Product and method for reducing water loss through soil by seepage

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates broadly to a composition and to a method for reducing the loss of aqueous liquids through permeable ground surfaces. More specifically, this invention relates to a method for reducing seepage loss of water from ponds, irrigation ditches, reservoirs, canals and other similar bodies. Even more specifically, this invention relates to a composition having the properties of a binder such that when applied by the method of this invention to ground soils or sands or rocky strata, a strong, water impermeable and flexible mass is formed.
In many areas, water is a raw material of very considerable value. Particularly in areas having little rainfall and no access to ready supply of water, it is imperative to transport and to store water for agricultural and human consumption, without incurring a substantial loss by seepage through soils. In arid areas such as the West and Southwest areas of this country, were soils tend to be sandy and of a very porous and permeable nature, as much as 50% or more of available water supplies may be lost due to seepage through the base surfaces of irrigation ditches, impoundment reservoirs, canals and the like.
Several methods have been developed in the art for impermeabilizing and consolidating ground soils and naturally occurring and synthetically produced porous surfaces such as gravel layers, concrete underlayments, sand and earth masses and other like surfaces encountered in water transfer and impoundment locations. Although prior art methods have met with some success, many problems have been encountered.
One prior art method includes coating the ground surface with gunnite or similar material which is sprayed over a steel mesh and poured in a form positioned in the impoundment area. Although relatively effective from the standpoint of reduction of seepage loss, this technique is very expensive in that it requires substantial construction facilities and labor to impermeabilize a given area of ground surface. Another disadvantage of gunnite surfaces is that they are difficult to repair and where damage occurs due to earth movements, erosion or other mechanical shock, it is necessary to make extensive repairs or rebuild entire areas of the surface.
Another method used to waterproof ground surfaces involves positioning a sheet of vinyl polymeric material over the surface to be waterproofed. This technique has several disadvantages, most notably that it is expensive to acquire and position the vinyl sheet and holes develop in the sheet due to movement of the ground and by penetration of the rocks located therein. The vinyl sheets can be repaired with difficulty especially where holes are involved. The initial and maintenance cost of vinyl sheets are therefore high.
A further technique used by workers to seal ground surfaces in water containment structures includes laying down a pavement of asphalt or other similar waterproofing material. This is an effective procedure, however, it is an expensive one. The areas to be waterproofed must be relatively large and have relatively shallow slopes to insure the proper placement of the material. Another related technique which is also relatively expensive, but is effective to reduce water seepage includes lining the irrigation canal or impoundment area with concrete. The major disadvantages encountered, in addition to the expense, are that the concrete tends to crack and site preparation and repairs entail considerable effort. Other techniques include an application of clay or plastic materials applied to the soils to form a relatively water impervious overlayer. These techniques are relatively inexpensive, but are imperfect because cracks and fissures are easily formed, and depending on water movement have a tendency to part from the soil.
One recently developed method is that disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,236,671 and 3,359,738 to Dybalski et al. In this technique, an aqueous, cationic bituminous emulsion is introduced to water contained in an impoundment or transfer structure and is permitted to settle to the bottom thereof, forming a continuous film adsorbed on the soil or sand particles on the sides and bed of the containment structure. This procedure has the merit of easy application to an existing system and it has the further advantage that the emulsion migrates to and deposits at locations where cracks, holes or fissures have developed. The major disadvantage is that very little if any penetration of the soil is obtained thereby creating a film which is essentially a surface one which is easily damaged or ruptured. In this method, there is no way of accurately calculating the amount of material needed to seal the bottom. Unless an accurate determination of the depth of fissures, cracks, etc. is available, the amount to be applied to the water surface with the assurance that all the ground surfaces are covered cannot be predicted.
It is the primary object of this invention to provide a composition for and a method for applying that composition to natural and man-made ground surfaces in water containment and transfer systems to impermeabilize them.
It is a related object of this invention to provide a composition and method for applying that composition which can be used, as a binder to waterproof different kinds of ground surfaces containing particles of varying sizes and of different compositions.
It is a further and important object of this invention to provide a composition which penetrates and combines with the ground surface to a significant degree to form a tough, flexible and water impervious mass.
It is still a further and equally important object of the present invention to provide a composition which is easily applied to a variety of natural terrains and which does not require a substantial labor force or extensive complex application equipment as do concrete, gunnite, brick lined beds, clay layers, etc. as have been used in the prior art.
It is still a further object of this invention to provide a sealant for impermeabilizing porous ground soils which is long lasting and flexible to conform to movements of ground soils and which is resistant to animal and human traffic.
It is a related and further object of this invention to provide a method for waterproofing ground surfaces which have steep slopes without requiring grading, site preparation or other preparatory operations.
It is a still further object of this invention to provide a composition which can be repaired and reinforced simply and inexpensively by reapplication of a composition over the first waterproofed layer or over any sediment or silt which forms thereover. The secondary application should combine with the initial application or loose soil to form an integral mass.
It is yet a further object of this invention to provide a composition which sets relatively quickly and which is not toxic to plant, animal or human life.
THE INVENTION IN SER. NO. 457,969
In parent application Ser. No. 457,969, compositions and methods are disclosed wherein many of the objects of this invention are achieved. A composition is disclosed which acts as a binder and penetrates and binds together the particles in permeable ground sand and soils so as to form a tough, flexible waterproofing mass. The composition disclosed in Ser. No. 457,969, in its broadest embodiment, comprises an aqueous emulsion of a water insoluble and water dispersible bituminous material in which the bituminous material comprises from 20 to 50% by weight of the emulsion. The bituminous material is present in the emulsion in particles at least 90% of which have a size of less than about 10 microns and is kept in stable cationic emulsion by means of a mixture of cationic emulsifiers comprising from approximately 0.3% to 1.2% by weight of the emulsion. The properties of the emulsion particularly its "break" characteristics are desirably modified and tailored for the purposes of this invention by inclusion of from 0.1 to 1.5% of the emulsion of a nonionic surface active agent. The overall composition additionally contains an acid in an amount sufficient to control the Ph of the composition in the range of approximately 3 to 7.
The compositions disclosed in Ser. No. 457,969 are applied onto a ground surface and as described more fully hereinbelow, the composition penetrates the ground surface to a depth of as much as four inches or more and forms a binder which binds and consolidates into a mass the particles which comprise the ground surface. It has been found that the compositions of the invention can be applied directly to dry soils and that the waterproofing composition which is deposited forms a tough, permanent and flexible structure on steep terrain as well as flat terrain and reduces water seepage by 95% or more. The compositions have been found to set in as little as four hours.
In order to achieve the penetration of a substantial depth of the soil or sand in the bed and at the sides of a natural or man-made body of water, it is necessary to carefully control the "break" of the cationic emulsions in the presence of the siliceous ground material whose particles are known to have negatively charged surface characterisitcs. As is well known in the art of cationic bituminous emulsions, the dispersed particles of bitumen are suspended in the water by means of cationic emulsifying agents. The non-polar portion of the organic cation is readily solubilized in the particle of bitumen whereas the polar end thereof extends into the aqueous medium. The uniformity of orientation of the cationic emulsifier within the particles of bitumen creates a uniform suspension. When these particles come into contact with solid mineral surfaces, which are negatively charged, the forces of attraction contribute to a strong adsorption of the particles of bitumen on the mineral surfaces and thus lead to adhesion of bitumen and soil particles. In order to avoid a breakdown of the emulsion at the moment of contact with solid surfaces, a mixture of cationic emulsifiers having different properties are used. A still further adjustment to the stability of the emulsion is achieved by adding to it a quantity of a nonionic surface active agent. The surface active agent wets the particles of sand or soil and reduces the reactivity of them with the emulsion. The nonionic surface active agent can be deemed a coemulsifier and it performs the dual functions of wetting and activating the surfaces of the solids and modifying and suppressing the breakpoint of the cationic emulsions.
The cationic emulsifiers are those which are known in the art as being effective for forming stable, oil-in-water emulsions of bituminous compounds. These basic emulsifiers are aliphatic amine compounds, more specifically, aliphatic diamine compounds. The compounds are typically employed in the form of a water soluble salt which is obtained by reacting the diamine with a suitable inorganic acid such as hydrochloric acid. Preferred basic emulsifiers are selected from the group consisting of N-alkyl polymethylene diamines of the formula
R-NH (CH.sub.2).sub.w NH.sub.2
where w is an integer of from 2 to 4 and R represents an aliphatic hydrocarbon containing from 8 to 22 carbon atoms. The preferred species, marketed under the trade name DUOMEEN T by Armak Chemical Division of Akzona Corporation, 110 North Wacker Drive, Chicago 6, Illinois is comprised of a tallow diamine having the formula R-NH (CH.sub.2).sub.3 NH.sub.2.
A second cationic emulsifier is used, which can be characterized as an emulsification aid and emulsion break suppressant. It is a compound selected from the group consisting of alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds of the formula ##EQU1## where n is from 1 to 2 and R represents an aliphatic hydrocarbon containing from 8 to 22 carbon atoms. An emulsification aid which has been found to have suitable properties is a tallow trimethylolammonium chloride sold under the trademark ARQUAD S-50 by the Armak Chemical Division of Akzona. The quaternary ammonium compounds, like the diamines are typically used in their salt forms.
Other compounds which may be useful to control the break stability of the emulsions are the N-alkyl polymethylene mono- and poly-alkoxylated diamines ##EQU2## where w is an integer of from 2 to 4, x, y, and z are integers of from 0 to 20 and the total of x, y, and z does not exceed 20.
When applying both a basic emulsifier and an emulsification aid-break suppressant as in parent application Ser. No. 457,969, it has been found that best results are obtained if the toal amount of emulsifier is between 0.3 percent and 1.2 percent by weight of the emulsion. the ratio of the basic emulsifier to the emulsification aid may be in the range of from 1:2 to 2:1.
The non-ionic surface active agent performs a relatively complex function which is not entirely understood. One of its functions particularly where the soil or sand is dry, is to wet the surface of the solid particles and activate the ions inherent therein. A second function is to modify and suppress the break point of the cationic emulsion by regulating the reactivity of the bituminous emulsion-siliceous solid reaction system which is obtained when the composition is sprayed on a ground surface. A number of different nonionic surface active agents can be used, however, the preferred species are those selected from the group consisting of alkyl aryl polyether alcohols, polyethoxylated nonylphenols (average ethylene oxide content of 4-12 mols per mol of nonyphenol) benzyl ethers of octyl phenyl and linear organic alcohols. Suitable commercial products are TRITON CF-10, a benzyl ether of octylphenolethylene oxide adduct, manufactured by Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, NOPCOWET 160, a nonionic, alkyl aryl polyether alcohol, manufactured by Nopco Chemical Division, Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company, Morristown, New Jersey and HYONIC PE-90 a polyethoxylated nonyphenol containing 9 mols of ethylene oxide per mol of nonylphenol, manufactured by Nopco Chemical Division of Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co., Morristown, New Jersey. As in the case with the cationic emulsifiers, the particular surface active agent chosen and the amount used may depend in part on the nature of the soil to be impermeabilized. However, it was found that good results were obtained if the total amount of the surface active agent was from approximately 0.1 to 1.5 percent by weight of the emulsion.
It was also found that improved results were obtained if the composition contained, in addition to the bituminous emulsion, the cationic emulsifiers and nonionic surface active agent, an emulsified elastomeric solid such as latex in an amount of from 1 to 10 percent by weight of the emulsion. The rubber solids may have a particle size of less than about 10 microns, and are kept in emulsion by the same active components as are useful for emulsifying the bitumen. Among the commercially available rubbers used to advantage are PLIOPAVE L 165-K and NEOPRENE 950. PLIOPAVE L 165-K is the trademark of the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. and identifies their cationic styrene - butadiene rubber latex comprising 60% rubber solids. NEOPRENE 950 is the trademark of the duPont Company and identifies their cationic chloroprene rubber latex comprising 50% solids.
The seal obtained where the compositions contain rubber solids is tougher and more flexible than where the rubber solids are not used. Inclusion of the rubber solids is recommended in areas where earth tremors or shifts in the strata are anticipated and the flexibility of the sealant mass is more important. It has been found that if less than one percent by weight of rubber solids are used, the advantages in the overall composition are not realized and where more than 10 percent rubber solids are used, no substantial additional advantages are achieved.
In addition to the aforedescribed components of the composition, an acid, preferably an inorganic acid such as hydrochloric acid or phosphoric acid is included. The amount of the acid used should correspond to that required to achieve a pH of the overall composition of from 3 to 7 or slightly less than 7 in order to establish an acidity which will insure the reactivity of the bitumen particles with the surface of the soil or sand particles which have a negatively charged characteristic. Typically the acid is used in from 0.1 to 1.0 percent of the emulsion. It has been found that best results are obtained if the pH is controlled in the range from 5 to 7.
Other modifying agents may be added to the composition to stabilize the emulsion for storgage or transport. As is known, for example, minor proportions of an alkali or alkaline earth metal salt such as calcium chloride or sodium chloride may be added to lengthen the life of the emulsion. Typically these components are added in from 0.01 percent to 1.0 percent by weight of the emulsion.
The bituminous materials that may be used to form the emulsions are well known in the art. They may be selected, broadly, from water-insoluble, water-dispersible, organic thermoplastic bituminous substances that are normally solid, semi-solid or viscous liquids at ordinary atmospheric temperatures. Examples of these materials are petroleum and native asphalts, pyrogenous residues, such as blown petroleum asphalts, sludge asphalts, pressure tars and pitches. Of these materials, petroleum asphalt is most commonly used and it may be produced to the desired physical properties of softening point (Ball & Ring) from 90.degree.F. to 200.degree.F. and penetration from 4 dmm to 205 dmm (at 77.degree.F.) by steam refining, by air-blowing, by solvent extraction methods, or by a combination of such methods.
Methods for forming stable emulsions of the bituminous substance in water are well known in the art. Typically, emulsions are prepared in concentrated form and contain about 65% solids. The emulsions are prepared by conventional methods as for example by first forming a solution of water, basic emulsifier, emulsification aid, acid and any other additives, together with rubber solids at about 120.degree.F. This solution and molten asphalt at about 280.degree.F. are then pumped simultaneously from separate vessles into a Charlotte Colloid Mill or other high shear pressurized mill wherein the asphalt is subjected to high shear forces and is broken up into small particles. The particle sizes in the finished emulsions may be broadly from 1 to 50 microns, but best results are obtained where 90 percent or more of the particles are less than 10 microns. Methods for forming the emulsions are extensively described in the art.
Although emulsions are typically prepared in more concentrated form, it has been found that good penetration of the surface material is obtained only where the solid content of the emulsion is in the range of 25 to 50 percent. The preferred solids concentration is 30 to 40 percent by weight.
The composition is applied to the walls and bed of water containment structures such as reservoirs, streams, ponds, irrigation ditches, canals and the like. The composition is preferably but not necessarily applied to the surface by spraying with a pole gun connected to a pump. The compositions may be applied to the surface soil in from 4 to 40 gallons per 100 square feet of surface. Desirably the spray is applied in from 10 to 20 gallons per 100 square feet of surface.
It has been found that particularly good results are obtained if the ground surface is first wet with water or preferably with a solution of nonionic surfactant in the range of 0.5 to 2.0 percent by weight of solution. Wetting the ground surface with water or surfactant solution compacts the soil particles closer to one another and prepares it advantageously for the asphalt emulsion. If a minor amount of the nonionic surface active agent is included in the water solution, the particles of sand or rock are more effectively wetted and this permits the subsequent emulsion to "wick" into the ground so that a deeper penetration is obtained. Penetrations of as much as 1 to 4 inches have been obtained with treatments following this technique. Depending on the nature of the soil to be waterproofed, it may be desirable to include a minor amount of acid in the pre-wetting step to further activate the negative surfaces of the siliceous ground material. Although not critical, it has been found that best results are obtained if the soil to be impermeabilized is first wet with approximately 50 to 100 gallons of water or solution per 100 square feet of surface. The solution used to prewet the permeable ground surface may contain from 1 to 10% by weight of an emulsion of the elastomeric material described above.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
It has now been found that superior water loss reduction and ground surface penetration is achieved by applying asphalt emulsions containing only one cationic emulsifier, in from 0.15 to 0.50% by weight of the emulsion, said emulsifier consisting essentially of a compound selected from the group consisting of alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds of the formula ##EQU3## where n is from 1 to 2 and R represents an aliphatic hydrocarbon containing from 8 to 22 carbon atoms, together with a nonionic surface active agent in from 1.5 to 2.9% by weight of the emulsion selected from the group consisting of
alkyl aryl polyether alcohols, polyethoxylated nonylphenols (average ethylene oxide content of 4--12 mols per mol of nonylphenol), benzyl ethers of octyl phenol and linear organic alcohols. The improved composition also contains elastomeric material in from 1.0 to 5.0 percent by weight of the emulsion and an acid to adjust the pH to from 3 to 7.
It has been found that using the improved composition containing a single cationic emulsifier of the type identified above together with substantially greater amounts of nonionic surface active agent, that the composition penetrates more deeply into the ground surface and that the asphaltic layer which is created is more impervious to water. Using the improved composition it has been found that penetration depths of 4 inches or more can be achieved.

In the following examples, Examples I-IV are representative of the methods and compositions disclosed in parent application Ser. No. 457,969. Examples V through XI are representative of the improved methods and compositions of the invention disclosed herein.
EXAMPLE I
The degree to which compositions disclosed in parent application Ser. No. 457,969 reduce the rate of water loss from sandy soils was determined in a series of tests using different compositions. The compositions were prepared by premixing the emulsifiers and other adjuvants in water in approximately 120.degree.F. and pumping the solution together with molten asphalt at 280.degree.F. to a colloid mill for emulsification. The components of the compositions are identified below.
______________________________________Asphalt-Binder B Shell Oil Co. 100-120 Penetration at 77.degree.F. Soft Point R&B, 108-118.degree.F. Ductility at 77.degree.F. at 5 cm/min.- 100 cm (minimum)Duomeen T - N alkyltrimethylene diamine Armak Chemical DivisionArquad S-50 N alkyl quaternary Armak Chemical ammonium compound DivisionPliopave L-165-K - Cationic Goodyear styrene-butadiene rubber latex - (60% solids)Neoprene 950 - Cationic Chloroprene duPont rubber latex - (50% solids)______________________________________
The compositions were applied to the surface of a sandy soil retained in one foot square plastic boxes. Each test box contained a four inch depth of test sand supported over a one inch layer of one inch stones which were separated from the sand by a mesh screen. A two inch square hole was cut in the bottom of the box to allow for runout and the boxes were suspended above the floor so that the holes in their bottoms would not be occluded. The time of water retention for the boxes treated with the composition was compared with the time of water retention in a control box of untreated sand. The time of water retention in the control box was approximately two to three minutes whereas the sand in the boxes treated with compositions ranged from 90 to 11,520 minutes. The results are expressed both in water retention times and in terms of percentage water loss reduction. The latter figures are the more meaningful ones since it is the parameter adopted by governmental agencies to determine the effectiveness of impermeabilizing treatments.
The results achieved with a variety of compositions are set forth below in Table I.
TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________COMPOUND Control A A-1__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 5200 5200Water 2800 2800Duomeen T 16 32Arquad S-50*HCL 8 8CaCl.sub.2 4 4Neoprene Latex 950 (50%)Pliolite Latex 160 (49%)Ucar Latex 893 (50%)Rhoplex Latex HA-12 (45%)Pliolite Latex 5352 (68%)Hycar Latex 1562 .times. 103 (41%)Pliopave Latex L165-K (63%)Emulsification Good GoodSmoothness Fairly Smooth SmoothParticles Slight None GritSettlement None NoneConcentration of Bituminous 65% 65%Solids (wgt%)Penetration 0.5" 1.0-2.0"Time of H.sub.2 O Retention (Min.) 23/4 600 2400for 1 Gal.Percolation Rate Gals/Min. .3636 .00166 .00042% Water Loss Reduction 99.45 99.89__________________________________________________________________________COMPOUND A-1' B C__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 5200 5200 5200Water 5500 2800 10800Duomeen T 32 16 8Arquad S-50 16 40*HCL 8 8 8CaCl.sub.2 4 4 4Neoprene Latex 950 (50%)Pliolite Latex 160 (49%)Ucar Latex 893 (50%)Rhoplex Latex HA-12 (45%)Pliolite Latex 5352 (68%)Hycar Latex 1562 .times. 103 (41%)Pliopave Latex L165-K (63)%Emulsification Good Good GoodSmoothness Smooth Very Very Smooth SmoothParticles None None NoneSettlement None None NoneConcentration of Bituminous 48.75% 65% 32.5%Solids (wgt%)Penetration 0.5-1.5" 0.5" 1"Time of H.sub.2 O Retention (Min.) 11520+ 90 132for 1 Gal.Percolation Rate Gals/Min. .000086 .01110 .00757% Water Loss Reduction 99.97 97.00 97.79__________________________________________________________________________COMPOUND B' H-1 H-1'__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 5200 5200 5200Water 10800 2400 10800Duomeen T 16 16 16Arquad S-50 16*HCL 8 8 8CaCl.sub.2 4 4 4Neoprene Latex 950 (50%) 800 800Pliolite Latex 160 (49%)Ucar Latex 893 (50%)Rhoplex Latex HA-12 (45%)Pliolite Latex 5352 (68%)Hycar Latex 1562 .times. 103 (41%)Pliopave Latex L165-K (63%)Emulsification Good Good GoodSmoothness Very Fairly Fairly Smooth Smooth SmoothParticles None Slight Slight Grit GritSettlement None None NoneConcentration of Bituminous 32.5% 65% 31%Solids (wgt %)Penetration 1" 0.5" 0.5"Time of H.sub.2 O Retention (Min.) .90 260 150for 1 Gal.Percolation Rate Gals/Min. .01110 .00384 .00666% Water Loss Reduction 97.00 98.95 98.07__________________________________________________________________________COMPOUND H-1a H-1b H-2__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 5200 5200 5200Water 2560 2560 2384Duomeen T 32 32 16Arquad S-50 16*HCL 8 8 8CaCl.sub.2 4 4 4Neoprene Latex 950 (50%) 480 480Pliolite Latex 160 (49%) 816Ucar Latex 893 (50%)Rhoplex Latex HA-12 (45%)Pliolite Latex 5352 (68%)Hycar Latex 1562 .times. 103 (41%)Pliopave Latex L165-K (63%)Emulsification Good Good N.G.Smoothness Smooth SmoothParticles None NoneSettlement None NoneConcentration of BituminousSolids (wgt %)PenetrationTime of H.sub.2 O Retention (Min.)for 1 Gal.Percolation Rate Gals/Min.% Water Loss Reduction__________________________________________________________________________COMPOUND H-3 H-4 H-4a__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 5200 5200 5200Water 2400 2312 2518Duomeen T 24 16 24Arquad S-50 16*HCL 8 8 8CaCl.sub.2 4 4 4Neoprene Latex 950 (50%)Pliolite Latex 160 (49%)Ucar Latex 893 (50%) 800Rhoplex Latex HA-12 (45%) 888 533Pliolite Latex 5352 (68%)Hycar Latex 1562 .times. 103 (41%)Pliopave Latex L165-K (63%)Emulsification Poor N.G. N.G.SmoothnessParticlesSettlementConcentration of BituminousSolids (wgt %)PenetrationTime of H.sub.2 O Retention (Min.)for 1 Gal.Percolation Rate Gals/Min.% Water Loss Reduction__________________________________________________________________________COMPOUND H-5 H-6 H-7__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 5200 5200 5200Water 2614 2224 2560Duomeen T 16 16 24Arquad S-50 16*HCL 8 8 8CaCl 4 4 4Neoprene Latex 950 (50%)Pliolite Latex 160 (49%)Ucar Latex 893 (50%)Rhoplex Latex HA-12 (45%)Pliolite Latex 5352 (68%) 584Hycar Latex 1562 .times. 103 (41%) 976Pliopave Latex L165-K (63%) 640Emulsification N.G. N.G. GoodSmoothnessParticles Some GritSettlementConcentration of Bituminous 62%Solids (wgt %)Penetration 1"Time of H.sub.2 O Retention (Min.) 1320for 1 Gal.Percolation Rate Gals/Min. .00075% Water Loss Reduction 99.72__________________________________________________________________________COMPOUND H-8 H-9 H-10__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 5200 5200 5200Water 2320 2560 2652Duomeen T 24 16 16Arquad S-50 16 16 16*HCL 8 8 8CaCl.sub.2 4 4 4Neoprene Latex 950 (50%) 480Pliolite Latex 160 (49%)Ucar Latex 893 (50%)Rhoplex Latex HA-12 (45%)Pliolite Latex 5352 (68%)Hycar Latex 1562 .times. 103 (41%)Pliopave Latex L165-K (63%) 1280 384Emulsification Poor Good GoodSmoothness Smooth SmoothParticles None NoneSettlement None NoneConcentration of Bituminous 63% 63%Solids (wgt %)Penetration 0.5-1.0" 0.5"Time of H.sub.2 O Retention (Min.) 600 1520for 1 Gal.Percolation Rate Gals/Min. .00166 .000086% Water Loss Reduction 99.45 99.97__________________________________________________________________________COMPOUND H-9' H-10'__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 5200 5200Water 5400 5500Duomeen T 16 16Arquad S-50 16 16*HCL 8 8CaCl.sub.2 4 4Neoprene Latex 950 (50%) 480Pliolite Latex 160 (49%)Ucar Latex 893 (50%)Rhoplex Latex HA-12 (45%)Pliolite Latex 5352 (68%)Hycar Latex 1562 .times. 103 (41%)Pliopave Latex L165-K (63%) 384Emulsification Good GoodSmoothness Smooth SmoothParticles None NoneSettlement None NoneConcentration of Bituminous 47% 47%Solids (wgt %)Penetration 0.5-0.75" 0.75-1.50"Time of H.sub.2 O Retention (Min.) 1320 2880for 1 Gal.Percolation Rate Gals/Min. .00075 .00034% Water Loss Reduction 99.72 99.89__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE II
A field application of the compositions and methods disclosed in parent application Ser. No. 457,969 was conducted in Pauma Valley, California. A composition was formed by combining three parts of a concentrated cationic emulsion with one part of a relatively dilute emulsion of latex solids in water. The concentrated asphalt emulsion had the following composition: Example:
______________________________________Component A % by weight______________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 64.58Water 34.80Duomeen T .29Arquad S-50 .19HCl .095CaCl.sub.2 .045 100.00______________________________________
The rubber emulsion had the following composition:
______________________________________Component B % by weight______________________________________Pliopave 165-K Latex (Solids) 6.56Water (including H.sub.2 O from Latex) 92.60Duomeen T .40Arquad S-50 .26HCl .11CaCl.sub.2 .07 100.00______________________________________
The mixed composition had the following total concentration of the several constituents:
______________________________________Mixed Composition % by weight______________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 195 48.57Pliopave 165-K (solids) 6.56 1.63Water 197.60 49.10Duomeen T 1.30 .32Arquad S-50 .86 .21HCl .41 .12CaCl.sub.2 .22 .05 401.95 100.00______________________________________
The mixed composition was applied to the dry base and side surfaces of an empty pond having a surface area of approximately 15,000 square feet. The composition was applied in approximately 8 gallons per 100 square feet of ground surface area. The soil particles were substantially impermeabilized although the penetration of the material was less than one and one half inch. After the materials had set, water was impounded in the pond during a 48 hour period and water loss tests were conducted. Inventory data was taken to determine the degree of water loss reduction. It was found that approximately 85 to 86 percent water loss reduction was achieved.
After the water loss reduction tests were terminated, the pond was drained. It was found that the surfaces of the bed and sides were covered with a continuous, non-tacky layer of asphaltic material, which was firm and resilient. The vertical sidewalls showed no signs of sliding or cracking and rocks and boulders were bound into the mass as well as the smaller particles. Examination of the pond surfaces showed that although the penetrations in some places were only one half inch, it was possible to walk upon the impermeabilized area without disturbing the surface or damaging it.
After a 3 month period the pond was drained and a second application of compositions (as described below) was made to the surface which had accumulated a coating of loose sand during the service period.
The first part of this second application consisted of spraying the following composition at a rate of 3.3 gallons per hundred square feet:
______________________________________ % by weight______________________________________Pliopave 165-K Latex (solids) 6.56Water (including water from latex) 91.60Duomeen T .40Arquad S-50 .26HCl .11CaCl.sub.2 .07Nopcowet 160 1.00 100.00______________________________________
The second part of this second application consisted of spraying the following composition at a rate of 2.4 gallons per hundred square feet:
______________________________________ % by weight______________________________________Asphalt (Binder) 48.57Pliopave 165-K (solids) 1.63Water (including water from latex) 47.60Duomeen T 0.32Arquad S-50 0.21HCl 0.12CaCl.sub.2 0.05Nopcowet 160 1.50 100.00______________________________________
After cure the pond was filled with water and the water loss was measured over a period of time and it was found that the composition had reduced the water loss by 98.8%.
EXAMPLE III
An application of a composition applied by a method disclosed in parent application Ser. No. 457,969 was conducted in a second natural location in Pauma Valley, California. A large pond identified in Example X approximately 30 feet by 40 feet by 6 feet deep at the center (approximately 13,000 gallons capacity), was used for the test. The surfaces of the bed and the sides of the pond site were treated first with a solution of latex binder having the following composition:
______________________________________ % by weight______________________________________Pliopave 165-K Latex (solids) 6.56Water (including H.sub.2 O from Latex) 91.60Duomeen T .40Arquad S-50 .26HCl .11CaCl.sub.2 .07Nopcowet 160 1.00 100.00______________________________________
The solution was applied at the rate of approximately one gallon per hundred square feet of surface. Thereafter the surfaces were treated with an emulsion sealer having the following composition:
______________________________________ % by weight______________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 48.57Pliopave 165-K (Solids) 1.63Water 47.60Duomeen T .32Arquad S-50 .21HCl .12CaCl.sub.2 .05Nopcowet 160 1.50 100.00______________________________________
The solution was applied at the rate of approximately 3.3 gallons per hundred square feet of surface. Penetration of the virgin soil by both the latex solution and the final emulsion sealer was excellent. The latex solution was applied in approximately one gallon per hundred square feet of surface and the emulsion sealer in approximately 3.3 gallons per hundred square feet of surface. The sealing of approximately 2,300 square feet of surface area was completed in 90 minutes.
After cure, this pond was filled with water and the water loss was measured over a period of time and it was found that the treatment had reduced the water loss by 96.6%.
EXAMPLE IV
Tests were carried out to determine the efficacy of including minor amounts of various non-ionic surfactants in the compositions of parent application Ser. No. 457,969 to improve soil penetration and decrease soak-in time.
An emulsion having the mixed composition described in Example II and having in addition, 0.5 percent of surfactant, was used in concentrated form (52% asphalt solids) and in dilute form (26% asphalt solids), 50 ml. of each emulsion was applied to a 4 sq. in. .times. 1/2 in. deep area (confined in an aluminum form) set on the surface of the sand in an 8 .times. 8 .times. a 11/2inch deep disposable aluminum baking pan. Soak-in time and penetration data were recorded as set forth in the following Table II. It can be seen that best results are obtained with Nopcowet 160, an alkyl aryl polyether alcohol, Hyonic PE-90, a polyethoxylated nonylphenol, Triton CF-10, a benzylether of octylphenol-ethylene oxide adduct of Tergitol TMN or 15- S-7, a linear alcohol.
TABLE II______________________________________ % SolidsEmulsion (by weight) Surfactant______________________________________Control 52 NoneControl' 26 None1 52 Hyonic PE90 (polyethoxylated Nonylphenol)1' 26 "2 52 Lomar D (polymerized Naphthalene Sulfonate)2' 26 "3 52 Lomar PW Sodium Neutralized (Naphthalene Sulfonic Acid)3' 26 "4 52 Nopcowet 160 (alkyl aryl polyether alcohol)4' 26 "5 52 Nopcowet 15295' 26 "6 52 Tergitol TMN (Trimethyl Nonanol)6' 26 "7 52 Tergitol 15-S-7 (Linear Alcohol)7' 26 Tergitol 15-S-7 (Linear Alcohol)8 52 Silicone Y-4186 (Silicone)8' 26 "9 52 Triton CF-10 (Benzylether of octylphenol- ethylene oxide)9' 26 "10 52 Triton X-100 (Octyl phenoxy ethanol)10' 26 "11 52 Triton X-114 (Octyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol)11' 26 "12 52 Triton X-400 (Stearyl dimethylbenzyl - ammonium chloride + stearyl and isopropyl alcohols)12' 26 "______________________________________ Soak-In Time Depth ofEmulsion (If Rapid) Penetration______________________________________Control -- NoneControl' 60 min. 1/4"1 180 min. 1/4"1' 360 min. 1/2"2 -- None2' -- None3 -- None3' -- None4 180 min. 1/4"4' 8 min. 1"5 -- None5' 60 min. 1/4"-1"6 -- None6' 5 min. 1/2"-11/2"7 -- None7' 360 min. 1/2"-11/2"8 -- None8' 360 min. 1/4"-1"9 -- None9' >360 min. 1/4"10 -- None10' >360 min. 1/8"-1/4"11 -- None11' 32 min. 1/8"-1/4"12 -- None12' >360 min. 1/8"-1/4"______________________________________
EXAMPLE V
A series of compositions were prepared in a laboratory Waring Blender in 300 gram size batches containing 65% solids. After allowing the emulsions to stand for 24 hours to make sure of their stability, the concentrates were diluted and poured on sandy soil in 2.5 inch diameter by 2.5 inch deep clear plastic tubes. The plastic tubes were resting on screening and filter paper to facilitate seepage. The results of these penetration tests are reported in Table III below.
TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________ Composition Composition Composition B-1 D-2 G-3 Composition Composition Composition CompositionIngredients 12-5-G 12-6-L 12-6-M H-4 K-5 M-6 I-7__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt 65 65 65 65 65 65 65Water 35 35 35 35 35 35 35Redicote E-42 0.18 0.18 0.18 -- -- -- --Arquad S-50 -- -- -- 0.33 -- 0.33 --Redicote E-50 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Hyonic PE-90 0.9 1.80 1.80 1.80 -- 1.80 --Urea -- 1.80 1.80 -- 0.90 0.90Aluminum Chloride -- -- -- 0.90 -- -- --Neoprene 950 -- -- 1.80 1.80 1.80 -- 1.80HCl pH 5.5 pH 5.5 pH 5.5 pH 5.5 -- pH 5.5 --Calcium chloride 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 --Hyonic PE-250 -- -- -- -- 1.80 -- 2.70Hyonic PE-60 -- -- -- -- 0.90 -- --Asphalt 35%as Tested 30% 27% 35% 35% -- 35% 35% -Penetration onCal. Sand 11/4" 11/2" Full Full -- Full Erratic(21/2" dia. .times.21/2" high tubes)Asphalt Content 35% + 35% + 45% +as Tested 1.8% Neop. 1.8% Neop. 45% 45% -- 1.8 Neop. --Penetration onCal. Sand 1/2" 1/2" Full Full -- Full Fast --(21/2" dia. .times.21/2" high tubes)Asphalt Content 45% + 55% +as Tested 45% 1.8% Neop. 55% 55% -- 1.8% Neop. --Penetration onCal. Sand 1/4" 1/2" 11/2-2" Full -- Full Fast --(21/2" dia. .times.21/2" high tubes)__________________________________________________________________________
The comparative penetration tests reported in Table III indicate that best results are obtained with compositions containing nonionic surface active agent (Hyonic PE-90) in 1.80% by weight of the emulsion. Best results are also obtained where the asphalt content of the emulsion is less than 45% and preferably 27% to 35%. Best results were obtained with the composition identified M-6.
EXAMPLE VI
Comparative tests were carried out among several compositions to determine which compositions achieved the deepest and most controllable penetration results and best condition of the deposited asphalt film. Table IV below reports the comparative results which were achieved.
TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________ 11-17-F 11-22-P 12-6-N 12-6-L 12-6-M 12-6-O 12-1-D 12-5-G 12-5-J 12-7-A__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt 63.40 63.40 62.00 62.70 61.60 61.60 63.60 64.40 63.20 62.00Water 34.20 34.20 33.60 33.80 33.30 33.30 34.40 34.60 34.10 33.40HyonicPE-60 0.70 0.35 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HyonicPE-90 -- 1.70 1.50 1.65 1.65 2.55 1.67 0.83 1.53 1.15HyonicPE-250 1.70 0.35 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Urea -- -- -- 1.65 1.65 -- -- -- -- 1.65AluminumChloride -- -- .90 -- -- -- -- -- 0.85 --ArquadS-50 -- -- .30 -- -- -- -- -- 0.32 --RedicoteE-42 -- -- -- -- 0.15 0.17 -- 0.17 -- 0.15Neoprene950 -- -- 1.70 -- 1.65 1.68 -- -- -- 1.65RedicoteE-50 -- -- -- 0.20 -- -- 0.33 -- -- --Type VeryFilm Tacky Tacky Dry Dry Dry Tacky Tacky Tacky Dry Dry.sup.1) Soaked Film Broke Broke Pinholes PinholesCondition Apart Apart Exc. Broke Pinholes Pinholes Pinholes Broke Broke Pinholes.sup.2) WaterCondition Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear.sup.3) SandPenetration Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Slight__________________________________________________________________________ 12-7-B 12-7-C 12-7-D 11-17B__________________________________________________________________________Asphalt 62.00 62.10 62.10 63.30Water 33.40 33.40 33.40 34.20HyonicPE-60 -- -- -- --HyonicPE-90 1.15 0.84 -- --HyonicPE-250 -- -- -- 2.50Urea 1.65 1.66 1.66 --AluminumChloride -- -- -- --ArquadS-50 -- -- -- --RedicoteE-42 -- -- 0.34 --Neoprene950 1.65 1.66 1.66 --RedicoteE-50 0.15 0.34 -- --Type Film Dry Medium Dry Tacky.sup.1) Soaked FilmCondition Pinholes Pinholes Pinholes Broke.sup.2) WaterCondition Clear Clear Clear Clear.sup.3) SandPenetration Slight Slight Slight Full__________________________________________________________________________ Notes- .sup.1) Films were deposited on thin aluminum sheets. .sup.2) Clear water condition indicates that there was no re-emulsification. .sup.3) New Jersey Sand compounded to simulate California Sand in size distribution.
The data reported in Table IV shows that full penetration is only achieved where the content of nonionic surfactant is in excess of 1.5% by weight of the emulsion.
EXAMPLE VII
Larger batches of compositions of this invention were prepared at a pilot plant with a Chemi-Colloid Mill. Five gallon batches of stable emulsions having the formulations shown in Table V herebelow were prepared. The data in Table IV below indicate the concentration levels (percent by weight asphalt in aqueous asphalt emulsion) at which full penetration of a 2.5 inch deep test tube was achieved, using the compositions reported in Table V, diluted as indicated. It is apparent from the data that the most satisfactory formulation is M-6 MOD.
TABLE V______________________________________Formula Weights (Parts) M-6 M-6 MOD G-3 J______________________________________Asphalt (Binder B) 65 65 65 65Water 35 35 35 35Arquad S-50 0.33 0.33 -- --Redicote E-42 -- -- 0.18 --Hyonic PE-90 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.30Hyonic PE-250 -- -- -- 1.30Neoprene 950 -- 1.80 1.80 1.80HCl Adjust Adjust Adjust -- pH to 5.5 pH to 5.5 pH to 5.5CaCl.sub.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 --Type Cationic- Cationic- Cationic- Non-ionic Non-ionic Non-ionic Non-ionic______________________________________
TABLE VI______________________________________Compound Batch Concentration______________________________________M-6 A 35%M-6 A 45%M-6 B 35%M-6 B 45%M-6 + Neoprene A 35%M-6 + Neoprene B 45%M-6 A+B 35%M-6 A+B 45%M-6 + Neoprene A+B 45%M-6 + Neoprene A+B 55%M-6 MOD C-1 35%M-6 MOD C-2 45%M-6 MOD D 35%M-6 MOD D 45%M-6 MOD D 55%G-3 E+F 35%______________________________________
EXAMPLE VIII
The M-6 MOD composition reported in Example VII was tested further as to the percent water loss reduction achieved by it when applied upon sand. Plastic boxes having a dimension of 12 inches by 12 inches by 4 inches deep were filled with sand and sprayed with an M-6 MOD emulsion containing 45% solids. The sprayed emulsions were allowed to dry for 72 hours and then water retention tests were conducted. These tests showed 99% water loss reduction. Table VII shows the results obtained with other emulsions applied in varying amounts.
TABLE VII______________________________________AREA1) 35% M-6 MOD 2400 CC on 3 Sq. Ft. =20 Gal/100 Sq. Ft. of Diluted Emuls. PENETRATION = 11/2"AREA2) 45% M-6 MOD 2400 CC on 3 Sq. Ft. =20 Gal/100 Sq. Ft. of Diluted Emulsion PENETRATION = 2"AREA3) 45% M-6 MOD 2400 CC on 11/2 Sq. Ft. =40 Gal/100 Sq. Ft. of Diluted Emulsion PENETRATION = 3"AREA4) 45% M-6 MOD + 4% Extra Neoprene Latex 4800 CC on 3 Sq. Ft. =40 Gal/100 Sq. Ft. of Diluted Emulsion PENETRATION = 2"______________________________________
EXAMPLE IX
Transparent glass tubes 6.75 I.D. .times. 12 in. high were used as the confining vessels for the sand to be treated so that penetration of asphalt emulsion (M-6 MOD) and subsequent water permeability after treatment could be observed.
Using Sakrete All-Purpose (Washed Silica) Sand as a standard, a weighed quantity to make 5 inch depth was placed in each of the eight glass test tubes. Simultaneously, a proportionate amount of sand was placed in small transparent (2.5 dia. .times. 6 inch high) plastic tubes.
The two test series run in the large and small tubes were for the purpose of determining the necessary dilution of 10, 20, 30 and 40 gallons of emulsion concentrate (60%) applied per 100 sq. ft. of soil surface, to obtain four inches of penetration and to determine the penetration obtained with 10, 20, 30 and 40 gallons respectively of asphalt emulsion concentrate per 100 sq. ft. of soil surface, using a predetermined dilution. The trial runs with the small tubes acted as guides for determining the range of dilutions etc. to investigate with the larger ones.
Tables VIII, IX and X indicate the dilutions, application rates, quantities per sq. ft., penetration depths and times of penetration for the small and large tubes.
TABLE VIII__________________________________________________________________________(SMALL TUBES)(Surface Area - 4.58 sq. in.) - 565 gms. sand per tube M-6 MODConc. Volume Quantity per Penetration Penetration Penetration Penetration(Dilution) per Sq. .25 sq. ft. Depth (Dry Sand) Time (Dry Sand) Depth (Wet Sand) Time (Wet__________________________________________________________________________ Sand)45% 10 gal. 17.5 ml. 3/4" 24 sec. 1-11/2" 26 sec.45% 20 gal. 35.0 ml. 11/4" 83 sec. 33/4-4" 60 sec.45% 30 gal. 42.5 ml. 13/4- 2" 165 sec. 4" 150 sec.45% 40 gal. 70.0 ml. 21/2 - 3" 300 sec. 41/2" 90 sec.35% 10 gal. 22.5 ml. 3/4- 11/4" 19 sec. 21/4" 32 sec.35% 20 gal. 45.0 ml. 2" 33 sec. 31/2 -4" 90 sec.35% 30 gal. 67.5 ml. 2-21/2" 74 sec. 4" 165 sec.35% 40 gal. 90.0 ml. 21/2" - 3" 174 sec. 41/2"+ 308__________________________________________________________________________ sec.
TABLE IX__________________________________________________________________________(LARGE TUBES) (Surface Area - 35.8 sq. in.) 4404 gms. sand per tube 2205 gms. WATER PRE-WET Penetration Penetration Penetration PenetrationConc. Volume Quantity per Depth Time Depth Time Water Seepage Water Loss(Dilution) per sq. .25 sq. ft. (Dry Sand) (Dry Sand) (Wet Sand) (Wet Sand) Time Reduction__________________________________________________________________________25% 10 gal. 246 ml. 4" 49 sec. 1320 sec. 80%30% 20 gal. 416 ml. 4" 105 sec. 1800 sec. 85%35% 30 gal. 525 ml. 4" 180 sec. 1860 sec. 86%45% 40 gal. 544 ml. 4" 331 sec. 2760 sec. 90%25% 40 gal. 984 ml. 4" 169 sec. 1320 sec. 80%20% 30 gal. 921 ml. 4" 135 sec. 900 sec. 70%20% 20 gal. 614 ml. 2-21/2" 110 sec. 1560 sec. 83%30% 10 gal. 208 ml. 1" 23 sec. 1020 sec. 73.5%__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE X__________________________________________________________________________(LARGE TUBES) (Surface Area - 35.8 sq. in.) 4404 gms. sand per tube 2205 gms. H.sub.2 O or Emulsifier per tube M-6 MOD M-6 MOD M-6 MOD M-6 MODConc. Pre-Wet Volume Quantity PRE-WET Penetration Penetration Water Seepage Water Loss(Dilution) Solution per Square per .25 sq. ft. TIME TIME Depth Time Reduction__________________________________________________________________________45% WATER 10 gal. 136 ml. 264 sec. 39 sec. 11/4" Black 3600 sec. 92.5% 4" Brown45% WATER 20 gal. 272 ml. 342 sec. 195 sec. 3" Black 2700 sec. 90.0% 5" Brown45% WATER 30 gal. 408 ml. 261 sec. 268 sec. 5" Black 1440 sec. 81.3%45% WATER 40 gal. 544 ml. 352 sec. 120 sec. 1/2" Skin 3" Black 41/2" Brown45% .sup.1) 1% 136-11 10 gal. 136 ml. 338 sec. 50 sec. 11/2" Black 2400 sec. 88.8% .sup.2) 1% 136-DT45% .sup.1) 1% 136-11 20 gal. 272 ml. 365 sec. 205 sec. 3-4" Black 4200 sec. 93.6% .sup.2) 1% 136-DT45% .sup.1) 1% 136-11 30 gal. 408 ml. 334 sec. 365 sec. 4" Black 6420 sec. 95.8% .sup.2) 1% 136-DT45% .sup.1) 1% 136-11 40 gal. 544 ml. 329 sec. 780 sec. 41/2" Black 3780 sec. 93.0% .sup.2) 1% 136-DT__________________________________________________________________________ NOTE: .sup.1) 136-11 is Redkote E-11 from Armak Chemical Division of Akzona Corporation. .sup.2) 136-DT is Duomeen T from Armak Chemical Division of Akzona Corporation.
EXAMPLE X
A field application of the composition and method was conducted in Pauma Valley, California. A reservoir (240 .times. 116 .times. 27 ft. deep) was formed by clearing a natural valley between two mountains, damming up the lower end, and sheepsfoot - compacting the surface. It was spray-treated in two applications at a total application rate of 9 gallons of emulsion concentrate (62.5% solids) per 100 square feet of surface area. The composition applied had the following make-up.
______________________________________ *M-6 MOD______________________________________18 gals. M-6 MOD* Asphalt 65.018 gals. Water Water 35.0 5 gals. Methyl Alcohol/Water Arquad S-50 0.33 50/50 by volume Hyonic PE-90 1.80 Neoprene 950 1.80 HCl pH to 5.5 CaCl.sub.2 0.10 104.03______________________________________
A drying time of 7 days was allowed for the treatment before the reservoir was filled with water. Close observation and measurements of water level over a six month period indicated that a water loss reduction of better than 95% was obtained.
EXAMPLE XI
The composition described in Example X above was applied in two applications at the rate of 10 gal./100 sq. ft. (with 1 hour between applications) to the surface of a sandy soil retained in a one foot square plastic box. The four inch deep sand was supported over a one inch layer of one inch stones which were separated from the sand by a 12 mesh screen. A two inch square hole had been cut in the bottom of the box to allow for water runout, and the box was suspended above the floor so that the bottom hole would not be occluded.
The treatment was allowed to dry and cure for 7 days and then tested for water impingement resistance in order to simulate the water action encountered in an irrigation canal.
An 1/8 inch stream of water was allowed to impinge on the treated surface from a height of 12 inches at the rate of 1 gal./min. At the end of a 3 month test period the treated surface showed that there had been no abrasion, movement, boring, cracking or other harmful effects.
EXAMPLE XII
In order to evaluate the effect of lower solids content in the applied emulsion, on water retention of a storage reservoir, a fourth, large-scale field trial was undertaken. An excavation of a sandy, dried, former river bed in Pala, California was made. The dimensions were: diameter -- 108 feet, depth -- 20 feet. The sides of this excavation were raked; however, no other preparation of the surface was attempted.
The surface was then spray-treated according to the method, with the compositions disclosed, but with asphaltic solids content ranging from 15 percent to 35 percent, by weight. The composition selected for the bottom and sides of the reservoir had the followijg formula:
______________________________________18.5 gallons of M-6 Mod*56.5 gallons of water 5.0 gallons of Methyl Alcohol/Water (50/50 by volume)______________________________________
______________________________________*M-6 Mod - By Weight______________________________________Asphalt 65.0Water 35.0Arquad S-50 0.33Hyonic PE-90 1.8Neoprene Latex 1.8HCL (to pH 5.5) --Ca Cl.sub.2 0.10 104.03______________________________________
The applied composition was readily absorbed by the surface, penetrating to a depth greater than 1 inch, and in spots, greater than 3 inches. The treatment decreased water loss through the surface by more than 90 percent.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
3831382	Califano et al.	Aug 1974
3891586	Califano et al.	Jun 1975

Product and method for reducing water loss through soil by seepage

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

US Referenced Citations (2)

Divisions (1)

Continuation in Parts (1)