This invention relates to multichannel optical communication and in particular to multichannel optical communication involving optical phase conjugators (OPCs).
In multichannel optical communication a multiplicity of channels (often up to 256 channels) carrying information is employed. Each channel carries information imposed on a modulated carrier optical signal within a relatively narrow range of wavelengths—typically a wavelength range between 0.1 Å and 25 Å. Thus as shown in
Newly proposed systems such as discussed in Brener, I. et.al. (2000) “Cancellation of all Kerr Nonlinearities in Long Fiber Spans Using a LiNbO3 Phase Conjugator and Raman Amplification,” Optical Fiber Communications Conference, Post deadline Paper PD 33-1, have contemplated the use of OPCs in addition to other devices such as distributed Raman amplifiers. An OPC has the effect of inducing a conjugation of the phase of a signal and has been contemplated for use to reduce the problems associated with nonlinear effects in optical fibers. As more devices are added to optical communication systems the combined effect on a signal especially in a multichannel environment becomes complex.
It has been appreciated that after propagation through an OPC the resulting signal in a multichannel system corresponding to channels 31, 32, 33 is conjugated and has been changed in frequency to 31′, 32′, 33′, respectively as shown in
By a specific set of optical operations it is possible to correct channel order reversal and frequency shift without compromising the desired modification in phase produced by an OPC. This set of three operations includes the demultiplexing of the multichannel optical signal, the use of an OPC or a frequency shifter for at least one of the demultiplexed channels, and the multiplexing of at least one of the channels treated with the OPC or with the frequency shifter with at least one other channel—whether or not this second channel has undergone an OPC or a frequency shifter. Thus, in the context of this invention, one of two possible demultiplexing/multiplexing (DM) sequences is used, i.e. a demultiplexer then an OPC for each channel to be conjugated then a multiplexer is used in a combination denominated a conjugator DM sequence or similarly a demultiplexer then a frequency shifter for individual channels and then a multiplexer is used in a combination denominated a frequency shifter DM. This set of three generic operations (in the context of this invention denominated a DM sequence to encompass both conjugator DMs and frequency shifter DMs) is used together with a complementary operation i.e. an OPC if a frequency shifter is used in the DM sequence or frequency shifter if an OPC is used in the DM sequence. For example, the use of two OPCs on the multiplexed signal operates as a frequency shifter i.e. does not change the phase or channel order of the multiplexed multichannel signal that propagates through it but shifts the channel frequencies. Such frequency shifter is a complementary device to a conjugator DM sequence. The conjugator DM conjugates the phase of OPC treated channels, leaves the order of the OPC treated channels but shifts the frequency of the treated signals. As a complement a frequency shifter does not conjugate the phase of the channels but shifts the frequency to correct for the frequency shift induced by the conjugator DM sequence. It is possible to employ a frequency shifter sequence (or single operation) before the conjugator DM sequence, after the conjugator DM sequence, or perform part of the frequency shifter sequence before the conjugator DM sequence and the remainder after the conjugator DM sequence.
Analogously, a frequency shifter DM shifts the frequency and order of the channels while the complementary OPC conjugates the phase of the channels and restores the channel order. The same effect is attainable whether the OPC is used before or after the frequency shifter DM. It is also possible to use individual OPCs or frequency shifters in the DM sequence on bands of channels rather than on single channels. In this manner the reversal of bands of channels, not individual channels, is accomplished. Thus in the context of this invention, the term channel includes a band that is less than all the channels of the signal.
As discussed the invention involves the use of a DM sequence in conjunction with a complementary operation. Although the invention is generic to this concept, for pedagogic reasons the invention is described with respect to five advantageous embodiments. However the invention is not limited merely to such embodiments. With respect to each embodiment, useful device combinations to implement each embodiment are shown in
In the first embodiment the frequency shifter includes two OPCs and the multichannel signal is first subjected in sequence to both these OPCs to accomplish the frequency shift. (For purposes of illustration the description will be in terms of three channels having three different center wavelengths. However the invention irrespective of particular embodiment is not limited to any specific number of channels and three is chosen solely to simplify the description. Similarly two OPC operations are used to exemplify a frequency shifter. It is however possible to accomplish such a frequency shift either in one operation or in a sequence of operations. Nevertheless the frequency shifter used whether it is a single device used to perform a single operation or a sequence of operations performed with a multitude of devices is equally applicable to the invention.)
Thus in the context of three channels, 31, 32, and 33, in
The multiplexed channels 31″, 32″, and 33″ are then demultiplexed. It is possible for the amount of frequency shift, however, to vary with the channel. All or some of these channels are then subjected to an individual OPC tailored for such channel. That is, the OPC for each such demultiplexed channel has a different pump wavelength so that the channel(s) undergoing this phase conjugation is shifted, for example, essentially back to its original frequency. (Again for ease of description the discussion will be in terms of all three demultiplexed channels being shifted although this is not required in every embodiment of the invention i.e. compensating shifts for only a portion of all the channels is possible.)
Thus as shown in
The overall effect of the conjugator DM sequence is to conjugate the phase of the channels subjected to their individual OPCs and to individually shift the frequency of each treated channels without dependence on another channel. (Although in a preferred embodiment the channels are shifted back to their original frequencies, it is possible, and within the inventive context of all embodiments to shift the channels to a frequency that is other than the original channel frequencies while maintaining the original order of the channels and conjugating their phase.) The beneficial results of the combination of conjugator DM sequence with the complementary device, a frequency shifter, is to conjugate the phase of chosen channels while maintaining the order of desired channels and while adjusting channel frequency without being limited to the effect dictated such as shown in
In a second embodiment, a conjugator DM sequence is performed before the complementary frequency shifter. Thus as shown in
In a third embodiment a portion of a frequency shifting sequence is first performed, then the conjugator DM sequence is performed, and finally the remainder of the frequency shift sequence is performed. As shown in
In a fourth embodiment, channels 101, 102, and 103 in
In a fifth embodiment, channels 111, 112, and 113 in
As previously discussed, the five embodiments are described in detail for pedagogic purposes. Not all channels need be subjected to the DM sequence; the frequency shifter need not necessarily be two OPCs and; the number of channels need not be three. Additionally the specific frequency of the pump is not critical provided the frequency of the pumps used in the frequency shifter sequence relative to the frequency used in the DM sequence is such that the combined frequency shift is the one desired. It is also preferable that the pump frequency of an OPC is not within 250 gigabits of a channel that it is processing. The invention described is useful in conjunction with the approach to reducing the penalty associated with nonlinear effects described in concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/442,287 dated May 20, 2003 (Chowdhury 5-8, filed by Aref Chowdhury, et.al.) which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5365362 | Gnauck et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5400164 | Kurtzke et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5532868 | Gnauck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5777770 | Naito | Jul 1998 | A |
5798853 | Watanabe | Aug 1998 | A |
6160942 | Watanabe | Dec 2000 | A |
6486989 | Shinoda | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6504972 | Watanabe | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6626592 | Watanabe | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6665113 | Aso et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6704519 | Brener et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724997 | Oksanen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6744553 | Islam et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751421 | Ranka et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6771853 | Watanabe | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6943935 | Bickham et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963675 | Watanabe | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7016583 | Downie et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7061664 | Aso et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068938 | Islam et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
20030072513 | Gingener et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040008403 | Kondoh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040234274 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |