The following examples are illustrative of the principles of this invention. It is understood that this invention is not limited to any one specific embodiment exemplified herein.
HBr (357.20 g of 7.46 wt % aqueous solution; 0.33 mol HBr) and Na2MoO4 (2.04 g of 4 wt % aqueous solution; 0.4 mmol Na2MoO4) were added into a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask along with HCl (16.08 g of 12M HCl; 0.13 mol HCl) and H2O2 (2.84 g of 70 wt % aqueous solution; 0.06 mol H2O2). The mixture was stirred, cooled, and kept at 15-20° C. during addition at 10 mL/min into the reflux stream above a 12″×1″ column fitted with 24/40 glassware into a 500 mL three-necked round bottomed-flask into which live steam was injected. Excess condensate and HBr were removed by pump and the overhead products, comprising bromine and water, were condensed using a Friedrich's condenser cooled with aqueous glycol at 4-7° C. This condensate and any uncondensables were conveyed into 300 mL (15 wt %) Na2SO3 solution where the bromine was reduced into bromide ion and quantified by titration with 0.1N AgNO3. A total of 9.27 g bromine was obtained; a H2O2-based bromine yield of 99.04 wt %.
The procedure of Example 1 was used with HBr (356.77 g of 8.96 wt % aqueous solution; 0.40 mol HBr), HCl (11.40 g of 12M HCl; 0.09 mol HCl), Na2MoO4 (3.09 g of 4 wt % aqueous solution; 0.6 mmol Na2MoO4), and H2O2 (2.91 g of 70 wt % aqueous solution; 0.06 mol H2O2). A total of 8.99 g bromine was obtained; a H2O2-based bromine yield of 93.91 wt %.
The procedure of Example 1 was used with HBr (356.54 g of 7.52 wt % aqueous solution; 0.33 mol HBr), HCl (17.90 g of 12M HCl; 0.15 mol HCl), and H2O2 (2.80 g of 70 wt % aqueous solution; 0.06 mol H2O2). No catalyst according to this invention was added. A total of 7.32 g bromine was obtained; a H2O2-based bromine yield of 79.38 wt %.
The procedure of Example 1 was used with HBr (360.80 g of 6.19 wt % aqueous solution; 0.28 mol HBr), HCl (19.27 g of 12M HCl; 0.16 mol HCl), and H2O2(3.39 g of 70% wt aqueous solution; 0.07 mol H2O2) added into the feed HBr. No catalyst according to this invention was added. A total of 5.19 g bromine was obtained; a H2O2-based bromine yield of 46.43 wt.
The procedure of Example 1 was used with HBr (355.68 g of 7.46 wt % aqueous solution; 0.33 mol HBr), HCl (159.02 g of 30 wt % aqueous solution; 1.14 mol HCl), and H2O2 (2.65 g of 70 wt % aqueous solution; 0.06 mol H2O2). No catalyst according to this invention was added. A total of 8.30 g bromine was obtained; a H2O2-based bromine yield of 95.09 wt %.
The procedure of Example 1 was used with HBr (356.65 g of 17.20 wt % aqueous solution; 0.76 mol HBr), HCl (22.04 wt % by titration; 46.10 g (0.28 mol) HCl), and H2O2 (14.98 g of 70 wt % aqueous solution; 0.31 mol H2O2); in addition, a recycle acid source was used. No catalyst according to this invention was added. A total of 45.65 g bromine was obtained; a H2O2-based bromine yield of 92.50 wt %.
As can be see from these examples (data summarized in Table 1), use of a catalyst of this invention in a bromine oxidation reaction improves Br2 yield. Compare the oxidation reaction of Example 3, where 0.33 mol HBr were oxidized using 0.15 mol HCl and 0.06 mol H2O2, resulting in a H2O2-based Br2 yield of 79.38 wt %, to the reaction of Example 1, where 0.33 mol HBr were oxidized using 0.13 mol HCl 0.06 mol H2O2, and 0.4 mmol of a catalyst according to this invention (Na2MoO4), resulting in a H2O2-based Br2 yield of 99.04 wt % (vs. the 79.38 wt % yield of Example 3). Also compare Example 3 to Example 2, where slightly less HCl was used (0.09 mol vs. 0.15 mol), and 0.6 mmol of a catalyst according to this invention (Na2MoO4) was used, resulting in a H2O2-based Br2 yield of 93.91 wt % (vs. the 79.38 wt % yield of Example 3). The Examples also show that increased amounts of HCl cam improve the effectiveness in a bromine oxidation reaction. For example, comparing Example 3 to Example 5, increasing HCl from 0.15 mol to 1.14 mols can result in increased oxidant-based bromine (Br2) yield from 79.38 wt % to 95.09 wt %.
While the present invention has been described in terms of one or more preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that other modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the claims below.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/840,196 filed Aug. 25, 2006, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60840196 | Aug 2006 | US |