Process variable transmitters are used in industrial process control environments and couple to the process fluid and provide measurements relative to the process. Process variable transmitters can be configured to monitor one or more process variables associated with fluids in a process plant such as slurries, liquids, vapors and gasses in chemical, pulp, petroleum, gas, pharmaceutical, food and other fluid processing plants. The monitored process variables can be pressure, temperature, flow, level, pH, conductivity, turbidity, density, concentration, chemical composition or other properties of fluids. Process variable transmitter includes one or more sensors that can be either internal to the transmitter or external to the transmitter, depending on the installation needs of the process plant. Process variable transmitters generate one or more transmitter outputs that represent the sensed process variable. Transmitter outputs are configured for transmission over long distances to a controller or indicator via communication buses 242. In typical fluid processing plants, a communication bus 242 can be a 4-20 mA current loop that powers the transmitter, or a fieldbus connection, a HART protocol communication or a fiber optic connection to a controller, a control system or a readout. In transmitters powered by a 2 wire loop, power must be kept low to provide intrinsic safety in explosive atmospheres.
One type of process variable transmitter is known as a pressure transmitter. Typically, a pressure transmitter will be coupled to the process fluid through impulse lines. Pressure transmitter operation can easily deteriorate if one or both of the impulse lines becomes plugged.
Disassembly and inspection of the impulse lines is one method used to detect and correct plugging of lines. Another known method for detecting plugging is to periodically add a “check pulse” to the measurement signal from a pressure transmitter. This check pulse causes a control system connected to the transmitter to disturb the flow. If the pressure transmitter fails to accurately sense the flow disturbance, an alarm signal is generated indicating line plugging. Another known method for detecting plugging is sensing of both static and differential pressures. If there is inadequate correlation between oscillations in the static and differential pressures, then an alarm signal is generated indicating line plugging. Still another known method for detecting line plugging is to sense static pressures and pass them through high pass and low pass filters. Noise signals obtained from the filters are compared to a threshold, and if variance in the noise is less than the threshold, then an alarm signal indicates that the line is blocked.
These known methods use techniques which can increase the complexity and reduce reliability of the devices. Moreover, while these methods can sometimes detect a plugged impulse line, they generally cannot detect when deposits begin to collect within the impulse line, but do not yet plug the impulse line. Thus, operation may continue even though the pressure transmitter's ability to sense pressure has been compromised to some extent. There is thus a need for a better diagnostic technology providing more predictive, less reactive maintenance for reducing cost or improving reliability.
A process variable transmitter with diagnostics based on power spectral density (PSD) analysis of a process variable sensor signal is provided. In one embodiment, the process variable transmitter is a pressure transmitter and the diagnostics are used to diagnose impulse line obstruction or impending obstruction. Other diagnostics are also useful such as diagnosing primary element degradation. The sensor signal is digitized and the digitized signal is transferred into the frequency domain. The power of the frequencies on the sensor signal is examined to provide the enhanced diagnostics. In one aspect diagnostics are generated directly with the sensor PSD data. In another aspect, the PSD analysis is used to tune a filter in order to enhance traditional diagnostic algorithms.
Embodiments of the present invention generally perform a spectral analysis to generate diagnostic information relative to a process variable transmitter. This analysis is described as occurring within a microprocessor system within the process variable transmitter, but can be performed by any suitable processing system. The processing system 88 can perform a wavelet transformation, discrete wavelet transformation, Fourier transformation, or use other techniques to determine the spectrum of the sensor signal. The power of the distributed frequencies is determined by monitoring such a converted signal over time. One example of this is the power spectral density (PSD). The power spectral density can be defined as the power (or variance) of a time series and can be described as how the power (or variance) of a time series is distributed with frequency. For example, this can be defined as the Fourier transform of an auto-correlation sequence of the time series. Another definition of power spectral density is the squared modulus of the Fourier transform of the time series, scaled by an appropriate constant term.
In
In
In
In one embodiment of the present invention, analog-to-digital converter is a known Sigma-Delta converter providing 22 conversions per second. In this embodiment, each converted digital representation of the process variable becomes a data point for Power Spectral Density (PSD) analysis. Preferably, a 32 point Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is applied to the digital process data points to generate PSD information. Since the PSD analysis operates using a known analog-to-digital converter operating in a known manner, this embodiment of the present invention can be implemented wholly in software by adapting the operation of microprocessor system 88. Thus, embodiments of the present invention can be applied to process variable transmitters that are currently installed in the field, or already manufactured, without having to modify their circuitry. Algorithms for performing the PSD analysis are set forth below.
Sigma-Delta converters are often used in the process measurement and control industry due to their fast conversion times and high accuracy. Sigma-Delta converters generally employ an internal capacitor charge pumping scheme that generates a digital bitstream that is analyzed, generally by counting positive 1's over a set interval. For example, one Sigma-Delta converter currently in use provides a bitstream signal consisting of 50% 1's to indicate the minimum pressure measurement, and 75% 1's to indicate the maximum pressure measurement. The digital bitstream is generally filtered to remove or attenuate fluctuating components prior to determination of the flow rate. The filtered data is then used with well-known equations to compute either the mass flow rate or the volumetric flow rate.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the digital bitstream within the analog-to-digital converter is used directly for PSD analysis. This bitstream usually has a frequency that is many orders of magnitude higher than the conversion frequency. The digital bitstream can have a frequency in excess of about 55 kHz. For example, a known Sigma-Delta converter provides a digital bitstream that has a frequency of approximately 57 kHz. While those skilled in the art will recognize many ways in which PSD analysis can be performed upon the digital bitstream, a preferred method is as follows. For a given interval, such as ten seconds, digital data from the bitstream is collected and saved. In the example above, 10 seconds of 57 kHz data yields 570,000 stored bits. The DC component can be optionally removed from the stored data by subtracting the average bit value (Number of 1's divided by the total number of bits) from each stored bit. Next, power spectral density is computed on the adjusted data. This is preferably done using a 65536 point FFT and a Hanning Window size of 65536. The size of the FFT was chosen because it is the power of 2 closest to the sampling bit frequency, and given a duration of ten seconds, it provides acceptable averaging of the spectrum. However, other sizes may be used in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
Power spectral density, Fi, can be calculated using Welch's method of averaged periodograms for a given data set. The method uses a measurement sequence x(n) sampled at fs samples per second, where n=1, 2, . . . N. A front end filter with a filter frequency less than fs/2 is used to reduce aliasing in the spectral calculations. The data set is divided into Fk,i as shown in Eq. 1:
There are Fk,i overlapping data segments and for each segment, a periodogram is calculated where M is the number of points in the current segment. After all periodograms for all segments are evaluated, all of them are averaged to calculate the power spectrum:
Once a power spectrum is obtained for a training mode, this sequence is stored in memory, preferably EEPROM, as the baseline power spectrum for comparison to real time power spectrums. Fi is thus the power spectrum sequence and i goes from 1 to N which is the total number of points in the original data sequence. N, usually a power of 2, also sets the frequency resolution of the spectrum estimation. Therefore, Fi is also known as the signal strength at the ith frequency. The power spectrum typically includes a large number points at predefined frequency intervals, defining a shape of the spectral power distribution as a function of frequency.
In the performance of diagnostics using power spectral density, a relatively larger sample of the spectral density at baseline historical conditions and a relatively smaller sample of the spectral density at monitoring conditions are compared. The relatively smaller sample allows for a real time indication of problems in about 1 second. An increase in the related frequency components of the power spectrum can indicate the degradation of one or both impulse lines, and/or of the primary element.
Microprocessor system 88 receives the series of digital representations (either individual digital conversions, or digital bitstream, or any combination thereof. Microprocessor system 88 has an algorithm stored therein that compares PSD data during a monitoring mode with PSD data acquired during a training mode. This comparison allows the process variable transmitter to detect fault that can affect the process variable measurement. This fault can be the plugging of impulse lines in a pressure transmitter, the deterioration of a primary element, or any other factor. System 88 generates diagnostic data 62 as a function of the current data set relative to the historical. A digital to analog converter 96 coupled to the microprocessor system 88 generates an analog transmitter output 98 indicative of the sensed flow rate. A digital communication circuit 100 receives the diagnostic data 94 from the microprocessor system 88 and generates a transmitter output 102 indicating the diagnostic data. The analog output 98 and the diagnostic data 102 can be coupled to indicators or controllers as desired.
While many embodiments of the present invention employ PSD analysis of process sensor data for providing diagnostics directly, one embodiment does not.
Any of the methods can be stored on a computer-readable medium as a plurality of sequences of instructions, the plurality of sequences of instructions including sequences that, when executed by a microprocessor system in a pressure transmitter cause the pressure transmitter to perform a diagnostic method relative to a primary element and impulse lines couplable to the transmitter.
In one embodiment, microprocessor system 88 includes signal preprocessor which is coupled to sensor 31 through analog to digital converter 84 which isolates signal components in the sensor signal such as frequencies, amplitudes or signal characteristics which are related to a plugged impulse line 30 or degraded primary element 28. The signal preprocessor provides an isolated signal output to a signal evaluator in microprocessor 88. The signal preprocessor isolates a portion of the signal by filtering, performing a wavelet transform, performing a Fourier transform, use of a neural network, statistical analysis, or other signal evaluation techniques. Such preprocessing is preferably implemented in microprocessor 88 or in a specialized digital signal processor. The isolated signal output is related to a plugged or plugging impulse line 30 or degraded primary element 28 sensed by sensor 31.
The signal components are isolated through signal processing techniques in which only desired frequencies or other signal characteristics such as amplitude are identified and an indication of their identification is provided. Depending upon the strength signals to be detected and their frequency, signal preprocessor can comprise a filter, for example a band pass filter, to generate the isolated signal output. For more sensitive isolation, advanced signal processing techniques are utilized such as a Fast Fourier transform (FFT) to obtain the spectrum of the sensor signal. In one embodiment, the signal preprocessor comprises a wavelet processor which performs a wavelet analysis on the sensor signal as shown in
Wavelet analysis is a technique for transforming a time domain signal into the frequency domain which, like a Fourier transformation, allows the frequency components to be identified. However, unlike a Fourier transformation, in a wavelet transformation the output includes information related to time. This may be expressed in the form of a three dimensional graph with time shown on one axis, frequency on a second axis and signal amplitude on a third axis. A discussion of wavelet analysis is given in On-Line Tool Condition Monitoring System With Wavelet Fuzzy Neural Network, by L. Xiaoli et al., 8 JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING pgs. 271-276 (1997). In performing a continuous wavelet transformation, a portion of the sensor signal is windowed and convolved with a wavelet function. This convolution is performed by superimposing the wavelet function at the beginning of a sample, multiplying the wavelet function with the signal and then integrating the result over the sample period. The result of the integration is scaled and provides the first value for continuous wavelet transform at time equals zero. This point may be then mapped onto a three dimensional plane. The wavelet function is then shifted right (forward in time) and the multiplication and integration steps are repeated to obtain another set of data points which are mapped onto the 3-D space. This process is repeated and the wavelet is moved (convolved) through the entire signal. The wavelet function is then scaled, which changes the frequency resolution of the transformation, and the above steps are repeated.
Data from a wavelet transformation of a sensor signal from sensor 31 is shown in
The continuous wavelet transformation described above requires extensive computations. Therefore, in one embodiment, microprocessor system 88 performs a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) which is well suited for implementation in microprocessor system. One efficient discrete wavelet transform uses the Mallat algorithm, which is a two channel sub-band coder. The Mallet algorithm provides a series of separated or decomposed signals which are representative of individual frequency components of the original signal.
In some embodiments, padding is added to the signal by adding data to the sensor signal near the borders of windows used in the wavelet analysis. This padding reduces distortions in the frequency domain output. This technique can be used with a continuous wavelet transform or a discrete wavelet transform. “Padding” is defined as appending extra data on either side of the current active data window, for example, extra data points are added which extend 25% of the current window beyond either window edge. In one embodiment, the padding is generated by repeating a portion of the data in the current window so that the added data “pads” the existing signal on either side. The entire data set is then fit to a quadratic equation which is used to extrapolate the signal 25% beyond the active data window.
Microprocessor 88 evaluates the isolated signal received from the signal preprocessing and in one embodiment, monitors an amplitude of a certain frequency or range of frequencies identified and provides a diagnostic output if a threshold is exceeded. Signal evaluator can also comprise more advanced decision making algorithms such as fuzzy logic, neural networks, expert systems, rule based systems, etc. Commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,143 describes various decision making systems which can be implemented in signal evaluator 154 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Microprocessor 88 performs diagnostics related to the impulse piping or primary element using information derived from the differential pressure sensor 31. The following describes a number of embodiments for realizing a diagnostic circuit. The diagnostic circuit can provide a residual lifetime estimate, an indication of a failure, an indication of an impending failure or a calibration output which is used to correct for errors in the sensed process variable.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, various function blocks of the invention have been described in terms of circuitry, however, many function blocks may be implemented in other forms such as digital and analog circuits, software and their hybrids. When implemented in software, a microprocessor performs the functions and the signals comprise digital values on which the software operates. A general purpose processor programmed with instructions that cause the processor to perform the desired process elements, application specific hardware components that contain circuit wired to perform the desired elements and any combination of programming a general purpose processor and hardware components can be used. Deterministic or fuzzy logic techniques can be used as needed to make decisions in the circuitry or software. Because of the nature of complex digital circuitry, circuit elements may not be partitioned into separate blocks as shown, but components used for various functional blocks can be intermingled and shared. Likewise with software, some instructions can be shared as part of several functions and be intermingled with unrelated instructions within the scope of the invention. The diagnostic output can be a predictive indicator of a future failure, such as the future partial or complete plugging of an impulse line. The diagnostics can be applied to impulse piping and/or primary elements. Finally, although various embodiments of the present invention have been described with respect to a pressure transmitter, embodiments of the present invention can be practiced with any process device where a sensor is coupled to the process device through an analog-to-digital converter.
This is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 10/801,073, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,254,518, filed Mar. 15, 2004 entitled Pressure Transmitter With Diagnostics, which application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/852,102, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,907,383, filed May 9, 2001, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/257,896, now abandoned, filed Feb. 25, 1999, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/623,569, filed Mar. 28, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,143; application Ser. No. 09/852,102 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,907,383, is also a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/383,828, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,654,697, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/257,896, now abandoned, filed Feb. 25, 1999 which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/623,569, filed Mar. 28, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,143.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3096434 | King | Jul 1963 | A |
3404264 | Kugler | Oct 1968 | A |
3468164 | Sutherland | Sep 1969 | A |
3590370 | Fleischer | Jun 1971 | A |
3618592 | Stewart | Nov 1971 | A |
3688190 | Blum | Aug 1972 | A |
3691842 | Akeley | Sep 1972 | A |
3701280 | Stroman | Oct 1972 | A |
3849637 | Caruso et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3855858 | Cushing | Dec 1974 | A |
3948098 | Richardson et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3952759 | Ottenstein | Apr 1976 | A |
3973184 | Raber | Aug 1976 | A |
RE29383 | Gallatin et al. | Sep 1977 | E |
4058975 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4099413 | Ohte et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4102199 | Talpouras | Jul 1978 | A |
4122719 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4249164 | Tivy | Feb 1981 | A |
4250490 | Dahlke | Feb 1981 | A |
4279013 | Cameron et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4337516 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4399824 | Davidson | Aug 1983 | A |
4417312 | Cronin et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4459858 | Marsh | Jul 1984 | A |
4463612 | Thompson | Aug 1984 | A |
4517468 | Kemper et al. | May 1985 | A |
4528869 | Kubo et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4530234 | Cullick et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4536753 | Parker | Aug 1985 | A |
4540468 | Genco et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4571689 | Hildebrand et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4630265 | Sexton | Dec 1986 | A |
4635214 | Kasai et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4642782 | Kemper et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4644479 | Kemper et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649515 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4668473 | Agarwal | May 1987 | A |
4686638 | Furuse | Aug 1987 | A |
4707796 | Calabro et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720806 | Schippers et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4736367 | Wroblewski et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4736763 | Britton et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4758308 | Carr | Jul 1988 | A |
4777585 | Kokawa et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4807151 | Citron | Feb 1989 | A |
4818994 | Orth et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831564 | Suga | May 1989 | A |
4841286 | Kummer | Jun 1989 | A |
4853693 | Eaton-Williams | Aug 1989 | A |
4873655 | Kondraske | Oct 1989 | A |
4907167 | Skeirik | Mar 1990 | A |
4924418 | Backman et al. | May 1990 | A |
4926364 | Brotherton | May 1990 | A |
4934196 | Romano | Jun 1990 | A |
4939753 | Olson | Jul 1990 | A |
4964125 | Kim | Oct 1990 | A |
4988990 | Warrior | Jan 1991 | A |
4992965 | Holter et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5005142 | Lipchak et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019760 | Chu et al. | May 1991 | A |
5025344 | Maly et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5043862 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053815 | Wendell | Oct 1991 | A |
5057774 | Verhelst et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067099 | McCown et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5081598 | Bellows et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5083091 | Frick et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5089979 | McEachern et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5089984 | Struger et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5098197 | Shepard et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5099436 | McCown et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103409 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5111531 | Grayson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121467 | Skeirik | Jun 1992 | A |
5122794 | Warrior | Jun 1992 | A |
5122976 | Bellows et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130936 | Sheppard et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134574 | Beaverstock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5137370 | McCullock et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142612 | Skeirik | Aug 1992 | A |
5143452 | Maxedon et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148378 | Shibayama et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150289 | Badavas | Sep 1992 | A |
5167009 | Skeirik | Nov 1992 | A |
5175678 | Frerichs et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5193143 | Kaemmerer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197114 | Skeirik | Mar 1993 | A |
5197328 | Fitzgerald | Mar 1993 | A |
5212765 | Skeirik | May 1993 | A |
5214582 | Gray | May 1993 | A |
5216226 | Miyoshi | Jun 1993 | A |
5224203 | Skeirik | Jun 1993 | A |
5228780 | Shepard et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235527 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5265031 | Malczewski | Nov 1993 | A |
5265222 | Nishiya et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269311 | Kirchner et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274572 | O'Neill et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282131 | Rudd et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282261 | Skeirik | Jan 1994 | A |
5293585 | Morita | Mar 1994 | A |
5303181 | Stockton | Apr 1994 | A |
5305230 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311421 | Nomura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317520 | Castle | May 1994 | A |
5327357 | Feinstein et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333240 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5340271 | Freeman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347843 | Orr et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349541 | Alexandro, Jr. et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5357449 | Oh | Oct 1994 | A |
5361628 | Marko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365423 | Chand | Nov 1994 | A |
5365787 | Hernandez et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367612 | Bozich et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5384699 | Levy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386373 | Keeler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388465 | Okaniwa et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392293 | Hsue | Feb 1995 | A |
5394341 | Kepner | Feb 1995 | A |
5394543 | Hill et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404064 | Mermelstein et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408406 | Mathur et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408586 | Skeirik | Apr 1995 | A |
5410495 | Ramamurthi | Apr 1995 | A |
5414645 | Hirano | May 1995 | A |
5419197 | Ogi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430642 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434774 | Seberger | Jul 1995 | A |
5436705 | Raj | Jul 1995 | A |
5440478 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442639 | Crowder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5467355 | Umeda et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469070 | Koluvek | Nov 1995 | A |
5469156 | Kogura | Nov 1995 | A |
5469735 | Watanabe | Nov 1995 | A |
5469749 | Shimada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5481199 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481200 | Voegele et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483387 | Bauhahn et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485753 | Burns et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486996 | Samad et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488697 | Kaemmerer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489831 | Harris | Feb 1996 | A |
5495769 | Broden et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5510779 | Maltby et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511004 | Dubost et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526293 | Mozumder et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539638 | Keeler et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548528 | Keeler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555190 | Derby et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560246 | Bottinger et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5561599 | Lu | Oct 1996 | A |
5570034 | Needham et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570300 | Henry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572420 | Lu | Nov 1996 | A |
5573032 | Lenz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578763 | Spencer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591922 | Segeral et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598521 | Kilgore et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600148 | Cole et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608650 | McClendon et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623605 | Keshav et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629870 | Farag et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633809 | Wissenbach et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637802 | Frick et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640491 | Bhat et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644240 | Brugger | Jul 1997 | A |
5654869 | Ohi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661668 | Yemini et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665899 | Willcox | Sep 1997 | A |
5669713 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671335 | Davis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672247 | Pangalos et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675504 | Serodes et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675724 | Beal et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680109 | Lowe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682317 | Keeler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5700090 | Eryurek | Dec 1997 | A |
5703575 | Kirkpatrick | Dec 1997 | A |
5704011 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705754 | Keita et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5705978 | Frick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708211 | Jepson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708585 | Kushion | Jan 1998 | A |
5710370 | Shanahan et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710708 | Wiegand | Jan 1998 | A |
5713668 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719378 | Jackson, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5736649 | Kawasaki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741074 | Wang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742845 | Wagner | Apr 1998 | A |
5746511 | Eryurek et al. | May 1998 | A |
5747701 | Marsh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752008 | Bowling | May 1998 | A |
5764539 | Rani | Jun 1998 | A |
5764891 | Warrior | Jun 1998 | A |
5781024 | Blomberg et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781878 | Mizoguchi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790413 | Bartusiak et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801689 | Huntsman | Sep 1998 | A |
5805442 | Crater et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817950 | Wiklund et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825664 | Warrior et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828567 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829876 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848383 | Yuuns | Dec 1998 | A |
5854993 | Crichnik | Dec 1998 | A |
5859964 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5869772 | Storer | Feb 1999 | A |
5876122 | Eryurek | Mar 1999 | A |
5880376 | Sai et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887978 | Lunghofer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5908990 | Cummings | Jun 1999 | A |
5923557 | Eidson | Jul 1999 | A |
5924086 | Mathur et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926778 | Pöppel | Jul 1999 | A |
5934371 | Bussear et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936514 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940290 | Dixon | Aug 1999 | A |
5956663 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970430 | Burns et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6002952 | Diab et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004017 | Madhavan | Dec 1999 | A |
6014612 | Larson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014902 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016523 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016706 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017143 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023399 | Kogure | Feb 2000 | A |
6026352 | Burns et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038579 | Sekine | Mar 2000 | A |
6045260 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6046642 | Brayton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047220 | Eryurek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047222 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052655 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061603 | Papadopoulos et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072150 | Sheffer | Jun 2000 | A |
6094600 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6112131 | Ghorashi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119047 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119529 | Di Marco et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139180 | Usher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144924 | Dowling et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151560 | Jones | Nov 2000 | A |
6179964 | Begemann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182501 | Furuse et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192281 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195591 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199018 | Quist et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209048 | Wolff | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236948 | Eck et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237424 | Salmasi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263487 | Stripf et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272438 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289735 | Dister et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298377 | Hartikainen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307483 | Westfield et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311136 | Henry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317701 | Pyostsia et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327914 | Dutton | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347252 | Behr et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356191 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360277 | Ruckley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370448 | Eryurek et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377859 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396426 | Balard et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397114 | Eryurek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405099 | Nagai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425038 | Sprecher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434504 | Eryurek et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449574 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473656 | Langels et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473710 | Eryurek | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480793 | Martin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492921 | Kunitani et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493689 | Kotoulas et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505517 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519546 | Eryurek et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532392 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539267 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546814 | Choe et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556145 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6594603 | Eryurek et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601005 | Eryurek et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611775 | Coursolle et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615149 | Wehrs | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654697 | Eryurek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6701274 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6758168 | Koskinen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6907383 | Eryurek et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915237 | Hashemian | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7010459 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7222049 | Schumacher | May 2007 | B2 |
7254518 | Eryurek et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020013629 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029130 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032544 | Reid et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020077711 | Nixon | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020121910 | Rome et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020145568 | Winter | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020148644 | Schultz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030033040 | Billings | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045962 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040249583 | Eryurek et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050173112 | Kavaklioglu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189017 | Eryurek | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070163362 | Wehrs et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
999950 | Nov 1976 | CA |
1196811 | Oct 1998 | CN |
32 13 866 | Oct 1983 | DE |
35 40 204 | Sep 1986 | DE |
40 08 560 | Sep 1990 | DE |
43 43 747 | Jun 1994 | DE |
44 33 593 | Jun 1995 | DE |
195 02 499 | Aug 1996 | DE |
296 00 609 | Mar 1997 | DE |
197 04 694 | Aug 1997 | DE |
19930660 | Jul 1999 | DE |
199 05 071 | Aug 2000 | DE |
19905071 | Aug 2000 | DE |
299 17 651 | Dec 2000 | DE |
199 47 129 | Apr 2001 | DE |
100 36 971 | Feb 2002 | DE |
102 23 725 | Apr 2003 | DE |
0 122 622 | Oct 1984 | EP |
0 413 814 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 487 419 | May 1992 | EP |
0 512 794 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 594 227 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 624 847 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 644 470 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 697 586 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0 749 057 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 825 506 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 827 096 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 838 768 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 807 804 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1 058 093 | May 1999 | EP |
0 335 957 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 022 626 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 298 511 | Feb 2003 | EP |
2 302 514 | Sep 1976 | FR |
2 334 827 | Jul 1977 | FR |
928704 | Jun 1963 | GB |
1 534 280 | Nov 1978 | GB |
1 534 288 | Nov 1978 | GB |
2 310 346 | Aug 1997 | GB |
2 317 969 | Apr 1998 | GB |
2 342 453 | Apr 2000 | GB |
2 347 232 | Aug 2000 | GB |
56-031573 | Mar 1981 | JP |
57196619 | Feb 1982 | JP |
58-129316 | Aug 1983 | JP |
59-116811 | Jul 1984 | JP |
59-163520 | Sep 1984 | JP |
59-176643 | Oct 1984 | JP |
59-211196 | Nov 1984 | JP |
59-211896 | Nov 1984 | JP |
60-000507 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60-76619 | May 1985 | JP |
60-131495 | Jul 1985 | JP |
60-174915 | Sep 1985 | JP |
62-30915 | Feb 1987 | JP |
62050901 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-080535 | Apr 1987 | JP |
63-169532 | Jul 1988 | JP |
64-01914 | Jan 1989 | JP |
64-72699 | Mar 1989 | JP |
11-87430 | Jul 1989 | JP |
2-05105 | Jan 1990 | JP |
3-229124 | Oct 1991 | JP |
4070906 | Mar 1992 | JP |
5-122768 | May 1993 | JP |
6095882 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06242192 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06-248224 | Oct 1994 | JP |
7-063586 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07234988 | Sep 1995 | JP |
8-054923 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-102241 | Apr 1996 | JP |
08-114638 | May 1996 | JP |
8-136386 | May 1996 | JP |
8-166309 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8-247076 | Sep 1996 | JP |
8-313466 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2712625 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2712701 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2753592 | Mar 1998 | JP |
07225530 | May 1998 | JP |
10-232170 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11-083575 | Mar 1999 | JP |
WO 9425933 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9523361 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9611389 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9612993 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9639617 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9721157 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9725603 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9806024 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9813677 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9814855 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9820469 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9839718 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9919782 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0041050 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0050851 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0055700 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0070531 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0101213 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0119440 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0177766 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0190704 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0227418 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 03081002 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2007021419 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060036404 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10801073 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11205745 | US | |
Parent | 09852102 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 10801073 | US | |
Parent | 09257896 | Feb 1999 | US |
Child | 09852102 | US | |
Parent | 08623569 | Mar 1996 | US |
Child | 09257896 | US | |
Parent | 09383828 | Aug 1999 | US |
Child | 09852102 | US | |
Parent | 09257896 | US | |
Child | 09383828 | US | |
Parent | 08623569 | US | |
Child | 09257896 | US |