This application is based on and claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-008765, filed Jan. 17, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a processing system capable of efficiently and precisely processing workpieces on which processing such as welding is performed.
Heretofore, welding has been utilized as a process for joining a plurality of members together in a variety of fields. Automation of such welding processes has been greatly advanced and, in recent years, such a processing system has emerged that automatically welds a plurality of members together at joining portions thereof to form a workpiece (such as a steel wheel for an automobile).
Furthermore, it is necessary for such a processing system that automatically welds a plurality of members together at joining portions thereof to form a workpiece to operate at higher speed and in a more precise manner. For this reason, it is necessary for such a processing system, that processing should be able to be performed with proper processing precision, by measuring variations of individual workpieces using sensors, cycle time should be reduced, and overall processing system costs should be reduced, etc.
Some conventional technologies that are used to inhibit reduction in productivity at the time of manufacturing may calculate manufacturing cost by assigning parts and part data to a plurality of different facilities, such that the overall cycle time of each facility is close to the overall cycle time of the other facilities(e.g., see Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2002-169839 (pages 3-9, FIG. 2), Japanese Patent and Utility Model Gazette).
In some conventional technologies, a plurality of different manufacturing lines are provided to manufacture sub-wire-harnesses for the purpose of suppressing their interim inventories as much as possible. The manufacturing lines are managed on a line by line basis to control their cycle times (e.g., see Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. HEI 11-339572 (pages 2-3, FIG. 1), Japanese Patent and Utility Model Gazette).
A number of conventional technologies may use touch sensing technologies to compensate for the deviation of the position of a workpiece (e.g., see Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication Nos. 2003-285164 (page 4), 2003-53535 (page 4), and 2000-225467 (page 3, FIGS. 2, 3), Japanese Patent and Utility Model Gazette). Some conventional technologies may use a welding torch to perform touch sensing by modifying a support for a welding wire (e.g., see Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. HEI 11-254142 (page 3, FIG. 1), Japanese Patent and Utility Model Gazette). Some conventional technologies may attempt to use a tungsten electrode used for arc welding as a touch sensing probe (e.g., see Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. HEI 09-216059 (pages 2-3, FIGS. 3, 4), Japanese Patent and Utility Model Gazette).
However, in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2002-169839, the accumulated cycle time of each facility is made to be close to cycle times of other facilities for the purpose of calculating a manufacturing cost. In Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. HEI 11-339572, the manufacturing lines are managed on a line by line basis to control their cycle times for the purpose of suppressing their interim inventories as much as possible. Unlike the present invention, none of these conventional technologies provides a slide device including a plurality of lanes, and a measurement stage and a processing stage for the slide device for the purpose of optimizing cycle time on a workpiece-by-workpiece basis.
While some conventional technologies discussed above use touch sensing, unlike the present invention, none of them use touch sensing to create a compensation table so as to enable high-precision processing.
As described above, none of the conventional technologies discussed above measures variations of individual workpieces and then operates a measuring device and a processing device efficiently by considering processing precision, overall system cost, reduction of time required for tooling change, etc.
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a processing system capable of efficiently handling workpieces and operating a measurement instrument and a processing device.
In order to achieve the above described object, a processing system according to the present invention includes: a carry-in stage including a carry-in device for carrying in workpieces; an operation stage in which the workpieces are measured and processed, the operation stage being disposed in series with the carry-in stage and including a measurement device and a processing device, in this order, from a carry-in stage side thereof, the measurement device being separated from the processing device; a carry-out stage disposed in series with the operation stage and including a carry-out device for carrying out the workpieces; a slide device disposed between the measurement device and the processing device of the operation stage, the slide device including a plurality of lanes, the plurality of lanes being respectively provided with fixing jigs movable back and forth; and a controller configured to perform control such that the carry-in device sequentially moves the workpieces onto the respective fixing jigs, the fixing jigs are moved along the slide device, the measurement device measures workpiece measurement portions of the workpieces and the processing device processes the workpiece measurement portion, and thereafter the carry-out device carries the workpieces out. In this embodiment, the fixing jigs provided on the plurality of lanes are moved back and forth between the measurement stage and the processing stage, the workpieces fixed to the fixing jigs are efficiently conveyed, and the processing device and the measurement device are efficiently operated. Therefore, cycle time can be reduced while high precision processing is maintained. Furthermore, if some of the fixing jigs fail, the processing can be continued by conveying the workpieces along the slide device using the remaining fixing jigs.
In the processing system according to the present invention, the measurement device may be comprised of one measurement sensor and one measurement robot. In this embodiment, only one robot makes measurements at a plurality of slide devices and merely needs to change measurement points when the workpiece are changed, resulting in further cost savings.
The processing system according to the present invention may further include: an input inspection device provided in the carry-in stage, for inspecting and determining positions of the workpieces and an output inspection device provided in the carry-out stage, for inspecting the workpieces, wherein the carry-in device is comprised of a carry-in robot, the carry-out device is comprised of a carry-out robot, the workpieces are carried onto the fixing jigs from the input inspection device by the carry-in robot, the workpieces are carried onto the output inspection device from the fixing jigs by the carry-out robot. In this embodiment, carrying onto and out from the plurality of slide devices, checking the workpieces and determining the positions of the workpieces as the workpieces are carried in, and inspecting the processing results of the workpieces as the workpieces are carried out can be automated. Furthermore, changing a grip position when the type of workpiece is changed can be automated.
The processing system according to the present invention may further include a shield device provided between the measurement device and the processing device. In this embodiment, the measurement device in the measurement stage is separated from the processing device in the processing stage to thereby eliminate negative influences of vibration, light, noise, and dust that may otherwise be transferred between the measurement device and the processing device.
In the processing system according to the present invention, the processing device may be comprised of a welding robot, including an error measurement system configured to measure a position error between measurement point data of the workpiece measurement portion measured by the measurement robot and the workpiece measurement portion prior to welding. A controller associated with the welding robot may be configured to create a compensation table from error data measured by the error measurement system. The processing system may further include a compensation-based driving device for operating the welding robot based on the compensation table. In this embodiment, welding can be performed accurately by the welding robot based on the compensation table created from the position error between the measurement point data of the work measurement portion.
In the processing system according to the present invention, the processing device may be comprised of a welding robot configured to be controlled by the controller, the welding robot including an error measurement system and the controller including a position data generation system, wherein the position data generation system is configured to generate position data by controlling the welding robot so as to slightly change a position and an orientation of the welding robot, separately, based on the measurement point data of the workpiece measurement portion measured by the measurement robot, and wherein the error measurement system is configured to measure a position error of the welding robot which is included in position data generated by the position data generation system, and wherein the controller is configured to create a compensation table from error data measured by the error measurement device. The processing device may further include a compensation-based driving device configured to operate the welding robot based on the compensation table. In this embodiment, welding can be performed accurately by the welding robot based on the compensation table created from the data in the vicinity of the actual work measurement portion.
In the processing system according to the present invention, the error measurement system may be comprised of a touch sensing device including a tip end of the welding robot and/or a visual recognition device including a visual sensor. In this embodiment, more accurate compensation can be performed.
In the processing system according to the present invention, the controller associated with the welding robot may be configured to create a compensation table for the workpiece measurement portion using input received from the welding robot operating on a model workpiece identical to the workpieces to be processed. In this embodiment, the model workpiece which is identical in dimension to the workpieces and whose measurement portion is accurately finished can be used to reduce the time required to create a compensation table and improve the accuracy of the compensation table.
In the processing system according to the present invention, the workpieces may be steel wheels for an automobile, the input inspection device may be configured to inspect each of the workpieces and determine a position of each workpiece based on a valve hole or a shape of each workpiece, and the output inspection device may be configured to detect whether or not a break caliper hits the wheel. In this embodiment, welding the wheels can be automated while maintaining high accuracy and reducing cycle time.
The above features, as well as other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description taken with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Hereinbelow, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
As shown in the drawing, a processing system 1 comprises four stages including a carry-in stage 2, a measurement stage 3, a processing stage 4, and a carry-out stage 5, that are arranged in series from the right side of the drawing. A slide device 7, which includes three lanes 6a, 6b, 6c in this embodiment, is provided between the measurement stage 3 and the processing stage 4. While the present example of the slide device 7 includes three lanes 6a, 6b, 6c, this number of lanes is just an example and any plural number of lanes may be used instead. Fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c, which may be moved back and forth along the slide device 7 (in the right and left direction of the drawing) with a high degree of precision, are respectively provided on the lanes 6a, 6b, 6c. A controller is designated at 9 and configured to perform control such that a carry-in robot 10 described below sequentially carries the wheels 14 onto respective fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c, the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c are moved along the lanes of the slide device 7, a measurement robot 11 described below measures workpiece measurement portions, a welding robot 12 described below welds the workpiece measurement portions, and thereafter a carry-out robot 13 carries the wheels 14 out. The controller 9 can be comprised of a personal computer or other suitable computing device, for example. While a central controller is depicted, it will be appreciated that the control functions described herein alternatively may be divided among a plurality of distributed controllers assigned to the various components of processing system 1. For example, one controller may control all welding robots, each welding robot may have its own controller, etc.
Furthermore, in this embodiment, the carry-in robot 10 serves as a carry-in device in the carry-in stage 2, the measurement robot 11 serves as a measurement device in the measurement stage 3, the welding robot 12 serves as a processing device in the processing stage 4, and the carry-out robot 13 serves as a carry-out device in the carry-out stage 5. Thus, in this embodiment, each of the wheels 14 is forwarded from right to left in the drawing, and, at each of the stages, is transferred, measured, or processed by one of the robots 10 to 13.
The carry-in stage is provided with a conveyer 15 for conveying the wheels 14 and an input inspection device 16 for inspecting position information of wheels 14 carried in by the conveyer 15. The input inspection device 16 is configured to inspect the position of a valve hole (air inlet hole) of each of the wheels 14 using a light sensor. Based on the position of the valve hole, a coordinate system of the wheel as carried in (for example, a rotational angle, a positional deviation of the wheel with respect to a reference point, etc.) is determined. The input inspection device 16 may be any suitable device that is capable of detecting a reference position of a coordinate system of a workpiece.
Thereafter, the wheels 14 for which the coordinate systems were determined are carried by the carry-in robot 10 provided in the carry-in stage 2 and placed onto the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c located on the slide device 7 in the measurement stage 3. The carry-in robot 10 is typically an articulated robot capable of carrying the wheels 14 from the input inspection device 16 and placing the wheels 14 onto any of the plurality of fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c. The carry-in robot 10 is provided with a grip 19 capable of handling a wheel 14, with the wheel 14 being kept flat as illustrated in
The measurement stage 3 is provided with the measurement robot 11 for measuring a coordinate system of each of the wheels 14 carried onto one of the plurality of the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c located in a predetermined location, with the wheel 14 kept in a predetermined orientation. In this example, a laser sensor 20 is provided on a tip of an arm of the measurement robot 11, and a coordinate system of the wheel 14 determined by the laser sensor 20 is inputted into the controller 9. Measurement robot 11 can also be an articulated robot.
The coordinate system of the wheel 14 determined by the measurement robot 11 is used in determining processing points (corresponding to workpiece measurement portions) in the next processing stage 4. The wheels 14 measured by the measurement robot 11 are conveyed to the processing stage 4 by the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c, while keeping their correct coordinate systems unchanged.
In this embodiment, the measurement device in the measurement stage 3 is comprised of one measurement robot 11 with a laser sensor 20, thereby enabling simultaneous measurements at a plurality of lanes 6a, 6b, 6c and effecting quick position change when the workpiece is changed. Use of one robot for these functions yields desirable cost savings.
The processing stage 4 is provided with four welding robots 12 for welding the wheels 14. In this embodiment, two of the welding robots are located in the left and right sides of the slide device 7 (i.e., vertically shown in
As shown in
A shield device 25 for shielding between the measurement robot 11 and the welding robots 12 is provided between the measurement robot 11 and the welding robots 12. The shielding device 25 includes a curtain 26 extending to a location above the wheel 14. The curtain 26 prevents spatter, etc., from falling toward a side on which the robot 11 is positioned at the time of welding.
In addition to the above-described easing of negative effects of the vibrations of the welding robots 12 on the measurement robot 11, by providing the measurement robot 11 and the welding robots 12 on separate structures and providing the shielding device 25 between the measurement robot 11 and the welding robots 12, the negative effects of light, noise, spatter, etc., at the time of welding on the measurement robot 11 are mitigated.
In the processing stage 4, a shielding device 27 is provided at an approximate center between the welding robots 12 arranged in the sliding direction of the slide device 7. The shielding device 27 is provided with a spatter cover 28 capable of moving up and down at an approximate center of the wheel 14. This spatter cover 28 can be moved down to an approximate middle of the wheel 14 to prevent spatter from falling down from a welding portion and adhering to an attachment surface or an ornamental surface of the wheel 14.
The slide device 7 is provided with three lanes 6a, 6b, 6c. The lanes 6a, 6b, 6c are respectively provided with the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c which may be moved back and forth along the slide device 7 (in the right and left direction of the drawing). These fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c are capable of respectively and accurately sliding along the lanes 6a, 6b, 6c on their own (for example, with the position error based on the overall length of the slide being on the order of 1/100 mm ), traveling between the carry-in side and the carry-out side.
Each of the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c according to this embodiment includes thereon a fixing member (not shown) capable of fixing thereto a wheel 14 serving as the workpiece, with the wheel 14 being kept flat. In this embodiment, since the workpiece is a wheel 14, each of the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c also has a function of rotating a wheel 14 in a horizontal plane. The slide device 7 is provided with, for example, position sensors along the slide device 7 at predetermined positions for detecting positions of the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c. The above described controller 9 is configured to perform control such that the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c are conveyed back and forth with a high degree of precision.
A cycle of moving the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c back and forth is set so as to minimize cycle time and efficiently operate the welding robots 12 (processing devices) and the measurement robot 11 (measurement device). Furthermore, the optimum number of lanes 6a, 6b, 6c are determined and then the number of fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c requiring precision are reduced, thereby allowing the costs of the processing system 1 to be reduced.
With the slide device 7 comprising the plurality of lanes 6a, 6b, 6c along which the plurality of fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c are individually and respectively moved, even if some of the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c and the lanes 6a, 6b, 6c of the slide device 7 fail, the workpieces can be continuously processed by using the remaining fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c and the lanes 6a, 6b, 6c of the slide device 7.
The optimum number of lanes of the slide device 7 in the first embodiment can be determined by the following relationships.
The number of lanes is set to “2” if the conveying time is relatively short such as, for example:
1. if X≈Y+Z (i.e., X is approximately equal to Y+Z, which occurs, for example, when measurement time is long and approximately equal to processing time+conveying time required (for carrying-in+sliding movement+carrying-out)), or
2. if Y≈X+Z (i.e., Y is approximately equal to X+Z, which occurs, for example, when processing time is long and approximately equal to measurement time+conveying time required (for carrying-in+sliding movement+carrying-out)),
where X is measurement time, Y is processing time, Z is conveying time required (for carrying-in+sliding movement+carrying-out), and p is Z/(X+Y) which is a ratio of conveying time Z to (measurement time X+processing time Y). The closer the above equality relationships are to true, the higher the efficiency is.
The number of lanes is set to “3” if X, Y, and Z are substantially equal to each other such as, for example:
3. if X≈Y≈Z (measurement time is approximately equal to processing time, which is approximately equal to conveying time required (for carrying-in+sliding movement+carrying-out)). The closer the above equality relationship is to true, the higher the efficiency is.
The number of lanes is set to an integer close to “2p+2” if the conveying time is relatively long such as, for example:
4. if p(X+Y)≈Z (p>=1) (i.e., conveying time required for (carrying-in+sliding movement+carrying-out) is longer than measurement time+processing time). The closer the above equality relationship is to true, the higher the efficiency is. For example, the number of lanes=(2p+2)=4 if p=1. The number of lanes=(2p+2)=5 if p=1.5. The number of lanes=(2p+2)=6 if p=2. The number of lanes=(2p+2)=7 if p=2.5. The number of lanes=(2p+2)=8 if p=3.
In the manner described above, the number of lanes are determined. In the first embodiment, the number of lanes is determined to be three lanes 6a, 6b, 6c.
Once the number of lanes is determined, a cycle time of each stage is adjusted such that an optimum operation time is allocated thereto, thereby allowing dead time to be reduced. In this manner, the number of lanes can be efficiently determined and time can be efficiently allocated.
The carry-out stage 5 is provided with the carry-out robot 13 capable of carrying out wheels 14 processed, in the processing stage 4, from an end of the slide device 7. The carry-out robot 13 typically is an articulated robot that is capable of carrying out any of the wheels 14 fixed to the plurality of fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c onto an output inspection device 29. Each of the wheels 14 carried out onto the output inspection device 29 is inspected to determine whether or not a break caliper hits the wheel 14. Upon completion of inspection by the output inspection device 29, the wheels 14 are conveyed out by a conveyor 30. The output inspection device 29 may be any device that is capable of inspecting, measuring, and finishing an inspected portion of a workpiece.
Like the carry-in robot 10 in the carry-in stage 2, the carry-out device in the carry-out stage 5 is comprised of an articulated robot, such that the number of devices necessary for carrying out the workpieces from the plurality of lanes 6a, 6b, 6c and inspecting and positioning the workpieces as the workpieces are carried out can be minimized.
As described above, the wheels 14 are measured by the measurement robot 11 to determine a coordinate system for the processing points, for example, and conveyed to the processing stage 4 by the slide device 7 and, for these wheels 14, the measurement robot 11 and the welding robots 12 are separately provided. Therefore, it is difficult to make the coordinate system determined by the measurement robot 11 identical to the coordinate system used by the welding robots 12.
As shown in the drawings, the welding robots 12 are each provided with a final position error determination system (also be referred to as a final position error determination means) for determining a coordinate system of a workpiece measurement portion 31 to be finally processed with respect to the coordinate system determined by the measurement robot 11 before a welding operation is performed by the welding robots 12.
One embodiment of the final position error determination system may comprise an error measurement device (also referred to as an error measurement means) of a welding robot 12 for measuring errors between desired points and points actually reached by the welding robot 12 when the welding robot 12 is driven in a prescribed orientation to perform processing based on a plurality of measurement point data at which a welding robot is configured to perform processing measured in the measurement stage 3, a driving device (also referred to as driving means) configured to drive the welding robot 12 based on a plurality of measurement point data at which a welding robot is configured to perform processing, to sequentially measure the errors, a compensation table created by the controller associated with the welding robot for storing compensation data corresponding to the robot positions calculated from the error data measured by the error measurement device (also referred to as error measurement means), wherein the driving device is a compensation-based driving device (compensation-based driving means) configured to precisely operate the welding robot 12 based on a plurality of measurement point data at which a welding robot is configured to perform processing and using the compensation table. It will be understood that “driving” is used herein to mean moving or actuating the welding robot, and that the driving device may be implemented by the controller and configured to send signals to the welding robot to “drive” or actuate the robot.
Another embodiment of the final position error determination system (final position error determination means) may comprise a position data generation device (position data generation means) for newly generating a plurality of measurement point data based on which a welding robot is driven, by slightly changing or adjusting a tip end position of the welding robot 12 in a predetermined direction while keeping a tool orientation of a welding robot 12 unchanged, a driving device (driving means) configured to drive the welding robot 12 based on the measurement point data, an error measurement device (error measurement means), a compensation table created by the controller associated with the welding robot for storing compensation data corresponding to robot positions calculated from the error data measured by the error measurement device, wherein the driving device is a compensation-based driving device (compensation-based driving means) for precisely operating the welding robot 12 based on a plurality of measurement point data at which a welding robot is configured to perform processing and using the compensation table.
Another embodiment of the final position error determination system (final position error determination means) may comprise an error measurement device (error measurement means) of a welding robot 12 for measuring errors between desired points and points actually reached by the welding robot 12 by slightly changing a tool orientation of the welding robot 12 in a predetermined direction while keeping a tip end of the welding robot 12 unchanged, a driving device (driving means) for driving the welding robot 12 based on a plurality of measurement point data at which a welding robot is configured to perform processing to sequentially measure the errors, a position data generation system (position data generation means) for newly generating a plurality of measurement point data based on which a welding robot is driven by slightly changing the tip end of the welding robot 12 in a predetermined direction while keeping a tool orientation of the welding robot 12 unchanged, wherein the driving device (driving means) is configured to drive the welding robot 12 based on the measurement point data, an error measurement device (error measurement means) for measuring errors, and a compensation table created by the controller for storing compensation data corresponding to the robot positions calculated from the error data measured by the error measurement device, wherein the driving device is a compensation-based driving device (compensation-based driving means) for precisely operating the welding robot 12 based on a plurality of measurement point data at which a welding robot is configured to perform processing and using the compensation table.
In the above embodiment, as the final position error determination system (final position error determination means), touch sensing detection that utilizes a welding torch 22 provided at the tip end of the welding robot 12, and visual recognition detection that utilizes a visual sensor provided at the tip end of the welding robot 12 may be employed, as described below.
In the touch sensing detection embodiment shown in
The welding robot 12 converts values actually measured in the measurement stage 3 (reference points for touch sensing) based on the relative relationship, and when the welding robot is driven, final position errors are obtained by touch sensing as operation paths (Xt, Yt) (in this example, starting from portion B). In the touch sensing, an actual coordinate system is obtained by abutting a tip end of a welding torch 22 having a pre-set coordinate point to a wheel 14 using a welding robot 12. In this manner, errors are measured by touch sensing. With the touch sensing thus performed, groove precision can be compensated for, accurately, to the order of a fraction of a millimeter.
The final position errors thus obtained can be applied to later processing by creating an error compensation table from the operation paths (Xt, Yt). Use of touch sensing to determine and compensate for errors between actual positions and calculated positions enables highly precise compensation data to be tabulated. This compensation table is newly created when the type of workpiece is changed.
Furthermore, use of the touch sensing enables a compensation table to be created precisely and simply, thereby improving processing precision, even if the measurement robot 11 and the welding robots 12 are provided separately from each other.
The processing precision can be further improved by creating not only a compensation table for a typical processing movement at a processing point (workpiece measurement portion) but also a compensation table for slightly different positions in a vicinity thereof.
On the other hand, as shown in
Where arc welding, for example, is performed by the above welding robot 12, a time required to create a compensation table can be significantly shortened if the visual sensor 32 serving as an error measurement device (error measurement means), whose field of view is within a vicinity of a position of the tip end of the tool of the welding robot 12, can be reproducibly and detachably attached to the tip end of the tool of the welding robot 12, if touch sensing is used only for the purpose of the calibration of the tip end of the tool, and if position information 33 of the visual sensor 22 is used for the error measurement. The visual sensor 22 may be calibrated using touch sensing.
Although touch sensing is precise, such measurements take a long time. Therefore, use of a visual sensor 32 calibrated using touch sensing enables creation of a compensation table that is as precise as that obtained by touch sensing at high speed.
Use of a model workpiece having a size identical to that of an actual workpiece and a measurement portion finished precisely for creation of a compensation table enables the measurement precision of the touch sensing and the visual sensor to be improved, the creation time of the compensation table to be shortened, and the compensation table to be created more precisely.
The above embodiment ensures processing accuracy while providing the advantage of eliminating negative influences that may be transferred between the measurement and the processing due to the separation of the measurement robot 11 and the welding robots 12.
As shown in the drawing, the wheels 14 conveyed into the carry-in stage 2 are each carried by the carry-in robot 10 onto one of fixing jigs 8a, 8b, and 8c, which are mounted on respective lanes 6a, 6b, and 6c of a slide device 7, in this order from top to bottom. The wheels 14 are conveyed by the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, and 8c to the measurement stage 3 along the slide device 7, where a workpiece measurement portion of each of the wheels 14 is measured by the measurement robot 11. Upon completion of the measurement, the wheels 14 are conveyed to a processing stage 4 along the slide device 7, where predetermined welding is performed by welding robots 12 to the wheels 14. Upon completion of the welding, the wheels 14 are sequentially conveyed to the carry-out stage 5, where the wheels 14 are carried out by the carry-out robot 13 from the carry-out stage 5. Measurements and processing are sequentially performed by repeating the above described steps in the order of (a), (b), and (c) in
The above operations as well as the inspection of processing results can be automated. Furthermore, when the workpiece is changed, position changes can be done quickly and inexpensively.
Consequently, the measurement device and the processing devices are efficiently operated to thereby reduce cycle time, and the number of fixing jigs 8a, 8b, and 8c requiring high precision is decreased, thus reducing costs and minimizing the time required for tooling changes associated with changing the type of workpiece. Moreover, even if some of the fixing jigs 8a, 8b, 8c fail, the processing can be continued using the remaining fixing jigs.
As shown in the drawing, the operations of “workpiece feed,” “valve hole detection,” “carry-in by carry-in robot,” “lane 6a: measurement, welding,” “lane 6b: measurement, welding,” “lane 6c: measurement, welding,” “carry-out by carry-out robot,” and “caliper hit inspection” are performed in this order from lane 6a to lane 6b to lane 6c.
One block shown in the drawing represents approximately 1 second. According to the processing system 1, a cycle time of the caliper hit inspection can be set to 6 seconds as shown in the bottom of the drawing.
Therefore, arc-welding of the steel wheels 14 for an automobile according to this time chart provides for a high speed and high precision processing system capable of achieving a cycle time of 6 seconds for the caliper hit inspection, for example, and thus makes it apparent that operation efficiency can be significantly improved even though the measurement device and the processing devices are provided separately from each other.
As shown in the drawing, in the second embodiment, carry-in and carry-out stages 34 are located in left and right sides of the drawing and measurement stages 3 are respectively located inside the carry-in and carry-out stages 34, and a processing stage 4 is located between the measurement stages 3. Slide devices 7 are respectively provided between one of the measurement stages 3 and the processing stage 4 and between the other of the measurement stages 3 and the processing stage 4. In this embodiment, the left and right side slide devices 7 are each comprised of one of lanes 6a, 6b. While, in the second embodiment, the slide devices 7 comprising the left and right side lanes 6a, 6b are shown as an example, the number of lanes may be more than one for each side and not limited to the present embodiment.
The carry-in and carry-out stages 34 are respectively provided with carry-in and carry-out robots 35 which are respectively carry-in and carry-out devices, the measurement stages 3 are provided with the measurement robots which are measurement devices, and the processing stage is provided with the welding robots 12 which are processing devices. These carry-in and carry-out robots 35, measurement robots 11, and welding robots 12 are arranged so as to sequentially measure and weld wheels 14 conveyed inwardly and alternately by the left and right side slide devices. These carry-in and carry-out robots 35, measurement robots 11, and welding robots 12 are controlled such that the right side and the left side operate in a coordinated manner. Reference numeral 36 designates input and output inspection devices, each of which has both functions of the input inspection device 16 and the output inspection device 29 of the first embodiment.
In the above embodiment, a shielding device 27 is provided between the left and right side slide devices 7, and shielding devices 25 are also respectively provided between one of the measurement stages 3 and the processing stage 4 and between the other of the measurement stages 3 and the processing stage 4.
In the above embodiment, like the first embodiment, a final error determination system (final error determination means) for determining final positional errors of a workpiece measurement portion 31 from a coordinate system determined in each of the measurement stage 3 and a coordinate system determined in the processing stage 4 is provided. Since the structures of the final error determination system are identical to the structures of the first embodiment, no further explanation will be provided.
According to the processing system 38 of the second embodiment constructed as described above, wheels 14 are welded in a manner described below.
Wheels 14 carried into the carry-in and carry-out stages 34 from the left and right sides of the drawing are inspected by the input and output inspection devices 36 to determine the position of valve holes thereof, which in turn determine coordinate systems thereof as the wheels 14 are carried in. These wheels 14 are carried by the carry-in and carry-out robots 35 and placed onto fixing jigs 8a, 8b of the slide devices 7. The wheels 14 carried and placed onto these fixing jigs 8a, 8b are measured by the measurement robots 11 in the measurement stage 3 to determine coordinate systems of workpiece measurement portions thereof, then conveyed to the process stage 4, and welded by the welding robots 12. Like the first embodiment, a compensation table for final position errors is created and the coordinate system for processing points is modified.
In the above embodiment, the wheels 14 conveyed into the processing stage 4 can be simultaneously welded by the four welding robots 12 shown in the left and right side of the drawing.
The wheels 14 thus welded are conveyed back into the measurement stages 3 from the processing stage 4 by the slide devices 7. The wheels 14 conveyed back to ends of the measurement stages 3 are carried out onto the input and output inspection devices 36 by the carry-in and carry-out robots 13. The wheels 14 carried out onto the input and output inspection devices 36 are inspected to determine whether or not a caliper hits the wheels 14. Upon completion of the inspection, the wheels 14 are conveyed out by carry-in and carry-out conveyors 37.
In the second embodiment, operations between the left and right sides of the processing system as shown in the drawing are progressed in a coordinated manner. The wheels 14 are sequentially conveyed into the processing stage 4, welded by the welding robots 12, and conveyed into the measurements stages 3. After the wheels 14 are carried out from the input and output inspection devices 36, new wheels 14 are carried onto the input and output inspection devices 36, conveyed for welding, and so on. In the second embodiment, even if one of the left and right fixing jigs 8a, 8b fails, the processing can be continued by using the other one of the fixing jigs to convey the wheels 14 (workpieces) along a corresponding one of the slide devices 7.
Determination of which embodiment of the processing system (processing system 38 as in the second embodiment or processing system 1 as in the first embodiment) should be employed depends on the conditions such as installation space, the type of workpiece, etc.
In the above embodiments, a steel wheel 14 for an automobile is employed as an example of the workpiece, however, it will be appreciated that the workpiece need not be limited to a steel wheel for an automobile.
Numerous modifications and alternative embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the forgoing description. Accordingly, the description is to be construed as illustrative only, and is provided for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the best mode of carrying out the invention. The details of the structure and/or function may be varied substantially without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005-008765 | Jan 2005 | JP | national |