Retailers typically use on-shelf displays to present their products. As the retail landscape changes and business strategies evolve, an “open-sell” approach for creating a more accessible shopping environment has become increasingly desirable. On-shelf displays that can best fulfill the specific needs of the open-sell environment are important to such retailers.
The traditional custom build and manufacturing methods used for open-sell retailers are expensive and not sustainable. For example, metal husks that traditionally house open-sell systems are highly customized—requiring complex, expensive detailing, are heavy, difficult to install and sit in landfills at their end-of-life. The typical processes of gluing and taping unlike materials together as part of the test/merchandising systems mean that updates cannot be disassembled for recycling.
The present disclosure generally relates to a product display chassis (apparatus) that allows open-sell shelves to be more sustainable, easier to update, yet flexible—requiring little customization to create the unique brand expression that is needed on-shelf. The display apparatus includes a base tray having a plurality of ribs coupled to the base tray. The plurality of ribs are usually angled upward from a rear of the base tray towards the front of the base tray. Each rib includes a slot defined therein and a front angled portion. The display apparatus further includes a merchandiser tray carrier coupled to the base tray via the ribs. A merchandiser tray is disposed over the merchandiser tray carrier. A rail is coupled to the ribs such that it is flush with the front angled portions of the ribs, thereby creating the top support for a tester tile system and defining an angle of display of product. A second rail with an angle defined and related to the rib's front angled portion is coupled to the front of the base tray, creating the bottom support for the tester tile system.
In another embodiment, a display apparatus is described as including a base tray having a plurality of ribs coupled to the base tray. The plurality of ribs are angled upward from a rear of the base tray towards a front of the base tray. Each of the plurality of ribs has a slot defined therein and a front angled portion. A merchandiser tray carrier is coupled to the base tray via the plurality of ribs. A merchandiser tray is disposed over the merchandiser tray carrier. A tester tile carrier is disposed over the base tray and adjacent to the merchandiser tray. The tester tile carrier has a tester tile coupled thereto. An angle measured from the a surface of the merchandiser tray and a surface of the tester tile is greater than 90 degrees.
Related methods of use of the display chassis are also described. The display chassis system may be completely hidden by custom brand decoration and acts as a feature-filled base structure that replaces hyper customized systems and heavy, complex metal husks.
Reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Various embodiments of a product display chassis, system and methods of using such a display chassis according to the present disclosure are described. It is to be understood, however, that the following explanation is merely exemplary in describing the devices and methods of the present disclosure. Accordingly, several modifications, changes and substitutions are contemplated.
A display chassis according to one embodiment of the present disclosure is denoted with reference numeral 10 in
A decorative frame 16 may be disposed into a pair of rails (upper and lower rails 50, 60 shown in
As best shown in
Referring again to
Referring again to
As shown in
Referring to
In an embodiment, the display chassis 10 described herein may be lightweight and minimalist, and produced from an injection mold process. The display chassis 10 may also be made from recycled and recyclable material to reduce shipping cost and environmental footprint. Further, the display chassis 10 is flexible. That is, the angle and location of the merchandiser tray 22 can change, and in relation, the angle and depth of the tester tile system can change. This allows for custom looks for brands without the bespoke customization of a singular display. The display chassis 10 can be decorated once in place via built-in features in the rails 50 and 60 and base tray 12. For example, custom frames and slide-on information/brand tickets may be applied. When the display chassis 10 is in use on display on a shelf, the display chassis 10 may be completely hidden by the brand skin or custom brand decoration of the user.
It is to be appreciated that the display chassis 10 includes various alternative configurations. In some configurations, the angle between the surface of the merchandiser tray 24 and the surface of the frame or tester tile is greater than 90 degrees. In some configurations, the angle between the surface of the merchandiser tray 24 and the surface of the frame or tester tile is greater than 180 degrees.
While various implementations in accordance with the disclosed principles have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and are not limiting. Thus, the breadth and scope of the implementations should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary implementations, but should be defined only in accordance with the claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described implementations, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.
Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 C.F.R. 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the implementations set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Background,” the discussion therein is not to be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to any implementations in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the implementations set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “implementation” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple implementations may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the implementations, and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings herein.
Lastly, although similar reference numbers may be used to refer to similar elements for convenience, it can be appreciated that each of the various example implementations may be considered distinct variations.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional App. Ser. No. 62/574,733 filed on Oct. 19, 2017, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
704957 | Croom | Jul 1902 | A |
945280 | Lindberg | Jan 1910 | A |
1276781 | Lynds | Aug 1918 | A |
1609945 | Hermani | Dec 1926 | A |
1704365 | McCauley | Mar 1929 | A |
1772619 | Warren | Aug 1930 | A |
2049594 | Stultz | Aug 1936 | A |
2143396 | West | Jan 1939 | A |
2310326 | Swartwout | Feb 1943 | A |
2444584 | Touchett | Jul 1948 | A |
2801753 | Shaw | Aug 1957 | A |
3097746 | Handler | Jul 1963 | A |
4403700 | Manlove | Sep 1983 | A |
4509648 | Govang | Apr 1985 | A |
4775058 | Yatsko | Oct 1988 | A |
4850285 | Suttles | Jul 1989 | A |
4854535 | Winter | Aug 1989 | A |
5255802 | Krinke | Oct 1993 | A |
5314081 | Carroll | May 1994 | A |
5626246 | Roddy | May 1997 | A |
5673801 | Markson | Oct 1997 | A |
6230907 | Stuart | May 2001 | B1 |
6345579 | Zaturensky | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6588863 | Yatchak | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6845871 | Culp | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6883671 | Rushing | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6929131 | Landi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7114300 | Culp | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7270385 | Mathur | Sep 2007 | B2 |
8087522 | Stafford | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8231017 | Clontz | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8607970 | De Lecce | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8899162 | Chikkakalbalu | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8960827 | McMillin | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9422960 | Lortie | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9615640 | Westphal | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9615677 | Trinh | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10130196 | Burns | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10172454 | Moon | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20020027115 | Gay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030173876 | Fujii | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030233965 | Brazier | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040238708 | Berry | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050133474 | Nomoto | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145147 | Costa | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050247649 | Scholen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263465 | Chung | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070046160 | Egan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070131632 | Brown | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070205167 | Belokin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20100163501 | Berry | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100258513 | Meyer | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110062294 | Johnson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110100942 | Spizman | May 2011 | A1 |
20130213911 | Theisen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130248475 | Erickson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130343014 | Browning | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140250749 | Theisen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150020361 | Van Buskirk | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150070928 | Rau | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150173529 | Hester-Redmond | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230630 | Taylor | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20170076343 | Bernstein | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180184816 | Bellar | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180360236 | Kim | Dec 2018 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
An International Search Report and the Written Opinion issued by the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 14, 2019 in connection with PCT/IB2018/001301. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190116993 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62574733 | Oct 2017 | US |