Processes for forming composite structures with a two-dimensional material using a porous, non-sacrificial supporting layer

Abstract
It can be difficult to remove atomically thin films, such as graphene, graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials, from a growth substrate and then to transfer the thin films to a secondary substrate. Tearing and conformality issues can arise during the removal and transfer processes. Processes for forming a composite structure by manipulating a two-dimensional material, such as graphene or graphene-base material, can include: providing a two-dimensional material adhered to a growth substrate; depositing a supporting layer on the two-dimensional material while the two-dimensional material is adhered to the growth substrate; and releasing the two-dimensional material from the growth substrate, the two-dimensional material remaining in contact with the supporting layer following release of the two-dimensional material from the growth substrate.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.


FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to atomically thin films, and, more specifically, to processes for manipulating graphene, graphene-based materials and other two-dimensional materials.


BACKGROUND

Graphene represents an atomically thin layer of carbon in which the carbon atoms reside within a single sheet or a few stacked sheets (e.g., about 20 or less) of fused six-membered rings forming an extended planar lattice of interconnected hexagonal molecules, although the planar lattice need not necessarily contain six-membered rings exclusively. In this context, graphene represents a planar arrangement of sp2- and sp-hybridized carbon atoms that may or may not exhibit a long range crystalline order. In its various forms, graphene has garnered widespread interest for use in a number of applications, primarily due to its favorable combination of high electrical and thermal conductivity values, good in-plane mechanical strength, and unique optical and electronic properties. In many aspects, the properties of graphene parallel those of carbon nanotubes, since both nanomaterials are based upon an extended and electrically conjugated carbon framework. Other two-dimensional materials having an extended planar structure are also of interest for various applications. As used herein, the term “two-dimensional material” will refer to any extended planar structure of atomic thickness, including both single- and multi-layer variants thereof. Multi-layer two-dimensional materials can include up to about 20 stacked layers.


Because of its extended planar structure, graphene offers several features that are not shared with carbon nanotubes. Of particular interest to industry are large-area graphene films for applications such as, for example, special barrier layers, coatings, large area conductive elements (e.g., RF radiators or antennas), integrated circuits, transparent electrodes, solar cells, gas barriers, flexible electronics and the like. In addition, graphene films can be produced in bulk much more inexpensively at the present time than can carbon nanotubes.


Large-area graphene films of atomic thicknesses and containing single- or multi-layer graphene can be produced by a variety of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes. CVD growth takes place on a metal-containing growth substrate, such as a copper or nickel foil, and the graphene is strongly adhered to the growth substrate following synthesis. Even the outer graphene layers in multi-layer graphene, which are spatially separated from the surface of the growth substrate, can remain strongly adhered to the growth substrate. The strong adherence of graphene to its growth substrate can make intact removal of the graphene film difficult.


Metal growth substrates are often undesirable for use in downstream applications utilizing a graphene film. For example, chemical, electrical, or functional incompatibility can result when attempting to utilize a graphene film that is still adhered to or in contact with its metal growth substrate. Accordingly, it can often be desirable to transfer a graphene film from its metal growth substrate onto a secondary substrate, also referred to herein as a “functional substrate” or a “receiving substrate.” The secondary substrate can exhibit properties that are better suited to meet the needs of a particular application.


Removing a graphene film from its growth substrate and subsequently transferring the graphene film to a secondary substrate can be difficult for a number of reasons. Although graphene has high mechanical strength on an atomic basis, it can be fairly fragile on the macroscale once it has been removed from its growth substrate. For example, tearing, fracturing and/or buckling can occur in the process of liberating a graphene film from its growth substrate. Tearing and buckling can produce poor surface conformality and coverage upon transferring the graphene film to a secondary substrate. Some processes for affecting removal of a graphene film from its growth substrate can also produce undesirable chemical damage to the graphene film, which can degrade its desirable properties.


One solution for addressing the difficulties posed by unsupported graphene films involves depositing a supporting layer on the graphene film that temporarily provides mechanical stabilization during the transfer process. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) layers have been used in this regard. Once transfer to the secondary substrate is complete, the supporting layer is removed from the graphene film, meaning that the supporting layer is sacrificial and does not remain associated with the graphene film in its end deployment configuration. The use of a sacrificial supporting layer to promote transfer of graphene films can be undesirable for a number of reasons including, for example, incomplete layer removal following transfer, chemical damage to the graphene film and/or the secondary substrate during the layer removal process, poor surface conformality of the graphene film to the secondary substrate due to constrainment by the supporting layer, and potential incursion of the supporting layer into perforations within the graphene film. Chemicals used to affect removal of the sacrificial supporting layer can often be particularly incompatible with the polymer materials forming the secondary substrate. Further, the additional processing operations needed to deposit and then remove the sacrificial supporting layer can be undesirable from a time and cost standpoint.


In view of the foregoing, facile techniques for manipulating graphene films without using a sacrificial supporting layer would be of considerable benefit in the art. The present disclosure satisfies the foregoing need and provides related advantages as well.


SUMMARY

In various embodiments, processes for manipulating a two-dimensional material are described herein. In some embodiments, the processes can include providing a two-dimensional material adhered to a growth substrate, depositing a supporting layer on the two-dimensional material while the two-dimensional material is adhered to the growth substrate, and releasing the two-dimensional material from the growth substrate. The two-dimensional material remains in contact with the supporting layer following release of the two-dimensional material from the growth substrate.


In some embodiments, processes of the present disclosure can include providing a graphene or graphene-based film adhered to a growth substrate, perforating the film to introduce a plurality of pores therein, depositing a supporting layer on the film while the film is adhered to the growth substrate, and releasing the graphene or graphene-based film from the growth substrate. The graphene or graphene-based film remains in contact with the supporting layer following release of the film from the growth substrate. In some embodiments, the growth substrate includes a metal, and the supporting layer includes a plurality of pores.


In other embodiments, filtration membranes containing a perforated graphene or graphene-based material film and a supporting layer are described herein. The filtration membranes are prepared by a process that includes: providing a graphene or graphene-based film adhered to a growth substrate, perforating the film to introduce a plurality of pores therein, depositing a supporting layer on the film while the film is adhered to the growth substrate, and releasing the film from the growth substrate. The graphene or graphene-based film remains in contact with the supporting layer following release of the film from the growth substrate. In some embodiments, the growth substrate includes a metal, and the supporting layer includes a plurality of pores.


The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features of the present disclosure in order that the detailed description that follows can be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be described hereinafter. These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the description below taken in conjunction with the drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions to be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings describing specific embodiments of the disclosure, wherein:



FIG. 1 shows an illustrative schematic of a graphene or graphene-based film sandwiched between a growth substrate and a supporting layer;



FIG. 2 shows an illustrative schematic of a graphene or graphene-based film in contact with only a supporting layer, following removal of a growth substrate to liberate the graphene or graphene-based film;



FIG. 3 shows a schematic of an illustrative process whereby a graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material can be formed on a growth substrate and undergo subsequent removal therefrom in supported form;



FIGS. 4 and 5 show illustrative processes whereby a graphene or graphene-based film and a porous or permeable supporting layer can be freed from a growth substrate by an etching solution and then undergo contiguous transfer to a secondary substrate; and



FIG. 6 shows an illustrative SEM image of a graphene or graphene-based film having a plurality of electrospun PVDF fibers deposited thereon.



FIG. 7 shows an illustrative schematic of damage caused by debris disposed between graphene or a graphene-based material and a secondary substrate when (a) graphene or a graphene-based material is applied to an existing secondary substrate and (b) a secondary substrate is applied to graphene or a graphene-based material.



FIG. 8 shows an illustrative SEM image of damage to a graphene or graphene-based film caused by debris disposed between the film and an existing secondary substrate, as shown in FIG. 7(a).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure is directed, in part, to methods of forming composite structures comprising a non-sacrificial supporting layer and a graphene, graphene-based or other two-dimensional material. Graphene-based materials include, but are not limited to, single layer graphene, multilayer graphene or interconnected single or multilayer graphene domains and combinations thereof. In embodiments, multilayer graphene includes 2 to 20 layers, 2 to 10 layers or 2 to 5 layers. In embodiments, graphene is the dominant material in a graphene-based material. For example, a graphene-based material comprises at least 30% graphene, or at least 40% graphene, or at least 50% graphene, or at least 60% graphene, or at least 70% graphene, or at least 80% graphene, or at least 90% graphene, or at least 95% graphene. In embodiments, a graphene-based material comprises a range of graphene selected from 30% to 95%, or from 40% to 80% or from 50% to 70%.


As used herein, a “domain” refers to a region of a material where atoms are uniformly ordered into a crystal lattice. A domain is uniform within its boundaries, but different from a neighboring region. For example, a single crystalline material has a single domain of ordered atoms. In an embodiment, at least some of the graphene domains are nanocrystals, having domain sizes from 1 to 100 nm or 10-100 nm. In an embodiment, at least some of the graphene domains have a domain size greater than 100 nm up to 100 microns, or from 200 nm to 10 microns, or from 500 nm to 1 micron. “Grain boundaries” formed by crystallographic defects at edges of each domain differentiate between neighboring crystal lattices. In some embodiments, a first crystal lattice may be rotated relative to a neighboring second crystal lattice, by rotation about an axis perpendicular to the plane of a sheet, such that the two lattices differ in “crystal lattice orientation”.


In an embodiment, the sheet of graphene-based material comprises a sheet of single or multilayer graphene or a combination thereof. In an embodiment, the sheet of graphene-based material is a sheet of single or multilayer graphene or a combination thereof. In another embodiment, the sheet of graphene-based material is a sheet comprising a plurality of interconnected single or multilayer graphene domains. In an embodiment, the interconnected domains are covalently bonded together to form the sheet. When the domains in a sheet differ in crystal lattice orientation, the sheet is polycrystalline.


In embodiments, the thickness of the sheet of graphene-based material is from 0.34 to 10 nm, from 0.34 to 5 nm, or from 0.34 to 3 nm. A sheet of graphene-based material may comprise intrinsic defects. Intrinsic defects are those resulting unintentionally from preparation of the graphene-based material in contrast to perforations which are selectively introduced into a sheet of graphene-based material or a sheet of graphene. Such intrinsic defects include, but are not limited to, lattice anomalies, pores, tears, cracks or wrinkles. Lattice anomalies can include, but are not limited to, carbon rings with other than 6 members (e.g. 5, 7 or 9 membered rings), vacancies, interstitial defects (including incorporation of non-carbon atoms in the lattice), and grain boundaries.


In an embodiment, the layer comprising the sheet of graphene-based material further comprises non-graphenic carbon-based material located on the a surface of the sheet of graphene-based material. In an embodiment, the non-graphenic carbon-based material does not possess long-range order and may be classified as amorphous. In embodiments, the non-graphenic carbon-based material further comprises elements other than carbon and/or hydrocarbons. Non-carbon materials which may be incorporated in the non-graphenic carbon-based material include, but are not limited to, hydrogen, hydrocarbons, oxygen, silicon, copper and iron. In embodiments, carbon is the dominant material in non-graphenic carbon-based material. For example, a non-graphenic carbon-based material comprises at least 30% carbon, or at least 40% carbon, or at least 50% carbon, or at least 60% carbon, or at least 70% carbon, or at least 80% carbon, or at least 90% carbon, or at least 95% carbon. In embodiments, a non-graphenic carbon-based material comprises a range of carbon selected from 30% to 95%, or from 40% to 80%, or from 50% to 70%.


The present disclosure is directed, in part, to processes for removing graphene, graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials from their growth substrates. The present disclosure is also directed, in part, to processes for manipulating graphene, graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials that are free of a growth substrate. The present disclosure is also directed, in part, to composite structures and filtration membranes formed from perforated graphene or graphene-based material that has been released from its growth substrate.


As discussed above, transferring graphene graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials from a growth substrate to a secondary substrate can be exceedingly complicated. For example, mechanical damage and morphological changes can occur during the transfer process. Surface conformality of the transferred two-dimensional material on the secondary substrate can also be problematic. In this regard, if the secondary substrate is not sufficiently smooth, the transferred two-dimensional material can tear during deposition. The need for sufficient surface smoothness can severely limit candidate material choices for secondary substrates. Although some of the foregoing issues can be mitigated to a degree by using a sacrificial supporting layer (e.g., PMMA) to promote thin film transfer, sacrificial supporting layers can introduce their own set of problems, as discussed above. In addition, PMMA is not particularly flexible, which can be problematic for facilitating downstream applications.


Many applications for graphene, graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials have been envisioned based upon the intentional introduction of a plurality of pores of defined size within the planar structure of these entities. As used herein, the term “pore” will refer to an aperture or hole extending through the thickness of graphene, graphene-based material or a similar two-dimensional material. Graphene, graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials having intentionally introduced pores within their planar structure will be referred to herein as being “perforated,” and the action of introducing pores will be referred to as “perforating.” In a graphene or graphene-based sheet an interstitial aperture is formed by each six carbon atom ring structure in the sheet and this interstitial aperture is less than one nanometer across. In particular, this interstitial aperture, defined by the center-to-center distance between carbon atoms, is believed to be about 0.3 nanometers across its longest dimension. Perforation of sheets comprising two-dimensional network structures typically refers to formation of holes larger than the interstitial apertures in the network structure. Filtration represents an illustrative application that has been envisioned for perforated graphene, graphene-based material and other perforated two-dimensional materials, since substances of atomic or molecular dimensions can be effectively filtered by utilizing pores having a small enough size. Since graphene, graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials are so thin, high flux rates can desirably be achieved even with very small pore sizes. This is not the case with filtration membranes having a thicker active filtration layer.


Sacrificial supporting layers can be particularly problematic for use in conjunction with perforated graphene, graphene-based material and other perforated two-dimensional materials, since their difficult removal can affect porosity of the planar structure. Chemical damage and effective sourcing of porous or permeable secondary substrates can also present issues when utilizing a transferred two-dimensional material as an active filtration layer. Moreover, sacrificial supporting layers that have been previously used in the art are believed to lack sufficient porosity to allow their direct use in applications making use of porosity within graphene, graphene-based material or a similar two-dimensional material.


The present inventors recognized that instead of using a sacrificial (temporary) supporting layer to promote transfer of graphene, graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials to a secondary substrate, a non-sacrificial supporting layer can be effectively utilized to facilitate manipulation of these thin film materials in the form of a robust composite structure. As used herein, the term “non-sacrificial” refers to a supporting layer that remains associated with graphene, graphene-based material or another two-dimensional material in the two-dimensional material's terminal deployment. The properties of the non-sacrificial supporting layer can be chosen or tailored for compatibility with the particular terminal deployment. Elimination of a sacrificial supporting layer provides fewer opportunities for damaging the two-dimensional material during processing and benefits in the form of time and material savings. In addition, various non-sacrificial supporting layers can be readily deposited or formed with porosity established therein, which can be particularly useful in combination with perforated two-dimensional materials for filtration and other applications.


A number of different types of supporting layers, both polymeric and non-polymeric, can be utilized in conjunction with the embodiments of the present disclosure. The particular material utilized in the supporting layer can be chosen based upon the chemical or physical environment into which the graphene, graphene-based material or other two-dimensional material is being terminally deployed. Moreover, a number of processes can be used to deposit the supporting layer, thereby allowing considerable flexibility to be realized in its composition and morphology. Further advantages of such approaches are discussed hereinbelow.


In some embodiments, a non-sacrificial supporting layer of the present disclosure can be used to promote transfer of graphene, graphene-based material or another two-dimensional material to a secondary substrate. When used in this manner, the two-dimensional material can be sandwiched between the supporting layer and the secondary substrate, or the supporting layer can be sandwiched between the two-dimensional material and the secondary substrate. In either case, the non-sacrificial supporting layer does not significantly compromise the ability of the two-dimensional material to perform its intended function. For example, in filtration applications, a porous, non-sacrificial supporting layer can allow a perforated two-dimensional material to function as an active filtration layer by allowing free liquid or gas passage to take place upstream and/or downstream of the two-dimensional material. In configurations where the two-dimensional material is sandwiched between the secondary substrate and the supporting layer, the pores within the supporting layer can be effective to pre-filter large particles before they have an opportunity to plug the smaller pores within the two-dimensional material.


In some embodiments, a number of non-sacrificial supporting layers can be directly deposited in a porous or permeable condition, or porosity can be created within the supporting layer after its deposition on the two-dimensional material. In either case, the porosity within the supporting layer can be of a sufficient magnitude to allow access to the pores within a perforated two-dimensional material on which the supporting layer is deposited. For example, a porous or permeable, non-sacrificial supporting layer deposited on a perforated two-dimensional material can constitute at least a portion of a filtration membrane in various embodiments of the present disclosure. Such filtration membranes can display more consistent filtration properties than similar membranes prepared by transferring the two-dimensional material to a secondary substrate through use of a sacrificial supporting layer.


Accordingly, the processes described herein allow graphene, graphene-based material and other two-dimensional materials to be used in conjunction with a much broader array of materials than would otherwise be possible. Further, by depositing a polymer or other supporting layer substance directly on a two-dimensional material, better surface coverage and morphological properties can be attained than by performing the reverse and conventional process of depositing a previously synthesized two-dimensional material onto an existing substrate. The processes of the present disclosure allow for improved physical and chemical interactions to take place between the two-dimensional material and the supporting layer. In addition, a direct deposit approach may decrease or prevent delamination of the two-dimensional material and supporting layer by improving adhesion between the layers. As an additional advantage, direct deposition approaches of the present disclosure can decrease the likelihood of trapping debris between the two-dimensional material and the supporting layer, or mitigate damage caused by trapped debris.



FIG. 7 shows an illustrative schematic of damage caused by debris disposed between graphene or a graphene-based material and a secondary substrate when (a) graphene or a graphene-based material is applied to an existing secondary substrate and (b) a secondary substrate is applied to graphene or a graphene-based material. When graphene or a graphene-based material is applied to an existing substrate pressure is typically applied to encourage contact of the film and substrate. Such pressure may allow debris to break through the film, thereby creating damage of the type shown in FIG. 8, which shows an illustrative SEM image of damage to a graphene or graphene-based film caused by debris disposed between the film and an existing secondary substrate. In contrast, methods disclosed herein apply a secondary substrate to an existing graphene or graphene-based material. The secondary substrate is typically applied via a solution technique, a vapor deposition technique, an electrospinning technique or another technique that allows the secondary substrate to at least partially encapsulate any debris particles present on the graphene or graphene-based material.


Although the processes described herein can be particularly advantageous for use in conjunction with perforated two-dimensional materials, it is to be recognized that some or all of these advantages can also be recognized whether the two-dimensional material is perforated or not. For example, enhanced surface coverage and conformality on the supporting layers of the present disclosure can still be realized even if the two-dimensional material is not perforated. Moreover, the features and advantages of the present disclosure can be realized with non-sacrificial supporting layers that are either porous, permeable or substantially non-porous or permeable. Furthermore, although certain embodiments are described herein with graphene or graphene-based material as the two-dimensional material, it is to be recognized that other two-dimensional materials can be used similarly in alternative embodiments of the present disclosure unless otherwise specified herein. Thus, considerable flexibility can be realized by practicing the disclosure herein.


In various embodiments, processes for removing a two-dimensional material, such as graphene or graphene-based material, from its growth substrate can include: providing a two-dimensional material adhered to a growth substrate, depositing a supporting layer on the two-dimensional material while the two-dimensional material is adhered to the growth substrate, and releasing the two-dimensional material from the growth substrate. The two-dimensional material remains in contact with the supporting layer following release of the two-dimensional material from the growth substrate. The combination of the two-dimensional material in contact with the supporting layer defines a composite structure.


The two-dimensional material can be any substance having an extended planar molecular structure and an atomic level thickness. Particular examples of two-dimensional materials include graphene films, graphene-based material, transition metal dichalcogenides, α-boron nitride, silicene or germanene or other materials having a like planar structure. Specific examples of transition metal dichalcogenides include molybdenum disulfide and niobium diselenide. Graphene or graphene-based films according to the embodiments of the present disclosure can include single-layer or multi-layer films, or any combination thereof. Choice of a suitable two-dimensional material can be determined by a number of factors, including the chemical and physical environment into which the graphene, graphene-based material or other two-dimensional material is to be terminally deployed, ease of perforating the two-dimensional material, and the like.



FIG. 1 shows an illustrative schematic of a graphene or graphene-based film sandwiched between a growth substrate and a supporting layer. As depicted in FIG. 1, graphene or graphene-based film 4 is present on its original growth substrate 2. Graphene or graphene-based film 4 can be perforated or unperforated depending on the intended terminal deployment for the graphene or graphene-based film. Upon graphene or graphene-based film 4 is deposited supporting layer 6, such that graphene or graphene-based film 4 is sandwiched between growth substrate 2 and supporting layer 6. Supporting layer 6 can be porous, permeable or substantially non-porous or permeable, depending on its intended function, as well as the intended function of the graphene or graphene-based film.



FIG. 2 shows an illustrative schematic of graphene or graphene-based film 4 in contact with only supporting layer 6, following removal of growth substrate 2 to liberate graphene or graphene-based film 4. A high degree of surface conformality is established between graphene or graphene-based film 4 and supporting layer 6, thereby maintaining mechanical support of graphene or graphene-based film 4. Although FIG. 2 has depicted complete removal of growth substrate 2, it is to be recognized that complete removal of growth substrate 2 need not necessarily take place. Instead, only a sufficient amount of removal of growth substrate 2 needs to take place to affect release of graphene film 4 and supporting layer 6 to produce the configuration depicted in FIG. 2. Removal of growth substrate 2 can involve etching the growth substrate with an etching solution. In alternative configurations, graphene or graphene-based film 4 and supporting layer 6 can be delaminated from growth substrate 2 in order to leave growth substrate 2 intact.



FIG. 3 shows a schematic of an illustrative process whereby a graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material can be formed on a growth substrate and undergo subsequent removal therefrom in supported form. As depicted in FIG. 3, graphene or graphene-based film 4 is deposited on growth substrate 2 during operation 10. Thereafter, in operation 20, supporting layer 6 is deposited on graphene or graphene-based film 4 while graphene or graphene-based film 4 is still present on growth substrate 2. Suitable techniques for forming, casting or depositing supporting layer 6 onto graphene or graphene-based film 4 are discussed in greater detail hereinbelow. Additional operations for introducing pores into graphene or graphene-based film 4 or supporting layer 6 are also discussed in further detail hereinbelow. Finally, in operation 30, growth substrate 2 is removed or released, leaving behind graphene or graphene-based film 4 supported by supporting layer 6, thereby defining composite structure 32.


In more particular embodiments, the growth substrate can include a metal. Various metals, particularly transition metals, can be effective for promoting growth of a two-dimensional material thereon. For example, in the case of graphene or graphene-based films, a copper substrate or a nickel substrate can be particularly effective as a growth substrate. In some embodiments, the growth substrate can be formed substantially entirely of a metal, such as a metal foil. In other embodiments, the growth substrate can include a metal surface. For example, a ceramic substrate having a metal surface coating can be used as the growth substrate in various embodiments of the present disclosure.


In various embodiments, releasing the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material from the growth substrate can involve etching the growth substrate. In various embodiments, the operation of etching the growth substrate to affect release of the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material can involve a dissolution process. Accordingly, the etching operation can include exposing at least the growth substrate to an etching solution. A particularly suitable etching solution for metal growth substrates, particularly copper and other transition metals, can include ammonium persulfate as the active etching component. That is, in some embodiments, etching the growth substrate can involve at least partially dissolving a metal with an ammonium persulfate etch solution. Other oxidizing etchants can also be suitable for at least partially dissolving a metal substrate according to the embodiments of the present disclosure. Illustrative examples of other suitable etchants can include etching solutions containing, for example, ferric salts (e.g., ferric chloride), cupric salts, potassium peroxymonosulfate, hydrogen peroxide-ammonia, peroxide, hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, hydrofluoric acid, nitric acid and combinations thereof. In addition, electrochemical etching may be used to release graphene, graphene-based materials or other two-dimensional materials from a metallic growth substrate.


In alternative embodiments, releasing the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material from the growth substrate can involve delaminating the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material from the growth substrate. Illustrative delamination processes can involve, for example, electrolytic generation of hydrogen gas between the graphene or graphene-based film and the growth substrate to promote delamination.


In some embodiments, a supporting layer and a graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material can be used without another secondary substrate being present. In other instances, however, it can still be desirable to transfer the supporting layer and the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material to a secondary substrate. In some embodiments, both the removal and transfer processes can be promoted by an etching solution and optionally another liquid. FIG. 4 shows an illustrative process whereby a graphene or graphene-based film and porous or permeable supporting layer can be freed from a growth substrate by an etching solution and then undergo transfer to a secondary substrate. As depicted in FIG. 4, etching solution 50 is provided in etching tank 52. Growth substrate 2 is placed in contact with etching solution 50. Adhered graphene or graphene-based film 4 and supporting layer 6 can also contact etching solution 50 in some embodiments. In some embodiments, growth substrate 2 and its adhered layer(s) can float on the surface of etching solution 50 by native buoyancy alone. In other embodiments, a high buoyancy material, such as a foam, can be utilized in order to promote floatation of growth substrate 2 and its adhered layer(s) on etching solution 50. The high buoyancy material can also surround growth substrate 2 so as to limit the lateral movement of graphene or graphene-based film 4 once it has been removed from growth substrate 2. As etching solution 50 affects dissolution of growth substrate 2 during operation 60, graphene or graphene-based film 4 and supporting layer 6 remain floating on etching solution 50. Thereafter, the level of etching solution 50 in etching tank 52 can be lowered to settle graphene or graphene-based film 4 and supporting layer 6 onto secondary substrate 8, as shown in operation 70. Optionally, graphene or graphene-based film 4 and supporting layer 6 can be floated to a different liquid phase lacking the active etchant (e.g., water or a water-alcohol mixture), and they can be lowered onto secondary substrate 8 in a substantially equivalent manner. Once deposited on secondary substrate 8, graphene or graphene-based film 4 can be removed utilized in various applications. Similar processes can be used to manipulate graphene or graphene-based film 4 and supporting layer 6 produced by mechanical delamination.


In FIG. 4, graphene or graphene-based film 4 is sandwiched between secondary substrate 8 and supporting layer 6. FIG. 5 shows a schematic of an alternative configuration in which supporting layer 6 directly contacts secondary substrate 8, with graphene or graphene-based film 4 being directed outwardly. The operations used to produce the configuration of FIG. 5 are substantially similar to those described above for FIG. 4, but they are performed on an inverted or flipped stack, i.e., where supporting layer 6 is below the two-dimensional material when viewed in cross-section. The stack may be inverted or flipped prior to release of the growth substrate or after release of the growth substrate. When the stack is inverted or flipped after release of the growth substrate, the two-dimensional material remains sufficiently supported by supporting layer 6 during the inverting or flipping operation to prevent tearing, folding or other damage to the two-dimensional material.


Accordingly, in some embodiments, processes of the present disclosure can include transferring the graphene, graphene-based material or other two-dimensional material to a secondary substrate. When used, the secondary substrate can also be porous or permeable. For example, when constructing a filtration membrane containing a perforated graphene or graphene-based film and a porous or permeable supporting layer, the secondary substrate can also be porous or permeable in order to allow fluid flow to freely take place within the stacked structure.


It is believed that any material can be used to form the secondary substrate or the supporting layer, provided that the chosen material suitably adheres to the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material. Adhesion between the graphene or graphene-based film and/or layers of the stacked structure may be facilitated by a high degree of conformality between the layers, where the conformal contact between the layers may improve van der Waals forces, dielectric forces, covalent bonding and/or ionic bonding. The ability to generate suitable porosity in the secondary substrate and/or the supporting layer can also dictate the suitability of a particular material. Illustrative materials can include, for example, various polymers, ceramics, carbon grids, and the like.


As indicated above, the secondary substrate can desirably be omitted in various embodiments of the present disclosure. That is, a graphene or graphene-based film and its adhered supporting layer can be terminally deployed in various applications. Accordingly, when a graphene or graphene-based film and its adhered supporting layer are to be used without a secondary substrate being present, transferring operations can be omitted (e.g., operation 60 in FIGS. 4 and 5).


In various embodiments, the supporting layer of the present disclosure can have a plurality of pores therein. In some embodiments, the plurality of pores in the supporting layer can be natively introduced as the supporting layer is deposited on the graphene, graphene-based material or other two-dimensional material. In other embodiments, the plurality of pores in the supporting layer can be introduced separately after the supporting layer is deposited. In either case, processes of the present disclosure can include introducing a plurality of pores into the supporting layer. Suitable techniques for depositing or forming a porous or permeable supporting layer are discussed in greater detail hereinbelow.


In some embodiments, the supporting layer can have a “pore size gradient” throughout its thickness. “Pore size gradient”, as used herein, describes a plurality of pores in a supporting layer having a diameter of each pore that increases or decreases along an imaginary line through the center of the pore. For example, a supporting layer may have a pore size gradient that decreases or narrows nearer the surface of a two-dimensional material or along a direction of fluid or gas flow. In such an embodiment, a pore size of the supporting layer is smaller nearer the surface of a two-dimensional material than at an opposite side of the supporting layer.


In some embodiments, the supporting layer can have a “porosity gradient” throughout its thickness. “Porosity gradient”, as used herein, describes a change, along a dimension of the supporting layer, in the “porosity” or ratio of the volume of all pores in a layer to the volume of the whole layer. For example, throughout the thickness of the porous supporting layer, the porosity can change in a regular or irregular manner. Generally, a porosity gradient decreases from one face of the supporting layer to the other. For example, the lowest porosity in the supporting layer can be located spatially closest to the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material, and the highest porosity can be located farther away. A porosity gradient of this type may be achieved by electrospinning fibers onto a two-dimensional material such that a fiber mat is denser near the surface of the two-dimensional material and less dense further from the surface of the two-dimensional material.


In some embodiments, the supporting layer can have a “permeability gradient” throughout its thickness. “Permeability gradient”, as used herein, describes a change, along a dimension of the supporting layer, in the “permeability” or rate of flow of a liquid or gas through a porous material. For example, throughout the thickness of the supporting layer, the permeability can change in a regular or irregular manner. Generally, a permeability gradient decreases from one face of the supporting layer to the other. For example, the lowest permeability in the supporting layer can be located spatially closest to the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material, and the highest permeability can be located farther away. Those of skill in the art will understand that permeability of a layer may increase or decrease without pore diameter or porosity changing, e.g., in response to chemical functionalization, applied pressure or other factors.


In various embodiments, the thickness and structure of the supporting layer can be chosen to convey a desired degree of structural support (e.g., to prevent tearing and/or buckling) to the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material following its removal from a growth substrate. In various embodiments, the supporting layer can have a thickness of about 1 mm or less. In more particular embodiments, a thickness of the supporting layer can range between about 500 nm and about 100 μm, or between about 1 μm and about 50 μm, or between about 1 μm and about 10 μm.


In some embodiments, both the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material and the supporting layer can include a plurality of pores therein. When both the two-dimensional material and the supporting layer contain pores, the pores in the two-dimensional material are generally smaller than the pores in the supporting layer. For example, in some embodiments, the supporting layer can contain pores that are about 1 μm in size or larger and the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material can contain pores that are about 10 nm in size or smaller. Accordingly, in various embodiments, the sizes or diameters of pores in the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material are at least about 10-fold smaller than are the sizes or diameters of pores in the supporting layer, and in other embodiments, the sizes or diameters of pores in the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material are at least about 100-fold smaller than are the sizes or diameters of pores in the supporting layer.


The technique used for introducing a plurality of pores into the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material is not considered to be particularly limited and can include various chemical and physical perforation techniques. Suitable perforation techniques can include, for example, particle bombardment, chemical oxidation, lithographic patterning, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, perforation of the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material to produce pores therein can occur in conjunction with establishing pores in the supporting layer. In some or other embodiments, a perforation process can be applied to the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material before depositing a supporting layer thereon. In some embodiments, pores can be introduced in the graphene, graphene-based material or other two-dimensional material while it is adhered to its growth substrate. In still other embodiments, the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material can be perforated after releasing the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material from its growth substrate, such as through etching the growth substrate.


In various embodiments, the supporting layer can be formed from a porous or permeable polymer or a porous or permeable ceramic material. Suitable techniques for depositing supporting layers formed from these materials are discussed below.


Porous or permeable polymers can be deposited or formed by various processes used to create membranes for gas separation or microfiltration applications. Suitable techniques for depositing or forming a porous or permeable polymer on the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material can include casting or depositing a polymer solution onto the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material using a method such as spin-coating, curtain coating, doctor-blading, immersion coating, electro spinning, or other like techniques. Suitable polymers for forming a porous or permeable supporting layer on the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material are not believed to be particularly limited and can include, for example, polysulfones, polyethersulfones (PES), polyvinylidine fluoride (PVDF), polypropylene, cellulose acetate, polyethylene, polycarbonate, fluorocarbon polymers such as polytetrafluoroethylene, and mixtures and block co-polymers thereof. Further disclosure regarding these techniques and others follows hereinafter.


In some embodiments, the process for forming a supporting layer on the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material can include an electrospinning process, in which a plurality of polymer filaments are randomly laid down to form a porous mat on the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material. The mat can have pores defined therein as the filaments of the supporting layer are deposited. FIG. 6 shows an illustrative SEM image of a graphene or graphene-based film deposited upon a plurality of electrospun PVDF fibers. The electrospinning process can constitute a wet electrospinning process in some embodiments or a dry electrospinning process in other embodiments. In dry electrospinning processes, the spun fibers of the supporting layer can remain as essentially discrete entities once deposited. In contrast, wet electro spinning processes can deposit the spun fibers such that they are at least partially fused together when deposited. Accordingly, considerable flexibility can be realized in the size and morphology of the fiber mat deposited by an electrospinning process. These factors can impact the degree of porosity and the effective pore size of the supporting layer. The thickness of the supporting layer can also impact the effective porosity. In some embodiments, electrospinning processes can be adapted to produce gradient porosity in the supporting layer, as discussed above. The porosity of the supporting layer can include effective porosity values up to about 95% with a broad range of pore sizes. In some embodiments, a single spinneret can be moved to lay down a mat of the supporting layer. In other embodiments, multiple spinnerets can be used for this purpose. In some embodiments, the spun fibers in an electro spun supporting layer can have a fiber diameter ranging between about 10 nm and about 1 μm, or between about 10 nm and about 500 nm, or between about 20 nm and about 100 nm. Although the effective pore size can be large and variable in electro spun fiber supporting layers, the fibers can still readily provide mechanical stabilization to the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material following release from its growth substrate.


In some embodiments, the supporting layer can be deposited by a solution-coating process onto the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material, particularly for a polymer film supporting layer. Illustrative solution-coating processes can include dip coating processes, spin coating processes, spray coating processes, the like, and any combination thereof. A sacrificial material can be included in the coating solution or can be co-deposited with the coating solution so that the sacrificial material is present in the as-deposited polymer film. The sacrificial material can constitute a degradable material, removable material or a dissolvable material that is degraded, removed or dissolved after depositing the supporting layer in order to introduce a plurality of pores therein. As used herein, the term “degradable” refers to both chemical and physical degradation processes, such as chemical breakdown, melting and the like. The size of the sacrificial material can be chosen to produce pores having a desired size within the supporting layer upon removal of the sacrificial material. In general, any sacrificial material can be used provided that its degradation, removal or dissolution does not also remove or substantially damage the material of the supporting layer. Illustrative sacrificial materials can include, for example, soluble salts, soluble organic compounds, degradable polymer particulates, waxes, low melting alloys, and the like. In some embodiments of this approach, the pores within the supporting layer can be opened while the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material is adhered to its growth substrate. In other embodiments, the pores can be opened after or concurrently with release of the graphene, graphene-based material or other two-dimensional material from its growth substrate. Accordingly, in various embodiments, solvent exchange or thermal annealing processes can be used to open the pores in the supporting layer. Dissolution-based processes for defining pores in the supporting layer are believed to be more easily conducted than are complete removal of a sacrificial supporting layer, because an easily dissolvable, removable or degradable material can be included within a more robust supporting layer material.


In alternative embodiments, a sacrificial material can be deposited on the surface of the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material before solution-phase deposition of the supporting layer. So long as the thickness of the deposited layer is such that the sacrificial material remains accessible, a plurality of pores can be defined in the supporting layer. For example, the thickness of the supporting layer can be adjusted to be smaller than an effective diameter of the sacrificial material such that pores are defined in the supporting layer upon removal of the sacrificial material.


In still other alternative embodiments for forming a supporting layer, non-degradable particulates can be co-deposited with a polymer in order to increase the fractional free volume between polymer chains. By increasing the fractional free volume, the effective permeability of the supporting layer can be increased by establishing a solution-diffusion layer but without defining discrete pores. An illustrative example of such supporting layers include those formed from NAFION (a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene copolymer, which is selectively permeable toward movement of cations). Such supporting layers can still be desirable for use in conjunction with a perforated graphene or graphene-based film or other perforated two-dimensional material according to the various embodiments of the present disclosure.


Still other processes can be used for depositing the supporting layer in porous or permeable form upon the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material. Particularly for non-polymeric supporting layers. In some embodiments, atomic layer deposition (ALD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD) or other known deposition techniques can be used to deposit a porous or permeable supporting layer formed from a ceramic material. For example, an alumina porous or permeable supporting layer can be formed by ALD. A porous or permeable supporting layer deposited by ALD can have up to about 200 individual layers and can range from about 10 nm to about 20 nm in thickness. In some embodiments, a sacrificial material, such as those discussed above, can be used to introduce a plurality of pores into a supporting layer deposited by ALD.


In still other embodiments, various lithographic techniques can be used to pattern a plurality of pores in an existing supporting layer that is originally substantially non-porous. Patterning can be ordered or random in nature. Suitable lithographic techniques will be familiar to one having ordinary skill in the art. When conducted following removal of the two-dimensional material from the growth substrate, lithographic generation of pores in the supporting layer can be conducted from the top-side or bottom-side of the graphene or graphene-based film (e.g., see FIG. 2). Top-side generation of pores in the supporting layer can also introduce a plurality of pores of like size in the two-dimensional material if the penetration depth is sufficiently great, or pores can be generated in the supporting layer only if the penetration depth is not sufficient to break through the two-dimensional material. Bottom-side generation of pores in the supporting layer, in contrast, can result in pore generation in both the two-dimensional material and the supporting layer, since the lithographic beam necessarily traverses the two-dimensional material in the course of penetrating the supporting layer.


In still other embodiments, the supporting layer can include a perforated graphene, graphene-based material or other perforated two-dimensional material having pores that are larger than those in the perforated graphene, graphene-based material or other perforated two-dimensional material onto which the supporting layer is deposited. In a specific example, a lithographic mask can be applied to graphene or graphene-based material on its growth substrate, and a plurality of large perforations (e.g., about 100 nm in size or larger) can be densely defined in the graphene or graphene-based material. Thereafter, the lithographic mask can be left on the graphene or graphene-based material and the growth substrate can be removed, thereby providing perforated graphene or graphene-based material supported by the lithographic mask. The perforated graphene or graphene-based material supported by the lithographic mask can then be contacted graphene surface-to-graphene surface in order to define a hybrid supporting layer for the graphene or graphene-based material containing smaller pores. Through van der Waals forces, good adhesion can occur between the two graphene or graphene-based material surfaces. Upon removal of the growth substrate from the perforated graphene or graphene-based material containing smaller pores, the lithographic mask can provide mechanical support to the composite structure as described herein.


In some embodiments, the supporting layer, the secondary substrate (if present), or both can be functionalized. Specifically, the supporting layer and/or the secondary substrate can bear functionality that increases the compatibility and degree of adhesion to the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material. In some embodiments, the supporting layer and/or the secondary substrate can bear functional groups that promote covalent bond formation to functional groups in the graphene or graphene-based film or other two-dimensional material. Residual functional groups present in graphene or graphene-based material can include, for example, carboxylic acids, alcohols, epoxides, carbonyls, and the like. Accordingly, covalent bond formation to the graphene or graphene-based material can involve the formation of moieties such as, for example, esters, ethers, aldehydes, alcohols, amides, carbonyl addition compounds, epoxide addition compounds, and the like.


Accordingly, in some embodiments, processes described herein can include providing a graphene or graphene-based film adhered to a growth substrate, perforating the film to introduce a plurality of pores therein, depositing a supporting layer on the film while the film is adhered to the growth substrate, and releasing the film from the growth substrate. The graphene or graphene-based film remains in contact with the supporting layer following release of the film from the growth substrate. The growth substrate may comprise a metal. The supporting layer also may comprise a plurality of pores.


In some embodiments, the processes described herein can include performing a filtration operation with a composite structure containing a graphene or graphene-based film and the supporting layer. The filtration operation can include ultrafiltration, microfiltration, nanofiltration, molecular filtration, reverse osmosis or any combination thereof. The material being filtered by the perforated graphene or graphene-based material can constitute any material that allows the desired filtrate to pass through the pores within the perforated graphene or graphene-based material while retaining the bulk material on an opposite side of the graphene or graphene-based material. Materials that can be filtered using graphene or graphene-based materials comprising nanometer or subnanometer-sized pores include, for example, ions, small molecules, viruses, proteins, and the like. In some embodiments, the supported graphene or graphene-based material described herein can be used in water desalination, gap-phase separation or water purification applications.


Accordingly, in various embodiments, the combination of a perforated graphene or graphene-based material and a supporting layer, optionally in combination with a porous or permeable secondary substrate, can constitute at least a portion of a filtration membrane. Illustrative configurations for a filtration membrane containing perforated graphene or graphene-based material and a supporting layer containing pores are depicted in the FIGURES herein.


Although the invention has been described with reference to the disclosed embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that these are only illustrative of the invention. It should be understood that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. The invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description.


Every formulation or combination of components described or exemplified can be used to practice the invention, unless otherwise stated. Specific names of compounds are intended to be exemplary, as it is known that one of ordinary skill in the art can name the same compounds differently. When a compound is described herein such that a particular isomer or enantiomer of the compound is not specified, for example, in a formula or in a chemical name, that description is intended to include each isomer and enantiomer of the compound described individually or in any combination. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that methods, device elements, starting materials and synthetic methods other than those specifically exemplified can be employed in the practice of the invention without resort to undue experimentation. All art-known functional equivalents, of any such methods, device elements, starting materials and synthetic methods are intended to be included in this invention.


Whenever a range is given in the specification, for example, a temperature range, a time range, or a composition range, all intermediate ranges and subranges, as well as all individual values included in the ranges given are intended to be included in the disclosure. When a Markush group or other grouping is used herein, all individual members of the group and all combinations and subcombinations possible of the group are intended to be individually included in the disclosure.


As used herein, “comprising” is synonymous with “including,” “containing,” or “characterized by,” and is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. As used herein, “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claim element. As used herein, “consisting essentially of” does not exclude materials or steps that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the claim. Any recitation herein of the term “comprising”, particularly in a description of components of a composition or in a description of elements of a device, is understood to encompass those compositions and methods consisting essentially of and consisting of the recited components or elements. The invention illustratively described herein suitably may be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, limitation or limitations which is not specifically disclosed herein.


The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by preferred embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.


In general the terms and phrases used herein have their art-recognized meaning, which can be found by reference to standard texts, journal references and contexts known to those skilled in the art. The preceding definitions are provided to clarify their specific use in the context of the invention.


All references throughout this application, for example patent documents including issued or granted patents or equivalents; patent application publications; and non-patent literature documents or other source material; are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties, as though individually incorporated by reference, to the extent each reference is at least partially not inconsistent with the disclosure in this application (for example, a reference that is partially inconsistent is incorporated by reference except for the partially inconsistent portion of the reference).


All patents and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of skill of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. References cited herein are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety to indicate the state of the art, in some cases as of their filing date, and it is intended that this information can be employed herein, if needed, to exclude (for example, to disclaim) specific embodiments that are in the prior art. For example, when a compound is claimed, it should be understood that compounds known in the prior art, including certain compounds disclosed in the references disclosed herein (particularly in referenced patent documents), are not intended to be included in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A membrane comprising: a first layer comprising 1 to 5 layers of a porous graphene or a porous graphene-based material formed by chemical vapor deposition that has been subjected to nanoparticle bombardment;a supporting layer in contact with the first layer that comprises a plurality of filaments formed by a wet electrospinning process or a dry electrospinning process; anda secondary substrate comprising a porous polymer,wherein the first layer is positioned between the secondary substrate and the supporting layer or the supporting layer is positioned between the first layer and the secondary substrate.
  • 2. A membrane comprising: a first layer comprising 2 to 5 layers of a porous graphene or a porous graphene-based material;a porous or permeable supporting layer different from the first layer, anda third layer comprising a porous or permeable secondary substrate,wherein the first layer is positioned between the secondary substrate and the supporting layer or the supporting layer is positioned between the first layer and the secondary substrate andwherein the supporting layer comprises filaments or fibers having a diameter of less than 1 μm.
  • 3. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the graphene or the graphene-based material comprises 2 layers of graphene or graphene-based material.
  • 4. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the graphene or the graphene-based material is perforated via nanoparticle bombardment.
  • 5. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the graphene or the graphene-based material comprises at least 90% graphene.
  • 6. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the graphene or the graphene-based material is in contact with the supporting layer.
  • 7. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the graphene or the graphene-based material is formed by chemical vapor deposition.
  • 8. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the filaments are polymer filaments formed by a wet electrospinning process or a dry electrospinning process.
  • 9. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the first layer is positioned between the secondary substrate and the supporting layer.
  • 10. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the supporting layer is positioned between the first layer and the secondary substrate.
  • 11. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the supporting layer comprises pores.
  • 12. The membrane of claim 11, wherein porous supporting layer has a pore size gradient.
  • 13. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the graphene or the graphene-based material is perforated with pores and the supporting layer comprises pores, wherein the pores in the graphene or the graphene-based material are smaller than the pores in the supporting layer.
  • 14. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the supporting layer comprises a random mat of fibers, the fibers having a diameter between about 10 nm and about 500 nm.
  • 15. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the supporting layer the supporting has a thickness between about 500 nm and about 10 μm.
  • 16. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the supporting layer has a thickness of 1 mm or less.
  • 17. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the graphene or graphene-based film are at least 10-fold smaller than the plurality of pores in the supporting layer.
  • 18. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the filaments or fibers have a diameter of less than 100 nm.
  • 19. A membrane comprising: a first layer comprising 2 to 5 layers of a porous two-dimensional material;a supporting layer in contact with the first layer that comprises a plurality of filaments formed by a wet electrospinning process or a dry electrospinning process; anda secondary substrate comprising a porous polymer,wherein the first layer is positioned between the secondary substrate and the supporting layer or the supporting layer is positioned between the first layer and the secondary substrate.
  • 20. The membrane of claim 2, wherein the supporting layer comprises a random layer of filaments or fibers having a diameter of less than 500 nm.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 from U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/934,537, filed Jan. 31, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (675)
Number Name Date Kind
2187417 Doble Jan 1940 A
3024153 Kennedy Mar 1962 A
3303085 Price et al. Feb 1967 A
3501831 Gordon Mar 1970 A
3593854 Swank Jul 1971 A
3692059 Ice, Jr. Sep 1972 A
3701433 Krakauer et al. Oct 1972 A
3802972 Fleischer et al. Apr 1974 A
3896733 Rosenberg Jul 1975 A
4043331 Martin Aug 1977 A
4073732 Lauer et al. Feb 1978 A
4159954 Gangemi Jul 1979 A
4162220 Servas Jul 1979 A
4277344 Cadotte Jul 1981 A
4303530 Shah et al. Dec 1981 A
4457747 Tu Jul 1984 A
4743371 Servas et al. May 1988 A
4804363 Valeri Feb 1989 A
4855058 Holland et al. Aug 1989 A
4880440 Perrin Nov 1989 A
4889626 Browne Dec 1989 A
4891134 Vcelka Jan 1990 A
4925560 Sorrick May 1990 A
4935207 Stanbro et al. Jun 1990 A
4976858 Kadoya Dec 1990 A
5052444 Messerly et al. Oct 1991 A
5080770 Culkin Jan 1992 A
5082476 Kahlbaugh Jan 1992 A
5156628 Kranz Oct 1992 A
5182111 Aebischer et al. Jan 1993 A
5185086 Kaali et al. Feb 1993 A
5201767 Caldarise et al. Apr 1993 A
5244981 Seidner et al. Sep 1993 A
5277748 Sakaguchi et al. Jan 1994 A
5314492 Hamilton et al. May 1994 A
5314960 Spinelli et al. May 1994 A
5314961 Anton et al. May 1994 A
5331067 Seidner et al. Jul 1994 A
5344454 Clarke et al. Sep 1994 A
5371147 Spinelli et al. Dec 1994 A
5425858 Farmer Jun 1995 A
5480449 Hamilton et al. Jan 1996 A
5514181 Light et al. May 1996 A
5516522 Peyman et al. May 1996 A
5549697 Caldarise Aug 1996 A
5562944 Kafrawy Oct 1996 A
5565210 Rosenthal et al. Oct 1996 A
5580530 Kowatsch et al. Dec 1996 A
5595621 Light et al. Jan 1997 A
5636437 Kaschmitter et al. Jun 1997 A
5639275 Baetge et al. Jun 1997 A
5641323 Caldarise Jun 1997 A
5658334 Caldarise et al. Aug 1997 A
5662158 Caldarise Sep 1997 A
5665118 Lasalle et al. Sep 1997 A
5671897 Ogg et al. Sep 1997 A
5679232 Fedor et al. Oct 1997 A
5679249 Fendya et al. Oct 1997 A
5687788 Caldarise et al. Nov 1997 A
5700477 Rosenthal et al. Dec 1997 A
5713410 Lasalle et al. Feb 1998 A
5716412 Decarlo et al. Feb 1998 A
5716414 Caldarise Feb 1998 A
5725586 Sommerich Mar 1998 A
5725775 Bene et al. Mar 1998 A
5731360 Pekala et al. Mar 1998 A
5733503 Kowatsch et al. Mar 1998 A
5746272 Mastrorio et al. May 1998 A
5782286 Sommerich Jul 1998 A
5782289 Mastrorio et al. Jul 1998 A
5788916 Caldarise Aug 1998 A
5800828 Dionne et al. Sep 1998 A
5808312 Fukuda Sep 1998 A
5868727 Barr et al. Feb 1999 A
5897592 Caldarise et al. Apr 1999 A
5902762 Mercuri et al. May 1999 A
5906234 Mastrorio et al. May 1999 A
5910172 Penenberg Jun 1999 A
5910173 Decarlo et al. Jun 1999 A
5913998 Butler et al. Jun 1999 A
5922304 Unger Jul 1999 A
5925247 Huebbel Jul 1999 A
5932185 Pekala et al. Aug 1999 A
5935084 Southworth Aug 1999 A
5935172 Ochoa et al. Aug 1999 A
5954937 Farmer Sep 1999 A
5974973 Tittgemeyer Nov 1999 A
5976555 Liu et al. Nov 1999 A
5980718 Van Konynenburg et al. Nov 1999 A
6008431 Caldarise et al. Dec 1999 A
6013080 Khalili Jan 2000 A
6022509 Matthews et al. Feb 2000 A
6052608 Young et al. Apr 2000 A
6080393 Liu et al. Jun 2000 A
6093209 Sanders Jul 2000 A
6139585 Li Oct 2000 A
6152882 Prutchi Nov 2000 A
6156323 Verdicchio et al. Dec 2000 A
6193956 Liu et al. Feb 2001 B1
6209621 Treacy Apr 2001 B1
6213124 Butterworth Apr 2001 B1
6228123 Dezzani May 2001 B1
6264699 Noiles et al. Jul 2001 B1
6292704 Malonek et al. Sep 2001 B1
6309532 Tran et al. Oct 2001 B1
6346187 Tran et al. Feb 2002 B1
6375014 Garcera et al. Apr 2002 B1
6423022 Roeher et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426214 Butler et al. Jul 2002 B1
6454095 Brisebois et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455115 Demeyer Sep 2002 B1
6461622 Liu et al. Oct 2002 B2
6462935 Shiue et al. Oct 2002 B1
6521865 Jones et al. Feb 2003 B1
6532386 Sun et al. Mar 2003 B2
6544316 Baker et al. Apr 2003 B2
6580598 Shiue et al. Jun 2003 B2
6654229 Yanagisawa et al. Nov 2003 B2
6659298 Wong Dec 2003 B2
6660150 Conlan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6661643 Shiue et al. Dec 2003 B2
6686437 Buchman et al. Feb 2004 B2
6692627 Russell et al. Feb 2004 B1
6695880 Roffman et al. Feb 2004 B1
6699684 Ho et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719740 Burnett et al. Apr 2004 B2
6905612 Dorian et al. Jun 2005 B2
6924190 Dennison Aug 2005 B2
7014829 Yanagisawa et al. Mar 2006 B2
7071406 Smalley et al. Jul 2006 B2
7092753 Darvish et al. Aug 2006 B2
7138042 Tran et al. Nov 2006 B2
7171263 Darvish et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175783 Curran Feb 2007 B2
7179419 Lin et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190997 Darvish et al. Mar 2007 B1
7267753 Anex et al. Sep 2007 B2
7306768 Chiga Dec 2007 B2
7357255 Ginsberg et al. Apr 2008 B2
7374677 McLaughlin et al. May 2008 B2
7381707 Lin et al. Jun 2008 B2
7382601 Yoshimitsu Jun 2008 B2
7434692 Ginsberg et al. Oct 2008 B2
7452547 Lambino et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459121 Liang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7460907 Darvish et al. Dec 2008 B1
7476222 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477939 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477940 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477941 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7479133 Sun et al. Jan 2009 B2
7505250 Cho et al. Mar 2009 B2
7531094 McLaughlin et al. May 2009 B2
7600567 Christopher et al. Oct 2009 B2
7631764 Ginsberg et al. Dec 2009 B2
7650805 Nauseda et al. Jan 2010 B2
7674477 Schmid et al. Mar 2010 B1
7706128 Bourcier Apr 2010 B2
7732301 Pinnington et al. Jun 2010 B1
7761809 Bukovec et al. Jul 2010 B2
7786086 Reches et al. Aug 2010 B2
7866475 Doskoczynski et al. Jan 2011 B2
7875293 Shults et al. Jan 2011 B2
7935331 Lin May 2011 B2
7935416 Yang et al. May 2011 B2
7943167 Kulkarni et al. May 2011 B2
7960708 Wolfe et al. Jun 2011 B2
7998246 Liu et al. Aug 2011 B2
8109893 Lande Feb 2012 B2
8147599 McAlister Apr 2012 B2
8262943 Meng et al. Sep 2012 B2
8278106 Martinson et al. Oct 2012 B2
8308702 Batchvarova et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316865 Ochs et al. Nov 2012 B2
8329476 Pitkanen et al. Dec 2012 B2
8354296 Dimitrakopoulos et al. Jan 2013 B2
8361321 Stetson et al. Jan 2013 B2
8449504 Carter et al. May 2013 B2
8471562 Knizhnik Jun 2013 B2
8475689 Sun et al. Jul 2013 B2
8506807 Lee et al. Aug 2013 B2
8512669 Hauck Aug 2013 B2
8513324 Scales et al. Aug 2013 B2
8535726 Dai et al. Sep 2013 B2
8592291 Shi et al. Nov 2013 B2
8617411 Singh Dec 2013 B2
8666471 Rogers et al. Mar 2014 B2
8686249 Whitaker et al. Apr 2014 B1
8697230 Ago et al. Apr 2014 B2
8698481 Lieber et al. Apr 2014 B2
8715329 Robinson et al. May 2014 B2
8721074 Pugh et al. May 2014 B2
8734421 Sun et al. May 2014 B2
8744567 Fassih et al. Jun 2014 B2
8751015 Frewin et al. Jun 2014 B2
8753468 Caldwell et al. Jun 2014 B2
8759153 Elian et al. Jun 2014 B2
8808257 Pugh et al. Aug 2014 B2
8828211 Garaj et al. Sep 2014 B2
8840552 Brauker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8857983 Pugh et al. Oct 2014 B2
8861821 Osumi Oct 2014 B2
8894201 Pugh et al. Nov 2014 B2
8940552 Pugh et al. Jan 2015 B2
8950862 Pugh et al. Feb 2015 B2
8974055 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 B2
8975121 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 B2
8979978 Miller et al. Mar 2015 B2
8986932 Turner et al. Mar 2015 B2
8993234 Turner et al. Mar 2015 B2
8993327 McKnight et al. Mar 2015 B2
9014639 Pugh et al. Apr 2015 B2
9017937 Turner et al. Apr 2015 B1
9023220 Zurutuza Elorza et al. May 2015 B2
9028663 Stetson et al. May 2015 B2
9035282 Dimitrakopoulos et al. May 2015 B2
9045847 Batchvarova et al. Jun 2015 B2
9050452 Sun et al. Jun 2015 B2
9052533 Pugh et al. Jun 2015 B2
9056282 Miller et al. Jun 2015 B2
9062180 Scales et al. Jun 2015 B2
9067811 Bennett et al. Jun 2015 B1
9070615 Elian et al. Jun 2015 B2
9075009 Kim et al. Jul 2015 B2
9080267 Batchvarova et al. Jul 2015 B2
9095821 Ratto et al. Aug 2015 B1
9095823 Fleming Aug 2015 B2
9096050 Bedell et al. Aug 2015 B2
9096437 Tour et al. Aug 2015 B2
9102111 Pugh et al. Aug 2015 B2
9108158 Yu et al. Aug 2015 B2
9110310 Pugh et al. Aug 2015 B2
9125715 Pugh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9134546 Pugh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9156700 Zhamu et al. Oct 2015 B2
9170646 Toner et al. Oct 2015 B2
9185486 Pugh Nov 2015 B2
9193587 Bennett Nov 2015 B2
9195075 Pugh et al. Nov 2015 B2
9225375 Pugh et al. Dec 2015 B2
9388048 Zhou et al. Jul 2016 B1
9425709 Hayashi et al. Aug 2016 B2
9437370 Chen et al. Sep 2016 B2
9463421 Fleming Oct 2016 B2
9505192 Stoltenberg et al. Nov 2016 B2
9545600 Miller Jan 2017 B2
9567224 Bedworth Feb 2017 B2
9572918 Bachmann et al. Feb 2017 B2
9592475 Stoltenberg et al. Mar 2017 B2
9610546 Sinton et al. Apr 2017 B2
9656214 Miller May 2017 B2
9708640 Wu Jul 2017 B2
9713794 Choi et al. Jul 2017 B2
9742001 Zhamu et al. Aug 2017 B2
9744617 Bedworth Aug 2017 B2
9870895 Bedworth Jan 2018 B2
10005038 Stetson, Jr. et al. Jun 2018 B2
10017852 Heise Jul 2018 B2
10096679 Antunez et al. Oct 2018 B1
10118130 Swett Nov 2018 B2
10124299 Kim et al. Nov 2018 B2
10130919 Saleh Nov 2018 B1
20010036556 Jen Nov 2001 A1
20010047157 Burnett et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010055597 Liu et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020079004 Sato et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079054 Nakatani Jun 2002 A1
20020104435 Baker et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115957 Sun et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020117659 Lieber et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020183682 Darvish et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020183686 Darvish et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030052354 Dennison Mar 2003 A1
20030134281 Evans Jul 2003 A1
20030138777 Evans Jul 2003 A1
20030146221 Lauer et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159985 Siwy et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030171053 Sanders Sep 2003 A1
20040018583 Ho et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040035787 Tanga et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040061253 Kleinmeyer et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040063097 Evans Apr 2004 A1
20040099324 Fraser et al. May 2004 A1
20040111968 Day et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040112865 McCullough et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121488 Chang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040140041 Glick Jul 2004 A1
20040142463 Walker et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040185730 Lambino et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193043 Duchon et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199243 Yodfat Oct 2004 A1
20040208796 Chiga Oct 2004 A1
20040217036 Ginsberg et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040241214 Kirkwood et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040251136 Lean et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004508 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050004509 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050004550 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010161 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010192 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015042 Sun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050053563 Manissier et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050112078 Boddupalli et al. May 2005 A1
20050126966 Tanida et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050129633 Lin Jun 2005 A1
20050148996 Sun et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050170089 Lashmore et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050189673 Klug et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050226834 Lambino et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050238730 Le Fur et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060005381 Nishi et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060036332 Jennings Feb 2006 A1
20060073370 Krusic et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060093885 Krusic et al. May 2006 A1
20060121279 Petrik Jun 2006 A1
20060151382 Petrik Jul 2006 A1
20060166347 Faulstich et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060180604 Ginsberg et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060222701 Kulkarni et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060253078 Wu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070004640 Lin et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070032054 Ramaswamy et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070056894 Connors, Jr. Mar 2007 A1
20070060862 Sun et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070062856 Pahl et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070099813 Luizzi et al. May 2007 A1
20070131646 Donnelly et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070284279 Doskoczynski et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080017564 Hammond Jan 2008 A1
20080035484 Wu et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080035541 Franzreb et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045877 Levin et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080061477 Capizzo Mar 2008 A1
20080063585 Smalley et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081323 Keeley et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080081362 Keeley et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080149561 Chu et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080156648 Dudziak et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170982 Zhang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080185293 Klose et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080188836 Weber et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080190508 Booth et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080241085 Lin et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080268016 Fang et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080290020 Marand et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080290111 Ginsberg et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090023572 Backes et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032475 Ferrer Feb 2009 A1
20090039019 Raman Feb 2009 A1
20090048685 Frigstad et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090075371 Keeley et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090078640 Chu Mar 2009 A1
20090087395 Lin et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090117335 Iyoda et al. May 2009 A1
20090120873 Becker et al. May 2009 A1
20090148495 Hammer et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090176159 Zhamu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090222072 Robinson et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090236295 Braun et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241242 Beatty et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090283475 Hylton et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090291270 Zettl et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090294300 Kanzius et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090306364 Beer et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100000754 Mann et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016778 Chattopadhyay Jan 2010 A1
20100021708 Kong et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100024722 Ochs et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100024838 Ochs et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025330 Ratto et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055464 Sung Mar 2010 A1
20100059378 Elson et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100072643 Pugh et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076553 Pugh et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100098741 Ranade Apr 2010 A1
20100105834 Tour et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100110372 Pugh et al. May 2010 A1
20100124564 Martinson et al. May 2010 A1
20100127312 Grebel et al. May 2010 A1
20100161014 Lynch et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100167551 Dedontney Jul 2010 A1
20100196439 Beck et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209330 Golzhauser et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100209515 Chantalat et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100213079 Willis Aug 2010 A1
20100224555 Hoek et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228204 Beatty et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100233781 Bangera et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249273 Scales et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100258111 Shah et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100323177 Ruoff et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100327847 Leiber et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110014217 Fahmy et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110027599 Hoek et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110037033 Green et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110041519 McAlister Feb 2011 A1
20110041687 Diaz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110045523 Strano et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110054418 Pugh et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054576 Robinson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110056892 Lancaster Mar 2011 A1
20110073563 Chang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110092054 Seo et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110092949 Wang Apr 2011 A1
20110100921 Heinrich May 2011 A1
20110112484 Carter et al. May 2011 A1
20110118655 Fassih et al. May 2011 A1
20110120970 Joo et al. May 2011 A1
20110124253 Shah et al. May 2011 A1
20110132834 Tomioka Jun 2011 A1
20110139707 Siwy et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110152795 Aledo et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110186449 Clochard et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110189440 Appleby et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110201201 Arnold et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202201 Matsubara Aug 2011 A1
20110253630 Bakajin et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258791 Batchvarova et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258796 Batchvarova et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110262645 Batchvarova et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110263912 Miller et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110269920 Min et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120000845 Park et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120031833 Ho et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120048804 Stetson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120115243 Pitkanen et al. May 2012 A1
20120116228 Okubo May 2012 A1
20120145548 Sivan et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120148633 Sun et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120162600 Pugh et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120183738 Zettl et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120186850 Sugiyama et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120211367 Vecitis Aug 2012 A1
20120218508 Pugh et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120219203 Adachi Aug 2012 A1
20120220053 Lee et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120234453 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120234679 Garaj et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120235277 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120236254 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120236524 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120241371 Revanur et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120242953 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120255899 Choi et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120267337 Striemer et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120292245 Saito Nov 2012 A1
20120294793 Chen et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120298396 Hong et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301707 Kinloch et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130015136 Bennett et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130034760 Otts et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130045523 Leach et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130056367 Martinez et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130071941 Miller Mar 2013 A1
20130096292 Brahmasandra et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130100436 Jackson et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130105417 Stetson et al. May 2013 A1
20130108839 Arnold et al. May 2013 A1
20130116541 Gracias et al. May 2013 A1
20130131214 Scales et al. May 2013 A1
20130135578 Pugh et al. May 2013 A1
20130146221 Kolmakov et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130146480 Garaj et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130152386 Pandojirao-S et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130174968 Vlassiouk et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130174978 Pugh et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130176030 Simon Jul 2013 A1
20130190476 Lancaster et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130192460 Miller et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130192461 Miller Aug 2013 A1
20130194540 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130213568 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130215377 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130215378 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130215380 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130216581 Fahmy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130240355 Ho et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130240437 Rodrigues et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130248097 Ploss, Jr. Sep 2013 A1
20130248367 Stetson et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130249147 Bedworth Sep 2013 A1
20130256118 Meller et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130256139 Peng Oct 2013 A1
20130256154 Peng Oct 2013 A1
20130256210 Fleming Oct 2013 A1
20130256211 Fleming Oct 2013 A1
20130261568 Martinson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130269819 Ruby et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130270188 Karnik et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130273288 Luo et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130277305 Stetson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130277573 Miller Oct 2013 A1
20130284665 Lee et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130295150 Chantalat et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130295374 Tang et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130309776 Drndic et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130317131 Scales et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130317132 Scales et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130317133 Scales et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130323295 Scales et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130330833 Ruiz et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130335092 Wu Dec 2013 A1
20130338611 Pugh et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338744 Frewin et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140002788 Otts et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140005514 Pugh et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140015160 Kung et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140017322 Dai et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140021133 Siwy et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140030482 Miller et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140048411 Choi et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140066958 Priewe Mar 2014 A1
20140079936 Russo et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140093728 Shah et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140128891 Astani-Matthies et al. May 2014 A1
20140141521 Peng et al. May 2014 A1
20140151288 Miller Jun 2014 A1
20140151631 Duesberg et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140154464 Miller et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140170195 Fassih et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140171541 Scales et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140174927 Bashir et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140190004 Riall et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140190550 Loh et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140190676 Zhamu et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140190833 Lieber et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192313 Riall et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192314 Riall et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140199777 Ruiz et al. Jul 2014 A2
20140209539 El Badawi et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140212596 Jahangiri-Famenini Jul 2014 A1
20140230653 Yu et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140230733 Miller Aug 2014 A1
20140231351 Wickramasinghe et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140248621 Collins Sep 2014 A1
20140253131 Liu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257348 Priewe et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257515 So et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257517 Deichmann et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140259657 Riall et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140261999 Stetson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140263035 Stoltenberg et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140263178 Sinton et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140264977 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268015 Riall et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268020 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268021 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140268026 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140272286 Stoltenberg et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140272522 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140273315 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140273316 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276481 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276999 Harms et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140306361 Pugh et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140308681 Strano et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140311967 Grossman et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140315213 Nagrath et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140318373 Wood et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140322518 Addleman et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140333892 Pugh et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140335661 Pugh et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140343580 Priewe Nov 2014 A1
20140346081 Sowden et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140346631 Karim et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140349892 Van Der Zaag et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140350372 Pugh et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140377651 Kwon et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140377738 Bachmann et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150015843 Pugh et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150017918 Pugh et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150050734 Liedtke et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150053627 Silin Feb 2015 A1
20150057762 Harms et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150061990 Toner et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150062533 Toner et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150063605 Pugh Mar 2015 A1
20150066063 Priewe Mar 2015 A1
20150075667 McHugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150076056 Iyuke et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077658 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077659 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077660 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077661 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077662 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077663 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077699 De Sio et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150077702 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A9
20150079683 Yager et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150087249 Pugh et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150096935 Mitra et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150098910 Mordas et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150101931 Garaj et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150105686 Vasan Apr 2015 A1
20150118318 Fahmy et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150122727 Karnik et al. May 2015 A1
20150137817 Wilson et al. May 2015 A1
20150138454 Pugh et al. May 2015 A1
20150142107 Pugh et al. May 2015 A1
20150145155 Pugh et al. May 2015 A1
20150146162 Pugh et al. May 2015 A1
20150147474 Batchvarova et al. May 2015 A1
20150151254 Perez Jun 2015 A1
20150170788 Miller et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150174253 Sun et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150174254 Sun et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150182473 Bosnyak et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150185180 Ruhl et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150196579 Ferrante et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150196879 Brinke-Seiferth et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150202351 Kaplan et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150212339 Pugh et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150217219 Sinsabaugh Aug 2015 A1
20150218210 Stetson et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150221474 Bedworth et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150231557 Miller Aug 2015 A1
20150231577 Nair et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150247178 Mountcastle et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150248972 Tang et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150258254 Simon et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150258498 Simon et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150258502 Turowski Sep 2015 A1
20150258503 Sinton Sep 2015 A1
20150258506 Mi et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150258525 Westman et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150268150 Newkirk et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150272834 Sun et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150272896 Sun et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150273401 Miller Oct 2015 A1
20150309337 Flitsch et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150321147 Fleming Nov 2015 A1
20150321149 McGinnis Nov 2015 A1
20150323811 Flitsch et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150336202 Bedworth et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150342900 Putnins Dec 2015 A1
20150346382 Bliven et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150351887 Peters Dec 2015 A1
20150359742 Fassih et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150376448 Urs Dec 2015 A1
20150378176 Flitsch et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160009049 Stoltenberg Jan 2016 A1
20160038885 Hogen-Esch et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160043384 Zhamu et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160058932 Stetson, Jr. Mar 2016 A1
20160059190 Yoo et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160067390 Simon et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160074814 Park et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160074815 Sinton Mar 2016 A1
20160084008 Faircloth et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160084981 Kayano et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160116237 Alsadah et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160256805 Grein Sep 2016 A1
20160272499 Zurutuza Elorza et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160282326 Waduge et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160284811 Yu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160339160 Bedworth Nov 2016 A1
20170000937 Gottschalk Jan 2017 A1
20170028640 Harrison et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170032962 Zurutuza Elorza et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170035943 Simon et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170036916 Bedworth Feb 2017 A1
20170037356 Simon et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170057812 Zurutuza Elorza et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170065939 Kim et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170144107 Garaj et al. May 2017 A1
20170202885 Agulnick Jul 2017 A1
20170216923 Babenko et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170217777 Hong et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170239623 Stoltenberg et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170296706 Simon et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170296972 Sinton et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170296976 Liu Oct 2017 A1
20170296979 Swett et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180147542 Jhon May 2018 A1
20180207591 Yu et al. Jul 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (122)
Number Date Country
2037988 Sep 1992 CA
2411935 Dec 2002 CA
1128501 Aug 1996 CN
101108194 Jan 2008 CN
101243544 Aug 2008 CN
101428198 May 2009 CN
101489653 Jul 2009 CN
101996853 Mar 2011 CN
102242062 Nov 2011 CN
102344132 Feb 2012 CN
102423272 Apr 2012 CN
102592720 Jul 2012 CN
101996853 Aug 2012 CN
102637584 Aug 2012 CN
103153441 Jun 2013 CN
103182249 Jul 2013 CN
203235358 Oct 2013 CN
103480281 Jan 2014 CN
103585891 Feb 2014 CN
103603706 Feb 2014 CN
19536560 Mar 1997 DE
10 2005 049 388 Apr 2007 DE
0 364 628 Apr 1990 EP
1 034 251 Jan 2004 EP
1 777 250 Apr 2007 EP
1 872 812 Jan 2008 EP
2 060 286 May 2009 EP
2 107 120 Oct 2009 EP
2 230 511 Sep 2010 EP
1 603 609 May 2011 EP
2 354 272 Aug 2011 EP
2 450 096 May 2012 EP
2 489 520 Aug 2012 EP
2 511 002 Oct 2012 EP
2 586 473 May 2013 EP
2 679 540 Jan 2014 EP
2 937 313 Oct 2015 EP
2 995 368 Mar 2016 EP
3 070 053 Sep 2016 EP
3 084 398 Oct 2016 EP
1 538 2430.5 Mar 2017 EP
3 135 631 Mar 2017 EP
59-102111 Jul 1984 JP
10-510471 May 1995 JP
7504120 May 1995 JP
2001-232158 Aug 2001 JP
2002-126510 May 2002 JP
2004-179014 Jun 2004 JP
2005-126966 May 2005 JP
2006-188393 Jul 2006 JP
2006-262891 Oct 2006 JP
2009-291777 Dec 2009 JP
2011-168448 Sep 2011 JP
2011-241479 Dec 2011 JP
2012-500708 Jan 2012 JP
2004-202480 Jul 2014 JP
2015-503405 Feb 2015 JP
2016-175828 Oct 2016 JP
1020110084110 Jul 2011 KR
10-2012-0022164 Mar 2012 KR
1020120022164 Mar 2012 KR
1020140002570 Jan 2014 KR
WO-9333901 Mar 1993 WO
WO-9312859 Aug 1993 WO
WO-9500231 Jan 1995 WO
WO-9712664 Apr 1997 WO
WO-9830501 Jul 1998 WO
WO-0070012 Nov 2000 WO
WO-02055539 Jul 2002 WO
WO-2013115762 Aug 2003 WO
WO-2004009840 Jan 2004 WO
WO-2004082733 Sep 2004 WO
WO-2005047857 May 2005 WO
WO-2007103411 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007140252 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2008008533 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2009129984 Oct 2009 WO
WO-2010006080 Jan 2010 WO
WO-2010115904 Oct 2010 WO
WO-2011019686 Feb 2011 WO
WO-2011046706 Apr 2011 WO
WO-2011001674 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011063458 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011075158 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011094204 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011100458 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011138689 Nov 2011 WO
WO-2012006657 Jan 2012 WO
WO-2012021801 Feb 2012 WO
WO-2012027148 Mar 2012 WO
WO-2012028695 Mar 2012 WO
WO-2012030368 Mar 2012 WO
WO-2012073998 Jun 2012 WO
WO-2012125770 Sep 2012 WO
WO 2012138671 Oct 2012 WO
WO-2012142852 Oct 2012 WO
WO-2013016445 Jan 2013 WO
WO 2013048063 Apr 2013 WO
WO-2013138137 Sep 2013 WO
WO-2013138698 Sep 2013 WO
WO-2013142133 Sep 2013 WO
WO-2013142539 Sep 2013 WO
WO-2013151799 Oct 2013 WO
WO-2013152179 Oct 2013 WO
WO-2014038600 Mar 2014 WO
WO-2014084856 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014084861 Jun 2014 WO
WO-2014159043 Oct 2014 WO
WO-2014168629 Oct 2014 WO
WO-2014204722 Dec 2014 WO
PCTUS2015018114 Feb 2015 WO
WO-2015030698 Mar 2015 WO
PCTUS2015028948 May 2015 WO
WO-2015110277 Jul 2015 WO
WO-2015116857 Aug 2015 WO
WO-2015116946 Aug 2015 WO
WO-2015138736 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2015138752 Sep 2015 WO
WO-20151138771 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2015197217 Dec 2015 WO
WO-2016036888 Mar 2016 WO
WO-2016102003 Jun 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (511)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007, filed Feb. 28, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,471, filed Sep. 16, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,295, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,410, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,420, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,289, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,447, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,269, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,239, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,464, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,276, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,482, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,056, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,099, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,190, filed Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,304, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,588, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,808, filed May 8, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273, filed Aug. 5, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,198, filed Sep. 16, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/754,531, filed Jun. 29, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770, filed Jan. 30, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,657, filed Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,325, filed Jan. 29, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,580, filed Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,569, filed May 25, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,944, filed Sep. 2, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,193, filed Apr. 14, 2016.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 dated Oct. 28, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Oct. 21, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Dec. 21, 2015.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Jul. 1, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US15/13599 dated Jul. 20, 2015.
Barreiro et al. “Understanding the catalyst-free transformation of amorphous carbon into graphene by current-induced annealing,” Scientific Reports, 3 (Article 1115): 1-6 (Jan. 2013).
Botari et al., “Graphene healing mechanisms: A theoretical investigation,” Carbon, 99: 302-309 (Apr. 2016) (published online Dec. 2015).
Chen et al., “Defect Scattering in Graphene,” Physical Review Letters, 102: 236805-1-236805-4 (Jun. 2009).
Chen et al., “Self-healing of defected graphene,” Applied Physics Letters, 102(10): 103107-1-103107-5 (Mar. 2013).
Cheng et al., “Ion Transport in Complex Layered Graphene-Based Membranes with Tuneable Interlayer Spacing,” Science Advances, 2(2): e1501272 (9 pages) (Feb. 2016).
Crock et al., “Polymer Nanocomposites with Graphene-Based Hierarchical Fillers as Materials for Multifunctional Water Treatment Membranes,” Water Research, 47(12): 3984-3996 (Aug. 2013) (published online Mar. 2013).
Han et al., “Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification,” Advanced Functional Materials, 23(29): 3693-3700 (Aug. 2013).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027583 dated Jan. 13, 2017.
Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027590 dated Jan. 6, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027594 dated Jan. 13, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027628 dated Jan. 9, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027631 dated Jan. 13, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027632 dated Jan. 9, 2017.
Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/052010 dated Dec. 20, 2016.
International Search Report in PCT/US2016/027629 dated Dec. 8, 2016.
International Search Report in PCT/US2016/052007 dated Dec. 27, 2016.
Kjeldsen, T., “Yeast secretory expression of insulin precursors,” Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 54: 277-286 (May 2000).
Lin et al., “A Direct and Polymer-Free Method for Transferring Graphene Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition to Any Substrate,” ACSNANO, 8(2): 1784-1791 (Jan. 2014).
Liu et al. “Synthesis of high-quality monolayer and bilayer graphene on copper using chemical vapor deposition,” Carbon, 49(13): 4122-4130 (Nov. 2011) (published online May 2011).
O'Hern et al., “Nanofiltration across defect-sealed nanoporous monolayer graphene,” Nano Letters, 15(5): 3254-3260 (Apr. 2015).
U.S. Corrected Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,569 dated May 26, 2015.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 dated Apr. 25, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 dated Dec. 14, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,569 dated Feb. 27, 2015.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,569 dated Jul. 30, 2014.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,471 dated Dec. 1, 2016.
U.S. Restriction Requirement in U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Jul. 17, 2015.
Wang et al., “Graphene Oxide Membranes with Tunable Permeability due to Embedded Carbon Dots,” Chemical Communications, 50(86): 13089-13092 (Nov. 2014) (published online Sep. 2014).
Xu et al., “Graphene Oxide-TiO2 Composite Filtration Membranes and their Potential Application for Water Purification,” Carbon, 62: 465-471 (Oct. 2013) (published online Jun. 2013).
Zhao et al., “A glucose-responsive controlled release of insulin system based on enzyme multilayers-coated mesoporous silica particles,” Chem. Commun., 47: 9459-9461 (Jun. 2011).
AE Search and Examination Report for United Arab Emirates Application No. P186/13 dated Oct. 4, 2016.
Agenor et al., “Renal tubular dysfunction in human visceral leishmaniasis (Kala-azar),” Clinical Nephrology 71(5): 492-500 (May 2009) (available online Mar. 21, 2011).
Albert et al., “Ringer's lactate is compatible with the rapid infusion of AS-3 preserved packed red blood cells,” Can. J. Anaesth. 56(5): 352-356 (May 2009) (available online Apr. 2, 2009).
Aluru et al. “Modeling electronics on the nanoscale.” Handbook of nanoscience, engineering and technology Goddard W, Brenner D, Lyshevski S, Iafrate GJ (2002): 11-1.
Alvarenga, “Carbon nanotube materials for aerospace wiring” Rochester Institute of Technology, 2010.
AMI Applied Membranes Inc., “Filmtec Nanofiltration Membrane Elements”, Retrieved from appliedmembranes.com/nanofiltration_elements.htm, accessed Apr. 28, 2015 (2 Pages).
Aso et al., “Comparison of serum high-molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin with total adiponectin concentrations in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery using a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect HMW adiponectin,” Diabetes 55(7): 1954-1960 (Jul. 2006).
AU Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2013235234, dated Jan. 13, 2017, 4 pages.
AU Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2013363283, dated Jun. 20, 2017, 4 pages.
AU Notice of Acceptance for Australian Application No. 2011293742 dated Jan. 13, 2016.
Axelsson et al., “Acute hyperglycemia induces rapid, reversible increases in glomerular permeability in nondiabetic rats,” Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 298(6): F1306-F1312 (Jun. 2010) (available online Mar. 17, 2010).
Bains et al., “Novel lectins from rhizomes of two Acorus species with mitogenic activity and inhibitory potential towards murine cancer cell lines,” Int'l Immunopharmacol. 5(9): 1470-1478 (Aug. 2005) (available online May 12, 2005).
Baker, “Membrane Technology and Applications”, Membrane Technology and Applications; Apr. 14, 2004; pp. 92-94.
Barreiro et al. “Transport properties of graphene in the high-current limit.” Physical review letters 103.7 (2009): 076601.
Bazargani et al. “Low molecular weight heparin improves peritoneal ultrafiltration and blocks complement and coagulation,” Peritoneal Dialysis Int'l 25(4): 394-404 (Jul. 2005-Aug. 2005).
Bazargani, “Acute inflammation in peritoneal dialysis: experimental studies in rats. Characterization of regulatory mechanisms,” Swedish Dental J. Supp. 171: 1-57, i (2005).
Beppu et al., “Antidiabetic effects of dietary administration of Aloe arborescens Miller components on multiple low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice: investigation on hypoglycemic action and systemic absorption dynamics of aloe components,” J. Ethnopharmacol. 103(3): 468-77 (Feb. 20, 2006) (available online Jan. 6, 2006).
Bieri et al. “Two-dimensional Polymer Formation on Surfaces: Insight into the Roles of Precursor Mobility and Reactivity” JACS, 2010, vol. 132, pp. 16669-16676.
Bruin et al., “Maturation and function of human embryonic stem cell-derived pancreatic progenitors in macroencapsulation devices following transplant into mice”, Diabetologia (2013), vol. 56: 1987-1998 (Jun. 16, 2013).
Chu Ju, et al. “Modern Biotechnology” East China University of Technology Press, (Sep. 2007), vol. 1; pp. 306-307, ISBN 978-7-5628-2116-8.
Clochard, “Track-Etched Polymer Membranes,” Laboratory of Irradiated Solids, Ecole Polytechnique, retrieved from http://www.lsi.polytechnique.fr/home/research/physics-and-chemistry-of-nano-objects/trac . . . , Accessed Jul. 30, 2015 (2 pages).
CN Notification of Grant for Chinese Application No. 201180049184.5 dated Jun. 6, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380014845.X dated Jul. 8, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380014845.X dated Sep. 2, 2015.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380019165.5 dated Aug. 25, 2015.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380073141.X dated Jun. 8, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380073141.X dated Mar. 21, 2017.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201480015372.X dated Aug. 2, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 20118004918.5 dated Jun. 15, 2015.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180049184.5 dated Jul. 30, 2014.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180049184.5 dated Mar. 4, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380014845.X dated Dec. 23, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380017644.5 dated Feb. 7, 2017.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380017644.5 dated May 26, 2016.
CN Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380017644.5 dated Sep. 29, 2015.
CN Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201380013988.9 dated Oct. 27, 2015.
Daniel et al. “Implantable Diagnostic Device for Cancer Monitoring.” Biosens Bioelectricon. 24(11): 3252-3257 (Jul. 15, 2009).
Database WPI, Week 201238, Thomson Scientific, London, GB; AN 2012-D49442.
De Lannoy et al., “Aquatic Biofouling Prevention by Electrically Charged Nanocomposite Polymer Thin Film Membranes”, 2013 American Water Work Association membrane Technology Conference; Environmental science & technology 47.6 (2013): 2760-2768.
Deng et al., “Renal protection in chronic kidney disease: hypoxia-inducible factor activation vs. angiotensin II blockade,” Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 299(6): F1365-F1373 (Dec. 2010) (available online Sep. 29, 2010).
Edwards, “Large Sheets of Graphene Film Produced for Transparent Electrodes (w/ Video)”; (Jun. 21, 2010), PhysOrg.com, retrieved on May 15, 2017 from https://phys.org/news/2010-06-large-sheets-graphene-transparentelectrodes.html (2 pages).
EP Office Action for European Application No. 13715529.7 dated Jun. 24, 2016.
Fayerman, “Canadian scientists use stem cells to reverse diabetes in mice”, The Telegraph-Journal (New Brunswick), 1-2 (Jun. 29, 2012).
Fayerman, “Diabetes reversed in mice; University of B.C. scientists use embryonic stem cells to deal with Type 1 disease”, The Vancouver Sun (British Columbia), 1-2 (Jun. 28, 2012).
Fejes et al. “A review of the properties and CVD synthesis of coiled carbon nanotubes.” Materials 3.4 (2010): 2618-2642.
Franzen, C. “MIT Setting Up Industrial-Scale Graphene Printing Press” Sep. 23, 2011, retrieved from http://talkingpointsmemo.com/idealab/mit-setting-up-industrial-scale-graphene-printing-press (2 pages).
Freedman et al., “Genetic basis of nondiabetic end-stage renal disease,” Semin. Nephrol. 30(2): 101-110 (Mar. 2010).
Garcia-Lopez et al., “Determination of high and low molecular weight molecules of icodextrin in plasma and dialysate, using gel filtration chromatography, in peritoneal dialysis patients,” Peritoneal Dialysis Int'l 25(2): 181-191 (Mar. 2005-Apr. 2005).
Georgakilas et al., “Functionalization of Graphene: Covalent and Non-Covalent Approaches, Derivatives and Applications,” Chem. Rev., (2012) 112(11), pp. 6156-6214.
Gnudi “Molecular mechanisms of proteinuria in diabetes,” Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36(5): 946-949 (Oct. 2008).
Gotloib et al., “Peritoneal dialysis in refractory end-stage congestive heart failure: a challenge facing a no-win situation,” Nephrol. Dialysis. Transplant. 20(Supp. 7): vii32-vii36 (Jul. 2005).
Harvey “Carbon as conductor: a pragmatic view.” Proceedings of the 61st IWCS Conference, http://www. iwcs. org/archives/56333-iwcs-2012b-1.1584632. vol. 1. 2012.
Hashimoto et al. “Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers.” Nature 430.7002 (2004): 870-873.
He, et al. “The attachment of Fe3 O4 nanoparticles to graphene oxide by covalent bonding.” Carbon 48.11 (2010): 3139-3144.
Hone et al. “Graphene has record-breaking strength” Physicsworld.com, Jul. 17, 2008.
Huang et al., “Gene expression profile in circulating mononuclear cells afterexposure to ultrafine carbon particles,” Inhalation Toxicol. 22(10): 835-846 (Aug. 2010).
Humplik, et al. “Nanostructured materials for water desalination.” Nanotechnology 22.29 (2011): 292001.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 5, 2012 for related International Application No. PCT/US11/47800.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 5, 2017 from related PCT application PCT/US2017/024147.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 12, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/074942.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/047800 dated Jan. 5, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/023027 dated Jun. 26, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2013/030344 dated Jun. 19, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2013/033035 dated Jun. 28, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2013/033400, dated Jun. 28, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2013/033403 dated Jun. 28, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/041766, dated Sep. 30, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2014 in International Application No. PCT/US2014/021677.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 6, 2014 in International Application No. PCT/US2014/023043.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 16, 2014, for International Application No. PCT/US2014/051011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 19, 2015, in International Application No. PCT/US2015/020287.
Inui et al. “Molecular dynamics simulations of nanopore processing in a graphene sheet by using gas cluster ion beam.” Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing 98.4 (2010): 787-794.
Israelachvili, “Intermolecular and Surface Forces,” 3rd ed., Chap.7.1, Sizes of Atoms, Molecules, and Ions, 2011, 1 page.
Jiao et al., “Castration differentially alters basal and leucine-stimulated tissue protein synthesis in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue,” Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 297(5): E1222-1232 (Nov. 2009) (available online Sep. 15, 2009).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-501729 dated Dec. 9, 2016 (English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-501729 dated Jun. 20, 2017 (English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-501867 dated Oct. 11, 2016 (English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-503405 dated Nov. 14, 2016 (English translation).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-503406 dated Dec. 6, 2016(English translation).
Kang et al., “Effect of eplerenone, enalapril and their combination treatment on diabetic nephropathy in type II diabetic rats,” Nephrol. Dialysis Transplant. 24(1): 73-84 (Jan. 2009).
Kang et al., “Efficient Transfer of Large-Area Graphene Films onto Rigid Substrates by Hot Pressing,” American Chemical Society Nano, 6(6): 5360-5365(May 28, 2012).
Kar et al., “Effect of glycation of hemoglobin on its interaction with trifluoperazine,” Protein J. 25(3): 202-211 (Apr. 2006) (available online Jun. 6, 2006).
Kawamoto et al., “Serum high molecular weight adiponectin is associated with mild renal dysfunction in Japanese adults,” J. Atherosclerosis Thrombosis 17(11): 1141-1148 (Nov. 27, 2011).
Khun et al. “From Microporous Regular Frameworks to Mesoporous Materials with Ultrahigh Surface Area: Dynamic reorganization of Porous Polvmer Networks” JACS, 2008; vol. 130; pp. 13333-13337.
Krupka et al., “Measurements of the Sheet Resistance and Conductivity of Thin Epitaxial Graphene and SiC Films” Applied Physics Letters 96, 082101-I; Feb. 23, 2010.
Kumar et al., “Modulation of alpha-crystallin chaperone activity in diabetic rat lens by curcumin,” Molecular Vision 11: 561-568 (Jul. 26, 2005).
Lathuiliere et al., “Encapsulated Cellular Implants for Recombinant Protein Delivery and Therapeutic Modulation of the Immune System,” Journal of Applied Physics, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 16: 10578-10600 (May 8, 2015).
Lee, et al. “Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene.” science 321.5887 (2008): 385-388.
Lucchese et al. “Quantifying ion-induced defects and Raman relaxation length in graphene.” Carbon 48.5 (2010): 1592-1597.
MacLeod et al. “Supramolecular Orderinng in Oligothiophene-Fullerene Monolayers” JACS, 2009, vol. 131, pp. 16844-16850.
Mattevi et al. “A review of chemical vapour deposition of graphene on copper.” Journal of Materials Chemistry 21.10 (2011): 3324-3334.
Miao et al. “Chemical vapor deposition of grapheme” INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2011.
MIT/MTL Center for Graphene Devices and 2D Systems, retrieved from: http://www-mtl.mit.edu/wpmu/graphene/ [retrieved from Aug. 21, 2014 archive] (3 pages).
MIT/MTL Center for Graphene Devices and 2D Systems, retrieved from: http://www-mtl.mit.edu/wpmu/graphene/ [retrieved from Mar. 4, 2015 archive] (3 pages).
Nafea, et al. “Immunoisolating semi-permeable membranes for cell encapsulation: focus on hydrogels.” J Control Release. 154(2): 110-122 (Sep. 5, 2011).
Nezlin, “Circulating non-immune IgG complexes in health and disease,” Immunol. Lett. 122(2); 141-144 (Feb. 21, 2009) (available online Feb. 2, 2009).
Norata et al., “Plasma adiponectin levels in chronic kidney disease patients: relation with molecular inflammatory profile and metabolic status,” Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 20(1): 56-63 (Jan. 2010) (available online Apr. 9, 2009).
Ogawa et al., “Exosome-like vesicles in Gloydius blomhoffii blomhoffii venom,” Toxicon 51(6): 984-993 (May 2008) (available online Feb. 19, 2008).
Ohgawara et al. “Assessment of pore size of semipermeable membrane for immunoisolation on xenoimplatntation of pancreatic B cells using a diffusion chamber.” Transplant Proc. (6): 3319-3320. 1995.
Oki et al., “Combined acromegaly and subclinical Cushing disease related to high-molecular-weight adrenocorticotropic hormone,” J. Neurosurg. 110(2): 369-73 (Feb. 2009).
Osorio et al., “Effect of treatment with losartan on salt sensitivity and SGLT2 expression in hypertensive diabetic rats,” Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 86(3): e46-e49 (Dec. 2009) (available online Oct. 2, 2009).
Osorio et al., “Effect of phlorizin on SGLT2 expression in the kidney of diabetic rats,” J. Nephrol. 23(5): 541-546 (Sep.-Oct. 2010).
Padidela et al., “Elevated basal and post-feed glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) concentrations in the neonatal period,” Eur. J. Endocrinol. 160(1): 53-58 (Jan. 2009) (available online Oct. 24, 2008).
Pall Corporation, “Pall Water Processing Disc-Tube Filter Technology”, Retrieved on Feb. 10, 2015, Retrieved from http://www.pall.com /pdfs/Fuels-and-Chemicals/Disc-Tube_Filter_Technoloqy-DT100b.pdF (15 Pages).
Plant et al. “Size-dependent propagation of Au nanoclusters through few-layer grapheme,” The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013, Nanoscale.
Pollard, “Growing Graphene via Chemical Vapor” Department of Physics, Pomona College; May 2, 2011.
Rafael et al. “Cell Transplantation and Immunoisolation: Studies on a macroencapsultaion device.” From the Departments of Transplantation Pathology: Stockholm, Sweden (1999).
Rezania et al., “Enrichment of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived NKX6.1-Expressing Pancreatic Progenitor Cells Accelerates the Maturation of Insulin-Secreting Cells In Vivo”, Stem Cells Regenerative Medicine, vol. 31: 2432-2442 (Jul. 29, 2013).
Rezania et al., “Maturation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Pancreatic Progenitors Into Functional Islets Capable of Treating Pre-existing Diabetes in Mice”, Diabetes Journal, vol. 61: 2016-2029 (Aug. 1, 2012).
Ribeiro et al., “Binary Mutual Diffusion Coefficients of Aqueous Solutions of Sucrose, Lactose, Glucose, and Fructose in the Temperature Range from (298.15 to 328.15) K,” J. Chem. Eng. Data 51(5): 1836-1840 (Sep. 2006) (available online Jul. 20, 2006).
Rippe et al., “Size and charge selectivity of the glomerular filter in early experimental diabetes in rats,” Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 293(5): F1533-F1538 (Nov. 2007)(available online Aug. 15, 2007).
SA Final Rejection for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340400 dated Jan. 28, 2016.
SA First Examination Report for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340401 dated Apr. 28, 2015.
SA First Examination Report for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340424 dated May 10, 2015.
SA First Examination Report for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340426 dated May 12, 2015.
SA First Examination Report in Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340400 dated Apr. 13, 2015.
SA Second Examination Report for Saudi Arabia Application No. 113340400 dated Aug. 11, 2015.
Sanchez, et al. “Biological Interactions of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials—An Interdisciplinary Review.” Chem Res Toxicol. 25(1): 15-34 (Jan. 13, 2012).
Sethna et al., “Serum adiponectin levels and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric renal transplant recipients,” Transplantation 88(8): 1030-1037 (Oct. 27, 2009).
Sullivan et al., “Microarray analysis reveals novel gene expression changes associated with erectile dysfunction in diabetic rats,” Physiol. Genom. 23(2): 192-205 (Oct. 17, 2005) (available online Aug. 23, 2005).
Swett et al, “Imagining and Sculpting Graphene on the atomic scale” Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL) Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS) Biannual Review. 1 page.
Swett et al, “Supersonic Nanoparticle Interaction with Suspended CVD Graphene”, Microsc. Microanal. 22 (Suppl 3): 1670-1671 (Jul. 25, 2016).
Takata et al., “Hyperresistinemia is associated with coexistence of hypertension and type 2 diabetes,” Hypertension 51. 2 (Feb. 2008): 534-9.
Tamborlane et al., “Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes” N Engl J Med 359;14: 1464-1476 (Oct. 2, 2008).
Tanugi et al., “Nanoporous Graphene Could Outperform Best Commercial Water Desalination Techniques,”; ACS 2012; Jun. 25, 2012; Weftec 2012; Sep. 29-Oct. 3.
Totani et al. “Gluten binds cytotoxic compounds generated in heated frying oil.” Journal of oleo science 57.12 (2008): 683-690.
Tsukamoto et al. “Purification, characterization and biological activities of a garlic oliqosaccharide,” Journal of UOEH 30. 2 (Jun. 1, 2008): 147-57.
TW Office Action in Taiwanese Application No. 102146079 dated Apr. 14, 2017. 9 Pages.(English translation).
TW Search Report in Taiwanese Application No. 102146079 dated Apr. 14, 2017. 1 page.
UMEA Universitet “Graphene nanoscrolls are formed by decoration of magnetic nanoparticles.” ScienceDaily. Aug. 15, 2013. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130815084402.htm (3 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,150 dated Sep. 25, 2012.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,539 dated Aug. 18, 2015.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,539 dated Jul. 23, 2015.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/719,579 dated May 20, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276 dated Oct. 7, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,896 dated Apr. 1, 2015.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Aug. 29, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Jun. 2, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Sep. 12, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,085 dated Jan. 15, 2015.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,085 dated Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,503 dated Oct. 14, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,503 dated Oct. 5, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,195 dated Jul. 5, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,530 dated Aug. 1, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,655 dated Dec. 9, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,150 dated Sep. 25, 2012.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276 dated Jan. 19, 2017.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Aug. 29, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Sep. 12, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 dated May 5, 2017.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,580 dated May 8, 2017.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 dated Jun. 9, 2017.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,464 dated Jun. 16, 2017.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/548,539 dated Feb. 6, 2015.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/719,579 dated Jul. 8, 2015.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/719,579 dated May 4, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276 dated Apr. 22, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276 dated Oct. 6, 2015.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,896 dated Sep. 24, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Aug. 11, 2014.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated May 28, 2015.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,958 dated Nov. 18, 2015.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/923,503 dated Mar. 22, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/031,300 dated Jan. 20, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/031,300 dated Jul. 7, 2015.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,195 dated Mar. 21, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,195 dated Nov. 4, 2015.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,530 dated Feb. 29, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,655 dated Aug. 10, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,190 dated May 18, 2017.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,657 dated Jul. 7, 2017.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/686,452 dated Jun. 9, 2017.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,944 dated Jun. 23, 2017.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,471 dated May 31, 2017.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,741 dated Dec. 1, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,944 dated Feb. 9, 2017.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,545 dated Dec. 19, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,441 dated Jun. 5, 2017.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Apr. 24, 2017.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,617 dated Apr. 4, 2017.
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,335 dated Apr. 25, 2017.
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,982 dated Jan. 30, 2017.
U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,276 dated Nov. 29, 2016.
Vallon,“Micropuncturing the nephron,” Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology 458. 1 (May 2009): 189-201.
Van Der Zande et al. “Large-scale arrays of single-layer graphene resonators.” Nano letters 10.12 (2010): 4869-4873.
Verdonck, P., “Plasma Etching”, in Oficina de Microfabricao: Projeto e Construcao de CI's MOS, Swart, J.W., Ed., Campinas (Sao Paulo, Brazil): UNICAMP, 2006, ch. 10, p. 9.
Vlassiouk et al. “Large scale atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of graphene.” Carbon 54 (2013): 58-67.
Vriens et al. “Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies.” European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 37.7 (2010): 1408-1425.
Wang et al., “Direct Observation of a Long-Lived Single-Atom Catalyst Chiseling Atomic Structures in Graphene,” Nano Lett., 2014, pp. A-F.
Wang et al., “Porous Nanocarbons: Molecular Filtration and Electronics,” Advances in Graphene Science, Edited by Mahmood Aliofkhazraei, (2013) ISBN 978-953-51-1182-5, Publisher: InTech; Chapter 6, pp. 119-160.
Wang et al.,“What is the role of the second “structural” NADP+-binding site in human glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase?,” Protein science a publication of the Protein Society 17. 8 (Aug. 2008): 1403-11.
Wei et al., “Synthesis of N-doped graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its electrical properties”, Nano Lett. 2009 9 1752-58.
Xiaogan Liang et al., Formation of Bandgap and Subbands in Graphene Nanomeshes with Sub-10nm Ribbon Width Fabricated via Nanoimprint Lithography., Nano Letters, Jun. 11, 2010, pp. 2454-2460.
Xie et al., “Fractionation and characterization of biologically-active polysaccharides from Artemisia tripartite,” Phytochemistry 69. 6 (Apr. 2008): 1359-71.
Xie, et al. “Controlled fabrication of high-quality carbon nanoscrolls from monolayer graphene.” Nano letters 9.7 (2009): 2565-2570.
Yagil et al. “Nonproteinuric diabetes-associated nephropathy in the Cohen rat model of type 2 diabetes” Diabetes 54. 5 (May 2005): 1487-96.
Zan et al. “Interaction of Metals with Suspended Graphene Observed by Transmission Electron Microscopy”, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., Mar. 8, 2012, 3, 953-958.
Zhang et al. “Effect of Chemical Oxidation on the Structure of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes”, J. Phys. Chem., Feb. 12, 2003, B 107 3712-8.
Zhang et al. “Method for anisotropic etching of graphite or graphene” Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Peop. Rep. China; Mar. 30, 2011.
Zhang et al. “Production of Graphene Sheets by Direct Dispersion with Aromatic Healing Agents”, Small, May 6, 2010, vol. 6, No. 10, 1100-1107.
Zhang et al. “Isolation and activity of an alpha-amylase inhibitor from white kidney beans,” Yao xue xue bao=Acta pharmaceutica Sinica 42. 12 (Dec. 2007): 1282-7.
Zhao, et al. “Efficient preparation of large-area graphene oxide sheets for transparent conductive films.” ACS nano 4.9 (2010): 5245-5252.
Zhou, K., et al., “One-pot preparation of graphene/ Fe304 composites by a solvothermal reaction,” New J. Chem., 2010, 34, 2950.
Zhu et al. “Carbon Nanotubes in Biomedicine and Biosensing”, Carbon Nanotubes-Growth and Applications, InTech, (Aug. 9, 2011) Chapter 6: pp. 135-162. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/carbon-nanotubes-growth-and-applications/carbon-nanotubes-in-biomedicine-and-biosensing.
Ziegelmeier et al. “Adipokines influencing metabolic and cardiovascular disease are differentially regulated in maintenance hemodialysis,” Metabolism: clinical and experimental 57. 10 (Oct. 2008): 1414-21.
Zirk et al. “A refractometry-based glucose analysis of body fluids,” Medical engineering & physics 29. 4 (May 2007): 449-58.
Zyga “Nanoporous Graphene Could Outperform Best Commercial Water Desalination Techniques,” Phys.org., Jun. 22, 2012, Retrieved from http://www.phys.org/pdf259579929.pdf [Last Accessed Dec. 3, 2014] (3 pages).
CN Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201580006829.5 dated Aug. 1, 2017. (English translation) (8 pages).
EP Office Action for European Application No. 15743307.9 dated Aug. 8, 2017. (17 pages).
European Search Report dated Aug. 28, 2017 from related EP application 15743750.0. (7 pages).
IL Office Action in Israel Application No. 234685 dated Jun. 25, 2017. (2 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 14, 2017 from related PCT application PCT/US2017/031537. (12 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 5, 2017 from related PCT application PCT/US2017/024147. (16 pages).
Jiang, L. et al., Design of advanced porous grapheme materials: from grapheme nanomesh to 3D architectures. Nanoscale, Oct. 16, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 1922-1945.
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-503405 dated Jun. 28, 2017. (English translation) (6 pages).
JP Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-549508 dated Jun. 27, 2017 (English translation) (7 pages).
Li, R.H. “Materials for immunoisolated cell transplantation”. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 33, 87-109 (1998).
Schweitzer, Handbook of Separation Techniques for Chemical Engineers, 1979, McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 2-5 to 2-8.
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 14, 2017 for Singapore Application No. 11201606287V. (10 pages).
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 22, 2017 for Singapore Application No. 11201607584P. (7 pages).
Sears et al., “Recent Developments in Carbon Nanotube Membranes for Water Purification and Gas Separation” Materials, vol. 3 (Jan. 4, 2010), pp. 127-149.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Sep. 6, 2017. (9 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 dated Sep. 26, 2017. (12 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,580 dated Sep. 5, 2017. (8 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,982 dated Sep. 21, 2017. (5 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,657 dated Jul. 7, 2017. (7 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,193 dated Jul. 19, 2017. (13 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/289,944 dated Jul. 13, 2017. (18 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,982 dated Aug. 18, 2017. (9 pages).
EPO Extended Search Report for European Application No. 171684883.5 dated Jul. 25, 2017 (8 pages).
EPO Supplementary Search Report for European Application No. 15762019.6 dated Aug. 9, 2017 (16 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,099 dated Oct. 5, 2017 (11 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,447 dated Oct. 3, 2017 (21 pages).
Weisen, et al., “Fabrication of nanopores in a graphene sheet with heavy ions: A molecular dynamics study”, Journal of Applied Physics 114, 234304 (2013), pp. 234304-1 to 234304-6.
Australian Office Action in Application No. 2013235234 dated Dec. 19, 2017 (5 pages).
Japanese Office Action in Application No. 2017-002652 dated Nov. 24, 2017 (with English translation) (7 pages).
Chu, L., et al., “Porous graphene sandwich/poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites with high dielectric properties,” Composites Science and Technology, 86, (2013), pp. 70-75.
European Extended Search Report in Application No. 15743307.9 dated Nov. 15, 2017 (14 pages).
European Extended Search Report in Application No. 15755350.4 dated Oct. 30, 2017 (9 pages).
European Extended Search Report in Application No. 15762019.6 dated Nov. 20, 2017 (12 pages).
European Extended Search Report in Application No. 15762213.5 dated Oct. 10, 2017 (8 pages).
Gu et al., “One-step synthesis of porous graphene-based hydrogels containing oil droplets for drug delivery”, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), vol. 4, No. 7, Jan. 1, 2014, pp. 3211-3218.
Japanese Office Action in Application No. 2015-549508 dated Nov. 7, 2017 (with English translation) (2 pages).
Kim et al., “Selective Gas Transport Through Few-Layered Graphene and Graphene Oxide Membranes”, Science, vol. 342, Oct. 4, 2013, pp. 91-95 (6 total pages).
Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. 11201609272T dated Oct. 5, 2017 (11 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,464 dated Nov. 16, 2017 (5 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,982 dated Nov. 1, 2017 (9 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,808 dated Nov. 6, 2017 (27 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,193 dated Dec. 28, 2017 (25 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,304 dated Nov. 24, 2017 (23 pages).
Wang, M., et al., “Interleaved Porous Laminate Composed of Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets and Carbon Black Spacers by In-Situ Electrophoretic Deposition,” The Royal Society of Chemistry (2014), pp. 1-3.
Wimalasiri, Y., et al., “Carbon nanotube/graphene composite for enhanced capacitive deionization performance,” Carbon 59 (2013), pp. 464-471.
Bose et al.,“Microfabricated immune-isolating devices for transplanting therapeutic cells in vivo”, Koch Institute of Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Undated (1 page).
Indian Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 7731/DELNP/2014 dated Jul. 26, 2018 (6 pages).
Japanese Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 2017-002652 dated Jul. 3, 2018 (8 pages).
Linnert, “Welding Metallurgy—Carbon and Alloy Steels”, vol. I—Fundamentals (4th Edition), Chapter 2—The Structure of Metals, GML Publications, American Welding Society (AWS), Year: 1994, pp. 17-74. Retrieved from app.knovel.com/hotlink/pdf/id:kt0095RCL3/welding-metallurgy-carbon/structure-metals.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,808 dated Jun. 27, 2018 (28 pages).
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,482 dated Aug. 27, 2018 (10 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,239 dated Jul. 12, 2018 (31 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,304 dated Aug. 27, 2018 (22 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,420 dated Aug. 8, 2018 (8 pages).
Vatanpour et al., “Fabrication and characterization of novel antifouling nanofiltration membrane prepared from oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone nanocomposite”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 375, Elsevier, Apr. 6, 2011, pp. 284-294.
Zhang et al., “Synergetic effects of oxidized carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide on fouling control and anti-fouling mechanism of polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 448, Elsevier, Aug. 7, 2013, pp. 81-92.
European Extended Search Report in Application No. 15837617.8 dated Mar. 22, 2018 (9 pages).
Singapore Written Opinion for Appl. Ser. No. 11201607584P dated Jun. 8, 2018 (7 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,410 dated Jun. 13, 2018 (15 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,441 dated Jun. 12, 2018 (8 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,056 dated May 29, 2018 (33 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,289 dated Jun. 7, 2018 (16 pages).
Office Action for Indian Appl. Ser. No. 1566/DELNP/2013 dated Feb. 2, 2018 (7 pages).
Office Action for Japanese Appl. Ser. No. 2016-521448 dated Mar. 16, 2018 (5 pages).
Skrzypek et al., “Pancreatic islet macroencapsulation using microwell porous membranes”, Scientific Reports, 7: 9186 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-09647-7, Aug. 23, 2017 (12 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,464 dated Feb. 28, 2018 (5 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,276 dated Mar. 22, 2018 (13 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,441 dated Mar. 22, 2018 (7 pages).
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,289 dated Oct. 15, 2018 (14 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,657 dated Oct. 10, 2018 (6 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,808 dated Nov. 15, 2018 (34 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,099 dated Sep. 27, 2018 (13 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,269 dated Oct. 5, 2018 (11 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,276 dated Nov. 1, 2018 (13 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,056 dated Nov. 16, 2018 (8 pages).
Chen et al., “Hierarchically porous graphene-based hybrid electrodes with excellent electrochemical performance”, Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, vol. 1, No. 33, Jan. 1, 2013, pp. 9409-9413.
Chinese Office Action in Application No. 201580006829.5 dated Jan. 23, 2018 (with English translation) (13 pages).
European Extended Search Report in Application No. 15786691.4 dated Dec. 1, 2017 (10 pages).
European Extended Search Report in Application No. 15789852.9 dated Dec. 6, 2017 (8 pages).
Japanese Office Action in Application No. 2017-042023 dated Jan. 9, 2018 (with English translation) (9 pages).
Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. 11201701654U dated Dec. 6, 2017 (6 pages).
Taiwanese Office Action in Application No. 102146079 dated Dec. 12, 2017 (with English translation) (4 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,944 dated Feb. 9, 2018 (9 pages).
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,482 dated Feb. 23, 2018 (9 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,190 dated Jan. 10, 2018 (14 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,471 dated Jan. 11, 2018 (36 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,099 dated Feb. 15, 2018 (13 pages).
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,588 dated Feb. 1, 2018 (6 pages).
Wang et al., “Preparation of high-surface-area carbon nanoparticle/graphene composites”, Carbon, Elsevier, Oxford, GB, vol. 50, No. 10, Apr. 8, 2012, pp. 3845-3853.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/452,704, filed Mar. 15, 2011, Russo et al.
Apel et al. “Effect of nanosized surfactant molecules on the etching or ion tracks: New degrees or freedom in design of pore shape”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 209, Aug. 2003, pp. 329-344.
Australian Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 2015252784 dated Mar. 25, 2019 (11 pages).
Australian Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 2015255756 dated Feb. 22, 2019 (5 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Appl. Ser. No. 16833430.8 dated Apr. 25, 2019 (11 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Appl. Ser. No. 16833432.4 dated Apr. 16, 2019 (14 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Appl. Ser. No. 16833433.2 dated Mar. 4, 2019 (15 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Appl. Ser. No. PCT/US2018/065514 (16 pages).
Japanese Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 2016-565216 dated Feb. 26, 2019 (7 pages).
Kim et al., “High quality reduced graphene oxide through repairing with multi-layered graphene ball nanostructures”, Scientific Reports, vol. 3, No. 1, Nov. 19, 2013, pp. 1-6.
Singapore Written Opinion for Appl. Ser. No. 11201800845X dated Feb. 26, 2019 (8 pages).
Singapore Written Opinion for Appl. Ser. No. 11201800883R dated Feb. 22, 2019 (7 pages).
Singapore Written Opinion for Appl. Ser. No. 11201800968Q dated Feb. 19, 2019 (6 pages).
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,269 dated Apr. 18, 2019 (7 pages).
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,304 dated Apr. 19, 2019 (27 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,657 dated Mar. 28, 2019 (9 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/686,452 dated May 3, 2019 (7 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,193 dated May 2, 2019 (19 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/410,457 dated Feb. 28, 2019 (13 pages).
Canadian Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 2,865,648 dated Jan. 16, 2019 (4 pages).
EPO Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 13714806.0 dated Dec. 5, 2018 (6 pages).
EPO Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 15786691.4 dated Dec. 5, 2018 (6 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Appl. Ser. No. 16833431.6 dated Feb. 25, 2019 (16 pages).
Koenig et al., “Selective Molecular Sieving Through Porous Graphene”, Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 7, No. 11, pp. 728-732 (Including Supplementary Informaton) (23 pages).
U.S. Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,289 dated Jan. 8, 2019 (6 pages).
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/686,452 dated Dec. 13, 2018 (6 pages).
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,099 dated Jan. 2, 2019 (13 pages).
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,239 dated Feb. 21, 2019 (26 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,482 dated Jan. 31, 2019 (13 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,289 dated Jan. 18, 2019 (7 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,410 dated Jan. 3, 2019 (9 pages).
CN Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201380013988.9 dated Aug. 18, 2016 (English translation not readily available).
Cohen-Tanugi, “Nanoporous graphene as a water desalination membrane,” (Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (Jun. 2015).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/020296 dated Jun. 17, 2015.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 dated Aug. 12, 2016.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,190 dated Aug. 29, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,580 dated Jun. 2, 2016.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,273 dated Jul. 6, 2016.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,198 dated Jun. 3, 2016.
Yoon, “Simulations show how to turn graphene's defects into assets,” ScienceDaily (Oct. 4, 2016), www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161004120428.htm.
Zhang et al. Modern Thin-Film Technology 284-285 (Metallurgical Industry Press, 1st ed. 2009) (English translation not readily available).
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,770 dated Jan. 23, 2017.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,198 dated Feb. 10, 2017.
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,198 dated Mar. 1, 2017.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/193,007 dated Mar. 23, 2017.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,580 dated Feb. 9, 2017.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/843,944 dated Jan. 6, 2017.
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,464 dated Mar. 10, 2017.
Adiga et al., “Nanoporous Materials for Biomedical Devices,” JOM 60: 26-32 (Mar. 25, 2008).
Allen et al., “Craters on silicon surfaces created by gas cluster ion impacts,” Journal of Applied Physics, 92(7): 3671-8 (Oct. 2002).
AMI Applied Membranes Inc. (undated). FilmTec Nanofiltration Membrane Elements. Retrieved Jun. 1, 2016, from http://www.appliedmembranes.com/filmtec-nanofiltration-membrane-elements.html.
Apel, “Track etching technique in membrane technology,” Radiation Measurements 34(1-6): 559-566 (Jun. 2001).
Atmeh et al., “Albumin Aggregates: Hydrodynamic Shape and Physico-Chemical Properties,” Jordan Journal of Chemistry, 2(2): 169-182 (2007).
Bae et al., “Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes,” Nature Nanotechnology 5: 574-578 (Jun. 20, 2010).
Bai et al., “Graphene nanomesh,” Nature Nanotechnology 5: 190-194 (Feb. 14, 2010).
Baker. (2004). “Track-etch Membranes.” In Membrane Technology and Applications (2nd ed., pp. 92-94). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Butler et al. “Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Two-Dimensional Materials Beyond Graphene”, Materials Review 7(4): 2898-2926 (Mar. 6, 2013).
Chen et al., “Mechanically Strong, Electrically Conductive, and Biocompatible Graphene Paper,” Adv. Mater., 20(18): 3557-3561 (Sep. 2008) (available online Jul. 2008).
Chhowalla et al., “The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets,” Nature Chemistry 5: 263-275 (Mar. 20, 2013).
Childres et al., “Effect of oxygen plasma etching on graphene studied using Raman spectroscopy and electronic transport measurements,” New Journal of Physics 13 (Feb. 10, 2011).
Clochard. (undated). Radiografted track-etched polymer membranes for research and application [Scholarly project]. In Laboratoire Des Solides Irradiés. Retrieved Jun. 2, 2016, from http://iramis.cea.fr/radiolyse/5juin2015/Clochard.pdf.
Cohen-Tanugi et al, “Water Desalination across Nanoporous Graphene,” ACS Nano Letters 12(7): 3602-3608 (Jun. 5, 2012).
Colton, “Implantable biohybrid artificial organs,” Cell Transplantation 4(4): 415-436 (Jul.-Aug. 1995).
Desai et al., “Nanoporous microsystems for islet cell replacement,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 56: 1661-1673 (Jul. 23, 2004).
Dong et al., “Growth of large-sized graphene thin-films by liquid precursor-based chemical vapor deposition under atmospheric pressure,” Carbon 49(11): 3672-3678 (May 2011).
Fischbein et al., “Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets,” Applied Physics Letters 93(113107): 1-3, (Sep. 16, 2008).
Fissell et al., “High-Performance Silicon Nanopore Hemofiltration Membranes,” NIH-PA Author Manuscript, PMC, (Jan. 5, 2010), also published in J. Memb. Sci. 326(1): 58-63 (Jan. 5, 2009).
Fuertes et al., “Carbon composite membranes from Matrimid® and Kapton® polyimides for gas separation,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 33: 115-125 (Dec. 1999).
Galashev, “Computer study of the removal of Cu from the graphene surface using Ar clusters,” Computational Materials Science, 98:123-128 (Feb. 2015) (available online Nov. 2014).
Gimi et al., “A Nanoporous, Transparent Microcontainer for Encapsulated Islet Therapy,” J. Diabetes Sci. Tech. 3(2): 1-7 (Mar. 2009).
Hong et al., “Graphene multilayers as gates for multi-week sequential release of proteins from surfaces,” NIH-PA Author Manuscript PMC (Jun. 1, 2014), also published in ACS Nano, Jan. 24, 2012; 6(1): 81-88 (first published online Dec. 29, 2011).
Hu et al., “Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes,” Environmental Science & Technology 47(8): 3715-3723 (Mar. 14, 2013).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/013805 dated Apr. 30, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/018114 dated Jun. 3, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/020246 dated Jun. 10, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/028948 dated Jul. 16, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/029932 dated Oct. 6, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027607 dated Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027616 dated Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027596 dated Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027603 dated Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027610 dated Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027612 dated Jul. 22, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/027637 dated Jun. 22, 2016.
International Search Report in PCT/US15/20201 dated Jun. 10, 2015.
International Search Report in PCT/US2015/048205 dated Dec. 4, 2015.
Inui et al., “Molecular dynamics simulations of nanopore processing in a graphene sheet by using gas cluster ion beam,” Appl. Phys. A, 98: 787-794 (Mar. 2010) (available online Dec. 2009).
Jiang et al., “Porous Graphene as the Ultimate Membrane for Gas Separation,” Nano Letters 9(12): 4019-4024 (Sep. 23, 2009).
Joshi et al., “Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes”, Science 343(6172): 752-754 (Feb. 14, 2014).
Kanani et al., “Permeability—Selectivity Analysis for Ultrafiltration: Effect of Pore Geometry,” NIH-PA Author Manuscript, PMC, (Mar. 1, 2011), also published in J. Memb. Sci. 349(1-2): 405 (Mar. 1, 2010).
Karan et al., “Ultrafast Viscous Permeation of Organic Solvents Through Diamond-Like Carbon Nanosheets,” Science 335: 444-447 (Jan. 27, 2012).
Kim et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of Large Area, Semiconducting Nanoperforated Graphene Materials,” Nano Letters 10(4): 1125-1131 (Mar. 1, 2010).
Kim et al., “The structural and electrical evolution of graphene by oxygen plasma-induced disorder,” Nanotechnology IOP 20(375703): 1-8 (Aug. 26, 2009).
Koh et al., “Sensitive NMR Sensors Detect Antibodies to Influenza,” NIH PA Author Manuscript PMC (Apr. 2009), also published in Angew. Chem. Int'l. Ed. Engl, 47(22): 4119-4121 (May 2008) (available online Apr. 2008).
Koski and Cui, “The New Skinny in Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials”, ACS Nano 7(5): 3739-3743 (May 16, 2013).
Kurapati et al., “Graphene oxide based multilayer capsules with unique permeability properties: facile encapsulation of multiple drugs,” Chemical Communication 48: 6013-6015 (Apr. 25, 2012).
Lehtinen et al., “Cutting and controlled modification of graphene with ion beams,” Nanotechnology, 22: 175306 (8 pages) (Mar. 2011).
Li et al., “3D graphene oxide-polymer hydrogel: near-infrared light-triggered active scaffold for reversible cell capture and on-demand release,” Advanced Materials 25: 6737-6743 (Oct. 7, 2013).
Liu et al., “Atomically Thin Molybdenum Disulfide Nanopores with High Sensitivity for DNA Translocation,” ACS Nano 8(3): 2504-2511 (Feb. 18, 2014).
Liu et al., “Graphene Oxidation: Thickness-Dependent Etching and Strong Chemical Doping,” Nano Letters 8(7): 1965-1970 (Jun. 19, 2008).
Marquardt et al., “Hybrid materials of platinum nanoparticles and thiol-functionalized graphene derivatives,” Carbon 66: 285-294 (Jan. 2014; first published online Sep. 12, 2013).
Matteucci et al., “Chapter 1: Transport of gases and Vapors in Glass and Rubbery Polymers,” in Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation (Yampolskii et al eds. 2006) (available online Jun. 2006).
Mishra et al., “Functionalized Graphene Sheets for Arsenic Removal and Desalination of Sea Water,” Desalination 282: 39-45 (Nov. 1, 2011).
Morse, “Scalable Synthesis of Semiconducting Nanopatterned Graphene Materials,” InterNano Resources for Nanomanufacturing (undated). Retrieved Jun. 2, 2016 from: http://www.internano.org/node/345.
Nair et al., “Unimpeded Permeation of Water Through Helium-Leak-tight Graphene-Based Membranes,” Science 335: 442-444 (Jan. 27, 2012).
Nam et al., “Monodispersed PtCo nanoparticles on hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide treated graphene as an effective oxygen reduction reaction catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cells,” Carbon 50: 3739-3747 (Aug. 2012) (available online Apr. 2012).
Nandamuri et al., “Chemical vapor deposition of graphene films,” Nanotechnology 21(14): 1-4 (Mar. 10, 2010).
Nayini et al., “Synthesis and characterization of functionalized carbon nanotubes with different wetting behaviors and their influence on the wetting properties of carbon nanotubes/polymethylmethacrylate coatings,” Progress in Organic Coatings, 77(6): 1007-1014 (Jun. 2014) (available online Mar. 2014).
O'Hern et al. “Selective Molecular Transport through Intrinsic Defects in a Single Layer of CVD Graphene,” ACS Nano, 6(11): 10130-10138 (Oct. 2, 2012).
O'Hern et al., “Selective Ionic Transport through Tunable Subnanometer Pores in Single-Layer Graphene Membranes,” Nano Letters 14(3): 1234-1241 (Feb. 3, 2014).
O'Hern, “Development of process to transfer large areas of LPCVD graphene from copper foil to a porous support substrate,” 1-62 (M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (Sep. 2011).
Paul, “Creating New Types of Carbon-Based Membranes,” Science 335: 413-414 (Jan. 27, 2012).
Plant et al., “Size-dependent propagation of Au nanoclusters through few-layer graphene,” Nanoscale, 6: 1258-1263 (2014) (available online Oct. 2013).
Popok. “Cluster Ion Implantation in Graphite and Diamond: Radiation Damage and Stopping of Cluster Constituents,” Reviews on Advanced Materials Science 38(1): 7-16 (2014).
Russo et al., “Atom-by-atom nucleation and growth of graphene nanopores,” PNAS, 109(16): 5953-5957 (Apr. 2012).
Schweicher et al., “Membranes to achieve immunoprotection of transplanted islets,” NIH-PA Author Manuscript, PMC, (Nov. 13, 2014), also published in Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark Ed) 19: 49-76 (Jan. 1, 2014).
Sint et al., “Selective Ion Passage through Functionalized Graphene Nanopores,” JACS 130: 16448-16449 (Nov. 14, 2008).
Suk et al., “Water Transport Through Ultrathin Graphene,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 1(10): 1590-1594 (Apr. 30, 2010).
Sun et al., “Growth of graphene from solid carbon sources,” Nature 468(7323): 549-552 (Nov. 25, 2010; including corrigendum in Nature 471(7336): 124 (Mar. 2011).
Tan et al., “Beta-cell regeneration and differentiation: how close are we to the ‘holy grail’?” J. Mol. Encodrinol. 53(3): R119-R129 (Dec. 1, 2014).
Tang et al., “Highly wrinkled cross-linked graphene oxide membranes for biological and charge-storage applications,” Small 8(3): 423-431 (Feb. 6, 2012; first published online Dec. 13, 2011).
Vlassiouk et al., “Versatile ultrathin nanoporous silicon nitride membranes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(50): 21039-21044 (Dec. 15, 2009).
Wadvalla, “Boosting agriculture through seawater,” Nature Middle East (Jul. 2, 2012). Retrieved Jun. 1, 2016 from: natureasia.com/en/nmiddleeast/article/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2012.92?WT.mc_id=FBK NatureMEast].
Wikipedia, “Ion track.” Jun. 1, 2016. Retrieved Jun. 1, 2016 from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ion_track.
Xu et al., “Graphene-like Two-Dimensional Materials”, Chemical Reviews 113: 3766-3798 (Jan. 3, 2013).
Zabihi et al., “Formation of nanopore in a suspended graphene sheet with argon cluster bombardment: A molecular dynamics simulation study,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 343: 48-51 (Jan. 2015) (available online Nov. 2014).
Zan et al., “Graphene Reknits Its Holes,” Nano Lett. 12(8): 3936-3940 (Jul. 5, 2012).
Zhao et al. “Two-Dimensional Material Membranes: An Emerging Platform for Controllable Mass Transport Applications,” Small 10(22): 4521-4542 (Sep. 10, 2014).
Zhao et al., “Drilling Nanopores in Graphene with Clusters: A Molecular Dynamics Study,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 116(21): 11776-1178 (2012) (available online May 2012).
Zhao et al., “Effect of Si02 substrate on the irradiation-assisted manipulation of supported graphene: a molecular dynamics study,” Nanotechnology, 23(28):1-8 (Jul. 2012) (available online Jun. 2012).
Anasori et al., “2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for energy storage”, Nature Reviews, vol. 2, Article No. 16098, Jan. 17, 2017, pp. 1-17.
Australian Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 2018200090 dated Apr. 30, 2019 (4 pages).
Huang et al., “Ultrathin Carbon Molecular Sieve Films and Room-Temperature Oxygen Functionalization for Gas-Sieving”, ACS Applied Maters & Interfaces 2019, vol. 11, Apr. 16, 2019, pp. 16729-16736.
Japanese Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 2016-566751 dated Jun. 7, 2019 (8 pages).
Mojtabavi et al., “Single-Molecule Sensing Using Nanopores in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Carbide (MXene) Membranes”, American Chemical Society, ACS Nano 2019, vol. 13, Mar. 7, 2019, pp. 3042-3053.
Neumann et al., “Bottom-Up Synthesis of Graphene Monolayers with Tunable Crystallinity and Porosity”, American Chemical Society, ACS Nano, May 21, 2019, pp. A-M (13 pages).
Pang et al., “Applications of 2D MXenes in energy conversion and storage systems”, Chemical Society Review, 2019, vol. 48, No. 1, Jun. 25, 2018, pp. 72-133.
U.S. Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,239 dated Jun. 21, 2019 (7 pages).
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,808 dated Jun. 26, 2019 (37 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/308,351 dated Jun. 3, 2019 (9 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/099,269 dated Jun. 6, 2019 (8 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Appl. Ser. No. 16833429.0 dated Aug. 9, 2019 (14 pages).
Farah et al., “Long-Term Implant Fibrosis Prevention in Rodents and Non-Human Primates Using Crystallized Drug Formulations”, Nature Materials, vol. 18, Aug. 2019, pp. 892-904.
Japanese Office Action for Appl. Ser. No. 2017-511982 dated Jul. 9, 2019 (6 pages).
Raimondo et al., “Functional muscle recovery with nanoparticle-directed M2 macrophage polarization in mice”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), Sep. 4, 2018, pp. 1-6.
University of Massachusetts Medical School, “Fibrosis Mitigation Pathway”, PowerPoint Presentation, date of presentation unknown (6 pages).
U.S. Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/589,135 dated Aug. 1, 2019 (11 pages).
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/410,457 dated Aug. 14, 2019 (8 pages).
Yang et al., “Large-area graphene-nanomesh/carbon-nanotube hybrid membranes for ionic and molecular nanofiltration”, Science, vol. 364, Jun. 14, 2019, pp. 1057-1062 (7 pages).
Zhang et al., “Rapid and Long-Term Glycemic Regulation with a Balanced Charged Immune-Evasive Hydrogel in T1DM Mice”, Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science News, Jan. 30, 2019, pp. 1-9.
Zhang et al., “Rapid and Long-Term Glycemic Regulation with a Balanced Charged Immune-Evasive Hydrogel in T1DM Mice”, Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science News, Jan. 30, 2019, Supporting Information (13 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150217219 A1 Aug 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61934537 Jan 2014 US