The present disclosure relates generally to dispensers, and more specifically to dispensers that discourage the use of unauthorized product.
Dispenser apparatus for dispensing flexible sheet product, such as paper towel and the like, are well known in the art. Such dispensers typically discharge sheet product provided in the form of a sheet product roll. The sheet product roll comprises a sheet product web wound about a core. The core is typically in the form of a cylindrically-shaped hollow core made of paper, plastic or a like material. The core typically has an inner surface and open ends provided to mount the sheet product roll within the dispenser. The sheet product roll may be mounted within the dispenser, for example, by means of a yoke with roll holders or mandrels adapted for insertion into the open ends of the core.
Dispensers presently commercially generally available lack any capability to identify whether a product is authorized for use with such dispensers. The use of unauthorized sheet product in a proprietary dispenser can contribute to unreliable operation of the dispenser. The practice of supplying unauthorized paper to a proprietary dispenser is sometimes referred to in the art as “stuffing”. One proposed method of addressing this problem of unauthorized sheet product use in a dispenser has been to provide a dispenser permitting recognition of sheet product for use with a given dispenser and “locking-out” (e.g., disabling) the dispenser when unauthorized sheet product is employed. One problem of “lock-out” schemes is that they disable the dispenser, thereby giving the appearance of unreliability of the dispenser to the end user.
Accordingly, a continual need exists for dispensers that discourage the use of unauthorized product.
Disclosed herein are products, dispensers and methods of dispensing products.
In one embodiment, a method of dispensing product, the method comprises determining by a processor if product loaded into a dispenser is authorized for use in the dispenser by identifying a reference indication associated with the product; in response to determination that the product is authorized, dispense a first amount of product; and in response to determination that the sheet product is unauthorized, dispense a second amount of sheet product, wherein the second amount of sheet product is different than the first amount.
In one embodiment, a method of dispensing product, the method comprises determining by a processor if product loaded into a dispenser is authorized for use in the dispenser by identifying a reference indication associated with the product; in response to determination that the product is authorized, dispense the product at a first speed; and in response to determination that the sheet product is unauthorized dispense a the product at a second speed, wherein the second speed is different than the first speed.
In one embodiment, a sheet product comprises a core; and a sheet product web wound about the core, wherein the core comprises an overt indication that is visible to the human eye and/or a covert indication that is not visible to the human eye.
In one embodiment, a sheet product dispenser for dispensing sheet product from a roll, the sheet product dispenser comprises a processor responsive to executable instructions; a support for rotatably supporting the roll; a sensor in signal communication with the processor and responsive to rotation of the roll to detect a reference indication on a core of the roll, wherein the reference indication being associated with authorized use of the sheet product in the dispenser; and a feed mechanism comprising a drive motor responsive to the processor for advancing the sheet product out of the sheet product dispenser; wherein the processor, upon execution of the instructions, implements a method, the method comprising: determining if the roll loaded into the sheet dispenser comprises the reference indication; in response to determination that the sheet product has the reference indication dispense a first length of sheet product; and in response to determination that the sheet product is absent the reference indication dispense a second length of sheet product, wherein the second length of sheet product is greater than the first length.
In one embodiment, a sheet product dispenser for dispensing sheet product from a roll, the sheet product dispenser comprises a processor responsive to executable instructions; a support for rotatably supporting the roll; a sensor in signal communication with the processor and responsive to rotation of the roll to detect a reference indication on a core of the roll, wherein the reference indication being associated with authorized use of the sheet product in the dispenser; and a feed mechanism comprising a drive motor responsive to the processor for advancing the sheet product out of the sheet product dispenser; wherein the processor, upon execution of the instructions, implements a method, the method comprising: determining if the roll loaded into the sheet dispenser comprises the reference indication; in response to determination that the sheet product has the reference indication dispense sheet product at a first speed; and in response to determination that the sheet product is absent the reference indication dispense sheet product at a second speed, wherein the second speed is different than the first speed.
These and other advantages and features will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention that is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the exemplary drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the accompanying Figures:
Disclosed herein are dispensers that that discourage the use of unauthorized products (articles). For ease in discussion, reference is made to the product being a sheet product, with the understanding that a person of skill in the art can readily adapt these teachings to other articles, such as flowable products (e.g., liquids, foams, gases, or gels), cutlery, cups, and the like without undue experimentation.
As used herein, the terms “sheet product” and “sheet products” are inclusive of natural and/or synthetic cloth or paper sheets. Further, sheet products can include both woven and non-woven articles. Examples of sheet products include, but are not limited to wipers, napkins, tissues, and towels.
Referring to
Middle chassis member 18 provides a foundation for a feed mechanism 36, driven by an electric motor 38, serving to dispense web 28 from roll 26 in incremental sheet segments. In one embodiment as depicted, the feed mechanism includes a mating feed (drive) roller 40 and pressure roller 42 which cooperate to dispense the web material 28. Feed roller 40 and pressure roller 42 are mounted upon axles rotatably supported at their ends by side chassis members 14, 16. Pressure roller 42 may be biased against feed roller 40 by a spring (not shown) to define a feed nip 44. When web 28 is fed into nip 44, rotation of feed roller 40 causes web 28 to be advanced through nip 44, around feed roller 40.
In the illustrated embodiment, roll 26 includes a continuous web 28 of flat segments of sheet product that may be wound upon a hollow cylindrical core. Dispenser 10 could, of course, dispense other flexible webs 28. The web 28 could, for example, be in the form of folded sheet segments wound onto a roll and separable from each other along lines of perforation to form folded napkins. In one embodiment, the roll 26 includes reference indications 52 (
The reference indications 52 may be visible or invisible to the human eye, but are detectable via a sensor. The sensor employed will vary depending on the choice of reference indications 52. For example, suitable reference indications include, but are not limited, to bar codes; RFID “radio frequency identification” tags; inks or dyes; conductive particles, fibers, or metals; tick marks; ridges.
In on embodiment, the reference indications may include one or more marks that fluoresce when in the presence of light provided from a light source. The lights source, detector, and reference indications can all correspond with each other such that these components operate with light of a predetermined wavelength. However, while fluorescence marks may be suitable for many occasions, a sophisticated counterfeiter or stuffer may find these fluorescence marks provide a low hurdle to overcome. It has been discovered that the use of phosphoresce inks can provide a higher hurdle for counterfeiting and may be preferred for some embodiments.
In one embodiment, the roll comprises an overt indication that is visible to the human eye that can act as a decoy to potential counterfeiters and a covert indication that is not visible by the human eye. A supplier of the product may vary the overt indication for different production runs to keep the potential counterfeiter guessing as to the purpose of the indication, while the covert indication is the indication actually used to determine whether or not a product is authorized or unauthorized.
Referring now to
As shown, the method 300 comprises a product check 310. In one embodiment, the product is a sheet product (e.g., continuous web 28), which has been encoded with certain product identification information. The dispenser 10 is configured to obtain product identification information by one or more sensing/detection methods. For example, in some embodiments a light source and a photo detector may be used to obtain product identification information. The light source and the photo detector can be placed within the dispenser in such a location as to obtain product identification information placed at one or more predetermined locations on the product. In such a configuration, the light source can direct light at a predetermined wavelength toward the product. The product can be configured to include a dye mark that will reflect back light provided by the light source. The photo detector can be configured to receive light reflected back by the dye mark.
The method 300 can also include continuous checking of product during dispensing operations. Such testing can be performed at predetermined intervals by microprocessor 46. In addition, such testing may be performed in response to end user activity receiving product from the dispenser. This enables a process to continuously monitor product for dispensing and end user interaction with a dispenser.
If it is determined at product check 310 that authorized product is being employed in the dispenser 10, the dispenser 10 will dispense product per an authorized product schedule at 320. For example, the authorized product schedule can be the amount of product the dispenser is normally set to dispense. If, however, it is determined that unauthorized product is being employed in the dispenser 10, the dispenser 10 will dispense product per an un-authorized product schedule 330. For example, the un-authorized product schedule can dispense product in a manner to discourage stuffing the dispenser with counterfeit product.
One driver for a customer to purchase counterfeit product is price, i.e., a counterfeit product (unauthorized product) is likely to cost less money than an original product (authorized product). In one embodiment, the dispenser discourages stuffing by destroying the cost-in-use proposition for a competitor attempting to “stuff” a propriety dispenser with unauthorized sheet products. In other words, a facility operator employing unauthorized product actually ends up spending more money than he would have spent using the authorized product, because an excessive amount of sheet product is dispensed when an unauthorized sheet product is employed.
In one embodiment, the dispenser 10 “over delivers” product, if an un-authorized product is employed in the dispenser. As used herein, the term “over delivery” refers to a pre-determined amount of extra product dispensed compared to a normal dispense cycle if authorized product had been employed. For example, if the dispenser where programmed to dispenser “X” amount of authorized product, the dispenser can dispenser X plus a set amount extra, two times X, three times X, or a greater amount, if un-authorized product is employed. The amount can be selected such that the un-authorized product will cost the facility operator more money to dispense un-authorized product than authorized product. The over delivery amount may or may not be noticeable to the end user. However, it may be advantageous to dispense an amount of product that is noticeable to the end user to facilitate communication to the establishment that the dispenser is operating in an unusual manner to aid in detecting that un-authorized product is being employed. For example, in a sheet product dispenser it is common to dispenser sheet product in amounts less than or equal to about 12 to 14 inches. The sheet length for “over delivery” can be 2 feet to 25 feet in length, specifically a length of 3 feet to 6 feet. In other embodiments, the dispenser can continue dispensing until an entire sheet product roll is depleted. The pile of sheet product on the floor can trigger a complaint to the facility operator. The facility operator can self diagnosis the problem by a warning label disposed on the dispenser 10 indicating that the dispenser may dispenser dispense more product if unauthorized product is employed. If the facility operator is unable to diagnosis the problem, the supplier may contact the owner or manufacturer of the dispenser, wherein the owner or manufacturer of the dispenser will immediately understand the problem to be un-authorized use of product. In other words, inquiries about over delivery of product can be used as a tool for policing and enforcing leases of proprietary systems.
In other embodiments, the dispenser can “under deliver” product to discourage dispensing of unauthorized product. The term “under delivery” refers to a pre-determined lesser amount of product to dispense compared to a normal dispense cycle if authorized product had been employed. For example, if the dispenser where programmed to dispenser “X” amount of authorized product, the dispenser can dispense half of X, a quarter of X, or a lesser amount if un-authorized product is employed. While under deliver may not destroy the cost-in-use proposition compared to over delivery, it does provide another means of detecting whether or not un-authorized product is being employed.
In other embodiments, the dispenser can dispenser product a “slower” speed compared to the speed at which product is dispensed during normal operation. For example, if the dispenser where programmed to dispenser “X” amount of authorized product per second, the dispenser can dispense half of X per second, a quarter of X per second, or a lesser amount per second, if un-authorized product is employed. Again, while a slower deliver speed may not destroy the cost-in-use proposition compared to over delivery, it does provide another means of detecting whether or not authorized product is being employed.
Without wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that by not employing a lock-out scheme; goodwill with the end-user associated with the branded dispenser is maintained. In other words, in schemes where a dispenser is locked-out or disabled when an unauthorized sheet product is loaded into the dispenser, the end-user (i.e., the person using the dispenser) may form a negative impression of the branded dispenser. Whereas, by employing a design where the dispenser still dispenses product even when un-authorized product is employed, the goodwill associated with the brand is maintained, since the dispenser reliably dispensed paper. The un-authorized dispensing schedules discussed above discourage stuffing of the dispenser with unauthorized products, while trying to minimize any negative impressions that can tarnish the goodwill associated with a dispenser.
In other embodiments, to further limit negative impressions, the dispenser may provide feedback to the end user, the facility operator, the owner of the dispenser, and the like that unauthorized product has been employed. For example, in response to the loading of sheet product absent the reference indications 52, the dispenser 10 provides feedback to an external party, such as to a servicing attendant or sheet product user for example, that such unauthorized product has been loaded. As used herein, the term “feedback” shall be defined as an action taken by the dispenser 10 to indicate to the external party that such unauthorized product has been loaded into the dispenser. It will be appreciated that “feedback” is distinguished from inactivity (e.g., “locking out” or deactivation) of the dispenser 10. Indeed, the dispenser 10 is programmed to dispense sheet product, even if an unauthorized product is loaded into the dispenser 10; the dispenser 10 does not employ a “lock-out” scheme, if unidentified sheet products are employed in the dispenser.
In one embodiment, the microprocessor 46 may be responsive to loading of such material absent the reference indication 52 to indicate use of unauthorized product by flashing a light-emitting-diode (LED) 154 (
An embodiment of the invention may be embodied in the form of processor-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes. Embodiments of the present invention may also be embodied in the form of a processor program product having program code containing instructions embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, USB (universal serial bus) drives, processor memory, or any other processor readable storage medium, wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a processor, the processor is responsive to the executable instructions and becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. Embodiments of the invention also may be embodied in the form of instructions, or program code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a processor, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein when the instructions or program code are loaded into and executed by a processor, the processor becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose microprocessor, the instructions or program code segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits. A technical effect of the executable instructions is to dispense and measure a length of sheet product from a sheet dispenser.
As disclosed, some embodiments of the invention may include some of the following advantages: an ability to identify sheet product loaded within a dispenser; and an ability to provide feedback to an external party that unidentified sheet product has been loaded within a dispenser. A particularly useful advantage is the ability of the dispenser to dispense product per an unauthorized product schedule, when an unauthorized sheet product is employed in the dispenser. Customers are often tempted to use an inferior quality sheet product dispenser in a propriety dispensing system to save money. This practice, however, can destroy the reputation of the manufacturer of the proprietary dispensing system, since the product is of often of inferior quality to the product used in the proprietary system. Further, attempts to discourage this practice by locking-out (e.g. disabling) the dispenser can also tarnish the reputation and goodwill associated with the brand of the proprietary system. By dispensing product per an unauthorized product schedule, “stuffing” of the dispenser is discouraged.
While the disclosure has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the disclosure without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this disclosure, but that the disclosure will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/015,691 filed Dec. 21, 2007, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61015691 | Dec 2007 | US |