Processing routes for titanium and titanium alloys

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE TECHNOLOGY

Field of the Technology

The present disclosure is directed to forging methods for titanium and titanium alloys and to apparatus for conducting such methods.

Description of the Background of the Technology

Methods for producing titanium and titanium alloys having coarse grain (CG), fine grain (FG), very fine grain (VFG), or ultrafine grain (UFG) microstructure involve the use of multiple reheats and forging steps. Forging steps may include one or more upset forging steps in addition to draw forging on an open die press.

As used herein, when referring to titanium and titanium alloy microstructure: the term “coarse grain” refers to alpha grain sizes of 400 μm to greater than about 14 μm; the term “fine grain” refers to alpha grain sizes in the range of 14 μm to greater than 10 μm; the term “very fine grain” refers to alpha grain sizes of 10 μm to greater than 4.0 μm; and the term “ultra fine grain” refers to alpha grain sizes of 4.0 μm or less.

Known commercial methods of forging titanium and titanium alloys to produce coarse (CG) or fine grain (FG) microstructures employ strain rates of 0.03 s⁻¹to 0.10 s⁻¹using multiple reheats and forging steps.

Known methods intended for the manufacture of fine (FG), very fine (VFG) or ultra fine grain (UFG) microstructures apply a multi-axis forging (MAF) process at an ultra-slow strain rate of 0.001 s⁻¹or slower (see G. Salishchev, et. al., Materials Science Forum, Vol. 584-586, pp. 783-788 (2008)). The generic MAF process is described in C. Desrayaud, et. al, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 172, pp. 152-156 (2006).

The key to grain refinement in the ultra-slow strain rate MAF process is the ability to continually operate in a regime of dynamic recrystallization that is a result of the ultra-slow strain rates used, i.e., 0.001 s⁻¹or slower. During dynamic recrystallization, grains simultaneously nucleate, grow, and accumulate dislocations. The generation of dislocations within the newly nucleated grains continually reduces the driving force for grain growth, and grain nucleation is energetically favorable. The ultra-slow strain rate MAF process uses dynamic recrystallization to continually recrystallize grains during the forging process.

Relatively uniform cubes of UFG Ti-6-4 alloy can be produced using the ultra-slow strain rate MAF process, but the cumulative time taken to perform the MAF can be excessive in a commercial setting. In addition, conventional large scale, commercially available open die press forging equipment may not have the capability to achieve the ultra-slow strain rates required in such embodiments and, therefore, custom forging equipment may be required for production-scale ultra-slow strain rate MAF.

Accordingly, it would be advantageous to develop a process for producing titanium and titanium alloys having coarse, fine, very fine or ultrafine grain microstructure that does not require multiple reheats and/or accommodates higher strain rates, reduces the time necessary for processing, and eliminates the need for custom forging equipment.

SUMMARY

According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a method of refining the grain size of a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and a titanium alloy comprises heating the workpiece to a workpiece forging temperature within an alpha+beta phase field of the metallic. The workpiece is then multi-axis forged. Multi-axis forging comprises press forging the workpiece at the workpiece forging temperature in the direction of a first orthogonal axis of the workpiece with a strain rate sufficient to adiabatically heat an internal region of the workpiece. Forging in the direction of the first orthogonal axis is followed by allowing the adiabatically heated internal region of the workpiece to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, while heating an outer surface region of the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature. The workpiece is then press-forged at the workpiece forging temperature in the direction of a second orthogonal axis of the workpiece with a strain rate that is sufficient to adiabatically heat the internal region of the workpiece. Forging in the direction of the second orthogonal axis is followed by allowing the adiabatically heated internal region of the workpiece to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, while heating an outer surface region of the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature. The workpiece is then press-forged at the workpiece forging temperature in the direction of a third orthogonal axis of the workpiece with a strain rate that is sufficient to adiabatically heat the internal region of the workpiece. Forging in the direction of the third orthogonal axis is followed by allowing the adiabatically heated internal region of the workpiece to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, while heating an outer surface region of the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature. The press forging and allowing steps are repeated until a strain of at least 3.5 is achieved in at least a region of the titanium alloy workpiece. In a non-limiting embodiment, a strain rate used during press forging is in the range of 0.2 s⁻¹to 0.8 s⁻¹, inclusive.

According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of refining grain size of a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and titanium alloy comprises heating the workpiece to a workpiece forging temperature within an alpha+beta phase field of the metallic material. In non-limiting embodiments, the workpiece comprises a cylindrical-like shape and a starting cross-sectional dimension. The workpiece is upset forged at the workpiece forging temperature. After upsetting, the workpiece is multiple pass draw forged at the workpiece forging temperature. Multiple pass draw forging comprises incrementally rotating the workpiece in a rotational direction followed by draw forging the workpiece after each rotation. Incrementally rotating and draw forging the workpiece is repeated until the workpiece comprises substantially the same starting cross-sectional dimension of the workpiece. In a non-limiting embodiment, a strain rate used in upset forging and draw forging is the range of 0.001 s⁻¹to 0.02 s⁻¹, inclusive.

According to an additional aspect of the present disclosure, a method for isothermal multi-step forging of a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from a metal and a metal alloy comprises heating the workpiece to a workpiece forging temperature. The workpiece is forged at the workpiece forging temperature at a strain rate sufficient to adiabatically heat an internal region of the workpiece. The internal region of the workpiece is allowed to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, while an outer surface region of the workpiece is heated to the workpiece forging temperature. The steps of forging the workpiece and allowing the internal region of the workpiece to cool while heating the outer surface region of the metal alloy are repeated until a desired characteristic is obtained.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of apparatus and methods described herein may be better understood by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a flow chart listing steps of a non-limiting embodiment of a method according to the present disclosure for processing titanium and titanium alloys for grain size refinement;

FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a non-limiting embodiment of a high strain rate multi-axis forging method using thermal management for processing titanium and titanium alloys for the refinement of grain sizes, wherein FIGS. 2(a), 2(c), and 2(e) represent non-limiting press forging steps, and FIGS. 2(b), 2(d), and 2(f) represent non-limiting cooling and heating steps according to non-limiting aspects of this disclosure;

FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of a slow strain rate multi-axis forging technique known to be used to refine grains of small scale samples;

FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a temperature-time thermomechanical process chart for a non-limiting embodiment of a high strain rate multi-axis forging method according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of temperature-time thermomechanical process chart for a non-limiting embodiment of a multi-temperature high strain rate multi-axis forging method according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 6 is a schematic representation of temperature-time thermomechanical process chart for a non-limiting embodiment of a through beta transus high strain rate multi-axis forging method according the present disclosure;

FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of a non-limiting embodiment of a multiple upset and draw method for grain size refinement according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 8 is a flow chart listing steps of a non-limiting embodiment of a method according to the present disclosure for multiple upset and draw processing titanium and titanium alloys to refine grain size;

FIG. 9 is a temperature-time thermomechanical chart for the non-limiting embodiment of Example 1 of this disclosure;

FIG. 10 is a micrograph of the beta annealed material of Example 1 showing equiaxed grains with grain sizes between 10-30 μm;

FIG. 11 is a micrograph of a center region of the a-b-c forged sample of Example 1;

FIG. 12 a finite element modeling prediction of internal region cooling times according to a non-limiting embodiment of this disclosure;

FIG. 13 is a micrograph of the center of a cube after processing according to the embodiment of the non-limiting method described in Example 4;

FIG. 14 is a photograph of a cross-section of a cube processed according to Example 4;

FIG. 15 represents the results of finite element modeling to simulate deformation in thermally managed multi-axis forging of a cube processed according to Example 6;

FIG. 16(a) is a micrograph of a cross-section from the center of the sample processed according to Example 7; FIG. 16(b) is a cross-section from the near surface of the sample processed according to Example 7;

FIG. 17 is a schematic thermomechanical temperature-time chart of the process used in Example 9;

FIG. 18 is a macro-photograph of a cross-section of a sample processed according to the non-limiting embodiment of Example 9;

FIG. 19 is a micrograph of a sample processed according to the non-limiting embodiment of Example 9 showing the very fine grain size; and

FIG. 20 represents a finite element modeling simulation of deformation of the sample prepared in the non-limiting embodiment of Example 9.

The reader will appreciate the foregoing details, as well as others, upon considering the following detailed description of certain non-limiting embodiments according to the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN NON-LIMITING EMBODIMENTS

In the present description of non-limiting embodiments, other than in the operating examples or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities or characteristics are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about”. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, any numerical parameters set forth in the following description are approximations that may vary depending on the desired properties one seeks to obtain by way of the methods according to the present disclosure. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.

Any patent, publication, or other disclosure material, in whole or in part, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein is incorporated herein only to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth in this disclosure. As such, and to the extent necessary, the disclosure as set forth herein supersedes any conflicting material incorporated herein by reference. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein, but which conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein is only incorporated to the extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the existing disclosure material.

An aspect of this disclosure includes non-limiting embodiments of a multi-axis forging process that includes using high strain rates during the forging steps to refine grain size in titanium and titanium alloys. These method embodiments are generally referred to in this disclosure as “high strain rate multi-axis forging” or “high strain rate MAF”.

Referring now to the flow chart in FIG. 1 and the schematic representation in FIG. 2, in a non-limiting embodiment according to the present disclosure, a method 20 of using a high strain rate multi-axis forging (MAF) process for refining the grain size of titanium or titanium alloys is depicted. Multi-axis forging (26), also known as “a-b-c” forging, which is a form of severe plastic deformation, includes heating (step 22 in FIG. 1) a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and a titanium alloy 24 to a workpiece forging temperature within an alpha+beta phase field of the metallic material, followed by MAF 26 using a high strain rate.

As will be apparent from a consideration of the present disclosure, a high strain rate is used in high strain rate MAF to adiabatically heat an internal region of the workpiece. However, in a non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, in at least the last sequence of a-b-c hits of high strain rate MAF, the temperature of the internal region of the titanium or titanium alloy workpiece 24 should not exceed the beta-transus temperature (T_β) of the titanium or titanium alloy workpiece. Therefore, the workpiece forging temperature for at least the final a-b-c- sequence of high strain rate MAF hits should be chosen to ensure that the temperature of the internal region of the workpiece during high strain rate MAF does not equal or exceed the beta-transus temperature of the metallic material. In a non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, the internal region temperature of the workpiece does not exceed 20° F. (11.1° C.) below the beta transus temperature of the metallic material, i.e., T_β−20° F (T_β−11.1° C.), during at least the final high strain rate sequence of a-b-c MAF hits.

In a non-limiting embodiment of high strain rate MAF according to this disclosure, a workpiece forging temperature comprises a temperature within a workpiece forging temperature range. In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece forging temperature is in a workpiece forging temperature range of 100° F. (55.6° C.) below the beta transus temperature (T_β) of titanium or titanium alloy metallic material to 700° F. (388.9° C.) below the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material. In still another non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece forging temperature is in a temperature range of 300° F. (166.7° C.) below the beta transition temperature of titanium or the titanium alloy to 625° F. (347° C.) below the beta transition temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy. In a non-limiting embodiment, the low end of a workpiece forging temperature range is a temperature in the alpha+beta phase field wherein substantial damage does not occur to the surface of the workpiece during the forging hit, as would be known to a person having ordinary skill in the art.

In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece forging temperature range when applying the embodiment of the present disclosure of FIG. 1 to a Ti-6-4 alloy (Ti-6Al-4V; UNS No. R56400), which has a beta transus temperature (T_β) of about 1850° F. (1010° C.), may be from 1150° F. (621.1° C.) to 1750° F. (954.4° C.), or in another embodiment may be from 1225° F. (662.8° C.) to 1550° F. (843.3° C.).

In a non-limiting embodiment, prior to heating 22 the titanium or titanium alloy workpiece 24 to a workpiece forging temperature within the alpha+beta phase field, the workpiece 24 optionally is beta annealed and air cooled (not shown). Beta annealing comprises heating the workpiece 24 above the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material and holding for a time sufficient to form all beta phase in the workpiece. Beta annealing is a well know process and, therefore, is not described in further detail herein. A non-limiting embodiment of beta annealing may include heating the workpiece 24 to a beta soaking temperature of about 50° F. (27.8° C.) above the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy and holding the workpiece 24 at the temperature for about 1 hour.

Referring again to FIGS. 1 and 2, when the workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and a titanium alloy 24 is at the workpiece forging temperature, the workpiece is subjected to high strain rate MAF (26). In a non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, MAF 26 comprises press forging (step 28, and shown in FIG. 2(a)) the workpiece 24 at the workpiece forging temperature in the direction (A) of a first orthogonal axis 30 of the workpiece using a strain rate that is sufficient to adiabatically heat the workpiece, or at least adiabatically heat an internal region of the workpiece, and plastically deform the workpiece 24. In non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure, the phrase “internal region” as used herein refers to an internal region including a volume of about 20%, or about 30%, or about 40%, or about 50% of the volume of the cube.

High strain rates and fast ram speeds are used to adiabatically heat the internal region of the workpiece in non-limiting embodiments of high strain rate MAF according to this disclosure. In a non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, the term “high strain rate” refers to a strain rate range of about 0.2 s⁻¹to about 0.8 s⁻¹, inclusive. In another non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, the term “high strain rate” as used herein refers to a strain rate of about 0.2 s⁻¹to about 0.4 s⁻¹, inclusive.

In a non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, using a high strain rate as defined hereinabove, the internal region of the titanium or titanium alloy workpiece may be adiabatically heated to about 200° F. above the workpiece forging temperature. In another non-limiting embodiment, during press forging the internal region is adiabatically heated to about 100° F. (55.6° C.) to 300° F. (166.7° C.) above the workpiece forging temperature. In still another non-limiting embodiment, during press forging the internal region is adiabatically heated to about 150° F. (83.3° C.) to 250° F. (138.9° C.) above the workpiece forging temperature. As noted above, no portion of the workpiece should be heated above the beta-transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy during the last sequence of high strain rate a-b-c MAF hits.

In a non-limiting embodiment, during press forging (28) the workpiece 24 is plastically deformed to a 20% to 50% reduction in height or another dimension. In another non-limiting embodiment, during press forging (28) the titanium alloy workpiece 24 is plastically deformed to a 30% to 40% reduction in height or another dimension.

A known slow strain rate multi-axis forging process is depicted schematically in FIG. 3. Generally, an aspect of multi-axis forging is that after every three strokes or “hits” of the forging apparatus, such as an open die forge, the shape of the workpiece approaches that of the workpiece just prior to the first hit. For example, after a 5-inch sided cubic workpiece is initially forged with a first “hit” in the direction of the “a” axis, rotated 90° and forged with a second hit in the direction of the “b” axis, and rotated 90° and forged with a third hit in the direction of the “c” axis, the workpiece will resemble the starting cube with 5-inch sides.

In another non-limiting embodiment, a first press forging step 28, shown in FIG. 2(a), also referred to herein as the “first hit”, may include press forging the workpiece on a top face down to a predetermined spacer height while the workpiece is at a workpiece forging temperature. A predetermined spacer height of a non-limiting embodiment is, for example, 5 inches. Other spacer heights, such as, for example, less than 5 inches, about 3 inches, greater than 5 inches, or 5 inches up to 30 inches are within the scope of embodiments herein, but should not be considered as limiting the scope of the present disclosure. Larger spacer heights are only limited by the capabilities of the forge and, as will be seen herein, the capabilities of the thermal management system according to the present disclosure. Spacer heights of less than 3 inches are also within the scope of the embodiments disclosed herein, and such relatively small spacer heights are only limited by the desired characteristics of a finished product and, possibly, any prohibitive economics that may apply to employing the present method on workpieces having relatively small sizes. The use of spacers of about 30 inches, for example, provides the ability to prepare billet-sized 30-inch sided cubes with fine grain size, very fine grain size, or ultrafine grain size. Billet-sized cubic forms of conventional alloys have been employed in forging houses for manufacturing disk, ring, and case parts for aeronautical or land-based turbines.

After press forging 28 the workpiece 24 in the direction of the first orthogonal axis 30, i.e., in the A-direction shown in FIG. 2(a), a non-limiting embodiment of a method according to the present disclosure further comprises allowing (step 32) the temperature of the adiabatically heated internal region (not shown) of the workpiece to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, which is shown in FIG. 2(b). Internal region cooling times, or waiting times, may range, for example in non-limiting embodiments, from 5 seconds to 120 seconds, from 10 seconds to 60 seconds, or from 5 seconds to 5 minutes. It will be recognized by a person skilled in the art that internal region cooling times required to cool the internal region to the workpiece forging temperature will be dependent on the size, shape, and composition of the workpiece 24, as well as the conditions of the atmosphere surrounding the workpiece 24.

During the internal region cooling time period, an aspect of a thermal management system 33 according to non-limiting embodiments disclosed herein comprises heating (step 34) an outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 to a temperature at or near the workpiece forging temperature. In this manner, the temperature of the workpiece 24 is maintained in a uniform or near uniform and substantially isothermal condition at or near the workpiece forging temperature prior to each high strain rate MAF hit. In non-limiting embodiments, using the thermal management system 33 to heat the outer surface region 36, together with the allowing the adiabatically heated internal region to cool for a specified internal region cooling time, the temperature of the workpiece returns to a substantially uniform temperature at or near the workpiece forging temperature between each a-b-c forging hit. In another non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, using the thermal management system 33 to heat the outer surface region 36, together with allowing the adiabatically heated internal region to cool for a specified internal region cooling time, the temperature of the workpiece returns to a substantially uniform temperature within the workpiece forging temperature range between each a-b-c forging hit. By utilizing a thermal management system 33 to heat the outer surface region of the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature, together with allowing the adiabatically heated internal region to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, a non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure may be referred to as “thermally managed, high strain rate multi-axis forging” or for purposes herein, simply as “high strain rate multi-axis forging”.

In non-limiting embodiments according to this disclosure, the phrase “outer surface region” refers to a volume of about 50%, or about 60%, or about 70%, or about 80% of the cube, in the outer region of the cube

In a non-limiting embodiment, heating 34 an outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 may be accomplished using one or more outer surface heating mechanisms 38 of the thermal management system 33. Examples of possible outer surface heating mechanisms 38 include, but are not limited to, flame heaters for flame heating; induction heaters for induction heating; and radiant heaters for radiant heating of the workpiece 24. Other mechanisms and techniques for heating an outer surface region of the workpiece will be apparent to those having ordinary skill upon considering the present disclosure, and such mechanisms and techniques are within the scope of the present disclosure. A non-limiting embodiment of an outer surface region heating mechanism 38 may comprise a box furnace (not shown). A box furnace may be configured with various heating mechanisms to heat the outer surface region of the workpiece using one or more of flame heating mechanisms, radiant heating mechanisms, induction heating mechanisms, and/or any other suitable heating mechanism known now or hereafter to a person having ordinary skill in the art.

In another non-limiting embodiment, the temperature of the outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 may be heated 34 and maintained at or near the workpiece forging temperature and within the workpiece forging temperature range using one or more die heaters 40 of a thermal management system 33. Die heaters 40 may be used to maintain the dies 42 or the die press forging surfaces 44 of the dies at or near the workpiece forging temperature or at temperatures within the workpiece temperature forging range. In a non-limiting embodiment, the dies 42 of the thermal management system are heated to a temperature within a range that includes the workpiece forging temperature up to 100° F. (55.6° C.) below the workpiece forging temperature. Die heaters 40 may heat the dies 42 or the die press forging surface 44 by any suitable heating mechanism known now or hereinafter by a person skilled in the art, including, but not limited to, flame heating mechanisms, radiant heating mechanisms, conduction heating mechanisms, and/or induction heating mechanisms. In a non-limiting embodiment, a die heater 40 may be a component of a box furnace (not shown). While the thermal management system 33 is shown in place and being used during the cooling steps 32,52,60 of the multi-axis forging process 26 shown in FIGS. 2(b), (d), and (f), it is recognized that the thermal management system 33 may or may not be in place during the press forging steps 28,46,56 depicted in FIGS. 2(a), (c), and (e).

As shown in FIG. 2(c), an aspect of a non-limiting embodiment of a multi-axis forging method 26 according to the present disclosure comprises press forging (step 46) the workpiece 24 at the workpiece forging temperature in the direction (B) of a second orthogonal axis 48 of the workpiece 24 using a strain rate that is sufficient to adiabatically heat the workpiece 24, or at least an internal region of the workpiece, and plastically deform the workpiece 24. In a non-limiting embodiment, during press forging (46), the workpiece 24 is deformed to a plastic deformation of a 20% to 50% reduction in height or another dimension. In another non-limiting embodiment, during press forging (46) the workpiece 24 is plastically deformed to a plastic deformation of a 30% to 40% reduction in height or another dimension. In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece 24 may be press forged (46) in the direction of the second orthogonal axis 48 to the same spacer height used in the first press forging step (28). In another non-limiting embodiment according to the disclosure, the internal region (not shown) of the workpiece 24 is adiabatically heated during the press forging step (46) to the same temperature as in the first press forging step (28). In other non-limiting embodiments, the high strain rates used for press forging (46) are in the same strain rate ranges as disclosed for the first press forging step (28).

In a non-limiting embodiment, as shown by arrow 50 in FIGS. 2(b) and (d), the workpiece 24 may be rotated 50 to a different orthogonal axis between successive press forging steps (e.g., 28,46). This rotation may be referred to as “a-b-c” rotation. It is understood that by using different forge configurations, it may be possible to rotate the ram on the forge instead of rotating the workpiece 24, or a forge may be equipped with multi-axis rams so that rotation of neither the workpiece nor the forge is required. Obviously, the important aspect is the relative movement of the ram and the workpiece, and that rotating 50 the workpiece 24 may be an optional step. In most current industrial equipment set-ups, however, rotating 50 the workpiece to a different orthogonal axis in between press forging steps will be required to complete the multi-axis forging process 26.

In non-limiting embodiments in which a-b-c rotation 50 is required, the workpiece 24 may be rotated manually by a forge operator or by an automatic rotation system (not shown) to provide a-b-c rotation 50. An automatic a-b-c rotation system may include, but is not limited to including, free-swinging clamp-style manipulator tooling or the like to enable a non-limiting thermally managed high strain rate multi-axis forging embodiment disclosed herein.

After press forging 46 the workpiece 24 in the direction of the second orthogonal axis 48, i.e., in the B-direction, and as shown in FIG. 2(d), process 20 further comprises allowing (step 52) an adiabatically heated internal region (not shown) of the workpiece to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, which is shown in FIG. 2(d). Internal region cooling times, or waiting times, may range, for example, in non-limiting embodiments, from 5 seconds to 120 seconds, or from 10 seconds to 60 seconds, or 5 seconds up to 5 minutes, and it is recognized by a person skilled in the art that the minimum cooling times are dependent upon the size, shape, and composition of the workpiece 24, as well as the characteristics of the environment surrounding the workpiece.

During the internal region cooling time period, an aspect of a thermal management system 33 according to certain non-limiting embodiments disclosed herein comprises heating (step 54) an outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 to a temperature at or near the workpiece forging temperature. In this manner, the temperature of the workpiece 24 is maintained in a uniform or near uniform and substantially isothermal condition at or near the workpiece forging temperature prior to each high strain rate MAF hit. In non-limiting embodiments, when using the thermal management system 33 to heat the outer surface region 36, together with allowing the adiabatically heated internal region to cool for a specified internal region cooling time, the temperature of the workpiece returns to a substantially uniform temperature at or near the workpiece forging temperature between each a-b-c forging hits. In another non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, when using the thermal management system 33 to heat the outer surface region 36, together with allowing the adiabatically heated internal region to cool for a specified internal region cooling holding time, the temperature of the workpiece returns to a substantially uniform temperature within the workpiece forging temperature range prior to each high strain rate MAF hit.

In a non-limiting embodiment, heating 54 an outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 may be accomplished using one or more outer surface heating mechanisms 38 of the thermal management system 33. Examples of possible heating mechanisms 38 may include, but are not limited to, flame heaters for flame heating; induction heaters for induction heating; and/or radiant heaters for radiant heating of the workpiece 24. A non-limiting embodiment of a surface heating mechanism 38 may comprise a box furnace (not shown). Other mechanisms and techniques for heating an outer surface of the workpiece will be apparent to those having ordinary skill upon considering the present disclosure, and such mechanisms and techniques are within the scope of the present disclosure. A box furnace may be configured with various heating mechanisms to heat the outer surface of the workpiece one or more of flame heating mechanisms, radiant heating mechanisms, induction heating mechanisms, and/or any other heating mechanism known now or hereafter to a person having ordinary skill in the art.

In another non-limiting embodiment, the temperature of the outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 may be heated 54 and maintained at or near the workpiece forging temperature and within the workpiece forging temperature range using one or more die heaters 40 of a thermal management system 33. Die heaters 40 may be used to maintain the dies 42 or the die press forging surfaces 44 of the dies at or near the workpiece forging temperature or at temperatures within the temperature forging range. Die heaters 40 may heat the dies 42 or the die press forging surface 44 by any suitable heating mechanism known now or hereinafter by a person skilled in the art, including, but not limited to, flame heating mechanisms, radiant heating mechanisms, conduction heating mechanisms, and/or induction heating mechanisms. In a non-limiting embodiment, a die heater 40 may be a component of a box furnace (not shown). While the thermal management system 33 is shown in place and being used during the equilibration and cooling steps 32,52,60 of the multi-axis forging process 26 shown in FIGS, 2(b), (d), and (f), it is recognized that the thermal management system 33 may or may not be in place during the press forging steps 28,46,56 depicted in FIGS. 2(a), (c), and (e) .

As shown in FIG. 2(e), an aspect of an embodiment of multi-axis forging 26 according to this disclosure comprises press forging (step 56) the workpiece 24 at the workpiece forging temperature in the direction (C) of a third orthogonal axis 58 of the workpiece 24 using a ram speed and strain rate that are sufficient to adiabatically heat the workpiece 24, or at least adiabatically heat an internal region of the workpiece, and plastically deform the workpiece 24. In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece 24 is deformed during press forging 56 to a plastic deformation of a 20-50% reduction in height or another dimension. In another non-limiting embodiment, during press forging (56) the workpiece is plastically deformed to a plastic deformation of a 30% to 40% reduction in height or another dimension. In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece 24 may be press forged (56) in the direction of the third orthogonal axis 58 to the same spacer height used in the first press forging step (28). In another non-limiting embodiment according to the disclosure, the internal region (not shown) of the workpiece 24 is adiabatically heated during the press forging step (56) to the same temperatures as in the first press forging step (28). In other non-limiting embodiments, the high strain rates used for press forging (56) are in the same strain rate ranges as disclosed for the first press forging step (28).

In a non-limiting embodiment, as shown by arrow 50 in 2(b), 2(d), and 2(e) the workpiece 24 may be rotated 50 to a different orthogonal axis between successive press forging steps (e.g., 46,56). As discussed above, this rotation may be referred to as a-b-c rotation. It is understood that by using different forge configurations, it may be possible to rotate the ram on the forge instead of rotating the workpiece 24, or a forge may be equipped with multi-axis rams so that rotation of neither the workpiece nor the forge is required. Therefore, rotating 50 the workpiece 24 may be an optional step. In most current industrial set-ups, however, rotating 50 the workpiece to a different orthogonal axis in between press forging step will be required to complete the multi-axis forging process 26.

After press forging 56 the workpiece 24 in the direction of the third orthogonal axis 58, i.e., in the C-direction, and as shown in FIG. 2(e), process 20 further comprises allowing (step 60) an adiabatically heated internal region (not shown) of the workpiece to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, which is indicated in FIG. 2(f). Internal region cooling times may range, for example, from 5 seconds to 120 seconds, from 10 seconds to 60 seconds, or from 5 seconds up to 5 minutes, and it is recognized by a person skilled in the art that the cooling times are dependent upon the size, shape, and composition of the workpiece 24, as well as the characteristics of the environment surrounding the workpiece.

During the cooling period, an aspect of a thermal management system 33, according to non-limiting embodiments disclosed herein, comprises heating (step 62) an outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 to a temperature at or near the workpiece forging temperature. In this manner, the temperature of the workpiece 24 is maintained in a uniform or near uniform and substantially isothermal condition at or near the workpiece forging temperature prior to each high strain rate MAF hit. In non-limiting embodiments, using the thermal management system 33 to heat the outer surface region 36, together with allowing the adiabatically heated internal region to cool for a specified internal region cooling time, the temperature of the workpiece returns to a substantially uniform temperature at or near the workpiece forging temperature between each a-b-c forging hit. In another non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, using the thermal management system 33 to heat the outer surface region 36, together with allowing the adiabatically heated internal region to cool for a specified internal region cooling holding time, the temperature of the workpiece returns to a substantially isothermal condition within the workpiece forging temperature range between each a-b-c forging hit.

In a non-limiting embodiment, heating 62 an outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 may be accomplished using one or more outer surface heating mechanisms 38 of the thermal management system 33. Examples of possible heating mechanisms 38 may include, but are not limited to, flame heaters for flame heating; induction heaters for induction heating; and/or radiant heaters for radiant heating of the workpiece 24. Other mechanisms and techniques for heating an outer surface of the workpiece will be apparent to those having ordinary skill upon considering the present disclosure, and such mechanisms and techniques are within the scope of the present disclosure. A non-limiting embodiment of a surface heating mechanism 38 may comprise a box furnace (not shown). A box furnace may be configured with various heating mechanisms to heat the outer surface of the workpiece using one or more of flame heating mechanisms, radiant heating mechanisms, induction heating mechanisms, and/or any other suitable heating mechanism known now or hereafter to a person having ordinary skill in the art.

In another non-limiting embodiment, the temperature of the outer surface region 36 of the workpiece 24 may be heated 62 and maintained at or near the workpiece forging temperature and within the workpiece forging temperature range using one or more die heaters 40 of a thermal management system 33. Die heaters 40 may be used to maintain the dies 40 or the die press forging surfaces 44 of the dies at or near the workpiece forging temperature or at temperatures within the temperature forging range. In a non-limiting embodiment, the dies 40 of the thermal management system are heated to a temperature within a range that includes the workpiece forging temperature to 100° F. (55.6° C.) below the workpiece forging temperature. Die heaters 40 may heat the dies 42 or the die press forging surface 44 by any suitable heating mechanism known now or hereinafter by a person skilled in the art, including, but not limited to, flame heating mechanisms, radiant heating mechanisms, conduction heating mechanisms, and/or induction heating mechanisms. In a non-limiting embodiment, a die heater 40 may be a component of a box furnace (not shown). While the thermal management system 33 is shown in place and being used during the equilibration steps, 32,52,60 of the multi-axis forging process show in FIGS. 2(b), (d), and (f), it is recognized that the thermal management system 33 may or may not be in place during the press forging steps 28,46,56 depicted in FIGS. 2(a), (c), and (e).

An aspect of this disclosure includes a non-limiting embodiment wherein one or more of the three orthogonal axis press forging, cooling, and surface heating steps are repeated (i.e., are conducted subsequent to completing an initial sequence of the a-b-c forging, internal region cooling, and outer surface region heating steps) until a true strain of at least 3.5 is achieved in the workpiece. The phrase “true strain” is also known to a person skilled in the art as “logarithmic strain”, and also as “effective strain”. Referring to FIG. 1, this is exemplified by step (g), i.e., repeating (step 64) one or more of steps (a)-(b), (c)-(d), and (e)-(f) until a true strain of at least 3.5 is achieved in the workpiece. In another non-limiting embodiment, referring again to FIG. 1, repeating 64 comprises repeating one or more of steps (a)-(b), (c)-(d), and (e)-(f) until a true strain of at least 4.7 is achieved in the workpiece. In still other non-limiting embodiments, referring again to FIG. 1, repeating 64 comprises repeating one or more of steps (a)-(b), (c)-(d), and (e)-(f) until a true strain of 5 or greater is achieved, or until a true strain of 10 is achieved in the workpiece. In another non-limiting embodiment, steps (a)-(f) shown in FIG. 1 are repeated at least 4 times.

In non-limiting embodiments of thermally managed, high strain rate multi-axis forging according to the present disclosure, after a true strain of 3.7 the internal region of the workpiece comprises an average alpha particle grain size from 4 μm to 6 μm. In a non-limiting embodiment of thermally controlled multi-axis forging, after a true strain of 4.7 is achieved, the workpiece comprises an average grain size in a center region of the workpiece of 4 μm. In a non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, when an average strain of 3.7 or greater is achieved, certain non-limiting embodiments of the methods of this disclosure produce grains that are equiaxed.

In a non-limiting embodiment of a process of multi-axis forging using a thermal management system, the workpiece-press die interface is lubricated with lubricants known to those of ordinary skill, such as, but not limited to, graphite, glasses, and/or other known solid lubricants.

In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece comprises a titanium alloy selected from the group consisting of alpha titanium alloys, alpha+beta titanium alloys, metastable beta titanium alloys, and beta titanium alloys. In another non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece comprises an alpha+beta titanium alloy. In still another non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece comprises a metastable beta titanium alloy. Exemplary titanium alloys that may be processed using embodiments of methods according to the present disclosure include, but are not limited to: alpha+beta titanium alloys, such as, for example, Ti-6Al-4V alloy (UNS Numbers R56400 and R54601) and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo alloy (UNS Numbers R54620 and R54621); near-beta titanium alloys, such as, for example, Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al alloy (UNS R54610)); and metastable beta titanium alloys, such as, for example, Ti-15Mo alloy (UNS R58150) and Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr alloy (UNS unassigned). In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece comprises a titanium alloy that is selected from ASTM Grades 5, 6, 12, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 29, 32, 35, 36, and 38 titanium alloys.

In a non-limiting embodiment, heating a workpiece to a workpiece forging temperature within an alpha+beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material comprises heating the workpiece to a beta soaking temperature; holding the workpiece at the beta soaking temperature for a soaking time sufficient to form a 100% titanium beta phase microstructure in the workpiece; and cooling the workpiece directly to the workpiece forging temperature. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the beta soaking temperature is in a temperature range of the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material up to 300° F. (111° C.) above the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material. Non-limiting embodiments comprise a beta soaking time from 5 minutes to 24 hours. A person skilled in the art will understand that other beta soaking temperatures and beta soaking times are within the scope of embodiments of this disclosure and, for example, that relatively large workpieces may require relatively higher beta soaking temperatures and/or longer beta soaking times to form a 100% beta phase titanium microstructure.

In certain non-limiting embodiments in which the workpiece is held at a beta soaking temperature to form a 100% beta phase microstructure, the workpiece may also be plastically deformed at a plastic deformation temperature in the beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material prior to cooling the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature. Plastic deformation of the workpiece may comprise at least one of drawing, upset forging, and high strain rate multi-axis forging the workpiece. In a non-limiting embodiment, plastic deformation in the beta phase region comprises upset forging the workpiece to a beta-upset strain in the range of 0.1-0.5. In non-limiting embodiments, the plastic deformation temperature is in a temperature range including the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material up to 300° F. (111° C.) above the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material.

FIG. 4 is a schematic temperature-time thermomechanical process chart for a non-limiting method of plastically deforming the workpiece above the beta transus temperature and directly cooling to the workpiece forging temperature. In FIG. 4, a non-limiting method 100 comprises heating 102 the workpiece to a beta soaking temperature 104 above the beta transus temperature 106 of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material and holding or “soaking” 108 the workpiece at the beta soaking temperature 104 to form an all beta titanium phase microstructure in the workpiece. In a non-limiting embodiment according to this disclosure, after soaking 108 the workpiece may be plastically deformed 110. In a non-limiting embodiment, plastic deformation 110 comprises upset forging. In another non-limiting embodiment, plastic deformation 110 comprises upset forging to a true strain of 0.3. In another non-limiting embodiment, plastically deforming 110 the workpiece comprises thermally managed high strain rate multi-axis forging (not shown in FIG. 4) at a beta soaking temperature.

Still referring to FIG. 4, after plastic deformation 110 in the beta phase field, in a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece is cooled 112 to a workpiece forging temperature 114 in the alpha+beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material. In a non-limiting embodiment, cooling 112 comprises air cooling. After cooling 112, the workpiece is thermally managed high strain rate multi-axis forged 114, according to non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure. In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 4, the workpiece is hit or press forged 12 times, i.e., the three orthogonal axes of the workpiece are non-sequentially press forged a total of 4 times each. In other words, referring to FIG. 1, the sequence including steps (a)-(b), (c)-(d), and (e)-(f) is performed 4 times. In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 4, after a multi-axis forging sequence involving 12 hits, the true strain may equal, for example, approximately 3.7. After a multi-axis forging 114, the workpiece is cooled 116 to room temperature. In a non-limiting embodiment, cooling 116 comprises air cooling.

A non-limiting aspect of this disclosure includes thermally managed high strain rate multi-axis forging at two temperatures in the alpha+beta phase field. FIG. 5 is a schematic temperature-time thermomechanical process chart for a non-limiting method that comprises multi-axis forging the titanium alloy workpiece at the first workpiece forging temperature utilizing a non-limiting embodiment of the thermal management feature disclosed hereinabove, followed by cooling to a second workpiece forging temperature in the alpha+beta phase, and multi-axis forging the titanium alloy workpiece at the second workpiece forging temperature utilizing a non-limiting embodiment of the thermal management feature disclosed hereinabove.

In FIG. 5, a non-limiting method 130 comprises heating 132 the workpiece to a beta soaking temperature 134 above the beta transus temperature 136 of the alloy and holding or soaking 138 the workpiece at the beta soaking temperature 134 to form an all beta phase microstructure in the titanium or titanium alloy workpiece. After soaking 138, the workpiece may be plastically deformed 140. In a non-limiting embodiment, plastic deformation 140 comprises upset forging. In another non-limiting embodiment, plastic deformation 140 comprises upset forging to a strain of 0.3. In yet another non-limiting embodiment, plastically deforming 140 the workpiece comprises thermally managed high stain multi-axis forging (not shown in FIG. 5), at a beta soaking temperature.

Still referring to FIG. 5, after plastic deformation 140 in the beta phase field, the workpiece is cooled 142 to a first workpiece forging temperature 144 in the alpha+beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material. In a non-limiting embodiment, cooling 142 comprises air cooling. After cooling 142, the workpiece is high strain rate multi-axis forged 146 at the first workpiece forging temperature employing a thermal management system according to non-limiting embodiments disclosed herein. In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 5, the workpiece is hit or press forged at the first workpiece forging temperature 12 times with 90° rotation between each hit, i.e., the three orthogonal axes of the workpiece are press forged 4 times each. In other words, referring to FIG. 1, the sequence including steps (a)-(b), (c)-(d), and (e)-(f) is performed 4 times. In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 5, after high strain rate multi-axis forging 146 the workpiece at the first workpiece forging temperature, the titanium alloy workpiece is cooled 148 to a second workpiece forging temperature 150 in the alpha+beta phase field. After cooling 148, the workpiece is high strain rate multi-axis forged 150 at the second workpiece forging temperature employing a thermal management system according to non-limiting embodiments disclosed herein. In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 5, the workpiece is hit or press forged at the second workpiece forging temperature a total of 12 times. It is recognized that the number of hits applied to the titanium alloy workpiece at the first and second workpiece forging temperatures can vary depending upon the desired true strain and desired final grain size, and that the number of hits that is appropriate can be determined without undue experimentation. After multi-axis forging 150 at the second workpiece forging temperature, the workpiece is cooled 152 to room temperature. In a non-limiting embodiment, cooling 152 comprises air cooling to room temperature.

In a non-limiting embodiment, the first workpiece forging temperature is in a first workpiece forging temperature range of more than 200° F. (111.1° C.) below the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material to 500° F. (277.8° C.) below the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material, i.e., the first workpiece forging temperature T₁is in the range of T_β−200° F.>T₁≥T_β−500° F.: In a non-limiting embodiment, the second workpiece forging temperature is in a second workpiece forging temperature range of more than 500° F. (277.8° C.) below the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material to 700° F. (388.9° C.) below the beta transus temperature, i.e., the second workpiece forging temperature T₂is in the range of T_β−500° F.>T₂≥T_β−700° F. In a non-limiting embodiment, the titanium alloy workpiece comprises Ti-6-4 alloy; the first workpiece temperature is 1500° F. (815.6° C.); and the second workpiece forging temperature is 1300° F. (704.4° C.).

FIG. 6 is a schematic temperature-time thermomechanical process chart of a non-limiting method according to the present disclosure of plastically deforming a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and a titanium alloy above the beta transus temperature and cooling the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature, while simultaneously employing thermally managed high strain rate multi-axis forging on the workpiece according to non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure. In FIG. 6, a non-limiting method 160 of using thermally managed high strain rate multi-axis forging for grain refining of titanium or a titanium alloy comprises heating 162 the workpiece to a beta soaking temperature 164 above the beta transus temperature 166 of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material and holding or soaking 168 the workpiece at the beta soaking temperature 164 to form an all beta phase microstructure in the workpiece. After soaking 168 the workpiece at the beta soaking temperature, the workpiece is plastically deformed 170. In a non-limiting embodiment, plastic deformation 170 may comprise thermally managed high strain rate multi-axis forging. In a non limiting embodiment, the workpiece is repetitively high strain rate multi-axis forged 172 using a thermal management system as disclosed herein as the workpiece cools through the beta transus temperature. FIG. 6 shows three intermediate high strain rate multi-axis forging 172 steps, but it will be understood that there can be more or fewer intermediate high strain rate multi-axis forging 172 steps, as desired. The intermediate high strain rate multi-axis forging 172 steps are intermediate to the initial high strain rate multi-axis forging step 170 at the soaking temperature, and the final high strain rate multi-axis forging step in the alpha+beta phase field 174 of the metallic material. While FIG. 6 shows one final high strain rate multi-axis forging step wherein the temperature of the workpiece remains entirely in the alpha+beta phase field, it is understood that more than one multi-axis forging step could be performed in the alpha+beta phase field for further grain refinement. According to non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure, at least one final high strain rate multi-axis forging step takes place entirely at temperatures in the alpha+beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy workpiece.

Because the multi-axis forging steps 170,172,174 take place as the temperature of the workpiece cools through the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material, a method embodiment such as is shown in FIG. 6 is referred to herein as “through beta transus high strain rate multi-axis forging”. In a non-limiting embodiment, the thermal management system (33 of FIG. 2) is used in through beta transus multi-axis forging to maintain the temperature of the workpiece at a uniform or substantially uniform temperature prior to each hit at each through beta transus forging temperature and, optionally, to slow the cooling rate After final multi-axis forging 174 the workpiece, the workpiece is cooled 176 to room temperature. In a non-limiting embodiment, cooling 176 comprises air cooling.

Non-limiting embodiments of multi-axis forging using a thermal management system, as disclosed hereinabove, can be used to process titanium and titanium alloy workpieces having cross sections greater than 4 square inches using conventional forging press equipment, and the size of cubic workpieces can be scaled to match the capabilities of an individual press. It has been determined that alpha lamellae from the β-annealed structure break down easily to fine uniform alpha grains at workpiece forging temperatures disclosed in non-limiting embodiments herein. It has also been determined that decreasing the workpiece forging temperature decreases the alpha particle size (grain size).

While not wanting to be held to any particular theory, it is believed that grain refinement that occurs in non-limiting embodiments of thermally managed, high strain rate multi-axis forging according to this disclosure occurs via meta-dynamic recrystallization. In the prior art slow strain rate multi-axis forging process, dynamic recrystallization occurs instantaneously during the application of strain to the material. It is believed that in high strain rate multi-axis forging according to this disclosure, meta-dynamic recrystallization occurs at the end of each deformation or forging hit, while at least the internal region of the workpiece is hot from adiabatic heating. Residual adiabatic heat, internal region cooling times, and external surface region heating influence the extent of grain refinement in non-limiting methods of thermally managed, high strain rate multi-axis forging according to this disclosure.

Multi-axis forging using a thermal management system and cube-shaped workpieces comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and titanium alloys, as disclosed hereinabove, has been observed to produce certain less than optimal results. It is believed that one or more of (1) the cubic workpiece geometry used in certain embodiments of thermally managed multi-axis forging disclosed herein, (2) die chill (i.e., letting the temperature of the dies dip significantly below the workpiece forging temperature), and (3) use of high strain rates concentrates strain at the core region of the workpiece.

An aspect of the present disclosure comprises forging methods that can achieve generally uniform fine grain, very fine grain or ultrafine grain size in billet-size titanium alloys. In other words, a workpiece processed by such methods may include the desired grain size, such as ultrafine grain microstructure throughout the workpiece, rather than only in a central region of the workpiece. Non-limiting embodiments of such methods use “multiple upset and draw” steps on billets having cross-sections greater than 4 square inches. The multiple upset and draw steps are aimed at achieving uniform fine grain, very fine grain or ultrafine grain size throughout the workpiece, while preserving substantially the original dimensions of the workpiece. Because these forging methods include multiple upset and draw steps, they are referred to herein as embodiments of the “MUD” method. The MUD method includes severe plastic deformation and can produce uniform ultrafine grains in billet size titanium alloy workpieces. In non-limiting embodiments according to this disclosure, strain rates used for the upset forging and draw forging steps of the MUD process are in the range of 0.001 s⁻¹to 0.02 s⁻¹, inclusive. In contrast, strain rates typically used for conventional open die upset and draw forging are in the range of 0.03 s⁻¹to 0.1 s⁻¹. The strain rate for MUD is slow enough to prevent adiabatic heating in order to keep the forging temperature in control, yet the strain rate is acceptable for commercial practices.

A schematic representation of non-limiting embodiments of the multiple upset and draw, i.e., “MUD” method is provided in FIG. 7, and a flow chart of certain embodiments of the MUD method is provided in FIG. 8. Referring to FIGS. 7 and 8, a non-limiting method 200 for refining grains in a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and a titanium alloy using multiple upset and draw forging steps comprises heating 202 a cylinder-like titanium or titanium alloy metallic material workpiece to a workpiece forging temperature in the alpha+beta phase field of the metallic material. In a non-limiting embodiment, the shape of the cylinder-like workpiece is a cylinder. In another non limiting embodiment, the shape of the cylinder-like workpiece is an octagonal cylinder or a right octagon.

The cylinder-like workpiece has a starting cross-sectional dimension. In a non-limiting embodiment of the MUD method according to the present disclosure in which the starting workpiece is a cylinder, the starting cross-sectional dimension is the diameter of the cylinder. In a non-limiting embodiment of the MUD method according to the present disclosure in which the starting workpiece is an octagonal cylinder, the starting cross-sectional dimension is the diameter of the circumscribed circle of the octagonal cross-section, i.e., the diameter of the circle that passes through all the vertices of the octagonal cross-section.

When the cylinder-like workpiece is at the workpiece forging temperature, the workpiece is upset forged 204. After upset forging 204, in a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece is rotated (206) 90° and then is subjected to multiple pass draw forging 208. Actual rotation 206 of the workpiece is optional, and the objective of the step is to dispose the workpiece into the correct orientation (refer to FIG. 7) relative to a forging device for subsequent multiple pass draw forging 208 steps.

Multiple pass draw forging comprises incrementally rotating (depicted by arrow 210) the workpiece in a rotational direction (indicated by the direction of arrow 210), followed by draw forging 212 the workpiece after each increment of rotation. In non-limiting embodiments, incrementally rotating and draw forging is repeated 214 until the workpiece comprises the starting cross-sectional dimension. In a non-limiting embodiment, the upset forging and multiple pass draw forging steps are repeated until a true strain of at least 3.5 is achieved in the workpiece. Another non-limiting embodiment comprises repeating the heating, upset forging, and multiple pass draw forging steps until a true strain of at least 4.7 is achieved in the workpiece. In still another non-limiting embodiment, the heating, upset forging, and multiple pass draw forging steps are repeated until a true strain of at least 10 is achieved in the workpiece. It is observed in non-limiting embodiments that when a true strain of 10 imparted to the MUD forging, a UFG alpha microstructure is produced, and that increasing the true strain imparted to the workpiece results smaller average grain sizes.

An aspect of this disclosure is to employ a strain rate during the upset and multiple drawing steps that is sufficient to result in severe plastic deformation of the titanium alloy workpiece, which, in non-limiting embodiments, further results in ultrafine grain size. In a non limiting embodiment, a strain rate used in upset forging is in the range of 0.001 s⁻¹to 0.003 s⁻¹. In another non-limiting embodiment, a strain rate used in the multiple draw forging steps is the range of 0.01 s⁻¹to 0.02 s⁻¹. It is determined that strain rates in these ranges do not result in adiabatic heating of the workpiece, which enables workpiece temperature control, and are sufficient for an economically acceptable commercial practice.

In a non-limiting embodiment, after completion of the MUD method, the workpiece has substantially the original dimensions of the starting cylinder 214 or octagonal cylinder 216. In yet another non-limiting embodiment, after completion of the MUD method, the workpiece has substantially the same cross-section as the starting workpiece. In a non-limiting embodiment, a single upset requires many draw hits to return the workpiece to a shape including the starting cross-section of the workpiece.

In a non-limiting embodiment of the MUD method wherein the workpiece is in the shape of a cylinder, incrementally rotating and draw forging further comprises multiples steps of rotating the cylindrical workpiece in 15° increments and subsequently draw forging, until the cylindrical workpiece is rotated through 360° and is draw forged at each increment. In a non-limiting embodiment of the MUD method wherein the workpiece is in the shape of a cylinder, after each upset forge, twenty-four incremental rotation+draw forging steps are employed to bring the workpiece to substantially its starting cross-sectional dimension. In another non-limiting embodiment, when the workpiece is in the shape of an octagonal cylinder, incrementally rotating and draw forging further comprises multiples steps of rotating the cylindrical workpiece in 45° increments and subsequently draw forging, until the cylindrical workpiece is rotated through 360° and is draw forged at each increment. In a non-limiting embodiment of the MUD method wherein the workpiece is in the shape of an octagonal cylinder, after each upset forge, eight incremental rotation+draw forging steps are employed to bring the workpiece substantially to its starting cross-sectional dimension. It was observed in non-limiting embodiments of the MUD method that manipulation of an octagonal cylinder by handling equipment was more precise than manipulation of a cylinder by handling equipment. It also was observed that manipulation of an octagonal cylinder by handling equipment in a non-limiting embodiment of a MUD was more precise than manipulation of a cubic workpiece using hand tongs in non-limiting embodiments of the thermally managed high strain rate MAF process disclosed herein. It is recognized that other amounts of incremental rotation and draw forging steps for cylinder-like billets are within the scope of this disclosure, and such other possible amounts of incremental rotation may be determined by a person skilled in the art without undue experimentation.

In a non-limiting embodiment of MUD according to this disclosure, a workpiece forging temperature comprises a temperature within a workpiece forging temperature range. In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece forging temperature is in a workpiece forging temperature range of 100° F. (55.6° C.) below the beta transus temperature (T_β) of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material to 700° F. (388.9° C.) below the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material. In still another non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece forging temperature is in a temperature range of 300° F. (166.7° C.) below the beta transition temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material to 625° F. (347° C.) below the beta transition temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material. In a non-limiting embodiment, the low end of a workpiece forging temperature range is a temperature in the alpha+beta phase field at which substantial damage does not occur to the surface of the workpiece during the forging hit, as may be determined without undue experimentation by a person having ordinary skill in the art.

In a non-limiting MUD embodiment according to the present disclosure, the workpiece forging temperature range for a Ti-6-4 alloy (Ti-6Al-4V; UNS No. R56400), which has a beta transus temperature (T_β) of about 1850° F. (1010° C.), may be, for example, from 1150° F. (621.1° C.) to 1750° F. (954.4° C.), or in another embodiment may be from 1225° F. (662.8° C.) to 1550° F. (843.3° C.).

Non-limiting embodiments comprise multiple reheating steps during the MUD method. In a non-limiting embodiment, the titanium alloy workpiece is heated to the workpiece forging temperature after upset forging the titanium alloy workpiece. In another non-limiting embodiment, the titanium alloy workpiece is heated to the workpiece forging temperature prior to a draw forging step of the multiple pass draw forging. In another non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece is heated as needed to bring the actual workpiece temperature back to the workpiece forging temperature after an upset or draw forging step.

It was determined that embodiments of the MUD method impart redundant work or extreme deformation, also referred to as severe plastic deformation, which is aimed at creating ultrafine grains in a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and a titanium alloy. Without intending to be bound to any particular theory of operation, it is believed that the round or octagonal cross sectional shape of cylindrical and octagonal cylindrical workpieces, respectively, distributes strain more evenly across the cross-sectional area of the workpiece during a MUD method. The deleterious effect of friction between the workpiece and the forging die is also reduced by reducing the area of the workpiece in contact with the die.

In addition, it was also determined that decreasing the temperature during the MUD method reduces the final grain size to a size that is characteristic of the specific temperature being used. Referring to FIG. 8, in a non-limiting embodiment of a method 200 for refining the grain size of a workpiece, after processing by the MUD method at the workpiece forging temperature, the temperature of the workpiece may be cooled 216 to a second workpiece forging temperature. After cooling the workpiece to the second workpiece forging temperature, in a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece is upset forged at the second workpiece forging temperature 218. The workpiece is rotated 220 or oriented for subsequent draw forging steps. The workpiece is multiple-step draw forged at the second workpiece forging temperature 222. Multiple-step draw forging at the second workpiece forging temperature 222 comprises incrementally rotating 224 the workpiece in a rotational direction (refer to FIG. 7), and draw forging at the second workpiece forging temperature 226 after each increment of rotation. In a non-limiting embodiment, the steps of upset, incrementally rotating 224, and draw forging are repeated 226 until the workpiece comprises the starting cross-sectional dimension. In another non-limiting embodiment, the steps of upset forging at the second workpiece temperature 218, rotating 220, and multiple step draw forging 222 are repeated until a true strain of 10 or greater is achieved in the workpiece. It is recognized that the MUD process can be continued until any desired true strain is imparted to the titanium or titanium alloy workpiece.

In a non-limiting embodiment comprising a multi-temperature MUD method, the workpiece forging temperature, or a first workpiece forging temperature, is about 1600° F. (871.1° C.) and the second workpiece forging temperature is about 1500° F. (815.6° C.). Subsequent workpiece forging temperatures that are lower than the first and second workpiece forging temperatures, such as a third workpiece forging temperature, a fourth workpiece forging temperature, and so forth, are within the scope of non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure.

As forging proceeds, grain refinement results in decreasing flow stress at a fixed temperature. It was determined that decreasing the forging temperature for sequential upset and draw steps keeps the flow stress constant and increases the rate of microstructural refinement. It has been determined that in non-limiting embodiments of MUD according to this disclosure, a true strain of 10 results in a uniform equiaxed alpha ultrafine grain microstructure in titanium and titanium alloy workpieces, and that the lower temperature of a two-temperature (or multi-temperature) MUD process can be determinative of the final grain size after a true strain of 10 is imparted to the MUD forging.

An aspect of this disclosure includes that after processing by the MUD method, subsequent deformation steps are possible without coarsening the refined grain size, as long as the temperature of the workpiece is not subsequently heated above the beta transus temperature of the titanium alloy. For example, in a non-limiting embodiment, a subsequent deformation practice after MUD processing may include draw forging, multiple draw forging, upset forging, or any combination of two or more of these forging steps at temperatures in the alpha+beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy. In a non-limiting embodiment, subsequent deformation or forging steps include a combination of multiple pass draw forging, upset forging, and draw forging to reduce the starting cross-sectional dimension of the cylinder-like workpiece to a fraction of the cross-sectional dimension, such as, for example, but not limited to, one-half of the cross-sectional dimension, one-quarter of the cross-sectional dimension, and so forth, while still maintaining a uniform fine grain, very fine grain or ultrafine grain structure in the titanium or titanium alloy workpiece.

In a non-limiting embodiment of a MUD method, the workpiece comprises a titanium alloy selected from the group consisting of an alpha titanium alloy, an alpha+beta titanium alloy, a metastable beta titanium alloy, and a beta titanium alloy. In another non-limiting embodiment of a MUD method, the workpiece comprises an alpha+beta titanium alloy. In still another non-limiting embodiment of the multiple upset and draw process disclosed herein, the workpiece comprises a metastable beta titanium alloy. In a non-limiting embodiment of a MUD method, the workpiece is a titanium alloy selected from ASTM Grades 5, 6, 12, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 29, 32, 35, 36, and 38 titanium alloys.

Prior to heating the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature in the alpha+beta phase field according to MUD embodiments of this disclosure, in a non-limiting embodiment the workpiece may be heated to a beta soaking temperature, held at the beta soaking temperature for a beta soaking time sufficient to form a 100% beta phase titanium microstructure in the workpiece, and cooled to room temperature. In a non-limiting embodiment, the beta soaking temperature is in a beta soaking temperature range that includes the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy up to 300° F. (111° C.) above the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy. In another non-limiting embodiment, the beta soaking time is from 5 minutes to 24 hours.

In a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece is a billet that is coated on all or certain surfaces with a lubricating coating that reduces friction between the workpiece and the forging dies. In a non-limiting embodiment, the lubricating coating is a solid lubricant such as, but not limited to, one of graphite and a glass lubricant. Other lubricating coatings known now or hereafter to a person having ordinary skill in the art are within the scope of this disclosure. In addition, in a non-limiting embodiment of the MUD method using cylinder-like workpieces, the contact area between the workpiece and the forging dies is small relative to the contact area in multi-axis forging of a cubic workpiece. The reduced contact area results in reduced die friction and a more uniform titanium alloy workpiece microstructure and macrostructure.

Prior to heating the workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and titanium alloys to the workpiece forging temperature in the alpha+beta phase field according to MUD embodiments of this disclosure, in a non-limiting embodiment, the workpiece is plastically deformed at a plastic deformation temperature in the beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy metallic material after being held at a beta soaking time sufficient to form 100% beta phase in the titanium or titanium alloy and prior to cooling to room temperature. In a non-limiting embodiment, the plastic deformation temperature is equivalent to the beta soaking temperature. In another non-limiting embodiment, the plastic deformation temperature is in a plastic deformation temperature range that includes the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy up to 300° F. (111° C.) above the beta transus temperature of the titanium or titanium alloy.

In a non-limiting embodiment, plastically deforming the workpiece in the beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy comprises at least one of drawing, upset forging, and high strain rate multi-axis forging the titanium alloy workpiece. In another non-limiting embodiment, plastically deforming the workpiece in the beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy comprises multiple upset and draw forging according to non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure, and wherein cooling the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature comprises air cooling. In still another non-limiting embodiment, plastically deforming the workpiece in the beta phase field of the titanium or titanium alloy comprises upset forging the workpiece to a 30-35% reduction in height or another dimension, such as length.

Another aspect of this disclosure may include heating the forging dies during forging. A non-limiting embodiment comprises heating dies of a forge used to forge the workpiece to temperature in a temperature range bounded by the workpiece forging temperature to 100° F. (55.6° C.) below the workpiece forging temperature, inclusive.

It is believed that the certain methods disclosed herein also may be applied to metals and metal alloys other than titanium and titanium alloys in order to reduce the grain size of workpieces of those alloys. Another aspect of this disclosure includes non-limiting embodiments of a method for high strain rate multi-step forging of metals and metal alloys. A non-limiting embodiment of the method comprises heating a workpiece comprising a metal or a metal alloy to a workpiece forging temperature. After heating, the workpiece is forged at the workpiece forging temperature at a strain rate sufficient to adiabatically heat an internal region of the workpiece. After forging, a waiting period is employed before the next forging step. During the waiting period, the temperature of the adiabatically heated internal region of the metal alloy workpiece is allowed to cool to the workpiece forging temperature, while at least a one surface region of the workpiece is heated to the workpiece forging temperature. The steps of forging the workpiece and then allowing the adiabatically heated internal region of the workpiece to equilibrate to the workpiece forging temperature while heating at least one surface region of the metal alloy workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature are repeated until a desired characteristic is obtained. In a non-limiting embodiment, forging comprises one or more of press forging, upset forging, draw forging, and roll forging. In another non-limiting embodiment, the metal alloy is selected from the group consisting of titanium alloys, zirconium and zirconium alloys, aluminum alloys, ferrous alloys, and superalloys. In still another non-limiting embodiment, the desired characteristic is one or more of an imparted strain, an average grain size, a shape, and a mechanical property. Mechanical properties include, but are not limited to, strength, ductility, fracture toughness, and hardness,

Several examples illustrating certain non-limiting embodiments according to the present disclosure follow.

EXAMPLE 1

Multi-axis forging using a thermal management system was performed on a titanium alloy workpiece consisting of alloy Ti-6-4 having equiaxed alpha grains with grain sizes in the range of 10-30 μm. A thermal management system was employed that included heated dies and flame heating to heat the surface region of the titanium alloy workpiece. The workpiece consisted of a 4-inch sided cube. The workpiece was heated in a gas-fired box furnace to a beta annealing temperature of 1940° F. (1060° C.), i.e., about 50° F. (27.8° C.) above the beta transus temperature. The beta anneal soaking time was 1 hour. The beta annealed workpiece was air cooled to room temperature, i.e., about 70° F. (21.1° C.).

The beta annealed workpiece was then heated in a gas-fired box furnace to the workpiece forging temperature of 1500° F. (815.6° C.), which is in the alpha+beta phase field of the alloy. The beta annealed workpiece was first press forged in the direction of the A axis of the workpiece to a spacer height of 3.25 inches. The ram speed of the press forge was 1 inch/second, which corresponded to a strain rate of 0.27 s⁻¹. The adiabatically heated center of the workpiece and the flame heated surface region of the workpiece were allowed to equilibrate to the workpiece forging temperature for about 4.8 minutes. The workpiece was rotated and press forged in the direction of the B axis of the workpiece to a spacer height of 3.25 inches. The ram speed of the press forge was 1 inch/second, which corresponded to a strain rate of 0.27 s⁻¹. The adiabatically heated center of the workpiece and the flame heated surface region of the workpiece were allowed to equilibrate to the workpiece forging temperature for about 4.8 minutes. The workpiece was rotated and press forged in the direction of the C axis of the workpiece to a spacer height of 4 inches. The ram speed of the press forge was 1 inch/second, which corresponded to a strain rate of 0.27 s⁻¹. The adiabatically heated center of the workpiece and the flame heated surface region of the workpiece were allowed to equilibrate to the workpiece forging temperature for about 4.8 minutes. The a-b-c (multi-axis) forging described above was repeated four times for a total of 12 forge hits, producing a true strain of 4.7. After multi-axis forging, the workpiece was water quenched. The thermomechanical processing path for Example 1 is shown in FIG.

EXAMPLE 2

A sample of the starting material of Example 1 and a sample of the material as processed in Example 1 were metallographically prepared and the grain structures were microscopically observed. FIG. 10 is a micrograph of the beta annealed material of Example 1 showing equiaxed grains with grain sizes between 10-30 μm. FIG. 11 is a micrograph of a center region of the a-b-c forged sample of Example 1. The grain structure of FIG. 11 has equiaxed grain sizes on the order of 4 μm and would qualify as “very fine grain” (VFG) material. In the sample, the VFG sized grains were observed predominantly in the center of the sample. Grain sizes in the sample were larger as the distance from the center of the sample increased.

EXAMPLE 3

Finite element modeling was used to determine internal region cooling times required to cool the adiabatically heated internal region to a workpiece forging temperature. In the modeling, a 5 inch diameter by 7 inch long alpha-beta titanium alloy preform was virtually heated to a multi-axis forging temperature of 1500° F. (815.6° C.). The forging dies were simulated to be heated to 600° F. (315.6° C.). A ram speed was simulated at 1 inch/second, which corresponds to a strain rate 0.27 s⁻¹. Different intervals for the internal region cooling times were input to determine an internal region cooling time required to cool the adiabatically heated internal region of the simulated workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature. From the plot of FIG. 10, it is seen that the modeling suggests that internal region cooling times of between 30 and 45 seconds could be used to cool the adiabatically heated internal region to a workpiece forging temperature of about 1500° F. (815.6° C.).

EXAMPLE 4

High strain rate multi-axis forging using a thermal management system was performed on a titanium alloy workpiece consisting of a 4 inch (10.16 cm) sided cube of alloy Ti-6-4. The titanium alloy workpiece was beta annealed at 1940° F. (1060° C.) for 60 minutes. After beta annealing, the workpiece was air cooled to room temperature. The titanium alloy workpiece was heated to a workpiece forging temperature of 1500° F. (815.6° C.), which is in the alpha-beta phase field of the titanium alloy workpiece. The workpiece was multi-axis forged using a thermal management system comprising gas flame heaters and heated dies according to non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure to equilibrate the temperature of the external surface region of the workpiece to the workpiece forging temperature between the hits of multi-axis forging. The workpiece was press forged to 3.2 inches (8.13 cm). Using a-b-c rotation, the workpiece was subsequently press forged in each hit to 4 inches (10.16 cm). A ram speed of 1 inch per second (2.54 cm/s) was used in the press forging steps, and a pause, i.e., an internal region cooling time or equilibration time of 15 seconds was used between press forging hits. The equilibration time is the time that is allowed for the adiabatically heated internal region to cool to the workpiece forging temperature while heating the external surface region to the workpiece forging temperature. A total of 12 hits were used at the 1500° F. (815.6° C.) workpiece temperature, with a 90° rotation of the cubic workpiece between hits, i.e., the cubic workpiece was a-b-c forged four times.

The temperature of the workpiece was then lowered to a second workpiece forging temperature of 1300° F. (704.4° C.). The titanium alloy workpiece was high strain multi-axis forged according to non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure, using a ram speed of 1 inch per second (2.54 cm/s) and internal region cooling times of 15 seconds between each forging hit. The same thermal management system used to manage the first workpiece forging temperature was used to manage the second workpiece forging temperature. A total of 6 forging hits were applied at the second workpiece forging temperature, i.e., the cubic workpiece was a-b-c forged two times at the second workpiece forging temperature.

EXAMPLE 5

A micrograph of the center of the cube after processing as described in Example 4 is shown in FIG. 13. From FIG. 13, it is observed that the grains at the center of the cube have an equiaxed average grain size of less than 3 μm, i.e., an ultrafine grain size.

Although the center or internal region of the cube processed according to Example 4 had an ultrafine grain size, it was also observed that the grains in regions of the processed cube external to the center region were not ultrafine grains. This is evident from FIG. 14, which is a photograph of a cross-section of the cube processed according to Example 4.

EXAMPLE 6

Finite element modeling was used to simulate deformation in thermally managed multi-axis forging of a cube. The simulation was carried out for a 4 inch sided cube of Ti-6-4 alloy that was beta annealed at 1940° F. (1060° C.) until an all beta microstructure is obtained. The simulation used isothermal multi-axis forging, as used in certain non-limiting embodiments of a method disclosed herein, conducted at 1500° F. (815.6° C.). The workpiece was a-b-c press forged with twelve total hits, i.e., four sets of a-b-c orthogonal axis forgings/rotations. In the simulation, the cube was cooled to 1300° F. (704.4° C.) and high strain rate press forged for 6 hits, i.e., two sets of a-b-c orthogonal axis forgings/rotations. The simulated ram speed was 1 inch per second (2.54 cm/s). The results shown in FIG. 15 predict levels of strain in the cube after processing as described above. The finite element modeling simulation predicts a maximum strain of 16.8 at the center of the cube. The highest strain, however, is very localized, and the majority of the cross-section does not achieve a strain greater than 10.

EXAMPLE 7

A workpiece comprising alloy Ti-6-4 in the configuration of a five-inch diameter cylinder that is 7 inches high (i.e., measured along the longitudinal axis) was beta annealed at 1940° F. (1060° C.) for 60 minutes. The beta annealed cylinder was air quenched to preserve the all beta microstructure. The beta annealed cylinder was heated to a workpiece forging temperature of 1500° F. (815.6° C.) and was followed by multiple upset and draw forging according to non-limiting embodiments of this disclosure. The multiple upset and draw sequence included upset forging to a 5.25 inch height (i.e., reduced in dimension along the longitudinal axis), and multiple draw forging, including incremental rotations of 45° about the longitudinal axis and draw forging to form an octagonal cylinder having a starting and finishing circumscribed circle diameter of 4.75 inches. A total of 36 draw forgings with incremental rotations were used, with no wait times between hits.

EXAMPLE 8

A micrograph of a center region of a cross-section of the sample prepared in Example 7 is presented in FIG. 16(a). A micrograph of the near surface region of a cross-section of the sample prepared in Example 7 is presented in FIG. 16(b). Examination of FIGS. 16(a) and (b) reveals that the sample processed according to Example 7 achieved a uniform and equiaxed grain structure having an average grain size of less than 3 μm, which is classified as very fine grain (VFG).

EXAMPLE 9

A workpiece comprising alloy Ti-6-4 configured as a ten-inch diameter cylindrical billet having a length of 24 inches was coated with silica glass slurry lubricant. The billet was beta annealed at 1940° C. The beta annealed billet was upset forged from 24 inches to a 30-35% reduction in length. After beta upsetting, the billet was subjected to multiple pass draw forging, which comprised incrementally rotating and draw forging the billet to a ten-inch octagonal cylinder. The beta processed octagonal cylinder was air cooled to room temperature. For the multiple upset and draw process, the octagonal cylinder was heated to a first workpiece forging temperature of 1600° F. (871.1° C.). The octagonal cylinder was upset forged to a 20-30% reduction in length, and then multiple draw forged, which included rotating the working by 45° increments followed by draw forging, until the octagonal cylinder achieved its starting cross-sectional dimension. Upset forging and multiple pass draw forging at the first workpiece forging temperature was repeated three times, and the workpiece was reheated as needed to bring the workpiece temperature back to the workpiece forging temperature. The workpiece was cooled to a second workpiece forging temperature of 1500° F. (815.6° C.). The multiple upset and draw forging procedure used at the first workpiece forging temperature was repeated at the second workpiece forging temperature. A schematic thermomechanical temperature-time chart for the sequence of steps in this Example 9 is presented in FIG. 17.

The workpiece was multiple pass draw forged at a temperature in the alpha+beta phase field using conventional forging parameters and cut in half for upset. The workpiece was upset forged at a temperature in the alpha+beta phase field using conventional forging parameters to a 20% reduction in length. In a finishing step, the workpiece was draw forged to a 5 inch diameter round cylinder having a length of 36 inches.

EXAMPLE 10

A macro-photograph of a cross-section of a sample processed according to the non-limiting embodiment of Example 9 is presented in FIG. 18. It is seen that a uniform grain size is present throughout the billet. A micrograph of the sample processed according to the non-limiting embodiment of Example 9 is presented in FIG. 19. The micrograph demonstrates that the grain size is in the very fine grain size range.

EXAMPLE 11

Finite element modeling was used to simulate deformation of the sample prepared in Example 9. The finite element model is presented in FIG. 20. The finite element model predicts relatively uniform effective strain of greater than 10 for the majority of the 5-inch round billet.

It will be understood that the present description illustrates those aspects of the invention relevant to a clear understanding of the invention. Certain aspects that would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and that, therefore, would not facilitate a better understanding of the invention have not been presented in order to simplify the present description. Although only a limited number of embodiments of the present invention are necessarily described herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will, upon considering the foregoing description, recognize that many modifications and variations of the invention may be employed. All such variations and modifications of the invention are intended to be covered by the foregoing description and the following claims.

Claims

1. A method of refining grain size in a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and a titanium alloy, the method comprising: heating the workpiece to a beta soaking temperature;holding the workpiece at the beta soaking temperature for a beta soaking time sufficient to form a 100% beta phase microstructure in the workpiece;cooling the workpiece to room temperature;heating the workpiece to a workpiece forging temperature in a workpiece forging temperature range within an alpha+beta phase field of the metallic material, wherein the workpiece comprises a starting cross-sectional dimension;upset forging the workpiece within the workpiece forging temperature range; andmultiple pass draw forging the workpiece within the workpiece forging temperature range; wherein multiple pass draw forging comprises incrementally rotating an entirety of the workpiece in a rotational direction followed by draw forging the workpiece after each incremental rotation;wherein incrementally rotating and draw forging is repeated until a true strain of at least 3.5 is achieved in the workpiece; andwherein the workpiece is not heated during the multiple pass draw forging.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein a strain rate used in upset forging and draw forging is the range of 0.001 s−1 to 0.02 s−1, inclusive.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the workpiece comprises a cylindrical workpiece, and wherein incrementally rotating and draw forging further comprises rotating an entirety of the cylindrical workpiece in 15° increments followed by draw forging after each rotation, until the cylindrical workpiece is rotated through 360° .
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the workpiece comprises a right octagonal workpiece, and wherein incrementally rotating and draw forging further comprises rotating an entirety of the octagonal workpiece in 45° increments followed by draw forging after each rotation, until the right octagonal workpiece is rotated through 360° .
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the workpiece comprises a titanium alloy selected from the group consisting of an alpha titanium alloy, an alpha+beta titanium alloy, a metastable beta titanium alloy, and a beta titanium alloy.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the workpiece comprises an alpha+beta titanium alloy.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the workpiece comprises one of ASTM Grade 5, 6,12, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 29, 32, 35, 36, and 38 titanium alloys.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the beta soaking temperature is in a temperature range of the beta transus temperature of the metallic material up to 300° F. (111° C.) above the beta transus temperature of the metallic material, inclusive.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the beta soaking time is from 5minutes to 24 hours.
10. The method of claim 1, further comprising plastically deforming the workpiece at a plastic deformation temperature in the beta phase field of the metallic material prior to cooling the workpiece to room temperature.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein plastically deforming the workpiece comprises at least one of drawing, upset forging, and high strain rate multi-axis forging the workpiece, and wherein high strain rate multi-axis forging the workpiece comprises multi-axis forging at a strain rate of 0.2 s−to 0.8 s−1.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the plastic deformation temperature is in a plastic deformation temperature range of the beta transus temperature of the metallic material up to 300° F. (111° C.) above the beta transus temperature of the metallic material, inclusive.
13. The method of claim 10, wherein plastically deforming the workpiece comprises multiple upset and draw forging, and wherein cooling the workpiece to room temperature comprises air cooling the workpiece.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the workpiece forging temperature range is 100° F. (55.6° C.) below a beta transus temperature of the metallic material to 700° F. (388.9° C.) below the beta transus temperature of the metallic material, inclusive.
15. The method of claim 1, further comprising repeating the heating, upset forging, and multiple pass draw forging until a true strain of at least 10 is achieved in the workpiece.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein on completion of the method a metallic material microstructure comprises ultra fine grain sized alpha grains having alpha grain sizes of 4 μm or less.
17. The method of claim 1, further comprising, subsequent to multiple pass draw forging the workpiece within the workpiece forging temperature range: cooling the workpiece to a temperature within a second workpiece temperature range in the alpha+beta phase field of the metallic material;upset forging the workpiece within the second workpiece forging temperature range;multiple pass draw forging the workpiece within the second workpiece forging temperature range; wherein multiple pass draw forging comprises incrementally rotating the entirety of the workpiece in a rotational direction followed by draw forging the titanium alloy workpiece after each rotation; andwherein incrementally rotating and draw forging is repeated until the workpiece comprises the starting cross-sectional dimension; andrepeating the upset forging and the multiple pass draw forging within the second workpiece forging temperature range until a true strain of at least 10 is achieved in the workpiece.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein a strain rate used in upset forging and draw forging is the range of 0.001 s−1 to 0.02 s−1, inclusive.
19. A method of refining grain size in a workpiece comprising a metallic material selected from titanium and a titanium alloy, the method comprising: heating the workpiece to a beta soaking temperature range from the beta transus temperature of the metallic material to 300° F. (111° C.) above the beta transus temperature of the metallic material;holding the workpiece within the beta soaking temperature range for time sufficient to form a 100% beta phase microstructure in the workpiece;cooling the workpiece;heating the workpiece to a workpiece forging temperature range within an alpha+beta phase field of the metallic material, wherein the workpiece comprises a starting cross-sectional dimension;upset forging the workpiece within the workpiece forging temperature range; andmultiple pass draw forging the workpiece within the workpiece forging temperature range; wherein multiple pass draw forging comprises incrementally rotating an entirety of the workpiece in a rotational direction followed by draw forging the workpiece after each incremental rotation;wherein incrementally rotating and draw forging is repeated until a true strain of at least 3.5 is achieved in the workpiece; andwherein the workpiece is not heated during the multiple pass draw forging.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein a strain rate used in upset forging and draw forging is the range of 0.001 s−1 to 0.02 s—1, inclusive.
21. The method of claim 19, wherein the workpiece comprises a cylindrical workpiece, and wherein incrementally rotating and draw forging further comprises rotating an entirety of the cylindrical workpiece in 15° increments followed by draw forging after each rotation, until the cylindrical workpiece is rotated through at least 360°.
22. The method of claim 19, wherein the workpiece comprises a titanium alloy selected from the group consisting of an alpha titanium alloy, an alpha+beta titanium alloy, a metastable beta titanium alloy, and a beta titanium alloy.
23. The method of claim 19, wherein the workpiece comprises one of ASTM Grade 5, 6,12, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 29, 32, 35, 36, and 38 titanium alloys.
24. The method of claim 19, wherein the workpiece is held within the beta soaking temperature range for 5 minutes to 24 hours.
25. The method of claim 19, wherein the workpiece forging temperature range is 100° F. (55.6° C.) below a beta transus temperature of the metallic material to 700° F. (388.9° C.) below the beta transus temperature of the metallic material, inclusive.
26. The method of claim 19, further comprising repeating the heating, upset forging, and multiple pass draw forging until a true strain of at least 10 is achieved in the workpiece.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 as a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/882,538, filed on Sep. 15, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,613,818, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with United States government support under NIST Contract Number 70NANB7H7038, awarded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), United States Department of Commerce. The United States government may have certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (277)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
2857269	Vordahl	Oct 1958	A
2893864	Harris et al.	Jul 1959	A
2932886	Althouse	Apr 1960	A
2974076	Vordahl	Mar 1961	A
3015292	Bridwell	Jan 1962	A
3025905	Haerr	Mar 1962	A
3060564	Corral	Oct 1962	A
3082083	Levy et al.	Mar 1963	A
3117471	O'Connell	Jan 1964	A
3313138	Spring et al.	Apr 1967	A
3379522	Vordahl	Apr 1968	A
3436277	Bomberger, Jr. et al.	Apr 1969	A
3469975	Bomberger, Jr. et al.	Sep 1969	A
3489617	Wuerfel	Jan 1970	A
3584487	Carlson	Jun 1971	A
3605477	Carlson	Sep 1971	A
3615378	Bomberger, Jr. et al.	Oct 1971	A
3635068	Watmough et al.	Jan 1972	A
3649259	Heitman	Mar 1972	A
3676225	Owczarski et al.	Jul 1972	A
3686041	Lee	Aug 1972	A
3802877	Parris et al.	Apr 1974	A
3815395	Sass	Jun 1974	A
3835282	Sass et al.	Sep 1974	A
3922899	Fremont et al.	Dec 1975	A
3979815	Nakanose et al.	Sep 1976	A
4053330	Henricks et al.	Oct 1977	A
4067734	Curtis et al.	Jan 1978	A
4094708	Hubbard et al.	Jun 1978	A
4098623	Ibaraki et al.	Jul 1978	A
4120187	Mullen	Oct 1978	A
4138141	Andersen	Feb 1979	A
4147639	Lee et al.	Apr 1979	A
4150279	Metcalfe et al.	Apr 1979	A
4163380	Masoner	Aug 1979	A
4197643	Burstone et al.	Apr 1980	A
4229216	Paton et al.	Oct 1980	A
4299626	Paton et al.	Nov 1981	A
4309226	Chen	Jan 1982	A
4472207	Kinoshita et al.	Sep 1984	A
4473125	Addudle et al.	Sep 1984	A
4482398	Eylon et al.	Nov 1984	A
4510788	Ferguson et al.	Apr 1985	A
4543132	Berczik et al.	Sep 1985	A
4614550	Leonard et al.	Sep 1986	A
4631092	Ruckle et al.	Dec 1986	A
4639281	Sastry et al.	Jan 1987	A
4668290	Wang et al.	May 1987	A
4687290	Prussas	Aug 1987	A
4688290	Hogg	Aug 1987	A
4690716	Sabol et al.	Sep 1987	A
4714468	Wang et al.	Dec 1987	A
4798133	Yonezawa et al.	Jan 1989	A
4799975	Ouchi et al.	Jan 1989	A
4808249	Eyelon et al.	Feb 1989	A
4842653	Wirth et al.	Jun 1989	A
4851055	Eylon et al.	Jul 1989	A
4854977	Alheritiere et al.	Aug 1989	A
4857269	Wang et al.	Aug 1989	A
4878966	Alheritiere et al.	Nov 1989	A
4888973	Comley	Dec 1989	A
4889170	Mae et al.	Dec 1989	A
4917728	Enright	Apr 1990	A
4919728	Kohl et al.	Apr 1990	A
4943412	Bania et al.	Jul 1990	A
4957567	Krueger et al.	Sep 1990	A
4975125	Chakrabarti et al.	Dec 1990	A
4980127	Parris et al.	Dec 1990	A
5026520	Bhowal et al.	Jun 1991	A
5032189	Eylon et al.	Jul 1991	A
5041262	Gigliotti, Jr.	Aug 1991	A
5074907	Amato et al.	Dec 1991	A
5080727	Aihara et al.	Jan 1992	A
5094812	Dulmaine et al.	Mar 1992	A
5141566	Kitayama et al.	Aug 1992	A
5156807	Nagata et al.	Oct 1992	A
5162159	Tenhover et al.	Nov 1992	A
5169597	Davidson et al.	Dec 1992	A
5173134	Chakrabarti et al.	Dec 1992	A
5201457	Kitayama et al.	Apr 1993	A
5244517	Kimura et al.	Sep 1993	A
5256369	Ogawa et al.	Oct 1993	A
5264055	Champin et al.	Nov 1993	A
5277718	Paxson et al.	Jan 1994	A
5310522	Culling	May 1994	A
5330591	Vasseur	Jul 1994	A
5332454	Meredith et al.	Jul 1994	A
5332545	Love	Jul 1994	A
5342458	Adams et al.	Aug 1994	A
5358586	Schutz	Oct 1994	A
5359872	Nashiki	Nov 1994	A
5360496	Kuhlman et al.	Nov 1994	A
5374323	Kuhlman et al.	Dec 1994	A
5399212	Chakrabarti et al.	Mar 1995	A
5442847	Semiatin et al.	Aug 1995	A
5472526	Gigliotti, Jr.	Dec 1995	A
5494636	Dupioron et al.	Feb 1996	A
5509979	Kimura	Apr 1996	A
5516375	Ogawa et al.	May 1996	A
5520879	Saito et al.	May 1996	A
5527403	Schirra et al.	Jun 1996	A
5545262	Hardee et al.	Aug 1996	A
5545268	Yashiki et al.	Aug 1996	A
5547523	Blankenship et al.	Aug 1996	A
5558728	Kobayashi et al.	Sep 1996	A
5580665	Taguchi et al.	Dec 1996	A
5600989	Segal et al.	Feb 1997	A
5649280	Blankenship et al.	Jul 1997	A
5658403	Kimura	Aug 1997	A
5662745	Takayama et al.	Sep 1997	A
5679183	Takagi et al.	Oct 1997	A
5698050	El-Soudani	Dec 1997	A
5758420	Schmidt et al.	Jun 1998	A
5759305	Benz et al.	Jun 1998	A
5759484	Kashii et al.	Jun 1998	A
5795413	Gorman	Aug 1998	A
5871595	Ahmed et al.	Feb 1999	A
5896643	Tanaka	Apr 1999	A
5897830	Abkowitz et al.	Apr 1999	A
5904204	Teraoka et al.	May 1999	A
5954724	Davidson	Sep 1999	A
5980655	Kosaka	Nov 1999	A
6002118	Kawano et al.	Dec 1999	A
6032508	Ashworth et al.	Mar 2000	A
6044685	Delgado et al.	Apr 2000	A
6053993	Reichman et al.	Apr 2000	A
6059904	Benz et al.	May 2000	A
6071360	Gillespie	Jun 2000	A
6077369	Kusano et al.	Jun 2000	A
6127044	Yamamoto et al.	Oct 2000	A
6132526	Carisey et al.	Oct 2000	A
6139659	Takahashi et al.	Oct 2000	A
6143241	Hajaligol et al.	Nov 2000	A
6187045	Fehring et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6197129	Zhu et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6200685	Davidson	Mar 2001	B1
6209379	Nishida et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6216508	Matsubara et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6228189	Oyama et al.	May 2001	B1
6250812	Ueda et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6258182	Schetky et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6284071	Suzuki et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6332935	Gorman et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6334350	Shin et al.	Jan 2002	B1
6334912	Ganin et al.	Jan 2002	B1
6384388	Anderson et al.	May 2002	B1
6387197	Bewlay et al.	May 2002	B1
6391128	Ueda et al.	May 2002	B2
6399215	Zhu et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6402859	Ishii et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6409852	Lin et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6532786	Luttgeharm	Mar 2003	B1
6536110	Smith et al.	Mar 2003	B2
6539607	Fehring et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6539765	Gates	Apr 2003	B2
6558273	Kobayashi et al.	May 2003	B2
6561002	Okada et al.	May 2003	B2
6569270	Segal	May 2003	B2
6576068	Grubb et al.	Jun 2003	B2
6607693	Saito et al.	Aug 2003	B1
6632304	Oyama et al.	Oct 2003	B2
6632396	Tetjukhin et al.	Oct 2003	B1
6663501	Chen	Dec 2003	B2
6726784	Oyama et al.	Apr 2004	B2
6742239	Lee et al.	Jun 2004	B2
6764647	Aigner et al.	Jul 2004	B2
6773520	Fehring et al.	Aug 2004	B1
6786985	Kosaka et al.	Sep 2004	B2
6800153	Ishii et al.	Oct 2004	B2
6823705	Fukada et al.	Nov 2004	B2
6908517	Segal et al.	Jun 2005	B2
6918971	Fujii et al.	Jul 2005	B2
6932877	Raymond et al.	Aug 2005	B2
6939415	Iseda et al.	Sep 2005	B2
6971256	Okada et al.	Dec 2005	B2
7008491	Woodfield	Mar 2006	B2
7010950	Cai et al.	Mar 2006	B2
7032426	Durney et al.	Apr 2006	B2
7037389	Barbier et al.	May 2006	B2
7038426	Hill	May 2006	B2
7081173	Bahar et al.	Jul 2006	B2
7096596	Hernandez, Jr. et al.	Aug 2006	B2
7132021	Kuroda et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7152449	Durney et al.	Dec 2006	B2
7264682	Chandran	Sep 2007	B2
7269986	Pfaffmann et al.	Sep 2007	B2
7332043	Tetyukhin et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7410610	Woodfield et al.	Aug 2008	B2
7438849	Kuramoto et al.	Oct 2008	B2
7449075	Woodfield et al.	Nov 2008	B2
7536892	Amino et al.	May 2009	B2
7559221	Horita et al.	Jul 2009	B2
7601232	Fonte	Oct 2009	B2
7611592	Davis et al.	Nov 2009	B2
7708841	Saller et al.	May 2010	B2
7837812	Marquardt et al.	Nov 2010	B2
7879286	Miracle et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7947136	Saller	May 2011	B2
7984635	Callebaut et al.	Jul 2011	B2
8037730	Polen et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8043446	Jung et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8048240	Hebda et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8128764	Miracle et al.	Mar 2012	B2
8211548	Chun et al.	Jul 2012	B2
8316687	Slattery	Nov 2012	B2
8336359	Werz	Dec 2012	B2
8408039	Cao et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8430075	Qiao et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8454765	Saller et al.	Jun 2013	B2
8499605	Bryan	Aug 2013	B2
8551264	Kosaka et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8568540	Marquardt et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8578748	Huskamp et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8597442	Hebda et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8597443	Hebda et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8608913	Shim et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8613818	Forbes Jones et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8679269	Goller et al.	Mar 2014	B2
8919168	Valiev	Dec 2014	B2
9034247	Suzuki et al.	May 2015	B2
9327342	Oppenheimer et al.	May 2016	B2
9732408	Sanz et al.	Aug 2017	B2
20020033717	Matsuo	Mar 2002	A1
20030168138	Marquardt	Sep 2003	A1
20040099350	Manitone et al.	May 2004	A1
20040148997	Amino et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040221929	Hebda et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040250932	Briggs	Dec 2004	A1
20050047952	Coleman	Mar 2005	A1
20050145310	Bewlay et al.	Jul 2005	A1
20060045789	Nasserrafi et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060110614	Liimatainen	May 2006	A1
20060243356	Oikawa et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20070017273	Haug et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070098588	Narita et al.	May 2007	A1
20070193662	Jablokov et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070286761	Miracle et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080000554	Yaguchi et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080103543	Li et al.	May 2008	A1
20080107559	Nishiyama et al.	May 2008	A1
20080202189	Otaki	Aug 2008	A1
20080210345	Tetyukhin et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080264932	Hirota	Oct 2008	A1
20090000706	Huron et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090183804	Zhao et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090234385	Cichocki et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20110038751	Marquardt et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110180188	Bryan et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110183151	Yokoyama et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20120012233	Bryan	Jan 2012	A1
20120067100	Stefansson et al.	Mar 2012	A1
20120076611	Bryan	Mar 2012	A1
20120076612	Bryan	Mar 2012	A1
20120076686	Bryan	Mar 2012	A1
20120279351	Gu et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20120308428	Forbes Jones et al.	Dec 2012	A1
20130062003	Shulkin et al.	Mar 2013	A1
20130118653	Bryan et al.	May 2013	A1
20130156628	Forbes Jones et al.	Jun 2013	A1
20140060138	Hebda et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140076468	Marquardt et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140116582	Forbes Jones et al.	May 2014	A1
20140238552	Forbes Jones et al.	Aug 2014	A1
20140255719	Forbes Jones et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140260492	Thomas et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140261922	Thomas et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20150129093	Forbes Jones et al.	May 2015	A1
20160047024	Bryan	Feb 2016	A1
20160122851	Jones et al.	May 2016	A1
20160138149	Bryan	May 2016	A1
20170058387	Marquardt et al.	Mar 2017	A1
20170218485	Jones et al.	Aug 2017	A1
20170321313	Thomas et al.	Nov 2017	A1
20170349977	Jones et al.	Dec 2017	A1
20180016670	Bryan	Jan 2018	A1
20180073092	Jones et al.	Mar 2018	A1
20180195155	Biyan	Jul 2018	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (158)

Number	Date	Country
2787980	Jul 2011	CA
1070230	Mar 1993	CN
1194671	Sep 1998	CN
1403622	Mar 2003	CN
1816641	Aug 2006	CN
101104898	Jan 2008	CN
101205593	Jun 2008	CN
101294264	Oct 2008	CN
101684530	Mar 2010	CN
101637789	Jun 2011	CN
102212716	Oct 2011	CN
102816953	Dec 2012	CN
19743802	Mar 1999	DE
10128199	Dec 2002	DE
102010009185	Nov 2011	DE
0066361	Dec 1982	EP
0109350	May 1984	EP
0320820	Jun 1989	EP
0535817	Apr 1995	EP
0611831	Jan 1997	EP
0834580	Apr 1998	EP
0870845	Oct 1998	EP
0707085	Jan 1999	EP
0683242	May 1999	EP
0969109	Jan 2000	EP
1083243	Mar 2001	EP
1136582	Sep 2001	EP
1302554	Apr 2003	EP
1302555	Apr 2003	EP
1433853	Jun 2004	EP
1471158	Oct 2004	EP
1605073	Dec 2005	EP
1612289	Jan 2006	EP
1375690	Mar 2006	EP
1717330	Nov 2006	EP
1882752	Jan 2008	EP
2028435	Feb 2009	EP
2281908	Feb 2011	EP
1546429	Jun 2012	EP
2545104	Nov 1984	FR
847103	Sep 1960	GB
1170997	Nov 1969	GB
1345048	Jan 1974	GB
1433306	Apr 1976	GB
2151260	Jul 1985	GB
2198144	Jun 1988	GB
2337762	Dec 1999	GB
55-113865	Sep 1980	JP
57-62820	Apr 1982	JP
57-62846	Apr 1982	JP
S58-210158	Dec 1983	JP
60-046358	Mar 1985	JP
60-100655	Jun 1985	JP
S61-060871	Mar 1986	JP
S61-217564	Sep 1986	JP
S61-270356	Nov 1986	JP
62-109956	May 1987	JP
62-127074	Jun 1987	JP
62-149859	Jul 1987	JP
S62-227597	Oct 1987	JP
S62-247023	Oct 1987	JP
S63-49302	Mar 1988	JP
S63-188426	Aug 1988	JP
H01-272750	Oct 1989	JP
1-279736	Nov 1989	JP
2-205661	Aug 1990	JP
3-134124	Jun 1991	JP
H03-138343	Jun 1991	JP
H03-166350	Jul 1991	JP
H03-264618	Nov 1991	JP
H03-274238	Dec 1991	JP
4-74856	Mar 1992	JP
4-103737	Apr 1992	JP
4-143236	May 1992	JP
4-168227	Jun 1992	JP
5-59510	Mar 1993	JP
5-117791	May 1993	JP
5-195175	Aug 1993	JP
H05-293555	Nov 1993	JP
H06-93389	Apr 1994	JP
8-300044	Nov 1996	JP
9-143650	Jun 1997	JP
9-194969	Jul 1997	JP
9-215786	Aug 1997	JP
H10-128459	May 1998	JP
H10-306335	Nov 1998	JP
H11-21642	Jan 1999	JP
H11-309521	Nov 1999	JP
H11-319958	Nov 1999	JP
11-343528	Dec 1999	JP
11-343548	Dec 1999	JP
2000-153372	Jun 2000	JP
2000-234887	Aug 2000	JP
2001-71037	Mar 2001	JP
2001-081537	Mar 2001	JP
2001-343472	Dec 2001	JP
2002-69591	Mar 2002	JP
2002-146497	May 2002	JP
2003-55749	Feb 2003	JP
2003-74566	Mar 2003	JP
2003-285126	Oct 2003	JP
2003-334633	Nov 2003	JP
2004-131761	Apr 2004	JP
2005-281855	Oct 2005	JP
2007-291488	Nov 2007	JP
2007-327118	Dec 2007	JP
2008-200730	Sep 2008	JP
2009-138218	Jun 2009	JP
WO 2009142228	Nov 2009	JP
2009-299110	Dec 2009	JP
2009-299120	Dec 2009	JP
2010-70833	Apr 2010	JP
2012-140690	Jul 2012	JP
2015-54332	Mar 2015	JP
920004946	Jun 1992	KR
10-2005-0087765	Aug 2005	KR
10-2009-0069647	Jul 2009	KR
2003417	Nov 1993	RU
1131234	Oct 1994	RU
2156828	Sep 2000	RU
2197555	Jul 2001	RU
2172359	Aug 2001	RU
2217260	Nov 2003	RU
2234998	Aug 2004	RU
2269584	Feb 2006	RU
2288967	Dec 2006	RU
2364660	Aug 2009	RU
2368695	Sep 2009	RU
2378410	Jan 2010	RU
2392348	Jun 2010	RU
2393936	Jul 2010	RU
2441089	Jan 2012	RU
534518	Jan 1977	SU
631234	Nov 1978	SU
1077328	May 1982	SU
1135798	Jan 1985	SU
1088397	Feb 1991	SU
38805	May 2001	UA
40862	Aug 2001	UA
A200613448	Jun 2008	UA
WO 9817386	Apr 1998	WO
WO 9817836	Apr 1998	WO
WO 9822629	May 1998	WO
WO 0236847	May 2002	WO
WO 02070763	Sep 2002	WO
WO 02086172	Oct 2002	WO
WO 02090607	Nov 2002	WO
WO 2004101838	Nov 2004	WO
WO 2007084178	Jul 2007	WO
WO 2007114439	Oct 2007	WO
WO 2007142379	Dec 2007	WO
WO 2008017257	Feb 2008	WO
WO 2009082498	Jul 2009	WO
WO 2010084883	Jul 2010	WO
WO 2012063504	May 2012	WO
WO 2012147742	Nov 2012	WO
WO 2013081770	Jun 2013	WO
WO 2013130139	Sep 2013	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (425)

Entry
NPL: Salishchev et al Formation of sub-micro-crystalline structure in large size billets and sheets out of titanium alloys, report of Inst. For Metals super-plasticity problem, Ufa, Russia, Mar. 2004, total 49 pages, presentation slides. (Year: 2004).
Boyko et al., “Modeling of the Open-Die and Radial Forging Processes for Alloy 718”, Superalloys 718, 625 and Various Derivatives: Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Metallurgy and Applications of Superalloys 718, 625 and Various Derivatives, held Jun. 23, 1992, pp. 107-124.
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Jan. 30, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jan. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494.
Notice of Allowance dated May 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222.
Beal et al., “Forming of Titanium and Titanium Alloys—Cold Forming”, ASM Handbook, 2006, ASM International, Revised by ASM Committee on Forming Titanium Alloys, vol. 14B, 2 pages.
Bar definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 32.
Billet definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 40.
Cogging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 79.
Open die press forging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) pp. 298 and 343.
Thermomechanical working definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 480.
Ductility definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 131.
Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 24, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 6, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545.
“Allvac TiOsteum and TiOstalloy Beat Titanium Alloys”, printed from www.allvac.com/allvac/pages/Titanium/TiOsteum.htm on Nov. 7, 2005.
“Datasheet: Timetal 21S”, Alloy Digest, Advanced Materials and Processes (Sep. 1998), pp. 38-39.
“Heat Treating of Nonferrous Alloys: Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys,” Metals Handbook, ASM Handbooks Online (2002).
“Stryker Orthopaedics TMZF® Alloy (UNS R58120)”, printed from www.allvac.com/pages/Titanium/UNSR58120.htm on Nov. 7, 2005.
“Technical Data Sheet: Allvac® Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy” (dated Jun. 16, 2004).
“ASTM Designation F1801-97 Standard Practice for Corrosion Fatigue Testing of Metallic Implant Materials” ASTM International (1997) pp. 876-880.
“ASTM Designation F2066-01 Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R58150),” ASTM International (2000) pp. 1-4.
AL-6XN® Alloy (UNS N08367) Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, 2002, 56 pages.
Allegheny Ludlum, “High Performance Metals for Industry, High Strength, High Temperature, and Corrosion-Resistant Alloys”, (2000) pp. 1-8.
Allvac, Product Specification for “Allvac Ti-15 Mo,” available at http://www.allvac.com/allvac/pages/Titanium/Ti15MO.htm, last visited Jun. 9, 2003 p. 1 of 1.
Altemp® A286 Iron-Base Superalloy (UNS Designation S66286) Allegheny Ludlum Technical Data Sheet Blue Sheet, 1998, 8 pages.
ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 39.
ATI Datalloy 2 Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, ATI Allvac, Monroe, NC, SS-844, Version1, Sep. 17, 2010, 8 pages.
ATI 690 (UNS N06690) Nickel-Base, ATI Allvac, Oct. 5, 2010, 1 page.
Isothermal forging definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis ed., Fifth Printing, Jan. 2006, ASM International, p. 238.
Isothermal forging, printed from http://thelibraryofmanufacturing.com/isothermal_forging.html, accessed Jun. 5, 2013, 3 pages.
Adiabatic definition, ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis ed., Fifth Printing, Jan. 2006, ASM International, p. 9.
Adiabatic process—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, printed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_process, accessed May 21, 2013, 10 pages.
ASTM Designation F 2066-01, “Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R58150)”, May 2001, 7 pages.
ASTM Designation F 2066/F2066M-13, “Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-15 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R58150)”, Nov. 2013, 6 pages.
ATI 6-2-4-2™ Alloy Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Feb. 26, 2012, 4 pages.
ATI 6-2-4-6™ Titanium Alloy Data Sheet, accessed Jun. 26, 2012.
ATI 425, High-Strength Titanium Alloy, Alloy Digest, ASM International, Jul. 2004, 2 pages.
ATI 425® Alloy Applications, retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20100704044024/http://www.alleghenytechnologies.com/ATI425/applications/default.asp#other, Jul. 4, 2010, Way Back Machine, 2 pages.
ATI 425® Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20100703120218/http://www.alleghenytechnologies.com/ATI425/specifications/datasheet.asp, Jul. 3, 2010, Way Back Machine, 5 pages.
ATI 425®-MIL Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, May 28, 2010, pp. 1-5.
ATI 425®-MIL Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 2, Aug. 16, 2010, 5 pages.
ATI 425®-MIL Titanium Alloy, Mission Critical Metallics®, Version 3, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-4.
ATI 425® Titanium Alloy, Grade 38 Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Feb. 1, 2012, pp. 1-6.
ATI 500-MIL™, Mission Critical Metallics®, High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 4, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-4.
ATI 600-MIL®, Preliminary Draft Data Sheet, Ultra High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 4, Aug. 10, 2010, pp. 1-3.
ATI 600-MIL™, Preliminary Draft Data Sheet, Ultra High Hard Specialty Steel Armor, Version 3, Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-3.
ATI Aerospace Materials Development, Mission Critical Metallics, Apr. 30, 2008, 17 pages.
ATI Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy Technical Data Sheet, ATI Allvac, Monroe, NC, Mar. 21, 2008, 3 pages.
ATI Titanium 6Al—2Sn—4Zr—2Mo Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Sep. 17, 2010, pp. 1-3.
ATI Titanium 6Al—4V Alloy, Mission Critical Metallics®, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Apr. 22, 2010, pp. 1-3.
ATI Wah Chang, ATI™ 425 Titanium Alloy (Ti—4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe-0.2502), Technical Data Sheet, 2004, pp. 1-5.
ATI Wah Chang, Titanium and Titanium Alloys, Technical Data Sheet, 2003, pp. 1-16.
Beal et al., “Forming of Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Cold Forming”, ASM Handbook, 2006, ASM International, vol. 14B, 2 pages.
Bewlay, et al., “Superplastic roll forming of Ti alloys”, Materials and Design, 21, 2000, pp. 287-295.
Bowen, A. W., “Omega Phase Embrittlement in Aged Ti—15%Mo,” Scripta Metallurgica, vol. 5, No. 8 (1971) pp. 709-715.
Bowen, A. W., “On the Strengthening of a Metastable b-Titanium Alloy by w- and a-Precipitation” Royal Aircraft Establishment Technical Memorandum Mat 338, (1980) pp. 1-15 and Figs 1-5.
Boyer, Rodney R., “Introduction and Overview of Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Applications,” Metals Handbook, ASM Handbooks Online (2002).
Cain, Patrick, “Warm forming aluminum magnesium components; How it can optimize formability, reduce springback”, Aug. 1, 2009, from http://www.thefabricator.com/article/presstechnology/warm-forming-aluminum-magnesium-components, 3 pages.
Callister, Jr., William D., Materials Science and Engineering, An Introduction, Sixth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 180-184 (2003).
Desrayaud et al., “A novel high straining process for bulk materials—The development of a multipass forging system by compression along three axes”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 172, 2006, pp. 152-158.
DiDomizio, et al., “Evaluation of a Ni—20Cr Alloy Processed by Multi-axis Forging”, Materials Science Forum vols. 503-504, 2006, pp. 793-798.
Disegi, J. A., “Titanium Alloys for Fracture Fixation Implants,” Injury International Journal of the Care of the Injured, vol. 31 (2000) pp. S-D14-17.
Disegi, John, Wrought Titanium-15% Molybdenum Implant Material, Original Instruments and Implants of the Association for the Study of International Fixation—AO ASIF, Oct. 2003.
Donachie Jr., M.J., “Titanium A Technical Guide” 1988, ASM, pp. 39 and 46-50.
Duflou et al., “A method for force reduction in heavy duty bending”, Int. J. Materials and Product Technology, vol. 32, No. 4, 2008, pp. 460-475.
Elements of Metallurgy and Engineering Alloys, Editor F. C. Campbell, ASM International, 2008, Chapter 8, p. 125.
Fedotov, S.G. et al., “Effect of Aluminum and Oxygen on the Formation of Metastable Phases in Alloys of Titanium with .beta.-Stabilizing Elements”, Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Metally (1974) pp. 121-126.
Froes, F.H. et al., “The Processing Window for Grain Size Control in Metastable Beta Titanium Alloys”, Beta Titanium Alloys in the 80's, ed. by R. Boyer and H. Rosenberg, AIME, 1984, pp. 161-164.
Gigliotti et al., “Evaluation of Superplastically Roll Formed VT-25”, Titamium'99, Science and Technology, 2000, pp. 1581-1588.
Gilbert et al., “Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys—Solution Treating and Aging”, ASM Handbook, 1991, ASM International, vol. 4, pp. 1-8.
Greenfield, Dan L., News Release, ATI Aerospace Presents Results of Year-Long Characterization Program for New ATI 425 Alloy Titanium Products at Aeromat 2010, Jun. 21, 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1 page.
Harper, Megan Lynn, “A Study of the Microstructural and Phase Evolutions in Timetal 555”, Jan. 2001, retrieved from http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/send-pdf.cgi/harper%20megan%20lynn.pdf?acc_num=osu1132165471 on Aug. 10, 2009, 92 pages.
Hawkins, M.J. et al., “Osseointegration of a New Beta Titanium Alloy as Compared to Standard Orthopaedic Implant Metals,” Sixth World Biomaterials Congress Transactions, Society for Biomaterials, 2000, p. 1083.
Ho, W.F. et al., “Structure and Properties of Cast Binary Ti—Mo Alloys” Biomaterials, vol. 20 (1999) pp. 2115-2122.
Imatani et al., “Experiment and simulation for thick-plate bending by high frequency inductor”, ACTA Metallurgica Sinica, vol. 11, No. 6, Dec. 1998, pp. 449-455.
Imayev et al., “Formation of submicrocrystalline structure in TiAl intermetallic compound”, Journal of Materials Science, 27, 1992, pp. 4465-4471.
Imayev et al., “Principles of Fabrication of Bulk Ultrafine-Grained and Nanostructured Materials by Multiple Isothermal Forging”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 638-642, 2010, pp. 1702-1707.
Imperial Metal Industries Limited, Product Specification for “IMI Titanium 205”, The Kynoch Press (England) pp. 1-5. (1965).
Jablokov et al., “Influence of Oxygen Content on the Mechanical Properties of Titanium-35Niobium-7Zirconium-5Tantalum Beta Titanium Alloy,” Journal of ASTM International, Sep. 2005, vol. 2, No. 8, 2002, pp. 1-12.
Jablokov et al., “The Application of Ti-15 Mo Beta Titanium Alloy in High Strength Orthopaedic Applications”, Journal of ASTM International, vol. 2, Issue 8 (Sep. 2005) (published online Jun. 22, 2005).
Kovtun, et al., “Method of calculating induction heating of steel sheets during thermomechanical bending”, Kiev, Nikolaev, translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 5, pp. 105-110, May 1978, original article submitted Nov. 27, 1977, pp. 600-606.
Lampman, S., “Wrought and Titanium Alloys,” ASM Handbooks Online, ASM International, 2002.
Lee et al., “An electromagnetic and thermo-mechanical analysis of high frequency induction heating for steel plate bending”, Key Engineering Materials, vols. 326-328, 2006, pp. 1283-1286.
Lemons, Jack et al., “Metallic Biomaterials for Surgical Implant Devices,” BONEZone, Fall (2002) p. 5-9 and Table.
Long, M. et al., “Friction and Surface Behavior of Selected Titanium Alloys During Reciprocating-Sliding Motion”, WEAR, 249(1-2), Jan. 17, 2001, 158-168.
Lütjering, G. and J.C. Williams, Titanium, Springer, New York (2nd ed. 2007) p. 24.
Lutjering, G. and Williams, J.C., Titanium, Springer-Verlag, 2003, Ch. 5: Alpha+Beta Alloys, p. 177-201.
Marquardt et al., “Beta Titanium Alloy Processed for High Strength Orthopaedic Applications,” Journal of ASTM International, vol. 2, Issue 9 (Oct. 2005) (published online Aug. 17, 2005).
Marquardt, Brian, “Characterization of Ti—15Mo for Orthopaedic Applications,” TMS 2005 Annual Meeting: Technical Program, San Francisco, CA, Feb. 13-17, 2005 Abstract, p. 239.
Marquardt, Brian, “Ti—15Mo Beta Titanium Alloy Processed for High Strength Orthopaedic Applications,” Program and Abstracts for the Symposium on Titanium, Niobium, Zirconium, and Tantalum for Medical and Surgical Applications, Washington, D.C., Nov. 9-10, 2004 Abstract, p. 11.
Marte et al., “Structure and Properties of NI-20CR Produced by Severe Plastic Deformation”, Ultrafine Grained Materials IV, 2006, pp. 419-424.
Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, Eds. Boyer et al, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994, pp. 524-525.
Martinelli, Gianni and Roberto Peroni, “Isothermal forging of Ti-alloys for medical applications”, Presented at the 11th World Conference on Titanium, Kyoto, Japan, Jun. 4-7, 2007, accessed Jun. 5, 2013, 5 pages.
McDevitt, et al., Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of ATI 425 Alloy According to the Guidelines of the Metallic Materials Properties Development & Standardization Handbook, Aeromat 2010 Conference and Exposition: Jun. 20-24, 2010, Bellevue, WA, 23 pages.
Metals Handbook, Desk Edition, 2nd ed., J. R. Davis ed., ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio (1998), pp. 575-588.
Military Standard, Fastener Test Methods, Method 13, Double Shear Test, MIL-STD-1312-13, Jul. 26, 1985, superseding MIL-STD-1312 (in part) May 31, 1967, 8 pages.
Military Standard, Fastener Test Methods, Method 13, Double Shear Test, MIL-STD-1312-13A, Aug. 23, 1991, superseding MIL-STD-13, Jul. 26, 1985, 10 pages.
Murray, J.L., et al., Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, Second Edition, vol. 1, Ed. Massalski, Materials Park, OH; ASM International; 1990, p. 547.
Murray, J.L., The Mn—Ti (Manganese-Titanium) System, Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams, vol. 2, No. 3 (1981) p. 334-343.
Myers, J., “Primary Working, A lesson from Titanium and its Alloys,” ASM Course Book 27 Lesson, Test 9, Aug. 1994, pp. 3-4.
Naik, Uma M. et al., “Omega and Alpha Precipitation in Ti—15Mo Alloy,” Titanium '80 Science and Technology—Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Titanium, H. Kimura & O. Izumi Eds. May 19-22, 1980 pp. 1335-1341.
Nguyen et al., “Analysis of bending deformation in triangle heating of steel plates with induction heating process using laminated plate theory”, Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 37, 2009, pp. 228-246.
Nishimura, T. “Ti—15Mo—5Zr—3Al”, Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, eds. R. Boyer et al., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994, p. 949.
Nutt, Michael J. et al., “The Application of Ti-15 Beta Titanium Alloy in High Strength Structural Orthopaedic Applications,” Program and Abstracts for the Symposium on Titanium Niobium, Zirconium, and Tantalum for Medical and Surgical Applications, Washington, D.C., Nov. 9-10, 2004 Abstract, p. 12.
Nyakana, et al., “Quick Reference Guide for β Titanium Alloys in the 00s”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 14, No. 6, Dec. 1, 2005, pp. 799-811.
Pennock, G.M. et al., “The Control of a Precipitation by Two Step Ageing in β Ti—15Mo,” Titanium '80 Science and Technology—Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Titanium, H. Kimura & O. Izumi Eds. May 19-22, 1980 pp. 1344-1350.
Prasad, Y.V.R.K. et al. “Hot Deformation Mechanism in Ti—6Al—4V with Transformed B Starting Microstructure: Commercial v. Extra Low Interstitial Grade”, Materials Science and Technology, Sep. 2000, vol. 16, pp. 1029-1036.
Qazi, J.I. et al., “High-Strength Metastable Beta-Titanium Alloys for Biomedical Applications,” JOM, Nov. 2004 pp. 49-51.
Roach, M.D., et al., “Comparison of the Corrosion Fatigue Characteristics of CPTi-Grade 4, Ti—6A1—4V ELI, Ti—6A1-7 Nb, and Ti-15 Mo”, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 2, Issue 7, (Jul./Aug. 2005) (published online Jun. 8, 2005).
Roach, M.D., et al., “Physical, Metallurgical, and Mechanical Comparison of a Low-Nickel Stainless Steel,” Transactions on the 27th Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Apr. 24-29, 2001, p. 343.
Roach, M.D., et al., “Stress Corrosion Cracking of a Low-Nickel Stainless Steel,” Transactions of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, 2001, p. 469.
Rudnev et at., “Longitudinal flux indication heating of slabs, bars and strips is no longer “Black Magic:” II”, Industrial Heating, Feb. 1995, pp. 46-48 and 50-51.
Russo, P.A., “Influence of Ni and Fe on the Creep of Beta Annealed Ti-6242S”, Titanium '95: Science and Technology, pp. 1075-1082.
SAE Aerospace Material Specification 4897A (issued Jan. 1997, revised Jan. 2003).
SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy Bars, Forgings and Forging Stock, 6.0Al—4.0V Annealed, AMS 6931A, Issued Jan. 2004, Revised Feb. 2007, pp. 1-7.
SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy Bars, Forgings and Forging Stock, 6.0Al—4.0V, Solution Heat Treated and Aged, AMS 6930A, Issued Jan. 2004, Revised Feb. 2006, pp. 1-9.
SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate, 4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe, Annealed, AMS 6946A, Issued Oct. 2006, Revised Jun. 2007, pp. 1-7.
Salishchev et al., “Characterization of Submicron-grained Ti—6Al-4V Sheets with Enhanced Superplastic Properties”, Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, vols. 447-448, 2004, pp. 441-446.
Salishchev et al., “Mechanical Properties of Ti—6Al—4V Titanium Alloy with Submicrocrystalline Structure Produced by Multiaxial Forging”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 584-586, 2008, pp. 783-788.
Salishchev, et al., “Effect of Deformation Conditions on Grain Size and Microstructure Homogeneity of β-Rich Titanium Alloys”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 14(6), Dec. 2005, pp. 709-716.
Salishchev, G.A., “Formation of submicrocrystalline structure in large size billets and sheets out of titanium alloys”, Institute for Metals Superplasticity Problems,Ufa, Russia, presented at 2003 NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Kyiv, Ukraine, Sep. 9-13, 2003, 50 pages.
Semiatin, S.L. et al., “The Thermomechanical Processing of Alpha/Beta Titanium Alloys,” Journal of Metals, Jun. 1997, pp. 33-39.
Semiatin et al., “Equal Channel Angular Extrusion of Difficult-to-Work Alloys”, Materials & Design, Elsevier Science Ltd., 21, 2000, pp. 311-322.
Semiatin et al., “Alpha/Beta Heat Treatment of a Titanium Alloy with a Nonuniform Microstructure”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 38A, Apr. 2007, pp. 910-921.
Shahan et al., “Adiabatic shear bands in titanium and titanium alloys: a critical review”, Materials & Design, vol. 14, No. 4, 1993, pp. 243-250.
SPS Titanium™ Titanium Fasteners, SPS Technologies Aerospace Fasteners, 2003, 4 pages.
Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56400), Designation: F 1472-99, ASTM 1999, pp. 1-4.
Takemoto Y et al., “Tensile Behavior and Cold Workability of Ti—Mo Alloys”, Materials Transactions Japan Inst. Metals Japan, vol. 45, No. 5, May 2004, pp. 1571-1576.
Tamarisakandala, S. et al., “Strain-induced Porosity During Cogging of Extra-Low Interstitial Grade Ti—6Al—4V”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 10(2), Apr. 2001, pp. 125-130.
Tamirisakandala et al., “Effect of boron on the beta transus of Ti—6Al—4V alloy”, Scripta Materialia, 53, 2005, pp. 217-222.
Tamirisakandala et al., “Powder Metallurgy Ti—6Al—4V-xB Alloys: Processing, Microstructure, and Properties”, JOM, May 2004, pp. 60-63.
Tebbe, Patrick A. and Ghassan T. Kridli, “Warm forming aluminum alloys: an overview and future directions”, Int. J. Materials and Product Technology, vol. 21, Nos. 1-3, 2004, pp. 24-40.
Technical Presentation: Overview of MMPDS Characterization of ATI 425 Alloy, 2012, 1 page.
TIMET 6-6-2 Titanium Alloy (Ti—6Al—6V—2Sn), Annealed, accessed Jun. 27, 2012.
TIMET TIMETAL® 6-2-4-2 (Ti—6Al—2Sn—4Zr—2Mo—0.08Si) Titanium Alloy datasheet, accessed Jun. 26, 2012.
TIMET TIMETAL® 6-2-4-6 Titanium Alloy (Ti—6Al—2Sn—4Zr—6Mo), Typical, accessed Jun. 26, 2012.
Tokaji, Keiro et al., “The Microstructure Dependence of Fatigue Behavior in Ti—15Mo—5Zr—3Al Alloy,” Materials Science and Engineering A., vol. 213 (1996) pp. 86-92.
Two new α-β titanium alloys, KS Ti-9 for sheet and KS EL-F for forging, with mechanical properties comparable to Ti—6Al—4V, Oct. 8, 2002, ITA 2002 Conference in Orlando, Hideto Oyama, Titanium Technology Dept., Kobe Steel, Ltd., 16 pages.
Veeck, S., et al., “The Castability of Ti-5553 Alloy,” Advanced Materials and Processes, Oct. 2004, pp. 47-49.
Weiss, I. et al., “The Processing Window Concept of Beta Titanium Alloys”, Recrystallization '90, ed. by T. Chandra, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1990, pp. 609-616.
Weiss, I. et al., “Thermomechanical Processing of Beta Titanium Alloys—An Overview,” Material Science and Engineering, A243, 1998, pp. 46-65.
Williams, J., Thermo-mechanical processing of high-performance Ti alloys: recent progress and future needs, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 117 (2001), p. 370-373.
Zardiackas, L.D. et al., “Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of Titanium Implant Materials,” Transactions of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, (2001).
Zeng et al., Evaluation of Newly Developed Ti-555 High Strength Titanium Fasteners, 17th AeroMat Conference & Exposition, May 18, 2006, 2 pages.
Zhang et al., “Simulation of slip band evolution in duplex Ti—6Al—4V”, Acta Materialia, vol. 58, (2010), Nov. 26, 2009, pp. 1087-1096.
Zherebtsov et al., “Production of submicrocrystalline structure in large-scale Ti—6Al—4V billet by warm severe deformation processing”, Scripta Materialia, 51, 2004, pp. 1147-1151.
Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate 4Al—2.5V—1.5Fe, Annealed, AMS6946 Rev. B, Aug. 2010, SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, 7 pages.
Titanium Alloy, Sheet, Strip, and Plate 6Al—4V, Annealed, AMS 4911L, Jun. 2007, SAE Aerospace, Aerospace Material Specification, 7 pages.
E112-12 Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size, ASTM International, Jan. 2013, 27 pages.
ATI Datalloy 2 Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, ATI Properties, Inc., Version 1, Jan. 24, 2013, 6 pages.
ATI AL-6XN® Alloy (UNS N08367), ATI Allegheny Ludlum, 2010, 59 pages.
ATI 800™/ATI 800H™/ATI 800AT™ ATI Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloys (UNS N08800/N08810/N08811), 2012 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 9, 2012, 7 pages.
ATI 825™ Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N08825), 2013 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 2, Mar. 8, 2013, 5 pages.
ATI 625™ Alloy Technical Data Sheet, High Strength Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N06625), Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 4, 2012, 3 pages.
ATI 600™ Technical Data Sheet, Nickel-base Alloy (UNS N06600), 2012 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 19, 2012, 5 pages.
Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,348.
Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598.
Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598.
Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598.
Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/434,598.
Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160.
Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 20, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/448,160.
Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Interview summary dated Apr. 14, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/057,614.
Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Interview summary dated Jun. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Interview summary dated Jun. 15, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Interview summary dated Jan. 6, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 27, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,189.
Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Advisory Action dated Jan. 25, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review dated Mar. 28, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Advisory Action dated Nov. 29, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action dated May 31, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/911,947.
Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789.
Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789.
Advisory Action dated Oct. 7, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,789.
Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/888,699.
Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674.
Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674.
Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/845,122.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 17, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/845,122.
Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,046.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,046.
Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,143.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 2, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,143.
Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494.
Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494.
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 5, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/150,494.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066, filed Feb. 26, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/331,135, filed Dec. 20, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285, filed Mar. 11, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196, filed Mar. 15, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,545, filed Mar. 15, 2013.
Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538.
Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/882,538.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222, filed Mar. 15, 2013.
Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,222.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699, filed Nov. 12, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,759, filed Nov. 19, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029, filed Nov. 6, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707, filed Dec. 2, 2013.
ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, “Blasting or Blast Cleaning,” J.R. Davis Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH (1992) p. 42.
Buijk, A., “Open-Die Forging Simulation”, Forge Magazine, Dec. 1, 2013, 5 pages.
Herring, D., “Grain Size and Its Influence on Materials Properties”, IndustrialHeating.com, Aug. 2005, pp. 20 and 22.
INCONEL® alloy 600, Special Metals Corporation, www.specialmetals.com, Sep. 2008, 16 pages.
Yaylaci et al., “Cold Working & Hot Working & Annealing”, http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tri˜selis/teaching/WEBkmu479/Ppt/kmu479Presentations2010/Cold_Hot_Working_Annealing.pdf, 2010, 41 pages.
Superaustenitic, http://www.atimetals.com/products/Pages/superaustenitic.aspx, Nov. 9, 2015, 3 pages.
French, D., “Austenitic Stainless Steel”, The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors Bulletin, 1992, 3 pages.
Acom Magazine, outokumpu, NACE International, Feb. 2013, 16 pages.
ATI A286™ Iron Based Superalloy (UNS S66286) Technical Data Sheet, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Apr. 17, 2012, 9 pages.
ATI A286™ (UNS S66286) Technical Data Sheet, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Mar. 14, 2012, 3 pages.
Corrosion-Resistant Titanium, Technical Data Sheet, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Feb. 29, 2012, 5 pages.
ATI 3-2.5™ Titanium (Ti Grade 9) Technical Data Sheet, ATI Wah Chang, 2010, 4 pages.
Grade 9 Ti 3Al 2.5V Alloy (UNS R56320), Jul. 30, 2013, http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=9337, 3 pages.
ATI Ti—6Al—4V, Grade 5, Titanium Alloy (UNS R56400) Technical Data Sheet, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, Version 1, Jan. 31, 2012, 4 pages.
Panin et al., “Low-cost Titanium Alloys for Titanium-Polymer Layered Compisites”, 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, Sep. 7, 2014, 4 pages.
Grade Ti—4.5Al—3V—2Mo—2Fe Alloy, Jul. 9, 2013, http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=9448, 2 pages.
Garside et al., “Mission Critical Metallics® Recent Developments in High-Strength Titanium Fasteners for Aerospace Applications”, ATI, 2013, 21 pages.
Foltz et al., “Recent Developments in High-Strength Titanium Fasteners for Aerospace Applications”, ATI, Oct. 22, 2014, 17 pages.
Kosaka et al., “Superplastic Forming Properties of TIMETAL® 54M”, Henderson Technical Laboratory, Titanium Metals Corporation, ITA, Oct. 2010, Orlando, Florida, 18 pages.
ATI Datalloy HP™ Alloy, UNS N08830, Technical Data Sheet Version 1, Apr. 14, 2015, 6 pages.
ATI Datalloy 2® Alloy, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Feb. 20, 2014, 6 pages.
Handa, Sukhdeep Singh, “Precipitation of Carbides in a Ni-based Superalloy”, Degree Project for Master of Science with Specialization in Manufacturing Department of Engineering Science, University West, Jun. 30, 2014, 42 pages.
Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Notice of Abandonment mailed Jan. 29, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Mar. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707.
Notice of Third-Party Submission dated Dec. 16, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941, filed Nov. 23, 2015.
Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,759.
Office Action dated May 6, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,759.
Titanium Alloy Guide, RMI Titanium Company, Jan. 2000, 45 pages.
Wanhill et al, “Chapter 2, Metallurgy and Microstructure”, Fatigue of Beta Processed and Beta Heat-treated Titanium Alloys, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, 2012, pp. 5-10.
Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys, http://www.totalmateria.com/Article97.htm, Apr. 2004, 5 pages.
Grade 6Al 2Sn 4Zr 6Mo Titanium Alloy (UNS R56260), AZoM, http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=9305, Jun. 20, 2013, 4 pages.
Gammon et al., “Metallography and Microstructures of Titanium and Its Alloys”, ASM Handbook, vol. 9: Metallography and Microstructures, ASM International, 2004, pp. 899-917.
Rui-gang Deng, et al. “Effects of Forging Process and Following Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of TC11 Titanium Alloy,” Materials for Mechanical Engineering, vol. 35. No. 11, Nov. 2011, 5 pages. (English abstract included).
Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Aug. 22, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Aug. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief dated Oct. 27, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Jun. 15, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029.
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Jun. 10, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707.
Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707.
Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Advisory Action dated Nov. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,759.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,140, filed Nov. 10, 2016.
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,750.
Srinivasan et al., “Rolling of Plates and Sheets from As-Cast Ti—8Al—4V-0.1 B”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 18.4, Jun. 2009, pp. 390-398.
Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Advisory Action dated Mar. 7, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Office Action dated May 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 27, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Mar. 1, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707.
Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review dated Feb. 27, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281.
Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 28, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,750.
Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300.
Office Action dated May 25, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300.
ATI 38-644™ Beta Titanium Alloy Technical Data Sheet, UNS R58640, Version 1, Dec. 21, 2011, 4 pages.
ATI 425® Alloy, Grade 38, Titanium Alloy, UNS R54250, Technical Data Sheet, Version 1, Nov. 25, 2013, pp. 1-6.
Beal et al., “Forming of Titanium and Titanium Alloys—Cold Forming”, ASM Handbook, 2006, vol. 14B, pp. 656-669.
Craighead et al., “Ternary Alloys of Titanium”, Journal of Metals, Mar. 1950, Transactions AIME, vol. 188, pp. 514-538.
Craighead et al., “Titanium Binary Alloys”, Journal of Metals. Mar. 1950, Transactions AIME, vol. 188, pp. 485-513.
Diderrich et al., “Addition of Cobalt to the Ti—6Al—4V Alloy”, Journal of Metals, May 1968, pp. 29-37.
Donachie Jr., M.J., “Heat Treating Titanium and Its Alloys”, Heat Treating Process, Jun./Jul. 2001, pp. 47-49, 52-53, and 56-57.
Glazunov et al., Structural Titanium Alloys, Moscow, Metallurgy, 1974, pp. 264-283.
Hsieh, Chih-Chun and Weite Wu, “Overview of Intermetallic Sigma Phase Precipitation in Stainless Steels”, ISRN Metallurgy, vol. 2012, 2012, pp. 1-16.
Novikov et al., 17.2.2 Deformable (α+β) alloys, Chapter 17, Titanium and its Alloys, Metal Science, vol. II Thermal Treatment of the Alloy, Physical Matallurgy, 2009, pp. 357-360.
Swann, P.R. and J. G. Parr, “Phase Transformations in Titanium-Rich Alloys of Titanium and Cobalt”, Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME, Apr. 1958, pp. 276-279.
Ti—6Al—4V, Ti64, 6Al—4V, 6-4, UNS R56400, 1 page.
Titanium 3Al—8V—6Cr—4Mo—4Zr Beta-C/Grade 19 UNS R58640, 2 pages.
Yakymyshyn et al., “The Relationship between the Constitution and Mechanical Properties of Titanium-Rich Alloys of Titanium and Cobalt”, 1961, vol. 53, pp. 283-294.
AFML-TR-76-80 Development of Titanium Alloy Casting Technology, Aug. 1976, 5 pages.
Valiev et al., “Nanostructured materials produced by sever plastic deformation”, Moscow, LOGOS, 2000.
Li et al., “The optimal determination of forging process parameters for Ti—6.5Al—3.5Mo—1.52r—0.3Si alloy with thick lamellar microstructure in two phase field based on P-map”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 210, Issue 2, Jan. 19, 2010, pp. 370-377.
Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Advisory Action dated May 18, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/885,620.
Office Action dated May 27, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674.
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary dated Sep. 1, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 25, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/838,674.
Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285.
Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Oct. 20, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,285.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300, filed Jan. 12, 2015.
Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465.
Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465.
Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Sep. 29, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465.
Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Oct. 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,465.
Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029.
Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,707.
Markovsky, P. E., “Preparation and properties of ultrafine (submicron) structure titanium alloys”, Materials Science and Engineering, 1995, A203, 4 pages.
Gil et al., “Formation of alpha-Widmanstatten structure: effects of grain size and cooling rate on the Widmanstatten morphologies and on the mechanical properties in Ti6Al4V alloy”, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 329, 2001, pp. 142-152.
Enayati et al., “Effects of temperature and effective strain on the flow behavior of Ti-6AI-4V”, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 348, 2011, pp. 2813-2822.
Longxian et al., “Wear-Resistant Coating and Performance Titanium and Its Alloy, and properties thereof”, Northeastern University Press, Dec. 2006, pp. 26-28, 33.
“Acceleration and Improvement for Heat Treating Workers,” Quick Start and Improvement for Heat Treatment, ed. Yang Man, China Machine Press, Apr. 2008, pp. 265-266.
Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Advisory Action dated Aug. 7, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Decision on Appeal dated Dec. 15, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief dated Jul. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 20, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/777,066.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 20, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,196.
Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 7, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029.
Notice of Allowability dated Sep. 21, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/073,029.
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Interview Summary dated Mar. 12, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 9, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,281.
Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300.
Advisory Action dated Jan. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300.
Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300.
Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,985.
Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,985.
Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941.
Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941.
Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/881,633.
Forging Machinery, Dies, Processes, Metals Handbook Desk Edition, ASM International, 1998, pp. 839-863.
Smith et al., “Types of Heat-Treating Furnaces,” Heat Treating, ASM Handbook, ASM International, 1991, vol. 4, p. 465-474
Concise Explanation for Third Party Preissuance submission under Rule 1.290 filed in U.S. Appl. No. 15/678,527 on Jun. 5, 2018.
Guidelines for PWR Steam Generator Tubing Specifications and Repair, Electric Power Research Institute, Apr. 14, 1999, vol. 2, Revision 1, 74 pages. (accessed at https://www.epri.co.rn/#/pages/product/TR-016743-V2R1/).
Materials Reliability Program: Guidelines for Thermally Treated Alloy 690 Pressure Vessel Nozzels, (MRP-241), Electric Power Research Institute, Jul. 25, 2008, 51 pages. (accessed at https://www.epri.com/#/pages/product/1015007/).
Microstructure Etching and Carbon Analysis Techniques, Electric Power Research Institute, May 1, 1990, 355 pages. (accessed at https://www.epri.com/#/pages/product/NP-6720-SD/).
Frodigh, John, “Some Factors Affecting the Appearance of the Microstructure in Alloy 690”, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, American Nuclear Society, Inc., vol. 1, Aug. 10. 1997, 12 pages.
Kajimura et al., “Corrosion Resistance of TT Alloy 690 Manufactured by Various Melting Processes in High Temperature NaOH Solution”, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, American Nuclear Society, Inc., vol. 1, Aug. 10, 1997, pp. 149-156.
The Japan Society for Heat Treatment, Introduction of Heat Treatment, Japan, Minoru, Kanai, Jan. 10, 1974, p. 150.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 20, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,952.
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,851.
Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,045.
Office Action dated Jul. 17. 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Office Action dated May 8, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,699.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/594,300.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 15, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,985.
Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941.
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary dated Jan. 30, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941.
Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941.
Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,941.
Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/881,633.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/881,633.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated May 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/881,633.
Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 22, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443.
Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 27, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Sep. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443.
Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 11, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 18, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/433,443.
Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/678,527.
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 13, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/678,527.
Corrected Notice of Alloability dated Apr. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/678,527.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,174, filed Sep. 5, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/122,450, filed Sep. 5, 2018.
Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2019 U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,661.
Notice of Allowance dated May 22, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/559,661.
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated May 29, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/659,661.
Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2019 in U.S Appl. No. 15/348,140.
Notice of Allowance dated May 9, 2019 in U.S Appl. No. 15/348,140.
Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2019 in U.S Appl. No. 15/816,128.
Angeliu et al, “Behavior of Grain Boundary Chemistry and Precipitates upon Thermal Treatment of Controlled Purity Alloy 690”, Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 21A, Aug. 1990, pp. 2097-2107.
Park et al., “Effect of heat treatment on fatigue crack growth rate of Inconel 690 and Inconel 600”, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 231, 1996, pp. 204-212.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20140076471 A1	Mar 2014	US

Continuations (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	12882538	Sep 2010	US
Child	14028588		US

Processing routes for titanium and titanium alloys

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract