The present disclosure relates to a tape feed apparatus and method for a self-piercing rivet machine.
This section provides background information related to the present disclosure which is not necessarily prior art.
Existing tape feed systems for self-piercing rivet machines typically have a ratcheting wheel between the self-piercing rivet fastener supply reel and the receiver. The exhausted tape leaving the receiver is typically left as a free end and allowed to fall on the floor. Cleaning up this exhausted tape can cost a surprisingly large amount of money for a manufacturer to clean up; hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions of dollars annually.
This section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, a tape carried, self-pierce rivet may be moved into alignment with a rivet driving spindle by conveying the tape between a supply reel and an exhaust reel, the supply reel having a supply motor and the exhaust reel having an exhaust motor. Specifically, the tape is moved in an advancing direction until the rivet has traveled past being in alignment with the spindle, by controlling the supply and exhaust motors using a first tension regimen. Thereafter the tape is moved in a retracting direction until the rivet is in alignment with the spindle by controlling the tape supply and exhaust motors using a second tension regimen.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
Rivets to be applied are first installed on an elongated tape, in a spaced apart configuration as illustrated in
The elongated tape 44 is supplied, wound up on a supply reel 36. The supply reel is installed on the spindle of a supply motor 48, which is preferably implemented using a servomotor. The rivet machine also includes an exhaust reel 38 to receive the spent tape, thus solving the problem of having the spent tape exhaust onto the floor. The exhaust reel is carried on the spindle of an exhaust motor, also preferably implemented using a servomotor. To sense when the end of the portion of the tape containing rivets has been reached, an inductive sensor 77 is provided downstream of the supply reel but upstream of the punching zone. To sense when a rivet is positioned approximately within the punching zone, a rivet-present sensor 78 is employed. In the illustrated embodiment this sensor is an inductive sensor available from Turck, Inc. Note the sensor 78 is positioned so that it will not interfere with reciprocating movement of the rivet punch.
The sensor 78 is designed to sense the presence of metal rivets with precision. As manufacturing with lighter materials is in demand today, the present inductive sensor is designed to sense rivets that are not necessarily made of ferrous metals, such as rivets made of aluminum. The inductive sensor has an internal inductive coil that is energized by an oscillator which produces an electromagnetic detection field emanating from the tip of the sensor. The presence of a metal object (such as the head of rivet 32) in the detection field alters the permeability of the space occupied by the detection field. This change in permeability results in a change in resonance of the oscillating energy, which is then sensed by the internal electronic circuitry associated with the oscillator. Although ferrous metals produce the strongest coupling with the detection field, other metals such as aluminum also produce changes in the detection field, which can be measured by the sensor.
Sensor 78 thus operates as a non-contact electromagnetic sensor. While the inductive sensor is well adapted to sensing non-ferrous rivets, such as aluminum rivets, other types of sensing technology can also be employed. Optical sensors, another form of electromagnetic sensing, for example, can be used where the rivet material is not suitable for inductive sensing.
In the disclosed embodiment, the sensor 78 is positioned at an angle, as illustrated, so that it can sense when the head of rivet 32 has traveled past the position where it is aligned with the centerline 34. The disclosed processor-controlled tape feed apparatus and method specifically relies on having the rivet advance slightly past the point of perfect centerline alignment during the tape advancement tension regimen, so that the rivet can be retracted into perfect centerline alignment during the subsequent retracting tension regimen. It is the subsequent retracting tension regimen that allows the pawl mechanism 64 to engage with the corresponding aperture 58 in the tape 44. In this way, high accuracy is achieved in placement of the rivet directly in registration with the punch centerline without requiring the machine itself to be manufactured to high tolerances. This is because accuracy is achieved by virtue of the high tolerance of the tape.
In this embodiment one primary function of the digital command controller 101 is to send commands to the spindle driver 24 (
In this embodiment each of the supply servomotor 48 and the exhaust servomotor 54 may be implemented using a self-contained controller-motor package that includes a communication port 107 designed to interface with the CAN bus 105. A suitable motor package is the model PD4-C6018L4204-E-08 available from Nanotec Electronic US Inc. The digital command controller 101 also has a communication port 109 to interface with the CAN bus 105. Essentially each self-contained controller-motor package receives control data signals, addressed for it, on the CAN bus 105. The motor responds by rotating to the position specified by control data placed on the CAN bus 105. By virtue of the CAN bus interconnection, each of the respective servomotors can be controlled independently of one another through instructions from the digital command controller that are addressed for the particular servomotor.
As illustrated in
The circuit of
In one embodiment, the supply and exhaust reels are secured by solenoid(s) 117 controlled by the digital command controller 101. Status LED indicators 119 are provided to visually indicate the tape loading state. Solenoids 117 and status LEDs 119 are controlled by connection to the digital command controller 101.
Each servomotor includes a motor to produce torque in varying amounts based on received control signals from the processor 102. In addition, each servomotor includes a position sensor to provide a feedback signal through the servomotor control circuit to the processor 102. Knowing the position of the servomotor allows the processor to precisely control the servomotor's operation. This includes controlling the torque supplied by the motor, which some of the disclosed control regimens are able to exploit.
The processor 102 is also coupled to the sensor driver 108 which interfaces with the inductive sensor 78. The processor reads the signals produced by sensor 78 to determine if a rivet is positioned at the point slightly beyond centerline registration, indicating that the processor can command a change from the advancing tape tension regimen to the retracting tape tension regimen. A discussion of the advancing and retracting tape tension regimens will not be provided.
Overall System Process
The advancement of the tape is a processor-controlled process, the processor being specifically programmed as described herein.
Regarding this stored knowledge, the processor maintains a record in memory 104 as to whether the last rivet cycle resulted in a rivet being set in the workpiece. This record is maintained because certain faults can happen before the rivet is inserted into the work piece thereby leaving the rivet inside the nose piece. In this scenario the processor is programmed not to advance the tape because if the process is retried two rivets will be deployed in the receiver. If the processor determines that it doesn't need to advance it will simply maintain the positive location of the tape in its current position.
In performing the overall system process the processor 102 is also programmed to assess at step 208 whether a tape change is necessary. This happens when the last rivet in the tape has been used and the end of the tape is sensed by suitable mechanism. In the illustrated embodiment of
Instead of using a rivet sensor 77, the end-of-tape condition may be sensed by detecting that there is no load on the supply servomotor 48, or by using a suitable microswitch sensor, magnetic sensor or optical sensor to detect an end-of-tape marker or detent formed in the tape itself. Regardless of what sensing mechanism is used, when the end-of-tape condition is sensed, the processor 102 sends control commands, at step 210 to the servomotors 48 and 54 to disengage or enter an off state, to allow the tool operator to place a fresh reel of tape on the spindle of the supply motor 48 and to thread the fresh tape onto a newly installed exhaust reel. To alert the operator when it is time to replace the tape, the processor 102 may also issue an alert (e.g., audible or visual) locally at the machine, using the status LED's 119 (
Assuming no tape change is required (either because the current tape still has unspent rivets, or because a fresh reel has just been loaded) the processor 102 makes the fundamental decision at 212 whether a tape feed operation should be performed. As the flowchart of
In alternate embodiments (using the circuit of
Advance Tape Process
The advance tape process 206 is shown in detail in
Alternatively this can be achieved by turning off the holding torque of the supply motor while the spindle 26 (
As yet another alternative, a higher torque may be used on the exhaust motor 54 to advance the tape without the need for slack to be created.
In order for the system to advance the tape, the processor 102 then switches the motors into an adaptive torque mode, one embodiment of which is illustrated in
Continuing with a discussion of the advance tape process, after the processor switches to adaptive torque mode, it waits at step 222 until a rivet is detected by the rivet-present sensor 78. Specifically, the processor waits until the rivet-present signal is in the ON state. Upon detection of the ON state, the processor, at step 224, sends an instruction to the exhaust servomotor, causing it to switch to a low torque state to prevent slack. Thereafter, in step 226, the processor sends a signal to the supply servomotor, causing it to switch to a high torque state, which will pull back on the tape allowing the pawl mechanism 64 to engage with the corresponding aperture 58 in the tape 44 (
Next follows a summary of three potential methods that can be employed to drive the system into adaptive torque mode. All of these methods adjust the tension of the tape as it enters the receiver, to consistently align the rivet under the punch as the tape transitions from full to empty on the supply side and vice versa on the exhaust side. These techniques for implementing an adaptive torque mode are referred to herein as:
1. Simplified Method for Adaptive Reel Tensioning (SMART)
2. Rivet Count Method
3. Running Average Method
Simplified Method for Adaptive Reel Tensioning (SMART):
Shown in
In the simplified method 230 the processor 102 turns on torque to a low threshold 232 and then waits a predetermined time 234 (typically on the order of a few milliseconds). After the brief wait, the processor then reads the state of the rivet-present signal (from rivet-present sensor 78) at step 236. If the rivet-present signal is not in the ON state (i.e., it is in the OFF state) the processor 102 signals the motors to increase torque by a predetermined fixed percentage, but without exceeding a predetermined maximum threshold, as at step 238. Conversely, if the rivet-present signal is in the ON state, the simplified method for adaptive reel tensioning ends at 240.
Running Average Method:
Shown, in
As illustrated, the running average method 242 first captures the current position of both motors at 244. In this regard, one feature of the servomotors is that they provide a data signal indicative of angular position of the motor shaft. Next, at step 246, the processor turns on torque to the motors, based on a comparison of a position data running average maintained by the processor 102 in memory 104 to a table of predetermined torque settings also stored in memory 104. These predetermined torque settings may be determined experimentally and stored in a table prior to use of the system.
The processor then waits at step 248 until the rivet-present signal is in the ON state, whereupon the processor captures new positions for both motors and calculates the angle rotated. Using this angle rotated and the known linear distance traveled for such rotation, the processor, at step 250, calculates the approximate diameter of the tape extant on each of the supply and exhaust reels. The processor, at step 252, then adds this calculated value to the running average of the last X advances (where X is an integer number reflecting how many times the motor position data have been captured for use in the described calculations. The running average method then terminates at step 254.
Rivet Count Method:
This method uses data from a processor (possibly separate from processor 102) that is currently running a self-piercing riveting system, such as the Stanley Portariv® Pierce Riveting System, to count the number of rivet cycles since a reel load/change operation has occurred. The processor 102 uses this data to adapt the tension of the supply and exhaust servomotors 48 and 54 to consistently place the rivet under the punch in a tape feed riveting application.
Using one of the three adaptive tension mode methods described above, or equivalent, the tape will continue to be pulled through the receiver until the rivet presence sensor 78 detects that the rivet has completed the required advancement.
The following section provides a summary of “Maintain Torque” subprocess shown in Flowchart 1 which helps to positively lock the rivet in position under the punch until the riveting sequence begins.
Maintain Torque Process
As was discussed in connection with
After the rivet presence sensor detects the presence of rivet in the receiver, the processor commands the exhaust servomotor 54 to switch to a constant low torque, as at 256. This low torque is set to a level that will not overpower the supply servomotor, but to a level sufficient to ensure that all slack is taken up on that side of the receiver and to ensure that the reel won't free spin. The processor further commands the supply servomotor 48, at step 258, to switch to a constant high torque in order to positively align the tape into the locking pawls. The process then ends at 260. Note that although steps 256 and 258 have been illustrated as being sequential, it is possible to execute steps 256 and 258 substantially simultaneously.
The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the disclosure, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1967056 | Horton | Jul 1934 | A |
3208657 | Cohn | Sep 1965 | A |
3456445 | Bentele et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3543987 | Obergfell et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3920130 | Edgett | Nov 1975 | A |
4015799 | Koski et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4089009 | Frazier | May 1978 | A |
4119258 | Ewig, Jr. | Oct 1978 | A |
4133102 | Gillemot | Jan 1979 | A |
4319705 | Geist et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
RE30939 | d'Alayer de Costemore d'Arc et al. | May 1982 | E |
4404742 | Fuhrmeister | Sep 1983 | A |
4410103 | Fuhrmeister | Oct 1983 | A |
4615475 | Fuhrmeister | Oct 1986 | A |
4716124 | Yerman et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4788558 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4942996 | Wolfberg et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5032211 | Shinno et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5184497 | Hanlon et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5191693 | Umetsu | Mar 1993 | A |
5267401 | Freeman et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5339983 | Caple | Aug 1994 | A |
5388721 | Mauer | Feb 1995 | A |
5454900 | Han et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5542323 | Habermehl et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5755519 | Klinefelter | May 1998 | A |
5779127 | Blacket et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5813114 | Blacket et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6089437 | Blacket et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6116835 | Blacket et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6164489 | Altrock | Dec 2000 | A |
6266871 | Edwards | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6502783 | Smith et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6536660 | Blankenship et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6592015 | Gostylla et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6828743 | Debuf | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6942134 | Naito | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963351 | Squires et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7131564 | Matthews et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7212637 | Salisbury | May 2007 | B2 |
7726598 | Morelli et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7896212 | Uejima et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8915460 | Busch et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8950049 | Williams | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9120141 | Clew | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9457921 | Barnes et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
10456826 | Kho | Oct 2019 | B2 |
20040136768 | Klinefelter et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060266869 | Quittkat | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080230646 | Morelli et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080251559 | Uejima et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20130223956 | Gostylla | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140000419 | Park | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140217227 | Kilibarda et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140260831 | Hays et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150101175 | Xi et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0593970 | Apr 1994 | EP |
2498934 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2953772 | Dec 2015 | EP |
WO-9301014 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO-9628266 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 2011058297 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2012046002 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2014124007 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 24, 2019 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/018917. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190255597 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |