Processing of α+β titanium alloys

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9255316
  • Patent Number
    9,255,316
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 19, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 9, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
Processes for forming an article from an α+β titanium alloy are disclosed. The α+β titanium alloy includes, in weight percentages, from 2.90 to 5.00 aluminum, from 2.00 to 3.00 vanadium, from 0.40 to 2.00 iron, and from 0.10 to 0.30 oxygen. The α+β titanium alloy is cold worked at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature to 500° F., and then aged at a temperature in the range of 700° F. to 1200° F.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure is directed to processes for producing high strength alpha/beta (α+β) titanium alloys and to products produced by the disclosed processes.


BACKGROUND

Titanium and titanium-based alloys are used in a variety of applications due to the relatively high strength, low density, and good corrosion resistance of these materials. For example, titanium and titanium-based alloys are used extensively in the aerospace industry because of the materials' high strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance. One groups of titanium alloys known to be widely used in a variety of applications are the alpha/beta (α+β) Ti-6Al-4V alloys, comprising a nominal composition of 6 percent aluminum, 4 percent vanadium, less than 0.20 percent oxygen, and titanium, by weight.


Ti-6Al-4V alloys are one of the most common titanium-based manufactured materials, estimated to account for over 50% of the total titanium-based materials market. Ti-6Al-4V alloys are used in a number of applications that benefit from the alloys' combination of high strength at low to moderate temperatures, light weight, and corrosion resistance. For example, Ti-6Al-4V alloys are used to produce aircraft engine components, aircraft structural components, fasteners, high-performance automotive components, components for medical devices, sports equipment, components for marine applications, and components for chemical processing equipment.


Ti-6Al-4V alloy mill products are generally used in either a mill annealed condition or in a solution treated and aged (STA) condition. Relatively lower strength Ti-6Al-4V alloy mill products may be provided in a mill-annealed condition. As used herein, the “mill-annealed condition” refers to the condition of a titanium alloy after a “mill-annealing” heat treatment in which a workpiece is annealed at an elevated temperature (e.g., 1200-1500° F./649-816° C.) for about 1-8 hours and cooled in still air. A mill-annealing heat treatment is performed after a workpiece is hot worked in the α+β phase field. Ti-6Al-4V alloys in a mill-annealed condition have a minimum specified ultimate tensile strength of 130 ksi (896 MPa) and a minimum specified yield strength of 120 ksi (827 MPa), at room temperature. See, for example, Aerospace Material Specifications (AMS) 4928 and 6931A, which are incorporated by reference herein.


To increase the strength of Ti-6Al-4V alloys, the materials are generally subjected to an STA heat treatment. STA heat treatments are generally performed after a workpiece is hot worked in the α+β phase field. STA refers to heat treating a workpiece at an elevated temperature below the β-transus temperature (e.g., 1725-1775° F./940-968° C.) for a relatively brief time-at-temperature (e.g., about 1 hour) and then rapidly quenching the workpiece with water or an equivalent medium. The quenched workpiece is aged at an elevated temperature (e.g., 900-1200° F./482-649° C.) for about 4-8 hours and cooled in still air. Ti-6Al-4V alloys in an STA condition have a minimum specified ultimate tensile strength of 150-165 ksi (1034-1138 MPa) and a minimum specified yield strength of 140-155 ksi (965-1069 MPa), at room temperature, depending on the diameter or thickness dimension of the STA-processed article. See, for example, AMS 4965 and AMS 6930A, which is incorporated by reference herein.


However, there are a number of limitations in using STA heat treatments to achieve high strength in Ti-6Al-4V alloys. For example, inherent physical properties of the material and the requirement for rapid quenching during STA processing limit the article sizes and dimensions that can achieve high strength, and may exhibit relatively large thermal stresses, internal stresses, warping, and dimensional distortion. This disclosure is directed to methods for processing certain α+β titanium alloys to provide mechanical properties that are comparable or superior to the properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloys in an STA condition, but that do not suffer from the limitations of STA processing.


SUMMARY

Embodiments disclosed herein are directed to processes for forming an article from an α+β titanium alloy. The processes comprise cold working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature to 500° F. (260° C.) and, after the cold working step, aging the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 700° F. to 1200° F. (371-649° C.). The α+β titanium alloy comprises, in weight percentages, from 2.90% to 5.00% aluminum, from 2.00% to 3.00% vanadium, from 0.40% to 2.00% iron, from 0.10% to 0.30% oxygen, incidental impurities, and titanium.


It is understood that the invention disclosed and described herein is not limited to the embodiments disclosed in this Summary.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The characteristics of various non-limiting embodiments disclosed and described herein may be better understood by reference to the accompanying figures, in which:



FIG. 1 is a graph of average ultimate tensile strength and average yield strength versus cold work quantified as percentage reductions in area (% RA) for cold drawn α+β titanium alloy bars in an as-drawn condition;



FIG. 2 is a graph of average ductility quantified as tensile elongation percentage for cold drawn α+β titanium alloy bars in an as-drawn condition;



FIG. 3 is a graph of ultimate tensile strength and yield strength versus elongation percentage for α+β titanium alloy bars after being cold worked and directly aged according to embodiments of the processes disclosed herein;



FIG. 4 is a graph of average ultimate tensile strength and average yield strength versus average elongation for α+β titanium alloy bars after being cold worked and directly aged according to embodiments of the processes disclosed herein;



FIG. 5 is a graph of average ultimate tensile strength and average yield strength versus aging temperature for α+β titanium alloy bars cold worked to 20% reductions in area and aged for 1 hour or 8 hours at temperature;



FIG. 6 is a graph of average ultimate tensile strength and average yield strength versus aging temperature for α+β titanium alloy bars cold worked to 30% reductions in area and aged for 1 hour or 8 hours at temperature;



FIG. 7 is a graph of average ultimate tensile strength and average yield strength versus aging temperature for α+β titanium alloy bars cold worked to 40% reductions in area and aged for 1 hour or 8 hours at temperature;



FIG. 8 is a graph of average elongation versus aging temperature for α+β titanium alloy bars cold worked to 20% reductions in area and aged for 1 hour or 8 hours at temperature;



FIG. 9 is a graph of average elongation versus aging temperature for α+β titanium alloy bars cold worked to 30% reductions in area and aged for 1 hour or 8 hours at temperature;



FIG. 10 is a graph of average elongation versus aging temperature for α+β titanium alloy bars cold worked to 40% reductions in area and aged for 1 hour or 8 hours at temperature;



FIG. 11 is a graph of average ultimate tensile strength and average yield strength versus aging time for α+β titanium alloy bars cold worked to 20% reductions in area and aged at 850° F. (454° C.) or 1100° F. (593° C.); and



FIG. 12 is a graph of average elongation versus aging time for α+β titanium alloy bars cold worked to 20% reductions in area and aged at 850° F. (454° C.) or 1100° F. (593° C.).





The reader will appreciate the foregoing details, as well as others, upon considering the following detailed description of various non-limiting embodiments according to the present disclosure. The reader may also comprehend additional details upon implementing or using embodiments described herein.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF NON-LIMITING EMBODIMENTS

It is to be understood that the descriptions of the disclosed embodiments have been simplified to illustrate only those features and characteristics that are relevant to a clear understanding of the disclosed embodiments, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, other features and characteristics. Persons having ordinary skill in the art, upon considering this description of the disclosed embodiments, will recognize that other features and characteristics may be desirable in a particular implementation or application of the disclosed embodiments. However, because such other features and characteristics may be readily ascertained and implemented by persons having ordinary skill in the art upon considering this description of the disclosed embodiments, and are, therefore, not necessary for a complete understanding of the disclosed embodiments, a description of such features, characteristics, and the like, is not provided herein. As such, it is to be understood that the description set forth herein is merely exemplary and illustrative of the disclosed embodiments and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention defined by the claims.


In the present disclosure, other than where otherwise indicated, all numerical parameters are to be understood as being prefaced and modified in all instances by the term “about”, in which the numerical parameters possess the inherent variability characteristic of the underlying measurement techniques used to determine the numerical value of the parameter. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter described in the present description should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.


Also, any numerical range recited herein is intended to include all sub-ranges subsumed within the recited range. For example, a range of “1 to 10” is intended to include all sub-ranges between (and including) the recited minimum value of 1 and the recited maximum value of 10, that is, having a minimum value equal to or greater than 1 and a maximum value equal to or less than 10. Any maximum numerical limitation recited herein is intended to include all lower numerical limitations subsumed therein and any minimum numerical limitation recited herein is intended to include all higher numerical limitations subsumed therein. Accordingly, Applicant reserves the right to amend the present disclosure, including the claims, to expressly recite any sub-range subsumed within the ranges expressly recited herein. All such ranges are intended to be inherently disclosed herein such that amending to expressly recite any such sub-ranges would comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §112, first paragraph, and 35 U.S.C. §132(a).


The grammatical articles “one”, “a”, “an”, and “the”, as used herein, are intended to include “at least one” or “one or more”, unless otherwise indicated. Thus, the articles are used herein to refer to one or more than one (i.e., to “at least one”) of the grammatical objects of the article. By way of example, “a component” means one or more components, and thus, possibly, more than one component is contemplated and may be employed or used in an implementation of the described embodiments.


Any patent, publication, or other disclosure material that is said to be incorporated by reference herein, is incorporated herein in its entirety unless otherwise indicated, but only to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material expressly set forth in this description. As such, and to the extent necessary, the express disclosure as set forth herein supersedes any conflicting material incorporated by reference herein. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein, but which conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein is only incorporated to the extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the existing disclosure material. Applicant reserves the right to amend the present disclosure to expressly recite any subject matter, or portion thereof, incorporated by reference herein.


The present disclosure includes descriptions of various embodiments. It is to be understood that the various embodiments described herein are exemplary, illustrative, and non-limiting. Thus, the present disclosure is not limited by the description of the various exemplary, illustrative, and non-limiting embodiments. Rather, the invention is defined by the claims, which may be amended to recite any features or characteristics expressly or inherently described in or otherwise expressly or inherently supported by the present disclosure. Further, Applicant reserves the right to amend the claims to affirmatively disclaim features or characteristics that may be present in the prior art. Therefore, any such amendments would comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §112, first paragraph, and 35 U.S.C. §132(a). The various embodiments disclosed and described herein can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of the features and characteristics as variously described herein.


The various embodiments disclosed herein are directed to thermomechanical processes for forming an article from an α+β titanium alloy having a different chemical composition than Ti-6Al-4V alloys. In various embodiments, the α+β titanium alloy comprises, in weight percentages, from 2.90 to 5.00 aluminum, from 2.00 to 3.00 vanadium, from 0.40 to 2.00 iron, from 0.20 to 0.30 oxygen, incidental impurities, and titanium. These α+β titanium alloys (which are referred to herein as “Kosaka alloys”) are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,980,655 to Kosaka, which is incorporated by reference herein. The nominal commercial composition of Kosaka alloys includes, in weight percentages, 4.00 aluminum, 2.50 vanadium, 1.50 iron, 0.25 oxygen, incidental impurities, and titanium, and may be referred to as Ti-4Al-2.5V-1.5Fe-0.25O alloy.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,980,655 (“the '655 patent”) describes the use of α+β thermomechanical processing to form plates from Kosaka alloy ingots. Kosaka alloys were developed as a lower cost alternative to Ti-6Al-4V alloys for ballistic armor plate applications. The α+β thermomechanical processing described in the '655 patent includes:


(a) forming an ingot having a Kosaka alloy composition;


(b) β forging the ingot at a temperature above the β-transus temperature of the alloy (for example, at a temperature above 1900° F. (1038° C.)) to form an intermediate slab;


(c) α+β forging the intermediate slab at a temperature below the β-transus temperature of the alloy but in the α+β phase field, for example, at a temperature of 1500-1775° F. (815-968° C.);


(d) α+β rolling the slab to final plate thickness at a temperature below the β-transus temperature of the alloy but in the α+β phase field, for example, at a temperature of 1500-1775° F. (815-968° C.); and


(e) mill-annealing at a temperature of 1300-1500° F. (704-815° C.).


The plates formed according to the processes disclosed in the '655 patent exhibited ballistic properties comparable or superior to Ti-6Al-4V plates. However, the plates formed according to the processes disclosed in the '655 patent exhibited room temperature tensile strengths less than the high strengths achieved by Ti-6Al-4V alloys after STA processing.


Ti-6Al-4V alloys in an STA condition may exhibit an ultimate tensile strength of about 160-177 ksi (1103-1220 MPa) and a yield strength of about 150-164 ksi (1034-1131 MPa), at room temperature. However, because of certain physical properties of Ti-6Al-4V, such as relatively low thermal conductivity, the ultimate tensile strength and yield strength that can be achieved with Ti-6Al-4V alloys through STA processing is dependent on the size of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy article undergoing STA processing. In this regard, the relatively low thermal conductivity of Ti-6Al-4V alloys limits the diameter/thickness of articles that can be fully hardened/strengthened using STA processing because internal portions of large diameter or thick section alloy articles do not cool at a sufficient rate during quenching to form alpha-prime phase (α′-phase). In this manner, STA processing of large diameter or thick section Ti-6Al-4V alloys produces an article having a precipitation strengthened case surrounding a relatively weaker core without the same level of precipitation strengthening, which can significantly decrease the overall strength of the article. For example, the strength of Ti-6Al-4V alloy articles begins to decrease for articles having small dimensions (e.g., diameters or thicknesses) greater than about 0.5 inches (1.27 cm), and STA processing does not provide any benefit to of Ti-6Al-4V alloy articles having small dimensions greater than about 3 inches (7.62 cm).


The size dependency of the tensile strength of Ti-6Al-4V alloys in an STA condition is evident in the decreasing strength minimums corresponding to increasing article sizes for material specifications, such as AMS 6930A, in which the highest strength minimums for Ti-6Al-4V alloys in an STA condition correspond to articles having a diameter or thickness of less than 0.5 inches (1.27 cm). For example, AMS 6930A specifies a minimum ultimate tensile strength of 165 ksi (1138 MPa) and a minimum yield strength of 155 ksi (1069 MPa) for Ti-6Al-4V alloy articles in an STA condition and having a diameter or thickness of less than 0.5 inches (1.27 cm).


Further, STA processing may induce relatively large thermal and internal stresses and cause warping of titanium alloy articles during the quenching step. Notwithstanding its limitations, STA processing is the standard method to achieve high strength in Ti-6Al-4V alloys because Ti-6Al-4V alloys are not generally cold deformable and, therefore, cannot be effectively cold worked to increase strength. Without intending to be bound by theory, the lack of cold deformability/workability is generally believed to be attributable to a slip banding phenomenon in Ti-6Al-4V alloys.


The alpha phase (α-phase) of Ti-6Al-4V alloys precipitates coherent Ti3Al (alpha-two) particles. These coherent alpha-two (α2) precipitates increase the strength of the alloys, but because the coherent precipitates are sheared by moving dislocations during plastic deformation, the precipitates result in the formation of pronounced, planar slip bands within the microstructure of the alloys. Further, Ti-6Al-4V alloy crystals have been shown to form localized areas of short range order of aluminum and oxygen atoms, i.e., localized deviations from a homogeneous distribution of aluminum and oxygen atoms within the crystal structure. These localized areas of decreased entropy have been shown to promote the formation of pronounced, planar slip bands within the microstructure of Ti-6Al-4V alloys. The presence of these microstructural and thermodynamic features within Ti-6Al-4V alloys may cause the entanglement of slipping dislocations or otherwise prevent the dislocations from slipping during deformation. When this occurs, slip is localized to pronounced planar regions in the alloy referred to as slip bands. Slip bands cause a loss of ductility, crack nucleation, and crack propagation, which leads to failure of Ti-6Al-4V alloys during cold working.


Consequently, Ti-6Al-4V alloys are generally worked (e.g., forged, rolled, drawn, and the like) at elevated temperatures, generally above the α2 solvus temperature. Ti-6Al-4V alloys cannot be effectively cold worked to increase strength because of the high incidence of cracking (i.e., workpiece failure) during cold deformation. However, it was unexpectedly discovered that Kosaka alloys have a substantial degree of cold deformability/workability, as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0221929, which is incorporated by reference herein.


It has been determined that Kosaka alloys do not exhibit slip banding during cold working and, therefore, exhibit significantly less cracking during cold working than Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Not intending to be bound by theory, it is believed that the lack of slip banding in Kosaka alloys may be attributed to a minimization of aluminum and oxygen short range order. In addition, α2-phase stability is lower in Kosaka alloys relative to Ti-6Al-4V for example, as demonstrated by equilibrium models for the α2-phase solvus temperature (1305° F./707° C. for Ti-6Al-4V (max. 0.15 wt. % oxygen) and 1062° F./572° C. for Ti-4Al-2.5V-1.5Fe-0.25O, determined using Pandat software, CompuTherm LLC, Madison, Wis., USA). As a result, Kosaka alloys may be cold worked to achieve high strength and retain a workable level of ductility. In addition, it has been found that Kosaka alloys can be cold worked and aged to achieve enhanced strength and enhanced ductility over cold working alone. As such, Kosaka alloys can achieve strength and ductility comparable or superior to that of Ti-6Al-4V alloys in an STA condition, but without the need for, and limitations of, STA processing.


In general, “cold working” refers to working an alloy at a temperature below that at which the flow stress of the material is significantly diminished. As used herein in connection with the disclosed processes, “cold working”, “cold worked”, “cold forming”, and like terms, or “cold” used in connection with a particular working or forming technique, refer to working or the characteristics of having been worked, as the case may be, at a temperature no greater than about 500° F. (260° C.). Thus, for example, a drawing operation performed on a Kosaka alloy workpiece at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature to 500° F. (260° C.) is considered herein to be cold working. Also, the terms “working”, “forming”, and “deforming” are generally used interchangeably herein, as are the terms “workability”, “formability”, “deformability”, and like terms. It will be understood that the meaning applied to “cold working”, “cold worked”, “cold forming”, and like terms, in connection with the present application, is not intended to and does not limit the meaning of those terms in other contexts or in connection with other inventions.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may comprise cold working an α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature up to 500° F. (260° C.). After the cold working operation, the α+β titanium alloy may be aged at a temperature in the range of 700° F. to 1200° F. (371-649° C.).


When a mechanical operation, such as, for example, a cold draw pass, is described herein as being conducted, performed, or the like, at a specified temperature or within a specified temperature range, the mechanical operation is performed on a workpiece that is at the specified temperature or within the specified temperature range at the initiation of the mechanical operation. During the course of a mechanical operation, the temperature of a workpiece may vary from the initial temperature of the workpiece at the initiation of the mechanical operation. For example, the temperature of a workpiece may increase due to adiabatic heating or decease due to conductive, convective, and/or radiative cooling during a working operation. The magnitude and direction of the temperature variation from the initial temperature at the initiation of the mechanical operation may depend upon various parameters, such as, for example, the level of work performed on the workpiece, the stain rate at which working is performed, the initial temperature of the workpiece at the initiation of the mechanical operation, and the temperature of the surrounding environment.


When a thermal operation such as an aging heat treatment is described herein as being conducted at a specified temperature and for a specified period of time or within a specified temperature range and time range, the operation is performed for the specified time while maintaining the workpiece at temperature. The periods of time described herein for thermal operations such as aging heat treatments do not include heat-up and cool-down times, which may depend, for example, on the size and shape of the workpiece.


In various embodiments, an α+β titanium alloy may be cold worked at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature up to 500° F. (260° C.), or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, ambient temperature to 450° F. (232° C.), ambient temperature to 400° F. (204° C.), ambient temperature to 350° F. (177° C.), ambient temperature to 300° F. (149° C.), ambient temperature to 250° F. (121° C.), ambient temperature to 200° F. (93° C.), or ambient temperature to 150° F. (65° C.). In various embodiments, an α+β titanium alloy is cold worked at ambient temperature.


In various embodiments, the cold working of an α+β titanium alloy may be performing using forming techniques including, but not necessarily limited to, drawing, deep drawing, rolling, roll forming, forging, extruding, pilgering, rocking, flow-turning, shear-spinning, hydro-forming, bulge forming, swaging, impact extruding, explosive forming, rubber forming, back extrusion, piercing, spinning, stretch forming, press bending, electromagnetic forming, heading, coining, and combinations of any thereof. In terms of the processes disclosed herein, these forming techniques impart cold work to an α+β titanium alloy when performed at temperatures no greater than 500° F. (260° C.).


In various embodiments, an α+β titanium alloy may be cold worked to a 20% to 60% reduction in area. For instance, an α+β titanium alloy workpiece, such as, for example, an ingot, a billet, a bar, a rod, a tube, a slab, or a plate, may be plastically deformed, for example, in a cold drawing, cold rolling, cold extrusion, or cold forging operation, so that a cross-sectional area of the workpiece is reduced by a percentage in the range of 20% to 60%. For cylindrical workpieces, such as, for example, round ingots, billets, bars, rods, and tubes, the reduction in area is measured for the circular or annular cross-section of the workpiece, which is generally perpendicular to the direction of movement of the workpiece through a drawing die, an extruding die, or the like. Likewise, the reduction in area of rolled workpieces is measured for the cross-section of the workpiece that is generally perpendicular to the direction of movement of the workpiece through the rolls of a rolling apparatus or the like.


In various embodiments, an α+β titanium alloy may be cold worked to a 20% to 60% reduction in area, or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 30% to 60%, 40% to 60%, 50% to 60%, 20% to 50%, 20% to 40%, 20% to 30%, 30% to 50%, 30% to 40%, or 40% to 50%. An α+β titanium alloy may be cold worked to a 20% to 60% reduction in area with no observable edge cracking or other surface cracking. The cold working may be performed without any intermediate stress-relief annealing. In this manner, various embodiments of the processes disclosed herein can achieve reductions in area up to 60% without any intermediate stress-relief annealing between sequential cold working operations such as, for example, two or more passes through a cold drawing apparatus.


In various embodiments, a cold working operation may comprise at least two deformation cycles, wherein each deformation cycle comprises cold working an α+β titanium alloy to an at least 10% reduction in area. In various embodiments, a cold working operation may comprise at least two deformation cycles, wherein each deformation cycle comprises cold working an α+β titanium alloy to an at least 20% reduction in area. The at least two deformation cycles may achieve reductions in area up to 60% without any intermediate stress-relief annealing.


For example, in a cold drawing operation, a bar may be cold drawn in a first draw pass at ambient temperature to a greater than 20% reduction in area. The greater than 20% cold drawn bar may then be cold drawn in a second draw pass at ambient temperature to a second reduction in area of greater than 20%. The two cold draw passes may be performed without any intermediate stress-relief annealing between the two passes. In this manner, an α+β titanium alloy may be cold worked using at least two deformation cycles to achieve larger overall reductions in area. In a given implementation of a cold working operation, the forces required for cold deformation of an α+β titanium alloy will depend on parameters including, for example, the size and shape of the workpiece, the yield strength of the alloy material, the extent of deformation (e.g., reduction in area), and the particular cold working technique.


In various embodiments, after a cold working operation, a cold worked α+β titanium alloy may be aged at a temperature in the range of 700° F. to 1200° F. (371-649° C.), or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 800° F. to 1150° F., 850° F. to 1150° F., 800° F. to 1100° F., or 850° F. to 1100° F. (i.e., 427-621° C., 454-621° C., 427-593° C., or 454-593° C.). The aging heat treatment may be performed for a temperature and for a time sufficient to provide a specified combination of mechanical properties, such as, for example, a specified ultimate tensile strength, a specified yield strength, and/or a specified elongation. In various embodiments, an aging heat treatment may be performed for up to 50 hours at temperature, for example. In various embodiments, an aging heat treatment may be performed for 0.5 to 10 hours at temperature, or any sub-range therein, such as, for example 1 to 8 hours at temperature. The aging heat treatment may be performed in a temperature-controlled furnace, such as, for example, an open-air gas furnace.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may further comprise a hot working operation performed before the cold working operation. A hot working operation may be performed in the α+β phase field. For example, a hot working operation may be performed at a temperature in the range of 300° F. to 25° F. (167-15° C.) below the β-transus temperature of the α+β titanium alloy. Generally, Kosaka alloys have a β-transus temperature of about 1765° F. to 1800° F. (963-982° C.). In various embodiments, an α+β titanium alloy may be hot worked at a temperature in the range of 1500° F. to 1775° F. (815-968° C.), or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 1600° F. to 1775° F., 1600° F. to 1750° F., or 1600° F. to 1700° F. (i.e., 871-968° C., 871-954° C., or 871-927° C.).


In embodiments comprising a hot working operation before the cold working operation, the processes disclosed herein may further comprise an optional anneal or stress relief heat treatment between the hot working operation and the cold working operation. A hot worked α+β titanium alloy may be annealed at a temperature in the range of 1200° F. to 1500° F. (649-815° C.), or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 1200° F. to 1400° F. or 1250° F. to 1300° F. (i.e., 649-760° C. or 677-704° C.).


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may comprise an optional hot working operation performed in the β-phase field before a hot working operation performed in the α+β phase field. For example, a titanium alloy ingot may be hot worked in the β-phase field to form an intermediate article. The intermediate article may be hot worked in the α+β phase field to develop an α+β phase microstructure. After hot working, the intermediate article may be stress relief annealed and then cold worked at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature to 500° F. (260° C.). The cold worked article may be aged at a temperature in the range of 700° F. to 1200° F. (371-649° C.). Optional hot working in the β-phase field is performed at a temperature above the β-transus temperature of the alloy, for example, at a temperature in the range of 1800° F. to 2300° F. (982-1260° C.), or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 1900° F. to 2300° F. or 1900° F. to 2100° F. (i.e., 1038-1260° C. or 1038-1149° C.).


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be characterized by the formation of an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength in the range of 155 ksi to 200 ksi (1069-1379 MPa) and an elongation in the range of 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature. Also, in various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be characterized by the formation of an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength in the range of 160 ksi to 180 ksi (1103-1241 MPa) and an elongation in the range of 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature. Further, in various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be characterized by the formation of an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength in the range of 165 ksi to 180 ksi (1138-1241 MPa) and an elongation in the range of 8% to 17%, at ambient temperature.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be characterized by the formation of an α+β titanium alloy article having a yield strength in the range of 140 ksi to 165 ksi (965-1138 MPa) and an elongation in the range of 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature. In addition, in various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be characterized by the formation of an α+β titanium alloy article having a yield strength in the range of 155 ksi to 165 ksi (1069-1138 MPa) and an elongation in the range of 8% to 15%, at ambient temperature.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be characterized by the formation of an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength in any sub-range subsumed within 155 ksi to 200 ksi (1069-1379 MPa), a yield strength in any sub-range subsumed within 140 ksi to 165 ksi (965-1138 MPa), and an elongation in any sub-range subsumed within 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be characterized by the formation of an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength of greater than 155 ksi, a yield strength of greater than 140 ksi, and an elongation of greater than 8%, at ambient temperature. An α+β titanium alloy article forming according to various embodiments may have an ultimate tensile strength of greater than 166 ksi, greater than 175 ksi, greater than 185 ksi, or greater than 195 ksi, at ambient temperature. An α+β titanium alloy article forming according to various embodiments may have a yield strength of greater than 145 ksi, greater than 155 ksi, or greater than 160 ksi, at ambient temperature. An α+β titanium alloy article forming according to various embodiments may have an elongation of greater than 8%, greater than 10%, greater than 12%, greater than 14%, greater than 16%, or greater than 18%, at ambient temperature.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be characterized by the formation of an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength, a yield strength, and an elongation, at ambient temperature, that are at least as great as an ultimate tensile strength, a yield strength, and an elongation, at ambient temperature, of an otherwise identical article consisting of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy in a solution treated and aged (STA) condition.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be used to thermomechanically process α+β titanium alloys comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of, in weight percentages, from 2.90% to 5.00% aluminum, from 2.00% to 3.00% vanadium, from 0.40% to 2.00% iron, from 0.10% to 0.30% oxygen, incidental elements, and titanium.


The aluminum concentration in the α+β titanium alloys thermomechanically processed according to the processes disclosed herein may range from 2.90 to 5.00 weight percent, or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 3.00% to 5.00%, 3.50% to 4.50%, 3.70% to 4.30%, 3.75% to 4.25%, or 3.90% to 4.50%. The vanadium concentration in the α+β titanium alloys thermomechanically processed according to the processes disclosed herein may range from 2.00 to 3.00 weight percent, or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 2.20% to 3.00%, 2.20% to 2.80%, or 2.30% to 2.70%. The iron concentration in the α+β titanium alloys thermomechanically processed according to the processes disclosed herein may range from 0.40 to 2.00 weight percent, or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 0.50% to 2.00%, 1.00% to 2.00%, 1.20% to 1.80%, or 1.30% to 1.70%. The oxygen concentration in the α+β titanium alloys thermomechanically processed according to the processes disclosed herein may range from 0.10 to 0.30 weight percent, or any sub-range therein, such as, for example, 0.15% to 0.30%, 0.10% to 0.20%, 0.10% to 0.15%, 0.18% to 0.28%, 0.20% to 0.30%, 0.22% to 0.28%, 0.24% to 0.30%, or 0.23% to 0.27%.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be used to thermomechanically process an α+β titanium alloy comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of the nominal composition of 4.00 weight percent aluminum, 2.50 weight percent vanadium, 1.50 weight percent iron, and 0.25 weight percent oxygen, titanium, and incidental impurities (Ti-4Al-2.5V-1.5Fe-0.25O). An α+β titanium alloy having the nominal composition Ti-4Al-2.5V-1.5Fe-0.25O is commercially available as ATI 425® alloy from Allegheny Technologies Incorporated.


In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be used to thermomechanically process α+β titanium alloys comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of, titanium, aluminum, vanadium, iron, oxygen, incidental impurities, and less than 0.50 weight percent of any other intentional alloying elements. In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein may be used to thermomechanically process α+β titanium alloys comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of, titanium, aluminum, vanadium, iron, oxygen, and less than 0.50 weight percent of any other elements including intentional alloying elements and incidental impurities. In various embodiments, the maximum level of total elements (incidental impurities and/or intentional alloying additions) other than titanium, aluminum, vanadium, iron, and oxygen, may be 0.40 weight percent, 0.30 weight percent, 0.25 weight percent, 0.20 weight percent, or 0.10 weight percent.


In various embodiments, the α+β titanium alloys processed as described herein may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of a composition according to AMS 6946A, section 3.1, which is incorporated by reference herein, and which specifies the composition provided in Table 1 (percentages by weight).













TABLE 1







Element
Minimum
Maximum




















Aluminum
3.50
4.50



Vanadium
2.00
3.00



Iron
1.20
1.80



Oxygen
0.20
0.30



Carbon

0.08



Nitrogen

0.03



Hydrogen

0.015



Other elements (each)

0.10



Other elements (total)

0.30










Titanium
remainder










In various embodiments, α+β titanium alloys processed as described herein may include various elements other than titanium, aluminum, vanadium, iron, and oxygen. For example, such other elements, and their percentages by weight, may include, but are not necessarily limited to, one or more of the following: (a) chromium, 0.10% maximum, generally from 0.0001% to 0.05%, or up to about 0.03%; (b) nickel, 0.10% maximum, generally from 0.001% to 0.05%, or up to about 0.02%; (c) molybdenum, 0.10% maximum; (d) zirconium, 0.10% maximum; (e) tin, 0.10% maximum; (f) carbon, 0.10% maximum, generally from 0.005% to 0.03%, or up to about 0.01%; and/or (g) nitrogen, 0.10% maximum, generally from 0.001% to 0.02%, or up to about 0.01%.


The processes disclosed herein may be used to form articles such as, for example, billets, bars, rods, wires, tubes, pipes, slabs, plates, structural members, fasteners, rivets, and the like. In various embodiments, the processes disclosed herein produce articles having an ultimate tensile strength in the range of 155 ksi to 200 ksi (1069-1379 MPa), a yield strength in the range of 140 ksi to 165 ksi (965-1138 MPa), and an elongation in the range of 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature, and having a minimum dimension (e.g., diameter or thickness) of greater than 0.5 inch, greater than 1.0 inch, greater than 2.0 inches, greater than 3.0 inches, greater than 4.0 inches, greater than 5.0 inches, or greater than 10.0 inches (i.e., greater than 1.27 cm, 2.54 cm, 5.08 cm, 7.62 cm, 10.16 cm, 12.70 cm, or 24.50 cm).


Further, one of the various advantages of embodiments of the processes disclosed herein is that high strength α+β titanium alloy articles can be formed without a size limitation, which is an inherent limitation of STA processing. As a result, the processes disclosed herein can produce articles having an ultimate tensile strength of greater than 165 ksi (1138 MPa), a yield strength of greater than 155 ksi (1069 MPa), and an elongation of greater than 8%, at ambient temperature, with no inherent limitation on the maximum value of the small dimension (e.g., diameter or thickness) of the article. Therefore, the maximum size limitation is only driven by the size limitations of the cold working equipment used to perform cold working in accordance with the embodiments disclosed herein. In contrast, STA processing places an inherent limit on the maximum value of the small dimension of an article that can achieve high strength, e.g., a 0.5 inch (1.27 cm) maximum for Ti-6Al-4V articles exhibiting an at least 165 ksi (1138 MPa) ultimate tensile strength and an at least 155 ksi (1069 MPa) yield strength, at room temperature. See AMS 6930A.


In addition, the processes disclosed herein can produce α+β titanium alloy articles having high strength with low or zero thermal stresses and better dimensional tolerances than high strength articles produced using STA processing. Cold drawing and direct aging according to the processes disclosed herein do not impart problematic internal thermal stresses, do not cause warping of articles, and do not cause dimensional distortion of articles, which is known to occur with STA processing of α+β titanium alloy articles.


The process disclosed herein may also be used to form α+β titanium alloy articles having mechanical properties falling within a broad range depending on the level of cold work and the time/temperature of the aging treatment. In various embodiments, ultimate tensile strength may range from about 155 ksi to over 180 ksi (about 1069 MPa to over 1241 MPa), yield strength may range from about 140 ksi to about 163 ksi (965-1124 MPa), and elongation may range from about 8% to over 19%. Different mechanical properties can be achieved through different combinations of cold working and aging treatment. In various embodiments, higher levels of cold work (e.g., reductions) may correlate with higher strength and lower ductility, while higher aging temperatures may correlate with lower strength and higher ductility. In this manner, cold working and aging cycles may be specified in accordance with the embodiments disclosed herein to achieve controlled and reproducible levels of strength and ductility in α+β titanium alloy articles. This allows for the production of α+β titanium alloy articles having tailorable mechanical properties.


The illustrative and non-limiting examples that follow are intended to further describe various non-limiting embodiments without restricting the scope of the embodiments. Persons having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that variations of the Examples are possible within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims.


EXAMPLES
Example 1

5.0 inch diameter cylindrical billets of alloy from two different heats having an average chemical composition presented in Table 2 (exclusive of incidental impurities) were hot rolled in the α+β phase field at a temperature of 1600° F. (871° C.) to form 1.0 inch diameter round bars.
















TABLE 2





Heat
Al
V
Fe
O
N
C
Ti






















X
4.36
2.48
1.28
0.272
0.005
0.010
Balance


Y
4.10
2.31
1.62
0.187
0.004
0.007
Balance









The 1.0 inch round bars were annealed at a temperature of 1275° F. for one hour and air cooled to ambient temperature. The annealed bars were cold worked at ambient temperature using drawing operations to reduce the diameters of the bars. The amount of cold work performed on the bars during the cold draw operations was quantified as the percentage reductions in the circular cross-sectional area for the round bars during cold drawing. The cold work percentages achieved were 20%, 30%, or 40% reductions in area (RA). The drawing operations were performed using a single draw pass for 20% reductions in area and two draw passes for 30% and 40% reductions in area, with no intermediate annealing.


The ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS), and elongation (%) were measured at ambient temperature for each cold drawn bar (20%, 30%, and 40% RA) and for 1-inch diameter bars that were not cold drawn (0% RA). The averaged results are presented in Table 3 and FIGS. 1 and 2.













TABLE 3






Cold Draw
UTS
YS
Elongation


Heat
(% RA)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(%)



















X
0
144.7
132.1
18.1



20
176.3
156.0
9.5



30
183.5
168.4
8.2



40
188.2
166.2
7.7


Y
0
145.5
130.9
17.7



20
173.0
156.3
9.7



30
181.0
163.9
7.0



40
182.8
151.0
8.3









The ultimate tensile strength generally increased with increasing levels of cold work, while elongation generally decreased with increasing levels of cold work up to about 20-30% cold work. Alloys cold worked to 30% and 40% retained about 8% elongation with ultimate tensile strengths greater than 180 ksi and approaching 190 ksi. Alloys cold worked to 30% and 40% also exhibited yield strengths in the range of 150 ksi to 170 ksi.


Example 2

5-inch diameter cylindrical billets having the average chemical composition of Heat X presented in Table 1 (β-transus temperature of 1790° F.) were thermomechanically processed as described in Example 1 to form round bars having cold work percentages of 20%, 30%, or 40% reductions in area. After cold drawing, the bars were directly aged using one of the aging cycles presented in Table 4, followed by an air cool to ambient temperature.












TABLE 4







Aging
Aging Time



Temperature (° F.)
(hour)



















850
1.00



850
8.00



925
4.50



975
2.75



975
4.50



975
6.25



1100
1.00



1100
8.00










The ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation were measured at ambient temperature for each cold drawn and aged bar. The raw data are presented in FIG. 3 and the averaged data are presented in FIG. 4 and Table 5.
















TABLE 5







Cold
Aging
Aging






Draw
Temperature
Time
UTS
YS
Elongation



(% RA)
(° F.)
(hour)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(%)























20
850
1.00
170.4
156.2
14.0



30
850
1.00
174.6
158.5
13.5



40
850
1.00
180.6
162.7
12.9



20
850
8.00
168.7
153.4
13.7



30
850
8.00
175.2
158.5
12.6



40
850
8.00
179.5
161.0
11.5



20
925
4.50
163.4
148.0
15.2



30
925
4.50
168.8
152.3
14.0



40
925
4.50
174.5
156.5
13.7



20
975
2.75
161.7
146.4
14.8



30
975
2.75
167.4
155.8
15.5



40
975
2.75
173.0
155.1
13.0



20
975
4.50
160.9
145.5
14.4



30
975
4.50
169.3
149.9
13.2



40
975
4.50
174.4
153.9
12.9



20
975
6.25
163.5
144.9
14.7



30
975
6.25
172.7
150.3
12.9



40
975
6.25
171.0
153.4
12.9



20
1100
1.00
155.7
140.6
18.3



30
1100
1.00
163.0
146.5
15.2



40
1100
1.00
165.0
147.8
15.2



20
1100
8.00
156.8
141.8
18.0



30
1100
8.00
162.1
146.1
17.2



40
1100
8.00
162.1
145.7
17.8










The cold drawn and aged alloys exhibited a range of mechanical properties depending on the level of cold work and the time/temperature cycle of the aging treatment. Ultimate tensile strength ranged from about 155 ksi to over 180 ksi. Yield strength ranged from about 140 ksi to about 163 ksi. Elongation ranged from about 11% to over 19%. Accordingly, different mechanical properties can be achieved through different combinations of cold work level and aging treatment.


Higher levels of cold work generally correlated with higher strength and lower ductility. Higher aging temperatures generally correlated with lower strength. This is shown in FIGS. 5, 6, and 7, which are graphs of strength (average UTS and average YS) versus temperature for cold work percentages of 20%, 30%, and 40% reductions in area, respectively. Higher aging temperatures generally correlated with higher ductility. This is shown in FIGS. 8, 9, and 10, which are graphs of average elongation versus temperature for cold work percentages of 20%, 30%, and 40% reductions in area, respectively. The duration of the aging treatment does not appear to have a significant effect on mechanical properties as illustrated in FIGS. 11 and 12, which are graphs of strength and elongation, respectively, versus time for cold work percentage of 20% reduction in area.


Example 3

Cold drawn round bars having the chemical composition of Heat X presented in Table 1, diameters of 0.75 inches, and processed as described in Examples 1 and 2 to 40% reductions in area during a drawing operation were double shear tested according to NASM 1312-13 (Aerospace Industries Association, Feb. 1, 2003, incorporated by reference herein). Double shear testing provides an evaluation of the applicability of this combination of alloy chemistry and thermomechanical processing for the production of high strength fastener stock. A first set of round bars was tested in the as-drawn condition and a second set of round bars was tested after being aged at 850° F. for 1 hour and air cooled to ambient temperature (850/1/AC). The double shear strength results are presented in Table 6 along with average values for ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation. For comparative purposes, the minimum specified values for these mechanical properties for Ti-6Al-4V fastener stock are also presented in Table 6.















TABLE 6











Double




Cold



Shear




Draw


Elongation
Strength


Condition
Size
(% RA)
UTS (ksi)
YS (ksi)
(%)
(ksi)





















as-drawn
0.75
40
188.2
166.2
7.7
100.6








102


850/1/AC
0.75
40
180.6
162.7
12.9
103.2








102.4


Ti-6-4
0.75
N/A
165
155
10
102


Target









The cold drawn and aged alloys exhibited mechanical properties superior to the minimum specified values for Ti-6Al-4V fastener stock applications. As such, the processes disclosed herein may offer a more efficient alternative to the production of Ti-6Al-4V articles using STA processing.


Cold working and aging α+β titanium alloys comprising, in weight percentages, from 2.90 to 5.00 aluminum, from 2.00 to 3.00 vanadium, from 0.40 to 2.00 iron, from 0.10 to 0.30 oxygen, and titanium, according to the various embodiments disclosed herein, produces alloy articles having mechanical properties that exceed the minimum specified mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloys for various applications, including, for example, general aerospace applications and fastener applications. As noted above, Ti-6Al-4V alloys require STA processing to achieve the necessary strength required for critical applications, such as, for example, aerospace applications. As such, high strength Ti-6Al-4V alloys are limited by the size of the articles due to the inherent physical properties of the material and the requirement for rapid quenching during STA processing. In contrast, high strength cold worked and aged α+β titanium alloys, as described herein, are not limited in terms of article size and dimensions. Further, high strength cold worked and aged α+β titanium alloys, as described herein, do not experience large thermal and internal stresses or warping, which may be characteristic of thicker section Ti-6Al-4V alloy articles during STA processing.


This disclosure has been written with reference to various exemplary, illustrative, and non-limiting embodiments. However, it will be recognized by persons having ordinary skill in the art that various substitutions, modifications, or combinations of any of the disclosed embodiments (or portions thereof) may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, it is contemplated and understood that the present disclosure embraces additional embodiments not expressly set forth herein. Such embodiments may be obtained, for example, by combining, modifying, or reorganizing any of the disclosed steps, components, elements, features, aspects, characteristics, limitations, and the like, of the embodiments described herein. In this regard, Applicant reserves the right to amend the claims during prosecution to add features as variously described herein.

Claims
  • 1. A process for forming an article from an α+β titanium alloy comprising: cold working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature to 500° F.; anddirect aging the cold-worked α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 700° F. to 1200° F.;the α+β titanium alloy comprising, in weight percentages, from 2.90 to 5.00 aluminum, from 2.00 to 3.00 vanadium, from 0.40 to 2.00 iron, from 0.10 to 0.30 oxygen, titanium, and incidental impurities; andwherein the cold working and direct aging forms an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength in the range of 155 ksi to 200 ksi and an elongation in the range of 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature.
  • 2. The process of claim 1, wherein the cold working and aging forms an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength in the range of 165 ksi to 180 ksi and an elongation in the range of 8% to 17%, at ambient temperature.
  • 3. The process of claim 1, wherein the cold working and aging forms an α+β titanium alloy article having a yield strength in the range of 140 ksi to 165 ksi and an elongation in the range of 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature.
  • 4. The process of claim 1, wherein the cold working and aging forms an α+β titanium alloy article having a yield strength in the range of 155 ksi to 165 ksi and an elongation in the range of 8% to 15%, at ambient temperature.
  • 5. The process of claim 1, wherein the cold working and aging forms an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength, a yield strength, and an elongation, at ambient temperature, that are at least as great as an ultimate tensile strength, a yield strength, and an elongation, at ambient temperature, of an otherwise identical article consisting of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy in a solution treated and aged condition.
  • 6. The process of claim 1, comprising cold working the α+β titanium alloy to a 20% to 60% reduction in area.
  • 7. The process of claim 1, comprising cold working the α+β titanium alloy to a 20% to 40% reduction in area.
  • 8. The process of claim 1, wherein the cold working of the α+β titanium alloy comprises at least two deformation cycles, wherein each cycle comprises cold working the α+β titanium alloy to an at least 10% reduction in area.
  • 9. The process of claim 1, wherein the cold working of the α+β titanium alloy comprises at least two deformation cycles, wherein each cycle comprises cold working the α+β titanium alloy to an at least 20% reduction in area.
  • 10. The process of claim 1, comprising cold working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature to 400° F.
  • 11. The process of claim 1, comprising cold working the α+β titanium alloy at ambient temperature.
  • 12. The process of claim 1, comprising aging the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 800° F. to 1150° F. after the cold working.
  • 13. The process of claim 1, comprising aging the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 850° F. to 1100° F. after the cold working.
  • 14. The process of claim 1, comprising aging the α+β titanium alloy for up to 50 hours.
  • 15. The process of claim 14, comprising aging the α+β titanium alloy for 0.5 to 10 hours.
  • 16. The process of claim 1, further comprising hot working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 300° F. to 25° F. below the β-transus temperature of the α+β titanium alloy, wherein the hot working is performed before the cold working.
  • 17. The process of claim 16, further comprising annealing the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 1200° F. to 1500° F., wherein the annealing is performed between the hot working and the cold working.
  • 18. The process of claim 16, comprising hot working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 1500° F. to 1775° F.
  • 19. The process of claim 1, wherein the α+β titanium alloy consists of, in weight percentages, from 2.90 to 5.00 aluminum, from 2.00 to 3.00 vanadium, from 0.40 to 2.00 iron, from 0.10 to 0.30 oxygen, incidental impurities, and titanium.
  • 20. The process of claim 1, wherein the α+β titanium alloy consists essentially of, in weight percentages, from 3.50 to 4.50 aluminum, from 2.00 to 3.00 vanadium, from 1.00 to 2.00 iron, from 0.10 to 0.30 oxygen, and titanium.
  • 21. The process of claim 1, wherein the α+β titanium alloy consists essentially of, in weight percentages, from 3.70 to 4.30 aluminum, from 2.20 to 2.80 vanadium, from 1.20 to 1.80 iron, from 0.22 to 0.28 oxygen, and titanium.
  • 22. The process of claim 1, wherein cold working the α+β titanium alloy comprises cold working by at least one operation selected from the group consisting of rolling, forging, extruding, pilgering, rocking, and drawing.
  • 23. The process of claim 1, wherein cold working the α+β titanium alloy comprises cold drawing the α+β titanium alloy.
  • 24. A process for forming an article from an α+β titanium alloy comprising: hot working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 300° F. to 25° F. below the β-transus temperature of the α+β titanium alloy;annealing the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 1200° F. to 1500° F., wherein the annealing is performed after the hot working;cold working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature to 500° F., wherein the cold working is performed after the annealing; anddirect aging the cold worked α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 700° F. to 1200° F.;the α+β titanium alloy comprising, in weight percentages, from 2.90 to 5.00 aluminum, from 2.00 to 3.00 vanadium, from 0.40 to 2.00 iron, from 0.10 to 0.30 oxygen, titanium, and incidental impurities;wherein the cold working and direct aging forms an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength in the range of 155 ksi to 200 ksi and an elongation in the range of 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature.
  • 25. A process for forming an article from an α+β titanium alloy comprising: drawing an α+β titanium alloy bar at a temperature in the range of ambient temperature to 500° F. to reduce the cross-sectional area of the bar; anddirect aging the drawn α+β titanium alloy bar at a temperature in the range of 700° F. to 1200° F.;the α+β titanium alloy comprising, in weight percentages, from 2.90 to 5.00 aluminum, from 2.00 to 3.00 vanadium, from 0.40 to 2.00 iron, from 0.10 to 0.30 oxygen, titanium, and incidental impurities;wherein the drawing and direct aging forms an α+β titanium alloy article having an ultimate tensile strength in the range of 155 ksi to 200 ksi and an elongation in the range of 8% to 20%, at ambient temperature.
  • 26. The process of claim 24, comprising hot working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 1500° F. to 1775° F.
  • 27. The process of claim 25, further comprising forming the α+β titanium alloy bar by hot working the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 300° F. to 25° F. below the β-transus temperature of the α+β titanium alloy.
  • 28. The process of claim 27, further comprising annealing the α+β titanium alloy at a temperature in the range of 1200° F. to 1500° F., wherein the annealing is performed between the hot working and the drawing.
US Referenced Citations (200)
Number Name Date Kind
2857269 Vordahl Oct 1958 A
2932886 Althouse Apr 1960 A
2974076 Vordahl Mar 1961 A
3015292 Bridwell Jan 1962 A
3025905 Haerr Mar 1962 A
3060564 Corral Oct 1962 A
3313138 Spring et al. Apr 1967 A
3379522 Vordahl Apr 1968 A
3489617 Wuerfel Jan 1970 A
3584487 Carlson Jun 1971 A
3605477 Carlson Sep 1971 A
3615378 Bomberger, Jr. et al. Oct 1971 A
3635068 Watmough et al. Jan 1972 A
3686041 Lee Aug 1972 A
3815395 Sass Jun 1974 A
3922899 Fremont et al. Dec 1975 A
3979815 Nakanose et al. Sep 1976 A
4053330 Henricks et al. Oct 1977 A
4067734 Curtis et al. Jan 1978 A
4094708 Hubbard et al. Jun 1978 A
4098623 Ibaraki et al. Jul 1978 A
4120187 Mullen Oct 1978 A
4147639 Lee et al. Apr 1979 A
4150279 Metcalfe et al. Apr 1979 A
4163380 Masoner Aug 1979 A
4197643 Burstone et al. Apr 1980 A
4229216 Paton et al. Oct 1980 A
4309226 Chen Jan 1982 A
4472207 Kinoshita et al. Sep 1984 A
4482398 Eylon et al. Nov 1984 A
4543132 Berczik et al. Sep 1985 A
4631092 Ruckle et al. Dec 1986 A
4639281 Sastry et al. Jan 1987 A
4668290 Wang et al. May 1987 A
4687290 Prussas Aug 1987 A
4688290 Hogg Aug 1987 A
4690716 Sabol et al. Sep 1987 A
4714468 Wang et al. Dec 1987 A
4799975 Ouchi et al. Jan 1989 A
4808249 Eyelon et al. Feb 1989 A
4842653 Wirth et al. Jun 1989 A
4851055 Eylon et al. Jul 1989 A
4854977 Alheritiere et al. Aug 1989 A
4857269 Wang et al. Aug 1989 A
4878966 Alheritiere et al. Nov 1989 A
4888973 Comley Dec 1989 A
4889170 Mae et al. Dec 1989 A
4919728 Kohl et al. Apr 1990 A
4943412 Bania et al. Jul 1990 A
4975125 Chakrabarti et al. Dec 1990 A
4980127 Parris et al. Dec 1990 A
5026520 Bhowal et al. Jun 1991 A
5032189 Eylon et al. Jul 1991 A
5041262 Gigliotti, Jr. Aug 1991 A
5074907 Amato et al. Dec 1991 A
5080727 Aihara et al. Jan 1992 A
5141566 Kitayama et al. Aug 1992 A
5156807 Nagata et al. Oct 1992 A
5162159 Tenhover et al. Nov 1992 A
5169597 Davidson et al. Dec 1992 A
5173134 Chakrabarti et al. Dec 1992 A
5201457 Kitayama et al. Apr 1993 A
5244517 Kimura et al. Sep 1993 A
5264055 Champin et al. Nov 1993 A
5277718 Paxson et al. Jan 1994 A
5310522 Culling May 1994 A
5332454 Meredith et al. Jul 1994 A
5332545 Love Jul 1994 A
5342458 Adams et al. Aug 1994 A
5358586 Schutz Oct 1994 A
5359872 Nashiki Nov 1994 A
5360496 Kuhlman et al. Nov 1994 A
5442847 Semiatin et al. Aug 1995 A
5472526 Gigliotti, Jr. Dec 1995 A
5494636 Dupoiron et al. Feb 1996 A
5509979 Kimura Apr 1996 A
5516375 Ogawa et al. May 1996 A
5520879 Saito et al. May 1996 A
5545262 Hardee et al. Aug 1996 A
5545268 Yashiki et al. Aug 1996 A
5558728 Kobayashi et al. Sep 1996 A
5580665 Taguchi et al. Dec 1996 A
5600989 Segal et al. Feb 1997 A
5649280 Blankenship et al. Jul 1997 A
5658403 Kimura Aug 1997 A
5662745 Takayama et al. Sep 1997 A
5679183 Takagi et al. Oct 1997 A
5698050 El-Soudani Dec 1997 A
5758420 Schmidt et al. Jun 1998 A
5759484 Kashii et al. Jun 1998 A
5795413 Gorman Aug 1998 A
5871595 Ahmed et al. Feb 1999 A
5896643 Tanaka Apr 1999 A
5897830 Abkowitz et al. Apr 1999 A
5954724 Davidson Sep 1999 A
5980655 Kosaka Nov 1999 A
6002118 Kawano et al. Dec 1999 A
6053993 Reichman et al. Apr 2000 A
6071360 Gillespie Jun 2000 A
6077369 Kusano et al. Jun 2000 A
6127044 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2000 A
6132526 Carisey et al. Oct 2000 A
6139659 Takahashi et al. Oct 2000 A
6143241 Hajaligol et al. Nov 2000 A
6187045 Fehring et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197129 Zhu et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200685 Davidson Mar 2001 B1
6209379 Nishida et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216508 Matsubara et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228189 Oyama et al. May 2001 B1
6250812 Ueda et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258182 Schetky et al. Jul 2001 B1
6284071 Suzuki et al. Sep 2001 B1
6332935 Gorman et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334350 Shin et al. Jan 2002 B1
6384388 Anderson et al. May 2002 B1
6387197 Bewlay et al. May 2002 B1
6391128 Ueda et al. May 2002 B2
6399215 Zhu et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402859 Ishii et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409852 Lin et al. Jun 2002 B1
6532786 Luttgeharm Mar 2003 B1
6536110 Smith et al. Mar 2003 B2
6539607 Fehring et al. Apr 2003 B1
6539765 Gates Apr 2003 B2
6558273 Kobayashi et al. May 2003 B2
6561002 Okada et al. May 2003 B2
6569270 Segal May 2003 B2
6632304 Oyama et al. Oct 2003 B2
6663501 Chen Dec 2003 B2
6726784 Oyama et al. Apr 2004 B2
6742239 Lee et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764647 Aigner et al. Jul 2004 B2
6773520 Fehring et al. Aug 2004 B1
6786985 Kosaka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800153 Ishii et al. Oct 2004 B2
6823705 Fukada et al. Nov 2004 B2
6908517 Segal et al. Jun 2005 B2
6918971 Fujii et al. Jul 2005 B2
6932877 Raymond et al. Aug 2005 B2
6971256 Okada et al. Dec 2005 B2
7032426 Durney et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037389 Barbier et al. May 2006 B2
7038426 Hall May 2006 B2
7096596 Hernandez, Jr. et al. Aug 2006 B2
7132021 Kuroda et al. Nov 2006 B2
7152449 Durney et al. Dec 2006 B2
7264682 Chandran Sep 2007 B2
7269986 Pfaffmann et al. Sep 2007 B2
7332043 Tetyukhin et al. Feb 2008 B2
7410610 Woodfield et al. Aug 2008 B2
7438849 Kuramoto et al. Oct 2008 B2
7449075 Woodfield et al. Nov 2008 B2
7536892 Amino et al. May 2009 B2
7559221 Horita et al. Jul 2009 B2
7611592 Davis et al. Nov 2009 B2
7837812 Marquardt et al. Nov 2010 B2
7879286 Miracle et al. Feb 2011 B2
7984635 Callebaut et al. Jul 2011 B2
8037730 Polen et al. Oct 2011 B2
8316687 Slattery Nov 2012 B2
8336359 Werz Dec 2012 B2
8408039 Cao et al. Apr 2013 B2
8499605 Bryan Aug 2013 B2
8578748 Huskamp et al. Nov 2013 B2
8613818 Forbes Jones et al. Dec 2013 B2
8652400 Forbes Jones et al. Feb 2014 B2
20030168138 Marquardt Sep 2003 A1
20040099350 Mantione et al. May 2004 A1
20040148997 Amino et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040221929 Hebda et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040250932 Briggs Dec 2004 A1
20050145310 Bewlay et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060243356 Oikawa et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070017273 Haug et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070193662 Jablokov et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070286761 Miracle et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080107559 Nishiyama et al. May 2008 A1
20080202189 Otaki Aug 2008 A1
20080210345 Tetyukhin et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080264932 Hirota Oct 2008 A1
20090183804 Zhao et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090234385 Cichocki et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100307647 Marquardt et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110038751 Marquardt et al. Feb 2011 A1
20120067100 Stefansson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120076611 Bryan Mar 2012 A1
20120076612 Bryan Mar 2012 A1
20120076686 Bryan Mar 2012 A1
20130062003 Shulkin et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130118653 Bryan et al. May 2013 A1
20130291616 Bryan Nov 2013 A1
20140060138 Hebda et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140076468 Marquardt et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140076471 Forbes Jones et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140116582 Forbes Jones et al. May 2014 A1
20140238552 Forbes Jones et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140255719 Forbes Jones et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140260492 Thomas et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140261922 Thomas et al. Sep 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (77)
Number Date Country
1070230 Mar 1993 CN
1194671 Sep 1998 CN
1403622 Mar 2003 CN
1816641 Aug 2006 CN
101104898 Jan 2008 CN
101637789 Jun 2011 CN
102212716 Oct 2011 CN
19743802 Mar 1999 DE
10128199 Dec 2002 DE
102010009185 Nov 2011 DE
0066361 Dec 1982 EP
0109350 May 1984 EP
0320820 Jun 1989 EP
0535817 Apr 1995 EP
0611831 Jan 1997 EP
0834580 Apr 1998 EP
0870845 Oct 1998 EP
0707085 Jan 1999 EP
0683242 May 1999 EP
0969109 Jan 2000 EP
1083243 Mar 2001 EP
1136582 Sep 2001 EP
1302554 Apr 2003 EP
1302555 Apr 2003 EP
1471158 Oct 2004 EP
1605073 Dec 2005 EP
1612289 Jan 2006 EP
1882752 Jan 2008 EP
2028435 Feb 2009 EP
2281908 Feb 2011 EP
1546429 Jun 2012 EP
847103 Sep 1960 GB
1170997 Nov 1969 GB
1433306 Apr 1976 GB
2151260 Jul 1985 GB
2337762 Dec 1999 GB
55-113865 Sep 1980 JP
57-62820 Apr 1982 JP
57-62846 Apr 1982 JP
60-046358 Mar 1985 JP
60-100655 Jun 1985 JP
62-109956 May 1987 JP
1-279736 Nov 1989 JP
2-205661 Aug 1990 JP
3-134124 Jun 1991 JP
4-74856 Mar 1992 JP
4-103737 Apr 1992 JP
5-59510 Mar 1993 JP
5-117791 May 1993 JP
5-195175 Aug 1993 JP
8-300044 Nov 1996 JP
9-194969 Jul 1997 JP
9-215786 Aug 1997 JP
H10-306335 Nov 1998 JP
11-343528 Dec 1999 JP
11-343548 Dec 1999 JP
2000-153372 Jun 2000 JP
2003-55749 Feb 2003 JP
2003-74566 Mar 2003 JP
2003-334633 Nov 2003 JP
2009-299110 Dec 2009 JP
2009-299120 Dec 2009 JP
10-2005-0087765 Aug 2005 KR
2197555 Jul 2001 RU
2172359 Aug 2001 RU
534518 Jan 1977 SU
631234 Nov 1978 SU
1088397 Feb 1991 SU
WO 9817386 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9817836 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9822629 May 1998 WO
WO 0236847 May 2002 WO
WO 02090607 Nov 2002 WO
WO 2004101838 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2008017257 Feb 2008 WO
WO 2012063504 May 2012 WO
WO 2012147742 Nov 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (235)
Entry
Gilbert et al., “Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Solution Treating and Aging”, ASM Handbook, 1991, ASM International, vol. 4, p. 1-8.
Beal et al., “Forming of Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Cold Forming”, ASM Handbook, 2006, ASM International, vol. 14B, p. 1-2.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620, filed Sep. 20, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/845,122, filed Jul. 28, 2010.
Cain, Patrick, “Warm forming aluminum magnesium components; How it can optimize formability, reduce springback”, Aug. 1, 2009, from http://www.thefabricator.com/article/presstechnology/warm-forming-aluminum-magnesium-components, 3 pages.
Tebbe, Patrick A. and Ghassan T. Kridli, “Warm forming aluminum alloys: an overview and future directions”, Int. J. Materials and Product Technology, vol. 21, Nos. 1-3, 2004, pp. 24-40.
Duflou et al., “A method for force reduction in heavy duty bending”, Int. J. Materials and Product Technology, vol. 32, No. 4, 2008, pp. 460-475.
Imatani et al., “Experiment and simulation for thick-plate bending by high frequency inductor”, ACTA Metallurgica Sinica, vol. 11, No. 6, Dec. 1998, pp. 449-455.
Rudnev et al., “Longitudinal flux indication heating of slabs, bars and strips is no longer “Black Magic:” II”, Industrial Heating, Feb. 1995, pp. 46-48 and 50-51.
Nguyen et al., “Analysis of bending deformation in triangle heating of steel plates with induction heating process using laminated plate theory”, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 37, 2009, pp. 228-246.
Lee et al., “An electromagnetic and thermo-mechanical analysis of high frequency induction heating for steel plate bending”, Key Engineering Materials, vols. 326-328, 2006, pp. 1283-1286.
Kovtun, et al., “Method of calculating induction heating of steel sheets during thermomechanical bending”, Kiev, Nikolaev, translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 5, pp. 105-110, May 1978, original article submitted Nov. 27, 1977, pp. 600-606.
ATI 425®-MIL Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, May 28, 2010, pp. 1-5.
ATI 425® Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, May 28, 2010, pp. 1-5.
ATI 500-MIL™, Mission Critical Metallics®, High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 4, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-4.
ATI 600-MIL®, Preliminary Draft Data Sheet, Ultra High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 4, Aug. 10, 2010, pp. 1-3.
ATI 600-MIL™, Preliminary Draft Data Sheet, Ultra High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 3, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-3.
ATI Ti-I 5Mo Beta Titanium Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Mar. 21, 2008, pp. 1-3.
ATI Titanium 6Al—2Sn—4Zr—2Mo Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Sep. 17, 2010, pp. 1-3.
ATI Aerospace Materials Development, Mission Critical Metallics, Apr. 30, 2008, 17 pages.
Shahan et al., “Adiabatic shear bands in titanium and titanium alloys: a critical review”, Materials & Design, vol. 14, No. 4, 1993, pp. 243-250.
Zhang et al., “Simulation of slip band evolution in duplex Ti—6Al—4V”, Acta Materialia, vol. 58, 2010, pp. 1087-1096.
ATI 425®-MIL Titanium Alloy, Mission Critical Metallics®, Version 3, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-4.
ATI Wah Chang, Titanium and Titanium Alloys, Technical Data Sheet, 2003, pp. 1-16.
ATI Wah Chang, ATI™ 425 Titanium Alloy (Ti—4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe-0.2502), Technical Data Sheet, 2004, pp. 1-5.
ATI Titanium 6Al—4V Alloy, Mission Critical Metallicst®, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Apr. 22, 2010, pp. 1-3.
SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy Bars, Forgings and Forging Stock, 6.0Al—4.0V, Solution Heat Treated and Aged, AMS 6930A, Issued Jan. 2004, Revised Feb. 2006, pp. 1-9.
SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy Bars, Forgings and Forging Stock, 6.0Al—4.0V Annealed, AMS 6931A, Issued Jan. 2004, Revised Feb. 2007, pp. 1-7.
SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate, 4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe, Annealed, AMS 6946A, Issued Oct. 2006, Revised Jun. 2007, pp. 1-7.
Military Standard, Fastener Test Methods, Method 13, Double Shear Test, MIL-STD-1312-13, Jul. 26, 1985, superseding MIL-STD-1312 (in part) May 31, 1967, 8 pages.
Military Standard, Fastener Test Methods, Method 13, Double Shear Test, MIL-STD-1312-13A, Aug. 23, 1991, superseding MIL-STD-13A, Jul. 26, 1985, 10 pages.
Nishimura, T. “Ti—15Mo—5Zr—3Al”, Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, eds. R. Boyer et al., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994, p. 949.
Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 27, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/746,189.
Office Action mailed Nov. 16, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789.
Advisory Action mailed Oct. 7, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,046, filed Sep. 12, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,143, filed Sep. 12, 2011.
Veeck, S., et al., “The Castability of Ti-5553 Alloy,” Advanced Materials and Processes, Oct. 2004, pp. 47-49.
Murray JL, et al., Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, Second Edition, vol. 1, Ed. Massalski, Materials Park, OH; ASM International; 1990, p. 547.
Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, Eds. Boyer et al, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994, pp. 524-525.
Tamirisakandala et al., “Powder Metallurgy Ti—6Al—4V—xB Alloys: Processing, Microstructure, and Properties”, JOM, May 2004, pp. 60-63.
Tamirisakandala et al., “Effect of boron on the beta transus of Ti—6Al—4V alloy”, Scripta Materialia, 53, 2005, pp. 217-222.
Nutt, Michael J. et al., “The Application of Ti-15 Beta Titanium Alloy in High Strength Structural Orthopaedic Applications,”Program and Abstracts for the Symposium on Titanium Niobium, Zirconium, and Tantalum for Medical and Surgical Applications, Washington, D.C., (Nov. 9-10, 2004) Abstract, p. 12.
Marquardt, Brian, “Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy Processed for High Strength Orthopaedic Applications,” Program and Abstracts for the Symposium on Titanium, Niobium, Zirconium, and Tantalum for Medical and Surgical Applications, Washington, D.C., (Nov. 9-10, 2004) Abstract, p. 11.
Marquardt, Brian, “Characterization of Ti—15Mo for Orthopaedic Applications,”TMS 2005 Annual Meeting: Technical Program, San Francisco, CA, (Feb. 13-17, 2005) Abstract, p. 239.
Qazi, J.I. et al., “High-Strength Metastable Beta-Titanium Alloys for Biomedical Applications,” JOM, (Nov. 2004) pp. 49-51.
Tokaji, Keiro et al., “The Microstructure Dependence of Fatigue Behavior in Ti—15Mo—5Zr—3Al Alloy,” Materials Science and Engineering A., vol. 213 (1996) pp. 86-92.
Allegheny Ludlum, “High Performance Metals for Industry, High Strength, High Temperature, and Corrosion-Resistant Alloys”, (2000) pp. 1-8.
Disegi, John, Wrought Titanium—15% Molybdenum Implant Material, Original Instruments and Implants of the Association for the Study of International Fixation- AO ASIF, Oct. (2003).
Naik, Uma M. et al., “Omega and Alpha Precipitation in Ti—15Mo Alloy,”Titanium '80 Science and Technology—Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Titanium, H. Kimura & O. Izumi Eds. (May 19-22, 1980) pp. 1335-1341.
Pennock, G.M. et al., “The Control of a Precipitation by Two Step Ageing in β Ti—15Mo,” Titanium '80 Science and Technology—Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Titanium, H. Kimura & O. Izumi Eds. (May 19-22, 1980) pp. 1344-1350.
Bowen, A. W., “On the Strengthening of a Metastable b-Titanium Alloy by w- and a-Precipitation” Royal Aircraft Establishment Technical Memorandum Mat 338, (1980) pp. 1-15 and Figs 1-5.
Bowen, A. W., “Omega Phase Embrittlement in Aged Ti—15%Mo,” Scripta Metallurgica, vol. 5, No. 8 (1971) pp. 709-715.
“ASTM Designation F2066-01 Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium—15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R58150),” ASTM International (2000) pp. 1-4.
Disegi, J. A., “Titanium Alloys for Fracture Fixation Implants,” Injury International Journal of the Care of the Injured, vol. 31 (2000) pp. S-D14-S-D17.
Ho, W.F. et al., “Structure and Properties of Cast Binary Ti—Mo Alloys” Biomaterials, vol. 20 (1999) pp. 2115-2122.
ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 39.
Allvac, Product Specification for “Allvac Ti—15 Mo,” available at http://www.allvac.com/allvac/pages/Titanium/Ti15MO.htm, last visited Jun. 9, 2003 p. 1 of 1.
Lemons, Jack et al., “Metallic Biomaterials for Surgical Implant Devices,” BONEZone, Fall (2002) p. 5-9 and Table.
“ASTM Designation F1801-97 Standard Practice for Corrosion Fatigue Testing of Metallic Implant Materials” ASTM International (1997) pp. 876-880.
Zardiackas, L.D. et al., “Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of Titanium Implant Materials,” Transactions of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, (2001).
Roach, M.D., et al., “Physical, Metallurgical, and Mechanical Comparison of a Low-Nickel Stainless Steel,” Transactions on the 27th Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Apr. 24-29, 2001, p. 343.
Roach, M.D., et al., “Stress Corrosion Cracking of a Low-Nickel Stainless Steel,” Transactions of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, 2001, p. 469.
ATI Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy Technical Data Sheet, ATI Allvac, Monroe, NC, Mar. 21, 2008, 3 pages.
Lütjering, G. and J.C. Williams, Titanium, Springer, New York (2nd ed. 2007) p. 24.
Murray, J.L., The Mn—Ti (Manganese—Titanium) System, Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams, vol. 2, No. 3 (1981) p. 334-343.
Semiatin, S.L. et al., “The Thermomechanical Processing of Alpha/Beta Titanium Alloys,” Journal of Metals, Jun. 1997, pp. 33-39.
Weiss, I. et al., “Thermomechanical Processing of Beta Titanium Alloys—An Overview,” Material Science and Engineering, A243, 1998, pp. 46-65.
Weiss, I. et al., “The Processing Window Concept of Beta Titanium Alloys”, Recrystallization '90, ed. by T. Chandra, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1990, pp. 609-616.
Froes, F.H. et al., “The Processing Window for Grain Size Control in Metastable Beta Titanium Alloys”, Beta Titanium Alloys in the 80's, ed. by R. Boyer and H. Rosenberg, AIME, 1984, pp. 161-164.
Myers, J., “Primary Working, A lesson from Titanium and its Alloys,” ASM Course Book 27 Lesson, Test 9, Aug. 1994, pp. 3-4.
Metals Handbook, Desk Edition, 2nd ed., J. R. Davis ed., ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio (1998), pp. 575-588.
Tamarisakandala, S. et al., “Strain-induced Porosity During Cogging of Extra-Low Interstitial Grade Ti—6Al—4V”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 10(2), Apr. 2001, pp. 125-130.
Prasad, Y.V.R.K. et al. “Hot Deformation Mechanism in Ti—6Al—4V with Transformed B Starting Microstructure: Commercial v. Extra Low Interstitial Grade”, Materials Science and Technology, Sep. 2000, vol. 16, pp. 1029-1036.
Russo, P.A., “Influence of Ni and Fe on the Creep of Beta Annealed Ti-6242S”, Titanium '95: Science and Technology, pp. 1075-1082, 1995.
Williams, J., Thermo-mechanical processing of high-performance Ti alloys: recent progress and future needs, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 117 (2001), p. 370-373.
Lutjering, G. and Williams, J.C., Titanium, Springer-Verlag, 2003, Ch. 5: Alpha+Beta Alloys, p. 177-201.
Boyer, Rodney R., “Introduction and Overview of Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Applications,” Metals Handbook, ASM Handbooks Online (2002).
Callister, Jr., William D., Materials Science and Engineering, An Introduction, Sixth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 180-184 (2003).
“Heat Treating of Nonferrous Alloys: Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys,” Metals Handbook, ASM Handbooks Online (2002).
Hawkins, M.J. et al., “Osseointegration of a New Beta Titanium Alloy as Compared to Standard Orthopaedic Implant Metals,” Sixth World Biomaterials Congress Transactions, Society for Biomaterials, 2000, p. 1083.
Jablokov et al., “Influence of Oxygen Content on the Mechanical Properties of Titanium—35Niobium—7Zirconium—5Tantalum Beta Titanium Alloy,” Journal of ASTM International, Sep. 2005, vol. 2, No. 8, 2002, pp. 1-12.
Fedotov, S.G. et al., “Effect of Aluminum and Oxygen on the Formation of Metastable Phases in Alloys of Titanium with .beta.-Stabilizing Elements”, Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Metally (1974) pp. 121-126.
Long, M. et al., “Friction and Surface Behavior of Selected Titanium Alloys During Reciprocating-Sliding Motion”, WEAR, 249(1-2), 158-168, 2001.
Takemoto Y et al., “Tensile Behavior and Cold Workability of Ti—Mo Alloys”, Materials Transactions Japan Inst. Metals Japan, vol. 45, No. 5, May 2004, pp. 1571-1576.
Lampman, S., “Wrought and Titanium Alloys,” ASM Handbooks Online, ASM International, 2002.
Roach, M.D., et al., “Comparison of the Corrosion Fatigue Characteristics of CPTi-Grade 4, Ti—6A1-4V ELI, Ti-6A1-7 Nb, and Ti—15 Mo”, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 2, Issue 7, (Jul./Aug. 2005) (published online Jun. 8, 2005).
Jablokov et al., “The Application of Ti—15 Mo Beta Titanium Alloy in High Strength Orthopaedic Applications”, Journal of ASTM International, vol. 2, Issue 8 (Sep. 2005) (published online Jun. 22, 2005).
Marquardt et al., “Beta Titanium Alloy Processed for High Strength Orthopaedic Applications,”Journal of ASTM International, vol. 2, Issue 9 (Oct. 2005) (published online Aug. 17, 2005).
SAE Aerospace Material Specification 4897A (issued Jan. 1997, revised Jan. 2003).
“Datasheet: Timetal 21S”, Alloy Digest, Advanced Materials and Processes (9/98), pp. 38-39.
“Stryker Orthopaedics TMZF® Alloy (UNS R58120)”, printed from www.allvac.com/allvac/pages/Titanium/UNSR58120.htm on Nov. 7, 2005.
ASTM Designation F 2066-01, “Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium—15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R58150)” 7 pages.
“Technical Data Sheet: Allvac® Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy” (dated Jun. 16, 2004).
“Allvac TiOsteum and TiOstalloy Beat Titanium Alloys”, printed from www.allvac.com/allvac/pages/Titanium/TiOsteum.htm on Nov. 7, 2005.
Donachie Jr., M.J., “Titanium A Technical Guide” 1988, ASM, pp. 39 and 46-50.
Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium—6Aluminum—4Vanadium Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56400), Designation: F 1472-99, ASTM 1999, pp. 1-4.
Two new α-β titanium alloys, KS Ti-9 for sheet and KS EL-F for forging, with mechanical properties comparable to Ti—6Al—4V, Oct. 8, 2002, ITA 2002 Conference in Orlando, Hideto Oyama, Titanium Technology Dept., Kobe Steel, Ltd., 16 pages.
Harper, Megan Lynn, “A Study of the Microstructural and Phase Evolutions in Timetal 555”, Jan. 2001, retrieved from http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/send-pdf.cgi/harper%20megan%20lynn.pdf?acc—num=osu1132165471 on Aug. 10, 2009, 92 pages.
Nyakana, et al., “Quick Reference Guide for β Titanium Alloys in the 00s”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 14, No. 6, Dec. 1, 2005, pp. 799-811.
SPS Titanium Titanium Fasteners, SPS Technologies Aerospace Fasteners, 2003, 4 pages.
Altemp® A286 Iron-Base Superalloy (UNS Designation S66286) Allegheny Ludlum Technical Data Sheet Blue Sheet, 1998, 8 pages.
Zeng et al., Evaluation of Newly Developed Ti-555 High Strength Titanium Fasteners, 17th AeroMat Conference & Exposition, May 18, 2006, 2 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952, filed Jan. 22, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189, filed May 7, 2007.
Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action mailed Jul. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598.
Office Action mailed Aug. 17, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598.
Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598.
Office Action mailed Sep. 6, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598.
Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160.
Office Action mailed Jan. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160.
Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 13, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160.
Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 20, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160.
Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action mailed Aug. 29, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action mailed Aug. 11, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Interview summary mailed Apr. 14, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Interview summary mailed Jun. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Interview summary mailed Jun. 15, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Interview summary mailed Jan. 6, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Office Action mailed Jan. 11, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789.
AL-6XN® Alloy (UNS N08367) Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, 2002, 56 pages.
ATI Datalloy 2 Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, ATI Allvac, Monroe, NC, SS-844, Version1, Sep. 17, 2010, 8 pages.
ATI 690 (UNS N06690) Nickel-Base, ATI Allvac, Oct. 5, 2010, 1 page.
Isothermal forging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis ed., Fifth Printing, Jan. 2006, ASM International, p. 238.
Isothermal forging, printed from http://thelibraryofmanufacturing.com/isothermal—forging.html, accessed Jun. 5, 2013, 3 pages.
Adiabatic definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis ed., Fifth Printing, Jan. 2006, ASM International, p. 9.
Adiabatic process—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, printed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic—process, accessed May 21, 2013, 10 pages.
ASTM Designation F 2066/F2066M-13, “Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium—15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R58150)”, Nov. 2013, 6 pages.
ATI 6-2-4-2™ Alloy Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Feb. 26, 2012, 4 pages.
ATI 6-2-4-6™ Titanium Alloy Data Sheet, accessed Jun. 26, 2012.
ATI 425, High-Strength Titanium Alloy, Alloy Digest, ASM International, Jul. 2004, 2 pages.
ATI 425® Alloy Applications, retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20100704044024/http://www.alleghenytechnologies.com/ATI425/applications/de fault.asp#other, Jul. 4, 2010, Way Back Machine, 2 pages.
ATI 425® Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20100703120218/http://www.alleghenytechnologies.com/ATI425/specifications/datasheet.asp, Jul. 3, 2010, Way Back Machine, 5 pages.
ATI 425® Titanium Alloy, Grade 38 Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Feb. 1, 2012, pp. 1-6.
Bewlay, et al., “Superplastic roll forming of Ti alloys”, Materials and Design, 21, 2000, pp. 287-295.
Boyko et al., “Modeling of the Open-Die and Radial Forging Processes for Alloy 718”, Superalloys 718, 625 and Various Derivatives: Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Metallurgy and Applications of Superalloys 718, 625 and Various Derivatives, held Jun. 23, 1992, pp. 107-124.
Desrayaud et al., “A novel high straining process for bulk materials—The development of a multipass forging system by compression along three axes”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 172, 2006, pp. 152-158.
DiDomizio, et al., “Evaluation of a Ni—20Cr Alloy Processed by Multi-axis Forging”, Materials Science Forum vols. 503-504, 2006, pp. 793-798.
Elements of Metallurgy and Engineering Alloys, Editor F. C. Campbell, ASM International, 2008, Chapter 8, p. 125.
Gigliotti et al., “Evaluation of Superplastically Roll Formed VT-25”, Titamium'99, Science and Technology, 2000, pp. 1581-1588.
Greenfield, Dan L., News Release, ATI Aerospace Presents Results of Year-Long Characterization Program for New ATI 425 Alloy Titanium Products at Aeromat 2010, Jun. 21, 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1 page.
Imayev et al., “Formation of submicrocrystalline structure in TiAl intermetallic compound”, Journal of Materials Science, 27, 1992, pp. 4465-4471.
Imayev et al., “Principles of Fabrication of Bulk Ultrafine-Grained and Nanostructured Materials by Multiple Isothermal Forging”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 638-642, 2010, pp. 1702-1707.
Marte et al., “Structure and Properties of Ni—20CR Produced by Severe Plastic Deformation”, Ultrafine Grained Materials IV, 2006, pp. 419-424.
Martinelli, Gianni and Roberto Peroni, “Isothermal forging of Ti-alloys for medical applications”, Presented at the 11th World Conference on Titanium, Kyoto, Japan, Jun. 4-7, 2007, accessed Jun. 5, 2013, 5 pages.
McDevitt, et al., Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of ATI 425 Alloy According to the Guidelines of the Metallic Materials Properties Development & Standardization Handbook, Aeromat 2010 Conference and Exposition: Jun. 20-24, 2010, Bellevue, WA, 23 pages.
Salishchev et al., “Characterization of Submicron-grained Ti—6Al—4V Sheets with Enhanced Superplastic Properties”, Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, vols. 447-448, 2004, pp. 441-446.
Salishchev et al., “Mechanical Properties of Ti—6Al—4V Titanium Alloy with Submicrocrystalline Structure Produced by Multiaxial Forging”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 584-586, 2008, pp. 783-788.
Salishchev, et al., “Effect of Deformation Conditions on Grain Size and Microstructure Homogeneity of β-Rich Titanium Alloys”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 14(6), Dec. 2005, pp. 709-716.
Salishchev, G.A., “Formation of submicrocrystalline structure in large size billets and sheets out of titanium alloys”, Institute for Metals Superplasticity Problems,Ufa, Russia, presented at 2003 NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Kyiv, Ukraine, Sep. 9-13, 2003, 50 pages.
Semiatin et al., “Equal Channel Angular Extrusion of Difficult-to-Work Alloys”, Materials & Design, Elsevier Science Ltd., 21, 2000, pp. 311-322.
Semiatin et al., “Alpha/Beta Heat Treatment of a Titanium Alloy with a Nonuniform Microstructure”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 38A, Apr. 2007, pp. 910-921.
Technical Presentation: Overview of MMPDS Characterization of ATI 425 Alloy, 2012, 1 page.
Timet 6-6-2 Titanium Alloy (Ti—6Al—6V—2Sn), Annealed, accessed Jun. 27, 2012.
Timet Timetal® 6-2-4-2 (Ti—6Al—2Sn—4Zr—2Mo—0.08Si) Titanium Alloy datasheet, accessed Jun. 26, 2012.
Timet Timetal® 6-2-4-6 Titanium Alloy (Ti—6Al—2Sn—4Zr—6Mo), Typical, accessed Jun. 26, 2012.
Zherebtsov et al., “Production of submicrocrystalline structure in large-scale Ti—6Al—4V billet by warm severe deformation processing”, Scripta Materialia, 51, 2004, pp. 1147-1151.
Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate 4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe, Annealed, AMS6946 Rev. B, Aug. 2010, SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, 7 pages.
Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate 6Al—4V, Annealed, AMS 4911L, Jun. 2007, SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, 7 pages.
E112-12 Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size, ASTM International, Jan. 2013, 27 pages.
ATI Datalloy 2 Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, ATI Properties, Inc., Version 1, Jan. 24, 2013, 6 pages.
ATI AL-6XN® Alloy (UNS N08367), ATI Allegheny Ludlum, 2010, 59 pages.
ATI 800™/ATI 800H™/ATI 800AT™ ATI Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloys (UNS N08800/N08810/N08811), 2012 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 9, 2012, 7 pages.
ATI 825™ Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N08825), 2013 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 2, Mar. 8, 2013, 5 pages.
ATI 625™ Alloy Technical Data Sheet, High Strength Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N06625), Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 4, 2012, 3 pages.
ATI 600™ Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N06600), 2012 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 19, 2012, 5 pages.
Office Action mailed Feb. 2, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Advisory Action mailed Jan. 25, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review mailed Mar. 28, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action mailed Sep. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Advisory Action mailed Nov. 29, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789.
Office Action mailed Nov. 14, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action mailed Jun. 13, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action mailed Nov. 19, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief mailed Jan. 30, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action mailed Nov. 14, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/888,699.
Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/845,122.
Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 17, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/845,122.
Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,046.
Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 31, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,046.
Office Action mailed Dec. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,143.
Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 2, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,143.
Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action mailed Mar. 25, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Office Action mailed Jan. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494.
Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494.
Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 5, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Jan. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066, filed Feb. 26, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,135, filed Dec. 20, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285, filed Mar. 11, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196, filed Mar. 15, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545, filed Mar. 15, 2013.
Office Action mailed Jan. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538.
Office Action mailed Feb. 8, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538.
Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538.
Office Action mailed Sep. 6, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222.
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222.
Notice of Allowance mailed May 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699, filed Nov. 12, 2013.
Beal et al., “Forming of Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Cold Forming”, ASM Handbook, 2006, ASM International, Revised by ASM Committee on Forming Titanium Alloys, vol. 14B, 2 pages.
Bar definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 32.
Billet definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 40.
Cogging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 79.
Open die press forging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) pp. 298 and 343.
Thermomechanical working definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 480.
Ductility definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 131.
Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Office Action mailed Nov. 28, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action mailed Jan. 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285.
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 24, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545.
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 6, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120012233 A1 Jan 2012 US