configurations are available including two wire with and without signal processing and three wire low power. For example, the low power configuration operates over an extended temperature range and can be mounted directly to processes which undergo a wide temperature variation. An excitation voltage is applied, for example between 3 and 5 volts DC and the current throughout the sensor is on the order of 750 microamperes.
Another example accelerometer is the MMA series available from Motorola. These accelerometers include various configurations such as surface mount integrated circuit packages, temperature compensation, integral signal conditioning and filtering, self testing and fault latch capabilities. These accelerometers use a capacitive sensing technique that can be modeled as two stationary plates with a movable plate placed therebetween. The center plate is deflected from its rest position when the system is subject to acceleration.
Any of appropriate type of accelerometer may be used with the present invention. For example, a capacitive accelerometer uses a metal beam or micromachine feature which produces a variable capacitance which changes in response to acceleration. A piezoelectric electric sensor uses a piezoelectric monitor mounted to the device. Acceleration is related to a voltage output from the piezoelectric crystal. A piezo resistant sensor can, for example, use a beam or micromachine feature having a resistance which changes in response to acceleration. A hall defect sensor uses a configuration in which motion is converted to an electrical signal by sensing a change in magnetic fields. Various types of tri-access accelerometers can be used. For example, one such accelerometer is the Okidata ML8950. Another example device is available from analog devices as the AVXL330.
Using a tri-access accelerometer, a transmitter in accordance with the present invention can be configured to utilize two separate measurements for diagnostics. The transmitter can utilize the output from the accelerometer as well as the output from the process variable sensor, such as a pressure sensor. The signals from these two devices can be compared to generate unique system diagnostics. For example, in a pressure transmitter, an accelerometer can be incorporated. The accelerometer can be activated using a manual input, such as being struck with a hammer or other heavy object by an operator. The impact can be directed along an axis of a sensored diaphragm of a pressure sensor. This uncalibrated impact will cause both the accelerometer to measure acceleration and the pressure sensor to measure a pressure pulse. If both outputs are detected, diagnostics can confirm proper operation of the device.
As a further embodiment of the configurations described above, the waveforms or other aspects of the output of the process variable sensor and the accelerometer can be compared. For example, in some configurations, a linear relationship can be observed between the output from the pressure sensor and the output from the accelerometer in response to a strike or other impact on the transmitter. A variation of these responses can provide an indication of a failure, for example, a loss of oil fill fluid.
In one example, a spring-loaded punch is used to provide a calibrated strike to the device. However, any desired type of calibrated strike can be used. In such a configuration, the magnitude of the strike can be used in a diagnostic algorithm along with the outputs from the process variable sensor and the accelerometer. In a further configuration, multiple calibrated strikes are applied for use in the diagnostics. For example, strikes of differing magnitudes can be used and the resultant changes in the process variable and the output from the accelerometer can be compared.
In another example configuration, ambient energy is used as the source of the “strike”. For example, a water hammer effect, pump pulsation or machinery vibrations can be used. For example, two different water hammers can result in two different comparisons that can used as a calibration check. It can also provide an indication that the transmitters are functioning in accordance with performance specifications.
In another example, a constant vibration causes an offset in the sensor process variable such as an offset in a sensed pressure. For example, a vibration in a wet leg which couples a pressure sensor to a process causes the pressure sensor to indicate an increased pressure. In some configurations, the pressure sensor acts as a low pass filter and rectifier such that the pulsation appears as a pressure offset. The process variable, along with the monitored acceleration, can be used to perform diagnostics. Further, the monitored acceleration can also be used to compensate the process variable such that the offset caused by the vibrations are removed from the process variable measurements using, for example, microprocessor 246 shown in
The accelerometer 80 can be mounted in any appropriate location. The accelerometer can be mounted to the housing of the transmitter, or, for example, directly to the process variable sensor such as directly to a pressure sensor. However, the pressure sensor is typically isolated in a pressure module and, in some configurations, may be isolated from vibrations such as strikes applied to the transmitter. The housing and placement of the accelerometer can be designed to enhance the susceptibility to particular types of vibrations, or other considerations. High speed data capturing techniques can be utilized in order to obtain a detailed profile of acceleration sensed by the acceleration sensor.
In one configuration, the steps illustrated in
The present invention provides a number of techniques for performing diagnostics or compensation in a process device of a process control monitoring system. For example, external influences, either artificial, such as a hammer strike, or ambient, such as a water hammer or machinery vibration, which causes acceleration of the device, can be measured using an accelerometer. The effect of this acceleration is measured using an accelerometer, for example, a single axis, a dual axis, or a tri-axis accelerometer and a process variable sensor such as a pressure sensor. These two measurements can be used to diagnose operation, for example, to verify proper operation of the transmitter. In other configurations, the two measured signals are manipulated, for example, the ratios of the two signals can be observed and compared with the magnitude of calibrated external influence in order to verify transmitter operation. Using a ratio of the two signals along with the magnitude of the two signals, and the magnitude of an external influence along with ratios of the magnitude of the external influence, further techniques can be used to verify operation of the transmitter. In addition to verification of operation, calibration and compensation can be performed in a real time using the acceleration signal. By monitoring and analyzing signals, the transmitter can provide a notification or alert regarding status. The accelerometer can be positioned as desired, for example, fabricated adjacent the process variable sensor such as pressure sensor, or electronics associated with the sensor. For example, a capacitance based accelerometer can be integrated in an existing or modified analog to digital converter such as a capacitance to digital integrated circuit. The tri-axis accelerometer can be used to perform multiple functions including measurement of vibration as a diagnostic tool, measurement of inclination of the device as a means for automatically compensate head effects in pressure measurements, measurement of an influence on the device compared to its influence on the process variable sensor for use in transmitted verification, and/or measurement of acceleration to compensate for acceleration pressure offsets. A source of acceleration can be integrated into the device such as a spring-loaded punch mechanism or the like. The mechanism can be actuated by an operator, or it can be automatically actuated by electrical circuitry in the transmitter. In another configuration, a mechanical or pressure external influence integrated into the process connection which couples the transmitter to the industrial process. The accelerometer can be attached directly to the process variable sensor to create a more predictable relationship between the two signals.
In one configuration, the accelerometer can be configured to measure a time based periodicity of the acceleration input. If the acceleration affects process variable measurement, such as pressure measurement, accuracy, then measurements which are taken during “quiet” intervals can be considered as providing higher accuracy. Such a system could, for example, hold the most recent “good” value when the accelerometer measures a large acceleration input which may cause an error in the measurement. In another example, in some configurations, an increase in the measured process variable, for example, an increase in a flow rate, also corresponds to an increase in vibrations, for example, increased pump pulsations or higher magnitude pipe vibrations. The signals from the process variable “pressure” sensor in the accelerometer can be compared as an additional diagnostic to provide more confidence in the measured process variable.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In some embodiments, the invention can be embodied in any type of process device. Any type of processor can be used including capacitive based accelerometer using a metal beam or micro machine feature which produces a changed capacitance related to acceleration, piezoelectric sensors using a crystal mounted to a mass, piezoelectric sensors, for example, in which a beam has a resistance which changes based upon acceleration, Hall effect based sensors which are based upon changing magnetic fields, etc. The diagnostic circuitry of the present invention can be embodied in any appropriate component. For example, the circuitry can be embodied in a microprocessor and associated components along with programming instructions or can comprise other components or embodiments. Example acceleration sensors include capacitive, electrodynamic, piezoelectric and Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS).
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2533339 | Willenborg | Dec 1950 | A |
| 3012432 | Moore et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
| 3096434 | King | Jul 1963 | A |
| 3218863 | Calvert | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3232712 | Stearns | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3249833 | Vosteen | May 1966 | A |
| 3374112 | Danon | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3404264 | Kugler | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3410779 | Whitehead et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3468164 | Sutherland | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3557621 | Ferran | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3590370 | Fleischer | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3618592 | Stewart | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3633053 | Peters | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3688190 | Blum | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3691842 | Akeley | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3697835 | Satori | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3701280 | Stroman | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3808480 | Johnston | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3849637 | Caruso et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3855858 | Cushing | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3924069 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3924219 | Braun | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3948098 | Richardson et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3952759 | Ottenstein | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3964296 | Matzuk | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3973184 | Raber | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4008619 | Alcaide et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4043008 | Weiss et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| RE29383 | Gallatin et al. | Sep 1977 | E |
| 4058975 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4083031 | Pharo, Jr. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4099413 | Ohte et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4102199 | Talpouras | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4122719 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4158217 | Bell | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4168518 | Lee | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4177496 | Bell et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4227419 | Park | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4237454 | Meyer | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4249164 | Tivy | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4250490 | Dahlke | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4255964 | Morison | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4279013 | Dahlke | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4287553 | Braunlich | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4292769 | Maag et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4322775 | Delatorre | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4336567 | Anastasia | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4337516 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4355536 | McShane et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4358814 | Lee et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4370890 | Frick | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4383443 | Langdon | May 1983 | A |
| 4389895 | Rud, Jr. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4390321 | Langlois et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4393711 | Lapides | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4399824 | Davidson | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4417312 | Cronin et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4422125 | Antonazzi et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4422335 | Ohnesorge et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4423634 | Audenard et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4434451 | Delatorre | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4446741 | Sirokorad et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4448062 | Peterson et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4455874 | Paros | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4458537 | Bell et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4459858 | Marsh | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4463612 | Thompson | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4490773 | Moffatt | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4517468 | Kemper et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4528869 | Kubo et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4530234 | Cullick et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4536753 | Parker | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4540468 | Genco et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4542436 | Carusillo | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4562742 | Bell | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4571689 | Hildebrand et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4630265 | Sexton | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4635214 | Kasai et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4641529 | Lorenzi et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4642782 | Kemper et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4644479 | Kemper et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4649515 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4668473 | Agarwal | May 1987 | A |
| 4670733 | Bell | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4686638 | Furuse | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4696191 | Claytor et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4705212 | Miller et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4707796 | Calabro et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4720806 | Schippers et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4736367 | Wroblewski et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4736763 | Britton et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4758308 | Carr | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4777585 | Kokawa et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4785669 | Benson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4807151 | Citron | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4818994 | Orth et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4831564 | Suga | May 1989 | A |
| 4833922 | Frick et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4841286 | Kummer | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4853693 | Eaton-Williams | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860232 | Lee et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4866628 | Natarajan | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4873655 | Kondraske | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4875369 | Delatorre | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4878012 | Schulte et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4895031 | Cage | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4907167 | Skeirik | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4924418 | Bachman et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4926364 | Brotherton | May 1990 | A |
| 4926674 | Fossum et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4934196 | Romano | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4939753 | Olson | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4951174 | Grantham et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4964125 | Kim | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4977480 | Nishihara | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4979125 | Kwun et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4988990 | Warrior | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4992965 | Holter et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5005142 | Lipchak et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5014543 | Franklin et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5015949 | Koch et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5019760 | Chu et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5025344 | Maly et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5043862 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047990 | Gafos et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5051743 | Orszulak | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5053815 | Wendell | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5057774 | Verhelst et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5067099 | McCown et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5081598 | Bellows et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5089979 | McEachern et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5089984 | Struger et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5094109 | Dean et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5098197 | Shepard et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5099436 | McCown et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5103409 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5111531 | Grayson et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5121467 | Skeirik | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122794 | Warrior | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122976 | Bellows et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5130936 | Sheppard et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134574 | Beaverstock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5137370 | McCullock et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5142612 | Skeirik | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143452 | Maxedon et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5148378 | Shibayama et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5150289 | Badavas | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5167009 | Skeirik | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5168419 | Delatorre | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5175678 | Frerichs et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5189624 | Barlow et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5193143 | Kaemmerer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5194819 | Briefer | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195098 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197114 | Skeirik | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197328 | Fitzgerald | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5212765 | Skeirik | May 1993 | A |
| 5214582 | Gray | May 1993 | A |
| 5216226 | Miyoshi | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5216612 | Cornett et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224203 | Skeirik | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5228780 | Shepard et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5230250 | Delatorre | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5233875 | Obermeier et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5235527 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5265031 | Malczewski | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265222 | Nishiya et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5267241 | Kowal | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5269311 | Kirchner et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5274572 | O'Neill et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5282131 | Rudd et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282261 | Skeirik | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5293585 | Morita | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5303181 | Stockton | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5305230 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5311421 | Nomura et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5317520 | Castle | May 1994 | A |
| 5327357 | Feinstein et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5329818 | Frick et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5333240 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5340271 | Freeman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5347843 | Orr et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5349541 | Alexandro, Jr. et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5351199 | Ticcioni et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5357449 | Oh | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5361628 | Marko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5365423 | Chand | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5365787 | Hernandez et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367612 | Bozich et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5369674 | Yokose et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372041 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5384699 | Levy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5386373 | Keeler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5388465 | Okaniwa et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392293 | Hsue | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5394341 | Kepner | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5394543 | Hill et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5404064 | Mermelstein et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5408406 | Mathur et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5408586 | Skeirik | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410495 | Ramamurthi | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5414645 | Hirano | May 1995 | A |
| 5419197 | Ogi et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5430642 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434774 | Seberger | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5436705 | Raj | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5440478 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5442639 | Crowder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444820 | Tzes et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5467355 | Umeda et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469070 | Koluvek | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469156 | Kogura | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469735 | Watanabe | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469749 | Shimada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5471884 | Czarnocki et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481199 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5481200 | Voegele et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5483387 | Bauhahn et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485753 | Burns et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486996 | Samad et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5488697 | Kaemmerer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489831 | Harris | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5492016 | Pinto et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5495769 | Broden et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5497661 | Stripf et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5510799 | Maltby et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511004 | Dubost et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| RE35269 | Comerford | Jun 1996 | E |
| 5526293 | Mozumder et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5537335 | Antaki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539638 | Keeler et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5542300 | Lee | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548528 | Keeler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549137 | Lenz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5551306 | Scarpa | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5555190 | Derby et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5560246 | Bottinger et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5561599 | Lu | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570034 | Needham et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570300 | Henry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5572420 | Lu | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5572438 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5573032 | Lenz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578763 | Spencer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5591922 | Segeral et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598521 | Kilgore et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600148 | Cole et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5600791 | Carlson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608650 | McClendon et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5623605 | Keshav et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629870 | Farag et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633809 | Wissenbach et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5637802 | Frick et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5640491 | Bhat et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5642301 | Warrior et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5644240 | Brugger | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5650943 | Powell et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5654869 | Ohi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661668 | Yemini et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5665899 | Willcox | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5668322 | Broden | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5669713 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671335 | Davis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672247 | Pangalos et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5675504 | Serodes et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5675724 | Beal et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5680109 | Lowe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682317 | Keeler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682476 | Tapperson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5700090 | Eryurek | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5703575 | Kirkpatrick | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704011 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5705754 | Keita et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5705978 | Frick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5708211 | Jepson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5708585 | Kushion | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710370 | Shanahan et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710708 | Wiegland | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713668 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719378 | Jackson, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5731522 | Sittler | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734975 | Zele et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5736649 | Kawasaki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741074 | Wang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742845 | Wagner | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746511 | Eryurek et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5747701 | Marsh et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5748883 | Carlson et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5752008 | Bowling | May 1998 | A |
| 5754451 | Williams | May 1998 | A |
| 5756898 | Diatschenko et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757608 | Bernot et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5764539 | Rani | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5764891 | Warrior | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5781024 | Blomberg et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781878 | Mizoguchi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790413 | Bartusiak et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796006 | Bellet et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5801689 | Huntsman | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805442 | Crater et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817950 | Wiklund et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825664 | Warrior et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828567 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5829876 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5848383 | Yuuns | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854993 | Crichnik | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854994 | Canada et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859964 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5869772 | Storer | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874676 | Maki, Jr. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876122 | Eryurek | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880376 | Sai et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5887978 | Lunghofer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5900801 | Heagle et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5908990 | Cummings | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5911162 | Denner | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912499 | Diem et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920016 | Broden | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923557 | Eidson | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5924086 | Mathur et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926778 | Pöppel | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5934371 | Bussear et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5936514 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940013 | Vladimir et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940290 | Dixon | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5956663 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965819 | Piety et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970430 | Burns et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5992240 | Tsuruoka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995910 | Discenzo | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002952 | Diab et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006338 | Longsdorf et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014612 | Larson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014902 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016523 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016706 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017143 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6023399 | Kogure | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026352 | Burns et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6038579 | Sekine | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6041287 | Dister et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045260 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6046642 | Brayton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6047220 | Eryurek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6047222 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6052655 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059254 | Sundet et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6061603 | Papadopoulos et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069560 | Larsson | May 2000 | A |
| 6072150 | Sheffer | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6094600 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6104875 | Gallagher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112131 | Ghorashi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6119047 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119529 | Di Marco et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6139180 | Usher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151560 | Jones | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6179964 | Begemann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182501 | Furuse et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192281 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195591 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6199018 | Quist et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209048 | Wolff | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6236096 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236948 | Eck et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6237424 | Salmasi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6260004 | Hays et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263487 | Stripf et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272438 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6289735 | Dister et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295875 | Frick et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298377 | Hartikainen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298454 | Schleiss et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304828 | Swanick et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6307483 | Westfield et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6311136 | Henry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6317701 | Pyostsia et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327914 | Dutton | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330005 | Tonelli et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330525 | Hays et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6347252 | Behr et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6356191 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6360277 | Ruckley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6367328 | Gorman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370448 | Eryurek et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370879 | Stalder et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377859 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378364 | Pelletier et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6396426 | Balard et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397114 | Eryurek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405099 | Nagai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6425038 | Sprecher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434504 | Eryurek et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6447459 | Larom | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6449574 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6473656 | Langels et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473710 | Eryurek | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6480793 | Martin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6492921 | Kunitani et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6493689 | Kotoulas et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6496814 | Busche | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6497222 | Bolz et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6505517 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6519546 | Eryurek et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6530259 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6532392 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6539267 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6546814 | Choe et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556145 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6561038 | Gravel et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6564268 | Davis et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567006 | Lander et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6584847 | Hirose | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6594603 | Eryurek et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597997 | Tingley | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6601005 | Eryurek et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6611775 | Coursolle et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6615149 | Wehrs | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6633782 | Schleiss et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6637267 | Fiebelkorn et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6654697 | Eryurek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6662120 | Drahm et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6701274 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6722185 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6727812 | Sauler et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6735549 | Ridolfo | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6738388 | Stevenson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6751560 | Tingley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6754601 | Eryurek et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6758168 | Koskinen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6785592 | Smith et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6854028 | Smith | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6859755 | Eryurek et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6880403 | Shimada et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6892317 | Sampath et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6904476 | Hedtke | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6907383 | Eryurek et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6915364 | Christensen et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6920789 | Sakai | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6951133 | Passarelli | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6970003 | Rome et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6976503 | Ens et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6993445 | Clarke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7010459 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7013185 | Simon | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018800 | Huisenga et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7023205 | Krupp | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7035773 | Keyes et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7036381 | Broden et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7040179 | Drahm et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058542 | Hauhia et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7085610 | Eryurek et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099852 | Unsworth et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7109883 | Trimble et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7114516 | Ito | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7137307 | Huybrechts et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143007 | Long et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7171281 | Weber et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7206646 | Nixon et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7254518 | Eryurek et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7258021 | Broden | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7258024 | Dimarco et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7262693 | Karschnia et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7290450 | Brown et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7321846 | Huiseng et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7406387 | Hashizume et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7435581 | West | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7502744 | Garrow et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7523667 | Brown et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7528737 | Hedtke et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7577543 | Brahmajosyula et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7627441 | Longsdorf et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7680549 | Kavaklioglu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7702478 | Hedtke et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7821437 | Rud et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7827988 | Matthews et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7913566 | Hedtke | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7940189 | Brown | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8311778 | Bronczyk et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 20020013629 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029808 | Friend et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032544 | Reid et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055790 | Havekost | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077711 | Nixon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077782 | Fruehling et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078752 | Braunling et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020121910 | Rome et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020130846 | Nixon et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145515 | Snowbarger et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145568 | Winter | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020148644 | Schultz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163427 | Eryurek et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194547 | Christenson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030014536 | Christensen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033040 | Billings | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030045962 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083953 | Starkey | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158803 | Darken et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040024568 | Eryurek et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025593 | Hashimoto et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064203 | Bornside et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093174 | Lander | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128034 | Lenker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167750 | Pagnano et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186927 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199361 | Lu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249583 | Eryurek et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050011278 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055137 | Andren et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050072239 | Longsdorf et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132808 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149570 | Sasaki et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050168343 | Longsdorf et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050284237 | Henry et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060075009 | Lenz et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060087402 | Manning et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060127183 | Bishop | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212139 | Hedtke et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229931 | Fligler et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277000 | Wehrs | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070010967 | Scherr | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070010968 | Longsdorf et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168057 | Blevins et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266020 | Case et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080033693 | Andenna et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082294 | Pihlaja et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103629 | Milanovic et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110459 | Farbarik | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208538 | Visser et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090121790 | Brown et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309574 | Goupil | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100011869 | Klosinski | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138066 | Kong | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211443 | Carrel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20120041704 | Rovner et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120051399 | Rud et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 999950 | Nov 1976 | CA |
| 1185841 | Jun 1998 | CN |
| 1 257 179 | Jun 2000 | CN |
| 1346435 | Apr 2002 | CN |
| 32 13 866 | Oct 1983 | DE |
| 3340834 | May 1985 | DE |
| 35 03 597 | Jul 1986 | DE |
| 35 03 597 | Jul 1986 | DE |
| 35 40 204 | Sep 1986 | DE |
| 40 08 560 | Sep 1990 | DE |
| 43 43 747 | Jun 1994 | DE |
| 44 33 593 | Jun 1995 | DE |
| 195 02 499 | Aug 1996 | DE |
| 296 00 609 | Mar 1997 | DE |
| 197 04 694 | Aug 1997 | DE |
| 19930660 | Jul 1999 | DE |
| 199 05 071 | Aug 2000 | DE |
| 19905071 | Aug 2000 | DE |
| 299 17 651 | Dec 2000 | DE |
| 199 47 129 | Apr 2001 | DE |
| 100 36 971 | Feb 2002 | DE |
| 102 23 725 | Apr 2003 | DE |
| 0 122 622 | Oct 1984 | EP |
| 0 413 814 | Feb 1991 | EP |
| 0 511 553 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0 487 419 | May 1992 | EP |
| 0 512 794 | Nov 1992 | EP |
| 0 524 550 | Jan 1993 | EP |
| 0 594 227 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 0 624 847 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0 644 470 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 0 697 586 | Feb 1996 | EP |
| 0 697 586 | Feb 1996 | EP |
| 0 749 057 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 0 825 506 | Jul 1997 | EP |
| 0 827 096 | Sep 1997 | EP |
| 0 838 768 | Sep 1997 | EP |
| 1 022 626 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 0 807 804 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 0 827 096 | Mar 1998 | EP |
| 1 058 093 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0 335 957 | Nov 1999 | EP |
| 0 965 897 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 1 022 626 | Jul 2000 | EP |
| 2 302 514 | Sep 1976 | FR |
| 2 334 827 | Jul 1977 | FR |
| 928704 | Jun 1963 | GB |
| 1 534 280 | Nov 1978 | GB |
| 1 534 288 | Nov 1978 | GB |
| 2 310 346 | Aug 1997 | GB |
| 2 317 969 | Apr 1998 | GB |
| 2 342 453 | Apr 2000 | GB |
| 2 347 232 | Aug 2000 | GB |
| 56-031573 | Mar 1981 | JP |
| 57196619 | Feb 1982 | JP |
| 58-129316 | Aug 1983 | JP |
| 59-116811 | Jul 1984 | JP |
| 59-163520 | Sep 1984 | JP |
| 59-176643 | Oct 1984 | JP |
| 59-211196 | Nov 1984 | JP |
| 59-211896 | Nov 1984 | JP |
| 60-000507 | Jan 1985 | JP |
| 60-76619 | May 1985 | JP |
| 60-131495 | Jul 1985 | JP |
| 60-174915 | Sep 1985 | JP |
| 62-30915 | Feb 1987 | JP |
| 62-080535 | Apr 1987 | JP |
| 62-50901 | Sep 1987 | JP |
| 63-169532 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| 64-01914 | Jan 1989 | JP |
| 64-72699 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 11-87430 | Jul 1989 | JP |
| 2-05105 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| 3-118424 | May 1991 | JP |
| 3-229124 | Oct 1991 | JP |
| 4-70906 | Mar 1992 | JP |
| 05-60596 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5-122768 | May 1993 | JP |
| 5-164781 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| 6-95882 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| 06242192 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 06-248224 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| 7-063586 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 07234988 | Sep 1995 | JP |
| 8-054923 | Feb 1996 | JP |
| 8-102241 | Apr 1996 | JP |
| 08-114638 | May 1996 | JP |
| 8-136386 | May 1996 | JP |
| 8-166309 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 8-247076 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| 8-313466 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 9054611 | Feb 1997 | JP |
| 2712625 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 2712701 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 2753592 | Mar 1998 | JP |
| 07225530 | May 1998 | JP |
| 10-232170 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 11-083575 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 11-505922 | May 1999 | JP |
| 3139597 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2002-538420 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2003-503784 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2004021712 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004034112 | Feb 2004 | JP |
| 2004-186445 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2005-048638 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| 09-005092 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007-040763 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007-507712 | Mar 2007 | JP |
| 2008-513879 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2080647 | May 1997 | RU |
| 2121105 | Oct 1998 | RU |
| 2190267 | Sep 2002 | RU |
| 901676 | Jan 1982 | SU |
| WO 9425933 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO 9523361 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9611389 | Apr 1996 | WO |
| WO 9612993 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO 9639617 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO 9721157 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| WO 9725603 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 9806024 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO 9813677 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9814855 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9820469 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9839718 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 9919782 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 9953286 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 0041050 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO 0050851 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0055700 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO 0070531 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0101213 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 0119440 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0177766 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 0190704 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0227418 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 03081002 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004044666 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004048898 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2005010522 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| 2005033639 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2007100280 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008039993 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Awawdeh et al., Wireless Sensing of Flow-Induced Vibrations for Pipeline Integrity Monitoring, 2006 IEEE, pp. 114-117. |
| Pittard et al., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Flow Induced Pipe Vibration in Fully Developed Flow, Jul. 2004, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 75, No. 7, pp. 2393-2401. |
| Damiano et al., Current Applications of Vibration Monitoring and Neutron Noise Analysis, Feb. 1990, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 39 pp. |
| Reimche et al., Basics of Vibration Monitoring for Fault Detection and Process Control, Jun. 2-6, 2003, PANNDT 2003, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 10 pp. |
| Hodkiewicz et al., The Effect of Change in Flow Rate on the Vibration of Double-Suction Centrifugal Pumps, 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, vol. 216, Part E, pp. 47-58. |
| “A TCP\IP Tutorial” by, Socolofsky et al., Spider Systems Limited, Jan. 1991 pp. 1-23. |
| “Approval Standards for Explosionproof Electrical Equipment General Requirements”, Factory Mutual Research, Cl. No. 3615, Mar. 1989, pp. 1-34. |
| “Approval Standard Intrinsically Safe Apparatus and Associated Apparatus for Use in Class I, II, and III, Division 1 Hazardous (Classified) Locations”, Factory Mutual Research, Cl. No. 3610, Oct. 1988, pp. 1-70. |
| “Automation On-line” by, Phillips et al., Plant Services, Jul. 1997, pp. 41-45. |
| “Climb to New Heights by Controlling your PLCs Over the Internet” by, Phillips et al., Intech, Aug. 1998, pp. 50-51. |
| “Ethernet emerges as viable, inexpensive fieldbus”, Paul G. Schreier, Personal Engineering, Dec. 1997, p. 23-29. |
| “Ethernet Rules Closed-loop System” by, Eidson et al., Intech, Jun. 1998, pp. 39-42. |
| “Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 2: Physical Layer Specification and Service Definition”, ISA-S50.02-1992, pp. 1-93. |
| “Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 3: Data Link Service Definition”, ISA-S50.02-1997, Part 3, Aug. 1997, pp. 1-159. |
| Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 4: Data Link Protocol Specification, ISA-S50.02-1997, Part 4, Aug. 1997, pp. 1-148. |
| “Fieldbus Support for Process Analysis” by, Blevins et al., Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., 1995, pp. 121-128. |
| “Fieldbus Technical Overview Understanding FOUNDATION™ fieldbus technology”, Fisher-Rosemount, 1998, pp. 1-23. |
| “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—Http/1.0” by, Berners-Lee et al., MIT/LCS, May 1996, pp. 1-54. |
| “Infranets, Intranets, and the Internet” by, Pradip Madan, Echelon Corp, Sensors, Mar. 1997, pp. 46-50. |
| “Internet Protocol Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification” by, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, RFC 791, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-43. |
| “Introduction to Emit”, emWare, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-22. |
| “Introduction to the Internet Protocols” by, Charles L. Hedrick, Computer Science Facilities Group, Rutgers University, Oct. 3, 1988, pp. 1-97. |
| “Is There a Future for Ethernet in Industrial Control?”, Miclot et al., Plant Engineering, Oct. 1988, pp. 44-46, 48, 50. |
| LFM/SIMA Internet Remote Diagnostics Research Project Summary Report, Stanford University, Jan. 23, 1997, pp. 1-6. |
| “Managing Devices with the Web” by, Howard et al., Byte, Sep. 1997, pp. 45-64. |
| “PC Software Gets Its Edge From Windows, Components, and the Internet”, Wayne Labs, I&Cs, Mar. 1997, pp. 23-32. |
| Proceedings Sensor Expo, Aneheim, California, Produced by Expocon Managemnet Associates, Inc., Apr. 1996, pp. 9-21. |
| Proceedings Sensor Expo, Boston, Massachuttes, Produced by Expocon Management Associates, Inc., May 1997, pp. 1-416. |
| “Smart Sensor Network of the Future” by, Jay Warrior, Sensors, Mar. 1997, pp. 40-45. |
| “The Embedded Web Site” by, John R. Hines, IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 1996, p. 23. |
| “Transmission Control Protocol: Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification” Information Sciences Institute, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-69. |
| “On-Line Statistical Process Control for a Glass Tank Ingredient Scale,” by R.A. Weisman, IFAC real Time Programming, 1985, pp. 29-38. |
| “The Performance of Control Charts for Monitoring Process Variation,” by C. Lowry et al., Commun. Statis.-Simula., 1995, pp. 409-437. |
| “A Knowledge-Based Approach for Detection and Diagnosis of Out-of-Control Events in Manufacturing Processes,” by P. Love et al., IEEE, 1989, pp. 736-741. |
| “Advanced Engine Diagnostics Using Universal Process Modeling”, by P. O'Sullivan, Presented at the 1996 SAE Conference on Future Transportation Technology, pp. 1-9. |
| “Programmable Hardware Architectures for Sensor Validation”, by M.P. Henry et al., Control Eng. Practice, vol. 4, No. 10., pp. 1339-1354, (1996). |
| “Sensor Validation for Power Plants Using Adaptive Backpropagation Neural Network,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 37, No. 2, by E. Eryurek et al. Apr. 1990, pp. 1040-1047. |
| “Smart Temperature Measurement in the '90s”, by T. Kerlin et al., C& I, (1990). |
| “Software-Based Fault-Tolerant Control Design for Improved Power Plant Operation,” IEEE/IFAC Joint Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design, Mar. 7-9, 1994, pp. 585-590. |
| A Standard Interface for Self-Validating Sensors, by M.P. Henry et al., Report No. QUEL 1884/91, (1991). |
| “Taking Full Advantage of Smart Transmitter Technology Now,” by G. Orrison, Control Engineering, vol. 42, No. 1, Jan. 1995. |
| “Application of Neural Networks for Sensor Validationand Plant Monitoring,” by B. Upadhyaya et al., Nuclear Engineering, vol. 97, No. 2, Feb. 1992 pp. 170-176. |
| “Automated Generation of Nonlinear System Characterization for Sensor Failure Detection,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., ISA, 1989 pp. 269-274. |
| “In Situ Calibration of Nuclear Plant Platinum Resistance Thermometers Using Johnson Noise Methods,” EPRI, Jun. 1983. |
| “Johnson Noise Thermometer for High Radiation and High-Temperature Environments,” by L. Oakes et al., Fifth Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1988, pp. 2-23. |
| “Development of a Resistance Thermometer For Use Up to 1600° C.”, by M.J. de Groot et al., CAL LAB, Jul./Aug. 1996, pp. 38-41. |
| “Survey, Applications, and Prospects of Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by T. Blalock et al., Electrical Engineering Department, 1981 pp. 2-11. |
| “Noise Thermometry for Industrial and Metrological Applications at KFA Julich,” by H. Brixy et al., 7th International Symposium on Temperature, 1992. |
| “Johnson Noise Power Thermometer and its Application in Process Temperature Measurement,” by T.V. Blalock et al., American Institute of Physics 1982, pp. 1249-1259. |
| “Field-based Architecture is Based on Open Systems, Improves Plant Performance”, by P. Cleaveland, I&CS, Aug. 1996, pp. 73-74. |
| “Tuned-Circuit Dual-Mode Johnson Noise Thermometers,” by R.L. Shepard et al., Apr. 1992. |
| “Tuned-Circuit Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by Michael Roberts et al., 7th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1990. |
| “Smart Field Devices Provide New Process Data, Increase System Flexibility,” by Mark Boland, I&CS, Nov. 1994, pp. 45-51. |
| “Wavelet Analysis of Vibration, Part I: Theory,” by D.E. Newland, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 116, Oct. 1994, pp. 409-416. |
| “Wavelet Analysis of Vibration, Part 2: Wavelet Maps,” by D.E. Newland, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 116, Oct. 1994, pp. 417-425. |
| “Development of a Long-Life, High-Reliability Remotely Operated Johnson Noise Thermometer,” by R.L. Shepard et al., ISA, 1991, pp. 77-84. |
| “Application of Johnson Noise Thermometry to Space Nuclear Reactors,” by M.J. Roberts et al., Presented at the 6th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 9-12, 1989. |
| “A Decade of Progress in High Temperature Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by T.V. Blalock et al., American Institute of Physics, 1982 pp. 1219-1223. |
| “Sensor and Device Diagnostics for Predictive and Proactive Maintenance”, by B. Boynton, A Paper Presented at the Electric Power Research Institute—Fossil Plant Maintenance Conference in Baltimore, Maryland, Jul. 29-Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 50-1-50-6. |
| “Detection of Hot Spots in Thin Metal Films Using an Ultra Sensitive Dual Channel Noise Measurement System,” by G.H. Massiha et al., Energy and Information Technologies in the Southeast, vol. 3 of 3, Apr. 1989, pp. 1310-1314. |
| “Detecting Blockage in Process Connections of Differential Pressure Transmitters”, by E. Taya et al., SICE, 1995, pp. 1605-1608. |
| “Development and Application of Neural Network Algorithms for Process Diagnostics,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Decision and Control, 1990, pp. 3277-3282. |
| “A Fault-Tolerant Interface for Self-Validating Sensors”, by M.P. Henry, Colloquium, pp. 3/1-3/2 (Nov. 1990). |
| “Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network Applications to Fault Diagnosis”, by P. Frank et al., International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, (1997), pp. 68-88. |
| “Keynote Paper: Hardware Compilation—A New Technique for Rapid Prototyping of Digital Systems—Applied to Sensor Validation”, by M.P. Henry, Control Eng. Practice, vol. 3, No. 7., pp. 907-924, (1995). |
| “The Implications of Digital Communications on Sensor Validation”, by M. Henry et al., Report No. QUEL 1912/92, (1992). |
| “In-Situ Response Time Testing of Thermocouples”, ISA, by H.M. Hashemian et al., Paper No. 89-0056, pp. 587-593, (1989). |
| “An Integrated Architecture for Signal Validation in Power Plants,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Third IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug. 24-26, 1988, pp. 1-6. |
| “Integration of Multiple Signal Validation Modules for Sensor Monitoring,” by B. Upadhyaya et al., Department of Nuclear Engineering, Jul. 8, 1990, pp. 1-6. |
| “Intelligent Behaviour for Self-Validating Sensors”, by M.P. Henry, Advances in Measurement, pp. 1-7, (May 1990). |
| “Measurement of the Temperature Fluctuation in a Resistor Generating 1/F Fluctuation,” by S. Hashiguchi, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 22, No. 5, Part 2, May 1983, pp. L284-L286. |
| “Check of Semiconductor Thermal Resistance Elements by the Method of Noise Thermometry”, by A. B. Kisilevskii et al., Measurement Techniques, vol. 25, No. 3, Mar. 1982, New York, USA, pp. 244-246. |
| “Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plant Monitoring,” by B. Upadhyaya, International Fast Reactor Safety Meeting, Aug. 12-16, 1990, pp. 2-10. |
| “Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plantwide Monitoring,” by E. Eryurek, 1992. |
| “A New Method of Johnson Noise Thermometry”, by C.J. Borkowski et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 45, No. 2, (Feb. 1974) pp. 151-162. |
| “Thermocouple Continuity Checker,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 1954 (Oct. 1977). |
| “A Self-Validating Thermocouple,” Janice C-Y et al., IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 239-253 (Mar. 1997). |
| Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Chapter IV entitled “Temperature Measurements,” by T.J Claggett, pp. 266-333 (1982). |
| “emWare's Releases EMIT 3.0, Allowing Manufacturers to Internet and Network Enable Devices Royalty Free,” 3 pages, PR Newswire (Nov. 4, 1998). |
| Warrior, J., “The IEEE P1451.1 Object Model Network Independent Interfaces for Sensors and Actuators,” pp. 1-14, Rosemount Inc. (1997). |
| Warrior, J., “The Collision Between the Web and Plant Floor Automation,” 6th. WWW Conference Workshop on Embedded Web Technology, Santa Clara, CA (Apr. 7, 1997). |
| “Internal Statistical Quality Control for Quality Monitoring Instruments”, by P. Girling et al., ISA, 15 pgs., 1999. |
| “Statistical Process Control (Practice Guide Series Book)”, Instrument Society of America, 1995, pp. 1-58 and 169-204. |
| “Time-Frequency Analysis of Transient Pressure Signals for a Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation Study,” ASIAO Journal, by Alex A. Yu et al., vol. 44, No. 5, pp. M475-M479, (Sep.-Oct. 1998) |
| “Caviation in Pumps, Pipes and Valves,” Process Engineering, by Dr. Ronald Young, pp. 47 and 49 (Jan. 1990). |
| “Quantification of Heart Valve Cavitation Based on High Fidelity Pressure Measurements,” Advances in Bioengineering 1994, by Laura A. Garrison et al., BED-vol. 28, pp. 297-298 (Nov. 6-11, 1994). |
| “Monitoring and Diagnosis of Cavitation in Pumps and Valves Using the Wigner Distribution,” Hydroaccoustic Facilities, Instrumentation, and Experimental Techniques, NCA-vol. 10, pp. 31-36 (1991). |
| “Developing Predictive Models for Cavitation Erosion,” Codes and Standards in a Global Environment, PVP-vol. 259, pp. 189-192 (1993). |
| “Self-Diagnosing Intelligent Motors: A Key Enabler for Next Generation Manufacturing System,” by Fred M. Discenzo et al., pp. 3/1-3/4 (1999). |
| “A Microcomputer-Based Instrument for Applications in Platinum Resistance Thermomety,” by H. Rosemary Taylor and Hector A. Navarro, Journal of Physics E. Scientific Instrument, vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 1100-1104 (1983). |
| “Experience in Using Estelle for the Specification and Verification of a Fieldbus Protocol: FIP,” by Barretto et al., Computer Networking, pp. 295-304 (1990). |
| “Computer Simulation of H1 Field Bus Transmission,” by Utsumi et al., Advances in Instrumentation and Control, vol. 46, Part 2, pp. 1815-1827 (1991). |
| “Progress in Fieldbus Developments for Measuring and Control Application,” by A. Schwaier, Sensor and Acuators, pp. 115-119 (1991). |
| “Ein Emulationssystem zur Leistungsanalyse von Feldbussystemen, Teil 1,” by R. Hoyer, pp. 335-336 (1991). |
| “Simulatore Integrato: Controllo su bus di campo,” by Barabino et al., Automazione e Strumentazione, pp. 85-91 (Oct. 1993). |
| “Ein Modulares, verteiltes Diagnose-Expertensystem für die Fehlerdiagnose in lokalen Netzen,” by Jürgen M. Schröder, pp. 557-565 (1990). |
| “Fault Diagnosis of Fieldbus Systems,” by Jürgen Quade, pp. 577-581 (Oct. 1992). |
| “Ziele und Anwendungen von Feldbussystemen,” by T. Pfeifer et al., pp. 549-557 (Oct. 1987). |
| “Profibus Infrastructure Measures,” by Tilo Pfeifer et al., pp. 416-419 (Aug. 1991). |
| “Simulation the Time Behaviour of Fieldbus Systems,” by O. Schnelle, pp. 440-442 (1991). |
| “Field Bus Networks for Automation Systems Containing Intelligent Functional Unites,” by W. Kriesel et al., pp. 486-489 (1987). |
| “Field Buses for Process Interconnection with Digital Control Systems,” Tecnología, pp. 141-147 (1990). |
| “Decentralised Systems with Real-Time Field Bus,” Netzwerke, Jg. Nr.3 v. 14.3, 4 pages (1990). |
| “Process Measurement and Analysis,” by Liptak et al., Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Third Edition, pp. 528-530, (1995). |
| “Improving Dynamic Performance of Temperature Sensors With Fuzzy Control Techniques,” by Wang Lei et al., pp. 872-873 (1992). |
| “Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary” 2nd Edition, 1994, Microsoft Press. p. 156. |
| International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US01/40791 with international filing date of May 22, 2001. |
| International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US01/40782 with international filing date of May 22, 2001. |
| International Search Report from Application No. PCT/02/14560 with international filing date of May 8, 2002. |
| International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US02/14934 with international filing date of May 8, 2002. |
| “On-Line Tool Condition Monitoring System With Wavelet Fuzzy Neural Network,” by Li Xiaoli et al., pp. 271-276 (1997). |
| “Optimal Design of the Coils of An Electromagnetic Flow Meter,” by Michalski, A. et al., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 34, Issue 5, Part 1, pp. 2563-2566 (1998). |
| “Magnetic Fluid Flow Meter for Gases,” Popa, N. C., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 30, Issue 2, Part 1-2, pp. 936-938 (1993). |
| “New Approach to a Main Error Estimation for Primary Transducer of Electromagnetic Flow Meter,” by Michalski, A., IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 1093-1097 (1998). |
| “Additional Information From Flowmeters Via Signal Analysis,” by Amadi-Echendu, J.E. et al., IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Record, vol. 7, pp. 187-193 (1990). |
| International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US02/06606 with international filing date of Mar. 5, 2002. |
| International Search Report from Application No. PCT/US02/30465 with international filing date of Sep. 25, 2002. |
| “What is a weighted moving average?”, Dau Stat Refresher, http://cne.gmu.edu/modules/dau/stat/mvavgs/wma—bdy.html. (1995). |
| “Statistics Glossary: Time Series Data”, by Easton et al., http://www.stats.gla.ac.uk/steps/glossary/time—series.html , Sep. 1997. |
| “The Indicators Story”, Sustainable Seattle, pp. 55-59, 1998. |
| “Detecting Regimes in Temperature Time Series”, by Clemins et al., Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering, Proceedings, pp. 727-732, 2001. |
| “Re: Digital Filter-Moving Average”, The Math Forumn, http://mathforum.org/discuss/sci.math/a/t/177212, Sep. 28, 1998. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, or the Declaration for PCT/US2004/017300. |
| “Invitation to Pay Additional Fees” for PCT/US2004/031678. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration”, PCT/US2004/025291. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration”, PCT/US2004/031678. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration”, PCT/US2005/011385. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patenatability”, PCT/US2004/031678. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion”, PCT/US2004/022736. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report”, PCT/US00/14798. |
| “Invitation to Pay Additional Fees”, PCT/US2004/031678. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion”, PCT/US2004/022736. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report” PCT/US00/14798. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/439,095. |
| “Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial Search Report” for PCT/US2007/0011428, dated Oct. 8, 2008. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration” for PCT/US2008/009394 filed Aug. 5, 2008; 13 pages. |
| Eryurek et al., “Advanced Diagnostics Achieved with Intelligent Sensors and Fieldbus”, 2001, Measuremnet and Control vol. 34, p. 293-311. |
| First Office Action from corresponding Chinese Application No. 200780035735.6, dated Mar. 15, 2011, 4 pages. |
| Rezabek, John “Field Device Complications”, InTech, Apr. 1, 2006, HighBeam Research Online database, www.highbeam.com, 2 pages. |
| First Office Action from corresponding Chinese Application No. 200880102161.4, dated Jul. 6, 2011, 20 pages. |
| First Office Action from corresponding Russian Application No. 2010108301, dated Apr. 29, 2011, 16 pages. |
| Office Action from European Application No. 07836452.8, Dated Jun. 6, 2011. |
| Office Action from corresponding Japanese Application No. 2009-524611, dated Jul. 26, 2011, 7 pages. |
| Reeves-T., “Optimizing Process Equipment Performance”, 2005, Emerson Process Management, 5 pages. |
| PlantWeb, “Improving Availability” Emerson White Paper, 2003, 15 pages. |
| PlantWeb, “Reducing Operations & Maintenance Costs”, 2003, 18 pages. |
| Office Action from corresponding European Application No. 08795030.9, Dated Nov. 4, 2011. |
| International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/017301, dated Apr. 11, 2008, 4 pages. |
| Written Opinion for International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/017301, dated Apr. 11, 2008, 7 pages. |
| Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/012317, dated Dec. 17, 2007, 11 pages. |
| Office Action (English translation) from Chinese Application No. 200780030039.6, dated Dec. 1, 2010, 8 pages. |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for corresponding European Application No. 07 838 659.6-2206, dated Nov. 18, 2011, 7 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action (English translation) for corresponding Chinese Application No. 200780030039.6, dated Nov. 25, 2011, 8 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action (with English translation) for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2010-519967, dated Feb. 7, 2012, 11 pages. |
| Second Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880102161.4, dated May 3, 2012, 6 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,694,936, dated Oct. 16, 2012, 6 pages. |
| Rejection Decision from Chinese patent application No. 2007800357356, dated Mar. 28, 2012, 6 pages. |
| Second Office Action from Japanese patent application No. 2009530377, dated May 22, 2012, 5 pages. |
| Rejection Decision from Chinese patent application No. 2010-519967, dated Aug. 9, 2012, 9 pages. |
| Summons to attend oral proceeding from the corresponding European Patent Application No. 07838659.6, dated Jan. 29, 2013. |
| Decision of Rejection for European Patent Application No. 07838659.6, dated Jul. 3, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Reexamination Notification for Chinese Patent Application No. 2007800357356, dated May 3, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009530377, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 2 pages. |
| Summons to attend Oral Proceeding for European Patent Application No. 07838659.6, dated Jan. 29, 2013, 6 pages. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion”, PCT/US2006/037535, May 10, 2007. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion”, PCT/US2007/012317, Dec. 17, 2007. |
| Samson, Technical Information; HART Communication, Part 4 Communications; 40 pp, 1999. |
| “A Supervision Support System for Industrial Processes” by J. Penalva et al., IEEE, Oct. 1993, pp. 57-65. |
| “International Search Report” for related Application No. PCT/US2007/017301, Apr. 11, 2008. |
| “Written Opinion” for related Application No. PCT/US2007/017301, Apr. 11, 2008. |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200780030039.6, dated Dec. 1, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/834,221, filed Aug. 6, 2007. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2006/006899, filed Feb. 28, 2006. |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200680005015.0, dated Aug. 15, 2008. |
| Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200680005015.0, dated Feb. 9, 2009. |
| Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-519967, dated Feb. 7, 2012. |
| Canadian Office Action for Canadian App. No. 2,694,936, dated Oct. 16, 2012. |
| “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Flow Induced Pipe Vibration in Fully Developed Flow”, by Pittard et al., Jul. 2004, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 75, No. 7, pp. 2393-2401. |
| “Wireless Sensing of Flow-Induced Vibrations for Pipeline Integrity Monitoring”, by Awawdeh et al., 2006, IEEE, pp. 114-117. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/061170, filed Sep. 23, 2013, 9 pgs. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2014 in related application Serial No. 2,694,936, 7 pgs. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/044144, dated Apr. 1, 2014. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, or the Declaration for PCT/US2012/055733, dated Jul. 3, 2013. |
| Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC for European Patent Application No. 12780913.5-1557, dated May 22, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Official Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201110303797.9, dated Apr. 22, 2014. |
| “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, or the Declaration for PCT/US027409, dated Oct. 17, 2012. |
| Communication regarding EP Application No. 12713813.9-1802, dated Nov. 8, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090043530 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |