Patent Application
20200250763
Government agencies and securities exchanges require that certain information on a security be made available to an investor before the security may be sold to the investor, and that certain information be delivered to the investor with the confirmation of any transaction. The delivery of this information has historically taken place either in person, or via document delivery services, such as the U.S. Mail, Federal Express, or United Parcel Service. Recently, government agencies and securities exchanges have begun allowing securities issuers and intermediaries to comply with information delivery requirements by approving the delivery of the information in an electronic format, for example, by transmitting the information from one computer to another over a computer network.
Securities information is available in various electronic databases, including the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's (“SEC's”) EDGAR database. EDGAR, the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system, performs automated collection, validation, indexing, acceptance, and forwarding of submissions by companies and others that are required by law to file information with the SEC. The primary purpose of EDGAR is to increase the efficiency and fairness of the securities market for the benefit of investors, corporations, and the economy by accelerating the receipt, acceptance, dissemination, and analysis of time-sensitive corporate information filed with the agency. EDGAR information is available on the Internet at www.sec.gov.
Although securities information is available from databases like EDGAR, the information is not provided in a useful electronic format that enables compliance with government and securities exchange regulations, especially with regard to mutual funds and other non-corporate securities. EDGAR, as a result of its design, makes information regarding non-corporate securities difficult to find. In EDGAR, mutual fund information, for example, is listed as a submission of the corporate issuer, not the fund name that is marketed to the consumer, and one submission may include information for more than one mutual fund. EDGAR submissions also may include updates and amendments to earlier submitted information. It is quite possible for a single mutual fund to have more than fifty amendments to its compliance information. An investor attempting to locate the complete set of compliance information for a mutual fund directly from EDGAR would need to retrieve all applicable amendments. This is time-consuming, and it is difficult for the investor, when attempting to gather compliance information from EDGAR, to know if all the amendments have actually been located, if the retrieved information about the fund is complete, or if the retrieved information is up-to-date.
Some embodiments of the invention provide a computer-implemented method of processing a body of data representing a prospectus issued for at least one mutual fund. The method comprises: (A) locating, within the body of data, one or more data elements each having at least one attribute within a predefined set of attributes; (B) inserting one or more markers into the body of data to indicate the presence of the data element(s) located in (A); (C) using the marker(s) inserted in (B), generating a representation of the prospectus; and (D) making the representation of the prospectus available for a recipient to access.
Other embodiments of the invention provide a computer-implemented method of providing information relating to at least one mutual fund to a user. The method comprises: (A) processing data representing a statutory prospectus issued for the at least one mutual fund to retrieve one or more data elements, each satisfying predefined attributes, from the data, the data representing the statutory prospectus including detailed information corresponding to each of the one or more data elements; (B) generating a summary prospectus comprising the one or more data elements; and (C) making the summary prospectus available to the user in a form that enables access to the detailed information corresponding to each of the one or more data elements.
Still other embodiments of the invention provide a computer-implemented method of providing information relating to at least one mutual fund. The method comprises: (A) making available to a user a representation of a statutory prospectus for the at least one mutual fund, the statutory prospectus comprising detailed information for the at least one mutual fund, the representation of the statutory prospectus comprising one or more data elements found within the statutory prospectus, each of the one or more data elements corresponding to a portion of the detailed information, the representation of the statutory prospectus being made available to the user in a form which enables the user access to the detailed information corresponding to each of the one or more data elements.
Still other embodiments of the present invention provide a computer-implemented method of processing data representing a statutory prospectus for at least one mutual fund and a summary prospectus corresponding to the statutory prospectus. The method comprises: (A) identifying, within the data representing the summary prospectus, one or more data elements, each having at least one attribute within a predefined set of attributes; (B) locating, within the data representing the statutory prospectus, one or more portions comprising detailed information, each portion comprising detailed information which corresponds to one of the one or more data elements; (C) inserting, within the data representing the summary prospectus, at least one reference for each data element located in (A), wherein each reference for a data element is to a portion corresponding to the data element located in (B); and (D) enabling a user to employ a reference inserted in (C) to access a portion of the data located in (B) corresponding to a data element.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Various embodiments of the invention provide capabilities designed to improve the clarity of disclosure materials provided by securities issuers to investors, by enabling securities issuers and/or intermediaries (e.g., broker/dealers, other distributors, etc.) to create and disseminate clear, concise summary-level information on individual securities to investors and potential investors (hereinafter collectively referred to as “investors” for simplicity and convenience), so as to enable investors to make informed investment decisions.
This information may include, for example, a summary version of the full statutory prospectus which all securities issuers are required to provide to investors. This summary version is referred to herein as a “summary prospectus.” In some embodiments, a summary prospectus may include a concise, “plain English” synopsis and/or representation of certain information contained in the full statutory prospectus (to which the summary prospectus may, in some embodiments, be a counterpart), such as a security's investment objectives and strategies, costs, and risks, etc. Information in the summary prospectus may be presented in a standardized sequence (e.g., defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission), with certain key information being presented in individual sections. In addition to a concise synopsis and/or representation of key information, the summary prospectus may indicate to the investor where more detailed information on each topic addressed in the summary prospectus may be found, such as via references to locations in the full statutory prospectus and/or other documents, so that it facilitates a “layered disclosure” of information about the security, with information in the summary prospectus forming a first layer and information in underlying detailed documents forming further layers.
In some embodiments, a summary prospectus may be disseminated at least in part via the Internet (e.g., via email, presented on a web page, etc.) to facilitate the layered disclosure of information on one or more securities to investors. For example, a hard copy summary prospectus delivered to an investor may include a reference (e.g., a Uniform Resource Locator, or URL) to a web page presenting an online version of the summary prospectus which largely replicates the standardized order in which information is presented by the hard copy summary prospectus. Each section of the online version of the summary prospectus may include one or more links to more detailed information on the summary-level information on a given topic presented in the section. For example, each link may reference a location within an electronic version of the full statutory prospectus or another document. As such, the investor may readily navigate between sections of the summary prospectus and more detailed information provided within one or more other documents as desired. As a result, materials disclosing important information about the security may be made more accessible and user-friendly to the investor, as well as to intermediaries, financial analysts and other users, enabling these parties to more easily compare different securities across one or more dimensions, and thereby make more informed investment decisions.
An example format for a summary prospectus and corresponding online version are depicted in
Summary prospectus 100 also includes URL 112, which in the embodiment depicted references an online version of the summary prospectus which provides an investor with access to more detailed information on the security. If summary prospectus 100 is provided to the investor in hard copy, printed form, then the investor may enter the URL into the address bar provided by a browser program (not shown) to access the online version. If summary prospectus 100 is provided to the investor in electronic form (e.g., in an electronic document e-mailed to the investor), then the URL may be “clickable” by the investor to bring the investor to the online version.
An example online version 200 of summary prospectus 100 is shown in
In example online version 200, each of sections 203-211 includes the same information as is presented in the corresponding section of summary prospectus 100, as well as a link (e.g., a hypertext link) to more detailed information regarding the considered topic. For example, section 204 includes information on the security's fees and expenses, and includes link 214 which references more detailed information on the security's fees and expenses, which (in this example) is included within an electronic version of a full statutory prospectus 250 for the security, which includes information on discounts and/or exemptions for inventors who satisfy certain criteria. By clicking link 214, the investor is taken to location 251 within the statutory prospectus which includes this detailed information, so that the investor may review the detailed information before deciding whether to invest in the security.
Of course, a link within an online version of a summary prospectus need not reference a statutory prospectus, as any suitable document(s) or information may be referenced. For example, section 209 includes information on the security's fund manager, and includes link 219 which references more detailed information on the fund's manager. If the investor notices that there has been a change to the security's fund manager since he/she last reviewed disclosure information (e.g., the last statutory prospectus sent to the investor), he/she may click link 219, which in this example references a location within an electronic version of a supplement 260 (i.e., a “sticker”) to the prospectus. The supplement may have been issued after the last full statutory prospectus, and may provide more up-to-date detailed information regarding the new fund manager, such as his/her prior management experience and/or tenure at the securities issuer, than the last statutory prospectus.
It should be appreciated that a link within an online version of a summary prospectus need not reference a specific location within an underlying detailed document at which detailed information is contained. For example, a link may reference a table of contents in an underlying document (or other information) which indicates to the investor where information on a considered topic may be found, may reference a start of the document (allowing the investor to find the detailed information herself), or reference any other suitable location(s).
In example online version 200, each section includes a link to more detailed information. Thus, in this example, a user may click on link 213 to access detailed information on the security's investment objective, link 214 to access detailed information on its associated fees and expenses, link 215 to access detailed information on its principal investment strategies, link 216 to access detailed information on principal risks associated with its investments, link 217 to access detailed information on annual returns earned in prior periods, link 218 to access detailed information on its investment advisor, link 219 to access detailed information on its fund manager, link 220 to access detailed information on the purchase and sale of shares, dividends, capital gains and taxes, and link 221 to access detailed information on payments to broker/dealers and/or other intermediaries. It should be appreciated that an online version need not include a link in each section, no link, or more than one link, may be provided in a section of an online version. Embodiments of the invention are not limited to any particular implementation.
Using the links provided in online version 200 to access underlying detailed information, the investor may readily navigate between “layers” of disclosure on the security. In this respect, the disclosure in summary prospectus 100 may be considered as providing a first layer of information, including a concise synopsis of certain key information considered important to many investors. Using URL 112, the investor may access the second layer provided within online version 200, which may include much the same information as summary prospectus 100 but also enable access to underlying detailed information. Using the links provided in online version 200, the investor may access this detailed information, and move back and forth between detailed and summary-level information, thereby quickly and easily gaining access to information on the topic(s) that he/she considers most important when selecting a security for investment.
Some embodiments of the invention provide a system for making a summary prospectus and/or online version thereof available to investors. For example, when a securities issuer publishes a new summary prospectus for a security (e.g., by submitting it to EDGAR), embodiments may automatically acquire the summary prospectus document, process it to identify certain information contained therein, and prepare it for dissemination via any of various media. For example, processing the document to identify information contained therein may enable creation of an online version of the document, as well as logical associations between the information in the summary prospectus and corresponding detailed information provided in other documents (which may be similarly processed via embodiments of the invention to identify this detailed information and/or its location within the other documents). These logical associations may be used to create references (e.g., hypertext links) which are included within the online version, thereby enabling the user to accomplish the navigation between summary-level and detailed information described above.
Some embodiments of the invention provide an online facility with which not only an online version of a summary prospectus, but also other documents and materials relating to a considered security, may be made available to investors. For example, the online facility may provide access to a repository of documents disseminated over time by the issuer and/or distributors of the security. The facility may, for example, allow investors reviewing an online version of a summary prospectus (e.g., after entering a URL provided in a hard copy summary prospectus into a browser application) to readily determine whether more current information on the security (e.g., a newer summary prospectus, perhaps referenced by a URL in a newer hard copy summary prospectus than that which was reviewed by the investor) is available. In addition, the facility may allow the investor access to historical detail on the security.
Some embodiments of the invention may provide a capability to prepare a summary prospectus for dissemination in hard copy form. For example, some embodiments of the invention may provide a service provider with the capability to alter the aesthetic characteristics and/or content of a document submitted by a securities issuer to EDGAR, such as by adding branding elements or other visual enhancements supplied by the securities issuer and/or distributor, such as a broker/dealer through which the investor purchased the security. Some embodiments of the invention may also provide a capability to suppress the creation and/or delivery of certain versions of the summary prospectus (e.g., to suppress delivery to investors that previously received those versions). Aspects of these embodiments are discussed in greater detail below.
The sections which follow describe various systems and processes that enable the creation and/or dissemination of a summary prospectus, and underlying detailed documents, in online and hard copy form. For example, Section II describes systems and methods for identifying a summary prospectus published by a securities issuer and/or intermediary (e.g., to EDGAR) and storing the summary prospectus in a document repository. Section III describes systems and methods for processing the summary prospectus to identify certain information contained therein, and to create logical associations between this information and more detailed information provided in underlying documents. Section TV describes systems and methods for using these logical associations to create references between sections of an online version of a summary prospectus and corresponding information in other documents, which may allow an investor to navigate between the online version and the underlying documents as desired. Section V describes how these systems and methods described in Sections II-IV may be used to disseminate a summary prospectus and/or online version thereof to investors and/or other parties.
Commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,122,635, entitled “Mapping Compliance Information Into Useable Format,” filed Feb. 13, 1998, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses systems and methods which may be employed to acquire information from one or more databases (e.g., EDGAR), identify the information as comprising a statutory and/or summary prospectus document for a particular security, and create and store a computer-readable file containing the information for further processing. Relevant portions of the '635 patent are reproduced below for the reader's convenience.
A process 11 for acquiring, identifying and creating a computer-readable file representing compliance information (one example of which is a summary prospectus) is depicted in
In one aspect of the invention, the method 311 shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The acquisition subsystem 610 receives input from the securities submission sources 605 and other data sources 607. The securities information acquired by acquisition subsystem 610 is placed on a cataloging queue 630.
Cataloging subsystem 612 retrieves the securities information from the cataloging queue 630 and catalogs it. The cataloging subsystem 612 also receives as input, the securities information from the cataloging queue 630, as well as identification list 603, and other data 607. After cataloging, the securities information is placed on the splitting queue 632.
The splitting subsystem 614 retrieves the securities information from the splitting queue 632. After the splitting subsystem 614 determines start and end points of each item of compliance information in an item of securities information, the securities information is placed on the effective date queue 634.
The effective date subsystem 616 retrieves the securities information from the effective date queue 634, and determines an effective date for each item of compliance information (e.g., a summary prospectus) in the securities information. The compliance information is then placed on the quality assurance queue 636.
The quality assurance subsystem retrieves the securities information from the quality assurance queue 636. The compliance information is reviewed in the quality assurance subsystem 618, and then output from the obtainment system 600.
Referring to
By dividing the system 600 into multiple subsystems and queued input for each subsystem, the processing of the documents is divided up into sub-tasks. Multiple system operators can be assigned to one of the sub-tasks, and can therefore process securities information simultaneously. For example, if there are four system operators, the first system operator may process a first securities information document in the cataloging subsystem, a second system operator may process a second securities information document in the cataloging subsystem, a third system operator may process a third securities information document in the splitting subsystem, and a fourth system operator may process a fourth securities information document in the QA subsystem. Using multiple system operators allows for rapid processing of securities submissions through the system.
Acquisition subsystem 610 extracts files from the securities information source that contain securities information relevant to the subset of securities for which the user desires compliance information according to a process as shown in
As part of its service, EDGAR provides an index to the securities information added each day. In one aspect of the present invention, the acquisition subsystem 610 automatically acquires those documents that were added that day. The EDGAR index lists a central index key associated with each item of securities information. Acquisition subsystem 610 uses the EDGAR index to acquire the most recent information for a specific list of central index keys, step 710. The list of central index keys is determined from a list of securities, each of which has a unique identifier. For example, a list of securities identified by CUSIP number or stock ticker symbol may be mapped into a list of central index keys. Specific entries in the EDGAR index are identified, step 712, and then retrieved, step 714. The process then proceeds to step 708 as described above.
The cataloging subsystem 612 presents the system operator with the securities submissions that are relevant. The system operator inspects each submission and catalogs it according to the information contained within. Each submission may contain several items of compliance information. The system operator identifies the particular securities about which the submission contains compliance information.
Another aspect of the present invention scans the submission taken from the cataloging queue and searches for and identifies possible references to securities within the submission. The operator would then be directed to the locations of these identified securities within the submission in order to verity.
Any one or more of an internal identification number, CUSIP identifiers and stock ticker symbol may be used to identify a particular security. The internal identification number is unique for each security. A CUSIP number is a number assigned by Standard & Poor's CUSIP Service Bureau, the manager of the American Banking Association's CUSIP number system, to identify a security. A stock ticker symbol is a symbol assigned by a stock exchange to identify a security. An investor is most likely to reference a security, such as a mutual fund, by any one of: the fund name marketed to the consumer, the CUSIP number, or the stock ticker symbol, and not by the investment company name or the central index key.
For example, a section 800 of securities information acquired from the SEC EDGAR database is shown in
Operation of one example of a cataloging subsystem 612 is presented in
The cataloging section 1002 of the screen 1000 presents a list of cataloging choices as retrieved in step 904. Cataloging choices include possible CUSIP numbers or stock ticker symbols, the type of compliance information contained in the document (for example prospectus, statement of additional information (SAI), etc.), and the start line of each item of compliance information. As the system operator reviews the securities submission, the system operator selects the appropriate cataloging choices.
The operator, aided by the cataloging subsystem, compares the list of cataloging choices to the contents of the retrieved file, step 906. If a cataloging choice is located in the retrieved file, step 908, control passes to step 910. At step 910, the line number associated with the start of the identified cataloging choice is recorded. If the processing of the file is not complete, as determined in step 912, the process returns to step 906. If the file has completed processing, at step 914, a next file is retrieved from the cataloging queue and the process returns to step 902.
The splitting subsystem 614 determines the starting line and ending line of the compliance information that the system will use to extract compliance information from the securities submissions documents. For example, if the submission contains two SAIs, each for a different security, the starting and ending lines of the two items of compliance information will be associated with their respective security. The splitting subsystem presents the system operator with the securities submission and the catalog data for that submission. The system operator verifies the starting line and specifies the ending line of each item of compliance information. When the starting and ending line numbers of compliance information in the securities submission have been identified, the securities submission is then placed on the effective date queue.
In one embodiment, the splitting subsystem 614 is accessed at least two times for each securities submission by two different system operators. The starting and ending line numbers identified by the two system operators are compared in the quality assurance subsystem to confirm accuracy.
In one example of the system, the splitting subsystem 614 also determines whether the compliance information relates to, or is associated with, more than one security. For example, for a bundled product such as a variable annuity fund, an EDGAR filing may be related to more than one investment product. One item of compliance information may be applicable to many different investment products. This association, as determined in the splitting subsystem, is used later to associate the compliance information with the relevant securities. Alternatively, in other versions of the system, this association may occur in the cataloging subsystem 612, or the effective date subsystem 616.
Operation of one example of the splitting subsystem 614 is presented in
As shown in
The effective date is determined based on the type of securities submission. For example, if the securities submission contains a 497 or 485BPOS filing, then the prospectus date is generally the effective date. If the document is a 485APOS filing, then the filing date is the “Filed As Of Date.” The effective date is generally either the prospectus date or the filing date plus sixty days, whichever is later. If the prospectus registers a new series of stock, however, then the effective date is either the prospectus date or the filing date plus seventy-five days, whichever is later. If the prospectus date is incomplete, for example “January ______, 2008,” the operator can use his or her knowledge of applicable filing requirements to determine the effective date. For 497 and 485BPOS filings, for example, the filing date is the effective date, and for 485APOS, the effective date is sixty days after the filing date, unless it is registering new shares, in which case the effective date is seventy-five days after the filing date.
In one version of the system, the effective date subsystem 616 also determines if the compliance information is amending another item of compliance information. If it is an amendment, the compliance information is effective when the compliance information it is amending is effective. The effective date system sets the effective lifespan, i.e., a date the compliance information is effective and a date that it is no longer effective, to that of the amended compliance information. There are other relationships between submission types and effective dates that may be used to determine the effective date of a document being used as the basis for compliance information.
The quality assurance subsystem 618 is the final subsystem in the chain before the compliance information is output from the obtainment system. The quality assurance subsystem 618 aids an operator in the inspection of the compliance information. The system operator chooses, or is assigned, an item from the quality assurance queue, step 1302, as shown in
In the example in which the splitting subsystem 614 is accessed twice independently, the quality assurance system may compare the starting and ending lines specified by the previous two splitting subsystem 614 system operators for each item of compliance information. If any of the information for the retrieved item is not complete, step 1308, the system operator may place the securities submission on any of the queues for processing by a subsystem, step 1310. Of course, if the analysis determines that the processing should be repeated in more than one subsystem, the quality assurance system operator may choose to place the securities submission in the most “upstream” subsystem's queue. Once the system operator has verified that the compliance information will be extracted correctly, the extraction takes place and the compliance information is output from the obtainment system 600.
Extraction involves copying information from the securities submission document as a function of the starting and ending lines determined within the obtainment system 600 as described above. Of course, the same portion of the securities submission document may be retrieved as relevant to different securities. Each security would then have its own respective compliance information document.
If, as determined at step 1312, an error occurred during processing by any of the subsystems, for example if a securities submission does not contain necessary information, then the securities submission is placed on the error queue, step 1314. A system operator may look at the securities submissions that have been placed on the error queue at a later time to solve the problems encountered.
Once output from the obtainment system, the compliance information may be stored in a file system on either computer 592 or program server 590, step 1316. The compliance information may also be stored in a compliance information server 625. At step 1318, if it is determined that there are more entries in the quality assurance queue, control passes to step 1320 where the next entry from the queue is retrieved. The process then starts again at step 1304.
In one example, the compliance information server 625 may include a document processor for converting the compliance information from its native format, for example ASCII text or HTML format, into another format, for example into Microsoft Word® or Adobe Acrobats format. Of course, the compliance information, once extracted, may be kept in the source format as the original financial submission. The compliance information is then stored.
In one example of the present invention, the compliance information server 625 is incorporated into the same machine as the obtainment system 600. In this case a system for providing access to compliance information would include obtainment system 600 and an accessing system that incorporated compliance information server 625. In another embodiment the compliance information server 625 is a separate server from the obtainment system 600.
Referring to
The compliance information server 625 has access to the compliance information as well as the catalog information about the particular security associated with the compliance information. For example, all of the compliance information for a particular security may be listed. Because the compliance information server has the information that was entered by the system operator when the document was processed by the cataloging subsystem, all the compliance information for a particular security may be accessed either by the name of the security as it is marketed to the customer, the CUSIP number of the security, or the stock ticker symbol of the security.
Referring to
A request to compliance information server 625 may come in the form of a unique identifier for the security, such as an internal identifier, a CUSIP number or a stock ticker symbol. The indexer identifies the compliance information associated with that unique identifier. The compliance information server may output a list of the compliance information documents that are available. Alternatively, it may output the compliance information. In one example, the compliance information server receives a request for a list of all the information for a particular security. The request is in the form of a request for a web page. In response, the compliance information server 625 outputs a list of the compliance information. The list is in the form of a worldwide web page that contains links to each of the items of compliance information. The worldwide web page may also contain links to other information about that security.
Referring to
It should be appreciated that the foregoing description with reference to
Commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/135,834 discloses systems and methods which may be employed to identify one or more particular data elements within a computer-readable file containing summary prospectus information (which may be identified using the system described above in Section I) and to insert markers into the computer-readable file indicating the presence of this data. Using this system (as an example), individual sections of a summary prospectus document, and various data elements included in each section, may be identified, enabling the creation of an online version of the summary prospectus.
Commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/821,121, filed Apr. 8, 2004, entitled “System For Locating Data Elements Within Originating Data Sources,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference and relevant portions of which are reproduced below, discloses techniques for employing these markers to create logical associations between information included in various documents. Using these techniques, for example, a summary and statutory prospectus made available by a securities issuer may be processed to insert references (e.g., links) into sections of an online version of the summary prospectus to enable an investor to navigate from the sections of the online version to underlying detailed information provided in the statutory prospectus. In another example, these techniques may be used to process a statutory prospectus, identify certain key data elements contained within, and generate a summary prospectus to include these key data elements and references from sections of the summary prospectus containing one or more of the data elements to portions of the statutory prospectus providing more detailed information regarding the data element(s).
Some embodiments of the invention provide a capability to analyze one or more underlying documents (e.g., a statutory prospectus) to identify the location(s) within the document(s) at which detailed information corresponding to high-level information provided in a summary prospectus is found. Once the location(s) are identified, references may be created to corresponding detailed information. Portions of the information at the identified location(s) may be used to generate a summary prospectus, and the references may be inserted into the appropriate sections of the online version of the summary prospectus, so as to enable investors to readily navigate between high-level information in the summary prospectus and supporting detailed information contained in other documents. Alternatively, if a summary prospectus is made available by a securities issuer along with a corresponding statutory prospectus, references to portions of the statutory prospectus may be inserted into sections of the summary prospectus to enable investors to navigate between the high-level information in the summary prospectus and the supporting detail in the statutory prospectus.
An example process for inspecting a document to identify the location(s) at which information is found is depicted in
The identification of individual data items so that they may be tagged is described in greater detail with reference to
At the start of the process of
The process then proceeds to act 1720, wherein one or more specific data elements are located within the source information 1800. In some embodiments, identification is performed by processing facility 1820, which performs the identification and location using output received from receipt facility 1810, as well as input provided by a human user. Specifically, in some embodiments, processing module 1820 receives output from receipt facility 1810 which defines, based on the preliminarily identification performed by receipt facility 1810, the type of source information 1800. Processing facility 1820 uses this information to access one or more of a collection of data structures (e.g., flat files) which each contain one or more encoded parameters that are descriptive of data elements commonly found within the source information. Processing facility 1820 utilizes the encoded parameters to locate the data elements within the source information. Once a data element has been located in the source information, processing facility 1820 issues a prompt to a human user via a graphical user interface (GUI) to confirm that the data element has been correctly identified.
In some embodiments, encoded parameters are provided as text within a data structure. One or more data structures may collectively represent a “taxonomy” for a specific type of source information interpreted by processing facility 1820. Specifically, a taxonomy may define the characteristics of each of the data elements commonly found within the considered type of source information. A taxonomy may define data element characteristics for any type of source information. For example, a taxonomy may define characteristics of data elements within a type of securities filing from all issuers (e.g., all mutual fund prospectuses), all filings from a specific issuer, all filings from all issuers, or any other suitable grouping of source information. Further, more than one taxonomy may be applicable to a specific type of source information. The invention is not limited in this respect.
A taxonomy may include one or more descriptive characteristics for each data element to be identified within the source information. For example, a taxonomy for a mutual fund prospectus might provide parameters defining descriptive characteristics for a “portfolio manager” data element as it appears within a fund prospectus. For example, a parameter for the portfolio manager data element may indicate that this data element is normally accompanied by the text “portfolio manager” within the source information. Any of numerous descriptive characteristics may be provided as a parameter for a data element within a taxonomy. For example, a parameter may indicate that a specific data element is normally accompanied by specific text (as with the example provided above), is normally found at a specific location within the source information (e.g., at the end of the document, or at the top of a page), normally receives a specific graphical treatment (e.g., is provided in a specific font, as an icon, and/or in a specific color), or otherwise conforms to a rule regarding its appearance or presence within source information.
A taxonomy may include more than one parameter for a specific data element. For example, a taxonomy for a fund prospectus may contain a first parameter for the portfolio manager data element which indicates that it is normally accompanied by the text “portfolio manager,” a second parameter which indicates that it is normally found at the top of the second page of the prospectus, and a third parameter which indicates that it is provided in a specific font. Further, a taxonomy may specify which of these parameters must be satisfied in order for the data element to be identified. For example, a taxonomy may specify that only the first and second of the above-listed parameters must be satisfied to identify the portfolio manager data element, that all three parameters must be satisfied, that only one must be satisfied, or any other suitable combination of these parameters. The invention is not limited to a particular implementation in this respect.
In one embodiment, processing facility 1820 loads one or more taxonomies to memory and implements the encoded parameters therein as it processes the source information. In one embodiment, as the processing facility 1820 reads the source information it compares the characteristics of the source information with characteristics represented in the parameters. As in the example provided above, the taxonomy for a specific type of source information may contain a parameter which indicates that the presence of the text “portfolio manager” within that source information indicates the presence of the portfolio manager data element. As the processing facility 1820 reads the source information and compares its characteristics with those reflected by the parameters, upon encountering the text “portfolio manager” in the source information the processing facility may determine that the condition set forth by a parameter is satisfied, and identify the portfolio manager data element within the source information.
In some embodiments, a taxonomy may specify that a data element is accompanied by specific text or the equivalent of that text in any of several languages. For example, a taxonomy may specify that a portfolio manager data element is accompanied by the text “portfolio manager,” or the equivalent to “portfolio manager” in French, Spanish, Russian, Chinese, Japanese or any other language. Each of these equivalents to “portfolio manager” may simply be encoded as individual parameters within the taxonomy itself, or processing facility 1820 may be configured to translate text into one or more other languages as needed. In this respect, it should be appreciated that text used to identify a data element need not be provided in English characters, and may be provided in Cyrillic, Arabic, Japanese, Chinese or any other suitable characters.
As discussed above, a taxonomy need not identify a data element by specifying text that normally accompanies the data element. A taxonomy may specify any attribute of a data element, such as its placement within source information, graphical treatment, or any other suitable attribute. Further, a taxonomy need not identify a data element using a single characteristic, as it may do so using a combination of characteristics, only a subset of which may need to be satisfied to identify the data element. As a result, processing facility 1820 may perform one or more logical operations to evaluate a combination of characteristics to identify a data element. For example, a taxonomy may specify that two characteristics must be satisfied for a specific data element to be identified. As a result, processing facility 1820 may scan the source information to determine that both characteristics are satisfied before identifying the data element. In another example, a taxonomy may specify that two of a group of three characteristics must be satisfied, in which case processing facility 1820 may perform logical operations commensurate with this identification criteria. Any combination of logical operations, involving any combination of characteristics, may be performed to identify a data element, as the invention is not limited in this respect.
As discussed above, upon preliminarily identifying a data element in source information, processing facility 1820 may prompt a human user to confirm that the data element has been correctly identified. The process by means of which a human user interacts with the process to confirm the identification of one or more data elements is described in further detail below. However, with respect to the function of a taxonomy, it should be noted that a response received from a human user as to whether a data element has been correctly identified may be used to update the taxonomy. For example, if a taxonomy fails to correctly identify a portfolio manager data element within source information, perhaps because the text “portfolio manager” accompanies information other than the portfolio manager data element, then the user's input indicating that the portfolio manager data element has not been correctly identified may be used to update the taxonomy. For example, a GUI may prompt the user to manually identify the portfolio manager data element within the source information, and prompt the user to provide one or more characteristics defining the correct portfolio manager data element. For example, the GUI may enable the user to specify that the correct portfolio manager data element is, in fact, accompanied by the text “portfolio manager” (e.g., it may be one of many components of the source information which is accompanied by that text) but also that the portfolio manager data element is found at the top of a page within the source information, is given a specific graphical treatment, or is identifiable in some other manner. In another example, the GUI may enable the user to specify that the portfolio manager data element is not accompanied by the text “portfolio manager,” but rather the text “investment manager.” In this manner, interaction with the user may allow the taxonomy to flexibly adapt over time in accordance to changes to source information, such as changes to format and/or content of source information initiated by securities issuers.
Even if a taxonomy correctly identifies a data element, a user's input may be useful for keeping the taxonomy in conformance with the characteristics of source information. For example, if a taxonomy specifies that the portfolio manager data element is normally accompanied by the text “portfolio manager” but fails to specify that the data element also always appears in a specific location within the source information, processing facility 1820 may cause the taxonomy to be updated to add the location characteristic. Further, processing facility 1820 may indicate that the new characteristic is one which must be satisfied for the data element to be identified, or may be one of a combination of characteristics which might be satisfied and which is examined as part of a logical operation performed by processing facility 1820, as described above. This manner of updating a taxonomy to more closely conform to the characteristics of source information may be performed automatically, or upon receiving confirmation by a user that the update should occur. For example, processing facility 1820 may simply update the taxonomy over time upon observing characteristics of the data element as it appears in the source information, or may cause a user to be prompted (e.g., via a GUI) as to whether an observed characteristic should be added to a taxonomy.
At the completion of act 1720, the process of
After individual data items are identified, the identified data item(s) may be tagged. For example, identified items may be tagged using eXtensible Markup Language (XML) tags, as is known in the art. In some embodiments, the elements contained in an XML tagged document are defined in a Document Type Declaration (DTD). A validating parser program may, for example, check an XML tagged document for errors.
An example of a DTD, not intended to limit the present invention, is shown in
The processes described in this section may be used to not only identify and tag individual items of information contained within a summary prospectus, but also to identify and tag detailed information which corresponds to these data items contained in other compliance documents (e.g., a full statutory prospectus, statement of additional information (SAI), etc.). Once a logical association is created between items of information, references (e.g., hyperlinks) may be created between items in the summary prospectus and more detailed information contained in an underlying (in the following description, “source”) document or information.
In some embodiments, once a data element and its location within the source information is identified, an indication of the location (e.g., along with other information) may be stored in electronic file storage. In the embodiment depicted in
Anchor 1823 may express the location of a data element within source information in any of numerous ways. For example, a location may be expressed as a beginning data character (i.e., in an alphanumeric or text file containing the source information) for the data element and a quantity of characters over which the data element extends. In another example, a location may be expressed as a section of a page, such as might be provided by an HTML hyperlink containing a “#” section reference. In yet another example, a location may be expressed as a collection of pixels in an image file, such that the collection of pixels defines a portion of the image. In still another example, an anchor may not specify a particular location within source information, but may simply specify the source information in its entirety. Any suitable manner of expressing a location at which a data element appears within source information may be employed, as the invention is not limited in this respect.
The anchor 1823, as well as a corresponding data element 1821 and a representation of source information 1825, may be stored in electronic file storage 1830. The representation of source information 1825 may comprise, for example, source information 1800 in electronic form, as created by receipt facility 1810 (e.g., if source information 1800 was provided in hard copy form). The representation of source information 1825 may alternatively comprise a copy of source information 1800, if it was provided in electronic form to receipt facility 1810.
In some embodiments, storing anchor 1823, data element 1821 and source information 1825 in electronic file storage entails creating a logical association therebetween. A logical association may be established, for example, using conventional database technology. For example, if anchor 1823, data element 1821 and source information 1825 are stored in relational database tables, a logical association may be established with a foreign key from one table entry to another, as is well-known in the art. A logical association may be established in any suitable manner.
Once the logical association is established, anchor 1823 may be used to retrieve source information 1825 (or a portion thereof) at which a data element resides. For example, a user viewing an online version of a summary prospectus may retrieve, using corresponding anchor 1823, source information 1825, which may provide additional detail on an item of information included within the online version of the summary prospectus.
One example of a process 2200 for retrieving source information in this manner is shown in
A command may be created and issued in any suitable fashion. In one example, a command may be issued upon a user's invocation of a hyperlink associated with the data element and presented via a GUI, such as a browser application executing on a device in communication with the electronic file storage in which the anchor and/or source information is stored (e.g., electronic file storage 1830). Upon invocation of the hyperlink, the browser application may create and issue a command to the electronic file storage 1830, via any suitable communication protocol. This description of an exemplary command should not be construed as limiting, as a command may be issued, generated or communicated in any suitable manner and using any suitable mechanism, and may take any suitable form. Further, the command may be issued to and from any suitable device. When the command is received by the device, act 2210 completes.
Then the process proceeds to act 2220, wherein the command is processed to determine the anchor corresponding to the data element. In some embodiments, the hyperlink described above may be encoded to specify the anchor. In other embodiments, the anchor corresponding to the data element may be determined using a logical association between the anchor and data element, such as which may be provided by a database (as described above) or other data structure. The identification of the anchor corresponding to the data element may be performed in any suitable fashion, as the invention is not limited in this respect. Upon the identification of the anchor corresponding to the data element, act 2220 completes.
The process then proceeds to act 2230, wherein the anchor is retrieved. This may be accomplished, for example, by executing an instruction specifying the anchor to retrieve a record representing the anchor from electronic file storage. Upon the retrieval of the anchor, act 2230 completes.
The process then proceeds to act 2240, wherein the anchor is employed to retrieve source information, and more specifically the data element as presented in the source information. In some embodiments, the record representing the anchor retrieved in the act 2230 may supply an identifier for another record which contains or refers to the source information. This other identifier may be included in an instruction which is executed to retrieve the record and access the source information. Upon the retrieval of the source information, act 2240 completes.
The process then proceeds to act 2250, wherein the source information, and more specifically the portion of the source information which includes the data element, is presented. In some embodiments, the electronic file storage may transmit the source information to a device which executes a GUI (e.g., the GUI which a user employed to issue the command received in the act 2210), and the GUI may present the source information to the user. Presentation need not occur via a GUI and may occur in any suitable fashion, as the invention is not limited to any particular implementation. Upon the completion of the act 2250, process 2200 completes.
It should be appreciated that the retrieval of source information in which a data element was originally presented need not entail retrieving the entire source information in which the data element resides. That is, a subset of the source information, such as a particular segment in which the data element appears, may be retrieved and/or presented. Retrieval of a subset of the source information may be accomplished in any of numerous ways. For example, source information may be split into segments before it is stored. In another example, only the portion of source information in which the data element resides may be retrieved. Retrieval may be performed in any suitable fashion as embodiments of the invention are not limited in this respect.
It should be appreciated that the preceding section discloses a capability to analyze one or more underlying documents (e.g., a statutory prospectus) to identify the location(s) within the document(s) at which detailed information corresponding to high-level information provided in a summary prospectus is found. Once the location(s) are identified, references may be created to the detailed information. Portions of the information at the identified location(s) may be used to generate a summary prospectus, and the references may be inserted into the appropriate sections of the summary prospectus, to enable investors to navigate between high-level information in the summary prospectus and detail contained in the statutory prospectus. Alternatively, if a summary prospectus is made available by a securities issuer with the statutory prospectus, references to portions of the statutory prospectus may be inserted into sections of an online version of the summary prospectus to enable investors to navigate between the high-level information in the summary prospectus and the supporting detail in the statutory prospectus.
Commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/916,718, filed Aug. 12, 2004, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Managing Information Related to Securities,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference and relevant portions of which are reproduced herein, describes system and methods which may be employed to information available to investors in various forms (e.g., online, print, etc.). For example, when a securities issuer makes available a new statutory and/or summary prospectus for a security (e.g., via submission to EDGAR), some embodiments of the invention may enable the automatic acquisition and processing of the document(s) to enable the dissemination, in print and/or online form, of information contained therein to investors.
One embodiment of a computer system for making information available to investors is depicted in
At a high level, the system includes various components (e.g., software modules) configured to make information available to investors in any of numerous forms. For example, extract module 10 may extract filing data from EDGAR database 2305, and mapping module 2330 may identify individual compliance documents (e.g., one or more summary prospectus documents, statutory prospectus documents, statements of additional information, etc.) within the filing data, and load these documents to electronic file storage. Production module 2600 and Deployment module 2390 may generate versions of one or more compliance documents in different formats, to serve the needs of different users, and load document versions to Delivery Servers 2435A and 2435B, which users may access to view one or more compliance documents. Delivery Servers 2435A-2435B may afford multiple access methods to compliance documents. For example, Web delivery module 2800, which may comprise one or more web servers, may respond to user requests by serving information stored thereon. FTP server 2900 may respond to file transfer protocol (FTP) requests to serve documents. Print On Demand (POD) module 2800 may produce information in print form, customized to specific investor needs. For example, POD module 2800 may be configured to send compliance documents relating to individual investor's holdings.
More detailed aspects of the system of
In some embodiments, extract module 2310 identifies and extracts various filings submitted to the EDGAR database 2305 by mutual fund companies, corporations, or other issuers of securities. For example, securities issuers may submit filings to EDGAR in formats which include American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), hypertext markup language (HTML), portable document format (PDF), or a combination thereof. Extract module 2310 may, for example, extract filings as they are submitted to EDGAR, at some predetermined interval (e.g., daily), or at any other suitable time. In the example process shown, extract module 2310 transmits ASCII file 2311A, HTML file 2311B, and/or PDF file 2311C to electronic filing warehouse 2315, which may comprise any suitable combination of software and/or hardware components.
Filings 2311 stored in electronic filing warehouse 2315 are then replicated to deployment server 2380, production server 2320 and PDF production server 2485, each of which may comprise any suitable combination of hardware and/or software components. Each of servers 2380, 2320 and 2485 execute modules designed to perform different functions, as described below.
As described above, EDGAR filings commonly include information related to multiple securities, as well as multiple types of information related to those securities. For example, a single EDGAR filing may contain a prospectus for Fund A and an annual report for Fund B, and three prospectus supplements for Fund C. Thus, an investor seeking information on only Fund A, B, or C may find the filing unwieldy, confusing and difficult to decipher.
In some embodiments, the techniques described above in Section I may be employed to separate filings into distinct components. In the example process shown in
DAX module 2332 includes programmed routines designed to interpret data elements provided in an ASCII- or HTML-based EDGAR filing to identify the filing's distinct components. For example, DAX module 2332 may identify the portions of a filing relating to different securities, the issuer of the filing, its effective date, and any special rules which may apply (e.g., a supplement which may only be displayed with an accompanying document). Thus, DAX module 2332 identifies the individual “documents” that comprise each filing, representing information useful to an investor. DAX module 2332 may, for example, separate commingled filing data representing prospectuses and supplements for eight different funds, and “tag” documents so that subsequent processes may interpret the identified documents. In the example process shown, data is tagged using extensible markup language (XML) tags.
Charting module 2335 enables, in some embodiments, a semi-automated process whereby data elements provided in ASCII- and HTML-based filings may be interpreted to create charts. In this respect, the SEC prescribes that certain compliance documents must contain graphical representations of certain types of information (e.g., charts showing historical performance of the considered security). As ASCII and HTML data provided in filings submitted to EDGAR are incapable of expressing information in graphical form, charting module 2335 processes the ASCII and/or HTML data to create the prescribed charts. In some embodiments, charting module 2335 may pre-identify data elements in a ASCII or HTML filing likely to be used for creating a chart, prompt a human user to confirm that the pre-identified elements are to be used for chart creation, and if so, create XML tags and instructions which may be used by subsequent processes to create one or more charts in graphical form for the eventual document.
XDP module 2340 enables the processing described above in Section II whereby a set of predefined data elements are located within each filing and tagged (e.g., using XML tags). As described above, any of numerous data elements may be identified and tagged, such as data elements which may be useful to investors in comparing one security to another. In some embodiments, XDP module 2340 employs various keywords and defined business rules to preliminarily identify individual data elements, prompt a human user to confirm whether each data element has been correctly identified, and if so, creates a tag for each data element so that subsequent processes may quickly identify their location within a document.
In the example shown in
In the example depicted, PDF Production Server 2485 also receives filing data from filing warehouse 2315. In some embodiments, PDF Production Server 2485 may enable a process whereby filing data received from filing warehouse 2315 is converted to typeset (i.e., non-editable) form, so that the information may be transmitted or otherwise made available to investors in that form. For example, in one embodiment, filing data may be converted to a Portable Document Format (PDF) document, which may be transmitted or made available to investors via a web site.
In the example shown, the process of converting filing data to typeset form is performed by PDF Production Server 2485. Specifically, in this example, PDF Production Server 2485 produces a preliminary, preformatted version of a data structure representing filing data, which is then transmitted to a user's workstation (e.g., analyst 2515) for editing. The user may provide various instructions via a GUI executing on the workstation to invoke functionality provided by PDF Production Server 2485, so that a typeset document 2465 may be created. The typeset document is then transmitted to production data 2360.
In the example shown, the information stored at production data 2360 (i.e., document metadata 2345, chart XML data 2350, data points XML data 2355, and PostScript file 2565) is sent, with document data 2370, to deployment server 2380. As a result, at this point in the process, deployment server 2380 stores filing data 2311 and the information required to separate the filings into documents. This data is represented collectively as data 2385.
Extract module 2420 receives filing data 2311, as well as information provided in document metadata 2345, to extract one or more compliance documents from filing 2311. For example, extract module 2420 may process instructions provided by document metadata 2345 to determine the start and end of each document included within filing 2311. In some embodiments, extract module 2420 produces output in the form of an “un-styled” HTML document.
Module 2405 then adds a chart (and/or hyperlink to a chart) to applicable documents. In some embodiments, module 2405 processes information provided by chart XML data 2350 to construct a file containing a graphical representation (e.g. chart) of information, and may insert a hyperlink into the HTML document produced by routine 2420 which references the file. The file may be created in any suitable graphical file format, including .jpg, .gif, or other file formats.
In the example shown, HTML documents are then deployed to delivery servers 2435A-2435B. In some embodiments, delivery servers 2435A-2435B are equipped to receive and transmit network-based (e.g., web-based) communication. In the embodiment shown, all of the HTML documents created are transferred to delivery servers 2435A-2435B, and deleted from deployment server 2390 (of course, they may be recreated from the raw filing data and instructions produced in routine 2330).
It should be appreciated that another drawback with information on the EDGAR database (i.e., in addition to the unwieldy nature of the filings discussed above) is that there is no quick, reliable or easy way to determine the most current version of filings for a particular security. For example, it is not uncommon for a mutual fund company to file more than one prospectus for each of its funds on EDGAR. Each prospectus may be the subject of a replacement (whereby the issuer files a newer version of a prospectus to take the place of one already on file, but does not remove the older version), a revision (whereby the issuer files a newer version which modifies a prospectus already on file, but does not remove the older version), and/or one or more supplements or “stickers” (whereby the issuer indicates that a portion of the version on file should be replaced or supplemented with new information, but does not remove the older version). As a result, it can be extremely difficult for an investor to determine which version of an EDGAR filing for a security is the most current.
The system of
To create the compliance envelope, update index module 2415 determines whether a document contained within a given filing represents the most current information for the security, and thus warrants an update to the compliance folder. For example, update index 2415 may process data in the filing to determine whether a document should be designated as most current. In this respect, a document may contain information, such as an effective date, which defines when it should be made available to investors (documents are often filed in advance of their effective date, so may have to suspend their delivery for a time, then indicate when the effective date arrives that the document is most current). The effective date may also be used to determine when the document should be designated as the most current document, as well as how long it will remain effective. Thus, in some embodiments, although every document is deployed to delivery servers 2435A-2435B, the update index module 2415 uses the effective date to determine whether a particular document is most current, and if so updates the location for the considered type of document within the compliance envelope to reflect this. For example, update index module 2415 may process a number of rules to determine whether a particular document is the most current of certain types (e.g., prospectus, annual report, and semiannual report documents). In addition, rules may be processed to determine whether to make available a compliance envelope entry for a security. Example rules for determining whether a document is the most current of its type and/or whether an entry for a compliance envelope should be made available to investors are provided in above-referenced co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/916,781.
If update index module 2415 determines that a particular document is the most current of its type, it modifies the compliance folder to include the location of that document on servers 2435A-2435B, so that the most current of each type of compliance document may be easily accessed by investors. Thus, for example, when an investor issues a web-based request for a prospectus for Fund X, one of servers 2435A-2435B may access the compliance envelope to determine the location of the most current prospectus (as well as any additional information germane to the request and/or document, such as applicable supplements), and serve that data to the investor. In the embodiment shown, the compliance envelope is implemented using a table which reflects the location (i.e., within one or more file systems stored on delivery servers 2435A-2435B) of the most current document of each type for a particular security. However, a compliance envelope need not be implemented using a table, and may be implemented in any of numerous ways, such as with any form of data structure. The system is not limited to any particular implementation.
In some embodiments, using a compliance envelope to process investor requests for documents relating to a security may minimize the processing which a delivery server performs. For example, having an identified location of the most current compliance document of each type may mean that a delivery server need not perform logical processing (e.g., to compare characteristics of various compliance documents stored thereon) to determine the most current, but rather can simply retrieve the document from the identified location. In this manner, the response time of delivery servers 2535 may be minimized.
As described above, delivery servers 2435A-2435B may provide several vehicles through which an investor may access information stored thereon. Three of these vehicles (i.e., web delivery, FTP, and POD) are depicted in
In some embodiments, a web delivery vehicle may allow an investor 2447 to access information stored on delivery servers 2435A-2435B via the worldwide web. For example, investor 2447 may use a web browser to access a web site hosted by or for investment institution 2450 or online broker 2420 (i.e., exemplary entities that an investor uses to access information related to securities) on one of delivery servers 2435A-2435B. When an investor issues a request 2525 for information to the web site, validation module 2530 may authenticate the investor and determine the security for which the investor seeks information (e.g., based on a provided CUSIP).
In some embodiments, the format in which the information should be provided (e.g., as HTML, XML, PDF, etc.) is also determined. In the example shown, an indication of the format is provided within the URL used to issue the request, although this indication may be provided using any suitable mechanism(s). Validation module 2530 may process the request to determine whether the entity for which the site is hosted is approved to provide information for the considered security in the format requested.
In the example shown, if the request is validated, then module 2535 retrieves the requested information for the considered security and provides it to investor 2447 (e.g., as either HTML/XML document 2540 for “Level I/II” or PDF document 2545 for “Level III”). The retrieval process may include using the compliance envelope to determine the location of the document requested in the specified format.
In some embodiments, information may not be sent to an investor 2447 in response to the investor's request, but rather in response to a document having been published to EDGAR. For example, an investor may have given prior consent to electronic delivery of updates to certain types of documents for a particular security. Thus, when an updated document is identified, the system may cause the document (e.g., in PDF form) or a message indicating that a document and the location at which it is available, to be sent to the investor. Commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/023,039 (entitled “Obtaining Consent for Electronic Delivery of Compliance Information”) and Ser. No. 09/785,630 (entitled “Method and Apparatus for Providing Financial Transaction Data Via The Internet”) disclose example techniques for obtaining investor consent to electronic delivery of information and for providing data related to securities transactions, respectively, which may also be employed to deliver compliance documents, such as a summary prospectus, to an investor.
Of course, compliance documents such as a statutory and/or summary prospectus need not be sent to investors electronically, as they may also, or alternatively, be provided in hard copy form. The embodiments of the invention which provide a capability for a statutory and/or summary prospectus to be sent to an investor in hard copy form may also provide functionality for suppressing delivery to certain investors. In this respect, it should be appreciated that although the SEC generally requires that a prospectus for a security be delivered to an investor within a specified timeframe after certain events occur (e.g., after the investor purchases the security), there are exceptions to this general rule. For example, a prospectus need not be sent to an investor who previously received that prospectus, or who is purchasing additional shares of the security (i.e., rather than making an initial purchase). As such, embodiments of the present invention provide a capability for determining, using data on investor holdings, previous investor mailings, and filings acquired from EDGAR to determine the investors to whom a newly published statutory and/or summary prospectus should be sent. In particular, some embodiments provide a capability for producing a “print recipe” identifying investors to whom a summary prospectus should be sent.
Upon the completion of the act 2710, the process proceeds to act 2720, wherein the holdings for each investor account which qualify for the mailing are determined. One embodiment of a method for determining client account holdings which qualify is depicted in
In
There are numerous variations to the process of
Alternatively, client accounts may be selected for inclusion in a mailing according to criteria which are unrelated to their holdings or mailing history. For example, clients may be selected that participate in a certain type of plan (e.g., a 401(k) plan), own a certain type of product (e.g., a variable annuity), or own a certain security (e.g., IBM stock) may be selected for a mailing. In this manner, a customer may execute promotions related to certain products, plans, or securities. The selection of client accounts for a mailing may be performed in any suitable manner.
Referring again to
The determination of the documents to be included in a mailing may include multiple steps. First, business rules may guide whether document supplements are to be mailed. For example, the rules may dictate that if a client mailing includes only a supplement, the supplement should not be mailed, because the expense is unjustified. On the other hand, rules may dictate that a supplement is sent regardless of whether it constitutes the sole mailing for that client. Second, the process may identify whether a client holds multiple securities described in a combined document (i.e. documents containing information related to more than one security) and include that document in the mailing only once. There are numerous ways to identify the documents to be included in a mailing, and the process is not limited to a particular implementation.
Upon the completion of act 2730, the process proceeds to act 2740, wherein a determination is made as to whether any clients have consented to electronic delivery. This determination may be made by comparing the client accounts to a data structure containing client accounts which have consented to electronic delivery. The records for clients who have not consented are passed to the act 2770, while the records for clients who have consented are passed to the act 2750. In the embodiment shown, act 2770 is not performed until the completion of acts 2750 and 2760.
In act 2750, electronic delivery is attempted for those clients which have consented. As described above, electronic delivery may include a message sent to a client's e-mail address or a text message sent to the client's wireless device (e.g., cell phone or PDA) indicating that the document is available for retrieval from a web site identified (e.g., with a URL) in the message, or other form of notification.
Upon the completion of the act 2750, the process proceeds to act 2760, wherein it is determined whether each attempt at electronic delivery was successful. This may be performed by determining whether a message was returned. If it is determined in act 2760 that electronic delivery was successful for a particular client record, the process ends for that client record. If it is determined in act 2760 that electronic delivery was unsuccessful for a client record, the record is passed to the act 2770, to be processed with those client records that did not consent to electronic delivery. In addition, the record may have an indicator set which triggers the creation of a message (e.g., a mail-gram or other notice) which notifies the client that electronic delivery failed.
In act 2770, the unique recipients and print package for each client mailing are determined. In one embodiment, the unique recipients for a mailing are determined by executing a house holding process. In some implementations, a householding process seeks to identify multiple client records which belong to a single household, so that only a single mailing may be sent to that household. The process may be configured to identify records with a common household in any of numerous ways, such as according to regulations issued by the SEC, or according to business rules supplied by a customer. For example, the process may be configured to determine that client records having equivalent last name and address fields should be assigned to the same household. In addition, the process may also determine the unique funds held by household members. For example, if two members of the same household own the same security and were to receive the same document for that security, the process may eliminate one of the duplicate documents from the mailing.
The print package to be delivered to each recipient may be configured in any of numerous ways, such as with business rules provided by the customer. For example, the customer may specify that documents sent to participants in particular plans, clients who own specific products or securities, or clients in specific geographic regions should be given customized covers, such as covers which specify a product name, logo, return address, or other information. The customer may also specify that documents sent to particular clients should be given customized cover letters, such as letters which specify a plan name, fund name, or client e-mail address.
Upon the completion of act 2770, the process proceeds to act 2780, wherein the print recipe is created and the documents which are include in the print recipe are retrieved. According to one embodiment, the recipe includes a collection of records, each of which includes information describing a unique client, indications of the documents that are to be sent to the client, and other indicators for how the mailing is to be customized.
An exemplary print recipe record is depicted in
Referring again to
The act 2780 may include splitting the print recipe file into multiple files. This may be done for any of numerous reasons. For example, a customer may have requested that its own PDF files be used instead of those created in the PDF production process shown in
Upon the completion of act 2780, the process proceeds to act 2790, wherein the print recipe and the specified documents are used to prepare a set of documents for delivery to investors. Upon the completion of act 2790, the process 2700 ends.
The techniques for processing securities-related information described above may be performed at a configurable periodicity. For example, in some embodiments, information contained in a summary prospectus and/or corresponding detailed documents may be processed throughout the year (e.g., the calendar year and/or a securities issuer's or intermediary's fiscal year) so that as new detailed documents are made available, an online version summary prospectus may provide access to this updated information, either in addition to or instead of information previously made available by a securities issuer or intermediary. For example, an exhaustive repository of information relating to a security (e.g., multiple online version summary prospectuses, which may have issued periodically and include information that has changed over time, with the detailed documents corresponding to each online version) may be provided, or only the most current version of information relating to a security (e.g., a single, most current online version summary prospectus and the current documents it references) may be made available, or some combination of these approaches may be employed (e.g., by providing access to a single, most current online version summary prospectus, and a repository of detailed documents that include information that has changed over time, vice versa, etc.). The invention is not limited to any particular implementation.
Some embodiments may make provisions for compliance with periodic update requirements set forth by the SEC and/or other regulatory agencies. For example, if the SEC issued a new requirement that securities issuers and/or intermediaries must make available updates to a security's statutory and/or summary prospectus, or portions thereof, more frequently than annually (e.g., quarterly), then embodiments of the invention may be configured to enable creation of a new online version summary prospectus and/or updates to an existing online version summary prospectus with updated information (e.g., updates to a mutual fund's top holdings) at the required frequency. If an existing online version summary prospectus is updated to include new or revised information, this information may be acquired from any of numerous sources. For example, information may be acquired (e.g., using the techniques described above in Sections I-III) from a new statutory prospectus or other document published by the securities issuer and/or intermediary (e.g., a new summary prospectus, supplement, SAI and/or other document(s)) and/or other information. Embodiments of the invention are not limited to any particular implementation.
If updates to information on a security occur more frequently than annually, and a new online version summary prospectus is created, then embodiments of the invention may provide a set of investor information resources which includes one or more previous online version summary prospectuses, each including links to corresponding detailed documents. For example, a reference between each online version summary prospectus and the detailed documents it references may be kept static over time, even as new summary prospectus and/or detailed documents are published by a securities issuer and/or intermediary. As such, embodiments of the invention may enable an investor to review previous online version summary prospectuses and the detailed documents referenced thereby to determine how certain key information relating to a security has changed over time, or to review information on a security as of a certain date, enabling a more thorough analysis of a security's history along dimensions which are important to the investor. For example, the investor might gain insight into how a mutual fund's top holdings changed over time (perhaps giving some indication of how volatile are the fund's holdings), whether there have been any increases in certain fees over time (perhaps giving some indication of whether and when further fee increases might be expected), etc.
Of course, the invention is not limited to being implemented with static links from a given online version summary prospectus to underlying detailed documents, as relationships between online version summary prospectuses and underlying documents need not be one-to-one, and may change over time. For example, when a new online version summary prospectus with links to updated detailed documents is created, previous online versions may be retained, but the links to detailed documents in those previous online versions may be updated to reference the most recent versions of those detailed documents, may be supplemented with links to the most recent versions of those detailed documents, or may be otherwise modified. In this manner, an investor who accesses an online version summary prospectus which is not the most up-to-date (e.g., an investor who enters an outdated URL provided on a previous hard copy summary prospectus mailed to the investor some time ago) may be alerted that more current information is available, while still enabling the investor to see how information on the security has changed over time.
Some embodiments of the invention may enable making multiple versions of a particular summary prospectus available to investors in hard copy and/or online form. This may be desirable, for example, because some investors in a given security may have who purchased it directly from the issuer, while others may have purchased the security through an intermediary (e.g., a broker-dealer), and each entity which sells the security to investors may wish to have the summary prospectus branded a particular way to engender investor loyalty and brand awareness. For example, each entity that sells the security to investors may employ different branding elements (e.g., logos, text fonts, formatting styles, etc.) in generating a hard copy summary prospectus for delivery to investors. These branding elements may, for example, be overlaid or otherwise added to a preliminary version of the summary prospectus made available by the security issuer (e.g., via the EDGAR database). As a result, a first group of investors who purchase the security directly from the issuer may receive one version of a hard copy and/or online version summary prospectus which contains branding elements specific to the issuer, while a second group of investors who purchased the security through an intermediary (e.g., a broker/dealer) may receive a version of the hard copy and/or online version summary prospectus which is specific to the intermediary from which the security was purchased and which contains branding elements specific to the considered intermediary. As a result, each entity may market its services to the investors to whom it delivers the hard copy and/or online version summary prospectus.
Some embodiments may provide for creating different versions of a hard copy summary prospectus, each including a different URL for a different online version summary prospectus, to accomplish a similar objective. For example, one version of a hard copy summary prospectus may be created for investors that purchased the security through the issuer, with that version including a URL for an online version summary prospectus hosted on the issuer's web site, and one or more other versions may be created for investors that purchased the security through an intermediary, with each version including a URL for an online version summary prospectus hosted on a respective intermediary's website. As such, each intermediary may have an opportunity to markets its services to investors via its online version summary prospectus version.
Versions of a hard copy and/or online version summary prospectus may be created in any of numerous ways, as embodiments of the invention are not limited to any particular technique. For example, the processes described above in Section I may be employed by an intermediary and/or service provider engaged thereby to identify when a summary prospectus is published for a security held by a customer of the intermediary (i.e., an investor). When a summary prospectus is published, the techniques described in Section II-III may be employed to create a hard copy summary prospectus for delivery to the investor which includes branding elements specific to the intermediary, and a URL for an online version summary prospectus which is hosted on the intermediary's website (or a website created by the service provider for the intermediary). Similarly, a securities issuer and/or service provider engaged thereby may employ the techniques described above when publishing a summary prospectus for a security held by customers to create a hard copy summary prospectus for delivery to each customer which includes branding elements specific to the issuer and a URL for an online version summary prospectus which is hosted on the issuer's website (or a website created by the service provider for the issuer). Embodiments of the invention may be employed to create different versions of a hard copy and/or online version summary prospectus to accomplish various business objectives in any of numerous ways, as the invention is not limited to any particular implementation.
Various aspects of the systems and methods for practicing features of the invention may be implemented on one or more computer systems, such as the exemplary computer system 2800 shown in
The processor 2803 may also execute one or more computer programs to implement various functions. These computer programs may be written in any type of computer program language, including a procedural programming language, object-oriented programming language, macro language, or combination thereof. These computer programs may be stored in storage system 2806. Storage system 2806 may hold information on a volatile or non-volatile medium, and may be fixed or removable. Storage system 2806 is shown in greater detail in
Storage system 2806 typically includes a computer-readable and writable nonvolatile recording medium 2901, on which signals are stored that define a computer program or information to be used by the program. A medium may, for example, be a disk or flash memory. Typically, an operation, the processor 2803 causes data to be read from the nonvolatile recording medium 2901 into a volatile memory 2902 (e.g., a random access memory, or RAM) that allows for faster access to the information by the processor 2803 than does the medium 2901. The memory 2902 may be located in the storage system 2806, as shown in
The above-described embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in any of numerous ways. For example, the above-discussed functionality can be implemented using hardware, software or a combination thereof. When implemented in software, the software code can be executed on any suitable processor or collection of processors, whether provided in a single computer or distributed among multiple computers. In this respect, it should be appreciated that any component or collection of components that perform the functions described herein can be generically considered as one or more controllers that control the above-discussed functions. The one or more controllers can be implemented in numerous ways, such as with dedicated hardware, or by employing one or more processors that are programmed using microcode or software to perform the functions recited above. Where a controller stores or provides data for system operation, such data may be stored in a central repository, in a plurality of repositories, or a combination thereof.
Further, it should be appreciated that a (client or server) computer may be embodied in any of a number of forms, such as a rack-mounted computer, desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, or other type of computer. Additionally, a (client or server) computer may be embedded in a device not generally regarded as a computer but with suitable processing capabilities, including a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a smart phone or any other suitable portable or fixed electronic device.
Also, a (client or server) computer may have one or more input and output devices. These devices can be used, among other things, to present a user interface. Examples of output devices that can be used to provide a user interface include printers or display screens for visual presentation of output and speakers or other sound generating devices for audible presentation of output. Examples of input devices that can be used for a user interface including keyboards, and pointing devices, such as mice, touch pads, and digitizing tables. As another example, a computer may receive input information through speech recognition or in other audible format.
Such computers may be interconnected by one or more networks in any suitable form, including as a local area network or a wide area network, such as an enterprise network or the Internet. Such networks may be based on any suitable technology and may operate according to any suitable protocol and may include wireless networks, wired networks or fiber optic networks. Also, the various methods or processes outlined herein may be coded as software that is executable on one or more processors that employ any one of a variety of operating systems or platforms.
Additionally, software may be written using any of a number of suitable programming languages and/or conventional programming or scripting tools, and also may be compiled as executable machine language code or intermediate code that is executed on a framework or virtual machine.
In this respect, the invention may be embodied as a storage medium (or multiple storage media) (e.g., a computer memory, one or more floppy disks, compact disks, optical disks, magnetic tapes, flash memories, circuit configurations in Field Programmable Gate Arrays or other semiconductor devices, or other computer storage media) encoded with one or more programs that, when executed on one or more computers or other processors, perform methods that implement the various embodiments of the invention discussed above. The storage medium or media can be transportable, such that the program or programs stored thereon can be loaded onto one or more different computers or other processors to implement various aspects of the present invention as discussed above.
The terms “program” or “software” are used herein in a generic sense to refer to any type of computer code or set of computer-executable instructions that can be employed to program a computer or other processor to implement various aspects of the present invention as discussed above. Additionally, it should be appreciated that according to one aspect of this embodiment, one or more computer programs that when executed perform methods of the present invention need not reside on a single computer or processor, but may be distributed in a modular fashion amongst a number of different computers or processors to implement various aspects of the present invention.
Computer-executable instructions may be provided in many forms, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Typically the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
Various aspects of the present invention may be used alone, in combination, or in a variety of arrangements not specifically discussed in the embodiments described in the foregoing and is therefore not limited in its application to the details and arrangement of components set forth in the foregoing description or illustrated in the drawings. For example, aspects described in one embodiment may be combined in any manner with aspects described in other embodiments.
Use of ordinal terms such as “first,” “second,” “third,” etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements.
Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this invention, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/508,987, filed Jul. 24, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/135,834, filed Apr. 30, 2002, the entirety of which are incorporated herein by reference. This invention relates to processing information relating to securities, such as compliance information relating to a mutual fund or other non-corporate security.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15991947 | May 2018 | US |
| Child | 16853379 | US | |
| Parent | 14880576 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15991947 | US | |
| Parent | 14573787 | Dec 2014 | US |
| Child | 14880576 | US | |
| Parent | 14246843 | Apr 2014 | US |
| Child | 14573787 | US | |
| Parent | 13932714 | Jul 2013 | US |
| Child | 14246843 | US | |
| Parent | 12508987 | Jul 2009 | US |
| Child | 13932714 | US | |
| Parent | 10135834 | Apr 2002 | US |
| Child | 12508987 | US |
