Produced sand gravel pack process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9334713
  • Patent Number
    9,334,713
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 17, 2012
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 10, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A borehole completion method treats a formation surrounding a borehole with a chemical treatment that alters how formation particulates interact. A standalone screen deploys downhole in the borehole (either before or after the treatment) on a downhole string. When fluid is produced, formation particulates treated with the chemical treatment agglomerate in the annulus surrounding the screen in permeable structures. This can be especially when the standalone screen is useful in a cased hole having perforations. The chemical treatment includes an inner salt adapted to neutralize the zeta potential (i.e., electrokinetic potential) of the formation particulates so they aggregate into one or more permeable structures in the annulus.
Description
BACKGROUND

Several types of screens are used downhole to filter produced fluids of formation particulates, such as sand. The screens can include wire-wrapped screens, metal-mesh screens, and expandable screens, among others. The screens can be used downhole in a number of completion systems to control sand. In a gravel pack operation, for example, gravel is placed in the annulus around the screen in an open hole. Alternatively, the screen can be run in a stand-alone application without a surrounding gravel pack in either a cased or an open hole.


A stand-alone screen can become plugged and/or may erode rapidly as formation sand and other produced particulates pass through the screen during production. When plugging or erosion occurs, operators need to take remedial steps to clean out and/or replace the screen, which can be time-consuming and costly. Plugging and erosion can be especially problematic when the stand-alone screen is run in a cased hole. For this reason, a stand-alone screen is only rarely run in a cased hole. Yet, being able to run a stand-alone screen in a cased hole may be beneficial in some circumstances and may also be beneficial when using screens in open hole applications.


The subject matter of the present disclosure is directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of, one or more of the problems set forth above.


SUMMARY

A borehole completion method treats a formation surrounding a borehole with a chemical treatment. A standalone screen deploys downhole in the borehole (either before, during, or after the treatment) on a downhole string. Any suitable type of standalone screen can be used, including a wire screen, a mesh screen, a sintered metal screen, a perforated pipe, an expandable screen, a gravel pack screen, or a combination thereof. Typically, packers disposed on the string are used to isolate the screen to particular portions of the borehole.


When fluid is produced from the formation through the screen, formation particulates treated with the chemical treatment are produced with the fluid from the formation, and they agglomerate in the annulus surrounding the screen in permeable structures to form a type of “gravel pack” structure. With the permeable structures formed in the annulus, operators do not need to actively pack the annulus with gravel.


The chemical treatment to agglomerate formation particulates can be especially useful in a cased hole having perforations, but the process may also be beneficial for open hole applications. A standalone screen in a cased hole can be prone to clogging and erosion. Thus, the chemical treatment can be passed through perforations in the casing to treat the surrounding formation. This can be accomplished by injecting the chemical treatment directly in the borehole through the screen, by capillary string, or other conveyance.


The chemical treatment includes an inner salt adapted to modify the zeta potential of the formation particulates. As discussed herein, zeta potential of a particulate refers to the electrokinetic potential of the particulates and is represented by a charge of the particulates' surfaces. To agglomerate the particulates, the chemical treatment neutralizes the zeta potential of the formation particulates so they aggregate into one or more permeable structures in the annulus.


The foregoing summary is not intended to summarize each potential embodiment or every aspect of the present disclosure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a borehole of a formation having a completion string with multiple stand-alone screens.



FIG. 2 illustrates one technique for injecting chemical treatment into the formation.



FIG. 3 illustrates agglomerating of formation particulates treated with the chemical treatment and produced with the fluid from the formation in an annulus surrounding the screen.



FIG. 4 illustrates a process for chemically treating a formation so plugging and erosion can be reduced for stand-alone screens deployed downhole.



FIG. 5 shows the change of zeta potential in silica and ground coal samples when treated with a Zeta Potential Altering System.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In FIG. 1, a completion string 20 has a number of stand-alone screens 30 deployed in a cased hole 10. Packers 22 disposed at various intervals between zones of interest isolate the annulus 14 between the casing 12 and the string 20, and the cased hole 10 has perforations 16 communicating with the surrounding formation of these zones. As fluid is produced from the formation, the produced fluid can pass through the perforations 16 into the borehole annulus 14. In turn, the produced fluid can enter the screens 30 and be produced up the string 20 at various wellhead components 26. As shown, a mechanical barrier 24 can be disposed downhole of the string 20 to isolate the bottom of the cased hole 10.


The screens 30 used can include any of the conventional screens used for gravel pack operations, frac pack operations, or wellscreen operations. Therefore, the screens 30 can use wrapped wire, sintered metal, mesh, perforated pipe, ceramic screens, and other components.


During production (60), fluid is produced from the formation through the casing's perforations 16. As this process proceeds, formation sand and other particulates may tend to plug and/or erode the screens 30, and this may be accelerated by virtue of the perforations 16 in the cased hole 10. To reduce the chances of plugging and erosion, the completion has a chemical treatment (50) applied to surrounding portions or areas 40 of the formation according to the procedures disclosed herein. (FIG. 2, which is discussed below, shows one technique for treating areas 40 of the formation with the chemical treatment (50).) These treated areas 40 can extend into the surrounding formation as shown. The actual extent of these treated areas 40 may vary depending on how much chemical treatment is applied, characteristics of the formation, and other factors.


In any event, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 3, produced fluid 60 exits the treated formation area 40 through the perforations 16, sand and other particulates produced with the fluid will tend to collect in the annulus 14 surrounding the screen 30 and the casing 12. Left alone, these formation particulates would tend to plug and erode the screens 30. Being chemically treated, however, the collected formation particulate is intended to have a significant amount of permeability that tends to reduce plugging and erosion. Moreover, the chemically treated formation particulate agglomerates together in the annulus 14 to form one or more permeable structures 42 for filtering produced fluids and reducing plugging and erosion of the screens 30. In other words, these permeable structures 42 can act as a gravel pack formed from the produced sand and particulate in the annulus 14 around the screen 30 without the structures 42 being formally placed there through gravel packing operations.


Although the chemical treatment (50) is applied to the cased hole 10 in which the stand-alone screens 30 are used, the teachings of the present disclosure can be used in open holes in which stand-alone screens are used. Moreover, the borehole 10 may have a combination of cased and open hole sections as found in the art.


Still referring to the components in FIGS. 1 and 3, discussion now turns to the flowchart in FIG. 4, which shows a process 100 for chemically treating the surrounding formation to reduce plugging and erosion for stand-alone screens 30. Initially, the completion string 20 is deployed in the borehole 10 and has a number of packers 22 and stand-alone screens 30 on the production tubing (Block 102). The packers 22 can then be activated to isolate the zones of interest in the formation from one another according to customary procedures (Block 104).


A chemical treatment (50) is then applied downhole so that it permeates into the surrounding formation (Block 106). As noted above, the borehole 10 through the formation may have a cased hole with perforations 16 or may be an open hole. In general, the treatment (50) can be applied before, during, and/or after the screens 30 and completion string 20 have been deployed. Accordingly, the procedure for treating the formation can use any of the available methods depending on what tools can be deployed, how the chemical treatment (50) can be conveyed downhole, and other factors known in the art. Thus, standard chemical injection procedures can be used to apply the chemical treatment (50). Some of these standard chemical injection procedures can involve pumping the treatment (50) directly down the completion string 20, applying the treatment (50) with a capillary or workstring deployed in the completion string 20, or other techniques.


When the chemical treatment (50) is applied after the completion string 20 is run, for example, the chemical additive of the treatment (50) can be pumped down the tubing string 20 so that it exits the screens 30 and enters the formation through the cased hole perforations 16. This chemical additive can even be part of a frac operation used to stimulate the formation.


As one example placement technique shown in FIG. 2, chemical injection uses a “self-diverting” fluid for the chemical treatment 50. This fluid is designed to be very thin and easy to inject into the formation. A capillary or workstring string 28 deployed in the completion string 20 injects the thin fluid for the chemical treatment 50 downhole, and the injected fluid passes out of the screen 30 and through the perforations 16. Entering the formation through the perforations 16, the injected fluid migrates into the surrounding area 40 of the formation. As the thin fluid migrates, the velocity and shear rate of the fluid is reduced, causing the fluid to become more viscous. In turn, the increasing viscosity of the migrating fluid causes the following fluids being injected behind it to be diverted to other parts of the formation in a self-diverting process.


Returning back to FIG. 4, the chemical treatment (50) treats the formation substrate (sand, particulates, etc.) with the chemical additive that allows the formation particulates, if free, to flow or otherwise move towards the screens 30. Yet, as fluids are produced and enter the screens 30 (Block 108), the migrating formation particulates collect in the annulus 14 around the screens 30. However, the previously applied chemical additive prevents the formation particulates from substantially plugging the screens 30 or otherwise preventing the well from flowing by causing the formation particulates to agglomerate and form stable and permeable structures (e.g., 42 in FIG. 3) around the screens 30 (Block 110).


One suitable chemical additive that can be used for this purpose includes a Zeta Potential Altering System (hereafter called ZPAS). This type of chemical additive alters the Zeta potential of the downhole formation substrate so that formation particulates are attracted to each other. Zeta potential refers to the electrokinetic potential of the particulates and is represented by a charge of the particulates' surfaces.


The Zeta Potential Altering System (ZPAS) used for the chemical treatment (50) of the present disclosure can be a chemical additive based on an inner salt that modifies the zeta potential of the particulates. In particular, the system changes the particulates' charge towards neutral values, which enhances the agglomeration of the particulates.


Further details of the chemical additive for the Zeta Potential Altering System can be found in D. Johnson, et al., “Enhancing Gas and Oil Production With Zeta Potential Altering System,” SPE 128048 (2010), which is discussed below. Other possible chemical additives could be used that alter the electrokinetic potential of the particulates.


As specifically discussed in SPE 128048, a Zeta Potential Altering System (ZPAS) can be used in hydraulic fracturing treatments. The system minimizes proppant flow back, controls fines migration, enhances fluid load recovery, and inhibits calcium carbonate scale formation. The Zeta Potential Altering System is based on an inner salt and modifies the zeta potential of particles such as fracture sand and formation substrate, changing the charge towards neutral values and therefore enhancing particle agglomeration. As also discussed in SPE 128048, formations can be treated by incorporating the chemical additive into stimulation fluids, and the chemical additive can be applied using several fluid systems to deliver the product.


As discussed in SPE 128048, Zeta Potential is defined by the charge that develops at the interface in the boundary of hydrodynamic shear between solid surfaces as a product of the electrostatic repulsion and the attractive forces related to the Van der Waals' forces. Therefore, zeta potential is a function of the surface charge of the particle, any adsorbed layer at the interface, and the nature and composition or the surrounding suspension medium. In other words, zeta potential can be affected by changes in pH, conductivity of the medium (salinity and kind of salt), and concentration of particular additives (polymer, non-ionic surfactants, etc.). Particles with zeta potential values between −20 and 20 mV have an effective charge low enough that the repulsion between them is lowered to a point where aggregation occurs.


As discussed in SPE 128048, the active ingredient of the Zeta Potential Altering System is an inner salt of a very low-molecular weight polymer. When added to fracture water as discussed in SPE 128048, the inner salt disperses and rapidly coats any metal oxide substrate, such as proppant or subterranean formation. The system also contains a penetrating alcohol capable of disrupting the water layer that coats solid surfaces in the formation. The system does not modify the chemical structure of friction reducers and gelling systems, such as non-ionic, cationic, and anionic polyacrylamide and guar gums and derivatives so the system is compatible with slick-water systems and borate-based crosslinked gels.


SPE 128048 provides a Figrure, reproduced here as FIG. 5, showing the change in the zeta potential in 325 mesh silica and in ground coal samples when treated at concentrations of 6 gal of ZPAS per 1,000 lb of silica or of coal material. In both cases, the ZPAS increases the mean zeta potential of the particles towards more neutral values with a lower standard deviation. The resulting values are in the zeta potential range where higher agglomerating effects are expected.


The particular aspects of the chemical additive applied in the chemical treatment 50 may depend on the expected chemistry downhole, including considerations of temperature, pressure, type of produce fluid, expected size of formation particulates, expected types of formation substrate, etc. Being able to treat the formation so that formation particulates form permeable, stable structures around the stand-alone screens 30 can eliminate the need to actively pack the annulus with gravel in a gravel pack operation. Moreover, the disclosed techniques can allow expandable sand screens (ESS) to be run in a cased hole, which can have advantages in some implementations. Use of the chemical treatment can also allow stand-alone screens 30 that have larger outside and inside dimensions to be installed downhole.


Treating the formation with chemical additive according to the present disclosure can preferably be done before or at the time of first production. Depending on the implementation, additional additive may be needed to continue to create or maintain the permeable structure in the annulus.


The foregoing description of preferred and other embodiments is not intended to limit or restrict the scope or applicability of the inventive concepts conceived of by the Applicants. In exchange for disclosing the inventive concepts contained herein, the Applicants desire all patent rights afforded by the appended claims. Therefore, it is intended that the appended claims include all modifications and alterations to the full extent that they come within the scope of the following claims or the equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A borehole completion method, comprising; treating a formation surrounding a borehole with a chemical treatment by passing the chemical treatment through a perforation in a casing of the borehole;deploying a screen in the borehole;allowing formation particulates to migrate to an annulus surrounding the screen by initially producing fluid from the formation;agglomerating the formation particulates treated with the chemical treatment and produced with the fluid from the formation;forming a gravel pack structure in the annulus surrounding the screen with the agglomerated formation particulates; andsubsequently producing the fluid from the formation through the formed gravel pack structure and the screen.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein deploying the screen comprises deploying the screen before treating the formation, after treating the formation, during treatment of the formation, or a combination thereof.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein treating the formation comprises injecting the chemical treatment directly in the borehole.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the chemical treatment comprises a chemical additive adapted to modify a zeta potential of the formation particulates.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the chemical additive comprises an inner salt adapted to modify the zeta potential of the formation particulates.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the screen comprises a wire screen, a mesh screen, a sintered metal screen, a perforated pipe, an expandable screen, a gravel pack screen, or a combination thereof.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein agglomerating the particulates comprises neutralizing a zeta potential of the formation particulates with the chemical treatment and agglomerating the neutralized zeta potential particulates into one or more permeable structures in the annulus.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising isolating a portion of the formation with a packer disposed on a string having the screen.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, comprising performing the agglomeration of the formation particulates instead of packing the annulus with gravel.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein treating the formation surrounding the borehole with the chemical treatment comprises: injecting the chemical treatment in a fluid into the formation; anddiverting the injected fluid into the formation that follows the fluid already migrating in the formation in response to an increased viscosity of the migrating fluid caused by reduced velocity and shear rate of the migrating fluid.
  • 11. A method of completing a borehole for production, comprising: treating portion of a formation surrounding a borehole with a chemical treatment affecting a surface charge of formation particulates;deploying a screen on a string downhole;allowing formation particulates to migrate to an annulus surrounding the screen by initially producing fluid from the formation; andaggregating the formation particulates produced from the formation into one or more permeable structures in the annulus surrounding the screen by allowing the formation particulates with the affected surface charge to attract to one another; andscreening the produced fluid using the screen and the one or more permeable structures formed in the annulus.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein deploying the screen comprises deploying the screen before treating the formation, after treating the formation, during treatment of the formation, or a combination thereof.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein treating the formation comprises passing the chemical treatment through a perforation in a casing of the borehole.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein treating the formation comprises injecting the chemical treatment directly in the borehole.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the chemical treatment comprises a chemical additive adapted to modify a zeta potential of the formation particulates.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the chemical additive comprises an inner salt adapted to modify the zeta potential of the formation particulates.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the screen comprises a wire screen, a mesh screen, a sintered metal screen, a perforated pipe, an expandable screen, a gravel pack screen, or a combination thereof.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, wherein agglomerating the particulates comprises neutralizing a zeta potential of the formation particulates with the chemical treatment and agglomerating the neutralized zeta potential particulates into the one or more permeable structures in the annulus.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, further comprising isolating a portion of the formation with a packer disposed on a string having the screen.
  • 20. The method of claim 11, comprising performing the agglomeration of the formation particulates instead of packing the annulus with gravel.
  • 21. The method of claim 11, wherein treating the portion of the formation surrounding the borehole with the chemical treatment affecting the surface charge of the formation particulates comprises: injecting the chemical treatment in a fluid into the formation; anddiverting the injected fluid into the formation that follows the fluid already migrating in the formation in response to an increased viscosity of the migrating fluid caused by reduced velocity and shear rate of the migrating fluid.
  • 22. A borehole completion method, comprising: treating a formation surrounding a borehole with a chemical treatment;deploying a screen in the borehole, wherein the screen comprises a wire screen, a mesh screen, a sintered metal screen, a perforated pipe, an expandable screen, a gravel pack screen, or a combination thereof;allowing formation particulates to migrate to an annulus surrounding the screen by initially producing fluid from the formation;agglomerating the formation particulates treated with the chemical treatment and produced with the fluid from the formation;forming a gravel pack structure in the annulus surrounding the screen with the agglomerated formation particulates; andsubsequently producing the fluid from the formation through the formed gravel pack structure and the screen.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein deploying the screen comprises deploying the screen before treating the formation, after treating the formation, during treatment of the formation, or a combination thereof.
  • 24. The method of claim 22, wherein treating the formation comprises injecting the chemical treatment directly in the borehole.
  • 25. The method of claim 22, wherein the chemical treatment comprises a chemical additive adapted to modify a zeta potential of the formation particulates.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the chemical additive comprises an inner salt adapted to modify the zeta potential of the formation particulates.
  • 27. The method of claim 22, wherein agglomerating the particulates comprises neutralizing a zeta potential of the formation particulates with the chemical treatment and agglomerating the neutralized zeta potential particulates into one or more permeable structures in the annulus.
  • 28. The method of claim 22, further comprising isolating a portion of the formation with a packer disposed on a string having the screen.
  • 29. The method of claim 22, comprising performing the agglomeration of the formation particulates instead of packing the annulus with gravel.
  • 30. The method of claim 22, wherein treating the formation surrounding the borehole with the chemical treatment comprises: injecting the chemical treatment in a fluid into the formation; anddiverting the injected fluid into the formation that follows the fluid already migrating in the formation in response to an increased viscosity of the migrating fluid caused by reduced velocity and shear rate of the migrating fluid.
  • 31. A borehole completion method, comprising: treating a formation surrounding a borehole with a chemical treatment;deploying a screen in the borehole;isolating a portion of the formation with a packer disposed on a string having the screen;allowing formation particulates to migrate to an annulus surrounding the screen by initially producing fluid from the formation;agglomerating the formation particulates treated with the chemical treatment and produced with the fluid from the formation;forming a gravel pack structure in the annulus surrounding the screen with the agglomerated formation particulates; andsubsequently producing the fluid from the formation through the formed gravel pack structure and the screen.
  • 32. The method of claim 31, wherein deploying the screen comprises deploying the screen before treating the formation, after treating the formation, during treatment of the formation, or a combination thereof.
  • 33. The method of claim 31, wherein treating the formation comprises injecting the chemical treatment directly in the borehole.
  • 34. The method of claim 31, wherein the chemical treatment comprises a chemical additive adapted to modify a zeta potential of the formation particulates.
  • 35. The method of claim 34, wherein the chemical additive comprises an inner salt adapted to modify the zeta potential of the formation particulates.
  • 36. The method of claim 31, wherein agglomerating the particulates comprises neutralizing a zeta potential of the formation particulates with the chemical treatment and agglomerating the neutralized zeta potential particulates into one or more permeable structures in the annulus.
  • 37. The method of claim 31, comprising performing the agglomeration of the formation particulates instead of packing the annulus with gravel.
  • 38. The method of claim 31, wherein treating the formation surrounding the borehole with the chemical treatment comprises: injecting the chemical treatment in a fluid into the formation; anddiverting the injected fluid into the formation that follows the fluid already migrating in the formation in response to an increased viscosity of the migrating fluid caused by reduced velocity and shear rate of the migrating fluid.
US Referenced Citations (192)
Number Name Date Kind
2196042 Timpson Apr 1940 A
2390153 Kern Dec 1945 A
2805958 Bueche et al. Jul 1959 A
3059909 Wise Oct 1962 A
3088520 Hildebrandt May 1963 A
3163219 Wyant et al. Dec 1964 A
3301723 Chrisp Jan 1967 A
3301848 Halleck Jan 1967 A
3303896 Tillotson et al. Feb 1967 A
3317430 Priestley et al. May 1967 A
3565176 Wittenwyler Feb 1971 A
3637014 Jones Jan 1972 A
3729052 Caldwell Apr 1973 A
3856921 Shrier et al. Dec 1974 A
3888312 Tiner et al. Jun 1975 A
3933205 Kiel Jan 1976 A
3937283 Blauer et al. Feb 1976 A
3960736 Free et al. Jun 1976 A
3965982 Medlin Jun 1976 A
3990978 Hill Nov 1976 A
4007792 Meister Feb 1977 A
4052159 Fuerst et al. Oct 1977 A
4067389 Savins Jan 1978 A
4108782 Thompson Aug 1978 A
4112050 Sartori et al. Sep 1978 A
4112051 Sartori et al. Sep 1978 A
4112052 Sartori et al. Sep 1978 A
4113631 Thompson Sep 1978 A
4378845 Medlin et al. Apr 1983 A
4461716 Barbarin et al. Jul 1984 A
4479041 Fenwick et al. Oct 1984 A
4506734 Nolte Mar 1985 A
4514309 Wadhwa Apr 1985 A
4541935 Constien et al. Sep 1985 A
4549608 Stowe et al. Oct 1985 A
4561985 Glass, Jr. Dec 1985 A
4623021 Stowe Nov 1986 A
4654266 Kachnik Mar 1987 A
4657081 Hodge Apr 1987 A
4660643 Perkins Apr 1987 A
4683068 Kucera Jul 1987 A
4686052 Baranet et al. Aug 1987 A
4695389 Kubala Sep 1987 A
4705113 Perkins Nov 1987 A
4714115 Uhri Dec 1987 A
4718490 Uhri Jan 1988 A
4724905 Uhri Feb 1988 A
4725372 Teot et al. Feb 1988 A
4739834 Peiffer et al. Apr 1988 A
4741401 Walles et al. May 1988 A
4748011 Baize May 1988 A
4779680 Sydansk Oct 1988 A
4795574 Syrinek et al. Jan 1989 A
4817717 Jennings, Jr. et al. Apr 1989 A
4830106 Uhri May 1989 A
4846277 Khalil et al. Jul 1989 A
4848468 Hazlett et al. Jul 1989 A
4852650 Jennings, Jr. et al. Aug 1989 A
4869322 Vogt, Jr. et al. Sep 1989 A
4892147 Jennings, Jr. et al. Jan 1990 A
4926940 Stromswold May 1990 A
4938286 Jennings, Jr. Jul 1990 A
4978512 Dillon Dec 1990 A
5005645 Jennings, Jr. et al. Apr 1991 A
5024276 Borchardt Jun 1991 A
5067556 Fudono et al. Nov 1991 A
5074359 Schmidt Dec 1991 A
5074991 Weers Dec 1991 A
5082579 Dawson Jan 1992 A
5106518 Cooney et al. Apr 1992 A
5110486 Manalastas et al. May 1992 A
5169411 Weers Dec 1992 A
5224546 Smith et al. Jul 1993 A
5228510 Jennings, Jr. et al. Jul 1993 A
5246073 Sandiford et al. Sep 1993 A
5259455 Nimerick et al. Nov 1993 A
5330005 Card et al. Jul 1994 A
5342530 Aften et al. Aug 1994 A
5347004 Rivers et al. Sep 1994 A
5363919 Jennings, Jr. Nov 1994 A
5402846 Jennings, Jr. et al. Apr 1995 A
5411091 Jennings, Jr. May 1995 A
5424284 Patel et al. Jun 1995 A
5439055 Card et al. Aug 1995 A
5462721 Pounds et al. Oct 1995 A
5465792 Dawson et al. Nov 1995 A
5472049 Chaffee et al. Dec 1995 A
5482116 El-Rabaa et al. Jan 1996 A
5488083 Kinsey, III et al. Jan 1996 A
5497831 Hainey et al. Mar 1996 A
5501275 Card et al. Mar 1996 A
5551516 Norman et al. Sep 1996 A
5614010 Smith et al. Mar 1997 A
5624886 Dawson et al. Apr 1997 A
5635458 Lee et al. Jun 1997 A
5649596 Jones et al. Jul 1997 A
5669447 Walker et al. Sep 1997 A
5674377 Sullivan, III et al. Oct 1997 A
5688478 Pounds et al. Nov 1997 A
5693837 Smith et al. Dec 1997 A
5711396 Joerg et al. Jan 1998 A
5722490 Ebinger Mar 1998 A
5744024 Sullivan, III et al. Apr 1998 A
5755286 Ebinger May 1998 A
5775425 Weaver et al. Jul 1998 A
5787986 Weaver et al. Aug 1998 A
5806597 Tjon-Joe-Pin et al. Sep 1998 A
5807812 Smith et al. Sep 1998 A
5833000 Weaver et al. Nov 1998 A
5853048 Weaver et al. Dec 1998 A
5871049 Weaver et al. Feb 1999 A
5877127 Card et al. Mar 1999 A
5908073 Nguyen et al. Jun 1999 A
5908814 Patel et al. Jun 1999 A
5964295 Brown et al. Oct 1999 A
5979557 Card et al. Nov 1999 A
5980845 Cherry Nov 1999 A
6016871 Burts, Jr. Jan 2000 A
6035936 Whalen Mar 2000 A
6047772 Weaver et al. Apr 2000 A
6054417 Graham et al. Apr 2000 A
6059034 Rickards et al. May 2000 A
6060436 Snyder et al. May 2000 A
6069118 Hinkel et al. May 2000 A
6123394 Jeffrey Sep 2000 A
6133205 Jones Oct 2000 A
6147034 Jones et al. Nov 2000 A
6162449 Maier et al. Dec 2000 A
6162766 Muir et al. Dec 2000 A
6169058 Le et al. Jan 2001 B1
6228812 Dawson et al. May 2001 B1
6247543 Patel et al. Jun 2001 B1
6267938 Warrender et al. Jul 2001 B1
6283212 Hinkel et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291405 Lee et al. Sep 2001 B1
6330916 Rickards et al. Dec 2001 B1
6725931 Nguyen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6756345 Pakulski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6793018 Dawson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6832650 Nguyen et al. Dec 2004 B2
6875728 Gupta et al. Apr 2005 B2
7140433 Gatlin et al. Nov 2006 B2
7268100 Kippie et al. Sep 2007 B2
7350579 Gatlin et al. Apr 2008 B2
7392847 Gatlin et al. Jul 2008 B2
7517447 Gatlin Apr 2009 B2
7565933 Kippie et al. Jul 2009 B2
7566686 Kippie et al. Jul 2009 B2
7712535 Venditto et al. May 2010 B2
7767628 Kippie et al. Aug 2010 B2
7829510 Gatlin et al. Nov 2010 B2
7956017 Gatlin et al. Jun 2011 B2
20020049256 Bergeron, Jr. Apr 2002 A1
20020165308 Kinniard et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030220204 Baran, Jr. et al. Nov 2003 A1
20050045330 Nguyen et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050092489 Welton et al. May 2005 A1
20050137114 Gatlin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050250666 Gatlin et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060194700 Gatlin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060219405 Nguyen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070032693 Gatlin et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070131425 Gatlin et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070173413 Lukocs et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173414 Wilson, Jr. Jul 2007 A1
20080011478 Welton et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080197085 Wanner et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080251252 Schwartz Oct 2008 A1
20080257553 Gatlin et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080257554 Zamora et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269082 Wilson, Jr. et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080283242 Ekstrand et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080287325 Thompson et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080314124 Sweeney et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080318812 Kakadjian et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090067931 Curr et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090151959 Darnell et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090173497 Dusterhoft Jul 2009 A1
20090200027 Kakadjian et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090200033 Kakadjian et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090203553 Gatlin et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090250659 Gatlin Oct 2009 A1
20100000795 Kakadjian et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012901 Falana et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100077938 Zamora et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100122815 Zamora et al. May 2010 A1
20100181071 van Petegen Jul 2010 A1
20100197968 Falana et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100212905 van Petegem et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100252262 Ekstrand et al. Oct 2010 A1
20120043082 Nguyen et al. Feb 2012 A1
20130075100 Veldman et al. Mar 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
2125513 Jan 1995 CA
4027300 May 1992 DE
775376 Oct 1954 GB
1073338 Jun 1967 GB
10001461 Jun 1988 JP
08151422 Nov 1996 JP
10110115 Apr 1998 JP
2005194148 Jul 2005 JP
WO 9856497 Dec 1998 WO
9905385 Feb 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
SPE International, Central AR, “Enchancing Gas and Oil Production with Zeta Potential Altering System—SPE128048”, Feb. 24, 2011, Faulkner County Natural Resource Center, 110 S. Amity Rd., Conway, AR 72032.
SPE International, Central Arkansas Study Group, Neswletter—“Presentation on Zeta Potential Altering System for Hudraulic Fracturing on Feb. 24”, pp. 1-4, vol. 3, Issue 4, Copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved.
Johnson, D et al., “Enchancing Gas and Oil Production with Zeta Potential Altering System”, SPE 128048, Copyright 2010, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Kakadijan, Sarkis et al., “Zeta Potential Altering System for Increased Fluid Recovery, Production, and Fines Control”, SPE 106112, Copyright 2007, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/750,335, filed Mar. 30, 2010, Parker.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,805, filed May 28, 2009, Falana et al.
Related Publications (2)
Number Date Country
20140102702 A1 Apr 2014 US
20140202694 A9 Jul 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61146386 Jan 2009 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11298547 Dec 2005 US
Child 12151429 US
Parent 11298556 Dec 2005 US
Child 12075461 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12690292 Jan 2010 US
Child 13653690 US
Parent 12151429 May 2008 US
Child 12690292 US
Parent 12075461 Mar 2008 US
Child 12690292 US